Printer Friendly

Pressing researchers for R&D priorities.

Pressing researchers for R&D priorities

Addressing the National Academy of Sciences at its annual meeting on April 26, Academy President Frank Press proposed what few leaders of science have ever willingly offered: criteria for setting federal research funding priorities. He described them as "politically realistic and responsive to congressional requests for advice."

U.S. scientists are submitting record numbers of research proposals to federal funding agencies. Though generally "superb in quality," Press said, they are also "unprecedented in overall cost. And . . . come at a time of record budget deficits." Moreover, while choices must be made between them, Press said "our political leadership has no way of gauging the amount of resources necessary to maintain the strength of American science and technology."

While scientists do have the ability to set priorities for R&D funding, he maintains that "sniping and carping among scientists" over what to fund threatens to undermine the credibility of those who could offer constructive advice. So he recommends the scientific community -- and especially the Academy -- "be willing, for the first time, to propose [budget] priorities across scientific fields," organized into the following three broad categories:

* programs that have the highest priority and should be funded now, even when money is tight. Examples he gave were programs responding to national crises, such as AIDS; work on "extraordinary scientific breakthroughts," such as high-temperature superconductivity; and grants to preserve the human-resource base through training and the funding of individuals and small groups.

* large projects with important national or scientific goals that should be authorized now, even if full funding for these won't be available immediately. Cited examples included the Superconducting Super Collider and human-genome project.

* political "prerogatives" that support decisions made by the administration and Congress, including the Defense Department's national security initiatives, the space station and programs to enhance the competitiveness of U.S. R&D.
COPYRIGHT 1988 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1988, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Science News
Date:May 14, 1988
Words:308
Previous Article:Many more mouths to feed.
Next Article:NSF lets reviewed review reviewers.
Topics:


Related Articles
S corporation's TMP personally responsible for sec. 6673 penalty.
Fragile bones linked to vitamin D gene.
Children with Down Syndrome: implications for adult-child interactions in inclusive settings.
Redemption distributions of PTE.
ALARCON PROPOSES MUSEUM ON ECOLOGY.
New particles pose puzzle. (Physics).
Vitamin D can improve tenderness of beef.
REIT subsidiary may provide tenants with noncustomary services.
Coos commission may go nonpartisan.
Not-so-jolly holiday behavior.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters