Printer Friendly

Predictions of things to come for 1031 exchanges.

Around the end of most years I write a column predicting what you are likely to see in the 1031 arena over the following 12 months. I recently spent an afternoon in a meeting with one of the people responsible for Section 1031 of the tax code for the IRS. Based on that meeting, what follows are my predictions of changes to look for during the next year.

Tightening of the requirements for qualified intermediaries--The IRS knows that they have problems with what they call "Accommodating Accommodators." These people are qualified intermediaries (QI) who are pretty loose with the requirements of a 1031 exchange. The problems range from these QIs regularly allowing clients to do 1031 exchanges on fix-and-flips, to their allowing clients to change their identification letter after the 45th day. The IRS knows they are out there, but it is not always easy for them to tell who these intermediaries are.

The IRS has been trying to figure out how best to deal with the problems during the last few years and now they have a plan. Intermediaries will be assigned a registration number similar to what tax shelter promoters must have. The IRS will use this number to track the exchanges each intermediary performs. This new procedure will require the revision of several IRS forms. You'll probably see a change to Form 1099-S but perhaps not until 2006. This form is used to report the sale of your Old Property. I expect that they will develop a new form for the reporting of sales subject to an exchange. Don't be surprised if they require that the intermediary's registration number be shown on the 1099-S along with some basic information like the date of closing and the dollar amount of proceeds sent to the intermediary.

1031 Exchanges affecting Farmers--Congress and the IRS have been getting a lot of complaints lately about a sharp increase in the price of farmland. Apparently farmers blame a lot of this increase on 1031 exchanges. These higher prices have increased the entry-level requirements for new farmers, and these farmers are voicing their frustrations to their elected representatives. Farmers have a lot of political clout in this country; so I wouldn't be surprised if we see some federal legislation come out of this.

Changes affecting TICs--The last major change I see coming in the next year is some type of ruling or legislation designed to curb the rising occurrence of investments in Tenancy-in-Common (TIC). TICs are syndicated investment programs designed to attract investors into real estate projects--typically large projects.

Perhaps curb is too strong a word. But they will most likely do something. The TIC ruling that was written in 2002 (IRS Revenue Procedure 2002-22) was a listing of the minimum criteria that the IRS wanted to see before they would agree to rule on whether the project was approved as replacement property for an exchange. Estimates from the TIC industry are that the equity (or cash) portion of these purchases during 2005 will approximate $8 billion. If you assume that the average project involves 50% debt, the amount of real estate purchased during 2005 will approximate $16 billion. This is a huge increase from about $6 billion last year.

This expected increase of almost 300% this year is what has the IRS concerned. If you take 2004 and 2005 together, $22 billion is a lot of property, and at the industry estimate of $500,000 per investor, this is a lot of 1031 exchanges that are buying TICs as replacement property. So how many of these projects have actually applied for approval by the IRS? Two! And this is what has the IRS concerned--they suspect (and rightfully so) that many of these deals will not qualify as 1031 replacement property if they were audited.

The SEC is also concerned because they believe about half of the projects that were sold this year were sold by people who were not authorized to sell securities, people such as real estate agents who believe that what they are selling is real estate, not a security.

And just so that no one is left out, Congress is also concerned because they are getting angry calls from Real Estate Investment Trusts (REIT) that are complaining that they can't buy any properties because the TICs are outbidding them. So, watch for some type of change to come in this area.

Gary Gorman is a retired CPA and author of the 1031 book Exchanging Up!
COPYRIGHT 2005 Hagedorn Publication
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:INSIDERS OUTLOOK
Author:Gorman, Gary
Publication:Real Estate Weekly
Article Type:Column
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Dec 28, 2005
Words:745
Previous Article:Ardigo aids New Orleans.
Next Article:Make sure you understand Local Law 26 compliance.
Topics:


Related Articles
Consider a section 1031 exchange.
How do intermediaries affect related-party exchanges?
Like-kind home exchanges: IRS allows both exclusion and deferral of gains.
CPAs: an untapped resource for real estate investments.
CPAs building financial services practices: firms of all sizes are successfully balancing client interests and pressure for new revenue.
Commonly asked investor question about 1031--Part 1.
Title firm gets into the business 1031 exchanges.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters