Printer Friendly

Promotion/Retention of Students in Grades K-8, 2000-2001. E&R Report.

To read the full text of this article, click here: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED466487

The 2000-2001 school year marked the first year of implementation of the Wake County Board of Education's Promotion and Intervention Policy at grades K through 8. It also marked the first year of the state's requirement that third, fifth, and eight grade students demonstrate grade level proficiency on the state End-of-Grade tests in reading and mathematics. This report provides results of the implementation of the Promotion and Intervention policy for students in grades K-8. Requiring students to master the content of one grade level before being promoted to the next sounds simple enough, but implementing this policy turned out to be complex for a variety of student characteristic and data collection reasons. By mid-September of the 2000-2001 school year, most students had been assigned to their grade levels, and data had become more reliable. The first year of implementation of the policy resulted in a slightly higher rate of retention than in the past, but a figure lower than the estimated doubling of the rate of retention predicted on the basis of a pilot study in seven schools. Overall, 89.1% of students in grades K-8 were promoted, 5.1% were retained, and 5.7% withdrew from the WCPSS. The rate of retention was highest at the lowest grades. Most students (91.9%) eventually passed the EOG standard, but 4,284 students did not meet the EOG standard for promotion and subsequently had their promotion standard considered by a waiver review committee. Females were slightly more likely to be promoted than males, and White and Asian/Pacific Islander students were more likely to be promoted than Black and Hispanic students. Students from low income groups were less likely to be promoted, at only 83.6%. Implications for planning and instruction are discussed. (SLD)

COPYRIGHT 2002 U.S. Department of Education
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Kaase, Kristopher
Publication:ERIC: Reports
Date:Jan 1, 2002
Words:366
Previous Article:Organizational Learning, Change and Socialization. Symposium.
Next Article:University HRD Programs. Symposium.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |