Prevalence of congenital absence of Palmaris Longus tendon in young Jizani population of Saudi Arabia: A cross sectional study.
Objective: Medical literature observes clear racial/demographic trends in Palmaris longus absence; with the incidence of agenesis ranging from 5 to 25% in numerous populations. The Arabs remain relatively less explored regarding this phenomenon; more so when it comes to native Saudi populace. This study reports congenital Palmaris Longus absence in young Arab adults.
Methodology: A cross-sectional study recorded the incidence of Palmaris Longus agenesis in male and female volunteers (N=400; 200 Male and 200 Female; age range 21-25yrs) of Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia. Schaffer, Pushpkumar and Thompson tests were applied to confirm Palmaris Longus absence.
Results: The incidence of Palmaris Longus absence was 24.5 % (an overall 16.7 % unilateral and 7.75% bilateral absence with Left sided absence being more common in the cohort). Gender wise, right sided agenesis was more common in males and left sided agenesis was more common in females while the prevalence of bilateral absence was analogous between the two sexes. Conclusion: Palmaris Longus tendon is now a morphologically ebbing entity and its absence/ agenesis is frequent in numerous populations. The incidence of Palmaris Longus absence in Saudi population is towards the higher limit of the range observed in other races. Interestingly, it is more akin to 'Caucasian' values rather than 'Asians'. 'Sexual' and 'limb sided' dimorphism is noted in absence trends. The knowledge of population specific incidence of Palmaris Longus absence and dimorphism trends is important for tendon grafts, reconstructive surgery and holds significant implications for anatomists, orthopedicians and biological anthropologists.
KEY WORDS: Agenesis, Palmaris Longus.
The Palmaris longus (PL) tendon is reminiscent of evolution where it used to enhance grip in primeval apes. It is known as musculus palmaris longus in Latin. It is frequently reported to be absent in Man despite dexterous hand function and elaborate hand muscle usage of humans. Although in the primate hand it is known to enhance palmer function and grip strength; its absence or malformation in humans does not seem to cause any maneuvering disability. The slender PL tendon lies superficial to the flexor retinaculum, is nourished by the ulnar artery and innervated by the median nerve as it weakly flexes the wrist. It originates in the medial epicondyle of humerus (at the common flexor tendon) and inserts in the palmar aponeurosis of hand. The PL tendon occupies a narrow space between the flexor carpi radialis and flexor carpi ulnaris muscles, although it may not always be present.
Many methods are described for clinically determining the presence of PL, including Mishra, Pushpakumar, Schaffer and Thompson tests.1
Being a superficial muscle, its absence can be easily demonstrated through these tests. Of late, PL has received a growing interest in plastic surgery for tendon transfers and free-tendon grafts. It has also been used for a wide variety of reconstructive procedures including restoration of lip and chin defects, ptosis correction, glans penis coronaplasty, eyelid defects and restorative management of facial paralysis.2
Studies on PL agenesis indicate a wide variation across racial and demographic boundaries; the range of absence varying from 6 to 25%.3 Owing to significant racial disparities in its occurrence and agenesis patterns, there is a need to investigate the native Saudi population for PL absence, since most available reports represent Caucasians and Blacks and published literature regarding Arabs is inadequate. Our study probes into the incidence of PL absence and its agenesis patterns in the relatively less explored Saudi population of Jazan region. Jazan province comprises an area of 40,000 sq km in the southwestern part of Saudi Arabia along the Red sea coast, with a population of approximately 1.2 million, including some 5,000 villages and cities. Its major city, Gizan is Saudi Arabia's third most important port.
To the best of author's knowledge, no previous reports on PL trends among Saudi's are available in medical literature and representative information offered by our study will promote a better understanding of morphological features and reconstructive procedures in the Saudi population.
This simple random sampling based cross sectional study used Thompson's, Schaeffer's and Pushpakumar's two-finger sign tests1 for clinically determining the absence of PL among 400 young adult volunteers from the university community of Jazan. (200 Male and 200 Female students; age range 21-25 yrs; College of Medicine /Applied Health Sciences / Pharmacy and Dentistry Faculty of Jazan University, Saudi Arabia). We chose these tests because they were easy to maneuver and applicable in a large number of subjects with considerable degree of accuracy. Also, subjects belonging to this age group were physically and mentally competent of following out instructions in an efficient manner. Schaeffer's test was performed on both hands of the subjects in standing position. If PL tendon was either 'visible' or 'palpable'; the muscle was noted as present. In case of absence, Pushpakumar's and Thomson's tests were applied to re-confirm the muscle's non-existence.
Cases with history of injury and surgery in the forearm/hands or paralysis of upper limbs were not included. Those unwilling, with joint stiffness, recent rheumatologic afflictions of wrist and trauma to hand were also excluded. The observation data was collected by one author (TH) and results were tabulated by another (FNH). Basic descriptive statistics using SPSS version 14 was used to analyze data with a confidence interval of 95% and a p value of less than 0.05 to indicate significance.
Ethical approval of the institutional review board was taken prior to conducting the study and voluntary informed consent of participants was obtained.
The overall incidence of PL tendon agenesis was noted as 24.6%. Unilateral absence was a predominant occurrence as compared to bilateral absence (16.7% cases presented with unilateral absence and 7.75% had bilateral absence; p greater than 0.05-
Table-I: Palmaris Longus tendon agenesis "Incidence and absence trends" tabulated into gender segregation. (n=400).
PL tendon###Females n (%)###Males n (%)###Total n (%)
Right side absence###12(6%)###19(9.5%)###31(7.75%)
Left side absence###27(13.5%)###9(4.5%)###36(9%)
not significant). Sexual dimorphism was noted in agenesis trends; although the difference across genders was non-significant (p greater than 0.05). Right sided absence was more common in males while left sided absence was more common in females. The overall 'right' versus 'left' sided absence showed statistically non-significant difference in the population; p greater than 0.05. The detailed results are presented in Table-I.
Till date, many studies have been conducted in numerous parts of the world to elucidate the absence of PL muscle. It is a dispensable muscle with no 'active' function in hand movements which would otherwise lead to any form of functional deficiency if the muscle were absent. Despite its functionally passive role, PL is a popular agent for tendon transfers, free tendon grafts and in reconstructive procedures. On the routine operation table, it serves as a landmark to identify or lead to the palmer fascia or median nerve. It has been noted as a stabilizer of superficial structures in the palm in preparation to thumbs abduction.4
This study explored PL absence in native Jazani population of Saudi Arabia. All the participants of this study belonged to indigenous Arab populace and no foreigners were included to eliminate confounding bias (here, it is imperative to mention that Saudi Arabia comprises a third of its population from amongst foreigners and expatriate workers). Our observations of 24.5% absence were considerably higher than values reported in Pakistani (12%) and Indian (17%) populations (comparable Asian populations).2 Our cluster exhibited an agenesis incidence lying on the upper limit of the commonly reported range (5 to 25%) in various races.3 Sexual dimorphism was observed in our study, a phenomenon that has been reported previously by Troha5 and Ceyhan.6 The difference between unilateral and bilateral absence was not marked, findings which contradicted the reports of Mokaba GO et al.3
The lower incidence observed bilaterally is consistent with previous accounts of Thompson on Caucasians7 and Sebastin on Chinese1 but differed with Ceyhan's6 records on Turkish population. Unilateral absence was observed to be higher in females (19.5%) than males (14%) of our study group; which correlated with findings of Troha5; Ceyhan6 except for the report on Ugandans by Igbigbi and Ssekitoleko.8
A study on 300 Caucasian subjects by Thompson et al found that PL was absent unilaterally in
Table-II: Prevalence of congenital absence of Palmaris Longus tendon in various populations.
North Americans###Troha ###24%
Pennsylvania. USA###Wehbe ###23%
Seattle, USA###Vanderhooft ###12%
Turkish###Ceyhan [6 ]###25%
Yourbas, Nigeria###Mokba ###6.7%
Pakistani###Hussain FN [2,22]###12.95%
Malays###SA Roohi ###11.3%
Arabian Gulf###Sater ###36.8%
Present study###Hussain FN###24.5%
16%, bilaterally in 9% of the study sample for an overall 24% prevalence of absence.7 The incidence of unilateral as well as bilateral absence was more common in males, which contrasted with our results where females exhibited a higher preponderance of unilateral and bilateral absence. In a study conducted by Elizabeth O'Sullivan and Barry S Mitchell on Chinese race, 22 out of 25 hands with anomalous superficial palmer arches presented with no PL tendon.9 This is a significant finding and indicates noteworthy association between these two anatomical features. Some researches point to a concomitant absence of Plantaris tendon in 50% of cases where PL tendon was found missing, which is another interesting morphological correlation.10
Karatay found the agenesis frequency to be 20.5% in Turks.11 Ceyhan and co-researchers stated that "Agenesis is more frequent in Whites than in Yellow and Blacks".6 They also suggested that PL occurrence is a dominant character in humans.
According to Tahir et al, PL absence was recorded as 2.2% in Chinese, 13.2% in Indians, 3.4% in Japanese, 4.8% in American Blacks, 12.7 in Russians, 14.1% in American whites, 15.3% in European whites, 8.6% in Polish, 19.5% in Jewish and 25.4% in French.2 The overall incidence for African blacks as reported by Igbigbi PS is relatively on the lower side (1.02%)8 except for recent reports by Enye L indicating a higher rate of prevalence(12.6%).12 In a study on 500 Indian subjects during 2008, Kapoor et al concluded the prevalence of PL agenesis to be 17.2% (8% bilateral and 9.2% unilateral).13 The prevalence of unilateral agenesis was more common in female subjects (findings similar to our study where 19.5% Saudi females presented with unilateral absence as compared to 14% males); who were still more likely to have bilateral agenesis (results that contrasted with our findings of a preponderance of left sided agenesis in females).
Numerous studies in the past have indicated that PL absence is more common in women and on the left side, although the observed differences were usually not significant.5,8,11,13-21 Our study exhibited similar findings and again, the differences were non-significant.
Thus, a wide variation of PL absence patterns exists among numerous ethnic and racial sub-groups as documented in available literature. A race specific cumulative and comparative representation of congenital absence of PL muscle has been depicted in Table-II. However, due to lack of complete access to all these studies and fundamental differences in study designs and involved variables, a conclusive inference cannot be rendered until all these studies are meta-analyzed scientifically.
Our report of an incidence of 24.5% absence among native Jizani Arabs is higher than the agenesis frequency documented in most standard anatomy text books (McMinn:15%). Interestingly, it is more akin to Caucasian rates;5 while it exceeds the values generally observed among Asians: Pakistani's,2,22 Indians,13 Chinese,1 Japanese17, Malays18; therefore denying the popular assumption that "Caucasians have a considerably higher prevalence of agenesis than Asians". Also, it matches the findings of Sater et al20 in 2010 on 1043 Bahraini subjects, (Arabian Gulf region) who reported similar high rates of PL absence (36.8%) in their population. This brings forth the possibility that the customary prevalence of PL absence in Asian populations may not be applied to Arab populations.
Ceyhan et al argue that the PL muscle appears to be 'increasing' in their native Gazientep population, while it is generally seen as a diminishing muscle among Turks.6 This elucidates an interesting possibility of PL absence frequency being a dynamic equation in races and contingent upon changing variables with time. This prospect further underlines the relevance of updated demographic records on PL incidence in different populations.
Despite being reasonably objective, our study had certain drawbacks as well; its sample size was moderate and the study area confined to a single demographic region in the western province of Saudi Arabia. A large scale multi-centric study based on cluster sampling of native Arab population might elucidate a more realistic picture regarding this phenomenon. Also, further researches focusing on possible existence of 'PL disparities' among different tribal / ethnic subgroups of the region would be a worthwhile direction to explore.
The prevalence of PL absence among Arabs resembles the demographic trends observed in other races, although lying on the upper limit of the reported range and being more analogous to Caucasian values rather than Asians. This contradiction is interesting, but seems logical because PL incidence exhibits a well documented racial dependence. Comparable with certain earlier studies, unilateral absence is a more common occurrence than bilateral absence and sexual dimorphism with a female preponderance is noted among Saudi's. The knowledge of population specific incidence of PL absence, its prevalent gender trends and current morphologic status is important for tendon grafts and reconstructive surgery as well as for anatomists, orthopedicians and biological anthropologists.
K Abdelaziz and Moaz Mohamed who helped in data collection for the study.
List of abbreviations:
PL-Palmaris Longus; M-Male; F-Female
Competing interests: 'The authors declare that they have no competing interests'.
1. Sebastin SJ, Puhaindran ME, Lim AY, Lim I, Bee WH. The prevalence of absence of the palmaris longus a study in a Chinese population and a Review of the Literature. J Hand Surg. (Br) 2005;30:525-527.
2. Tahir M, Khawar AB, Nabeel A, Rehana S, Faisal NH. Prevalence of Congenital Absence of Palmaris Longus Tendon in Healthy Volunteers-A Cross Sectional Study. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2011;5(1):144-147.
3. Mbaka GO, Akinlolu AA, Ayanuga AO, Shallie PD. The Incidence of Agenesis of Palmaris Longus among the Yoruba Tribe in Nigeria. Nigerian J Med Rehabilitation.2008;13(1):11-14.
4. Fahrer M, Tubiana R. Anteductor of the thumb. Hand. 1976;8:287-289.
5. Troha F, Baibak GJ, Kelleher JC. Frequency of the palmaris longus tendon in North American Caucasians. Ann Plast Surg. 1990;25:477-478.
6. Ceyhan 0, Mavt A. Distribution of agenesis of palmaris longus muscle in 12 to 15 years old age groups. Indian J Med Sci. 199;51:156-160.
7. Thompson NW, Mockford BJ, Cran GW. Absence of the palmaris longus muscle: a population study. Ulster Med J. 2001;70:22-24.
8. Igbigbi PS, Ssekitoleko HA. Incidence of agenesis of the palmaris longus muscle in Ugandans. West African J Anat. 1998;6:21-23.
9. Elizabeth O'Sullivan, Barry S Mitchell. Association of the absence of palmaris longus tendon with an anomalous superficial palmer arch in the human hand. J Anat. 2002;201(5):405-408.
10. Vanderhooft E. The frequency of and relationship between the palmaris longus and plantaris tendons. Am J Orthop. 1996;25(1):38-44.
11. Karatay S. Musculus Palmaris Longus ve Turklerdeki Durumu. Hacettepe Tip. Cerrahi Bulteni. 1970;3:1.
12. Enye A, Saalu C, Osinubi A. The prevalence of agenesis of Palmaris longus muscle amongst students in two Lagos-Based Medical schools. Int J Morphol. 2010;28(3):849-854.
13. Kapoor SK, Tiwari A, Kumar A, Bhatia R, Tantuway Y, Kapoor S. Clinical relevance of palmaris longus agenesis: common anatomical aberration. Anat Sci Int. 2008;83:45-48.
14. Wehbe MA. Tendon graft donor sites. J Hand Surg. (Am) 1992;l7:1130-1132.
15. Gruber W. Beobachten aus der Menschlcher Und Yergleichendan Anatomie Berlin. Memories de I 'Academic Imperiale de St. Petersburg. 1872;11:1-26.
16. George R. Co-incidence of the palmaris longus and plantaris muscles. Anat Rec. 1953;116:521-523.
17. Adachi B. Beitrage zur anatomie der Japaner. Die statistic der muskel varietaben zweite mitteiloung. Zeitsch Folia Morphologie Der Anthropologie. 1909;12:261-312.
18. Roohi SA, Choon-Sian L, Shalimar A, Tan GH, Naicker AS. A Study on the Absence of Palmaris Longus in a Multiracial Population. Malaysian Orthop J. 2007;1(1):26-28.
19. Machado AB, DiDio LJ. Frequency of the musculus palmaris longus studied in vivo in some Amazon Indians. Am J Phys Anthrop. 1967;27:11-20.
20. Sater MS, Dharap AS, Abu-Hijleh MF. The prevalence of absence of the palmaris longus muscle in the Bahraini population. Clin Anat. 2010;23(8):956-961.
21. Agarwal P. Absence of Palmaris Longus tendon in Indian Population. Indian J Orthop. 2010;44(2):212-215.
22. Hussain FN, Hasan T, Tahir M. The incidence of absence of Palmaris longus in young adults of a southern province of Saudi Arabia in comparison with Pakistani population. In Proceedings of First pediatric orthopedic conference (Pakistan orthopedic association): 16-17 March 2012; Lahore, Pakistan.
FNH was involved in conceiving the study, tabulating the data, drafting the manuscript and gave final approval of the version to be published. TH was involved in collecting the data, revising the manuscript and gave final approval of the version to be published.
1. Faisal Nazeer Hussain, MBBS, FCPS Orth, Consultant, Department of Orthopedics, Jazan General Hospital, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
2. Tabinda Hasan, MBBS, MD, Lecturer, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia. Correspondence: Tabinda Hasan, Lecturer, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia., E-mail: email@example.com, * Received for Publication: July 22, 2012, * Accepted: * September 22, 2012
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Hussain, Faisal Nazeer; Hasan, Tabinda|
|Publication:||Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences|
|Date:||Dec 31, 2012|
|Previous Article:||Etiological diagnoses of vertebrobasilar insufficiency with dizziness in 773 patients over a 10-year period in Suzhou, China.|
|Next Article:||Comparison of ranson criteria with paraoxonase, oxidative stress index and CRP in patients with acute pancreatitis.|