Prevalence and correlates of penile HPV infection in a clinic-based sample of Hispanic males.
Methods: After providing informed consent, the participants, underwent a detailed behavioral interview and a clinical examination. Frequency distributions and descriptive statistics were used to characterize the study samples. Prevalence estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for any type of HPV, HR types, LR types, or multiple types. Logistic regression analyses was performed to determine factors associated with each of the HPV types.
Results: Two hundred and six participants were enrolled in this study. The mean age of the participants was 37.8 [+ or -] 13.1 years. Close to 80% of the sample were infected with at least one HPV type; 73.5% were infected with one or more LR-HPV types; 32.4%, with one or more HRHPV types; and 46.0%, with multiple HPV types. The most prevalent HR types were HPV- 35, -31, and -16; the most prevalent LR types were HPV 6/11, and -84. After adjusting for age, having a high number of lifetime female sexual partners was highly associated with having multiple types of HPV infection (estimated OR = 2.86; 95% CI = 1.41, 5.80).
Conclusion: HPV infection is common among sexually active males frequenting this STI clinic. HPV types not covered by the current quadrivalent HPV vaccine were identified. Multiple HPV types in the penis are significantly related to the lifetime number of female sexual partners. The high prevalence of HPV at this particular STI clinic evidences that males need to be targeted in primary care settings if the available vaccine is to be effectively promoted. In addition, opportunities for secondary prevention of HPV in STI settings are recommended, because of the burden of anal and penile cancer documented in the island.
Key words: Human Papillomavirus (HPV), Men, STD Clinics, Hispanics, Puerto Rico
Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio es describir la prevalencia, distribucion genotipica del virus del Papiloma Humano (VPH) en el area genital y los factores de riesgo que estan asociados con cualquier tipo, tipos de alto riesgo (AR), bajo riesgo (BR), y multiples infecciones de VPH, en los hombres que asisten a una clinica de Infeccion de Transmision Sexual (ITS). Metodos: Despues de proveer consentimiento para participar en el estudio, los participantes llevaron a cabo una entrevista y un examen clinico, que incluyo la toma de muestras del area del pene. Distribuciones de frecuencia y estadisticas descriptivas fueron utilizadas para caracterizar la muestra del estudio. Se estimo la prevalencia e intervalos de confianza (IC) al 95% para cualquier tipo de VPH, AR, BR, y para multiples tipos. Se realizaron analisis de regresion logistica para determinar los factores asociados con los tipos de VPH. Resultados: Doscientos seis participantes fueron reclutados en el estudio. El promedio de edad fue 37.8 [+ or -] 13.1 anos. Cerca de un 80% de los hombres (79.5%) estaba infectado con algun tipo de VPH, el 73.5% estaba infectado con tipos de VPH BR, 32.4% con VPH AR y 46.0% con multiples tipos de VPH. Los tipos mas prevalentes de ARfueron VPH-35, -31 y -16, mientras que los tipos de BR mas prevalentes fueron HPV-6/-11 y -84. Luego de ajustar por edad, el tener un mayor numero de parejas sexuales femeninas se asocio significativamente con la infeccion de multiples tipos de VPH (estimador del OR=2.86; IC 95%=1.41, 5.80). Conclusion: La infeccion de VPH es comun entre los hombres sexualmente activos que asisten a la clinica de ITS. Se identificaron tipos de VPH no incluidos en la vacuna actual. La deteccion de multiples tipos de VPH en este estudio se relaciona significativamente con el numero de parejas sexuales femeninas. Dado a la alta prevalencia de VPH en la clinica de ITS, futuros esfuerzos para la promocion de la vacuna deben dirigirse a los hombres jovenes que asisten a los centros de atencion primaria. Por otro lado, se recomienda incluir oportunidades para la prevencion secundaria de VPH en las clinicas de ITS dado a la carga que posee en el cancer de pene y ano documentado en la isla.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is one of the most common sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and is generally asymptomatic (1). More than 100 genotypes have been identified, at least 15 of which are oncogenic, or high risk (2,3). Because most HPV infections are asymptomatic or subclinical, (4) and sexually active males in particular are not routinely screened for HPV, members of this group may act as reservoirs of HPV infections and may transmit HPV to their sexual partners (5).
The prevalence of HPV infection in males varies widely, ranging from 1.3% to 77.6%, worldwide (4). Although differences in sampling techniques account for much of this variability, higher penile HPV prevalence (any HPV types) has generally been observed in STI clinic populations, including 13.0% in Stockholm (Sweden) (6), 13.8% in Hangzhou (China) (7), 28.2% in Arizona (US) (8), 30.5% in Uppsala (Sweden) (9), 45% in Copenhagen (Denmark) (10), 72.9% in Dordrecht (the Netherlands) (11), and 77.6% in Johannesburg (South Africa) (12). Although a high burden of HPV infection has been documented, there are only a small number of studies in STI-clinic settings that describe the epidemiology by HPV type (8,11). Understanding the prevalence and distribution of HPV types in this high-risk population is important to resource decision-making as well as to prevention and treatment planning. This is particularly true in relation to HPV education and vaccination decision-making.
Since 2006, when vaccines against HPV were first licensed in the United States (US), a large proportion of HPV-related diseases, including most cases of genital warts and many types of anal cancer, (13,14) have become preventable. Thus, the reduction of HP V through prophylactic vaccination may reduce a substantive level of disease burden, particularly among key groups, such as men who have sex with men (MSM), HIV-positive men and men who go to STI clinics (15).
In October 2011, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended the routine use of a quadrivalent HPV vaccine in men up to 21 years of age (up to 26 years if they are immunosuppressed) (16). However, uptake among individuals within the recommended age range has been low in the US (17). Also, a communication from the Vaccination Program of the PR Department of Health indicates that rates of HPV vaccination are low in the island as well. Despite the likelihood that HPV vaccination is most effective when administered before an individual's sexual debut, routine vaccination in STI clinics and other settings where high-risk populations are seen may also contribute to disease prevention among this group (15,18). The current HPV vaccine that is available for males is only effective at preventing initial infections with the HPV types included in the vaccine (HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18). Therefore, understanding the prevalence of these and other types of HPV, as well as the risk factors for prevalent HPV infections, is important for this population. For these reasons, and given the lack of data for PR, we studied the prevalence and behavioral risk factors of penile HPV infection (of any type, high-risk [HR] types, low risk [LR] types, and of multiple types) in sexually active males who were 16 years old or over who went to a specific STI clinic in San Juan, PR.
Materials and Methods
This was a sub-study conducted from 2009 to 2011 as part of an ongoing epidemiological investigation of patients attending a public STI/HIV screening and treatment center in San Juan, PR. The UPR-Medical Sciences Campus Institutional Review Board (IRB) previously approved this study. The design and methods of the parent epidemiological study have been described elsewhere (19). Briefly, male and female patients aged 16 years old or older were selected from the clinic waiting room and screened for eligibility (including age and capacity for consent). Participants provided written informed consent for the study procedures and the extraction of selected clinical data from their medical charts (including current STI and HIV status).
Genital specimen collection
For the sub-study, genital samples were collected from the male participants, as has been previously described in the literature (19). A sterilized strip of emery paper (2 by 4 cm; 600A-grit Wetordry Tri-M-ite; 3M) was used with steady pressure to repeatedly abrade the entire surface of the penis. Next, a sterile Dacron swab moistened with sterile saline was used to swab the entire area. Both the emery paper and swab tip were then immersed in Sample Transport Medium (STM, QIAGEN Inc., Valencia, CA). After collection, specimens were frozen at the clinical facilities of the Puerto Rico Clinical and Translational Research Consortium (PRCTRC), where they were then stored at -70[degrees]C and shipped on dry ice to the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), for HPV typing.
DNA extraction/HPV detection and typing
DNA was prepared from each STM sample and frozen until the specimens were batched for analysis. DNA preparation took place after the samples were thawed, they were heated at 56[degrees]C for 1 hour. After cooling, 25 [micro]l of 10 mg/ml proteinase K (PK; Invitrogen, 250 [micro]g/ml final concentration) was added. The samples were vortexed and digested overnight at 50[degrees]C in a waterbath and heated at 95[degrees]C for 10 minutes to inactivate the PK. After DNA purification, PCR was performed using a modified pool of MY09/MY11 consensus HPV L1 primers as well as primers for the amplification of the human beta-globin gene. Five microliters of sample was used for PCR amplification, using a 40-cycle protocol. After PCR, 6 [micro]L of amplification mixture was applied to a nylon membrane and probed with a biotin-labeled HPV consensus probe mixture containing HPV 11,16,18, and 51 L1 DNA. A separate membrane was probed with a biotin-labeled probe for the human beta-globin gene. Each specimen was also studied for the presence of specific HPV types by preparing membranes (as described above) with 6 [micro]L of specimen. The biological specimen was considered HPV positive (any HPV) when it tested positive with the consensus probes or with 1 or more probes for specific HPV types. Specimens negative for beta-globin gene amplification were excluded from the analysis. Negative controls for each experiment consisted of the amplification of the solution containing all of the above components except for sample DNA. Positive controls included the amplification of cloned HPV DNA. The specific HPV genotypes sought included HR-HPV types (16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 53, 56, 58, 66, 68, 70, 73, and 82), LR types (6/11, 32/42, 54, 61, 62, 71, 81, 83, 84+, and 86/87) and types that are of unknown risk (30, 34+, 57/2/27, 90/106, and 102/108, as well as 2 separate mixtures: mixl, containing 7/13/40/43/44/55/74/91, and mix2, containing 3/10/28/29/77/78/94) (20).
Variables of interest
After providing their informed consents, eligible males participated in a behavioral interview that collected demographic factors (age, education, income, employment, marital status, and type of health insurance, if any); lifestyle factors such as alcohol and substance use in the last 90 days, information about sexual partnering (e.g., MSM vs. non-MSM), the individuals age of sexual initiation and lifetime number of sexual partners (female and male), and current sexual practices; and clinical factors such as circumcision status, history of health-service utilization, and self-reported STIs (HIV, syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia, genital warts, and herpes). HR HPV type was defined if the study participant was positive for one or more HR genotypes, whether or not it was also positive for one or more LR HPV genotypes. On the other hand, LR HPV type was defined if it was positive only for LR HPV genotypes. Finally, a combination of more than two HR or LR types was defined as having multiple types. Information on recent condom use was derived from a set of questions about practices at the last sexual event. If no condom was used in the participant's last sexual encounter and/or the participant ejaculated inside the vagina without a condom, that sexual event was coded as "no condom use." Alternately, if the participant reported condom use during his last sexual intercourse and/or he ejaculated with the condom inside the vagina, the event was coded as affirmative for "condom use."
Frequency distributions and descriptive statistics were used to characterize the study samples. Prevalence estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for any HPV risk types, HR, LR types, and for multiple risk types were calculated. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the prevalence of different genotypes in this sample. A p-value for trend was used to evaluate trends in HPV prevalence by age group as well as by lifetime number of female sexual partners. Chi-square analysis or Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate differences in categorical outcome measures. Factors significantly associated with HPV (p-value<0.05) in the bivariate analysis were included in independent simple and age-adjusted multivariate logistic regression models to identify risk factors associated with penile HPV infection (any HPV, HR, LR, and multiple HPV types). First-order interactions between the significant factors of the age-adjusted model were also evaluated in the logistic regression analysis.
Statistical analyses were performed using the statistical package SPSS (Version 17.0, Chicago, IL), while 95% confidence intervals (CI) for prevalence estimations were performed using the binomial CI calculator from Stata Statistical Software (Release 11, College Station, TX).
The demographic characteristics of the total sample (n = 206) are shown in Table 1. The mean age was 37.8 years (SD = 13.1). Less than a third (28%) were visiting the ST1 clinic for the first time at the time of the interview. The principal reason given by the study participants for going to the clinic was to undergo screening for an STI other than HIV (61.3%); roughly a third had gone to the clinic for an HIV test (32.7%) (data not shown). More than half of the participants (53.8%) had a high school or lower education, and 61.3% were employed at the time of the interview. Approximately 20% of the sample reported having no medical insurance. The prevalence of recent (last 90 days) tobacco and alcohol consumption was high, with more than half of the participants admitting to such use (55% and 62% for tobacco and alcohol, respectively). More than a third (36.7%) of the participants reported having used drugs in the 90 days prior to the survey. Of these, the most commonly used drugs were marijuana (21.6%) and cocaine (7.0%). A third of the participants self-reported being circumcised (33.7%) (data not shown).
Sexual behaviors and other factors affecting HPV prevalence
Thirty percent of the participants had had more than 15 female sexual partners in their lifetimes, and 21.1% reported condom use at the last sexual event. Regarding sexual identity, 29.8% self-identified as MSM.
The prevalence of HIV in this sample was 42.2% (95% CI: 35.3%-49.4%), and the self-reported lifetime prevalence of anogenital warts was 22.6% (95% CI: 17.0%-29.1%). Other self-reported STIs in this study were syphilis (16.1%; 95% CI: 11.396-21.9%), followed by gonorrhea (15.6%; 95% CI: 10.8%-21.4%), herpes (14.6%; 95% CI: 10.0%-20.3%), and chlamydia (10.6%; 95% CI: 6.7%-15.7%).
Penile HPV prevalence
Samples were obtained from 205 participants, and beta-globin was detected in 204 (99.5%) of the specimens. Table 2 shows the prevalence of penile HPV infection among the participants with suitable samples (n = 204). Overall, 79.5% (95% CI: 73.3-84.8) of the study participants tested positive for any type of HPV. The prevalence of HR penile HPV was 32.4% (95% CI: 24.1-41.7). The most prevalent HR subtypes were 35 (27.9%), 31 (16.3%), and 16 (13.9%). LR HPV types were found in 73.5% (95% CI: 64.5-81.2) of the participants, and multiple types were found in 46.0% (95% CI: 0.37-0.56) of the sample. The most prevalent LR subtypes were 6/11 (33.3%), 84 (24.2%), and 61 (6.7%). Of the HPV-infected individuals, 42.4% were positive for 6/11, 16, and 18 HPV types combined (Table 2).
Any HPV type infection
Regarding the correlates of any HPV infection, the prevalence of any HPV type decreased as age increased. However, this trend was only marginally significant (p-value for trend = 0.07) (Table 3). The prevalence of any type of HPV infection was significantly lower (estimated OR = 0.44 [95% CI: 0.20-0.93]) for 45 to 54-year-old men than it was for 18- to 24-year-old men (data not shown). Participants who, at the time of the interview, reported being separated or divorced had a 56.0% lower odds of having an type HPV infection than did those who reported being single (estimated OR = 0.44 [95% CI: 0.19-1.02]) (Table 3). In simple logistic regression models, participants who had consumed alcohol in the last 90 days were twice as likely to be positive for any HPV type infection [estimated OR=2.05; (95%CI: 1.02-4.14)] than were those who had not consumed alcohol in the last 90 days (Table 3). However, after adjusting for age, neither of the predictors (marital status separated/divorced [estimated age-adjusted OR = 0.54 (95% CI: 0.22-1.34]) and alcohol consumption in last 90 days [estimated age-adjusted OR = 1.75 [95% CI: 0.85-3.63]) achieved statistical significance. No significant first-order interactions were observed between the predictors (marital status, alcohol consumption in the last 90 days) and age (p-value>0.10).
HR HPV infection
The prevalence of HR HPV infection was 22% higher among individuals who reported having used a condom in their last sexual encounter (estimated OR = 1.22 [95% CI: 0.41-3.66]) than it was among the participants who reported no such use; however, the prevalence did not achieve statistical significance in simple logistic regression analysis (Table 3). In age-adjusted models, an association was observed between employment and HR-HPV, in which those who reported being employed at the time of the interview were 56% less likely to have an HR HPV infection than were those who were unemployed (estimated age-adjusted OR = 0.44 [95% CI: 0.20-0.97]). No significant first-order interactions between employment and age were observed (p-value>0.10).
Multiple HPV infection
The prevalence of multiple HPV infection was higher among those men who reported having had 15 or more female sexual partners (estimated OR = 2.71 [95% CI: 1.35-5.44]) (Table 3) than it was among those not reporting same. This association remained significant after adjusting for age (adjusted OR = 2.86 [95% CI: 1.41-5.80]). No significant first-order interactions between lifetime number of female sexual partners and age were observed (p-value>0.10).
LR HPV infection
No factors were significantly associated with LR HPV types in this sample (all p-value >0.10).
To our knowledge, this is the first epidemiological study that reports the distribution and correlates of penile HPV infection in Puerto Rican males. As expected, given that the setting of this study was in an STI clinic, any types of HPV infection were common (79.5%), which is very similar to what was reported by an STI clinic in South Africa (78%) (12), but which is higher than what was reported by studies performed at STI clinics in Greenland, Denmark (10), the US (8), Sweden (9), and the Netherlands (11). Similar prevalence estimates of any penile HPV infection might have been found because of the high prevalence of HIV infection both in the members of our study (42.2%) and in those of the South African study (49.5%).
In our study sample, HPV types not currently in the quadrivalent HPV vaccine were identified. HR HPV type 35 was the most prevalent followed by HPV type 31 and 16. Despite the high prevalence of any HPV infection in this sample, 42.4% of the infected participants were positive for either HPV 6/11, 16, or 18, which are the types that are targeted by the quadrivalent HPV vaccine.
Given that our study was composed of a population in which high-risk sexual practices are prevalent, the capacity of the study to detect significant associations between well-known risk factors might have been affected. For example, although a higher prevalence of any type HPV was observed in HIV-positive males taking part in this study, this association was not significant (p-value 0.971), which might be because of the high prevalence of HPV infection in the HIV-negative group. Another factor that has been shown, which confers a protective effect against HPV infection, is circumcision (21,22). In this study, although lower odds of penile HPV were observed in men who reported being circumcised, this association was not significant in the bivariate analysis. On the other hand, the only factor significantly associated with multiple-risk HPV infection was having 15 or more lifetime female sexual partners. This latter indicator is a consistent risk factor associated with detecting HPV and has been found to be so by other studies (4).
Our findings need to be interpreted with caution. Since this study was done in an STI setting, our findings are not be generalizable to the general male population of Puerto Rico. In addition, since not enough variability regarding sexual practices was observed, the lack of identification of well-known predictors of HPV infection (such as HIV infection) was not observed in this sample.
In summary, this study has allowed us to confirm that penile HPV infection in a sample of sexually active males, 16 years old or older frequenting a specific STI clinic in PR, is common. HPV types not currently covered by the HPV vaccines were found in some of the study participants. Because of the low vaccination rates indicated by the Vaccination Program from the PR Department of Health among males 16 years old or older in PR, future studies need to target this population for primary prevention. However, since penile cancer disparities have been observed in males in PR, where higher incidence and mortality rates of this type of cancer have been reported in this population compared to what has been seen in other racial/ethnic groups in the US (23,24) and with the burden of anal cancer documented on the island (25,26), increasing the opportunities for secondary prevention in STI settings are recommended.
The project described above was supported by NIDA/NIH grant numbers R03 DA027939-01 and 1R03DA031590-01 and by the National Center for Research Resources (U54 RR02613901A1) and the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (8U54 MD 007587-03) of the National Institutes of Health. The manuscript's contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the sponsors or the PR Department of Health. Sponsors of this study had no part in the design, data collection, analysis, or interpretation of the findings of this study and did not take part in the writing of or decision to publish this manuscript. We wish to express our gratitude to the undergraduate and graduate students from the University of Puerto Rico who participated as part of their research experience. Finally we would like to thank the study participants for their time, Ileska Valencia for her revision of the manuscript, and the clinical staff at the STI clinic faculty for their help and support throughout the study. This project was fully supported by NIH R03 DA027939-01 and the AIDS-Science Track Award for Research Transition (A-START), 1R03DA031590-01, from NIDA. The project was also partially supported by award number U54 RR026139-01A1 from the National Center for Research Resources and award number 8U54 MD 007587-03 from the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or the PR Department of Health.
(1.) Vardas E, Giuliano AR, Goldstone S, et al. External genital human papillomavirus prevalence and associated factors among heterosexual men on 5 continents. J Infect Dis 2011;203:58-65.
(2.) Giuliano AR, Tortolero-Luna G, Ferrer E, et al. Epidemiology of human papillomavirus infection in men, cancers other than cervical and benign conditions. Vaccine 2008;26(suppl 10):K17-K28.
(3.) Grahovac B, Doric A, HruskarZ, HadzisejdicI, Grahovac M. Human Papillomavirus Infection in Croatian Men: Prevalence and HPV Type Distribution. Available at: http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/33069/ InTech- Human_papillomavirus_infection_in_croatian_men_prevalence_and_hpv_type_distribut ion.pdf.Accessed October 10, 2013.
(4.) Dunne EF, Nielson CM, Stone KM, Markowitz LE, Giuliano AR. Prevalence of HPV infection among men: A systematic review of the literature. J Infect Dis 2006; 194:1044-1057.
(5.) Castellsague X, Bosch FX, Munoz N. The male role in cervical cancer. Salud Publica Mex 2003;45(suppl 3):S345-S353.
(6.) Wikstrom A, Popescu C, Forslund O. Asymptomatic penile HPV infection: a prospective study. Int J STD AIDS 2000; 11:80-84.
(7.) Tang X, Xu AE, Dong XP, Sun XK, Shen H, Liu JF. Epidemiological investigation of human papillomavirus infection in men attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic in Hangzhou area. Biomed Environ Sci 2006;19:153-157.
(8.) Baldwin SB, Wallace DR, Papenfuss MR, et al. Human papillomavirus infection in men attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic. J Infect Dis 2003;187:1064-1070.
(9.) Strand A, Rylander E, Evander M, Wadell G. Genital human papillomavirus infection among patients attending an STD clinic. Genitourin Med 1993;69:446-449.
(10.) Svare El, Kjaer SK, Worm AM, Osterlind A, Meijer CJ, van den Brule AJ. Risk factors for genital HPV DNA in men resemble those found in women: a study of male attendees at a Danish STD clinic. Sex Transm Infect 2002;78:215-218.
(11.) Bleeker MC, Hogewoning CJ, Berkhof J, et al. Concordance of specific human papillomavirus types in sex partners is more prevalent than would be expected by chance and is associated with increased viral loads. Clin Infect Dis 2005;41:612-620.
(12.) Muller EE, Chirwa TF, Lewis DA. Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in heterosexual South African men attending sexual health services: associations between HPV and HIV serostatus. Sex Transm Infect 2010;86:175-180.
(13.) Markowitz LE, Dunne EF, Saraiya M, Lawson HW, Chesson H, Unger ER; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 2007;56:1-24.
(14.) Kane MA. Preventing cancer with vaccines: progress in the global control of cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2012;5:24-29.
(15.) Meites E, Llata E, Hariri S, et al. HPV vaccine implementation in STD clinics-STD Surveillance Network. Sex Transm Dis 2012; 39:32-34.
(16.) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Recommendations on the use of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in males-Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2011. MMWR 2011;60:1705-1708.
(17.) Stupiansky NW, Alexander AB, Zimet GD. Human papillomavirus vaccine and men: what are the obstacles and challenges. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2012;25:86-91.
(18.) Clatts MC, Rodriguez-Diaz CE, Garcia H, et al. Sexually transmitted infections clinics as strategic venues for targeting high-risk populations for HIV research and sexual health interventions. P R Health Sci J 2011;30:101-108.
(19.) Weaver BA, Feng Holmes KK, et al. Evaluation of genital sites and sampling techniques for detection of human papillomavirus DNA in men. J Infect Dis 2004; 189:677-685.
(20.) LARC (2012). Human papillomaviruses. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum, Vol 100B. Available at: Url: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol100B/mono100B-11.pdf. Accessed October 15, 2013.
(21.) Wilson LE, Gravitt P, Tobian AA, et al. Male circumcision reduces penile high-risk human papillomavirus viral load in a randomised clinical trial in Rakai, Uganda. Sex Transm Infect 2013;89:262-266.
(22.) Albero G, Castellsague X, Giuliano AR, Bosch FX. Male circumcision and genital human papillomavirus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Dis 2012;39:104-113.
(23.) Colon-Lopez V, Ortiz AP, Soto-Salgado M, et al. Penile cancer disparities in Puerto Rican men as compared to the United States population. Int Braz J Urol 2012;38:728-738.
(24.) Ortiz AP, Perez-Irizarry J, Soto-Salgado M, et al. Human papillomavirus- related cancers among people living with AIDS in Puerto Rico. Prev Chronic Dis 2014; 11 :E80.
(25.) Colon-Lopez V, Ortiz AP, Soto-Salgado M, et al. Survival from anal cancer among Hispanics-Puerto Rico, 2000-2007. J Gastrointest Cancer 2014;45:234-238.
(26.) Ortiz AP, Ortiz-Ortiz KJ, Traverso-Ortiz M, Rios MY, Colon-Lopez V, Palefsky JM. Anal cancer trends in Puerto Rico from 1985 to 2005: the potential impact of the AIDS epidemic. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2014;28:165-167.
Vivian Colon-Lopez, PhD, MPH * ([dagger]); Ana Patricia Ortiz, PhD, MPH * ([double dagger]); Lizbeth Del Toro-Mejias, MS ([section]); Michael Clatts, PhD **; Greduvel Duran-Guzman, MD, MPH ([dagger][dagger]); Naydi Perez, MS, CTR ([double dagger][double dagger]); Maria DaCosta, MS ([section][section]); Joel Palefsky, MD ([section][section])
* Cancer Control and Population Sciences Program, University of Puerto Rico Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Juan, PR; ([dagger]) Department of Health Services Administration, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, PR; ([dagger][dagger]) Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, PR; ([section]) UPR/MDACC: Partnership for Excellence in Cancer Research Program, San Juan, PR; ** Center for Research on Global Health, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, PR; ([double dagger]) Puerto Rico Department of Health, San Juan, PR; ([double dagger])([double dagger]) Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, PR; ([section])([section]) Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California, San Francisco, CA
The authors have no conflicts of interests to disclose.
Address correspondence to: Vivian Colon-Lopez, PhD, MPH, PO Box 365067, San Juan, PR 00936-5067. E-mail: email@example.com
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of a sample of Hispanic males who went to an STI clinic in San Juan, Puerto Rico Variable N [bar.x] Sociodemographic characteristics Age 206 37.8 N % Education Level * <High School 35 17.6% High School 72 36.2% >High School 92 46.2% Employed Yes 122 61.3% Annual Income * None 56 28.1% <$15,000 102 51.3% [greater than or equal to] $15,000 41 20.6% Marital Status ** Single, never married 116 58.3% Married or cohabitating 52 26.1% Separated or divorced 30 15.1% Type of Health Insurance *** None 36 18.8% Public 118 61.5% Private 38 19.8% Substance Used (last 90 days) Tobacco 88 55% Alcohol 99 62% Illicit Drug Use Marihuana 43 21.6% Cocaine 14 7.0% * missing values, n = 7; ** missing values, n = 8; *** missing values, n = 14 Table 2. Prevalence of penile HPV types HPV type Penile (n = 205) % (95% CI) Any HPV type 163 79.5 (73.3-84.8) High-risk (HR) * 32 ** 32.4 (24.1-41.7) 16 6 13.9 18 2 4.7 31 7 16.3 33 2 4.7 35 12 27.9 39 2 4.7 45 1 2.3 51 5 11.6 52 1 2.3 56 1 2.3 58 1 2.3 66 3 7.0 Low-risk (LR) 86 ** 73.5 (64.5-81.2) 6/11 40 33.3 32/42 2 1.6 54 3 2.5 61 8 6.7 62 5 4.2 71 3 2.5 72 3 2.5 81 8 6.7 83 3 2.5 84 29 24.2 86/87 4 3.3 90/106 7 5.8 Mix 1 5 4.2 Multiple ([dagger]) 52 ** 46.0 (36.6-55.6) Undetermined (Unclassified) ([double dagger]) 6 ** 5.3 (2.0-11.2) * HR HPV type 73 was tested, but it was not found in this sample; ** Among those who could be typed (n=113); ([dagger]) Those that have two or more HPV types; ([double dagger]) Those who had HPV detected using the consensus probe mixture but were negative for all specific HPV genotype probes. Table 3. Magnitude of the associations between sociodemographics, lifestyle, clinical factors and penile HPV infection Any HPV type Variable Prevalence OR ([dagger]) (%) (95% CI) Sociodemographic characteristics Employed No 61 (80.3) 1.00 Yes 97 (79.5) 0.95 (0.47-1.95) Marital Status Single, never married 97(84.3) 1.00 Married/cohabitating 40 (76.9) 0.79 (0.37-1.70) Separated or divorced 20 (66.7) 0.44 (0.19-1.02) Risk Factors Substance Use (last 90 days) Used Tobacco No 70 (75.3) 1.00 Yes 88 (83.8) 1.70 (0.84-3.43) Used Alcohol No 59 (72.8) 1.00 Yes 99 (84.6) 2.05 (1.02-4.14) * Sexual Behaviors and Other Practices Used Condom (last sexual event) No 35 (83.3) 1.00 Yes 46 (80.7) 0.84 (0.29-2.38) Lifetime Female Sexual Partners <5 partners 48 (72.7) 1.00 5-14 partners 51 (79.7) 0.99 (0.47-2.08) [greater than or equal to] 15 partners 52 (86.7) 1.96 (0.85-4.56) P-value for trend 0.054 Lifetime Anal-Sex Partners (Insertive & Receptive) [less than or equal to] 1 partner 6 (85.7) 1.00 2-9 partners 14 (73.7) 0.68 (0.23-2.02) [greater than or equal to] 10 partners 25 (71.4) 0.56 (0.25-1.30) P-value for trend 0.489 Circumcised No 104 (78.8) 1.00 Yes 54 (81.8) 1.21 (0.57-2.57) Sexual Identity MSW 115 (82.7) 1.00 MSM 42 (72.4) 0.55 (0.27-1.13) Self-reported STIs HIV No 94 (82.5) 1.00 Yes 64 (76.2) 0.98 (0.42-2.28) Syphilis No 133 (80.6) 1.00 Yes 25 (78.1) 0.86 (0.34-2.16) Health Services New Patient at the STI Clinic No 113 (79.0) 1.00 Yes 45 (81.8) 1.20 (0.54-2.65) Low-risk types Variable Prevalence OR ([dagger]) (%) (95% CI) Sociodemographic characteristics Employed No 30 (35.3) 1.00 Yes 55 (64.7) 1.49 (0.63-3.51) Marital Status Single, never married 50 (59.5) 1.00 Married/cohabitating 24 (28.6) 1.24 (0.47-3.27) Separated or divorced 10 (11.9) 1.15 (0.29-4.52) Risk Factors Substance Use (last 90 days) Used Tobacco No 37 (43.5) 1.00 Yes 48 (56.5) 1.39 (0.59-3.23) Used Alcohol No 35 (41.2) 1.00 Yes 50 (58.8) 1.01 (0.42-2.37) Sexual Behaviors and Other Practices Used Condom (last sexual event) No 23 (53.5) 1.00 Yes 20 (46.5) 0.68 (0.21-2.14) Lifetime Female Sexual Partners <5 partners 30 (37.0) 1.00 5-14 partners 26 (32.1) 0.72 (0.29-1.74) [greater than or equal to] 15 partners 25 (30.9) 0.92 (0.37-2.31) P-value for trend 0.546 Lifetime Anal-Sex Partners (Insertive & Receptive) [less than or equal to] 1 partner 4 (13.8) 1.00 2-9 partners 7 (24.1) 1.03 (0.33-3.13) [greater than or equal to] 10 partners 18 (62.1) 1.02 (0.10-10.25) P-value for trend 0.428 Circumcised No 59 (69.4) 1.00 Yes 26 (30.6) 0.62 (0.26-1.49) Sexual Identity MSW 57 (67.9) 1.00 MSM 27 (32.1) 1.49 (0.57-3.91) Self-reported STIs HIV No 50 (58.8) 1.00 Yes 35 (41.2) 0.65 (0.28-1.52) Syphilis No 70 (83.3) 1.00 Yes 14 (16.7) 1.25 (0.38-4.16) Health Services New Patient at the STI Clinic No 61 (71.8) 1.00 Yes 24 (28.2) 1.23 (0.46-3.27) High-risk types Variable Prevalence OR ([dagger]) (%) (95% CI) Sociodemographic characteristics Employed No 16 (43.2) 1.00 Yes 21 (56.8) 0.70 (0.31-1.58) Marital Status Single, never married 23 (62.2) 1.00 Married/cohabitating 11 (29.7) 1.20 (0.50-2.87) Separated or divorced 3 (8.1) 0.59 (0.15-2.29) Risk Factors Substance Use (last 90 days) Used Tobacco No 14 (37.8) 1.00 Yes 23 (62.2) 1.60 (0.72-3.56) Used Alcohol No 17 (45.9) 1.00 Yes 20 (54.1) 0.75 (0.34-1.65) Sexual Behaviors and Other Practices Used Condom (last sexual event) No 9 (47.4) 1.00 Yes 10 (52.6) 1.22 (0.41-3.66) Lifetime Female Sexual Partners <5 partners 16 (45.7) 1.00 5-14 partners 9 (25.7) 0.56 (0.23-1.36) [greater than or equal to] 15 partners 10 (28.6) 0.81 (0.34-1.95) P-value for trend 0.199 Lifetime Anal-Sex Partners (Insertive & Receptive) [less than or equal to] 1 partner 1 (7.7) 1.00 2-9 partners 1 (7.7) 0.87 (0.30-2.48) [greater than or equal to] 10 partners 11 (84.6) 0.68 (0.07-6.82) P-value for trend 0.082 Circumcised No 28 (75.7) 1.00 Yes 9 (24.3) 0.53 (0.22-1.28) Sexual Identity MSW 24 (64.9) 1.00 MSM 13 (35.1) 1.41 (0.61-3.29) Self-reported STIs HIV No 16 (43.2) 1.00 Yes 21 (56.8) 2.17 (0.98-4.82) Syphilis No 32 (86.5) 1.00 Yes 5 (13.5) 0.75 (0.24-2.31) Health Services New Patient at the STI Clinic No 31 (83.8) 1.00 Yes 6 (16.2) 0.40 (0.15-1.09) Multiple types Variable Prevalence OR ([dagger]) (%) (95% CI) Sociodemographic characteristics Employed No 22 (36.1) 1.00 Yes 30 (30.9) 0.79 (0.40-1.56) Marital Status Single, never married 31 (32.0) 1.00 Married/cohabitating 14 (35.0) 1.13 (0.53-2.41) Separated or divorced 7 (35.0) 1.11 (0.42-2.98) Risk Factors Substance Use (last 90 days) Used Tobacco No 23 (32.9) 1.00 Yes 29 (33.0) 1.00 (0.52-1.96) Used Alcohol No 22 (37.3) 1.00 Yes 30 (30.3) 0.73 (0.37-1.44) Sexual Behaviors and Other Practices Used Condom (last sexual event) No 16 (45.7) 1.00 Yes 15 (32.6) 0.58 (0.23-1.42) Lifetime Female Sexual Partners <5 partners 12 (25.0) 1.00 5-14 partners 12 (23.5) 0.52 (0.24-1.10) [greater than or equal to] 15 partners 25 (48.1) 2.71 (1.35-5.44) * P-value for trend 0.013 Lifetime Anal-Sex Partners (Insertive & Receptive) [less than or equal to] 1 partner 3 (50.0) 1.00 2-9 partners 5 (35.7) 1.15 (0.36-3.61) [greater than or equal to] 10 partners 4 (16.0) 0.34 (0.11-1.04) P-value for trend 0.058 Circumcised No 36 (34.6) 1.00 Yes 16 (29.6) 0.80 (0.39-1.62) Sexual Identity MSW 41 (35.7) 1.00 MSM 10 (23.8) 0.56 (0.25-1.26) Self-reported STIs HIV No 30 (31.9) 1.00 Yes 22 (34.4) 1.12 (0.57-2.19) Syphilis No 45 (33.8) 1.00 Yes 7 (28.0) 0.76 (0.30-1.96) Health Services New Patient at the STI Clinic No 37 (32.7) 1.00 Yes 15 (33.3) 1.03 (0.49-2.14) ([dagger]) estimated OR with 95% CI; ([dagger]) statistically significant p-value<0.05; MSW = Men who have sex with women; MSM = Men who have sex with men
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||FULL-LENGTH ARTICLES|
|Author:||Colon-Lopez, Vivian; Ortiz, Ana Patricia; Del Toro-Mejias, Lizbeth; Clatts, Michael; Duran-Guzman, G|
|Publication:||Puerto Rico Health Sciences Journal|
|Date:||Sep 1, 2015|
|Previous Article:||Methods in HPV surveillance: experiences from a population-based study of hpv infection among women in the San Juan Metropolitan Area of Puerto Rico.|
|Next Article:||Knowledge of case workers and correctional officers towards HIV and HCV infections: opportunity for public health education in the correctional...|