Printer Friendly

Preparation and application of sustained-release potassium ferrate (VI).

1. Introduction

Potassium ferrate(VI), with the formula [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4], as an environmentally friendly water treatment agent with strong oxidizing power, can not only sterilize natural water but also remove various organic and inorganic compounds [1-3]. In addition, its reduction by-product, Fe(III), is an effective flocculent that can absorb suspended solid and hazardous substances [4, 5]. More importantly, compared with chloric disinfection, no hazardous disinfection by-products (DBPs) are generated in [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] treatment of drinking water [6-8]. However, to date, [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] has not yet been widely applied as a replacement for chloric disinfectants in drinking water treatment, mainly due to the poor stability of concentrated [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] [9, 10]. The reduction potential of [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] varies from +0.7 V to +2.2 V in basic and acidic solutions, respectively [3]. The ferrate anion decomposes quickly during the treatment process, resulting in low efficiency for water purification.

The stability of [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] is determined by its purity, the pH value of the solution, and various other factors [11]. Using a hypochlorite oxidation method, Hrostowski and Scott [12] successfully prepared [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] with a purity as high as 96.9%, which dramatically improved its stability during storage. However, this had little effect on the use of [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] given that its stability is still poor during the water treatment process. Wagner et al. [11] reduced the decomposition rate of [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] by controlling the solution pH value. In high pH solution, the concentration of hydrogen ions ([H.sup.2]) is low, leading to only weakcatalytic decomposition. However, controlling pH is not commercially viable in practical water treatment processes.

In the present research, [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] crystals were absorbed into a porous media, diatomite, which has a highly porous structure and high surface area [13], enabling the subsequent slow release of [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] into water in order to prolong the reaction time and consequently improve the efficiency and purification effect of [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4]. This method does not require a specific [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] purity or solution pH value, and, therefore, the technical difficulties and high cost of [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] preparation can be drastically reduced for the practical application of [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] in water purification processes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals. The following chemicals were of analytical reagent grade and used without further purification: ferric nitrate (Sigma Aldrich Reagent Co., Ltd.), calcium hypochlorite (Shun Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.), potassium hydroxide (Chongqing Chuandong Reagent Co., Ltd.), and methyl orange (ChengDu Kelong Chemical Co., Ltd.). Diatomite (Chinasun Specialty Products Co., Ltd.) was of chemically pure grade and was used without further purification.

2.2. Preparation of Sustained-Release [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4]. A paste of 15 g of Ca[(ClO).sub.2] and 25 mL of 13mol/L KOH solution were added to a 100 mL beaker. After mild stirring, the mixture was filtered using an 800-eye filtering cloth and then 20 mL saturated KOH solution was added to the filtrate. The mixture was filtered again using 800-eye filtering cloth and 8 g of Fe[(N[O.sub.3]).sub.2] x 9[H.sub.2]O, which had been ground fully immediately prior to use, was slowly introduced to the filtrate in the ice water bath five times. After 1 hour of continued stirring in an agitator, diatomite was added to the mixture. To achieve samples with different [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] content, 6.92 g, 11.87 g, 18.46 g,

27.69 g, or 41.54 g of diatomite was added to individual samples. Each mixture was stirred for 5 additional minutes, followed by a 30-minute precipitation step in an ice bath. After filtration of the mixture, the filter cake was collected as the sustained-release [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] sample. The theoretical weight of [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] in each sustained-release [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] sample was 27.69 g. The sustained-release [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] samples were labeled as [Fe.sub.80], [Fe.sub.70], [Fe.sub.60],[ Fe.sub.50], and [Fe.sub.40] based on the theoretical mass fraction of [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] in each sample. For example, [Fe.sub.80] indicates that the theoretical mass fraction of [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] in the composite was 80%. When diatomite was not added, the sample contained only [K.sub.2] Fe[O.sub.4].

2.3. Characterization of Sustained-Release [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4]. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the sustained-release [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] samples were obtained using a Shimadzu XRD-6000 diffractometer using Cu K[alpha] radiation (40 kV, 30 mA). Data were recorded over the range from 10[degrees] to 80[degrees] (2[theta]) with a scan rate of 4[degrees] [min.sup.-1]. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) patterns were obtained using a Shimadzu IRPrestige-21 infrared spectrometer with the frequency ranging from 500 to 2000 [cm.sup.-1]. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained using a FEI Quanta 450 scanning electron microscope.

2.4. Ferrate Release Rate of Sustained-Release [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4]. To control the decomposition rate of Fe(VI), the release rate experiment of sustained-release [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] was carried out in an ice water bath. First, 0.1 g pure [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] or a sample of each sustained-release [K.sub.2] Fe[O.sub.4] composite was added to a 250 mL beaker containing 250 mL water. The solution was then agitated at 60 rpm for 30 min in the ice water bath, and, finally, the concentration of Fe(VI) in solution was determined according to the adsorption at 510 nm using a spectrophotometer.

2.5. Degradation of Methyl Orange. Eight test solutions of 20 mg/L methyl orange were prepared by dissolving methyl orange granules in deionized distilled water. Then, 0.125 g [Fe.sub.80], 0.143 g [Fe.sub.70], 0.167 g [Fe.sub.60] , 0.20 0 g [Fe.sub.50], 0.250 g [Fe.sub.40], 0.100 g [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4], 0.043 g diatomite, and a simple mixture of 0.100 g [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] and 0.043 g diatomite were added individually to these test solutions. The theoretical weight of [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] in all seven [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4]-containing samples was 0.100 g. Each test solution was stirred rapidly and then allowed to stand for 20 min. The methyl orange degradation rate was calculated according to the concentration of methyl orange. The concentration of methyl orange was determined by fluorescence spectrophotometry using a Hitachi F-7000 fluorescence spectrophotometer, because methyl orange is a fluorescent substance [14]. The fluorescence intensity varied linearly with methyl orange concentration in the range of 520 mg/L, with a correlation coefficient of 0.998. Therefore, the concentration of methyl orange could be calculated using the fluorescence intensity value through a linear regression equation.

2.6. Degradation of Fluorescent Substances in Natural Water. Water samples were collected before and after liquid chlorine disinfection in a water supply network in Shapingba, Chongqing, China for comparative studies. The water in this networkwas treated for coagulation, sedimentation, and sand filtration before liquid chlorine disinfection. First, 0.015 g [Fe.sub.70] was added to 250 mL water samples and then the changes in the three-dimensional fluorescence patterns were analyzed after a 20-minute reaction time. The resulting changes in fluorescence in the water samples were compared to those after the liquid chlorine disinfection process. Three-dimensional fluorescence patterns were obtained using a Hitachi F-7000 fluorescence spectrophotometer. The concentrations of soluble microbial products and simple aromatic protein also were determined according to the linear regression method used to determine the methyl orange concentration.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. XRD Analysis of Sustained-Release [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4]. The XRD patterns of [Fe.sub.70], [Fe.sub.60], [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4], and diatomite samples are shown in Figure 1. It can be seen that diatomite had two sharp diffraction peaks at 2[theta] = 21.82[degrees] and 36.00[degrees]. [K.sub.2] Fe[O.sub.4] had only one sharp diffraction peak at 2[theta] = 29.72[degrees]. Other diffraction peaks belonged to the residual crystals of KOH and KN[O.sub.3] in the samples. The three sharp diffraction peaks of sustained-release [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] were at 2[theta] = 21.82[degrees], 29.72[degrees], and 36.00[degrees]. Basically, the sharp diffraction peaks of Fe70 and [Fe.sub.60] coincided with those of [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] and diatomite. In other words, no new crystal was generated during the preparation. Therefore, the XRD analysis indicates that [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] and diatomite were combined by physical adsorption, which is beneficial to prevent the loss of [K.sub.2] Fe[O.sub.4] reactivity.

3.2. SEM Analysis of Sustained-Release [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4]. Figure 2 shows SEM representative images of [Fe.sub.70], [Fe.sub.60], [K.sub.2] Fe[O.sub.4], and diatomite samples. The particle size of [K.sub.2] Fe[O.sub.4] was roughly 2 [micro]m. Due to its poor dispersion, an aggregation phenomenon was observed. The particle size of diatomite was approximately 35 [mciro]m, and void spaces (i.e., pores) between the particles were obvious. SEM images demonstrated that the voids in the diatomite were filled with [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] crystals, which even covered the surfaces of the diatomite. The particle size of [K.sub.2] Fe[O.sub.4] in the [Fe.sub.70] samples was nearly the same as that of the pure [K.sub.2] Fe[O.sub.4] sample. Nevertheless, the dispersion of [K.sub.2] Fe[O.sub.4] particles in the [Fe.sub.70] samples was much better than that of the pure [K.sub.2] Fe[O.sub.4] samples. Obvious aggregation of [K.sub.2] Fe[O.sub.4] particles was also visible in the [Fe.sub.60] samples, with [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] crystals covering the diatomite surfaces. The [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] crystals covering the diatomite surfaces can dissolve in the water instantly and participate in the reaction, whereas the [K.sub.2] Fe[O.sub.4] crystals contained in the diatomite pores will dissolve slowly and continuously and then react with substances in solution. Therefore, the SEM analysis indicates that a [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] proportion of 70% in the sustained-release [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] composites is appropriate for continued release of [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4].

3.3. FT-IR Analysis of Sustained-Release [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4]. Figure 3 shows the transmittance FT-IR spectra of [Fe.sub.70], [Fe.sub.60], [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4], and diatomite samples. The IR absorption spectrum of the [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] sample includes a primary peak at 825.53 [cm.sup.-1], which can be recognized as the characteristic peak of Fe[O.sub.4.sup.2-] and is attributed to the stretching vibrations of the Fe-O bond [15,16]. Other peaks maybe the result of impurities in the [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] samples. The absorption peaks of the diatomite sample at 619.15 [cm.sup.-1] and 808.17 [cm.sup.-1] can be assigned to the stretching vibration of SiO-H. Both Fe-O and SiO-H bonds were detected in Fe70 and Fe60 samples, demonstrating the existence of [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] and diatomite in the composite samples.

3.4. Ferrate Release Rate from Sustained-Release [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] Samples. Figure 4 shows the changes in Fe(VI) concentration in solution after the addition of various sustained-release [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] composite samples. The figure shows that when pure [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] was added to the aqueous solution, the Fe(VI) concentration rapidly increased, reaching the maximum concentration within 2 min before beginning to decrease rapidly and showing complete degradation after 10 min. After addition of the sustained-release [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] samples in the aqueous solution, the Fe(VI) concentration was maintained at higher levels for longer periods, and the Fe(VI) decomposition rate was slower than that observed for pure [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4]. Specifically, for the [Fe.sub.70], [Fe.sub.60], [Fe.sub.50], and [Fe.sub.40] samples, the Fe(VI) concentration increased within 5 min, and the highest concentration from [Fe.sub.70] samples reached 99.47 mg/L. These results demonstrate that sustained release of [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] was achieved from the diatomite pores observed in Figure 2. When sustained-release [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] was added to the water, [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] dissolved gradually starting from the outside of the samples and later from the inside of the diatomite pores, releasing Fe(VI) slowly and maintaining a higher concentration of Fe(VI) in solution. Such sustained, continuous release can reduce the decomposition rate of Fe(VI) and thereby improve the probability of interaction between Fe(VI) and pollutants, thus improving the effectiveness of Fe(VI) for water purification.

3.5. Degradation of Methyl Orange. Figure 5 presents the removal rate of methyl orange using different treatment agents. It is evident from this figure that the removal rate of the simple mixture roughly equates the sum of the removal rate of [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] and diatomite. No synergistic effect was observed with the simple mixture of [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] and diatomite. The removal rates of methyl orange by sustainedrelease [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] samples were all higher than that using only [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4]. However, considering that the diatomite within the sustained-release [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] samples could also absorb methyl orange, only the performances of [Fe.sub.70] and [Fe.sub.60] samples were better than those of the simple mixture. Specifically, 0.143 g of [Fe.sub.70] and 0.167 g of [Fe.sub.60] removed 6.49 mg (removal rate of 64.86%) and 4.11 mg (removal rate of 41.08%) of methyl orange, respectively. The removal efficiency of Fe70 was as 2.2 times that of the simple [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] and diatomite mixture. Potassium ferrate formed a good Fe(VI) sustained-release structure, allowing Fe(VI) to be slowly released into the solution and thus reducing the decomposition rate of Fe(VI). As a result, the contact probability between Fe(VI) and methyl orange was increased and thus the removal rate of methyl orange was improved. For the simple mixture of [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] and diatomite, [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] quickly dissolved in the water, and most of the Fe(VI) failed to react with methyl orange. Therefore, the methyl orange removal rate with the simple mixture was significantly less than the rates achieved by the Fe70 and Fe60 samples. These results are consistent with those from the experiment determining the ferrate release rate from sustained-release [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] samples (Figure 4).

A possible reason for the reduced methyl orange removal rate at [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] mass fractions below 60% may be that the dosage of diatomite was high enough to cause an increase in the degradation rate of [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4]. When the [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] mass fraction was above 70%, the crystal shape of the sustainedrelease [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] sample was approxmatelythe same as that of the [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] sample and most of the [K.sub.2] Fe[O.sub.4] crystals failed to be absorbed into the pores of diatomite, which corresponded with a much lower removal rate of methyl orange.

In the process of sample preparation, the actual concentration of [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] is less than the theoretical value. We tested the purity of the prepared [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] and found that it was about 97%, which is close to the theoretical value. However, we could not determine the purity of the sustained release [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4]. However, the preparation time of sustained release [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] is longer, and thus, the actual concentration of [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] in the sample may be significantly less than the theoretical value. For the degradation of methyl orange, the degradation effect is better after adding the theory amount [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4]. This concluded that the degradation effect is better after adding the real amount of [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4].

3.6. Degradation of Fluorescent Substances in Natural Water. Figure 6 shows the three-dimensional fluorescence patterns of water samples treated by traditional chlorine disinfection in a water network and [Fe.sub.70]. Two fluorescence peaks were observed in these patterns at[[gamma].sub.ex]/[[gamma].sub.em] = 275 nm/305 nm and [[gamma].sub.ex]/[[gamma].sub.em] = 225nm/330nm. These peaks represent soluble microbial products and simple aromatic protein [17]. After traditional chlorine disinfection, the fluorescence intensity at 275 nm/305 nm was reduced by 11.86%, but the fluorescence intensity at 225 nm/330 nm remained almost unchanged. The intensities of the two fluorescence peaks were reduced by 31.58% and 16.67%, respectively, after a 10 min treatment with [Fe.sub.70], and by 36.84% and 17.03%, respectively, after a 20 min treatment with [Fe.sub.70]. The results indicate that the released [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] removed more soluble organic matter from the water samples than liquid chlorine. Thus, treatment with sustainedrelease [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] may improve the quality of purified drinking water.

4. Conclusions

In this study, a novel encapsulation method using hypochlorite oxidation to prepare sustained-release [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] was presented. The Fe(VI) release experiments demonstrated that diatomite as an encapsulation material affords the slow release of [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] into solution, which greatly increases the contact probability between released [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] and pollutants. The optimal mass fraction of [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4] in the sustained-release [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4], among those tested, was found to be 70%. A maximum methyl orange removal rate of 64.86% was achieved with 0.3 g/L [Fe.sub.70] and a reaction time of 20 min, for an initial methyl orange concentration of 20 mg/L. With an [Fe.sub.70] dosage of 0.06 g/L and reaction time of 20 min, 36.84% of soluble microbial products and 17.03% of simple aromatic protein were removed from natural water samples.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


Financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 51108483), the Natural Science Foundation Project of CQ CSTC (no. cstcjjA20002), the 111 Project (no. B13041), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (no. 106112013CDJZR210002) is gratefully acknowledged.


[1] R. K. Murmann and P. R. Robinson, "Experiments utilizing Fe[O.sub.4.sup.2-] for purifying water," Water Research, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 543-547,1974.

[2] K. S. Kim, Y. K. Chang, S. K. Bae, and C. S. Hahn, "Selective oxidation of allylic and benzylic alcohols using potassium ferrate under phase-transfer catalysis condition," Synthesis, vol. 10, pp. 866-868, 1984.

[3] V. K. Sharma, "Potassium ferrate(VI): an environmentally friendly oxidant," Advances in Environmental Research, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 143-156, 2002.

[4] J.-Q. Jiang and B. Lloyd, "Progress in the development and use of ferrate(VI) salt as an oxidant and coagulant for water and wastewater treatment," Water Research, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1397-1408, 2002.

[5] Q. Han and W. Y. Dong, "Progress in development of potassium ferrate as new, highly efficient water treatment agent," Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 200-205,2012 (Chinese).

[6] J. S. Mattice and H. E. Zittel, "Site specific evaluation of powerplant chlorination," Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 2284-2308, 1976.

[7] M. J. Nieuwenhuijsen, M. B. Toledano, N. E. Eaton, J. Fawell, and P. Elliott, "Chlorination disinfection byproducts in water and their association with adverse reproductive outcomes: a review," Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 7385, 2000.

[8] J.-Q. Jiang, S. Wang, and A. Panagoulopoulos, "The exploration of potassium ferrate(VI) as a disinfectant/coagulant in water and wastewater treatment," Chemosphere, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 212-219, 2006.

[9] L. Delaude and P. Laszlo, "A novel oxidizing reagent based on potassium ferrate[(VI).sup.1]," The Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 61, no. 18, pp. 6360-6370, 1996.

[10] J. H. Qu, S. Lin, and L. L. Wang, "Aquatic stability of ferrate and its application in water treatment," Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, vol. 21, pp. 106-109, 2001 (Chinese).

[11] W. F. Wagner, J. R. Gump, and E. N. Hart, "Factors affecting the stability of aqueous potassium ferrate(VI) solutions," Analytical Chemistry, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1497-1498, 1952.

[12] H. J. Hrostowski and A. B. Scott, "The magnetic susceptibility of potassium ferrate," The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 105-107, 1950.

[13] J. F. Lemonas, "Diatomite," American Ceramic Society Bulletin, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 92-95, 1997 (Chinese).

[14] L. Yu, J. Xi, H. T. Chan, T Su, D. L. Phillips, and W. K. Chan, "The degradation mechanism of methyl orange under photocatalysis of TiO2," Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 3589-3595, 2012.

[15] W. He, J. Wang, H. Shao, J. Zhang, and C.-N. Cao, "Novel KOH electrolyte for one-step electrochemical synthesis of high purity solid [K.sub.2]Fe[O.sub.4]: comparison with NaOH," Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 607-611, 2005.

[16] Z. Xu, J. Wang, H. Shao, Z. Tang, and J. Zhang, "Preliminary investigation on the physicochemical properties of calcium ferrate(VI)," Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 371-377, 2007.

[17] Y. Han, X. J. Zhou, D. C. Peng, and X. C. Wang, "Effect of chlorination disinfection on three dimension fluorescence characteristic of DOM in secondary effluent," Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 2226-2230, 2012 (Chinese).

Xuan Xu, (1,2) Wei Wei, (1) Ping Tao, (1) and Yan Zhang (1)

(1) Key Laboratory of Three Gorges Reservoir Region's Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China

(2) National Centre for International Research of Low-carbon and Green Buildings, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Xuan Xu;

Received 30 December 2013; Revised 19 April 2014; Accepted 25 April 2014; Published 19 May 2014

Academic Editor: Yalei Zhang

FIGURE 5: Removal rate of methyl orange using different treatments.
(Experimental conditions: methyl orange concentration = 20mg/L,
solution volume = 500 mL, and reaction time = 20 min.)

0.100 g potassium ferrate
0.043 g diatomite
0.100 g potassium ferrate
+ 0.043 g diatomite
0.125g [Fe.sub.80]
0.167g [Fe.sub.60]
0.143g [Fe7.sub.0]
COPYRIGHT 2014 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2014 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Xu, Xuan; Wei, Wei; Tao, Ping; Zhang, Yan
Publication:Journal of Chemistry
Article Type:Report
Date:Jan 1, 2014
Previous Article:Allelic variation of wheat flour allergens in a collection of wheat genotypes.
Next Article:A comparative study of the effect of MgO and CaC[O.sub.3] as support materials in the synthesis of carbon nanotubes with Fe/Co as catalyst.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |