Printer Friendly

Proteome Changes of Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Induced by 1,4-Benzoquinone.

1. Introduction

Benzene, a volatile solvent and ubiquitous contaminant in indoor air or outdoor environment, comes mostly from traffic emissions, followed by the production of oil and fuel. Exposure to benzene causes leukemia and other blood disorders, such as aplastic anemia, myelodysplasia, and malignant lymphoma [1, 2]. Recent studies further demonstrated that long-term occupational or environmental exposure to low levels of benzene can also lead to blood disorders [3]. Previous studies have shown that mechanisms of benzene effect on hematopoietic disorders are complex, including DNA damage, DNA methylation, genomic instability, and apoptosis [4, 5]. Both animal and human exposure studies of benzene toxicity found biotransformation from parent compounds to reactive species. Benzene itself does not have genotoxicity [6]. As described by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA, 1998), benzene transferring to phenolic metabolites (phenol, catechol, and hydroquinone) in the liver is an important primary event of benzene toxicity. These metabolites are then transported to bone marrow, a source of peroxidases. Among those peroxidases, myeloperoxidase is found with particularly high concentrations, which activates hydroquinone to 1,4-benzoquinone (1,4-BQ), a more reactive species of benzene [6]. However, to date, mechanisms of benzene toxicity in haematology are still obscure.

It is not yet clear if 1,4-BQ is responsible for benzene toxicity. Recent study showed that the DNA damage or cytotoxicity caused by benzene may be attributed to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which lead to adducts of protein and DNA, DNA strand breaks, and inhibition of DNA repair. ROS induced by benzene's metabolites cause the hematopoietic disorders. In previous study, 1,4BQ induced ROS in chicken erythroblast HD3 cells. It is suggested that benzene may exert its toxicity through ROSmediated c-myb signaling pathway in vitro [7]. 1,4-BQ also forms adducts of DNA or protein in vitro and in vivo. Gaskell et al. found formation of four major DNA adducts from DNA reaction with 1,4-BQ in vitro [8]. Increased adducts of the albumin (Alb) with 1,4-benzoquinone (1,4-BQ-Alb) were also found in benzene exposed-workers [9,10]. Analysis of mRNA expression in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) of 129/SvJ (129X1/SvJ) mice exposed to 1,4-BQ in vitro showed an altered expression of DNA repair genes when compared to control HSCs [11]. 1,4-BQ is a poison of topoisomerase II which is associated with DNA repair in vitro [12]. If the DNA damage resulting from benzene exposure cannot be properly repaired, cells will undergo apoptosis to prevent proliferation or development of mutated cells that transform into malignancies. Other studies showed that benzene's reactive metabolites such as 1,4-BQ exert their toxic effects through covalent and/or oxidative damage proteins. Proteins related to the benzene and its metabolites-mediated hematoxicity, including CYP2E1, aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), myeloperoxidase, microsomal epoxide hydrolase, quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), thioredoxin, connexin 43, and topoisomerase [13-15]. These proteins have a diverse range of functions in cell metabolism, oxygen stress, cell signal transaction, and DNA repair.

Previous studies have shown that bone marrow stem cells may be targets of benzene-induced cytotoxicity and DNA damage, leading to hematopoietic disorders and cancers [16-18]. Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in the bone marrow [19] are a small population (<0.05% of BM) of self-renewing, pluripotent cells which give rise to all blood cells. In a previous study, HSCs showed a dose-dependent cytotoxic response to benzene's metabolite-1,4-BQ exposure [16]. Exposure to benzene also arrested the cell cycle of HSCs [20]. It is suggested recently that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in bone marrow, another kind of stem cells, provide structural and functional support for haematopoiesis. MSCs colocalize with HSCs in the bone marrow, forming multipotent and self-renewing mesenspheres, which are required for HSCs maintenance, homing, and migration [19]. Zolghadr et al.'s findings revealed that higher concentrations of BQ induced cell death in MSCs after 24 h of exposure [21]. Our previous study also found that 1,4-BQ not only inhibited the proliferation activity of HSCs but also inhibited the proliferation of MSCs [22]. We speculate that MSCs may be implicated in the initiation, development, and various aspects of hematotoxic damage induced by benzene and its metabolites. The mechanism of MSCs damage caused by benzene and its metabolites is still unclear.

Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine how 1,4BQ induced changes of protein profiles in hBM-MSCs. It will help us to find novel target proteins and to explore molecular mechanisms of hematopoietic toxicity caused by benzene and its metabolites.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. HBM-MSCs' Isolation and Cultivation. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhejiang Academy of Medical Sciences (Zhejiang, China) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from three male volunteers aged between 20 and 40 years prior to the study. Bone marrow from the volunteers with no benzene exposure and any other haematological diseases was collected. Experiments were repeated three times from different donors. Human MSCs were isolated as described previously [23] with modification. Mononuclear cells were isolated by density gradient centrifugation through 1.073 g/ml Ficoll-Paque PREMIUM (GE Healthcare Bio-Science AB, Uppsala, Sweden) at 400 g for 30 min. Mononuclear cells were seeded in culture flask at 1 x [10.sup.6]/ml (a total volume of 5 ml) in low glucose (1.0 g/l) Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and were maintained in 5% C[O.sub.2] and 95% humidity at 37[degrees]C to collect the adherent hBM-MSCs likely cells. After 10 d of culture, adherent cells formed homogenous colonies and were disassociated by 0.05% trypsin and subcultured with a split ratio of 1:3. The medium was changed every 2-3 d and hBM-MSCs from passage 3 were used for the following studies.

2.2. Identification of HBM-MSCs by Flow Cytometry Analysis. As described in a previous study [24], after 14 d incubation, hBM-MSCs likely cells were trypsinized into single-cell suspension, counted, and washed with PBS. For identification of hBM-MSCs, phycoerythrin- (PE-) conjugated mouse monoclonal antibody against human CD29, CD34, CD44, and CD45 (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) was added to cell suspension at concentrations recommended by the manufacturer, and cells were analyzed on a FACSCalibur Flow Cytometry (BD Biosciences). Data were collected using CellQuest Pro[TM] v5.2. software (BD Biosciences).

2.3. MTT Assay. 1,4-BQ (CAS number 106-51-4, 99.5%) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Cells were seeded in 96-well plates with the concentration of 1 x [10.sup.4]/ml (100 [micro]l in each well) and treated with 1, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 200, 500, and 1000 [micro]M of 1,4BQ for 24 h. Three independently repeated experiments were performed. Cytotoxic effects of 1,4-BQ on hBM-MSCs were determined using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay following previous studies [25, 26].

2.4. Sample Preparation for Two-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis (2DE). According to the results of MTT, we selected 10, 25, and 50 [micro]M of 1,4-BQ for 2DE analysis. After being treated with different doses of 1,4-BQ for 24 h, hBM-MSCs were washed with PBS, suspended in 2DE lysis buffer (7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% (wt/vol) CHAPS, 0.5% (v/v) IPG buffer, 50 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), and 1% (v/v) protease inhibitor mix (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden)). After incubating on ice for 30 min, samples were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm at 4[degrees]C for 1 h, and the total soluble proteins were used for subsequent 2DE. Protein quantitative analysis was performed with the Bio-Rad Protein Assay Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). All samples were stored at -80[degrees]C until further 2DE analysis.

2.5. 2DE Analysis and In-Gel Tryptic Digestion. Protein samples (350 [micro]g each) were dissolved in rehydration buffer (7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 2% (m/v) CHAPS, 50 mM DTT, and 0.5% (v/v) IPG buffer) and rehydrated with 24 cm IPG strip (pH 5-8, Bio-Rad) for 12 h at 20[degrees]C followed by ID isoelectric focusing (IEF) in a maximum current of 50 [micro]A/IPG strip. The 1D isoelectric focusing (IEF) was performed at 250 V for 0.5 h, 500 V for 1h, 4000 V for 2h, 6000 V for 2h, 8000 V for 2h, 10000 V for 2h, and 10000 V for 8h. The IPG strip was equilibrated twice: first for 15 min in 20 ml equilibration solution I (6 M urea, 2% (m/v) SDS, 0.375 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 20% (v/v) glycerol, and 2% (m/v) DTT); second in equilibration solution II (2.5% (m/v) iodoacetamide instead of 2% (m/v) DTT). For the 2D electrophoresis, the equilibrated IPG strips were placed on top of 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels (SDS-PAGE) and sealed with 0.5% agarose in SDS running buffer. SDS-PAGE was performed for 30 min at a constant current of 20 mA/gel and then 30 mA/gel until the bromophenol blue dye front reached the lower edge of the gel. After electrophoresis, gels were fixed and stained by using Protein Silver Staining Kit (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) according to instructions. Images of the silver-stained 2DE gels were collected by using ImageScanner III (GE Healthcare) and analyzed by using Imagemaster software (Version 6.0, GE Healthcare). All protein spots were detected with the same settings of brightness, contrast, and color to minimize bias. The raw quantity of each spot in a member gel was divided by the total quantity of valid spots in the gel. After data analysis, protein spots that were differentially expressed (>1.5-fold, P < 0.05) were excised from the gels for in-gel digestion as described previously [27].

2.6. Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The separation and identification of digested protein were conducted by a Finnigan linear trap quadrupole (LTQ) mass spectrometer (Thermo Finnigan, San Jose, CA) coupling with a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (Thermo Finnigan) according to Stastna et al. [28]. Solvent A was 0.1% (v/v) formic acid, and solvent B was 0.1% v/vformic acid in 80% v/v acetonitrile. The gradient was held at 95% solvent A for 15 min and increased linearly from 5% solvent B to 100% solvent B in 50 min. The peptides were eluted from C18 microcapillary column at flow rate of 150 [micro]l per min. Protein identification using MS/MS raw data was performed with the BioworksBrowser rev.3.1 software (Thermo Electron, San Jose) based on the human Uniprot database.

2.7. Western Blot Analysis. After treatment, the total proteins of hBM-MSCs were extracted with SDS sample buffer and boiled for 5-10 min at 95-100[degrees]C. Western blot was performed according to the previous studies [29, 30]. Proteins were detected with antibodies including polyclonal anti-human Vimentin, monoclonal anti-human HSP27 (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. Danvers, MA, USA), polyclonal human GAPDH (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA), and quantified using the FluorChem FC2 system (Alpha Innotech Corp., Santa Clara, CA, USA).

2.8. Confocal Immunofluorescence Microscopy. As described in previous studies [29, 30], antibodies against HSP27 (1 : 100) and Vimentin (1 : 50) were applied to 1,4-BQ-treated hBM-MSCs, followed by immunofluorescent staining with Alexa Fluor 633 (red)-goat anti-mouse IgG or Alexa Fluor 514 (green)-goat anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen Corp.). Hoechst33342 (Sigma-Aldrich) was used for nuclear counterstaining. Cell morphology and intracellular localization of protein were analyzed by confocal microscopy (Zeiss LSM710, Jena, Germany) and exported as TIFF files using Zeiss ConfoCor 3 systems.

2.9. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR). After treatment, total RNA was extracted from hBM-MSCs using Ultrapure RNA Kit (Cwbiotech, Beijing, China). Reverse transcription was conducted using the RevertAid First Strand cdNa Synthesis Kit (Fermentas, Glen Burmie, MD, USA). To evaluate the mRNA levels of HSP27 and Vimentin, qRT-PCR was performed on LightCycler 2.0 Real-Time PCR System (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) using SYBR Premix Ex Taq[TM] Perfect Real-Time kit (Takara, kyoto, Japan). GAPDH was used as an internal control. Relative quantification (RQ) value was calculated using the comparative cycle threshold method ([2.sup.-[DELTA][DELTA]Ct]). Three independent experiments were performed to calculate the average RQ and standard deviations (n = 3).

2.10. Statistical Analysis. Each experiment was conducted at least three times. Data were presented as mean [+ or -] standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 18.0 software (SPSS Inc., Shanghai, China). Student's t-test was used for MTT and 2DE analysis, and one-way ANOVA was used for Western blot and quantitative real-time PCR analysis. Significant difference was further analyzed by Dunnett's multiple comparison methods. All probability values were 2tailed, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. hBM-MSCs Identification. According to the previous study [31], the spindle-like-hBM-MSCs tightly adhered to the flask bottom after 3-d culture. The nonadherent cells can be removed by changing the medium. Larger clones appeared on the 7th day. The fibroblast-like cells with rich cytoplasm and large nucleus began to grow rapidly. Cells became gradually confluent and had a spiral whorl-like outlook (Figure 1(a)). Flow cytometry for analysis of cell surface antigens found the expression of mesenchymal cell markers of CD29 and CD44, instead of hematopoietic stem cell markers of CD34 or CD45 (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). The positive incidence of CD29 and CD44 was 96.2% and 96.1%, and the negative incidence of CD34 and CD45 was 95.3% and 95.5%, respectively (Figure 2(c)).

3.2. Effect of 1,4-BQ on Cell Viability of hBM-MSCs. Cell viability was examined using MTT assay in hBM-MSCs treated with 1, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 200, 500, and 1000 [micro]M1,4-BQ for 24 h. The morphological changes were observed in hBM-MSCs treated with 100 [micro]M 1,4-BQ for 24 h, and many cells were found detached and floated into the medium (Figure 1(b)). In addition, membrane blebbing and cytoplasmic shrinkage were observed; cells were dispersed, and monolayer was not formed (Figure 1(b)). As shown in Figure 1(c), 1,4-BQ significantly inhibited cell viability in hBM-MSCs in a dose-dependent manner (P < 0.05). Cell viability was less than 10% at concentrations of over 200 [micro]M of 1,4-BQ when compared to the control group.

3.3. 2DE Profile of hBM-MSCs. To determine the effect of 1,4-BQ on the proteome of hBM-MSCs, protein profiles were examined and compared between 1,4-BQ-treated and untreated hBM-MSCs. After background subtraction and matching detective spots, the number of protein spots in each group was as follows: 1006 [+ or -] 11 in 10 [micro]M of 1,4-BQ treatment group and 1017 [+ or -] 16 in the corresponding control group; 1207 [+ or -] 5 in 25 [micro]M of 1,4-BQ treatment group and 1190 [+ or -] 13 in the corresponding control group; 1053 [+ or -] 26 in 50 [micro]M of 1,4-BQ treatment group and 1042 [+ or -] 40 in the corresponding control group. The differentially expressed spots were chosen with intensity at least 1.5-fold greater than the corresponding ones on control gels (P < 0.05). As shown in Figure 3(a), 32 protein spots were found differentially expressed between 1,4-BQ-treated groups and control groups.

3.4. Identification and Classification of Differentially Expressed Proteins. After image comparison between treatment and control groups, 42 spots showing a clear spatial separation from surrounding spots, sufficient intensity, and consistent spot shape and size were chosen for the identification by LCMS/MS and 32 of them were successfully identified. Sixteen proteins were upregulated in 1,4-BQ treated groups and the others were downregulated.

The identified proteins can be classified into four categories according to the localization, that is, cytoplasmic, nuclear, membrane-bound, or secreted proteins (Figure 3(b)). Based on their function, 32 proteins can be classified into the following groups: metabolism (25.00%), cell stress response (15.63%), cell skeleton (12.50%), transcription regulation (12.50%), membrane trafficking (6.25%), signal transduction (6.25%), and miscellaneous function (21.87%) (Figure 3(c)). The information of all identified proteins, including protein name, UniPropt ID, function, theoretical MW/pI, ratio of spot volume was listed in Table 1.

Spot 1915, heat shock protein 27 (HSP27), was identified as heat shock protein beta-1. The expression level of HSP27 showed 1.6-fold decrease in 1,4-BQ treated cells. As shown in Figure 4, peptides fragmentation of HSP27 was identified by mass spectra. Vimentin was also identified in spot 1553, which showed a 2.0-fold increase in 1,4-BQ-treated hBMMSCs and had eight matched peptides and 19.3% sequence coverage according to the LC-MS/MS analysis.

3.5. Verification of the Differentially Expressed Proteins. To further confirm the results of 2DE analysis, protein levels of Vimentin and HSP27 in hBM-MSCs treated with 0, 10, 25, and 50 [micro]M of 1,4-BQ were determined by Western blot. The results showed that 50 [micro]M 1,4-BQ significantly decreased expression of HSP27 and increased expression of Vimentin in hBM-MSCs when compared to the control group (P < 0.05) (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)). However, 10 and 25 [micro]M 1,4-BQ did not affect the levels of HSP27 and Vimentin in hBM-MSCs.

To examine whether the altered protein expression of HSP27 and Vimentin in 1,4-BQ-treated hBM-MSCs are related to changes at transcriptional level, we conducted qRT-PCR analysis. The results showed that 50 [micro]M 1,4-BQ significantly decreased the mRNA level of HSP27 and increased the mRNA level of Vimentin in hBM-MSCs in comparison with the control group (P < 0.05) (Figures 6(a) and 6(b)). No difference was found between 10 and 25 [micro]M 1,4-BQ-treated groups and control group (P > 0.05). In addition, the mRNA level of RAP1GDS1 was also significantly increased in hBM-MSCs treated with different concentrations of 1,4-BQ in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 6(c)) (P < 0.05).

To determine their subcellular localization, HSP27 and Vimentin were observed in hBM-MSCs using immunofluorescent staining. The results showed that 50 [micro]M 1,4-BQ led to an extremely low expression of HSP27 (Figure 7) and a higher expression of Vimentin (Figure 8) in hBM-MSCs. Both HSP27 and Vimentin expression were found in the cytoplasm of hBM-MSCs.

4. Discussion

Available data show that benzene causes leukemia and other hematotoxicities [32, 33]. Recently, hematotoxicity was found in workers who were exposed to low levels of benzene [3, 34]. 1,4-BQ, one of major metabolites of benzene, has been related to a lot of effects observed both in vivo and in vitro including formation of DNA adducts, DNA methylation in mouse bone marrow cells, and inhibition of DNA replication [11, 35, 36]. To find effective target proteins for 1,4-BQ is of pivotal importance to better understand the mechanisms of benzene-induced toxicity and hematotoxicity.

In our previous study, hydroquinone, one of the benzene metabolites, induced significantly differential protein expression profile in human liver cells [37], and four proteins were identified, including Rho GDP dissociation inhibitor GDI alpha, 6-phosphogluconolactonase, erbB3 binding protein EBP1, and lamin A/C. Benzene is metabolized in liver to benzene oxide, phenol, and several hydroxylated compounds including hydroquinone. Hydroquinone is then transported to bone marrow and metabolized by myeloperoxidases to highly toxic and mutagenic 1,4-BQ. The toxic effects of benzene are affected by the complex intercellular interactions in the bone marrow microenvironment. hBM-MSCs in the bone marrow are required for the marrow microenvironment maintenance. In the present study, cell viability of hBM-MSCs treated with 25 [micro]M 1,4-BQ for 24 h did not show difference when compared to the control group, which suggests that hBM-MSC cells may not be sensitive to 1,4-BQ. However, in mouse bone marrow cells treated with 1,4-BQ at concentrations of 0.1, 1, and 10 [micro]M for 24 h, levels of p15 and p16 mRNA were significantly upregulated when compared to the controls [38]. Treatment with 37 [micro]M 1,4-BQ for 24 h also led to significant increase of Topo II a promoter activity in K562 cells [39]. 1,4-BQ (1-10 [micro]M for 4h) increased mRNA levels of Rad51, xpc, and mdm-2 in male hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) [11]. In another study, treatment with 5,10, 25, or 50 [micro]M 1,4-BQ for 48 h did not affect cell viability but significantly induced global DNA hypomethylation in human normal hepatic L02 cells [40]. Despite the weak effect on cell viability, 1,4-BQ still showed certain negative effects including genotoxicity, which needs more evidence at the molecular level to improve our understanding. Therefore, in this study, we used 1,4-BQ at concentrations of 10, 25, and 50 [micro]M to investigate the altered protein profiles of hBM-MSCs using a 2DE and LC-MS/MS-based approach.

2DE and LC-MS/MS-based approach makes no assumptions about known or unknown molecules, allowing the process to be independent of any presupposed hypotheses. In this study, we found that there were numbers of proteins with differential expression between 1,4-BQ treated and untreated hBM-MSCs. As mentioned above, the differentially expressed 32 protein identified in the present study participated in various functional aspects including metabolism, cell stress response, cell skeleton, transcription regulation, membrane trafficking, and signal transduction (Figure 3(c)). These findings indicate that mechanism of genotoxicity disorders caused by 1,4-BQ could be related to multifactors.

Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are a family of proteins induced by different insults and can affect many physiological activities. Induction of HSPs allows cells to survive stress conditions. These proteins act as molecular chaperones involved either in the refolding of misfolded proteins or in their elimination if they become irreversibly damaged.

In recent years, proteomic studies have identified several different HSPs in various tumor types as potential clinical biomarkers or molecular targets for cancer therapy [41, 42]. In this study, several heat shock proteins were identified, such as heat shock 27kDa protein (HSP27), heat shock protein 60 (HSP60), heat shock 70kDa protein 5 (HSP70 protein 5), heat shock cognate 71kDa protein (HSP71), and heat shock protein 90kDa beta member 1 (HSP90[beta]1). HSP27 is a cytoprotective chaperone that is phosphor-activated during cell stress, preventing aggregation, and/or regulating activity and degradation of certain client proteins. HSP27 seems to play a crucial role in regulating the balance between cell death and cell survival, where its overexpression is associated with the suppression of apoptosis, increased cytoprotection, and resistance to treatment [43]. The downregulation of HSP27 in the present study suggested that HSP27 may not play the cytoprotective role in response to 1,4-BQ. Instead, the alteration of its expression might be an outcome of the regulation of responsive pathways which need further exploration.

The differentially expressed proteins in this study included some cell skeleton proteins such as Vimentin, betaactin, and alpha-actin-1. These cell skeleton proteins affect cell morphology, strength, motility, and infectivity. Vimentin is a member of the intermediate filament family, which, along with microtubules and actin microfilaments, compose the cytoskeleton of cells [44]. It is normally expressed in mesenchymal cells and associated with tumor invasiveness and migration in a variety of tumor types [45, 46]. Our observation of higher expression of Vimentin in 1,4-BQtreated hBM-MSCs suggested that Vimentin protein expression may be an efficient biomarker of cellular response to 1,4-BQ. Western blot analysis, RT-qPCR, and immunofluorescent analysis further confirmed these findings. Further investigation is needed to understand the functional impact of Vimentin on hBM-MSCs and its relationship to other proteins implicated in benzene-induced leukemogenesis.

In our study, there were several metabolism-related proteins that were significantly upregulated or downregulated. Based on our findings, the expression of Apolipoprotein L2, beta-enolase, putative uncharacterized protein DKFZp686N1815, 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 8 (PSMD8), and transaldolase (spots 4343, 2665, 1983,4493, and 4336) were induced over 1.5-fold, whereas the intensity of 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 1 and creatine kinase M-type (M-CK) decreased 1.5-fold when compared to the control group. 1,4-BQ changed the expression levels of metabolism-related proteins, which was confirmed by examination of the mRNA expression level of RAP1GDS1. In summary, this work revealed the proteome profiles of hBM-MSCs treated with 1,4-BQ using 2DE and LC-MS/MS approaches. The differentially expressed proteins may be useful therapeutic targets for hematopoietic disorders induced by benzene. Further study will be needed to provide more evidence of how these proteins are involved in the hematopoietic disorders induced by benzene and its metabolites.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2789245

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported partly by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 81202244 and 81302464); Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. Y207394 and LQ12H26001); Science Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (nos. 2008F1027 and 2013F20004); Health and Family Planning Commission of Zhejiang Province (2015RCA007). Yun Xiao is sponsored by Zhejiang Provincial Program for the Cultivation of High-level Innovative Health Talents.

References

[1] R. Snyder, "Leukemia and benzene," International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 2875-2893, 2012.

[2] M. G. Bird, H. Greim, D. A. Kaden, J. M. Rice, and R. Snyder, "BENZENE 2009--health effects and mechanisms of bone marrow toxicity: implications for t-AML and the mode of action framework," Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 184, no. 1-2, pp. 3-6, 2010.

[3] Q. Lan, L. Zhang, G. Li et al., "Hematotoxicity in workers exposed to low levels of benzene," Science, vol. 306, no. 5702, pp. 1774-1776, 2004.

[4] J. Hu, H. Ma, W. Zhang, Z. Yu, G. Sheng, and J. Fu, "Effects of benzene and its metabolites on global DNA methylation in human normal hepatic 102 cells," Environmental Toxicology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 108-116, 2014.

[5] M. Michishita, M. Satoh, M. Yamaguchi, K. Hirayoshi, M. Okuma, and K. Nagata, "Phosphorylation of the stress protein HSP27 is an early event in murine myelomonocytic leukemic cell differentiation induced by leukemia inhibitory factor/D-factor," Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 176, no. 3, pp. 979-984, 1991.

[6] G. A. Westphal, J. Bunger, N. Lichey, D. Taeger, A. Monnich, and E. Hallier, "The benzene metabolite para-benzoquinone is genotoxic in human, phorbol-12-acetate-13-myristate induced, peripheral blood mononuclear cells at low concentrations," Archives of Toxicology, vol. 83, no. 7, pp. 721-729, 2009.

[7] J. Wan and L. M. Winn, "Benzene's metabolites alter c-MYB activity via reactive oxygen species in HD3 cells," Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 222, no. 2, pp. 180-189, 2007.

[8] M. Gaskell, K. I. E. McLuckie, and P. B. Farmer, "Genotoxicity of the benzene metabolites para-benzoquinone and hydroquinone," Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 153-154, pp. 267-270, 2005.

[9] S. M. Rappaport, S. Waidyanatha, Q. Qu et al., "Albumin adducts of benzene oxide and 1,4-benzoquinone as measures of human benzene metabolism," Cancer Research, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 1330-1337, 2002.

[10] K. Yeowell-O'Connell, N. Rothman, S. Waidyanatha et al., "Protein adducts of 1,4-benzoquinone and benzene oxide among smokers and nonsmokers exposed to benzene in China," Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 831-838, 2001.

[11] B. Faiola, E. S. Fuller, V. A. Wong et al., "Exposure of hematopoietic stem cells to benzene or 1,4-benzoquinone induces gender-specific gene expression," Stem Cells, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 750-758, 2004.

[12] D. Gurbani, V. Kukshal, J. Laubenthal et al., "Mechanism of inhibition of the ATpase domain of human topoisomerase IIa by

1.4- benzoquinone, 1,2-naphthoquinone, 1,4-naphthoquinone, and 9,10-phenanthroquinone," Toxicological Sciences, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 372-390, 2012.

[13] E. Kondrova, P. Stopka, and P. Soucek, "Cytochrome P450 destruction by benzene metabolites 1,4-benzoquinone and 1.4- hydroquinone and the formation of hydroxyl radicals in minipig liver microsomes," Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 566-575, 2007.

[14] V. Wiwanitkit, J. Suwansaksri, and S. Soogarun, "The urine trans, trans muconic acid biomarker and platelet count in a sample of subjects with benzene exposure," Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 73-76, 2004.

[15] G. F. Kalf, B. A. Hazel, M. J. Hoffmann, D. D. Kim, and R. Snyder, "The interaction of 1,4-benzoquinone, a bioreactive intermediate of benzene, with three proteins essential for differentiation/maturation of the mouse myeloid stem cell," Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 500, pp. 429-439, 2001.

[16] D. J. Abernethy, E. V Kleymenova, J. Rose, L. Recio, and B. Faiola, "Human CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells are sensitive targets for toxicity induced by 1,4-benzoquinone," Toxicological Sciences, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 82-89, 2004.

[17] M. Ishihama, T. Toyooka, and Y. Ibuki, "Generation of phosphorylated histone H2AX by benzene metabolites," Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1861-1868, 2008.

[18] G. J. Morgan and C. L. Alvares, "Benzene and the hemopoietic stem cell," Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 153-154, pp. 217-222, 2005.

[19] S. Mendez-Ferrer, T. V. Michurina, F. Ferraro et al., "Mesenchymal and haematopoietic stem cells form a unique bone marrow niche," Nature, vol. 466, no. 7308, pp. 829-834, 2010.

[20] B.-I. Yoon, Y. Hirabayashi, Y. Kawasaki et al., "Mechanism of action of benzene toxicity: cell cycle suppression in hemopoietic progenitor cells (CFU-GM)," Experimental Hematology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 278-285, 2001.

[21] F. Zolghadr, M. Sadeghizadeh, N. Amirizadeh, S. Hosseinkhani, and S. Nazem, "How benzene and its metabolites affect human marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells," Toxicology Letters, vol. 214, no. 2, pp. 145-153, 2012.

[22] Y. Xiao, L. Ju, W. Wu, X.-L. Gao, J. Wang, and X. Zhang, "Effects of 1,4-benzoquinone on the proliferation activity of human bone marrow stem cells," Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 343-347, 2012.

[23] D.-H. Lee, Y. Ahn, S. U. Kim et al., "Targeting rat brainstem glioma usinghuman neural stem cells and human mesenchymal stem cells," Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 15, no. 15, pp. 4925-4934, 2009.

[24] S.-A. Ock, B.-G. Jeon, and G.-J. Rho, "Comparative characterization of porcine mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow extract and skin tissues," Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1481-1491, 2010.

[25] Y. Li, W.-G. Sun, H.-K. Liu et al., "y-Tocotrienol inhibits angiogenesis of human umbilical vein endothelial cell induced by cancer cell," Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1127-1136, 2011.

[26] J.-R. Liu, B.-Q. Chen, B.-F. Yang et al., "Apoptosis of human gastric adenocarcinoma cells induced by [beta]-ionone," World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 348-351, 2004.

[27] S.-H. Jia, M.-W. Li, B. Zhou et al., "Proteomic analysis of silk gland programmed cell death during metamorphosis of the silkworm Bombyx mori," Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 3003-3010, 2007.

[28] M. Stastna, A. Behrens, P. J. McDonnell, and J. E. Van Eyk, "Analysis of protein composition of rabbit aqueous humor following two different cataract surgery incision procedures using 2-DE and LC-MS/MS," Proteome Science, vol. 9, article 8, 2011.

[29] Q. Liu, H.-W. Dong, W.-G. Sun et al., "Apoptosis initiation of [beta]- ionone in SGC-7901 gastric carcinoma cancer cells via a PI3KAKT pathway," Archives of Toxicology, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 481-490, 2013.

[30] H.-W. Dong, S. Zhang, W.-G. Sun et al., "[beta]-Ionone arrests cell cycle of gastric carcinoma cancer cells by a MAPK pathway," Archives of Toxicology, vol. 87, no. 10, pp. 1797-1808, 2013.

[31] Y. Ma, Y. Xu, Z. Xiao et al., "Reconstruction of chemically burned rat corneal surface by bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells," Stem Cells, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 315-321, 2006.

[32] M. T. Smith, L. Zhang, C. M. McHale, C. F. Skibola, and S. M. Rappaport, "Benzene, the exposome and future investigations of leukemia etiology," Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 192, no. 1-2, pp. 155-159, 2011.

[33] A. M. Hutt and G. F. Kalf, "Inhibition of human DNA topoisomerase II by hydroquinone and p-benzoquinone, reactive metabolites of benzene," Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 104, supplement 6, pp. 1265-1269, 1996.

[34] Z. Xie, Y. Zhang, A. B. Guliaev et al., "The p-benzoquinone DNA adducts derived from benzene are highly mutagenic," DNA Repair, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 1399-1409, 2005.

[35] A. Mansi, R. Bruni, P Capone et al., "Low occupational exposure to benzene in a petrochemical plant: modulating effect of genetic polymorphisms and smoking habit on the urinary t,tMA/SPMA ratio," Toxicology Letters, vol. 213, no. 1, pp. 57-62, 2012.

[36] E. Nies and G. Korinth, "Commentary on 'Penetration of benzene, toluene and xylenes contained in gasolines through human abdominal skin in vitro'," Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 275-277, 2008.

[37] L. Ju, S.-Z. Zhang, R. Zhao, and G.-D. Yao, "Differential proteomic expression in human liver cells stimulated by hydroquinone," Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 658-661, 2006.

[38] J.-F. Tian, C.-H. Peng, X.-Y. Yu, X.-J. Yang, and H.-T. Yan, "Expression and methylation analysis of p15 and p16 in mouse bone marrow cells exposed to 1,4-benzoquinone," Human & Experimental Toxicology, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 718-725, 2012.

[39] R. Singh and L. M. Winn, "The effects of 1,4-benzoquinone on c-Myb and topoisomerase II in K-562 cells," Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, vol. 645, no. 1-2, pp. 33-38, 2008.

[40] J. Hu, H. Ma, W. Zhang, Z. Yu, G. Sheng, and J. Fu, "Effects of benzene and its metabolites on global DNA methylation in human normal hepatic l02 cells," Environmental Toxicology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 108-116, 2014.

[41] D. Sanjuan-Herraez, I. Lliso, A. Pastor, and M. De La Guardia, "Green determination of the presence of volatile organic compounds in vehicle repair shops through passive sampling," Talanta, vol. 98, pp. 40-48, 2012.

[42] W. Wu, C. Zhang, Z. Chen, G. Zhang, and J. Yang, "Differences in heating methods may account for variation in reported effects on yH2AX focus formation," Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, vol. 676, no. 1, pp. 48-53, 2009.

[43] T. Tunsaringkarn, W. Siriwong, A. Rungsiyothin, and S. Nopparatbundit, "Occupational exposure of gasoline station workers to BTEX compounds in Bangkok, Thailand," International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 117-125, 2012.

[44] Y. Terasaki, T. Sasaki, Y. Yagita et al., "Activation of NR2A receptors induces ischemic tolerance through CREB signaling," Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1441-1449, 2010.

[45] Y. Jiang, J. Fu, A. R. Greenlee, Y. Shen, H. Duan, and X. Chen, "Effects of silencing of HER2/neu gene in anti-BPDE-transformed cells," Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 53-59, 2009.

[46] S.-R. Lee, M.-R. Kim, J.-M. Yon et al., "Black ginseng inhibits ethanol-induced teratogenesis in cultured mouse embryos through its effects on antioxidant activity," Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 47-52, 2009.

Wei Wu, (1) Ling Zhang, (2) Min Zhang, (1) Li-JinZhu, (1) Hai-Ling Xia, (1) Jian-Lin Lou, (1) Jia-Ren Liu, (3) and Yun Xiao (1,4)

(1) Institute of Occupational Medicine, Zhejiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310013, China

(2) Reproduction Medicine Center, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310014, China

(3) Department of Diagnosis, The 4th Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150001, China

(4) Department of Environmental Medicine, School of Public Health, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Jia-Ren Liu; jiarl@ems.hrbmu.edu.cn and Yun Xiao; yxlead@126.com

Received 19 September 2016; Revised 11 November 2016; Accepted 23 November 2016

Academic Editor: Juergen Buenger

Caption: Figure 1: Effect of 1,4-BQ on cell viability of hBM-MSCs. (a) Phase contrast micrographs of normal hBM-MSCs. (b) Phase contrast micrographs of hBM-MSCs treated with 100 [micro]M of 1,4-BQ for 24 h. (c) Dose- dependent effect of 1,4-BQ on cell viability of hBM-MSCs. Cells were treated with 1, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 200, 500, and 1000 [micro]M of 1, 4-BQ for 24 h. Cell viability of hBM- MSCs was determined by MTT assay. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA analysis followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison. *P < 0.05, compared with control.

Caption: Figure 5: Protein expression of HSP27 and Vimentin verified by Western blot analysis. Left: blots were incubated with commercial antibodies against HSP27 and Vimentin, respectively. GAPDH was used as an internal control. Right: mean densitometry (optical density x area) of the antibody-antigen reaction shown on the blots. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA analysis followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison. *P < 0.05, compared to control. (a) HSP27. (b) Vimentin.

Caption: Figure 6: Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of the mRNA levels of HSP27, Vimentin, and RAP1GDS1 in hBM-MSCs. Results were normalized to internal control GAPDH. Data were represented as means [+ or -] SD (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA and Dunnett's multiple comparison. *P < 0.05, compared with control. (a) HSP27. (b) Vimentin. (c) RAP1GDS1.

Caption: Figure 7: Localization examination of HSP27 in hBM-MSCs by immunofluorescence. Alexa Fluor 633 (red)-labeled secondary antibody was used to detect HSP27 expression and the nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue). The expression of HSP27 was mainly detected in the cytoplasm of hBM-MSCs (x200).

Caption: Figure 8: Localization examination of Vimentin in hBM-MSCs by immunofluorescence. Alexa Fluor 514 (green)- labeled secondary antibody was used to detect Vimentin expression and the nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue). The expression of Vimentin was mainly detected in the cytoplasm of hBM-MSCs (x200).
Table 1: Differentially expressed proteins in 1,4-BQ
treated hBM-MSCs identified by LC-MS/MSa.

Spot           Protein name            UniProt ID

1878           Alpha-actin-1             P68133

1874            Beta-actin               P60709

1997             Gelsolin                P06396

2550   Creatine kinase M-type (M-CK)     P06732

2665           Beta-enolase              P13929

4590     Transcription elongation        Q15369
          factor B polypeptide 1

4905         Isoform 1 of 26S
           proteasome non-ATPase        Q99460-1
           regulatory subunit 1

SS81     Ragulator complex protein       Q9Y2Q5
                  LAMTOR2

4027        Isoform 4 of Crumbs         P82279-4
            homolog 1 precursor

4644       Translocon-associated         P51571
           protein subunit delta

5261      TAR DNA-binding protein        Q13148
                    43
             Isoform Short of

4467     Proteasome subunit alpha       P25786-1
                  type 1

4414         Ribose-phosphate            P11908
            pyrophosphokinase 2

4343         Apolipoprotein L2           Q9BQE5

4336           Transaldolase             P37837

4186         Lupus La protein            P05455
              26S proteasome

4493       non-ATPase regulatory         P48556
             subunit 8 (PSMD8)

4605            Calponin-2               Q99439

4551     Glutathione S-transferase       P09488
               Ml isoform 2

3604     Heat shock protein 90 kDa       P14625
               beta member 1

1553             Vimentin                P08670

1070     Heat shock 70 kDa protein       P11021
                     5

1339          Rapl GTPase-GDP            P52306
         dissociation stimulator 1

1166      Heat shock cognate 71         P11142-1
                kDa protein

1235             Copine-1                Q99829

1290             Copine-3                075131

1013     Collagen alpha-l(I) chain       P02452

2035       Superoxide dismutase          P00441
                  [Cu-Zn]

2015             Ferritin                Q6S4P3

1232       Heat shock protein 60         P10809

1983     Putative uncharacterized        Q5HYI3
           protein DKFZp686N1815

1915     Heat shock 27 kDa protein       P04792

Spot             Function             Unique peptide   Theoretical
                                          count           MW/pI

1878   Involved in various types of         2           42.1/5.23
              cell motility

1874   Involved in various types of         3           41.7/5.29
              cell motility

1997     Actin-modulating protein           3           85.7/5.90

2550    Creatine metabolic process          2           43.1/6.77

2665            Glycolysis                  2           47.0/7.58

4590     Transcription regulation           1           12.5/4.74

4905
         Degradation of proteins            2          105.8/5.25

SS81       Signal transduction              2           13.5/5.30

4027       Cell-cell signaling              1          104.2/5.45

4644      Intracellular protein             5           20.2/5.53
                transport

5261     transcription regulation           5           44.7/5.85

4467             Immunity                   11          29.6/6.15

4414     Nucleotide biosynthesis            1           34.8/6.15

4343         Lipid transport                4           37.1/6.28

4336     Energy reserve metabolic           4           37.5/6.36
                 process

4186        tRNA modification               2           46.8/6.68

4493     Degradation of proteins            2           32.6/6.85

4605       Regulation of actin              1           33.7/6.94
          filament-based process

4551     Glutathione transferase            2           21.3/7.67
                 activity
         Molecular chaperone that

3604   functions in the processing          2           92.5/4.76
        and transport of secreted
                 proteins
1553    Structural constituent of
               cytoskeleton                 8           53.7/5.06

1070   Facilitating the assembly of
            multimeric protein
           complexes inside the
          endoplasmic reticulum

1339       Stirmdating GDP/GTP
          exchange reaction of a
              group of small                2           66.3/5.21

1166     GTP-binding proteins (G
                proteins)
         Acting as a repressor of           2           70 9/5 37
        transcriptional activation

1235       Membrane trafficking             3           59.1/5.52

1290       Membrane trafficking             3           60.1/5.60

1013      Leukocyte migration.              5          138.9/5.60

2035       Platelet activation              2           15.9/5.70
           Destroying radicals

2015        Cellular iron ion               1           21.3/5.70
               homeostasis
          Preventing misfolding
1232    under stress conditions in          1           61.1/5.70
         the mitochondrial matrix

1983           Proteolysis                  1           17.6/5.83

1915   Involved in stress resistance        4           22.8/5.98
          and actin organization

Spot   Ratio of spot volume (P-value)

         10 [micro](M       25 [micro](M        50 [micro](M

1878   -2.0354 (0.0090)                        -1.8674(0.0001)

1874   -1.7746(0.0062)     -1.7694(0.0016)     -1.9527(0.0002)

1997   -3.0914 (0.0028)

2550   -3.0392 (0.0055)

2665   1.7390 (0.0080)

4590                      -1000000 (0.0033)

4905
                          -1.8721 (0.0251)

SS81                      -1.7177 (0.0132)

4027                       -3.2976(0.0081)

4644                      -1000000 (0.0001)

5261                       1.6949 (0.0095)

4467                       1.6421 (0.0024)

4414                       2.1110 (0.0023)

4343                       1.8877 (0.0008)

4336                       1.5618 (0.0050)

4186                       1.6213 (0.0011)

4493                       1.5107 (0.0102)

4605                      -1000000 (0.0000)

4551                       1.9390 (0.0193)

3604                                          -1.5504 (0.0101)

1553
                                               2.0727 (0.0015)

1070

1339

                                              -1.57169 (0.0109)

1166

                                               1 5630 (0 0144)

1235                                          -1.6085 (0.0039)

1290                                          -2.0902 (0.0022)

1013                                           1.8513 (0.0071)

2035                                           1.9264 (0.0050)

2015                                           2.0167 (0.0001)

1232                                          -1.5792 (0.0180)

1983                                           1.6203 (0.0389)

1915                                          -1.6224 (0.0014)

Figure 2: Expression of CD29, CD34, CD44, and CD45 on the surface
of hBM-MSCs. Flow cytometry analysis was performed to detect the
CD29+/CD44+/CD34-/CD45-cell population on day 14 of cell culture.
(a) Expression of CD29, CD44, CD34, and CD45 on hBM-MSCs cells from
each group. (b) M1 marker gates of the CD29-/CD44-/CD34-/CD45-
cells and M2 marker gates of the CD29+/CD44+/CD34+/CD45+
cells. (c) The percentage of the CD29+/CD29--, CD44+/CD44-,
CD34+,CD34-, and CD45+/CD45- cells is indicated within the
hBM-MSCs cell population.

Sample ID: CD29   Gate: G1

Gated events: 9670   Total events: 10000

Marker   Left, Right          Events   % Gated % Total

All          1,        9910    9670        100.00        96.70
M1           1,         10      50          0.52          0.5
M2           10,       9910    9621         99.49        96.21

Sample ID: CD44   Gate: G1

Gated events: 9618   Total events: 10000

Marker   Left, Right          Events   % Gated % Total

All          1,        9910    9618        100.00        96.18
M1           1,         10      12          0.12         0.12
M2           10,       9910    9606         99.88        96.06

Sample ID: CD34   Gate: G1

Gated events: 9635   Total events: 10000

Marker   Left, Right          Events   % Gated % Total

All          1,        9910    9635        100.00        96.35
M1           1,         10     9534         98.95        95.34
M2           10,       9910    102          1.06         1.02

Sample ID: CD45   Gate: G1

Gated events: 9561   Total events: 10000

Marker   Left, Right          Events   % Gated % Total

All          1,        9910    9561        100.00        95.61
M1           1,         10     9546         99.84        95.46
M2           10,       9910     16          0.17         0.16

Figure 3: Protein profile difference between
1,4-BQ-treated and control hBM-MSCs. (a) Comparison of protein
profiles by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis between 1,4-BQ
treated hBM-MSCs and control. Spots that were differentially
expressed were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. (b) Identified proteins with
differential expression were cytoplasmic, nuclear, membrane-bound,
or secreted. (c) Proteins identified by LCMS/MS are involved in
metabolism (25.00%), cell stress response (15.63%), cell skeleton
(12.5%), transcription regulation (12.5%), membrane trafficking
(6.25%), signal transduction (6.25%), and miscellaneous function
(21.88%).

(b)

Membrane,     9.38%
Secreted     15.63%
Nuclear,     18.75%
Cytoplasm,   56.25%

(c)

Membrane trafficking,        6.25%
Transcription regulation,   12.50%
Cell skeleton,              12.50%
Signal transduction,         6.25%
Cell stress response,       15.63%
Metabolism,                 25.00%
Miscellaneous function,     21.88%

Note: Table made from pie chart.

Figure 4: Identification of HSP27 by using LC-MS/MS. The reporter
ion signals of LFDQAFGLPR were a peptide fragment of HSP27

b                      y

--       1    L   10     --
261.16   2    F   9    1050.54
376.19   3    D   8    903.47
504.25   4    Q   7    788.44
575.28   5    A   6    660.38
722.35   6    F   5    589.35
779.37   7    G   4    442.28
892.46   8    L   3    385.26
989.51   9    P   2    272.17
--       10   R   1    175.12
COPYRIGHT 2017 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Wu, Wei; Zhang, Ling; Zhang, Min; Zhu, Li-Jin; Xia, Hai-Ling; Lou, Jian-Lin; Liu, Jia-Ren; Xiao, Yun
Publication:BioMed Research International
Article Type:Report
Date:Jan 1, 2017
Words:7406
Previous Article:Mechanical Characterisation and Biomechanical and Biological Behaviours of Ti-Zr Binary-Alloy Dental Implants.
Next Article:Antioxidant Activity and Inhibitory Potential of Cistus salviifolius (L.) and Cistus monspeliensis (L.) Aerial Parts Extracts against Key Enzymes...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters