Printer Friendly

Prevalence of intimate partner violence and associated factors.

INTRODUCTION

According to the results of a survey conducted by the World Health Organization (WHO) using face-to-face interviews on 24,000 women in 10 countries, all types of violence against women were found to be substantially prevalent (physical violence, 13-61%; emotional violence, 20-75%; and sexual violence 6-59%) (1). The prevalence of physical domestic violence was reported to be 39% in a study conducted on more than 12,000 women in Turkey (2). Another national study found that one in three women is subjected to violence from their partners (3). Apart from population-based studies, the studies conducted on patients presenting to health care providers indicate high rates of domestic violence (4,5). Early and arranged marriage, inadequate social support, total economic dependence, living in a large family low educational level, alcohol abuse/addiction by the male partner and exposure to violence during childhood were found to be associated with violence (2,4,5,6).

Apart from the above-mentioned social factors, attachment patterns and childhood traumas were also found to be associated with domestic violence (7,8). The attachment theory defines the function of relationship between a baby and his/her caregiver(s) and how this relationship would predict future psychological development of the baby (9). According to attachment theory there are three types of attachment in adults: secure attachment, anxious-resistant insecure attachment, and anxious-avoidant insecure attachment (9,10). Individuals interiorize their relations with people with whom they develop attachment, and they develop cognitive and internal working models and learn how to regulate their behaviors in a close relationship. Being exposed to or witnessing violence shapes cognitive models and affects relations during adulthood (8,11,12). Individuals with an insecure attachment pattern are more likely to engage in or maintain abusive relationships (7,8).

Another risk factor for intimate partner violence is neglect and abuse experienced during childhood. The findings of studies support a relationship between the history of abuse during childhood and sustaining intimate partner violence during adulthood (8). All types of abuse and trauma experienced during childhood pose a risk for all forms of psychopathology. Studies found that childhood traumas are risk factors for early-onset depression and persistent symptoms (6,11).

The rate of depression is higher in women sustaining violence (6,13,14). The risk of depression in women exposed to domestic violence is 4-5-fold higher compared with women who do not have a history of trauma (14). The prevalence of lifetime intimate partner violence reaches 60% in patients diagnosed with depression (6). It must be taken into consideration that intimate partner violence is an important risk factor for depression, but it can also affect the course of depressive disorder Domestic violence against women is a public health concern with increasing importance. Raising awareness and information levels among mental health care providers will also raise public awareness about domestic violence. There are a limited number of studies conducted on this subject in Turkey The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence of domestic violence against women with depression, which is one of the most common patient groups encountered in daily practice, and to investigate the relationship between domestic violence and attachment patterns, childhood traumas, and socio-demographic variables.

METHODS

The study was conducted on consecutive women who presented to the outpatient psychiatry clinic at izmir Ataturk Training and Research Hospital between November 1,2010 and December 1,2010 and who were diagnosed with depressive disorder. The study inclusion criteria were age between 18 and 60 years, voluntary participation, being literate, and having been diagnosed with major depressive disorder, dysthymic disorder or depressive disorder not defined otherwise during an interview based on Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV axis I disorders (SCID-I). The exclusion criteria included the presence of cognitive impairment that would prevent a participant from understanding study questions, psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder mental retardation, or dementia, and the presence of an organic brain disease (epilepsy stroke, etc.). The control group included patients matched for age, educational level, and socio-economic status with the study group who did not have any psychiatric disorder during SCID-I and who provided consent for participation in this study (15).

Assessments

The women were assessed with a face-to-face interview. Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of the hospital. The study participants provided written informed consent for the study.

Assessment Tools

Semi-structured questionnaire: A 97-item questionnaire prepared for the study was used during the face-to-face interviews to obtain socio-demographic data and features related to violence. Detailed information was obtained about physical violence. Age at the first exposure to physical violence, duration, last exposure to physical violence, frequency of violence, exposure to physical violence during pregnancy, witnessing violence by children, causes of violence, woman's reaction, violence against children by the female or male partner and physical violence experienced or witnessed by the male partner during childhood were questioned. The same questions were asked to the women in the control group.

SCID-I: This was developed by First et al. (15) and adapted to Turkish (16).

The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD): This scale measures the level of depression and the severity of depressive symptoms. The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the scale was evaluated (17,18).

The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A): This scale was developed by Hamilton to evaluate anxiety level, symptom distribution, and changes in the symptom severity, and the Turkish version of the scale was evaluated for its validity and reliability (19,20).

The Adult Attachment Style Questionnaire (AASQ): The first section developed by Hazan and Shaver (10) consists of three different statements including definitions with reference to the quality of the relationship with parents as well as overall behavioral qualities. The second section developed by Mikulincer et al. (21) consists of 15 items. Each item is scored from 1 to 7. Each pattern of attachment is represented with five items. The Turkish version of AASQ used in the present study was validated by Sabuncuoglu and Berkem (22) in 2006.

The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ): This scale was developed by Bernstein et al. (11) to evaluate traumatic experiences sustained before the age of 18. The scale consists of 40 items. Higher scores achieved in this scale are associated with traumatic experiences during childhood. The Turkish version of this scale was validated by Aslan and Alpaslan (23) in 1999.

Statistical Analysis

The Student's t-test and [chi square] test with Yates correction were used in statistical analysis. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A logistic regression analysis was performed to determine variables predicting domestic physical violence. For analysis, the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA) version 13 was used.

RESULTS

The Prevalence of the Diagnoses and Comorbidities in the Patient Group

A total of 130 women were included in the study (100 women diagnosed with depressive disorder according to the diagnostic criteria of DSM-IV-Text Revision and 30 healthy women) (24). The distribution of the diagnoses is presented in Table 1. In the depression group, 24% of the women had a comorbid condition, and anxiety disorders accounted for majority (96%) of the comorbidities (seven had phobia, six had anxiety disorder, not otherwise specified, six had obsessive-compulsive disorder two had panic disorder, two had agoraphobia, two had social phobia, and two had post-traumatic stress disorder).

The Comparison between the Patients with Depressive Disorder and the Control Group

The mean age was 39.1 [+ or -] 10.2 years in the depression group and 41.9 [+ or -] 11.3 years in the control group. Of the study subjects, 67% in the depression group and 66.7% in the control group were primary school graduates. Majority of the women in both groups were unoccupied (81.0% in the depression group and 70.0% in the control group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of socio-demographic features with the exception of marital status. The rates of women living separately and rates of divorce were higher in the depression group than in the control group (Table 2). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of socio-demographic features of the partners.

The prevalence of physical, emotional, economic, and sexual violence was significantly higher in the depression group than in the control group. In addition, the prevalence of children's exposure to physical intimate partner violence and the prevalence of physical violence by the father of the male partner against the mother were significantly higher in the depression group than in the control group (Table 2).

The patients in the depression group achieved significantly lower scores in the secure attachment subscale and significantly higher scores in the avoidant and ambivalent subscales of AASQ than in the control group. Similarly the patients in the depression group achieved higher total scores and higher scores in emotional, physical, and sexual abuse subscales of CTQ (Table 3).

The Comparison between the Patients with Depressive Disorder who Sustained Domestic Violence and the Control Group

The comparison of the causes of violence between the subjects in the two groups who sustained domestic violence revealed that the women in the depression group were mostly exposed to domestic violence due to "sexual issues" (p=.03) and that the rates of "physical violence during pregnancy" (p=.00l) and "economic violence" (p=.00l) were higher in this group.

The Comparison between Depressive Patients who Sustained Physical Intimate Partner Violence and Patients who did not

The diagnosis of double depression (dysthymic disorder and major depressive disorder) was more prevalent among depressive women who were exposed to physical violence, and the diagnosis of "major depressive disorder, single episode" and other depressive disorders were more prevalent among depressive women who were not exposed to physical violence (p<.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of comorbid conditions (p>.05). In the depression group, women who were exposed to physical violence achieved higher total scores in HRDS and HAM-A, higher scores in the depressed mood and somatic subscales of HAM-A and had higher rates of suicidal ideation and suicide attempt and achieved higher scores in the avoidant and ambivalent subscales of AASQ and higher total scores and higher scores in the physical abuse subscale of CTQ (Table 4).

The rate of women with economic independence was higher among depressive women who were exposed to domestic physical violence than in women who were not exposed to domestic violence. The prevalence of emotional, economic, and sexual abuse, physical violence against children by the female or male partner and physical violence experienced or witnessed by male partner during childhood were more prevalent among women who experienced physical intimate partner violence (Table 4).

There was no significant difference between the women in the control group who did or who did not experience physical violence in terms of childhood traumas and attachment styles (p>.05).

The Variables predicting Domestic Violence in Women with Depressive Disorder

The physical violence experienced by the male partner during childhood, physical violence of the partner against his children, physical violence experienced by the woman during childhood, suicide attempts of the woman, total score in HRDS and HAM-A, scores in the avoidant and ambivalent subscales of AASQ, and total score in CTQ were included as variables in the logistic regression analysis to determine the predictors of domestic violence. The physical violence experienced by the male partner (p=.01, OR=7.3) and woman (p=.013, OR=7.8) during childhood predicted physical violence in depressive women.

DISCUSSION

In the present study 64% of the women were found to have experienced physical intimate partner violence. Two studies conducted on psychiatric outpatients in different regions of Turkey exhibiting different cultural features reported prevalence rates of 57% and 62% for domestic violence (4,5). In the study by Scholle et al. (25), the prevalence of physical domestic violence was found to be 55.2% in 303 women who were diagnosed with depression. Another study reported a prevalence rate of domestic violence (emotional and/or physical and/or sexual) of up to 60% in women with depression (6). The exposure to domestic violence is one of the major risk factors for depression (26).

Studies in Turkey and other countries suggest that other forms of violence are also common in addition to physical violence. A study conducted by WHO reported prevalence rates of 6-59% and 20-75% for sexual and emotional violence, respectively (1). Field studies conducted in Turkey reported prevalence rates of 9-15%, 44%, and 36-40% for sexual, emotional, and economic violence, respectively (2,3). In the present study, the prevalence rates for various forms of violence were higher in the depression group than in the healthy controls. Three of four women with depression were found to have experienced emotional violence, and approximately one-half experienced economic and sexual violence. The fact that the present study was conducted on women with a psychiatric disorder may explain the higher prevalence rates for violence than those in field studies. A woman who has experienced physical violence is often found to have been exposed to other forms of violence, and therefore, patients should be questioned for other forms of violence when one form of violence is observed.

There is a relationship between insecure attachment style and major depressive disorder postpartum depression, and many other psychiatric disorders (27). Secure attachment style can act as a protector against adverse life events and render an individual resistant to life stresses (28). In the present study, the scores of the patients in the secure attachment subscale were significantly lower and the scores in the avoidant and ambivalent attachment subscales were higher in the depression group than in the control group. Furthermore, depressive women who were exposed to physical violence achieved higher scores in the avoidant and ambivalent subscales than in women who were not exposed to physical violence. Studies support the role of individual and partner characteristics on marital adjustment and violence between intimate partners (7,8). In the present study attachment styles were not evaluated in the partners of the women. Another risk factor for both intimate partner violence and developing psychopathological conditions during adulthood is the neglect and abuse experienced during childhood (29). Individuals with a history of abuse during childhood are known to be susceptible to be a victim of abuse during adulthood (30). In the present study the prevalence of sexual, physical, and emotional abuse during childhood was higher in the depression group than in the control group. In addition, depressive women who were exposed to physical violence achieved higher total scores and higher scores in the physical abuse subscale of CTQ than in depressive women who were not exposed to physical violence. In the control group, there was no significant difference between the subjects who did or did not experience physical violence in terms of a history of trauma during childhood. It is important to investigate the history of psychological trauma during childhood and attachment styles in depressive women who are exposed to physical violence. In a therapeutic relationship, addressing the attachment style of the patient and past traumas may provide a significant contribution to the treatment process (29).

The prevalence of children's exposure to physical intimate partner violence and the prevalence of physical violence by the father of the male partner against the mother were significantly higher in the depression group than in the control group. The present study found that the male partners of depressive women who experienced physical violence engaged in acts of physical violence against children and have also been a victim of domestic violence during childhood. Another important point is that physical violence experienced by the male partner and the woman during childhood predicted physical domestic violence. The violence being exposed or witnessed by an individual increases the risk of future exposure to or engaging in acts of violence (8,11). Holt (31) made a reference to the social learning theory and emphasized that children are more likely to imitate behavior of being rewarded than that of being punished. Individuals who witnessed domestic violence during childhood and those who grew up in a family environment and who considered domestic violence as if it were an ordinary event would become the perpetrator of violence against their partners during adulthood. This is referred to as intergenerational cycle of violence (32). Lewendosky et al. (33) dealt with the relationship between attachment theory, traumatic experiences during childhood and domestic violence.

In romantic relationships, each partner is the figure of attachment for the other partner The internal attachment models created during childhood are reflected in the romantic relationships during adulthood. Exposure to domestic violence increases the risk of developing psychopathological conditions and unfavorably affects the internal working models of a mother against herself and her children. This harms both the mother and her children and results in intergenerational transmission of violence. Consequently domestic violence is associated with traumatic childhood experiences and attachment styles. Domestic violence can result in insecure attachment and vice versa. This vicious cycle indicates the importance of preventing violence from the standpoint of preventive psychiatry

In depressive women who were exposed to domestic violence, severity of depression and anxiety symptoms were higher, scores in the depressed mood and somatic subscales of HAM-A were higher, suicidal ideation and suicide attempts were more common, and the diagnosis of double depression was more prevalent than in women who were not exposed to domestic violence. As suggested in relevant studies, domestic violence plays a role in chronic state and severity of depression (25). Dienemann et al. (6) found that the severity of abuse correlated with the severity of depression. Field studies conducted in Turkey found 328 that the rate of suicidal ideation was 3-fold higher and that the rate of suicide attempts was 4-fold higher in women who were exposed to physical or sexual violence than in those who were not (2). It is important to investigate the presence of domestic violence in women with severe and chronic depression in whom depressive symptoms are accompanied by somatic symptoms and in women having suicidal ideation/attempted suicide.

Poverty and lack of economic independence are suggested to be factors increasing the risk of being exposed to violence (2,14). In the present study, domestic violence was more prevalent among women who have achieved economic independence. In the study by Altinay and Arat (3), women having a higher income than their male partner were found to have a doubled risk of physical violence. The present study did not evaluate the incomes of women and their male partners, and therefore, it cannot be suggested whether the observed difference was caused by the difference between the incomes of the partners. One plausible explanation is that the economic independence of a woman may disturb the balance of power based on the gender stereotypes in the community and thereby increase the risk of violence.

Field studies conducted in Turkey found that approximately one-half of women do not reveal that they are victims of domestic or sexual violence (2,3). Akyuz et al. (4) highlighted that 98% of the patients presenting to an outpatient psychiatry clinic do not mention their experiences of violence unless asked by the physician or provide only limited information or prefer to keep it confidential. In the present study 25% of the patients who were exposed to physical intimate partner violence in both groups talked about their experiences for the first time in this study and almost all patients (93%) responded that they never faced any question before about their experiences of domestic violence. The attitude of health care professionals ignoring and neglecting the presence of violence is another contributor for the perception as if it were an ordinary life event (34). Factors related to children and social and economic concerns are the most commonly reported reasons for enduring violence in depressive women who are the victims of intimate partner violence. Economic concerns, embarrassment, fears of an increase in abuse, perception of violence as it were an ordinary life event, social gender inequality and justification of violence in relation to biases are among social factors keeping violence under the seal of secrecy Institutional and legal resources are important to help female victims of violence to effectively cope with the challenges they face. However many female victims of violence in Turkey are devoid of individual and institutional support (3).

The relatively small sample size was the main limitation of this cross-sectional study. As a summary, two-thirds of depressive women are being exposed to domestic violence. These women have higher rates of childhood trauma and mostly exhibit insecure attachment style. They have a more severe depression-anxiety level and a higher risk of developing chronic depression and committing suicide. The physical violence experienced by the male partner and the woman during childhood predicts domestic violence during adulthood. Physical violence is often accompanied by emotional, economic, and sexual violence. Treating violence as a common and "ordinary" stressor and leaving the issue unspoken even in a professional relationship will increase the feelings of hopelessness and desperation in women as victims of domestic violence. Psychiatric care personnel should keep in mind the possibility of domestic violence in women diagnosed with depressive disorder The investigation of domestic violence contributes to the treatment of depression, but it is also important for the recognition and prevention of domestic violence transmitted through generations. Long-term observational studies are warranted to gain an insight on how domestic violence affects the development and course of depression.

DOI: 10.5152/npa.2015.7535

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

REFERENCES

(1.) Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen H, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Watts CH; WHO Multi-country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women Study Team. Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence. Lancet 2006; 368:1260-1269. [CrossRef]

(2.) TC. Bagbakanlik Kadinin Statusu Genel Mudurlugu. Turkiye'de kadina yonelik aile igi giddet aragtirmasi. Ozet rapor Ankara; 2009.

(3.) Altinay AG, Arat Y Turkiye'de Kadina Yonelik siddet 2007; Erigim tarihi: 10.07.2012 http://www.kadinayoneliksiddet.org/kitap.html

(4.) Akyuz G, Kugu N, Dogan O, Ozdemir L. Bir psikiyatri poliklinige bagvuran evli kadinlarda aile igi giddet, evlilik sorunlari, bagvuru yakinmasi ve psikiyatrik tani. Yeni Symposium 2002; 40:41-48.

(5.) Vahip I, Doganavgargil O. Domestic violence and female patients. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 2006; 17:107-114.

(6.) Dienemann J, Boyle E, Baker D, Resnick W, Wiederhorn N, Campbell J. Intimate partner abuse about woman diagnosed with depression. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2000; 21:499-513. [CrossRef]

(7.) West M, George C. Abuse and violence in intimate adult relationships: New perspectives from attachment theory. Attach Hum Dev 1999; 1:137-156. [CrossRef]

(8.) Rapoza KA, Baker AT Attachment styles, alcohol, and childhood experiences of abuse: an analysis of physical violence in dating couples. Violence Vict 2008; 23:52-65. [CrossRef]

(9.) Bowlby J. Developmental psychiatry comes of age. Am J Psychiatry 1988; 145:1-10. [CrossRef]

(10.) Hazan C, Shaver P Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987; 52: 511-524. [CrossRef]

(11.) Bernstein DP Fink L, Handelsman L, Foote J, Lovejoy M, Wenzel K, Sapareto E, Ruggiero J. Initial reliability and validity of a new retrospective measure of child abuse and neglect. Am J Psychiatry 1994; 151:1132-1136. [CrossRef]

(12.) McClellan AC, Killeen MR. Attachment theory and violence toward women by male intimate partners. J Nurs Scholarsh 2000; 32:353-360. [CrossRef]

(13.) Yuksel 5, Kayir A. Psikiyatriye bagvuran orselenmig kadinin taninmasi. Dugunen Adam 1986; 1:16-20.

(14.) Campbell JC, Lewandowski LA. Mental and physical health effects of intimate partner violence on women and children. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1997; 20:353-374. [CrossRef]

(15.) First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Clinical Version (SCID-I/CV). American Psychiatric Press 1997; Washington DC.

(16.) Ozkurkgugil A, Aydemir O, Yildiz M, Danaci AE, Koroglu E. DSM-IV Eksen I Bozukluklari igin Yapilandirilmig Klinik Gorugmenin Turkceye Uyarlanmasi ve Guvenirlik Caligmasi. ilag ve Tedavi Dergisi 1999; 12:233-236.

(17.) Williams JB. A structured interview guide for Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988; 45:742-747. [CrossRef]

(18.) Akdemir A, Orsel S, Dag. Hamilton Depresyon Derecelendirme Olgegi (HD-DO)'nin gegerligi, guvenirligi ve klinikte kullanimi. Psikiyatri Psikoloji Psikofarmakoloji (3P) Dergisi 1996; 4:251-259.

(19.) Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol 1959; 32:50-55. [CrossRef]

(20.) Yazici MK, Demir B, Tanriverdi N, Karaagaoglu E, Yolag P Hamilton Anksiyete Degerlendirme Olgegi, degerlendiriciler arasi guvenirlik ve gegerlik galigmasi. Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi 1998; 9:114-117.

(21.) Mikulincer M, Florian V Tolmacz R. Attachment styles and fear of death: A case of affect regulation. J Pers Soc Psychol 1990; 58:273-280. [CrossRef]

(22.) Sabuncuoglu O, Berkem M. Baglanma bigemi ve dogum sonrasi depresyon belirtileri arasindaki iligki: Turkiyeden bulgular Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi 2006; 17:252-258.

(23.) Aslan HS, Alparslan ZN. ^ocukluk Orselenme Yagantilari Olgeginin bir universite ornekleminde gegerlilik, guvenirlik ve faktor yapisi. Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi 1999; 10:275-285.

(24.) Amerikan Psikiyatri Birligi. Mental Bozukluklarin Tanisal ve Sayimsal El Kitabi, Dorduncu Baski (DSM-IV) Koroglu E, Cev. Editoru. Ankara, Hekimler Yayin Birligi, 1995.

(25.) Scholle SH, Rost KM, Golding JM. Physical abuse among depressed women. J Gen Intern Med 1998; 13:607-613. [CrossRef]

(26.) Campbell J, Kub JE, Rose L. Depression in battered women. J Am Med Womens Assoc 1996; 51:106-110.

(27.) Bifulco A, Figueiredo B, Guedeney N, Gorman LL, Hayes S, Muzik M, Glatigny-Dallay E, Valoriani V, Kammerer MH, Henshaw CA; TCS-PND Group. Maternal attachment style and depression associated with childbirth: preliminary results from a European and US cross-cultural study. Br J Psychiatry 2004; 46:31-37. [CrossRef]

(28.) Hamilton CE. Continuity and discontinuity of attachment from infancy through adolescence. Child Dev 2000; 7:690-694. [CrossRef]

(29.) Carlson BE, McNuft LA, Choi DY Childhood and adult abuse among women in primary health care: effects of mental health. J Interpers Violence 2003; 18:924-941. [CrossRef]

(30.) 5ar V. Kotuye kullanim ve ihmalle iligkili sorunlar Psikiyatri Temel Kitabi. C. Guleg, E. Koroglu (ed) Birinci baski, Ankara, Hekimler Yayin Birligi. 1998. p. 823-834.

(31.) Holt JL. Impact of self-esteem, adult attachment, and family on conflict resolution in intimate relationships. The Faculty of the Department of Psychology East Tennessee State University (Master tezi). 2007. Erisim Tarihi: Mart 2011 http://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi/article=3455&context=etd

(32.) Vahip I. Evdeki siddet ve gelisimsel boyutu: farkli bir agdan bakis. Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi 2002; 13:312-319.

(33.) Levendosky AA, Lannert B, Yalch M. The effects of intimate partner violence on women and child survivors: an attachment perspective. Psychodyn Psychiatry 2012; 40:397-433. [CrossRef]

(34.) Gulseren L, Basterzi AD. Kadina yonelik aile igi siddet: klinik uygulamada yaklagm ve sorumluluklar Psikiyatride Guncel 2012; 2:199-209.

Berna KARAKOC [1], Leyla GULSEREN [2], Birmay CAM [3], Seref GULSEREN [2], Nermin TENEKECI [4], Levent METE [2]

[1] Clinic of Psychiatry, Bucak State Hospital, Burdur Turkey

[2] Clinic of Psychiatry, Izmir Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir Turkey

[3] Clinic of Psychiatry, Manisa Mental Health Hospital, Manisa, Turkey

[4] Clinic of Psychiatry, Qanakkale State Hospital, Qanakkale, Turkey

Correspondence Address: Dr Berna Karakog, Bucak Devlet Hastanesi, Psikiyatri Klinigi, Burdur Turkiye E-mail: bernakarakoc@yahoo.com.tr

Received: 05.12.2013

Accepted: 06.07.2014
Table 1. The prevalence of the diagnoses
and comorbidities in the patient group

Depression type              Number

Major depressive disorder,     36
  single episode
Major depressive disorder,     48
  recurrent
Dysthymic disorder + major     10
  depressive disorder
Not otherwise specified        5
  depressive disorder
Dysthymic disorder             1

Comorbidities

Anxiety disorder               23
Somatoform disorder            1

Table 2. Significant variables associated with
socio-demographic variables and violence between
the patient and control groups

Variable                      Patient group   Control group
                                (n = 100)        (n = 30)

                             Number    %     Number     %

Separation/divorce     No      74      74      29     96.7
                       Yes     26      26      l       3.3
Physical violence      No      36      36      22     73.3
  of partner           Yes     64      64      8      26.7
Psychological          No      27      27      20     66.7
  violence of          Yes     73      73      10     33.3
  partner
Economic violence      No      49      49      27     90.0
  of partner           Yes     5l      51      3      l 0.0
Sexual violence        No      52      52      24     80.0
  of partner           Yes     48      48      6      20.0
Partner's physical     No      34     38.2     l8     62.1
  violence against     Yes     55     61.8     ll     37.9
  children
Physical violence      No      25     28.9     l6     66.7
  by the father of     Yes     59     71.1     8      33.3
  the male partner
  against the mother

Variable                  Statistical
                          significance

                       [x.sup.2]    p

Separation/divorce        4.4      .001

Physical violence        13.0      .001
  of partner
Psychological            15.7      .001
  violence of
  partner
Economic violence        16.0      .001
  of partner
Sexual violence           7.5      .001
  of partner
Partner's physical        5.3      .03
  violence against
  children
Physical violence        1 1.3     .001
  by the father of
  the male partner
  against the mother

Table 3. To compare the scores of AASQ and CTQ between
the patient and healthy control groups

                                    Patient group
                                      (n = 100)

                                    Mean    SD

AASQ secure attachment score        23.6   6.8
AASQ avoidant attachment score      20.6   7.9
AASQ ambivalent attachment score    18.0   8.3
CTQ total score                     83.3   33.8
CTQ emotional abuse score           43.9   18.9
CTQ physical abuse score            33.3   15.5
CTQ sexual abuse score              6.0    2.9

                                    Control group
                                      (n = 30)

                                    Mean    SD

AASQ secure attachment score        28.5   5.2
AASQ avoidant attachment score      11.7   4.9
AASQ ambivalent attachment score    11.1   4.5
CTQ total score                     58.8   17.8
CTQ emotional abuse score           31.7   12.9
CTQ physical abuse score            22.2   6.6
CTQ sexual abuse score              5.2    1.0

                                    Statistical
                                    significance

                                     t     p


AASQ secure attachment score        3.7   .001
AASQ avoidant attachment score      7.4   .001
AASQ ambivalent attachment score    5.9   .001
CTQ total score                     4.5   .001
CTQ emotional abuse score           3.4   .001
CTQ physical abuse score            5.4   .001
CTQ sexual abuse score              2.5   .01

SD: standard deviation; AASQ: Adult Attachment Style
Questionnaire; CTQ: Childhood Trauma Questionnaire

Table 4. The comparison between depressive patients who
sustained physical intimate partner violence and patients
who did not

Variable                      Not Sustained   Sustained
                              Physical        Physical
                              Violence        Violence
                              (s = 36)        (s = 64)

                              Number    %     Number    %

Economic independence   No      33     91.7     46     71.9
  of woman              Yes     3      8.3      18     28.1
Physical violence       No      22     61.1     5      7.8
  of partner            Yes     14     38.9     59     92.2
Economic violence       No      27     75.0     22     34.4
  of partner            Yes     9      25.0     42     65.6
Sexual violence         No      27     75.0     25     39.1
  of partner            Yes     9      25.0     39     60.9
Partner's physical      No      20     65.4     14     24.1
  violence against      Yes    1 1     35.5     44     75.9
  children
Physical violence       No      12     44.4     6      12.0
  experienced by the    Yes     15     55.6     44     88.0
  male partner
  during childhood
Physical violence       No      19     52.8     13     20.3
  experienced by the    Yes     17     47.2     51     79.7
  woman during
  childhood
Suicidal ideation       No      24     66.7     21     32.8
                        Yes     12     33.3     43     67.2
Suicide attempt         No      30     83.3     35     54.7
                        Yes     6      16.7     29     45.3

                               Mean     SD     Mean     SD

HRSD total score               10.7    5.8     15.2    7.1
HAM-A total score              8.8     5.8     12.6    5.5
HAM-A psychical                4.3     2.6     5.7     2.2
  subscale score
HAM-A somatic subscale         4.5     3.6     6.8     3.8
  score
AASQ avoidant                  17.7    7.6     22.2    7.8
  attachment score
AASQ ambivalent                14.0    6.7     20.3    8.3
  attachment score
CTQ total score                73.0    27.1    89.1    36.0
CTQ physical abuse score       27.9    13.0    36.3    16.1

Variable                      Statistical
                              significance

                               [chi      p
                              square]

Economic independence   No      5.4     0.02
  of woman              Yes
Physical violence       No     33.2     .001
  of partner            Yes
Economic violence       No     15.2     .001
  of partner            Yes
Sexual violence         No     11.9     .001
  of partner            Yes
Partner's physical      No     13.9     .001
  violence against      Yes
  children
Physical violence       No     10.3     .001
  experienced by the    Yes
  male partner
  during childhood
Physical violence       No     11.2     .002
  experienced by the    Yes
  woman during
  childhood
Suicidal ideation       No     10.7     .001
                        Yes
Suicide attempt         No      8.9     .001
                        Yes

                                 t       p

HRSD total score                3.3     .001
HAM-A total score               3.3     .001
HAM-A psychical                 2.9     .001
  subscale score
HAM-A somatic subscale          3.0     .001
  score
AASQ avoidant                   2.8     .006
  attachment score
AASQ ambivalent                 3.9     .001
  attachment score
CTQ total score                 2.5     .01
CTQ physical abuse score        2.8     .001

SD: standard deviation; HRSD: Hamilton Rating Scale for
Depression; HAM-A: Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale; AASQ:
Adult Attachment Style Questionnaire; CTQ: Childhood
Trauma Questionnaire
COPYRIGHT 2015 Galenos Yayinevi Tic. Ltd.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Karakoc, Berna; Gulseren, Leyla; Cam, Birmay; Gulseren, Seref; Tenekeci, Nermin; Mete, Levent
Publication:Archives of Neuropsychiatry
Article Type:Report
Date:Dec 1, 2015
Words:5470
Previous Article:Thirty years of magnetic stimulation: is it still only for the purpose of research?
Next Article:Neurological complications after renal transplantation: a retrospective clinical study.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |