Printer Friendly

Predictive Value of NT-proBNP in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.

To the Editor:

We read with interest the recent article by Suzuki et al. concerning the measurement of trimethylamine A-oxide (TMAO) [1] and risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (1). In their study of 1079 AMI patients, these authors analyzed the associations of TMAO with all-cause mortality or reinfarction in comparison with other biomarkers [including N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptides (NT-proBNP)]. They found that TMAO concentrations were strongly associated with adverse outcome at 2 years, showing a predictive power superior to all other biomarkers. A particularly surprising finding of this study was the lack of an association between NT-proBNP concentrations and prognosis in any models tested by Cox proportional hazards survival analyses. Many other studies (2-4), including the very recent Clopidogrel as Adjunctive Reperfusion Therapy--Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 28 (CLARITY-TIMI 28) study (5), have demonstrated BNP or NTproBNP measurements to be a strong predictor of adverse outcome in patients with AMI. Some pathophysiological and methodological issues need to be considered to explain these conflicting results regarding the predictive value of NT-proBNP.

Plasma BNP/NT-proBNP concentrations increase immediately after AMI, the extent of the increase being related to infarct size (2, 3). Patients with smaller infarcts tend to have a monophasic increase in BNP/NT-proBNP, peaking within 24 h after the onset of symptoms. Heeschen et al. (4) reported that in patients with high baseline NT-proBNP, the absence of a rapid decline in NT-proBNP ([less than or equal to]250 ng/L) after myocardial injury was linked to an adverse short-term prognosis. Furthermore, in patients with low NT-proBNP at baseline, a rise in NT-proBNP [greater than or equal to]250 ng/L at 72 h after myocardial injury was also linked to 30-day adverse prognosis (4). In addition, a strong relation has been documented between plasma concentrations of BNP and NT-proBNP usually measured at hospital admission, and long-term, all-cause mortality, as well as rate of readmissions for heart failure after MI (2, 3). Finally, studies of serial measurements of NT-proBNP following admission for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes have shown that persistently increased peptide concentrations are associated with the presence of refractory ischemia and high risk of short-term recurrent ischemic events (5). According to these data, the timing of plasma sampling for NT-proBNP assay needs to be reported explicitly in clinical studies for accurate risk stratification in AMI patients. Unfortunately, in the article by Suzuki et al. (1) only the time of sampling for TMAO assay [i.e., mean 3.5 (SD 1.1) days after admission] was reported, whereas the time of NT-proBNP sampling was not specified. Another important limitation of this study regards the characteristics of the cohort of AMI patients, which included a high proportion of patients with ST-elevation MI (STEMI) and low revascularization rate, making the results of this study difficult to compare with those of studies that have included patients with ACSNSTEMI (acute coronary syndrome non-STEMI) (4).

Analytical aspects may also play a role in explaining the conflicting results regarding prognostic accuracy of NT-proBNP concentrations. An inhouse method for NT-proBNP assay was used in the study of Suzuki et al., whereas the ECLIA (electrochemiluminescence immunoassay) using Elecsys and Cobas automated platforms (Roche Diagnostics), has been the most commonly used method in clinical laboratories. Another potential cause of the conflicting results may be the possible degradation of the peptide in plasma samples stored at -80[degrees]C for several years (1).

In conclusion, we believe that results reported by Suzuki et al. (1) regarding the prognostic value of NT-proBNP in patients with AMI are difficult to evaluate in comparison with other studies reported in the literature owing to the methodological limitations we have outlined here.

Authors' Disclosures or Potential Conflicts of Interest: No authors declared any potential conflicts of interest.

References

(1.) Suzuki T, Heaney LM, Jones DJL, Ng LL. Trimethylamine N-oxide and risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction. Clin Chem 2017;63:420-8.

(2.) Omland T. Clinical and laboratory diagnostics of cardiovascular disease: focus on natriuretic peptides and cardiac ischemia. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2005; 65(Suppl 240):18-24.

(3.) Peacock WF. Time to treatment and acute coronary syndromes: bridging the gap in rapid decision making. Rev Cradiovasc Med 2010;11(Suppl 2):S45-S50.

(4.) Heeschen C, Hamm CW, Mitrovic V, Lantelme NH, White HD. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels for dynamic risk stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2004;110:3206-12.

(5.) O'Donoghue ML, Morrow DA, Cannon CP, Jarolim P, Desai NR, Sherwood MW, et al. Multimarker risk stratification in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Heart Assoc 2016;5:e002586.

Aldo Clerico [2] *

Claudio Passino [2]

[2] Fondazione Regione Toscana G. Monasterio and Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna Pisa, Italy

* Address correspondence to this author at:

Fondazione CNR Regione Toscana G. Monasterio and Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna

via Moruzzi 1

56126 Pisa, PI, Italy

Fax 0585493652

E-mail clerico@ftgm.it

Previously published online at DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.269522

[1] Nonstandard abbreviations: TMAO, trimethylamine Noxide; MI, myocardial infarction; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide.
COPYRIGHT 2017 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Clerico, Aldo; Passino, Claudio
Publication:Clinical Chemistry
Article Type:Letter to the editor
Date:May 1, 2017
Words:831
Previous Article:Total Analytic Error for Low Cardiac Troponin Concentrations ([less than or equal to]10 ng/L) by Use of a High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Assay.
Next Article:In Reply.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters