Printer Friendly

Prenuptial agreement saves millions; The law adopts a strict policy of requiring the demonstration of something unfair before it will open the Pandora's Box of litigation where there has been an agreement of this nature.

Byline: Karen Moores Partner and head of family law, Sydney Mitchell LLP

S | T Valentine's Day is a popular date for marriage proposals and so it may be a good point early in the year to consider the current position in relation to prenuptial agreements.

Following recent reports that prenuptial agreements are soon to be given legislative support, comes a case in which the current attitude of the courts towards prenuptial agreements has been made clearer.

It involved a wealthy couple who entered into a prenuptial agreement just before they married. The marriage proved short-lived, lasting around 15 months. The husband had assets in excess of PS13 million and an income of nearly PS400,000 per annum net of tax. The wife had a net worth of almost nil. Under the prenuptial agreement, the wife was entitled to an income of PS8,000 per month plus PS3,000 per annum per child.

The pre-nuptial was entered into with the benefit of legal advice on both sides and was signed by the wife, despite the presence on the agreement of a prominent warning that it should not be signed unless the signatory intended to be bound by its terms.

Despite this, in divorce proceedings, the wife sought an order that she should not be bound to the pre-nuptial agreement and claimed that she should receive the full range of 'financial remedies' available on divorce.

The court rejected her claim, Judge Mostyn stating that 'the law adopts a strict policy of requiring the demonstration of something unfair before it will open the Pandora's Box of litigation where there has been an agreement of this nature'.

This seems a clear indication that the courts will up-hold Prenuptial agreements, although of course each case is dealt with on its own particular facts.

Although this case involved a wealthy couple, pre-nuptial agreements are not limited to only those with wealth. Whatever, your balance sheet, a pre-nuptial agreement provides reassurance as to what will happen in the event of a divorce.

CAPTION(S):

Karen Moores, partner and head of family law, Sydney Mitchell LLP

COPYRIGHT 2015 Birmingham Post & Mail Ltd
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:The Birmingham Post (England)
Date:Jan 22, 2015
Words:348
Previous Article:1 Lord Bamford PS3.3 billion. Manufacturing[...].
Next Article:Seeing the wood for the trees.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters