Printer Friendly

Prove it.

Evidence -- information that proves or disproves disputed facts.

In criminal law it's up to the prosecution to supply evidence of a crime and prove the accused guilty beyond reasonable doubt.

That evidence can come from eye-witnesses to a crime, documents, articles found at the scene of a crime, or relevant circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial evidence is information that, on its own, doesn't really prove anything but coupled with other evidence may prove a fact. For example, if an accused person was in the area where a crime was committed, then it doesn't prove he committed the crime, only that he could have.

Basically, anything that might establish the guilt or innocence of the accused may be admitted as evidence, except for hearsay -- statements made out of court by someone ho isn't present to testify under oath at a trial. Generally, such statements aren't allowed in court, unless they are made by the accused. As long as it was free and voluntary, any statement of guilt by the accused may be introduced in court. However, no accused person can be forced to testify against himself. Privileged communications between lawyers and clients are excluded as evidence. And, evidence obtained in a manner that infringed or denied any rights or freedoms guaranteed by the Charter also is excluded if its admission would create an injustice.
COPYRIGHT 1995 Canada & the World
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1995, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:types of evidence recognized by Canadian courts
Publication:Canada and the World Backgrounder
Date:Dec 1, 1995
Words:221
Previous Article:The facts, and nothing but the facts.
Next Article:Finding the truth.
Topics:


Related Articles
Panel OKs DNA fingerprints in court cases.
The facts, and nothing but the facts.
Instant evidence: how to assess admissibility when every second counts.
Assessing the fitness of novel scientific evidence in the post-Daubert era: pesticide exposure cases as a paradigm for determining admissibility.
Polygraph evidence: winds of change?
Proving age discrimination with ageist comments.
Ninth Circuit revives radiation-exposure litigation.
Electronic records as evidence: the case for Canada's new standard: when Canada's Electronic Records as Documentary Evidence standard is released...
The 'fruits' of Miranda violations.
'Apology' legislation gives wrongdoers a safe haven.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters