Printer Friendly

Primer registro de Chrysoperla asoralis y C. argentina (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) en cultivos horticolas de La Plata asociado a pimiento (Capsicum annuum L.).

First record of Chrysoperla asoralis and C. argentina (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) in horticultural fields of La Plata associated with the sweet pepper (Capsicum Annuum L.)

The green lacewings, considered to be highly efficient predators, are used for the biological control of various pests, such as aphids, coccids, thrips, and lepidopteran larvae (Lingren et al., 1968; Canard et al., 1984; Greeve, 1984; Thompson, 1992; Bento et al., 1997; Urbaneja et al., 1999). In Argentina, the following four spe cies of Chrysoperla Steimann, 1964 have been recorded: C. externa (Hagen, 1861), C. asoralis (Banks, 1915), C. argentina (Gonzalez Olazo & Reguilon, 2002) and C. defreitasi (Brooks, 1994) (Montserrat & de Freitas, 2005). The first species shows a broad distribution in the Neotropical region and in Argentina it is found from the northern most provinces down to the north of Patagonia (Adams & Penny, 1987); the second is likewise present from northern Argentina, to northern Patagonia (Gonzalez Olazo & Heredia, 2007; Gonzalez etal., 2011); C. argentina, however, has thus far been found only in the provinces of Salta, Chaco, La Rioja and Tucuman (Gonzalez Olazo & Reguilon, 2002; Reguilon et al., 2006); while C. defreitasi has been recorded exclusively in the forests of the Yungas ecologic region in eastern Argentina (Gonzalez et al., 2011) and in northern Patagonia (Montserrat & de Freitas, 2005). The species most thoroughly investigated is C. externa, with ecotoxicological studies recently having been reported (Iannacone & Lamas, 2002; Silva et al., 2006; Rimoldi et al., 2008, 2012; Schneider et al., 2009; Moura et al., 2012; Haramboure et al., 2013). The massive rearing and subsequent release in the field of that species has been promoted in several countries during recent years (Vargas, 1988; Daane & yokota, 1997; Carvalho et al., 2002; Pappas et al., 2011).


The horticultural zone of La Plata is one of the most extensive in the Buenos Aires province, occupying 65% of the greenhouse-cultivated area of the province (Censo Hortifloricola, 2005). The sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) is one of the main crops in this region, but is attacked in both the fruit and the plant proper by several pests, such as the green peach aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Barbosa et al., 2008) and the whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Genadius). Both these pests are of economic significance because of their direct effect on the plant itself through the sucking of the phloem and their secondary role as vectors of viral phytopathogens. In the horticultural agroecosystems of La Plata, the presence of C. externa has been detected in both organic and conventional fields, and in association with these two pests (Schneider, unpublished data).

Samplings made in sweet pepper greenhouses in the area of La Plata, Buenos Aires province (34[degress] 90' 65.67" S, 58[degrees] 14' 25.71" W) resulted in the capture of numerous specimens of the genus Chrysoperla. The species determination was done in the Miguel Lillo Foundation through the use of taxonomic keys. The material analyzed corresponded to C. asoralis and C. argentina, thus representing the first record for both species in the Buenos Aires province (Fig. 1) in addition to the association of those species with sweet pepper.


The aim of this report is to provide a formal record of the presence of these two species in that region, gather information on their distribution, and report a new association with the sweet pepper per se. Furthermore, we have also included here the most relevant taxonomic characters of the larvae and adults of these species (Figs. 2-4 and 5-7).


According to Gonzalez Olazo et al. (2011), C. asoralis could be displacing C. externa on the basis of the high number of individuals found in several locations. Although more studies in the field have to be carried out in order to corroborate the hypothesis, an initial sampling done during a two-year period indicated that C. asoralis was more abundant than C. externa. For this reason, ecotoxicological studies are presently being carried out with an emphasis on a comparison of the susceptibility to insecticides between C. externa and C. asoralis (Haramboure et al. unpublished data). The association of C. asoralis with sweet pepper pests would point to that species as being a potential biologic control agent, with the possibility of ultimately being able to include this species in integrated-pest-management programs. These studies could also be useful in acquiring more information on the taxonomy of the Chrysoperla species before their mass rearing for field releases.

Recibido: 29-VIII-2014; aceptado: 16-X-2014


R.A.A. and M.I.S. are members of the Carrera del Investigador Cientifico y Tecnologico of the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas from Argentina (CONICET). M.H. is a fellowship holder of CONICET. The financial support for this research was provided by the National Agency of Promotion of Science and Technology (ANPCyT-FONCYT, PICT 2011-1752). C.R. thanks Entomology Institute of Miguel Lillo Foundation, Tucuman. We are grateful to Jorge Barneche for his assistance to improve the figures. Dr. Donald F. Haggerty, a retired career investigator and native English speaker, edited the final version of the manuscript.


ADAMS, P. & N. PENNY 1987. Neuroptera of the Amazon Basin. Part I. Introduction and Chrysopini. Acta Amazonica 15: 413-479.

BARBOSA, L. R., C. F. CARVALHO, B. SOUZA & A. M. AUAD. 2008. Efficiency of Chrysoperla externa (Hagen, 1861) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) in the Myzus persicae (Sulzer, 1776) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) population reduction in sweet pepper (Capsicum annum L.). Ciencia e Agrotecnologia 32(4): 1113-1119.

BENTO, A., J. LOPES, L. TORRES & P. PASSOS-CARVAHLO. 1997. Biological control of Prays oleae by chrysopids in Tras-os-Montes region (Northeastern Portugal). Acta Horticulture 474: 535-539.

CANARD, M.,T SEMERIA & T. R. NEW (Eds). 1984. Biology of Chrysopidae. Junk Publishers, The Hague.

CARVALHO, G. A., C. F. CARVALHO, B. SOUZA & J. L. R. ULHOA. 2002. Seletividade de inseticidas a Chrysoperla externa (Hagen) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Neotropical Entomology 31: 615-621.

CENSO HORTIFLORICOLA. 2005. Buenos Aires. Ministerio de Asuntos Agrarios, Secretaria de Agricultura y Ganaderia.

DAANE, K. M. & G. Y. YOKOTA. 1997. Release strategies affect survival and distribution of green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) in augmentation programs. Enviromental Entomology 26(2): 455-464.

GONZALEZ, E. V, J. F. HEREDIA, L. CICHON, D. FERNANDEZ & S. GARRIDO. 2011. Crisopidos (Insecta: Neuroptera) asociados a frutales de pepita en el Alto Valle de Rio Negro y Neuquen (region Patagonia Norte Argentina). Horticultura Argentina 30(73): 5-8.

GONZALEZ OLAZO, E. V. & C. REGUILON. 2002. Una nueva especie de Chrysoperla (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) para la Argentina. Revista de la Sociedad Entomologica Argentina 61(1-2): 47-50.

GONZALEZ OLAZO, E. & F. HEREDIA. 2007. Los Chrysopidae (Insecta: Neuroptera) de la ecorregion paranaense argentina. Fac. de Cienc. Naturales U.N.T.Serie Monografica y Didactica 46: 71.

GREEVE, L. 1984. Chrysopid distribution in northern latitudes. In Canard, M., Y. Semeria & T. R. New (eds.), Biology of Chrysopidae, Junk Publishers, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 180-186.

HARAMBOURE, M., N. FRANCESENA, G. R. REBOREDO, G. SMAGGHE, R. A. ALZOGARAY & M. I. SCHNEIDER. 2013. Toxicity of cypermethrin on the Neotropical lacewing Chrysoperla externa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Communications in Applied Biological Sciences, 78(2): 339-344.

IANNACONE, J. & G. LAMAS. 2002. Efecto de dos extractos botanicos y un insecticida convencional sobre el depredador Chrysoperla externa. Manejo Integrado de Plagas y Agroecologia 65: 92-101.

LINGREN, P. D., R. L. RIDGWAY & S. L. JONES. 1968. Consumption by several arthropod predators of eggs and larvae of two Heliothis species that attack cotton. Annals of Entomological Society of America 61: 613-618.

MONSERRAT, D. J. & S. DE FREITAS. 2005. Contribucion al conocimiento de los crisopidos de Coquimbo, Patagonia y Tierra del Fuego (Argentina, Chile) (Insecta, Neuroptera. Chrysopidae). Graellsia 61(2): 163-179.

MOURA, A. P., G. A. CARVALHO & M. BOTTON. 2012. Residual effect of pesticides used in integrated apple production on Chrysoperla externa (Hagen) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) larvae. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 72(2): 217-223.

PAPPAS, M. L., G. D. BROUFAS & D. S KOVEOS. 2011. Chrysopid Predator and their role in Biological Control. Journal of Entomology 8(3): 301-326.

REGUILON, C., E. V GONZALEZ OLAZO & S. R. NUNEZ CAMPERO. 2006. Morfologia de los estados inmaduros de Chrysoperla argentina (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Acta Zoologica Lilloana 50(1-2): 31-39.

RIMOLDI, F., M. I. SCHNEIDER & A. E. RONCO. 2008. Susceptibility of Chrysoperla externa Eggs (Neuroptera: Chrisopidae) to Conventional and Biorational Insecticides. Environmental Entomology 37(5): 1252-1257.

RIMOLDI, F., M. I. SCHNEIDER & A. E. RONCO. 2012. Short and Long-Term Effects of Endosulfan, Cypermethrin, Spinosad, and Methoxyfenozide on Adults of Chrysoperla externa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 105(6): 1982-1987.

SCHNEIDER, M. I., N. SANCHEZ, S. PINEDA, H. CHI & A. RONCO. 2009. Impact of glyphosate on the development, fertility and demography of Chrysoperla externa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): Ecological approach. Chemosphere 76: 1451-1455.

SILVA, R. A., G. A. CARVALHO, C.F. CARVALHO, P. R. REIS, B. SOUZA, A. M. ANDRADE & R. PEREIRA. 2006. Action of pesticides used in coffee crops on the pupae and adults of Chrysoperla externa (Hagen, 1861) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Ciencia Rural, Santa Maria 36(1): 8-14.

THOMPSON, W. T. 1992. A worldwide guide to beneficial animals used for pest control purposes. Thompson Publications, Fresno, CA.

URBANEJA, A., E. LLACER, O. TOMAS, A. GARRIDO & J. JACAS. 1999. Effect of temperature on development and survival of Cirruspilus sp. near lyncus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), parasitoid of Phyllocnistis citrella (Lepidoptera: Gracillaridae). Environmental Entomology 28: 339-344.

VARGAS, S. C. 1988. Estudio sobre tecnicas y equipos para la produccion masiva del depredador Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera : Chrysopidae). Revista Palmas, Norteamerica. Disponible en: <>.

HARAMBOURE, Marina (1), Carmen REGUILON (2), Raul A. ALZOGARAY (3,4) & Marcela Ines SCHNEIDERI, (5)

(1) Laboratorio de Ecotoxicologia: Plaguicidas y Control Biologico. Centro de Estudios Parasitologicos y de Vectores [CEPAVE (CONICET LA PLATA-UNLP)], Bv. 120 s/n e/61 y 62, La Plata CP 1900, Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail:

(2) Instituto de Entomologia, Fundacion Miguel Lillo, Tucuman, Argentina.

(3) Centro de Investigaciones de Plagas e Insecticidas (CIPEIN-UNIDEF/CONICET), Villa Martelli, Bs. As., Argentina.

(4) Instituto de Investigacion e Ingenieria Ambiental (3IA-UNSAM).

(5) Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. Universidad Nacional de la Plata, La Plata, Bs. As., Argentina.
COPYRIGHT 2014 Sociedad Entomologica Argentina
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2014 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Nota Cientifica
Author:Haramboure, Marina; Reguilon, Carmen; Alzogaray, Raul A.; Schneider, Marcela Ines
Publication:Revista de la Sociedad Entomologica Argentina
Date:Jul 1, 2014
Previous Article:Primeros estudios sobre asociaciones troficas de interes para la sanidad forestal en Eucalyptus spp.
Next Article:Aleuas uruguayensis Carbonell (Orthoptera, Acrididae, Copiocerinae): nueva ocurrencia en la provincia biogeografica Paranaense.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters