Printer Friendly

Radiative neutron [beta]-decay in effective field theory.

We consider radiative [beta]-decay of the neutron in heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory. Nucleon-structure effects not encoded in the weak coupling constants [g.sub.A] and [g.sub.V] are determined at next-to-leading order in the chiral expansion, and enter at the O(0.5%)-level, making a sensitive test of the Dirac structure of the weak currents possible.

Key words: neutron [beta]-decay; radiative corrections.

1. Framework

Experimental studies of [beta]-decay at low energies have played a crucial role in the rise of the Standard Model (SM) [1]. In recent years, continuing, precision studies of neutron [beta]-decay have been performed, to better both the determination of the neutron lifetime and of the correlation coefficients. To realize a SM test to a precision of [approximately equal to]1% or better requires the application of radiative corrections [2]. One component of such, the "outer" radiative correction, is captured by electromagnetic interactions with the charged, final-state particles, in the limit in which their structure is neglected. In this, neutron radiative [beta]-decay enters, and we consider it explicitly. We do so in part (i) to study the hadron matrix elements in O(1/M), as the same matrix elements, albeit at different momentum transfers, enter in muon radiative capture [3], and (ii) to test the Dirac structure of the weak current, through the determination of the circular polarization of the associated photon [4, 5]. Here we report on our recent work--please see Ref. [6] for all details.

In neutron radiative [beta]-decay, bremsstrahlung from either charged particle can occur, and radiation can be emitted from the effective weak vertex. In the pioneering work of Ref. [4] only the bremsstrahlung terms are computed--this suffices only if all O(1/M) terms are neglected. Here we describe a systematic analysis of neutron radiative [beta]-decay in the framework of heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory (HBCHPT) [7, 8, 9] and in the small scale expansion (SSE) [10], including all terms in O(1/M), i.e., at next-to-leading order (NLO) in the small parameter [epsilon] [6]. We note that [epsilon] collects all the small external momenta and quark (pion) masses, relative to the heavy baryon mass M, which appear when HBCHPT is utilized; in case of the SSE, such is supplemented by the [DELTA](1232)-nucleon mass splitting, relative to M, as well. These systematic approaches allow us to calculate the recoil-order corrections in a controlled way.

We consider n(p) [right arrow] p(p') + [e.sup.-]([l.sub.c]) + [bar.v.sub.e]([l.sub.v]) + [gamma](k), where p, p', [l.sub.e], [l.sub.v], and k denote the four-momentum of the neutron, proton, electron, anti-neutrino, and photon, respectively--we denote the photon energy by [omega]. At low energies, the matrix element for radiative neutron [beta]-decay decomposes into two pieces,

M(n [right arrow] p[e.sup.-][bar.v.sub.e][gamma]) = i[[g.sup.[alpha][beta]]/[M.sub.W.sup.2]][<[bar.v.sub.e][e.sup.-]|[J.sub.[alpha].sup.-]|0><p|T(V * [epsilon]* [V.sub.[beta].sup.+] - V * [epsilon]* [A.sub.[beta].sup.+])|n> + <[bar.v.sub.e][e.sup.-][gamma]|[J.sub.[alpha].sup.-]|0><p|[V.sub.[beta].sup.+] - [A.sub.[beta].sup.+]|n>], (1)

in terms of the leptonic weak current ([J.sup.-]), as well as the hadronic vector (V) and axial.vector (A) currents. Note that [[epsilon].sub.[mu]] is the photon polarization vector and [M.sub.W] is the W-boson mass. The first term includes bremsstrahlung from the proton, as well as radiation from the effective weak vertex, whereas the second term describes bremsstrahlung from the electron. We now turn to the leptonic and hadronic matrix elements which appear. The leptonic current matrix elements follow from QED, in concert with the V-A structure of the weak current. The latter, cum Lorentz and translational invariance [11], also fixes <p|[V.sub.v.sup.+] - [A.sub.v.sup.+]|n>; the form factors which appear therein can be determined from experiment. To compute the remaining matrix elements, <p|T(V * [epsilon]*[V.sub.v.sup.+] - V * [epsilon]* [A.sub.v.sup.+])|n>, we employ HBCHPT. Thus the heavy baryon is treated non-relativistically, and its interactions are organized in powers of [epsilon]. We work in O(1/M) throughout, so that our matrix elements include photon emission from the weak vertex as well. For consistency we also treat <p|[V.sub.v.sup.+] - [A.sub.v.sup.+]|n> in the non-relativistic limit, expanding to O(1/[M.sup.2]) throughout. We note that the pertinent two- and four-point functions can be taken directly from Ref. [3], after relabeling the momenta and such [6]. Working in the Coulomb gauge [epsilon]* * v = 0 for the photon and making use of the transversality condition [epsilon]* * k = 0, we find <p|T(V * [epsilon]*[V.sub.v.sup.+] - V * [epsilon]* [A.sub.v.sup.+])|n> is of O(1/M), so that only electron bremsstrahlung makes an O(1) contribution to radiative neutron [beta]-decay.

2. Results

We now present our results [6]. We show the photon energy spectrum d[GAMMA]/d[omega] in Fig. 1, and for the total branching ratio, which depends on the range chosen for [omega], we find,

[omega] [member of] [0.005 MeV, 0.035 MeV], Br : 2.59 * [10.sup.-3],

[omega] [member of] [0.035 MeV, 0.100 MeV], Br : 1.11 * [10.sup.-3],

[omega] [member of] [0.100 MeV, [[omega].sup.max] = 0.782 MeV], Br : 0.72 * [10.sup.-3], (2)

The branching ratio determined for [omega] [member of] [0.035 MeV, 0.100 MeV] can be compared directly with the experimental limit of Br < 6.9 * [10.sup.-3] (90% CL) [12], with which it is compatible. In Fig. 1 we superimpose the numerical results we find with those using the leading order form of [[summation].sub.spins]|M|[.sup.2]. The two curves can scarcely be distinguished; indeed, the recoil-order corrections to the matrix elements are no larger than O(0.5%). The SSE contribution is itself of O(0.1%). In contrast, the recoil-order corrections to the A and a correlations in neutron [beta]-decay are of O(1-2%) [13]; apparently, the appearance of an additional particle in the final state makes the recoil-order corrections smaller still.

We also compute the polarization of the emitted photon. Defining the polarization states such that [[epsilon].sub.L], e.g., does indeed correspond to a left-handed photon when k||[l.sub.e] [6], we determine the polarization P via P = ([[GAMMA].sub.R] - [[GAMMA].sub.L])/([[GAMMA].sub.R] - [[GAMMA].sub.L]). We can also study the polarization as a function of [omega] and [E.sub.e] as well; in such cases, we define P([omega]) by replacing [[GAMMA].sub.L,R] with d[[GAMMA].sub.L,R]/d[omega] and P([omega], [E.sub.e]) by replacing [[GAMMA].sub.L,R] with [d.sup.2][[GAMMA].sub.L,R]/d[omega]d[E.sub.e]. We find that the polarization evolves from near-zero at low photon energies to nearly 100% left-handed polarization at high photon energies, as consistent with the discussion of Ref. [5].


The evolution of the polarization with [omega] is dissected in Fig. 2; as [omega] grows large, the associated electron momentum is pushed towards zero, and the absolute polarization grows larger. This follows as in the circular basis we can replace (2[[epsilon]*.sub.[+ or -]] * [l.sub.e] - k[[epsilon]*.sub.[+ or -]]) in <[bar.v.sub.e][e.sup.-][gamma]|[J.sub.[mu].sup.-]|0> with (2[[epsilon]*.sub.[+ or -]] * [l.sub.e] - [omega](1[+ or -] [[gamma].sub.5])[[gamma].sup.0][[epsilon]*.sub.[+ or -]]) with [[epsilon].sub.+.-] = [[epsilon].sub.R,L]. The photon associated with the first term has no circular polarization; this contribution vanishes if |[l.sub.e]| = 0. In this observable as well the O(1/M) contributions are O(0.5%) or less. Interestingly, the inclusion of these contributions does not impact the determined polarization to an appreciable degree when [l.sub.e]||[+ or -] k; P [approximately equal to] -1. Note that as [E.sub.e] approaches [E.sub.e.sup.max]([omega]), [l.sub.e] becomes parallel to -k, so that [epsilon]* * [l.sub.e] approaches zero and P approaches -1 to a high degree of accuracy. In neutron radiative [beta]-decay, the polarization can differ appreciably from unity, so that the calculation of the polarization is necessary to realize a SM test; significant deviations from this prediction would nevertheless signify the palpable presence of a left-handed anti-neutrino or of non-V-A currents. As noted by Martin and Glauber [5], the polarization of the photon in S-state orbital electron capture is also sensitive to the phase of the vector and axial-vector couplings in the low-energy interaction Hamiltonian [14] if the anti-neutrino is no longer assumed to be strictly right-handed. Such expectations apply to neutron radiative [beta]-decay as well, so that the photon polarization can probe new physics effects to which the correlation coefficients in neutron [beta]-decay are insensitive [15].


In summary, we have computed the photon energy spectrum and photon polarization in neutron radiative [beta]-decay in an effective field theory approach, utilizing HBCHPT and the SSE, including all terms in O(1/M). The leading contribution to the photon energy spectrum has been calculated previously [4]; we agree with the expression in Ref. [4] for [[SIGMA].sub.spins]|M|[.sup.2], though we disagree with their numerical results for the photon energy spectrum. Moreover, we .nd that the O(1/M) terms are numerically quite small, generating contributions no larger than O(0.5%), so that radiative neutron [beta]-decay is quite insensitive to nucleon structure effects beyond those encoded in [g.sub.V] and [g.sub.A]. We have found that nucleon structure effects have a similarly negligible role in the determination of the photon polarization, so that a precise measurement of the photon polarization may well offer a crisp diagnostic of non-SM effects.


S. G. thanks the organizers for the opportunity to speak at a very pleasant meeting. The work of S. G. is supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy under contract number DE-FG02-96ER40989.

3. References

[1] J. Deutsch, arXiv:nucl-th/9901098; see also D. Dubbers, Nucl. Phys. A 654, 297C (1999).

[2] W. J. Marciano and A. Sirlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 22 (1986); A. Sirlin, in Precision Tests of the Standard Electroweak Model, P. Langacker, ed., World-Scientific, Singapore (1994).

[3] V. Bernard, T. R. Hemmert, and U.-G. Meissner, Nucl. Phys. A 686, 290 (2001).

[4] Y. V. Gaponov and R. U. Khafizov, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 59, 1213 (1996) [Yad. Fiz. 59, 1270 (1996)]; Phys. Lett. B 379, 7 (1996); Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 440, 557 (2000).

[5] P. C. Martin and R. J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. 109, 1307 (1958) and references therein.

[6] V. Bernard, S. Gardner, U.-G. Meissner, and C. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B 593, 105 (2004) [Erratum-ibid. B599, 348 (2004)].

[7] E. Jenkins and A. V. Manohar, Phys. Lett. B 255, 558 (1991).

[8] V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, J. Kambor, and U.-G. Meissner, Nucl. Phys. B 388, 315 (1992).

[9] V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, and U.-G. Meissner, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 4, 193 (1995).

[10] T. R. Hemmert, B. R. Holstein, and J. Kambor, J. Phys. G 24, 1831 (1998).

[11] M. L. Goldberger and S. B. Trieman, Phys. Rev. 111, 354 (1958).

[12] M. Beck et al., JETP Lett. 76, 332 (2002).

[13] S. Gardner and C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5666 (2001) and references therein.

[14] T. D. Lee and C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. 104, 254 (1956).

[15] J. D. Jackson, S. B. Treiman, and H. W. Wyld, Jr., Phys. Rev. 106, 517 (1957).

About the authors: Susan Gardner is an associate professor of physics at the University of Kentucky, Lexington. Veronique Bernard is Directeur de recherches CNRS at the ULP, Strasbourg. Ulf-G. Meissner holds a Chair in Theoretical Physics at Bonn University and is a Director at the Institute for Nuclear Physics at the FZ Julich. Chi Zhang completed his Ph.D. in physics at the University of Kentucky and is currently a postdoctoral fellow in computational biophysics at SUNY, Buffalo.

Susan Gardner

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506-0055, USA

Veronique Bernard

Universite Louis Pasteur, Laboratoire de Physique Theorique 3-5, rue de l'Universite, F-67084 Strasbourg, France

Ulf-G. Meissner

Universitat Bonn, Helmholtz-Institut fur Strahlen-und Kernphysik (Theorie) Nussallee 14-16, D-53115 Bonn, Germany


Forschungszentrum Julich, Institut fur Kernphysik (Theorie) D-52425 Julich, Germany


Chi Zhang (1)

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506-0055, USA

Accepted: August 11, 2004

Available online:

(1) Present Address: 124 Sherman Hall, The Department of Physiology and Biophysics, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14214.
COPYRIGHT 2005 National Institute of Standards and Technology
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Zhang, Chi
Publication:Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jul 1, 2005
Previous Article:On the measurement of the electron-neutrino correlation in neutron beta decay.
Next Article:Search for radiative [beta]-decay of the free neutron.

Related Articles
Radiative corrections for neutron decay and search for new physics.
Standard model treatment of the radiative corrections to neutron [beta]-decay.
A superconducting magnet UCN trap for precise neutron lifetime measurements.
On the measurement of the neutron lifetime using ultracold neutrons in a vacuum quadrupole trap.
The beta-, neutrino- and proton-asymmetry in neutron [beta]-decay.
Measurement of neutron decay parameters--the abBA experiment.
Search for radiative [beta]-decay of the free neutron.
Detecting the radiative decay mode of the neutron.
Monte Carlo study of the abBA experiment: detector response and physics analysis.
The T-odd R and D correlations in beta decay.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters