Pulsar-orbiting exoplanets rare: first extrasolar worlds ever found have few counterparts.
Planets and pulsars, the whirling cores of dead massive stars, appear to be an unlikely match. Most of these pulsating stellar corpses can't nurture fledgling planetary systems, new research suggests.
Scrutiny of 151 pulsars turned up no evidence of planets, researchers report in the Aug. 10 Astrophysical Journal. Planet nurseries must therefore rarely appear in the wakes of supernova explosions out of which pulsars are born, Matthew Kerr and colleagues propose.
"I was fairly pessimistic about finding any," says Kerr, an astrophysicist at the Australia Telescope National Facility in Epping. "But you never know until you go and look."
Reported in 1992, the first planets to be confirmed beyond the solar system were found around a pulsar designated PSR B1257+12. Despite the discovery of over 1,500 worlds since then, astronomers have found only one other pulsar, PSR B1620-26, that harbors a planet.
Any planets around a pulsar either improbably survived the detonation of their sun or formed out of debris raining down in the wake of the explosion. If the backwash of gas and dust forms a disk encircling the pulsar, then planets might form the same way they do around young stars. The lack of pulsar planets suggests that such disks are rare.
One caveat is that all 151 pulsars are young and energetic, notes astrophysicist Alex Wolszczan of Penn State, who codiscovered the first pulsar planets. Young pulsars blast the surrounding space with radiation. "You run the risk that you evaporate a disk even before planet formation starts happening," he says. Expanding the study to include older pulsars--an effort that Kerr has already started--would be more definitive.
The two known pulsar planet systems appear to be oddballs. The pulsar that hosts the first confirmed exoplanets has a relatively weak magnetic field, which might have helped a planet-building ring to form. The second pulsar shares its planet with a companion star; the planet was probably snatched from the pulsar's neighbor.
"People were so enthusiastic about those two serendipitous discoveries, they believed we would have found more surprises by now," says Stephen Thorsett, president of Willamette University in Salem, Ore., and codiscoverer of the second pulsar planet system. "The fact that they aren't found is a pretty strong statement that they aren't there."
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||ATOM & COSMOS|
|Date:||Oct 3, 2015|
|Previous Article:||BPA replacements found in people: cashiers had potentially risky amounts of 2 receipt chemicals.|
|Next Article:||Genes that spark embryo growth ID'd: humans differ from mice in earliest days after fertilization.|