Printer Friendly

Principle Research on a Novel Piezoelectric 12-DOF Force/Acceleration Sensor.

1. Introduction

A 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor achieves sensing and measurement of spatial force information, three-dimensional linear acceleration, and three-dimensional angular acceleration relative to an inertia coordinate system. The system is mainly used for measuring robotic force/torques and linear/angular accelerations, loading identification, extraction of contact forces, motion control, and other aspects where it is necessary to simultaneously detect six-DOF force/torque and six-DOF linear/angular acceleration [1, 2]. This corresponds to broad application prospects in humanoid robots, automotive, aerospace, deep-sea exploration, and other fields. Due to a complex structure and calibration difficulties, a few research institutions across the world are committed to investment, research, and development with respect to the sameness.

A multidimensional force/acceleration sensor can be classified into elastic-style and nonelastic-style sensor in the light of the existence or nonexistence of the independent elastic body [3]. An elastic-style multidimensional force/ acceleration sensor always exists two major contradictions caused by the independent elastic body between the complex degree of elastic body structure and strain gage distribution [4] as well as decoupling, high rigidity, and high sensitivity [5]. So far, scholars in this field mainly focus on elastic-style 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor. A strain-type 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor with a double cross beam structure has been presented by JR3 Inc. [6]. It involved an inertia mass, which was mounted on the cross beam and was used as a NASA space manipulator. YanShan University [7] proposed a 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor by using a double-parallel Stewart structure. The inner ring of the Stewart platform was equipped with an inertial mass for measuring 6-DOF acceleration, and the Stewart 6-DOF force sensor, in the outer ring, measured the 6-DOF force. The 6-axis force sensing and 6-axis acceleration sensing parts shared the pedestal. A measurement scheme of a 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor, in which four groups (eight) of two-axis acceleration sensors were installed in the inner ring of a cross beam 6-axis force sensor, has been reported by the Harbin Institute of Technology [8, 9]. This was presented as a solution to the residual vibration, difficulty of identifying the load parameters, and contactimpact problems of a 6-axis force sensor, during spatial movement. Kroger et al. [10] established a minimal custom setup for the 12-DOF force/acceleration by using a JR3 6-DOF force sensor in combination with a set of MEMS. Specifically, three pairs of MEMS were arranged in angles of 120[degrees], on a cylindrical adapter part, and every pair of the MEMS consisted of two single-axis orthogonal MEMS accelerometers.

In order to overcome the above contradictions existed in elastic-style 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor, two types of inelastic-style 12-DOF force/acceleration sensors based on piezoelectric element are presented. Piezoelectric quartz is chosen for two types of inelastic-style sensors' sensing element and conversion element and senses the measured quantities directly. Because of the nonexistence of independent elastic body, these schemes are able to overcome the above contradictions existed in elastic-style 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor. In the first project, installation base of six-axis force sensing unit and six-DOF acceleration sensing unit was shared [11]. Though that can decrease the volume, the vibration generated by 6-axis force sensing unit under alternating forces disturbed the 6-axis acceleration sensing unit, and decoupling cannot be achieved.

To solve the first project's problem, the paper proposes the second research approach in which an acceleration shell is used for combining 6-axis acceleration sensing unit and 6-axis force sensing unit together. There is a short distance between two sensing parts, and the installation base is not shared.

This paper proposes a piezoelectric 12-DOF force/ acceleration sensor based on a study carried out on a piezoelectric 6-axis force sensor [12], and a single mass piezoelectric 6-DOF accelerometer [3, 13]. The structural and numerical models of the sensor were established based on ANSYS. Additionally, the main characteristics, including sensitivity, natural frequency, and static coupling interference, were examined. Finally, the correctness of the theory of piezoelectric 12-DOF force/acceleration was verified.

2. Measuring Principle and Structural Model

The 6-axis force sensing and 6-DOF acceleration sensing parts, in the piezoelectric 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor, are shown in Figures 1(a) and 1(b), respectively. The 6-axis force sensing part consists of (1) force shell, (2) pretension nut, (3) cover, (4) pretension bolt, (5) piezoelectric quartz crystal chip group unit, and (6) pedestal; the 6-DOF acceleration sensing part consists of (7) pretension bolt, (8) inertial mass, (9) piezoelectric quartz crystal chip group unit, (10) pedestal, and (11) acceleration shell. The piezoelectric quartz crystal chip groups, of the 6-axis force sensing part and the 6-axis acceleration sensing part, were sandwiched between pedestal (6) and cover (3), and pedestal (10) and inertial mass (8).

2.1. Working Principle. The distribution of the two piezoelectric quartz crystal chip group units, in a piezoelectric 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor, is identical, as shown in Figure 2. It is assumed that the measured space forces and torques correspond to [f.sub.x], [f.sub.y], [f.sub.z], [m.sub.x], [m.sub.y], and [m.sub.z]; the measured linear acceleration and angular acceleration correspond to [a.sub.x], [a.sub.y], [a.sub.z], [a.sub.x], [a.sub.y], and [a.sub.z]; the response outputs of the 6-axis acceleration sensing and 6-axis force sensing parts correspond to [A.sub.x], [A.sub.y], [A.sub.z], [A.sub.[alpha]x], [A.sub.[alpha]y], [A.sub.[alpha]z], [F.sub.x], [F.sub.y], [F.sub.z], [M.sub.x], [M.sub.y], and [M.sub.z].

In the piezoelectric 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor, two piezoelectric quartz crystal chip group units were uniformly distributed in concentric circles. Quartz crystal chip groups 1, 3, 5, and 7 correspond to [Y0.sup.0] crystals and are responsible for the measurement of three parameters in the directions of [a.sub.x], [[alpha].sub.y], and [[alpha].sub.z]. Additionally, four groups of quartz crystal chip groups of [X0.sup.0] crystals were distributed to the remaining four positions and were responsible for the measurement of three parameters in the directions of [a.sub.z], [[alpha].sub.x], and [[alpha].sub.y]. Similarly, quartz crystal chip groups 1, 3, 5, and 7 correspond to the [Y0.sup.0] crystals in charge of the measurement of three parameters in the directions of [f.sub.x], [f.sub.y], and [m.sub.z]. Furthermore, four groups of quartz crystal chip groups of [X0.sup.0] crystals were distributed to the remaining four positions in charge of the measurement of three parameters in the directions of [f.sub.z], [m.sub.x], and [m.sub.y]. Each set of piezoelectric quartz crystal chip group corresponds to a one-channel output signal. Thus, the 16-channel signal, of a piezoelectric 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor, was preprocessed and converted into a 12-channel signal, and the measured parameters were obtained from the 12-channel signal by performing a decoupling matrix calculation and error correction. Equation (1) denotes the measuring principle of the mapping relationships of a piezoelectric 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor, as follows:

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (1)

In (1), Ft represents the inertial force sensed by the piezoelectric quartz crystal chip groups in the 6-axis acceleration sensing part, and [F.sub.0i] represents the contact force sensed by the piezoelectric quartz crystal chip groups in the 6-axis force sensing part. The subscript numbers represent the serial number of quartz crystal chip groups, and the subscript letters represent the spatial axes of the piezoelectric 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor. The force and the acceleration transfer coefficients K were determined by the level of processing technology, parameters, and forms of sensor structure. They represent the ratio of the actual force, or acceleration, measured by piezoelectric quartz crystal chip groups for external force, or acceleration, when the external force/torque or inertial force/torque is distributed by a pretension nut, cover, and other nonconverting elements.

2.2. Structural Model. The following assumptions were adopted in order to simplify the analysis: the rigidities of the quartz crystal chip groups, as well as the same sensitivity and symmetrical uniform layout, are identical. Both the inertial mass and cover correspond to rigid bodies and possess equal rigidity in all directions. Additionally, they possess identical sensitivity and are distributed uniformly. The distributions of [f.sub.z], [m.sub.x], and [m.sub.y] obey the lever principle of quartz crystal chip groups, and [f.sub.x], [f.sub.y], and [m.sub.z] are distributed equally. Similarly, the distributions of [a.sub.z], [[alpha].sub.x], and [[alpha].sub.y] conform to the lever principle on quartz crystal chip groups, and [a.sub.x], [a.sub.y], and [[alpha].sub.z] are distributed equally.

Figure 3 shows the structure diagram of the piezoelectric 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor. In the figure, Oxyz denotes the installation coordinate system of the 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor; [O.sub.1][x.sub.1][y.sub.1][z.sub.1] denotes the installation coordinate system of the acceleration quartz crystal chip groups, in which the distribution radius corresponds to R, r = R/[square root of (2)], and the distance between the inertial mass centroid and the surface of the quartz crystal chip groups corresponding to b. The coordinate system of the installed quartz crystal chip groups, of the 6-axis force sensing part, corresponds to [O.sub.2][x.sub.2][y.sub.2][z.sub.2], and the coordinate system of the point of the measured force application of the 6-axis force sensing part correspond to [O.sub.3][x.sub.3][y.sub.3][z.sub.3]. The distribution radius of the force quartz crystal chip groups corresponds to R1, such that [R.sub.1] = [square root of (2)] x [r.sub.1]. The distance between the point of force application and the surface of quartz crystal chip groups corresponds to b1.

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (2)

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (3)

The 6-DOF acceleration sensing part was in the form of an equivalent inertial force, in order to measure the acceleration in the piezoelectric 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor. The inertial coupling in the inertial field doubly impacts the response outputs of the 6-axis force sensing part, with respect to force sand acceleration loads. The response output of each quartz crystal chip group, in the sensor for the spatial 6-axis forces and accelerations, is shown in (2), in which m denotes the cover's mass, and [J.sub.x], [J.sub.y], and [J.sub.z] denote the rotary inertia of the cover, with respect to the X-, Y-, and Z-axes, respectively.

In (3), the input-output structure model relationship, of the piezoelectric 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor, was deduced based on (1) and (2). From (3), the following conclusions were drawn: with respect to the 6-axis acceleration sensing part, mutual linear couplings always exist between [a.sub.y] and [[alpha].sub.x], as well as between [a.sub.x] and [[alpha].sub.y], while linear couplings do not exist between [a.sub.z] and [[alpha].sub.z]. This is due to the influence of its own spatial structure and the inertial couplings of the 6-axis force sensing part in the acceleration field. In the 6-axis force sensing part, linear couplings are generated in the directions of [a.sub.x], [[alpha].sub.y], [F.sub.x], and [M.sub.y]. The directions of [a.sub.z] and [F.sub.z] together with the directions of [[alpha].sub.z] and [M.sub.z] are all the same with respect to the directions of [a.sub.y], [[alpha].sub.x], [M.sub.x], and [F.sub.y], although a linear coupling is not present between [f.sub.z] and [m.sub.z]. This type of linear coupling can be eliminated by employing a mathematical method.

3. Numerical Simulation Method

In order to verify the effectiveness of the piezoelectric 12-DOF force and acceleration sensor's sensing principle, an accurate, practical, and efficient numerical analysis method was presented as the preferred means of research. The static and dynamic characteristic simulation methods of the 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor were created based on ANSYS, because this software possesses a powerful analysis capability with respect to the coupling of a piezoelectricity field. Table 1 provides the main structural parameters of the sensor, where F represents the force sensing component and A represents the acceleration sensing component.

3.1. FEM Modeling. Modeling process: based on the actual structure of a 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor, the physical structure model was first established with SolidWorks, PROE, and other CAD software. Subsequently, the physical structure model was imported into ANSYS, through the ANSYS software interface. With respect to the sensor's material property setup, the coupling unit SOLID98 was selected as the element type of the quartz crystal, while the other component material corresponded to stainless steel with the element type corresponding to SOLID186, EX = 2x [10.sup.11] Pa and [mu] = 0.3. A combination of manually controlling the number of equal divisions and free meshing was adopted as the meshing approach, with respect to the previously mentioned components. A load application included installation constraints, which exerted forces and accelerations. Based on the installation condition of the 12-DOF force and acceleration sensor, all the DOF, of the sensormounting pedestal's installation surface, were set to 0. Based on the actual application mode of the sensor, 6-axis forces were applied to the top surface of the cover, and 6-axis accelerations were applied directly to the entire 12-DOF force/ acceleration sensor, in a global fashion. In order to simplify the exertion of preloads in practice, the contact states were specifically set to a perpetually bound state among the bottom surface of the cover, the piezoelectric quartz crystal chip groups of the 6-axis force sensing part, and the installation surface of the force piezoelectric quartz crystal chip groups. Similarly, the contact states were specifically set to a perpetually bound state among the bottom surface of the inertial mass, piezoelectric quartz crystal chip groups of the 6-axis acceleration sensing part, and the installation surface of the acceleration piezoelectric quartz crystal chip groups. Figure 3 shows the ANSYS mesh graph of the piezoelectric 12-DOF force and acceleration sensor.

4. Numerical Simulation Experiment

4.1. Analysis of Static Characteristics. After the static simulation experiment was performed, the input-output curves of force and charge, in the directions of [F.sub.x], [F.sub.y], [F.sub.z], [M.sub.x], [M.sub.y], and [M.sub.z], were derived as shown in Figure 4. Additionally, the input-output curves of acceleration and charge, in the directions of [A.sub.x], [A.sub.y], [A.sub.z], [[alpha].sub.x], [[alpha].sub.y], and [[alpha].sub.z], are shown in Figure 5. Furthermore, 192 sensor output data were received under the influence of a 12-DOF force and acceleration loads. Four 6 x 6 matrices, namely, [C.sub.FF], [C.sub.AA], [C.sub.FA], and [C.sub.AF], are obtained by numerical simulation experiment, as shown in (4), (5), (6), and (7). Equation (4) denotes a voltage sensitivity matrix of a 6-axis force sensing unit under 6-axis forces. Equation (6) denotes a voltage sensitivity matrix of a 6-axis acceleration sensing unit under 6-axis forces. Equation (5) denotes a voltage sensitivity matrix of a 6-axis acceleration sensing unit under 6-axis accelerations. And (7) denotes a voltage sensitivity matrix of a 6-axis force sensing unit under 6-axis accelerations. The calculation of the 12-DOF force and acceleration loads is achieved by using the above four equations.

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (4)

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (5)

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (6)

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (7)

According to Figure 5, (4) and (7), the sensitivity characteristics and the conclusion of the crossing coupling, of the 6-axis force sensing unit, are available as shown in Tables 2 and 3. The 6-axis charge sensitivities, of the 6-axis force sensing unit, correspond to 1.91 pC/N, 1.91 pC/N, 2.20 pC/N, 135.09 pC/(N x m), 135.29 pC/(N x m), and 212.0 pC/(N x m). The crossing coupling and linear coupling only appear between [f.sub.x] and [m.sub.y], as well as between [f.sub.y] and [m.sub.x]. The above conclusions are consistent with the 12-axis static sensitivity characteristic analysis, which was obtained from the structure model of a 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor in the force field.

The sensitivity characteristic and conclusion of the crossing coupling of the 6-axis acceleration sensing unit were obtained on the basis of Figure 6, (5) and (6), as shown in Tables 4 and 5. The 6-axis charge sensitivities of the 6-axis acceleration sensing unit correspond to -0.0807 pC/g, -0.0807 pC/g, -0.0856 pC/g, -0.0031pC/ rad x [s.sup.-2], -0.0031 pC/rad x [s.sup.-2], and -0.0017 pC/rad x [s.sup.-2]. With respect to the acceleration field, the load in the [A.sub.x] direction generated coupling in the directions of [[alpha].sub.y], [F.sub.x], and [M.sub.y]; the load in the [A.sub.y] direction generated coupling in the directions of [[alpha].sub.x], [F.sub.y], and [M.sub.x]; the load in the Az direction generated coupling in the direction of [F.sub.z]; the load in the ax direction generated coupling in the directions of [A.sub.y], [M.sub.x], and [F.sub.y]; the load in the ay direction generated coupling in the directions of [A.sub.x], [M.sub.y], and [F.sub.x]; and the load in the [[alpha].sub.z] direction generated coupling in the direction of [M.sub.z]. This conclusion conformed completely to the analysis of static sensitivity and coupling characteristics, of the 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor, in the structural model.

It is necessary to discuss the results and the manner in which the results can be interpreted in the perspective of previous studies and the working hypotheses. The findings and their implications should be discussed in the broadest context possible. Future research directions may also be highlighted.

4.2. Dynamic Characteristic Simulation Experiment. With respect to the dynamic characteristics of a piezoelectric 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor, this study mainly focuses on the natural frequency. The ANSYS modal and harmonic analysis method are used to estimate the sensor's natural frequency. The first 12 natural frequencies and vibrational modes, of the piezoelectric 12-DOF force and acceleration sensor, are presented in Table 6 and Figure 7.

As shown in Table 6 and Figure 7, the vibration direction, in which the same direction of force and generated acceleration loads is identical in the modal analysis, and the vibration modes and natural frequency of force and acceleration loads could not be effectively identified. Thus, the harmonic analysis method was adopted in order to further analyze the natural frequency of the sensor. Figure 8 represents the amplitude-frequency and phase-frequency characteristic curves of the 6-axis forces/torques. Figure 9 represents the amplitude-frequency and phase-frequency characteristic curves of 6-axis linear and angular accelerations.

The resonance principle and phenomenon of beat vibration caused significant changes to occur, with respect to the amplitude and phase of the 12-DOF force and acceleration sensor, at the point of resonance or beat vibration, under an excitation signal in the harmonic analysis. According to the changes in amplitude and phase, in the amplitude-frequency and phase-frequency characteristic curves of the 6-axis forces and accelerations, the fundamental frequencies of the piezoelectric 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor were obtained in the direction of the 6-axis forces/torques and 6-axis linear/angular accelerations, that is, the sensor's natural frequencies.

With respect to the harmonic analysis of the 6-axis forces/torques, sinusoidal excitation was applied to the 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor, with amplitudes corresponding to 1000 N and 100 N x m, respectively, a frequency band range of 0 kHz to 50 kHz, and 200 steps. The natural frequencies in the direction of the 6-axis forces and torques are shown in Table 7.

Similarly, sinusoidal excitation, with amplitudes corresponding to 490 m/[s.sup.2] and 1000 rad/[s.sup.2] and a frequency band of 0 kHz to 50 kHz and 200 steps, was exerted on the 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor, in the harmonic analysis of the 6-axis linear/angular accelerations. The natural frequencies in the direction of the 6-axis acceleration were obtained as shown in Figure 9 by combining the peak value trends of amplitude-frequency and phase-frequency characteristic curves, in all directions, as shown in Table 8.

5. Decoupling Method

Figure 10 shows the strain nephogram of the piezoelectric 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor under combined loading. The piezoelectric 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor was under a contact force field and an acceleration field, in a practical application. Thus, 6-axis linear/angular accelerations enabled a 6-axis force sensing part in order to generate the response outputs of the inertial forces/torques, and the 6-axis forces/ torques produced couplings in the direction of the 6-axis accelerations. Hence, the response outputs of the 6-axis force sensing unit and 6-axis acceleration sensing unit superpose and form the static crossing couplings.

The decoupling analysis of the piezoelectric 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor under combined loading is summarized in the following six steps: first-time decoupling of acceleration, first-time decoupling of force, second-time decoupling of acceleration, second-time decoupling of force, third-time decoupling of acceleration, and third-time decoupling of force. In the decoupling analysis, the first-time decoupling matrix of acceleration [A.sub.1] and the first-time decoupling matrix of force [F.sub.1] are shown in (8) and (9), respectively, in which the matrices of [V.sub.FF] and [V.sub.AA] correspond to the output potential difference matrix of the 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor in the direction of the 6-axis forces and accelerations, respectively; [G.sub.AA] and [G.sub.FF] correspond to the inverse matrices in (5) and (4), respectively, as follows:

[A.sub.1] = [V.sub.AA] x [G.sub.AA], (8)

[F.sub.1] = [V.sub.FF] x [G.sub.FF]. (9)

After the first two stages, the influenced matrix [A.sub.F-A], of the 6-axis acceleration sensing part by unit force, and the influenced matrix [F.sub.A-F] of the 6-axis force sensing part by unit acceleration were deduced as shown in (10) and (11), respectively, as follows:

[A.sub.F-A] = [C.sub.FA] x [G.sub.AA], (10)

[F.sub.A-F] = [C.sub.AF] x [G.sub.FF]. (11)

Thus, the second-time decoupling matrix of force [F.sub.2] and the second-time decoupling matrix of acceleration [A.sub.2] were derived as shown in (12) and (13), respectively, as follows:

[F.sub.2] = [F.sub.1] - [A.sub.1] x [F.sub.A-F], (12)

[A.sub.2] = [A.sub.1] - [F.sub.1] x [A.sub.F-A]. (13)

According to [A.sub.2], [F.sub.1], [A.sub.1], and [F.sub.2], the third-time decoupling matrix of the 6-axis force [F.sub.3] and the third-time decoupling matrix of the 6-axis acceleration [A.sub.3] were received as shown in (14) and (15), respectively, as follows:

[F.sub.3] = [F.sub.1] - [A.sub.2] x [F.sub.A-F], (14)

[A.sub.3] = [A.sub.1] - [F.sub.2] x [A.sub.F-A]. (15)

After the completion of the third-time decoupling under the composite loads, the decoupling analysis results of the 6-axis force sensing part and the 6-axis acceleration sensing part were obtained by referring to [F.sub.1] and [A.sub.1], respectively, as shown in Tables 9 and 10. The data in the tables indicate that the relative error, of the 12-DOF forces and accelerations, decreased and amounted to less than 1%. Thus, the effect of reducing the crossing coupling of the forces and accelerations, on the inertial field, was evident.

6. Conclusions

In this study, a type of piezoelectric 12-DOF force and acceleration sensor was proposed, without the crossing coupling between the 6-axis force sensing part and the 6-DOF acceleration part, in order to achieve the measurement of all spatial forces and acceleration loads. The structural model of the sensor was established, and the static sensitivity, static crossing couplings, and dynamic natural frequency were analyzed using ANSYS. A decoupling method was investigated. Based on the results, the following conclusions were obtained:

(1) The structure and measurement principle of the piezoelectric 12-DOF force and acceleration sensor were accurate. The spatial 6-axis force/torque and 6-axis linear acceleration/angular acceleration were provided efficiently.

(2) With respect to the inertial field, the spatial structure of the piezoelectric 12-DOF force and acceleration sensor causing the generation of crossing couplings were between [a.sub.y] and [[alpha].sub.x], as well as between [a.sub.x] and [[alpha].sub.y], in the 6-DOF acceleration sensing part. The 6-axis force sensing part and the crossing couplings were generated in the directions of [a.sub.x], [[alpha].sub.y], [F.sub.x], and [M.sub.y]. With respect to all the directions of [a.sub.y], [[alpha].sub.x], [M.sub.x], and [F.sub.y] the directions of [a.sub.z] and [F.sub.z], in conjunction with the directions of [[alpha].sub.z] and [M.sub.z], were identical. However, the sensor's static crossing couplings were different to those of traditional nonlinear coupling and were eliminated by the decoupling method used in this study.

(3) The natural frequency of the 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor, in all directions, exceeded 11 kHz, and this produced a high natural frequency and a wide working frequency band. The sensitivity of the 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor was slightly lower, although the natural frequency was relatively higher to those of other types of multiaxis accelerometers and force sensors.

(4) Based on the decoupling process presented in this study, the final decoupling results indicate that the relative error of the 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor was less than 1%.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2836365

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 51475060) and the Natural Foundation Project of Chongqing China CSTC (no. CSTC2015JCYJBX0071).

References

[1] A. Winkler and J. Suchy, "Dynamic force/torque measurement using a 12 DOF sensor," in 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1870-1875, San Diego, CA, USA, November 2007.

[2] J. G. Garcia, A. Robertsson, J. G. Ortega, and R. Johansson, "Force and acceleration sensor fusion for compliant robot motion control," in Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2709-2714, Barcelona, Spain, April 2005.

[3] J. Liu, M. Li, L. Qin, and J. Liu, "Principle research on a single mass piezoelectric six-degrees-of-freedom accelerometer," Sensors, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 10844-10855, 2013.

[4] W. G. Zhang, "A new distributing and decoupling method of six-degree-of-freedom force sensors," Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 221-222, 1999.

[5] L. P. Chao and C. Y. Yin, "The six-component force sensor for measuring the loading of the feet in locomotion," Materials & Design, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 237-244, 1999.

[6] JR3 Inc., "12 DOF sensors with acceleration compensation," http://jr3.com/products/12dof_overview.html.

[7] F. Gao, Z. L. Jin, X. C. Zhao, and J. L. Li, "12-DOF Force and Acceleration Wrist Sensor of Robot," China Patent 02122567.2, 2002.

[8] F. L. Ni et al., "A 12-DOF Sensor in the End of Robot and its Design Method," China Patent 201510696343.0, 2015.

[9] K. Li, Research on 12--DOF Sensor and Application for the End of Robot Arm, [M.S. thesis], Dept. Mechanic. Eng., Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China, 2016.

[10] T. Kroger, D. Kubus, and F. M. Wahl, "12D force and acceleration sensing: a helpful experience report on sensor characteristics," in 2008. ICRA 2008. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 3455-3462, Pasadena, CA, USA, May 2008.

[11] J. Liu et al., "A piezoelectric 12-DOF Sensor," China Patent 200810070130.7, 2008.

[12] L. Qin, C. Jiang, J. Liu, and Y. Duan, "Design and calibration of a novel piezoelectric six-axis force/torque sensor," in Proceedings Volume 8321, Seventh International Symposium on Precision Engineering Measurements and Instrumentation, pp. 83210G1-83210G9, Lijiang, China, November 2011.

[13] H. Y. Lv, L. Qin, and J. Liu, "Principle research on a single mass six-degree-of-freedom accelerometer with six groups of piezoelectric sensing elements," IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 3301-3310, 2015.

Jun Liu, (1,2) Chuan-Wei Liang, (1,2) Min Li, (1,2) Ke Jian, (1,2) Lan Qin, (1) and Jing-Cheng Liu (1)

(1) Key Laboratory of Optoelectronics Technology and Systems Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China

(2) College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Jun Liu; junliu@cqu.edu.cn

Received 2 July 2017; Accepted 9 October 2017; Published 31 December 2017

Academic Editor: Stefano Stassi

Caption: Figure 1: A schematic diagram of a 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor. (a) 6-axis force sensing part of a piezoelectric 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor; (b) 6-DOF acceleration sensing part of a piezoelectric 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor.

Caption: Figure 2: A layout diagram of piezoelectric quartz crystal chip groups.

Caption: Figure 3: A structural diagram of the piezoelectric 12-DOF force/ acceleration sensor.

Caption: Figure 4: ANSYS mesh graph of the piezoelectric 12-DOF force/ acceleration sensor.

Caption: Figure 5: Input-output curves of force and the charge of the 6-axis force sensing part. (a) [F.sub.x], (b) [F.sub.y], (c) [F.sub.z], (d) [M.sub.x], (e) [M.sub.y], and (f) [M.sub.z].

Caption: Figure 6: Input-output curves of acceleration and charge of the 6-axis acceleration sensing part. (a) [A.sub.x], (b) [A.sub.y], (c) [A.sub.z], (d) [[alpha].sub.x], (e) [[alpha].sub.y], and (f) [[alpha].sub.z].

Caption: Figure 7: Graphs of the first 12 vibrational modes of the piezoelectric 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor. (a) First vibration mode. (b) Second vibration mode. (c) Third vibration mode. (d) Fourth vibration mode. (e) Fifth vibration mode. (f) Sixth vibration mode. (g) Seventh vibration mode. (h) Eighth vibration mode. (i) Ninth vibration mode. (j) Tenth vibration mode. (k) Eleventh vibration mode. (l) Twelfth vibration mode.

Caption: Figure 8: Amplitude-frequency and phase-frequency characteristic curves of 6-axis force/torque. (a) [F.sub.x], (b) [F.sub.y], (c) [F.sub.z], (d) [M.sub.x], (e) [M.sub.y], and (f) [M.sub.z].

Caption: Figure 9: Amplitude-frequency and phase-frequency characteristic curves in the direction of 6-axis linear and angular accelerations. (a) [A.sub.x], (b) [A.sub.y], (c) [A.sub.z]. (d) [[alpha].sub.x], (e) [[alpha].sub.r] and (f) [[alpha].sub.z].

Caption: Figure 10: Strain nephogram of 12-DOF force/acceleration sensor under combined loadings.
Table 1: Main structural parameters of the sensor.

Sensing part              Thickness (mm)   Outer diameter (mm)

F-cover                         7                  59
F-pretension bolt               16                 10
F- mounting boss                3                  57
F-mounting pedestal             4                  80
F-piezoelectric element         2                  15
A-inertial mass                 11                 25
A-boss                          3                  23
A-pedestal                      4                  29
A-piezoelectric element         2                   6

Sensing part               Material     Elasticity modulus (GPa)

F-cover                   1Cr18Ni9Ti              210
F-pretension bolt         1Cr18Ni9Ti              210
F- mounting boss          1Cr18Ni9Ti              210
F-mounting pedestal       1Cr18Ni9Ti              210
F-piezoelectric element   Si[O.sub.2]              80
A-inertial mass           1Cr18Ni9Ti              210
A-boss                    1Cr18Ni9Ti              210
A-pedestal                1Cr18Ni9Ti              210
A-piezoelectric element      SiO2                  80

Sensing part              Density (kg/[m.sup.3])

F-cover                            7900
F-pretension bolt                  7900
F- mounting boss                   7900
F-mounting pedestal                7900
F-piezoelectric element            2650
A-inertial mass                    7900
A-boss                             7900
A-pedestal                         7900
A-piezoelectric element            2650

Table 2: Crossing coupling simulation results of static sensitivity
in 6-axis force directions under an external force.

                            Crossing coupling

Load category   [F.sub.x]   [F.sub.y]   [F.sub.z]   [M.sub.x]

[F.sub.x]           1       -0.0272%     0.0048%     1.5753%
[F.sub.y]        0.0427%        1       -0.0264%    -51.9716%
[F.sub.z]       -0.0233%     0.0293%        1        0.0469%
[M.sub.x]       -0.0213%     0.1134%     0.0314%        1
[M.sub.y]       -0.0918%    -0.0140%    -0.0528%     0.8605%
[M.sub.z]       -0.0014%    -0.0045%    -0.3384%     0.0074%

                   Crossing coupling

Load category   [M.sub.y]   [M.sub.z]

[F.sub.x]       52.0007%     0.0527%
[F.sub.y]        1.2153%    -0.0017%
[F.sub.z]       -0.0790%     0.0983%
[M.sub.x]       -0.6897%     0.0228%
[M.sub.y]           1       -0.0074%
[M.sub.z]        0.0188%        1

Table 3: Crossing coupling simulation results of static sensitivity
in 6-axis acceleration directions under an external force.

                              Crossing coupling

Load category   [A.sub.x]   [A.sub.y]   [A.sub.z]   [[alpha].sub.x]

[F.sub.x]        0.0111%     0.0002%    -0.0001%        0.0009%
[F.sub.y]       -0.0004%     0.0110%    -0.0001%        0.0032%
[F.sub.z]           0       -0.0001%    -0.0013%        0.0001%
[M.sub.x]        0.0002%    -0.0106%        0           -0.0016%
[M.sub.y]        0.0107%        0           0           0.0008%
[M.sub.z]           0           0           0              0

                        Crossing coupling

Load category   [[alpha].sub.y]    [[alpha].sub.z]

[F.sub.x]           -0.0030%              0
[F.sub.y]           0.0006%               0
[F.sub.z]           -0.0001%           -0.0008%
[M.sub.x]           -0.0006%              0
[M.sub.y]           -0.0014%              0
[M.sub.z]              0               -0.0001%

Table 4: Crossing coupling simulation results of static sensitivity
in 6-axis acceleration directions under external acceleration.

                                 Crossing coupling

Load category      [A.sub.x]   [A.sub.y]   [A.sub.z]   [[alpha].sub.x]

[A.sub.x]              1        0.1942%    -0.1485%        0.4624%
[A.sub.y]          -0.1001%        1       -0.0981%       -115.7825%
[A.sub.z]          -0.0060%    -0.0296%        1           0.0494%
[[alpha].sub.x]     0.0459%    -65.8458%    0.0768%           1
[[alpha].sub.y]    65.9159%     0.1047%    -0.1076%        0.3162%
[[alpha].sub.z]     0.0245%    -0.0063%    -0.0775%        0.0329%

                            Crossing coupling

Load category      [[alpha].sub.y]    [[alpha].sub.z]

[A.sub.x]             115.6828%           0.0644%
[A.sub.y]              0.5971%            0.0088%
[A.sub.z]              -0.0172%           0.3814%
[[alpha].sub.x]        -0.4050%           -0.0089%
[[alpha].sub.y]           1               0.0464%
[[alpha].sub.z]        -0.0158%              1

Table 5: Crossing coupling simulation results of static sensitivity
in 6-axis force directions under external acceleration.

                                   Crossing coupling

Load category      [F.sub.x]   [F.sub.y]    [F.sub.z]    [M.sub.x]

[A.sub.x]          357.5465%    -0.6633%     0.5882%      24.1290%
[A.sub.y]           0.4468%    356.0423%     -0.3784%    -29.2919%
[A.sub.z]          -0.7484%     0.6213%     302.2579%     0.1503%
[[alpha].sub.x]    -0.5268%    -462.1897%    0.4869%     165.8323%
[[alpha].sub.y]    464.5818%    -0.9550%     0.5549%      27.3322%
[[alpha].sub.z]    -0.0306%     -0.0394%    -23.1154%     0.1509%

                      Crossing coupling

Load category      [M.sub.y]    [M.sub.z]

[A.sub.x]           29.0320%     0.9147%
[A.sub.y]           23.6266%     0.3112%
[A.sub.z]           -0.0446%     3.6708%
[[alpha].sub.x]    -26.1765%     0.0944%
[[alpha].sub.y]    166.1228%     0.6684%
[[alpha].sub.z]     0.2853%     793.7115%

Table 6: Modal analysis data.

Rank   Natural frequency (Hz)              Vibrational mode

1              12,970             The linear vibration of the shell
                                           along the x-axis

2             12977.4             The linear vibration of the shell
                                           along the y-axis

3             19661.7             The bending vibration of the lower
                                 part of the shell along the bisector
                                    of the positive x- and y-axis

4             19676.7             The bending vibration of the lower
                                 part of the shell along the bisector
                                    of the positive x-axis and the
                                           negative y-axis

5             21005.3             The linear vibration of the shell
                                           along the z-axis

6             21412.2           The rotational vibration of the lower
                                  part of the shell along the z-axis

7             27467.3            The reverse linear vibration of the
                                  upper and lower part of the shell
                                           along the z-axis

8             27709.7             The bending vibration of the shell
                                           along the y-axis

9             27772.3             The bending vibration of the shell
                                           along the x-axis

10            28833.6            The same rotational vibration of the
                                  upper and lower part of the shell
                                           along the z-axis

11            35022.5            The reverse rotational vibration of
                                the upper and lower part of the shell
                                           along the z-axis

12             35,654            The reverse bending vibration of the
                                  upper and lower part of the shell
                                  along the bisector of the positive
                                    x-axis and the negative y-axis

Table 7: Natural frequency of 6-axis forces/torques.

[F.sub.x]   [F.sub.y]   [F.sub.z]   [M.sub.x]   [M.sub.y]   [M.sub.z]

11,250 Hz   11,250 Hz   14,250 Hz   19,750 Hz   19,750 Hz   21,500 Hz

Table 8: Natural frequencies of 6-axis linear/angular accelerations.

[A.sub.x]   [A.sub.y]   [A.sub.z]   [[alpha].sub.x]

13,000 Hz   13,000 Hz   21,000 Hz      13,000 Hz

[[alpha].sub.y]    [[alpha].sub.z]

13,000 Hz             21,500 Hz

Table 9: Third-time decoupling analysis results of the 6-axis
acceleration sensing module under composite loads.

Load category         Input value      Output of first-time decoupling

[A.sub.x]           98 m/[s.sup.2]            88.341 m/[s.sup.2]
[A.sub.y]           98 m/[s.sup.2]           104.347 m/[s.sup.2]
[A.sub.z]           98 m/[s.sup.2]            98.038 m/[s.sup.2]
[[alpha].sub.x]    1000 rad/[s.sup.2]       1093.901 rad/[s.sup.2]
[[alpha].sub.y]    1000 rad/[s.sup.2]       1304.087 rad/[s.sup.2]
[[alpha].sub.z]    1000 rad/[s.sup.2]       1001.562 rad/[s.sup.2]

Load category      Output of third-time decoupling    Relative error

[A.sub.x]                 97.966 m/[s.sup.2]             0.0350%
[A.sub.y]                 97.977 m/[s.sup.2]             0.0232%
[A.sub.z]                 97.994 m/[s.sup.2]             0.0064%
[[alpha].sub.x]         999.337 rad/[s.sup.2]            0.0663%
[[alpha].sub.y]         1001.338 rad/[s.sup.2]           -0.1338%
[[alpha].sub.z]         999.991 rad/[s.sup.2]            0.0009%

Table 10: Third-time decoupling analysis results of the 6-axis force
sensing module under composite loads.

Load                      Output of first-   Output of third-
category    Input value   time decoupling    time decoupling

[F.sub.x]      100 N          77.528 N          100.296 N
[F.sub.y]      100 N          92.630 N          100.096 N
[F.sub.z]      100 N          88.111 N           99.728 N
[M.sub.x]    10 N x m       9.914 N x m        10.006 N x m
[M.sub.y]    10 N x m       10.091 N x m       9.987 N x m
[M.sub.z]    10 N x m       9.936 N x m        10.000 N x m

Load
category    Relative error

[F.sub.x]      0.2962%
[F.sub.y]      0.0964%
[F.sub.z]      -0.2718%
[M.sub.x]      0.0585%
[M.sub.y]      -0.1258%
[M.sub.z]      0.0036%
COPYRIGHT 2018 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Liu, Jun; Liang, Chuan-Wei; Li, Min; Jian, Ke; Qin, Lan; Liu, Jing-Cheng
Publication:Journal of Sensors
Geographic Code:9CHIN
Date:Jan 1, 2018
Words:6445
Previous Article:Measuring Occupants' Behaviour for Buildings' Dynamic Cosimulation.
Next Article:DCT-Based HDR Exposure Fusion Using Multiexposed Image Sensors.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters