Printer Friendly

Prevalence, virulence and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Aeromonas spp. isolated from children with diarrhea.


Aeromonas species are aerobic and anaerobic Gram-negative bacilli, which grow under alkaline conditions (optimum pH 5.5-9.0).1,2 Some clinically isolated Aeromonas spp. are pathogenic to humans. Gastroenteritis is the most common type of Aeromonas infection in humans. The clinical picture varies from simple diarrhea to massive invasive dysentery. Furthermore, these bacteria have been isolated from fecal samples of children aged under five years and from other organs such as meninges, peritoneum and endocardium in adults. (3) Aeromonas spp. can cause short-term or long-term diarrhea in older or immunosuppressed children. (4) However, evidence for the enteropathogenic role of Aeromonas spp. has been controversial. (1) The bacteria produce a wide range of exoenzymes (e.g., enterotoxins); however, some species do not express toxin genes. Two groups of enterotoxins have been described in Aeromonas spp., including cytotoxic enterotoxin and cytotonic enterotoxin. (5) Cytotoxic enterotoxin (encoded by act) can cause hemolysis and cytotoxicity as well as enterotoxicity. (6) The toxin plays an important role in the pathogenesis of A. hydrophila and is associated with aerolysin; (7) it creates pores in the cell membrane, resulting in the cell death. In contrast, Ast and Alt cytotonic enterotoxins do not affect epithelial tissues. The action mechanism of these toxins is mostly similar to the cyclic adenosine monophosphate and prostaglandin-mediated mechanism of cholera toxin in intestinal epithelial cells. (8) Two hemolytic toxins, including hemolysin [AHH.sub.1] (hlyA) and aerolysin (aerA), have been described in the bacteria. Hemolysin [AHH.sub.1] is similar to hlyA hemolysin in Vibrio cholerae and aerolysin to aerA in V. cholerae. The effects of these toxins include hemolysis, cytotoxicity and enhanced virulence. (9) The aim of the current study was to assess the prevalence of Aeromonas spp. and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern in children with diarrhea referred to the Children Medical Center in Tehran, between 2013 and 2014. Furthermore, act, ast, alt, aerA and hlyA virulence genes were characterized in the isolated Aeromonas spp.


A total number of 391 stool samples were collected from children with ages between 1 day and 14 years old, with diarrhea (acute or chronic), referred to the Children Medical Center, Tehran, Iran, from July 2013 to December 2014. Samples were enriched first in alkaline peptone water broth and incubated at 37[degrees]C for 18-24 hours. A loop of this mixture was subcultured in CIN (cefsulodin, irgasan, novobiocin) agar, MacConkey agar and blood agar containing 5% of sheep blood and 10 [micro]/mL of ampicillin. Colonies on ampicillin blood agar (ABA) were checked for hemolysis and results were recorded (except for A. enteropelogenes, which is not resistant to ampicillin). Oxidase test and Gram staining were carried out for the colonies. Negative lactose colonies grown on CIN agar and MacConkey agar were also subcultured on ABA. Tests for species identification included production of acetylmethylcarbinol (Voges-Proskauer), fermentation of glucose and lactose (Kligler), gas production from glucose, acid production from arabinose, lysine decarboxylase, ornithine decarboxylase, arginine dihydrolase and esculin hydrolase. Furthermore, 20E-API system biochemical tests (BioMerieux, Marcy-l'Etoile, France) were used to identify Enterobacteriaceae and Gram-negative bacilli. Results were analyzed in comparison with the 23S rRNA results. All culture media were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Bacterial susceptibility to antimicrobials was carried out using the Kirby-Bauer method according to CLSI guidelines. A colony of the bacteria was inoculated in a test tube containing broth media. Broth culture was incubated at 35 [degrees]C until it reached 0.5 McFarland turbidity. Broth was recultured on Mueller-Hilton agar plates (Merck). Antimicrobial disks were placed on the plates and incubated at 37[degrees]C for 16-18 h before results were read. The antimicrobials were also selected according to CLSI guidelines. (10) Antimicrobial disks (Mast, Bootle, UK) used for the susceptibility test included chloramphenicol (30 [micro]g), ciprofloxacin (5 [micro]g), gentamicin (10 [micro]g), nalidixic acid (30 [micro]g), tetracycline (30 [micro]g), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX, 25 [micro]g), streptomycin (10 [micro]g), ampicillin (10 [micro]g), cefoxitin (30 [micro]g), amikacin (30 [micro]g), ceftizoxime (30 [micro]g), cefotaxime (30 [micro]g) and cefepime (30 [micro]g).

DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction

DNA was extracted from the bacterial colonies using boiling method and stored at -20[degrees]C until use. A 23S rRNA gene was used to confirm the isolated Aeromonas spp., generating a 550 bp fragment. (11) Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the virulence genes was carried out based on an original protocol by Sreedharan et al. (2012). (9) The primers used in this study are described in Table 1. PCR master mix (SinaClon BioScience Co, Tehran, Iran) was prepared in a final volume of 20 [micro]L including 1X buffer, 1.5 mM of Mg[Cl.sub.2], 0.2 mM of dNTPs, 10pM of each primer, 0.5 IU/[micro]L of Taq DNA polymerase, 1 [micro]L of the template DNA and sufficient amount of sterile distilled water. PCR reaction was thermally cycled (Peqlab Primus 96, Peqlab Biotechnologie GmbH, Erlangen, Germany) under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94[degrees]C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles, each cycle including denaturation at 94[degrees]C for 30 sec, annealing at 60[degrees]C for 30 sec, and extension at 72[degrees]C for 30 sec. Final extension included incubation at 72[degrees]C for 5 min. Amplicons were electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gels and visualized under UV. Thermal cycle conditions for other genes were similar to those of 23S rRNA gene except that the annealing temperature included 56[degrees]C for act and ast, 58[degrees]C for alt and aerA and 68[degrees]C for hlyA.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using Chi-Square (Exact method) analysis on SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 14 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Il, USA). P-values [less than or equal to] 0.050 were considered as significant.


Of 391 samples from children suffering from diarrhea (223 males, 57%; 168 females, 43%), 12 Aeromonas spp. were isolated including three (0.8%) A. hydrophila, five (1.3%) A. caviae and four (1%) A. veronii. Results showed no significant correlation between the pathogens and the participants' age (p=0.730, [chi](3)=1.56). No significant correlation was seen between the pathogen and the participants' sex (p=0.160, [chi](1)=2.23). No significant correlation was observed between bacterial isolation and the duration of diarrhea in participants (p=0.910, [chi](2)=0.801), nor the feces pH (p=0.600, [chi] (3)=2.02). Five patients (41.7%) showed watery diarrhea, six (50%) dysentery and ten (83.3%) mucoid diarrhea. No significant correlation was seen between bacterial isolation and the number of white or red blood cells in feces of the participants (p=0.379, [chi](4)=3.354 and p=0.300, [chi](4)=4.344, respectively). Furthermore, no significance was observed between bacterial isolation and the diarrheal form (Table 2).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Second to ampicillin (which was included in the growth medium used), the highest rate of antimicrobial resistance was seen against nalidixic acid and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (5 isolates each, 41.6%). The lowest rate of antimicrobial resistance was seen against gentamicin, amikacin and cefepime (none of the isolates) (Table 3). A. veronii showed antimicrobial resistance to TMP-SMX and streptomycin (50%) and susceptibility to cefoxitin (100%), compared to other species which showed no resistance to TMP-SMX and streptomycin and resistance to cefoxitin. A. hydrophila showed antimicrobial resistance to tetracycline (33%) and susceptibility to cefotaxime (100%), compared to other species which showed no resistance to tetracycline and resistance to cefotaxime. A. caviae demonstrated resistance to ceftazidime (20%) and susceptibility to nalidixic acid (100%), compared to other species which demonstrated no resistance to ceftazidime and resistance to nalidixic acid.

Polymerase chain reaction

PCR results for 23S rRNA genes confirmed the identity of all Aeromonas isolates. Molecular identification of the virulence genes showed that 76.4%, 64.7%, 71.5%, 83.3% and 11.7% of the Aeromonas isolates included act, ast, alt, aerA and hlyA genes, respectively (Table 4).


Gastroenteritis is the most common type of infection caused by Aeromonas spp. in humans. Clinical symptoms vary from chronic watery diarrhea to massive dysentery. (12) Clinical symptoms include fever, stomach ache, nausea and vomiting. In the current study, patients had at least two clinical symptoms and 50% of them had numerous red blood cells in their feces. These results were similar to the results of another study by Soltan Dallal et al. (2004) in which 14 (5.4%) Aeromonas spp. including eight A. veronii, five A. caviae and one A. hydrophila were isolated from a total sum of 310 bacterial samples. (13) Several virulence genes can influence the pathogenicity of Aeromonas spp. (14) The cytotoxic enterotoxin act is closely associated with aerA. Products of both genes include hemolytic and cytotoxic effects and are lethal to mice. (15) In 1997, Albert et al. reported differences between control and environmental samples. (16) In samples isolated from children with diarrhea, ast, alt and both genes were found in 15.7%, 16.5% and 55.7% of the isolates, respectively. Albert et al. also identified ast alone, alt alone and both genes in 25.9%, 33.3% and 22.2% of the control isolates, respectively. Furthermore, ast alone, alt alone and both ast and alt were found in 30%, 16.7% and 33.3% of the environmental isolates, respectively. (15) Albert suggested that isolates which included ast and alt genes caused watery diarrhea and isolates which included alt gene caused loose stools. In the present study, act, ast, alt, aerA and hlyA genes were identified in 76.4%, 64.7%, 71.5%, 83.3% and 11.7% of the isolates, respectively. Of 191 A. caviae isolates studied by Kingombe et al. in 1999, alt was found in 164 (86%) and act in 68 (36%) isolates. (17) Moreover, of 206 A. hydrophila isolates, act was detected in 171 (83%) and alt in 181 (88%) isolates, while ast was limited to the control strains.

Aeromonas spp. are not usually identified in clinical laboratories; also, prescription of ineffective antimicrobials has increased the antimicrobial resistance pattern of these bacteria. In the current study, antimicrobial resistance was reported in nearly 21.77% of the total isolates; most displayed multiple resistance. Resistance to nalidixic acid and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was detected in five isolates each (41.6%). Furthermore, three isolates (25%) were moderately resistant to ciprofloxacin. In a study by Soltan Dallal et al. (2004), (13) resistance to nalidixic acid and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was reported in 7.1% and 28.6% of the isolates respectively while no resistance to ciprofloxacin was reported. In another study by Sinha et al. during 2000-2001, resistance to nalidixic acid was detected in 62.8% and 54.4% and to ciprofloxacin in 22.4% and 12.3% of the isolates. (18) In a 9-year study by Yamada et al. (1986-1995), resistance to nalidixic acid was reported in nearly 3% of the isolates. (19) Therefore, these studies have shown that resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and nalidixic acid has increased over the past decades. In the present study, three isolates (25%) were resistant to tetracycline and cefoxitin each. Resistance to tetracycline has previously been identified in 25% of A. veronii isolates by Yamada et al. (19) Vila et al. (20) (2003) detected tetracycline resistance in 55.6% and 71.4% of A. veronii and A. caviae isolates, respectively. Moreover, they found that no isolates were resistant to cefoxitin while all were resistant to ampicillin.


In summary, the results of the present study have demonstrated that clinically important Aeromonas spp. include multiple virulence genes. Furthermore, antimicrobial resistance to the selected antimicrobials has increased in recent years; similar to that in other countries. However 25% of the isolates were intermediately resistant to ciprofloxacin, and resistance to quinolones should carefully be considered due to the importance of these antimicrobials in the treatment of infections caused by Aeromonas spp.

Authors' contributions statement: MMSD designed and supervised the study, provided research laboratory and master edited the manuscript. RMNF scientifically advised the study, reviewed the literature and edited the final version of the manuscript. MKT prepared the proposal and practically carried out the study. LA preliminarily drafted the manuscript. ZS collected and statistically analyzed data. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest: All authors--none to declare.

Funding This work was supported by a Vice-Chancellor for Research grant (No. 21989), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Acknowledgment: We thank Children Medical Center for providing isolates and epidemiological and demographic data.


(1.) Janda JM, Abbott SL. The genus taxonomy, pathogenicity, and infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23:35-73. [Crossref] [PubMed] [FullText]

(2.) Ghenghesh KS, Ahmed SF, El-Khalek RA, Al-Gendy A, Klena J. Aeromonas-associated infections in developing countries. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2008;2:81-98. [Crossref] [PubMed]

(3.) Igbinosa IH, Igumbor EU, Aghdasi F, Tom M, Okoh AI. Emerging Aeromonas species infections and their significance in public health. Sci World J 2012;2012:625023. [Crossref] [PubMed] [FullText]

(4.) Daskalov H. The importance of Aeromonas hydrophila in food safety. Food Control. 2006;17:474-83. [Crossref]

(5.) Tomas JM. The main Aeromonas pathogenic factors. ISRN Microbiol. 2012;2012:256261. [Crossref] [PubMed] [FullText]

(6.) Asao T, Kinoshita Y, Kozaki S, Uemura T, Sakaguchi G. Purification and some properties of Aeromonas hydrophila hemolysin. Infect Immun 1984;46:122-7. [PubMed] [FullText]

(7.) Galindo CL, Gutierrez Jr C, Chopra AK. Potential involvement of galectin-3 and SNAP23 in Aeromonas hydrophila cytotoxic enterotoxin-induced host cell apoptosis. Microb Pathog. 2006;40:56-68. [Crossref] [PubMed]

(8.) Chakraborty T, Montenegro MA, Sanyal SC, Helmuth R, Bulling E, Timmis KN. Cloning of enterotoxin gene from Aeromonas hydrophila provides conclusive evidence of production of a cytotonic enterotoxin. Infect Immun 1984;46:435-41. [PubMed] [FullText]

(9.) Sreedharan K, Philip R, Singh IS. Virulence potential and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of motile aeromonads associated with freshwater ornamental fish culture systems: a possible threat to public health. Braz J Microbiol 2012;43:754-65. [Crossref] [PubMed] [FullText]

(10.) Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Methods for Antimicrobial Dilution and Disk Susceptibility Testing of Infrequently Isolated Fastidious Bacteria; Approved Guideline. Second Edition. CLSI document M45A2. Wayne, PA: 2010.

(11.) Osman KM, Amin ZM, Aly MA, Hassan H, Soliman WS. SDS-PAGE heat-shock protein profiles of environmental Aeromonas strains. Polish J Microbiol 2011;60:149-54. [PubMed]

(12.) Puthucheary SD, Puah SM, Chua KH. Molecular characterization of clinical isolates of Aeromonas species from Malaysia. PloS One 2012;7:e30205. [Crossref] [PubMed] [FullText]

(13.) Soltan Dallal MM, Moezardalan K. Aeromonas spp. associated with children's diarrhoea in Tehran: a case control study. Ann Trop Paediatr 2004;24:45-51. [Crossref] [PubMed]

(14.) Barnett TC, Kirov SM, Strom MS, Sanderson K. Aeromonas spp. possess at least two distinct type IV pilus families. Microb Pathog 1997;23:241-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]

(15.) Sha J, Erova TE, Alyea RA, et al. Surface-expressed enolase contributes to the pathogenesis of clinical isolate SSU of Aeromonas hydrophila. J Bacteriol 2009;191:3095-107. [Crossref] [PubMed] [FullText]

(16.) Albert MJ, Ansaruzzaman M, Talukder KA, et al. Prevalence of enterotoxin genes in Aeromonas spp. isolated from children with diarrhea, healthy controls, and the environment. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:3785-90. [PubMed] [FullText]

(17.) Kingombe CIB, Huys G, Tonolla M, et al. PCR detection, characterization, and distribution of virulence genes in Aeromonas spp. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999;65:5293-302. [PubMed] [FullText]

(18.) Sinha S, Shimada T, Ramamurthy T, et al. Prevalence, serotype distribution, antibiotic susceptibility and genetic profiles of mesophilic Aeromonas species isolated from hospitalized diarrhoeal cases in Kolkata, India. J Med Microbiol 2004;53(Pt 6):527-34. [Crossref] [PubMed]

(19.) Yamada S, Matsushita S, Dejsirilert S, Kudoh Y. Incidence and clinical symptoms of Aeromonas-associated travelers' diarrhoea in Tokyo. Epidemiol Infect 1997;119:121-6. [Crossref] [PubMed] [FullText]

(20.) Vila J, Ruiz J, Gallardo F, et al. Aeromonas spp. and traveler's diarrhea: clinical features and antimicrobial resistance. Emerg Infect Dis 2003;9:552-5. [Crossref] [PubMed] [FullText]

doi: 10.11599/germs.2016.1094

Mohammad Mehdi Soltan Dallal [1],*, Ramin Mazaheri Nezhad Fard [2], Morteza Kavan Talkhabi [3], Leyla Aghaiyan [4], Zohre Salehipour [5]

Received: 02 March 2016; revised 30 April 2016, 04 July 2016 and 23 July 2016; accepted: 13 August 2016 [1] PhD, Professor of Microbiology, Division of Food Microbiology, Department of Pathobiology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Food Microbiology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; [2] PhD, Division of Food Microbiology, Department of Pathobiology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; [3] MSc, Division of Medical Bacteriology, Department of Pathobiology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; [4] DVM, Professional Doctorate Student in Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran; [5] PhD of Medical Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. * Corresponding author: Mohammad Mehdi Soltan Dallal, Professor of Microbiology, Division of Food Microbiology, Department of Pathobiology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Food Microbiology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box: 6446-14155, Tehran, Iran.
Table 1. Primers used in PCRs

Gene       Sequence                                bp    Ref.

23s rRNA   F5'-GGAAACTTCTTGGCGAAAAC                550    10
hlyA       F5'-GGCCGGTGGCCCGAAGATACGGG-3'          597    9
act        F 5 '-AGAAGGTGACCACCAAGAACA-3'          232    9
alt        F 5 '-TGACCCAGTCCTGGCACGGG3'            442    9
ast        F 5'- TCTCCATGCTTCCCTTCCACT-3'          331    9

Table 2. Association of diarrheal form and Aeromonas spp. isolated in
the current study

                        Aeromonas positive   Aeromonas negative
Diarrheal form          n (%)                n (%)

Watery diarrhea   Yes   5 (41.7)             202 (53.4)
                  No    7 (58.3)             176 (46.6)
Dysentery         Yes   6 (50)               125 (33.1)
                  No    6 (50)               253 (66.9)
Mucoid diarrhea   Yes   10 (83.3)            289 (76.3)
                  No    2 (16.7)             90 (23.7)

Diarrheal form          n (%)        P-value

Watery diarrhea   Yes   207 (53.1)   0.056
                  No    183 (46.9)
Dysentery         Yes   131 (33.6)   0.220
                  No    259 (66.4)
Mucoid diarrhea   Yes   299 (75.5)   0.740
                  No    92 (23.5)

Table 3. Results of antibacterial susceptibility tests

Antibiotic        S (%)       I (%)      R (%) *

Ampicillin **     0 (0)       0 (0)      12 (100)
Gentamicin        12 (100)    0 (0)      0 (0)
Tetracycline      8 (66)      1 (8.3)    3 (25)
Cefoxitin         6 (50)      3 (25)     3 (25)
Nalidixic acid    7 (58.3)    0 (0)      5 (41.6)
Amikacin          12 (100)    0 (0)      0 (0)
Ceftazidime       7 (58.3)    4 (33.3)   1 (8.3)
Chloramphenicol   11 (91.6)   0 (0)      1 (8.3)
TMP-SMX           5 (41.6)    2 (16.6)   5 (41.6)
Cefotaxime        8 (66.6)    2 (16.6)   2 (16.6)
Cefepime          12 (100)    0 (0)      0 (0)
Streptomycin      7 (58.3)    3 (25)     2 (16.6)
Ciprofloxacin     9 (75)      3 (25)     0 (0)

I--intermediate; R--resistant; S--sensitive;

* The total sum percentages do not produce 100 in some cases due to
decimal rounding.

** Ampicillin was included in the growth medium used for culturing
the isolates.

Table 4. Prevalence of virulence genes in bacterial species

Gene   A. veronii n (%)   A. hydrophila n (%)

alt        5 (71.4)             4 (100)
ast        3 (42.8)             4 (100)
act        5 (71.4)             4 (100)
aerA       7 (100)              4 (100)
hlyA        0 (0)               2 (50)

Gene   A. caviae n (%)   Total (%)

alt        3 (50)          71.5
ast       4 (66.6)         64.7
act       4 (66.6)         76.4
aerA       3 (50)          82.3
hlyA        0 (0)          11.7
COPYRIGHT 2016 Asociatia pentru Cresterea Vizibilitatii Cercetarii Stiintifice (ACVCS)
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Original article
Author:Dallal, Mohammad Mehdi Soltan; Fard, Ramin Mazaheri Nezhad; Talkhabi, Morteza Kavan; Aghaiyan, Leyla
Date:Sep 1, 2016
Previous Article:Syphilis on the rise: a prolonged syphilis outbreak among HIV-infected patients in Northern Greece.
Next Article:Rotavirus gastroenteritis in children less than five years of age in primary care settings in Bulgaria: an observational study.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |