Printer Friendly

Productivity assessment of an Ultisol contaminated with crankcase oil in Abakaliki Southeastern, Nigeria.

INTRODUCTION

With the advent of technology and industrialization, modern societies developed lubricants, fuels and solvents, pesticides, herbicides and preservatives [21]. The soil is a sink for these chemicals which become contaminants when they are applied to the soil [29] to serve some specific purposes such as to control pest or weeds [26]. Some of the waste compounds are toxic in very small concentrations so that once the materials enter the soil, they become part of a biological cycle that affects all forms of life. Contamination of a soil with toxic substances can degrade its productive capacity to provide habitat for crops [15].

In Nigeria and at Abakaliki in particular, the common sources of soil contamination are house hold wastes, agricultural wastes and crankcase oil [26]. The impact of contamination of crankcase oil in the environment is widespread [2] and yet adequate attention has not been given to it [32]. For instance, presence of spent lubricant oil in soil increases bulk density, decreases water holding capacity and aeration propensity [3]. The authors also noted reduced nitrogen, phosphorus, calcium, magnesium, potassium and increased levels of heavy metals in soil contaminated with spent oil.

In most cities and towns in Nigeria, farmers or residents grow vegetables, maize [34] or any other edible crops around or within crankcase oil contaminated environment without much concern about its productivity. There has been a report of general unsatisfactory seed germination, growth and yield in soil contaminated with spent lubricant oil. Agbogidi and Enujeke [3] reported low yield and decreased growth of plant grown in spent lubricant oil contaminated soil. These negative observations were further corroborated by other researchers such as Okonokhuaet al. [33] including Agbogidi and Nweke [4] and Wang et al. [41].

There are numerous mechanic workshops in Abakaliki urban environment and rural areas. Our traditional approach of food production without proper and sound evaluation of soil as most common in developing countries [1] can no longer be relied upon for sustainable production. It is on this basis that there is need to carry out a research on crankcase oil contaminated soil.

This would not only raise awareness on the degradation of soil lay a combined practice of crankcase oil contamination and tillage but could assist critical stakeholders, farmers, agronomists, and other land users as well as policy makers to develop best soil management practices that would enhance durable productivity. The objectives of this work were (1) study crankcase oil contaminated tilled soil (2) assess its productivity using maize as a test crop for three consecutive years in Abakaliki agroecological environment of Nigeria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental Site:

The research work was carried out for three years at the Teaching and Research farm of the Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources Management, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki. The area is located by latitude 06004/N and longitude 08[degrees]65/E of southeast in the derived Savannah agricultural zone of Nigeria. The pattern of rainfall observed in the area is bimodal and is spread from April-July and September-November with a break in August usually referred to as "August break". The minimum rainfall is 1700 mm while maximum is 2000 mm with a mean of 1800 mm. The temperatures are 27[degrees]C and 31[degrees]C for minimum and maximum, respectively. The relative humidity is 60% during the dry period and 80% in the rainy season [35]. The soil of the area is derived from successive marine deposits from cretaceous and tertiary periods. According to Federal Department of Agricultural Land Resources (FDALR) [19], Abakaliki agro-zone lies within "Asu River" and is associated with Olive brown sandy shale, fine grained sandstones and mudstones. The soil is shallow with unconsolidated parent material (Shale residuum) within 1 m of the soil surface. The soil belongs to the order ultisol and is classified as Typichaplustult [20].

The vegetation of the areas is primarily derived Savanna with bush regrowth and scanty economic trees. The site had history of previous cultivation of maize (Zea mays L.) and cassava (Manihot spp.). There is growth of native vegetation such as Tridaxspp, panicum maximum and other herbs and shrubs.

Fields Methods:

A land area of 0.04ha was cleared of existing vegetation and used for the experiment. The debris left after clearing was removed without burning from the site. 50%of crankcase oil equivalent to 50,000mg[kg.sup.-1] was applied to the plot each year for three cropping seasons. Traditional hoe was used to till the soil flattwo weeks after oil application. There were no beds. Maize (Oba super II) hybrid variety was used as a test crop. The maize seeds were obtained from Ebonyi State Agricultural Development Programme (EBADEP) office at OnuebonyiIzzi, Abakaliki. The maize seeds were planted at two seeds per hole and at 25 cm x 75 cm planting distance. Two weeks after germination (WAG), the maize seedlings were thinned down to one per hole, weak ones and those which did not germinate were replaced by replanting. This gave a total of approximately 53,000 plants per hectare. Fertilizer, NPK 15:15:15 was applied at rate of 400kg[ha.sup.-1] to the plot two weeks after planting at 5cm depth and 10-15cm away from plants for the three cropping seasons. Weeds were removed by using hand hoe at two weekly intervals till harvest. Grain yield was collected at harvest by harvesting the cobs when the husks had dried, dehusked, threshed, dried and grain yield determined by weighing to constant weight.

Soil Sampling:

Soil samples were collected with cores and soil auger. Soil samples were sampled at 0-20 cm depth each year at twelve points. The core soil samples were used to determine physical properties of soil while auger samples were for determination of particle size distribution (PSD) and chemical properties.

Laboratory Methods:

Bulk density was determined using the core method of Blake and Hartage [14]. The method described by Obi [31] was used in determination of available water capacity. Total porosity was calculated as described by Obi [31]. Soil pH determination was done using soil/water solution ratio of 1:2.5. Soil pH values were read off using Beckman Zaromatic pH meter [37]. Organic carbon determination was done as described in Page et al. [36]. Available phosphorus was extracted using Bray-2 method as described in Page et al. [36]. Exchangeable calcium and magnesium were extracted according to Mba [25] while potassium and sodium were extracted using flame photometer. Cation exchange capacity was determined in1N N[H.sub.4]OAC. Effective cation exchangeable capacity was determined using summation method as follows:

ECEC = TEB+TEA (1)

Where:

ECEC = Effective cation Exchange capacity (Cmol[kg.sup.-1] soil)

TEB = Total Exchangeable bases (Cmol[kg.sup.-1] soil)

TEA = Total exchangeable acidity (Cmol[kg.sup.-1] soil)

Data Analysis:

Correlation and regression analysis were used to determine relationships between soil properties and grain yield of maize using Statistical Analysis System (1985).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Initial Properties of Soil:

Table 1 shows some initial properties of soil at the beginning of the study. Particle size distribution (PSD) analysis indicates that the fractions generally varied but textural class was sandy loam. The pH in KCl was 5.1 and this implies that the soil was slightly acidic [20]. The percentage organic carbon and available phosphorus were respectively 1.84% and 4.70 mg[kg.sup.-1] and rated low accordingly to Landon [24] benchmark for Nigerian soils. The soil exchange complex was strongly dominated by calcium and magnesium. This is a characteristic of a highly weathered tropical soil as obtainable in southeastern part of the country. Exchangeable sodium (Na) and potassium (K) were low [11]. The soil was medium (68%) in base saturation [8]. Cation exchange capacity (CEC) and effective cation exchangeable capacity(ECEC) were low according to the ratings of Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development benchmark for Nigerian soils [20].

Nutrient Composition of Crankcase Oil:

Nutrient Composition of Crankcase Oil is presented in Table 2. The respective values of copper (Cu), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb) and zinc (Zn) in crankcase oil were within the recommended high levels in soils [23]. The percentage organic carbon and total N were 17.3 and 6.8% respectively and rated high according to the standard set by Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources [20] for Nigerian Soils. Available phosphorus was very low with value of 0.02 mg[kg.sup.-1] [24]. The C:N ratio and total hydrocarbon (THC) were 11.38 and 33.4% (Table 2).

Some Properties of Soil after Contamination:

Table 3 shows some properties of soil after contamination. Although, the values for particle size distribution varied slightly from pre-contamination ones and across the years, the textural class remained sandy loam. Sand fraction was persistently higher than silt and clay for the three cropping seasons. Furthermore, silt fraction in pre-contamination was higher than that of contamination value and clay fraction except in 2013 season. Bulk density generally increased after first season. Bulk density was 2 and 3% higher in 2012 and 2013 than the one for 2011. Total porosity had inverse relationship with bulk density and followed its trend within the years. Available water capacity decreased by 7 and 8% respectively in 2012 and 2013 seasons when compared to first cropping season. Soil pH was higher in 2011 and decreased afterwards by 5and 8% relative to the value for 2012 and 2013 seasons. Though, it appeared there was phenomenal increase in available phosphorus in 2012 compared to 2011, the value decreased in 2013 season. This accounts for 2 and 6% increments in available phosphorus in 2012 respectively compared to 2011 and 2013 seasons. Organic carbon had same value for 2011 and 2012 study seasons and was subsequently reduced by 37% when compared to 2011 and 2012 values. Total nitrogen was higher in first season and generally decreased by 18% each in subsequent years. The exchange able cations varied across the seasons but were generally higher in first year while they decreased in 2012 and 2013 seasons. Calcium and magnesium were predominantly higher in the soil across the seasons compared to potassium and sodium, respectively. The cations were lower in the soil except potassium when compared to pre-contamination study.

High sand contents of the soil compared to other fractions could be attributed to property inherited from the parent materials than contamination and tillage. Sand content of the soils in southeastern region of Nigeria is a characteristic of sand formed on unconsolidated coastal plain and sandstone from Asu River [19]. The distribution of particle sizes gave rise to sandy loam texture. Obi [31] noted that texture was immutable and as a result could not be changed by cultural or temporary management practices. Texture has good relationship with nutrient storage and release, water retention, porosity [31] and specific surface area, soil compatibility and compressibility [38] which affect inherit productivity of soil. The increase in bulk density after first season could be attributed to continuous cultivation and contamination which caused realignment and subsequently compaction of soil particles. This finding is supported by the report of Mbah et al. that bulk density increased in hydrocarbon oil contaminated soil after cultivation. The effect of crankcase oil contamination of the soil could be severe and limiting to soil productivity due to continuous cultivation and compaction. The bulk densities across the seasons were above critical and limiting values for root proliferation and soil productivity [8,31]. Low total porosity as well as available water capacity could be adduced to be the negative implication of high bulk density of soil. Low total porosity hinders root proliferation and limits its capacity to access nutrients and water for physiological process as well as carbohydrate synthesis. Total porosity and available water capacity ranged from critical to limiting values for soil productivity [7]. The decrease in total porosity and available water capacity after first season implies that contamination and continuous tillage could impose impediments of poor aeration and moisture stress on soil and cause low productivity (Table 3). These findings validate the earlier reports by Anikwe et al. [6,9] that high bulk density reduced cumulative feeding area of roots of plants and caused poor yield of crops through poor aeration, low available moisture and nutrients.

Low soil pH obtained in the soil was attributed to utilization of nutrients by crops on one hand and impact of soil contamination and continuous till age. Vuotoe et al. [40] noted that spent lubricant oil contaminated soil had serious fertility problem as it affected soil pH and nutrient availability. Mbah [27] corroborated that continuous tillage reduced soil pH to critical levels for soil productivity. The soil pH values in those three seasons were below critical levels for soil productivity [9] and very strongly acidic. The low available phosphorus, percentage organic carbon and total nitrogen could be as a result of impact of crankcase oil contamination and already low pH of soil. These chemical properties are low according to the ratings of Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development benchmark for Nigerian soils [20]. Asadu and Akamigbo [12] pointed out that organic matter contents of the soils of the tropics was low because of high temperatures which caused rapid mineralization and negatively influenced organic carbon and total nitrogen of soil. Crankcase oil contamination with high temperature of the tropics and continuous tillage could be very depletive on soil nutrients and this would render it low in productivity. Furthermore, the soil of study was already degraded in terms of its fertility trend. On the other hand, crankcase oil contamination negatively impacted on soil and masked improvement that could have been recorded.

Exchangeable cations of calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) were predominantly higher in the soil than potassium (K) and sodium (Na) and thus are as a result of initial high values in the soil. The high values of Ca and Mg could also be attributed to inherent property of sandy loam soils and parent material. However, low exchangeable K and Na implies immobilization due to formation of complexes [5]. Exchangeable Ca and Mg are of low to medium ratings [11] while K and Na are low [22].

Grain Yield of Maize:

Table 4 and figure 1 show grain yield of maize for three seasons as influenced by continuous tillage and crankcase oil contamination. The grain yield of maize was higher in 2011 and generally decreased in subsequent seasons. The reductions in grain yield of maize in 2012 and 2013 seasons were 2 and 5% respectively in respect of 2011 yield (Table 4).

Low grain yield of maize is therefore, expected due to low trend of nutrients across the seasons (Table 3) consequent upon continuous tillage and contamination. The implication is that the maize crops had low nutrient utilization in the soil as observed by Aulakh et al. [13]. High bulk, low total porosity and poor availability of moisture would be major physical constraints to grain yield of maize. Anikwe et al. [13] earlier noted that high bulk density and low total porosity reduced root penetration and feeding area to crop which contributed to low grain yield of maize. On the other hand, Brady and Weil [15] corroborated by Agbogidi et al. emphasized that contamination of soil with hydrocarbon oil reduced productive capacity of soil and yield of crops. Grain yield of maize for the three seasons fell below high to medium values that had been obtained in southeastern states of Nigeria [28]. This implies that continuous tillage with contamination of soil with crankcase oil could impose severe productivity problem on soil and frustrate the touted fight against food insecurity in the country.

[GRAPHIC OMITTED]

Relationship between studied soil properties and grain yield of maize:

The relationships between studied soil properties and grain yield of maize are shown in Table 5. The results indicated that there were positive relationships between all studied soil properties and grain yield of maize.

The Bulk density, Available water capacity, organic carbon and soil pH had respectively highly (P<0.01) correlation coefficient and coefficient of determination with grain yield of maize. The relationships were r=0.95 and [r.sup.2] =0.89, r=0.94 and [r.sup.2]= 0.89, r =0.88 and [r.sup.2] = 0.72 and r =0.97 and [r.sup.2]= 0.94 for bulk density, available water capacity, organic carbon and soil pH with grain yield of maize. Similarly, there were r=0.50, r= 0.82 and [r.sup.2]=0.67 and r =0.59 relationships with grain yield of maize for total porosity, available phosphorus and total nitrogen, calcium and magnesium. Total nitrogen, calcium, potassium and sodium had no significant relationships with grain yield of maize.

The highly significant relationships obtained between bulk density, available water capacity, organic carbon, soilpH and grain yield of maize show that these soil properties influence soil productivity. According to Nwite [30], bulk density, available water capacity, total porosity and nutrient storage influenced productivity of soil. Obi [31] corroborated that soil physical conditions improved the productivity of soil. Furthermore, the significant relationships between total porosity, available phosphorus and exchangeable magnesium and grain yield of maize emphasize that these nutrients increase soil productivity as well as crop yield. Organic carbon, available phosphorus and magnesium are major constituents of plant materials [11]. Significant relationship between soil pH and grain yield of maize depicts the fact that it is contributory to soil productivity and enhance crop yield by creating conducive environment for availability of nutrients and their uptake by crops.

Conclusion:

The results of this study have shown that productivity of an ultisol subjected to continuous tillage and crankcase oil contamination could be assessed using physicochemical properties. Continuous tillage and crankcase oil contamination increased bulk density, reduced total porosity and available water capacity of the soil to critical and limiting values for productivity. Organic carbon, available phosphorus, nitrogen, pH and exchangeable cations were below the recommended levels for enhanced soil productivity. Continuous tillage with improper soil management practice such as advertent or inadvertent contamination with hydrocarbon oil could impose the danger of low productivity and scuttle the dream for food security. However, with good and proper management by avoidance of continuous tillage and contamination with hydrocarbon oil, productivity of the soil could be sustained at reasonable basis.

REFERENCES

[1] Adeoluwa, O.O., O.N. Sulaiman, 2012. Effect of human urine on the growth of performances of Jathropha Carcas seedlings and some soil health Indices. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, 22(2): 186-193.

[2] Adesodun, J.K., 2004. Bioremediation of an Alfisol contaminated with spent oil and its quality Assessment using micro-morphological analysis. Ph. D Thesis, University of Nigeria Nsukka, pp: 1-280.

[3] Agbodigi, O.M., E.C. Enujeke, 2012. Effects of spent motor oil on soil physiochemical properties and growth of Arachis hypogeal L. Global Bioscience and Biotechnology, 1(7): 7-74.

[4] Agbogidi, O.M., F.U. Nweke, 2005. Effects of crude oil polluted soil on the performance of Okra (Abelmoschus esculents) Moench in Delta State. African Journal of Natural Science, 8(1): 230-236.

[5] Agbogidi, O.M., P.G. Eruotor, S.O. Akparobi, 2007. Evaluation of Crude Oil Contaminated Soil on the Mineral Nutrient Elements of Maize (Zea Mays L.). Journal of Agronomy, 6(1): 188-193.

[6] Anikwe, M.A.N., C.N. Mbah, P.I. Ezeaku, V.N. Onyia, 2007. Tillage and Plastic mulch effect on soil properties and growth and yield of cocoyam (Colocasiaesculenta) on an Ultisol in southeastern Nigeria. Soil and Tillage Research, 93: 264-272.

[7] Anikwe, M.A.N., 2000. Use of Numerical Index Methods for Qualifying the Productivity of Some Soils in Southeastern Nigeria, Ph.D Thesis, University of Nigeria Nsukka, pp: 5-98.

[8] Anikwe, M.A.N., 2006. Soil Quality Assessment and Monitoring: A review of Current Research Efforts. New Generation Books, New Generation ventures Ltd, Enugu southeast, Nigeria, pp: 208.

[9] Anikwe, M.A.N., M.E. Obi, N.N. Agbim, 2003. Effect of crop and soil management practices on soil compatibility in maize and groundnut plots in Paleustulf in Southeastern Nigeria. Plant Soils, 253: 457-465.

[10] Anoliefo, G.O., K.D.E. Vwioko, 1994. Effects of spent lubricating oil on the growth of capsicum annum(L) and lycopersiconesculentum (miller). Journal of Environmental Pollution, 88: 361-364.

[11] Asadu, C.L.A., F.I. Nweke, 1999. Soils of Arable Crop Field in Sub-Saharan Africa. Focus on cassava growing Areas: Collaborative study of cassava in Africa. Working Paper No.18.Resources and Crop Management Division, IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria, pp: 182.

[12] Asadu, C.L.A., F.O.R. Akamigbo, 1990. Relative Contribution of organic matter and clay fraction to cation exchange capacity of soils in Southeastern Nigeria. Samaru Journal of Agricultural Research, 7: 17-23.

[13] Aulakh, M.S., A.K. Garg, B.S. Kabba, 2007. Phosphorus accumulation, leaching and residual effects on crop yields from long-term application in the subtropics. Soil Use and Management, 23: 417-427.

[14] Blake, G.R., K.H. Hartge, 1986. Bulk density. In. Klute, A. (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1.Physical and Mineralogical Methods. American Society. of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

[15] Brady, N.C., R.R. Weil, 2002. The Nature and Properties of Soils. New Jersey, Pearson Education, Inc. 15: 837.

[16] De la Rosa, D., F. Cardona, G. Pareque, 1981. Soil evaluation for several agricultural uses. A system developed for Mediterranean regions. An edaf. Agrob., 36: 1100-1112.

[17] Enwezor, W.O., F.J. Udo, R.A. Sobulo, 1981. Fertility status and productivity of acid sands. In: Acid sands of southeastern Nigeria. Soil Science Society of Nigeria, 1: 56-73.

[18] Federal Department of Agricultural Land Resources (FDALR) 1985. Reconnaissance Soil Survey of Anambra State, Nigeria. Soil Report, Kaduna, p: 3.

[19] Federal Department of Agricultural Land Resources (FDALR) 1987. Reconnaissance Soil Map of Nigeria. Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Abuja.

[20] Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (FMARD), 2002. Fertilizer Use and Management Practice for Crops in Nigeria: In. Aduayi, E.A., Chude, V.O., Adebusuji, B.A. and Olayiwola, S.O. (eds). Federal Fertilizer Department, Abuja, pp: 188.

[21] Geeta, T., 2015. Effect of metal sources and incubation period on Nickel and Copper speciation in polluted soils under Oxic and Anoxic environment. In Ezeaku P.I and Pawan KB (eds), Soil contamination and conservation. Discovery Publishing House PVT, Ltd, New Delhi, India.

[22] Howeler, R., 1996. Mineral nutrition in cassava. In: Mineral nutrient disorders of root crops in the pacific region. In. Cranwell, E.T., Asher, C.J. and O' Sullivan, J.N. (eds). Proceedings of the Workshop on Mineral disorders in Root Crops. Nukualofa Kingdom of Tonga, pp: 17-20.

[23] Lagos State Environmental Protection Agency (LASEPA) 2005. Lagos State Environmental Report, 3: 2833.

[24] Landon, J.R., 1991. Booker, Tropical Soil Manual. A hand book for soil survey and Agricultural Land Evaluation in Tropics and Sub Tropics, New York, John Wiley and Sons Inc. Third Avenue, USA.

[25] Mba, C.C., 2004. Selected methods for Soil, Plant and Environment Analysis. Department of Soil Science Handbook. Department of Soil Science, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, pp: 47.

[26] Mbah, C.N., P.I. Ezeaku, 2010. Physiochemical characterization of farmland affected by automobile wastes in relation to heavy metal. http://www.sciencepub.net/nature.htm; 8(10): 134-138.

[27] Mbah, C.N. 2004. Evaluation of Agricultural use and pollution potential of four animal wastes in an ultisol at Abakaliki, Southeastern, Nigeria. Ph.D Thesis, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, pp: 189.

[28] National Programme for Agriculture and Food Security (NPAFS), 2010. Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. Report of Agricultural Production Survey, pp: 76.

[29] Nwite, J.N., M.O. Alu, 2015. Effect of different levels of spent engine oil on soil properties, grain yield of maize and its heavy metal uptake in Abakaliki, South-eastern Nigeria. Global Journal of Agricultural Research, 3 (3): 1-10.

[30] Nwite, J.N., 2013. Evaluation of the Productivity of a Spent Automobile Oil-Contaminated soil Amended with Organic Wastes in Abakaliki, Southeastern Nigeria. Ph.D Thesis, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, pp: 1-127.

[31] Obi, M.E., 2000. Soil Physics. A compendium of Lectures, Nsukka, Atlanto Publishers Nigeria, pp: 148.

[32] Okolo, C.C., P.I. Ezeaku, J.N. Nwite, C.N. Mbah, M.A.N. Anikwe, 2013. Environmental and agronomic implication of the levels of heavy metal contamination of the soils along Enugu-Abakaliki major Highway in South-eastern Nigeria.Elixir Agriculture, 61: 17040-17046, ISSN: 2229-712X

[33] Okonokhua, B.O., B. Ikhajiagbe, G.O. Anoliefo, J.O. Emede, 2007. The effect of spent engine oil on soil properties and maize (Zea mays L.).Journal of Applied Science and Environmental Management, 11(3): 147-152.

[34] Onwuka, M.I., V.O. Chude, G.C. Ogwuegbu, 2012. Remediation of engine oil polluted soil using two of organic manure and their effects on maize growth. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, 22(2): 245-258.

[35] Overseas Development of Natural Resources Institute (ODNRI), 1989. Nigeria Profile of Agricultural Potential, ODA United Kingdom, p: 3.

[36] Page, A.L., R.H. Miller, D.R. Keeney, (eds), 1982. Methods of Soil Analysis. American Society of Agronomy, 2: 579-590.

[37] Peech, M., 1965. Hydrogen ion Activity. In: Black, C.A. (ed) Methods of Soil Analysis. American Society of Agronomy, 9(2): 914-926.

[38] Smith, C.W., M.A. Johnson, S.L. Loverzrantz, 1998. Assessing Soil Quality for Environmental Purposes: Role and Challenges for Soil Scientist. Journal of Environmental Quality, 26: 202-225.

[39] Statistical Analysis System (SAS), 1985. Users Guide, 1985 (ed). Statistical Systems Institute Inc. Carry NC.

[40] Vuoto, S., V.I. Peramaki, J. Kuokkanma, P. Tahaoja, 2005. Bidegradabilities of some chain soils in waste water as determined by the respirometric BOD oxitop method. Analytical and Bio-Analytical Chemistry, 381(2): 445-450.

[41] Wang, J., C.R. Jia, C.K. Wong, P.K. Wong, 2000. Characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons created in lubricant oil. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 120: 381-396.

(1) Nwite, J.N., (1) Alu, M.O. and (2) Okolo, C.C.

(2) Department of Soil Science and Environmental Management, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources Management, Ebonyi State University, P.M.B 053 Abakaliki, Ebonyi State Nigeria

(1) Department of Land Resources Management and Environmental Protection, Mekelle University, Ethiopia

Address For Correspondence:

Nwite, J.N., Department of Soil Science and Environmental Management, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources Management, Ebonyi State University, P.M.B 053 Abakaliki, Ebonyi State Nigeria E-mail: nwitejamesn@yahoo.com; Tel: +2348064764659

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).

http://creativecommons.orig/licenses/by/4.0/

Received 22 March 2016; Accepted 28 May 2016; Available online 12 June 2016
Table 1: Initial Properties of the soil
at the beginning of study

Soil properties             Unit              Value

Sand                        gk[g.sup.-1]      660
Silt                        gk[g.sup.-1]      210
Clay                        gk[g.sup.-1]      130
Textural class                                sandy loam
pH in kcl                                     5.1
Organic carbon              %                 1.84
Nitrogen                    %                 0.16
Available phosphorus        mg[kg.sup.-1]     4.70
Calcium                     cmol[kg.sup.-1]   5.20
Magnesium                   cmol[kg.sup.-1]   3.80
Sodium                      cmol[kg.sup.-1]   0.17
Potassium                   cmol[kg.sup.-1]   0.18
Base saturation             %                 68.0
Cation exchange capacity    cmol[kg.sup.-1]   10.3
Effective cation            cmol[kg.sup.-1]   7.97
exchangecapacity

Table 2: Nutrient Composition of Crankcase Oil

Nutrients               Unit            Value

Cadmium                 mg[kg.sup.-1]   15.6
Copper                  mg[kg.sup.-1]   9.1
Zinc                    mg[kg.sup.-1]   31.2
Lead                    mg[kg.sup.-1]   4.0
Organic carbon          %               17.3
Nitrogen                %               6.8
Available phosphorus    mg[kg.sup.-1]   0.02
C:N                                     11.38
Total hydrocarbon                       33.4

Table 3: Some properties of soil after contamination

Some soil properties          2011         2012         2013

Sand (g[kg.sup.-1])           710          580          650
Silt (g[kg.sup.-1])           220          300          200
Clay (g[kg.sup.-1])           80           120          150
Textural class                Sandy loam   sandy loam   sandy loam
Bulk density (g[cm.sup.-3])   1.70         1.73         1.76
Total porosity (%)            35.94        34.90        33.77
Available water               0.14         0.13         0.12
capacity ([cm.sup.-1])
pH KCL                        3.7          3.5          3.4
Available phosphorus          23.04        23.39        22.05
(mg[kg.sup.-1])
Organic carbon (%)            1.18         1.18         0.74
Nitrogen (%)                  0.17         0.14         0.14
Calcium (cmol[kg.sup.-1])     2.25         2.05         2.04
Magnesium (cmol[kg.sup.-1])   1.34         1.26         1.25
Potassium (cmol[kg.sup.-1])   0.63         0.58         0.54
Sodium (cmol[kg.sup.-1])      0.17         0.16         0.15

Table 4: Grain yield of maize

Seasons   Grain yield of maize
          (t [ha.sup.-1])

2011      1.30
2012      1.28
2013      1.24

Table 5: Relationship between studied Soil properties and grain

                                          yield of maze

Parameter                                 Regression
                                          model

Bulk density Vs grain yield of maize      Y=6.42x-2.94
Total porosity Vs grain yield of maize    Y=0.53x+0.02
Available water capacity Vs               Y=7.74x+0.30
  grain yield of maze
Soil pH Vs grain yield of maize           Y=0.27x+0.32
Organic Carbon Vs grain yield of maize    Y=0.90x-0.22
Available phosphorus Vs                   Y=1.00x+0.01
  grain yield of maize
Nitrogen Vs grain yield of maize          Y=1.06x+1.32
Calcium Vs grain yield of maize           Y=1.16x+0.03
Magnesium Vs grain yield of maize         Y=0.95x+0.18
Potassium Vs grain yield of maize         Y=1.29x+0.04
Sodium vs grain yield of maize            Y=0.08x+1.35

Parameter                                 r           [r.sup.2]

Bulk density Vs grain yield of maize      0.91 **     0.83 **
Total porosity Vs grain yield of maize    0.50 *      0.25 (ns)
Available water capacity Vs               0.94 **     0.89 **
  grain yield of maze
Soil pH Vs grain yield of maize           0.97 **     0.94 **
Organic Carbon Vs grain yield of maize    0.85 **     0.72 *
Available phosphorus Vs                   0.82 **     0.67 *
  grain yield of maize
Nitrogen Vs grain yield of maize          0.35 (ns)   0.12 (ns)
Calcium Vs grain yield of maize           0.25 (ns)   0.08 (ns)
Magnesium Vs grain yield of maize         0.59 *      0.35 (ns)
Potassium Vs grain yield of maize         0.09 (ns)   0.01
Sodium vs grain yield of maize            0.39 (ns)   0.15 (ns)

VS- Versus, r = correlation coefficient, [r.sup.2] = coefficient
of determination, ** -highly significant at P<0.01, * - significant
at P< 0.05, (ns) - not significant.
COPYRIGHT 2016 American-Eurasian Network for Scientific Information
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Nwite, J.N.; Alu, M.O.; Okolo, C.C.
Publication:Advances in Environmental Biology
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:6NIGR
Date:May 1, 2016
Words:5067
Previous Article:Study of the effects of physiological trait selection on the yield potential in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) under semi-arid conditions.
Next Article:Total antioxidant capacity and malondialdehyde as a markers of oxidative stress in women with diabetic and disorder hormones.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters