Printer Friendly

Quantitative levels of C-reactive protein in cerebrospinal fluid in children with bacterial and other meningitis.

INTRODUCTION: Meningitis is one of the most potentially serious infections occurring in infant and older children and important cause of morbidity and mortality in children worldwide. In the developing countries, acute bacterial meningitis (ABM) is one of the major cause of morbidity and mortality (1) Rapid and accurate diagnosis coupled with early appropriate therapy is the utmost importance in reducing morbidity and mortality of the patient. Biochemistry, Cytology, Gram stain, Culture sensitivity of Cerebrospinal fluid usually being done to diagnose and differentiate pyogenic from aseptic meningitis. In such circumstances the detection of C-reactive protein (CRP) in CSF appears to provide a new dimension to the diagnosis of meningitis. (2)

In developing countries, with limited resources, manpower, and skill, we need to think about an easy and comprehensive test by which we can diagnose ABM. Routine use of detection of CSF CRP, could be a reliable and easy to do test and can be done for rapid diagnosis of meningitis.

OBJECTIVE:

GENERAL OBJECTIVE: The study is aimed to estimate the level of CSF-CRP quantitatively in bacterial & other meningitis in among children admitted in Pediatric department of the Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Hospital, Jaipur.

METHODOLOGY: Study design: The estimation of quantitative CSF-CRP among children of meningitis is a hospital based descriptive cross sectional study.

Place of study: All aspects of this study have been accomplished in the department of Pediatrics, of the Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Hospital, Jaipur.

Period of Study: The study was done in a period of 15 months from October 2011 to December 2012.

Sample Size: Total patients were 121.

Inclusion Criteria: Infant and children of ages 1 day to 14 years diagnosed case of meningitis, who required a CSF study to confirm or exclude the diagnosis.

Exclusion criteria: Congenital anomalies of CNS, Non infectious conditions of CNS, Infections at the site of lumbar puncture.

Method of CSF-CRP was quantitatively detected by immuno-turbidimetry method by using Biosystems CRP kit.

121 patients of meningoencephalitis, between 1 day to 14 years of age were included in the study and were divided in 4 groups:- Group I-Pyogenic meningitis, Group II-Tubercular meningitis, Group III-Viral meningitis and Group IV-No CNS infection (Extra cranial infections).

RESULTS: There were 53 cases of bacterial meningitis, 27 cases of viral meningoencephalitis, 13 cases of tubercular meningitis and 28 cases of control group. The male female ratio in the Acute Bacterial Meningitis, Tubercular Bacterial Meningitis, Viral Meningocephalitis and Control Group were 1.94:1, 5.5:1, 1.7:1 and 1.33:1 respectively. All groups were with male predominance.

In present study, the total 53 cases of pyogenic meningitis, 18 (33.96%) were in the age group of < 1 year, 12 (22.64%) were in the age group of 1-5 years and 23 (43.39%) were in the age group of 5-14 years. CSF-culture was positive only 10 cases of bacterial meningitis while all other cases of all groups were culture negative.

In our study, 47 (88.67%) cases out of 53 had quantitative level of CSF-CRP > 1000 ng/ml in bacterial meningitis patients and only 6 (11.32%) cases had <1000 ng/ml. 19 cases (35.84%) had > 2000 ng/ml level of CSF-CRP in this group. In tubercular meningitis patients 11 (84.61%) of 13 had < 1000 ng/ml quantitative level of CSF-CRP and only two had > 1000 ng/ml CSF-CRP. In viral meningoencephalitis group CSF-CRP was > 1000 ng/ml in 5 cases of 27 and rest 22 cases had < 1000 ng/ml quantitative level of CSF-CRP.

The mean CSF CRP was 1862 ng/ml in bacterial meningitis while it was 597 ng/ml in control group and was 992 ng/ml and 816 ng/ml in viral meningoencephalitis & tubercular bacterial meningitis respectively. The difference in CSF CRP between bacterial and all other groups was highly significant. (table 3)

DISCUSSION: Bacterial meningitis is a potentially devastating illness. So prompt recognition and early appropriate treatment is essential. Males are more affected in pyogenic (66%) meningitis. In the present study Gram's smear and CSF culture for pyogenic organism could detect only 24% and 20% cases respectively.

In our study IMMUNOTURBIDIMETRY method was used for quantitative analysis of CRP in CSF by using Biosystems CRP kit to detect CRP in CSF of suspected cases of meningitis. We studied the utility of CRP in the differential diagnosis of meningitis of varying etiology.

Our analysis showed the quantitative value of CSF CRP was significantly higher in bacterial meningitis group. The difference between pyogenic meningitis and control group (p < 0.001), between pyogenic meningitis and viral meningo encephalitis(p < 0.001) and between pyogenic meningitis and tubercular meningitis were highly significant (p < 0.001). The difference between tubercular meningitis and control group and between viral meningo-encephalitis and control group were significant (p < 0.05). While the difference between tubercular meningitis and viral meningo-encephalitis was not significant (p > 0.05). These findings were similar with other study findings like Donald PR et al, Gray BM et al, Hanson LO et al, Trienekens PH et al, Shimetani N et al, Belal M et al (3-8).

CONCLUSION: Although culture of CSF is the gold standard for diagnosis of pyogenic meningitis for direct evidence of the organism, it has some limitation particularly in peripheral set up. Routine use of detection of CSF-C-reactive protein could be a reliable, rapid and easy to do test for the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis and differentiate from aseptic meningitis. It is not an alternative of examination of CSF biochemistry, cytology and culture.

CONTRIBUTORS: Designed by SB & AKM. SB & PPG: retrieved information from case records, collected & analyzed the data; MKK & RG: provided analytic input & guided in analysis & review of literature; all authors contributed to the preparation of the manuscript, provided significant inputs during preparation for final publication & approved the final manuscript. AKM: supervised the study & shall be its guarantor.

BIBLIOGRAPHY:

(1.) Murray CJ and Lopez AD. Global Burden of Disease and Injury Series Global Health Statistics. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1996; 11. 285.

(2.) Pemde HK, Harish K. C-reactive protein in Childhood Meningitis. Indian J. Pediatr 1996; 63: 73-77.

(3.) Donald PR, Starchan AF, Schaeman JF, Beer FCD. Cerebrospinal fluid C-reactive protein in infective meningitis in childhood. J Lab Clin Med. 1985; 106: 424-427.

(4.) Gray BM, Simmons DR, Mason H, Barnum S, Volanakis JE. Quantitative levels of C-reactive protein in cerebrospinal fluid in patients with bacterial meningitis and other condition. J Pediatrics. 1986; 108 (1): 665-670.

(5.) Hanson LO, Lindquist L, Linne T, Sogo E. Quantitation of C-reactive protein in cerebrospinal fluid and serum by zone immunoelectrophoresis assay. J Immunological Methods. 1987, 26; 100(1-2): 191-195.

(6.) Trienekens PH, Willams FTC. Significance of C-reactive protein in spinal fluid. Clin Chem 1985; 31(2):345.

(7.) Shimetani N, Shimetani K, Mori M. Level of three inflammation markers, C-reactive protein, serum amyloid A protein and procalcitonin, in the serum and CSF of patients with meningitis. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2001; 61(7):567-74.

(8.) M Belal Uddin, Manjira Rahman, Siddique A B. Usefulness of CSF C-Reactive Protein in differentiating Pyogenic and Aseptic Meningitis. TAJ 2009; 22(1): 78-81.

Sharad Bansal [1], Rimzim Gupta [2], P.P. Gupta [3], M. K. Kakkar [4], A.K. Malhotra [5]

[1.] M.D. Student, Department Of Pediatrics, Mahatma Gandhi Hospital & Medical College,

[2.] Associate Professor, Department Of Pediatrics, Mahatma Gandhi Hospital & Medical College,

[3.] Professor, Professor, Department Of Pediatrics, Mahatma Gandhi Hospital & Medical College,

[4.] Associate Professor, Department Of Pediatrics, Mahatma Gandhi Hospital & Medical College,

[5.] Professor & HOD, Department Of Pediatrics, Mahatma Gandhi Hospital & Medical College,

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:

Dr. Sharad Bansal, P.G. Hostel, hospital campus, Jaipur.

E-mail: sharadpeds@gmail.com
Table no-1: Distribution according to sex & diagnosis of
patients

Diagnosis              Sex                       Total n (%)

                       Male         Female
                       n (%)        n (%)

Acute                  35 (66.03)   18 (33.97)   53 (100.00)
  Bacterial
  Meningitis
Tubercular             11 (84.62)   2 (15.38)    13 (100.00)
  Bacterial
  Meningitis
Viral                  17 (62.97)   10 (37.03)   27 (100.00)
  Meningocephalitis
Control Group          16 (57.15)   12 (42.85)   28 (100.00)
Total                  79 (65.29)   42 (34.71)   121 (100.00)

Table no-2 Distribution according to CSF CRP level & diagnosis
of patients

CRP (ng/ml)   Diagnosis

              ABM n(%)      TBM n(%)

< 1000        6 (11.32)     11 (84.61)
1000-2000     28 (52.83)    2 (15.38)
> 2000        19 (35.84)    0 (0.00)
Total         53 (100.00)   13 (100.00)

CRP (ng/ml)   Diagnosis                            Total n (%)

              VME n(%)      Control Group n (%)

< 1000        22 (81.48)    25 (89.28)             64 (52.89)
1000-2000     5 (18.51)     3 (10.71)              38 (31.40)
> 2000        0 (0.00)      0 (0.00)               19 (15.70)
Total         27 (100.00)   28 (100.00)            121 (100.00)

Table no-3 Mean [+ or -] SD of CSF CRP according to diagnosis
of subjects

Diagnosis        No.          Mean [+ or -] SD ng/ml

ABM              53           1862.20 [+ or -] 812.19
TBM              13           816.00 [+ or -] 361.55
VME              27           992.00 [+ or -] 462.92
Control Group    28           597.20 [+ or -] 301.38

Control Group    p < 0 .001   Highly        ABM v/s TBM
  v/s ABM                     Significant
Control Group    p < 0 .01    Significant   Control Group v/s
  v/s VME                                     TBM
ABM v/s VME      p < 0 .01    Significant   TBM v/s VME

Control Group    p <0.001    Highly
  v/s ABM                    Significant
Control Group    p < 0.001   Highly
  v/s VME                    Significant
ABM v/s VME      p > 0.05    Not Significant
COPYRIGHT 2013 Akshantala Enterprises Private Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2013 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Author:Bansal, Sharad; Gupta, Rimzim; Gupta, P.P.; Kakkar, M.K.; Malhotra, A.K.
Publication:Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences
Article Type:Report
Date:Jun 24, 2013
Words:1555
Previous Article:Analysis of menstrual cycle irregularities in adolescent girls in a tertiary care hospital.
Next Article:Pterion its location and clinical implications- a study compared.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters