Printer Friendly

Punitive damages.

Question: A physician injected silicone into a patient for purposes of breast augmentation, but used a preparation that was labeled "not for human use." The patient experienced inflammation, burning, and discoloration, and subsequently developed chronic cyst formation in the breasts. In a lawsuit against the doctor, which of the following best describes the legal consequences?

A. Assuming negligence is proven, she will be awarded both compensatory and punitive damages.

B. Punitive damages are also called hedonic damages.

C. An award for pain and suffering is an example of punitive damages.

D. Punitive damages are frequently bundled with compensatory damages in medical malpractice lawsuits.

E. In order to be awarded punitive damages, the plaintiff typically must prove that the defendant was grossly negligent, exhibiting wanton and reckless disregard of the risks.

Answer: E. Punitive damages, also called exemplary damages, are uncommon in medical malpractice actions. They are awarded only in situations where there is gross or aggravated negligence and not in ordinary negligence, where compensatory damages constitute the usual remedy. The above hypothetical is taken from an actual case where punitive damages were allowed by the courts because of the egregious nature of misconduct.

The use of punitive damages is justified where there is a reckless, willful, or wanton disregard of the obvious risk of harm. The term "gross negligence" is sometimes used to describe this type of misconduct.

For example, evidence that a defendant had prescribed an excessive number of birth control pills (over 1,000 pills within a time period when less than 200 were sufficient) with resulting liver complications was deemed sufficient to raise the issue of gross negligence {Jackson v. Taylor).

The U.S, Supreme Court has advanced a three-prong test to determine whether punitive damages are excessive. They are the degree of reprehensibility of the defendant's conduct; the ratio between the plaintiff's compensatory damages and the amount of punitive damages; and the difference between the punitive award and the civil or criminal sanctions that could be imposed for comparable misconduct.

It is not always easy to predict whether an appellate court will allow punitive damages, reduce the amount (termed a remitted), or disallow them altogether. In Noe v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, the Supreme Court of Oregon disallowed punitive damages where the defendants (a medical resident and supervising staff physician) were judged to be negligent for performing a circumcision without parental authorization, but did not act in an aggravated disregard for their professional duties. In Manning v. Twin Falls Clinic & Hospital, Inc., punitive damages were allowed to stand against a nurse who moved a patient with terminal chronic obstructive lung disease without providing portable oxygen. However, the hospital was not liable as there was insufficient evidence to indicate that it ratified the nurse's conduct.

Other court decisions have upheld punitive damages in medical malpractice actions. For example, a $2 million award was not considered excessive or disproportionate to the loss of life caused by a gastric bypass surgical procedure that was complicated by postoperative infection (McKowan v. Day).

One important practical point: Punitive damages may not be a covered benefit in some professional liability insurance policies (for example, Medical Insurance Exchange of California), which means the practitioner's personal assets may then be at risk.

Dr. Tan is an emeritus professor at the University of Hawaii, Honolulu. This article is educational and does not constitute medical, ethical, or legal advice.
COPYRIGHT 2011 International Medical News Group
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2011 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:LAW & MEDICINE
Author:Tan, S.Y.
Publication:Internal Medicine News
Article Type:Interview
Date:Dec 1, 2011
Previous Article:NCQA launches accreditation of ACOs.
Next Article:Primary care residents, psychologists team up.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters