Printer Friendly

Productivity in selected industries and government services in 1986.

Productivity in selected industries and government services in 1986

Productivity Reports ARTHUR S. HERMAN Labor productivity, as measured by output per employee hours, increased in 1986 in more than three-fourths of the industries for which current data are available. In comparison, less than two-thirds of the industries posted gains in 1985.

This article updates to the most current year all indexes included in the industry roductivity measurement program of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. It extends the measures through 1986, and includes data on industry multifactor productivity measures through 1985 and data on Federal, State, and local government productivity measures through 1986.

Table 1 shows labor productivity trends in the industries measured by the Bureau and includes measures for additional industries: cotton and synthetic broad woven fabrics; industrial inorganic chemicals; industrial organic chemicals; nonelectric heating equipment; semiconductors and related devices; retail hardware stores; department stores; and automotive repair shops.(1)

Changes in industry labor productivity

Manufacturing. Among major manufacturing industries, both motor vehicles and steel registered small productivity gains in 1986. In motor vehicle manufacturing, productivity grew by 1.8 percent. Although output fell 2.2 percent in 1986, mainly because of a decline in the automobile segment of the industry, employee hours fell even more, dropping 4.0 percent. The productivity gain was the sixth consecutive one in this industry. In steel manufacturing, productivity was up 1.7 percent, as output dropped 5.9 percent, while employee hours fell 7.6 percent. Demand was off from automobile firms and from capital goods producers, such as a the agricultural and industrial continued to eliminate less efficient plant and equipment. Steel manufacturing has recorded four consecutive annual increases in productivity.

A number of important manufacturing industries posted substantial gains in productivity in 1986, including petroleum refining (12.0 percent); sawmills (11.0 percent); and paper, paperboard, and pulp mills (7.1 percent). These industries recorded output growth in 1986. In petroleum refining, output was up 5.8 percent as demand was aided by a sharp drop in the price of petroleum products and hours fell off 5.6 percent as a number of less efficient refineries were closed. Sawmills posted an output gain of 11.5 percent, as a result of increased demand from the single-family housing market, while hours grew 0.5 percent. In the paper industry, output gained 5.9 percent, as demand was stimulated by favorable overall economic conditions, while hours were off 1.1 percent.

Only a small number of manufacturing industries registered productivity declines in 1986. These were metal forming machine tools (--8.7 percent); steel foundries and nonwool yarn mills (both --3.9 percent); oilfield machinery (--3.4 percent); gay iron foundries (--1.9 percent); and cigarettes (--0.2 percent).

Mining. Among the mining industries, coal mining had a productivity gain of 8.2 percent based on a small output increase of 0.3 percent, while hours fell 7.3 percent. Between 1985 and 1986, demand for coal remained fairly stable while the industry continued to close less efficient mines. Nonmetallic minerals posted a productivity advance of 1.0 percent; output dropped 0.6 percent, as declining demand from the agricultural chemicals market more than offset a gain from the construction materials market, and hours fell 1.6 percent. In copper mining (recoverable metal), productivity was up by a large 22.5 percent, as output grew 4.2 percent while hours dropped 14.9 percent. On the other hand, iron mining (usable ore) had a decline in productivity of 6.3 percent; output fell 20.6 percent because of a continued decline in demand from the steel industry, while hours dropped 15.2 percent.

Transportation and utilities. Productivity changes were mostly positive among transportation and utility industries. Railroads had a large productivity gain of 11.0 percent; output grew 1.9 percent while employee hours continued to decline (--8.2 percent). In air transportation, productivity in electric utilities grew 1.2 percent, with output up 2.2 percent and hours up 1.1 percent. On the other hand, gas utilities posted a productivity decline of 8.3 percent; output fell 11.1 percent partly because of a warm winter and the shift of some customers to cheaper oil heat. Employee hours were off 3.1 percent.

Trade and services. Productivity changes were mixed among the trade and service industries. Furniture, home furnishings, and equipment stores posted a 7.8-percent productivity gain, as output grew 9.3 percent while hours were up 3.8 percent. The demand for furniture and appliances was up because of the expansion in new and existing home sales, while home electronics also had a good year, fueling the large output gain. The appliance, radio, and tv component of this industry recorded an 11.0-percent productivity gain. Apparel and accessory stores had a 7.0-percent gain in productivity; output was up 9.1 percent, as sales were good in all types of apparel stores; and all person hours grew 2.0 percent. Changes in productivity among the components of this industry ranged from 10.1 percent in shoe stores to --0.8 percent in family clothing stores. The gasoline service station industry posted a 3.3-percent gain as output grw 5.0 percent, helped by lower gasoline prices, while hours were up 1.6 percent. Both eating and drinking places and liquor stores had 3.0-percent productivity increases, while new car dealers had a gain of 1.5 percent, and beauty and barber shops grew 0.2 percent.

Productivity declines were posted by a number of trade and service industries. There was a decline of 1.3 percent in retail food stores. Output was up 1.8 percent while hours grew 3.1 percent, as the industry continued to provide more service-oriented operations such as delicatessens, salad bars, in-store bakeries, pharmacies, and photo departments. Other industries with declines in productivity were laundries and cleaning services (--2.4 percent), drug stores (--3.3 percent), and hotels and motels (--4.8 percent).

Trends, 1981-86

A large majority of the measured industries recorded average annual gains in productivity over the 1981-86 period. Copper mining (recoverable metal) posted the highest rate of growth in the last 5 years, averaging 19.1 percent a year. Intense international competition in recent years has resulted in improved mining methods and the shutdown of older, less efficient mines. The radio and television receiving sets industry experienced the second highest rate of gain during the 1981-86 period--14.4 percent per year. Productivity growth in this highly competitive industry was aided by the widespread use of automated production technology and the closing of less efficient plants. Other industries with high rates of gain during 1981-86 include: alkalies and chlorine (13.3 percent, 1981-85); primary copper, lead, and zinc (11.2 percent); wet corn milling (11.2 percent, 1981-85); iron mining (usable ore) (11.0 percent); and railroad transportation (revenue traffic) (10.4 percent).

However, several industries showed marked declines in productivity in the 1981-86 period. Among these, the oilfield machinery industry recorded the greatest falloff, declining at a rate of 6.0 percent. The industry faced a sharp drop in demand for its products stemming from a downward movement in the price of crude oil. Falling output coupled with the industry's made-to-order, labour intensive operations, aggravated the productivity decline. Additionally, the gas utilties industry was also among those industries that had a marked falloff in productivity (--4.3 percent annually). During the 1981-86 period, the output of this industry fell at a rate of 5.0 percent because of a decline in average use per customer. There was only a minimal decline in employee hours due to an increase in the number of customers. Thus, productivity declined substantially. Other industries with substantial declines were: rice milling (--3.7 percent, 1981-85); metal forming machine tools (--3.3 percent); beauty and barber shops (--2.5 percent); and drug stores (--2.2 percent).

Industry multifactor productivity

Measures of multifactor productivity are presented for the steel and motor vehicles industries. These industry measures are the first to be published from the Bureau's industry multifactor productivity project. This is an ongoing program and measures for additional industries will be published as they are completed.(2)

In multifactor productivity measures, output is related to combined inputs of labor, capital, and intermediate purhcases. Multifactor productivity is equal to output per hour and intermediate purchases per hour (materials, fuels, electricity, and services). These effects are measured as the change in the nonlabor to labor input ratio, weighted by the nonlabor input's share in total output. The capital effect, for example, is the change in the capital-labor ratio weighted by capital's share in output. Multifactor productivity measures still show the effect of many influences such as economies of scale, capacity utilization, slill and effort of the work force, and technological change.

The multifactor measures for the steel and motor vehicles industries are available through 1985. Because these measures were greatly affected by cyclical changes in the economy, the periods from the last peak forward are analyzed here, rather than the last 5 years as done for the other measures. For the steel industry, the period 1979-85 is discussed while for the motor vehicles industry, 1978-85 is covered. Table 2 shows multifactor productivity and related data for these periods for the two industries.

Steel. Multifactor productivity in the steel industry grew at an average annual rate of 3.4 percent per year between 1979 and 1985, as out put fell at a rate of 6.1 percent, and combined inputs fell more steeply at a 9.2-percent rate. This performance can be compared with growth of 4.8 percent per year in output per hour in steel manufacturing over the same period. The difference between the growth rate of labor productivity (output per hour) and that of multifactor productivity was attributable to a 0.3-percent average annual growth in the capital effect (the change in the capital-labor ratio weighted by the capital share of about 15 percent) and a 1.1-percent intermediate purchases effect (the change in the ratio of intermediate purchases to labor weighted by the intermediate purchases share of about 50 percent).

Some large, integrated mills with obsolescent plant and equipment closed, as the restructuring of the industry continued during the 1978-85 period, while diffusion of technological changes such as the electric arc furnace and the continuous casting steel making method increased. Labor hours fell faster (--10.4 percent) than capital (--3.2 percent) or intermediate purchases (--8.8 percent) in this period, and both the capital-labor and intermediate purchases-labor ratios increased.

Motor vehicles. Multifactor productivity in the motor vehicles and equipment industry grew at an average annual rate of 0.8 percent per year between 1978 and 1985, as output gains averaged 1.7 percent per year and combined inputs rose at a 0.9-percent rate. Labor productivity (output per hour) grew by 3.5 percent per year. The difference between the growth of labor poductivity and that of multifactor productivity was almost entirely attributable to the intermediate purchases effect. Changes in the capital-labor ratio were so slight as to have virtually no effect on labor productivity over the period. Both labor and capital declined during the period, while intermediate purchases increased. Between 1978 abd 1985, the intermediate purchases effect made up the entire difference between labor productivity and multifactor productivity and, in fact, was a larger source of the growth in labor productivity than was multifactor productivity.

Government productitiy

Measures of output per employee year for the Federal Government and selected State and local government services are included here for the first time. Data are presented from fiscal years 1981-86 for most series and are shown in table 3.(3)

Federal. Output per employee year increased 1.7 percent in fiscal 1986 in the measured sample of Federal Government organizations. This gain reflected a 2.3-percent increase in output and a 0.6-percent increase in employee years. The 1986 productivity rate surpassed the 1985 rate of 0.7 percent.

The measure covers a sample of Federal agencies drawn from 60 agencies and representing 380 organizational units in fiscal 1986. The organizations included 2.0 million executive branch civilian employees representing representing 68 percent of the total Federal civilian labor force. Agency employee coverage ranged from 100 percent to 1.2 percent.

The Federal organizational units are divided into 28 functional groups based on similarity of tasks performed (for example, auditing, medical, personnel, and transportation) to better identify and understand the forces which effect Federal productivity. The change in output per employee years for the 28 functions in 1986 ranged from an increase of 8.4 percent for regulation compliance and enforcement to a decline of 7.5 percent for traffic management. Productivity increased in 19 functions and decreased in 9.

The regulation compliance and enforcement funtion includes 64 organizations and enforced Federal rules, regulations, and laws in 1986. Organizational examples include coal mine inspection, hazardous substance response, customs, and consumer product safety. The 8.4-percent increase in productivity in this function in 1986 was driven by a 9.1-percent increase in output; labor increased 0.7 percent. The 1985 increase in productivity was 2.8 percent.

The traffic management function, which includes those organizations responsible for arranging for the movement of people and goods, showed a 7.5-percent drop in productivity in 1986. Both output and employee years declined in 1986 but the 8.1-percent decrease in output exceeded the 0.7-percent drop in employment. Each of the three organizational units comprising this function showed decreasing output in 1986.

The postal service function, the largest of the 28 functions in terms of employees, includes only a single organization, the U.S. Postal Service. In fiscal 1986, it productivity grew at 1.3 percent, up from 0.4 percent in 1985. During 1986,

TABLE: TABLE 3. Productivity indexes(1) for government, 1981-86

TABLE: sic Functional group 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986

TABLE: Code

TABLE: Average annual

TABLE: Percentage change, percent change,

TABLE: 1985-86 1981-86 output increased 4.4 percent while labor increased 3.0 percent.

Trends, 1981-86. Over the 1981-86 period, output per employee year in the Federal sample rose at an average annual rate of 1.0 percent. The year-to-year changes in productivity ranged from a low of 0.2 percent in 1984 to 1.7 percent in 1986. The overall increase in Federal productivity reflects and average rise of 2.3 percent in output and a 1.3 percent increase in labor input. Output increased annually at rates ranging from 1.2 percent in 1982 to 2.7 percent in 1985. Annual rates of change in employee years ranged from a drop of 0.2 percent in 1982 to an increase of 2.1 percent in 1984.

From 1981 to 1986, productivity trends for the 28 functions ranged from 6.2-percent annual growth for communications to a 7.2-percent annual decline for electric power production and distribution.

Communications had the highest average annual increase in productivity (6.2 percent) of any of the 28 functions. In 1983 and 1984, productivity increased 7.0 percent and 9.0 percent, respectively. The six organizations accounting fo r this function in 1986 are in the Department of Defense, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the Department of State.

The function with the second largest average annual increase in productivity over the last 5 years is finance and accounting (4.8 percent), which includes internal government services, such as treasury bill and bond sales to the public. In 1986, 18 organizations were included in this function. Finance and accounting productivity had been driven by the automation of many of the routine processing operations. In one organization that serves the public, productivity doubled in 1 year as output mushroomed, operations were mechanized, and employment was held roughly constant.

From 1981-86, the electric power production and distribution function registered the largest decrease in productivity of the 28 functions. During this period, productivity has decreased in every year but one, which is a reflection of sharply decreasing output. Employment has been cut back over the past 5 years, but the decrease in output has exceeded the cut in input by a wide margin.

State and local services

Electric Power. State and local government electric power output per employee year increased 0.5 percent in 1985, the last year for which data are available, as output and employment increased 2.9 percent and 2.5 percent, respectively. In 1984, output and employment also increased, but productivity dropped as employment grew more rapidly than output. However, from 1981 to 1985, productivity declined at an average annual rate of 1.4 percent as employment increased at a more rapid rate than output (3.0 percent versus 1.5 percent).

Unemployment insurance. State unemployment insurance productivity increased 4.8 percent in fiscal 1986 as output dropped 3.1 percent and inputs were cut 7.4 percent. In 1985, productivity increased 2.9 percent and output and employment dropped 1.2 percent and 4.1 percent, repectively. The decrease in output over the past 3 years is a reflection of decreasing unemployment in the Nation and the resulting drop in unemployment insurance claims and payments. Over the 1981-86 period, productivity fell at a rate of 0.3 percent, while output declined at an average annual rate of 5.3 percent, and labor decreased at a 5.0-percent rate.

State sales of alcoholic beverages. Output per employee year in States sales of alcoholic beverages dropped 1.6 percent in 1985, the latest year for which data are available, as output and input dropped 2.6 percent and 1.1 percent, respectively. In 1984, productivity increased as output and employment dropped. The drop in output and input in 1984 and 1985 is a continuation of trends that started in 1978, trends which reflect decreasing demand for alcoholic beverages, and a shift in several States from government to private sector operations. Over the 1981-85 period, productivity increased at a 0.9-percent average rate as employment fell at a higher rate than output (3.2 percent versus 2.4 percent.)

A full report, productivity Measures for Selected Industries and Government Services, BLS Bulletin 2296, is available from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. Price $9.50.

TABLE: Table 1. Indexes of output per employee hour in selected industries, 1981-86, and percent changes, 1985-86 and 1981-86 (1977=100)
 TABLE: Sic Code(1) Industry 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986(2)
 TABLE: Percent Average annual
 TABLE: change, parent change,
 TABLE: 1985-86 1981-86


(1) As defined in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1972, published by the Office of Management and Budget.

(2) Preliminary.

TABLE: Table 1. Continued -- Indexes of output per employee hour in selected industries, 1981-86, and percent changes, 1985-86 and 1981-86 (1977=100)
 TABLE: sic Code(1) Industry 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986(2)
 TABLE: Percent Average annual
 TABLE: change, percent change,
 TABLE: 1985-86 1981-86


(1) As defined in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1972, published by the Office of Management and Budget.

(2) Preliminary

TABLE: Table 1. Continued -- Indexes of output per employee hour in selected industries, 1981-86, and percent changes, 1985-86 and 1981-86 (1977=200)
 TABLE: sic Code(1) Industry 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986(2)
 TABLE: Percent Average annual
 TABLE: change, percent change,
 TABLE: 1985-86 1981-86


(1) As defined in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1972 published by the Office of Management and Budget.

(2) Preliminary.

TABLE: Table 2. Multifactor and related productivity Indexes(1) for selected Industries, 1978 or 1979-85 (1977-100)
 TABLE: sic
 TABLE: Code Industry and measure 1978 1978 1980 1981 1982 1983
 TABLE: 1984 1985(2) Average annual
 TABLE: percent change


(1) The output measures underlying the productivity indexes relate to the total net production of the industry. They do not relate to the specific output of any single factor of production.

(2) Preliminary.

TABLE: Table 3. Productivity indexes(1) for government, 1981-86

TABLE: sic Functional group 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986

TABLE: Code
 TABLE: Average annual
 TABLE: Percent change, percent change,
 TABLE: 1985-86 1981-86


(1) Output per employee year.

(2) Not available.
COPYRIGHT 1988 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1988 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Herman, Arthur S.
Publication:Monthly Labor Review
Date:Apr 1, 1988
Words:3355
Previous Article:An analysis of unemployment and other labor market indicators in 10 countries.
Next Article:Evaluating workplace injury and illness records; testing a procedure.
Topics:


Related Articles
Industry output and employment through the end of the century.
Multifactor productivity in U.S. manufacturing, 1949-83.
Productivity in the carburetors, pistons, and valves industry.
Productivity continued to rise in many industries during 1987.
Productivity in industry and government in 1988.
Productivity in industry and government, 1989.
Productivity in industry and government, 1990.
Productivity in industry and government: 1973-91.
Comparative indicators.
Comparative indicators.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters