Printer Friendly

Questions remain over Heathrow expansion.

Byline: Peter Woodman

POLITICIANS are likely to have to decide between a new runway at either Heathrow or Gatwick following an interim report by the Whitehall-commissioned Airports Commission.

Expansion at Stansted in Essex has been ruled out until after 2030 by the commission, which is headed by former Financial Services Authority chief Sir Howard Davies.

Sir Howard's team have not closed the door on a Thames Estuary scheme, which is favoured by London mayor Boris Johnson.

But although the commission will study estuary schemes further, Sir Howard described it as "imaginative", adding it could cost as much as PS112bn and would need much more public money than the other options.

The commission concluded there was "a need for one net additional runway to be in operation in the South East by 2030 and there was "likely to be a demand case for a second additional runway to be operational by 2050".

Sir Howard's team said it would be taking proposals for new runways at two locations forward for further detailed study.

The plan at Gatwick is for a new runway to the south of the existing one.

While at Heathrow there are two options - the first is for one 3,500-metre (11,500ft) runway to the north west to add to the two existing runways.

This would be a less-noisy option than the runway proposed in Labour's White Paper and would avoid the loss of Sipson village.

The second option is one is a proposal to extend the existing northern runway to at least 6,000 metres (20,000ft), enabling the extended runway to operate as two independent runways.

The commission said it had not added the Thames Estuary options to the short list "as there were too many uncertainties and challenges" surrounding them at this stage.

Sir Howard's team will now undertake further study of the Isle of Grain estuary option in the first half of 2014 and "will reach a view later next year on whether that option offers a credible proposal for consideration alongside the other shortlisted options".

The commission also said there was likely to be a case for considering Stansted and Birmingham as potential options for any second new runway by 2050.

There are no firm long-term proposals in the commission's interim report. Those will come when the commission makes its final report in the summer of 2015 - after the next general election.

The last Labour government supported a third runway at Heathrow, but expansion at the west London airport was ruled out by the coalition when it took power in May 2010.

Last week, Tory MP Zac Goldsmith said any decision by the PM to back Heathrow expansion would represent an "off-the-scale betrayal" and David Cameron would "never be forgiven in west London". Mr Johnson said a third runway at Heathrow would be "completely crackers".

Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin has said the coalition's pledge was not to build a third runway "in this parliament" and stressed any decision would come after 2015.

Sir Howard said the shortlist had been finalised last week and his team had "gone back and forward" over whether to keep the estuary schemes "in place".

Sir Howard was repeatedly asked whether he had to take on board any views from ministers.

He replied: "The short list has not been influenced by politicians."
COPYRIGHT 2013 MGN Ltd.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2013 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:The Journal (Newcastle, England)
Geographic Code:4EUUK
Date:Dec 18, 2013
Words:552
Previous Article:Nigella and the rolled up notes...
Next Article:Stars' Disney treat for kids; BRITAIN TODAY.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters