Printer Friendly

Potential carbon sequestration in rubber tree plantations in the northwestern region of the Parana State, Brazil/Potencial de sequestro de carbono em seringais no noroeste do Parana, Brasil.

Introduction

The state of Parana, is the southernmost state in Brazil where the climatic characteristics are adequate to support the growth of rubber tree plantations (CAMARGO et al., 2003). By the year 2000, more than 1000 ha of rubber trees were established and productive in Parana (PEREIRA et al., 2000). The establishment of rubber tree plantations has been proposed as an option to improve physical and chemical soil properties by protecting the soil from erosion and recycling nutrients through leaf litterfall (PEREIRA et al., 2000). These plantations, as a monoculture or combined with other crops in agroforestry systems, may also sequester carbon from the atmosphere (DEY, 2005; YANG et al., 2005; GUO et al., 2006).

Plant biomass estimates in rubber tree plantations of different ages and grown in potentially dissimilar conditions in southern Brazil (CUNHA et al., 2000; COTTA et al., 2006; WAUTERS et al., 2008) and Asia (DEY, 2005; YANG et al., 2005) have revealed a large range of carbon accumulation rates, from 1.4 to 6.7 Mg C [ha.sup.-1] [yr.sup.-1]. However, fewer studies have investigated changes in the soil carbon accumulation rates beneath rubber tree plantations. For example, when compared to adjacent agricultural areas, an accumulation rate of 0.72 Mg C [ha.sup.-1] [yr.sup.-1] was reported to a depth of 1 m in China (YANG et al., 2005).

Carbon isotopic ratio measurements have been used to gain information regarding changes in soil carbon associated with land use. Because the photosynthetic process discriminates against [sup.13]C differently in C3 and C4 plants (FRY, 2006), the [delta][sup.13]C of the soil organic matter can be used to reflect the long-term source of plant material, and this measure can be used to quantify carbon addition to the soil from the vegetation.

The present study addresses the question of how much carbon can be sequestered by a rubber tree plantation by performing the following two analyses: biomass measurements in rubber tree stands of different ages in adjacent areas to estimate the biomass accumulation rate and soil carbon and isotopic carbon determination in soils to study the carbon storage change that is associated with the conversion from a pasture to a rubber tree plantation.

Material and methods Study Site

The study site is located at Fazenda Guanabara in Paranapoema (22[degrees]43'S, 57[degrees]07'W) in the northwestern region of the Parana state of Brazil. The location is 400 m above sea level, and the climate is classified as humid subtropical (Cfa according to the Koppen classification, LUTGENS; TARBUCK, 2004); the average annual temperature is 22[degrees]C, and the total annual precipitation is 1500 mm. The soil at this site was classified as Oxisol according to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Taxonomy (Latossolo Vermelho in the Brazilian Soil Classification System). The soil has a loamy sand texture (85% sand, 1% silt and 14% clay) and a pH (Ca[Cl.sub.2]) of 4.0 at a 0-20 cm depth.

Historically, this area was occupied by a seasonal semideciduous forest and contained a large diversity of species, which were predominantly classified in the Caesalpiniaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Myrtaceae and Fabaceae families (SOUZA; BATISTA, 2004). In 1950, the forest was cleared and planted with coffee (Coffea arabica). In July 1975, when a severe frost killed all of the coffee plants, the area was planted with pasture grass (Brachiaria-Urochloa brizantha) to support extensive cattle grazing. In 1988, 1997 and 1999, nearby areas within the pasture were planted with rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis) in plots that ranged in size from 125 to 250 ha. The study area was planted with the clone PB235 at a density of 500 plants [ha.sup.-1]; in-row trees were spaced at 2.5 m, and the rows were spaced 8 m apart. At the time of sampling, the trees were 4, 6 and 15 years old. Only the oldest stand was being tapped.

Rubber tree biomass sampling and analysis

The quantification of the above- and belowground tree biomass values was completed in February 2003 for each of the three plantations. The diameter at the breast height (dbh) of 80 trees was measured in each stand. Four trees in each area, which were representative of the stand's mean dbh (8.3, 12.5, and 21.9 cm for the 4-, 6- and 15-year-old trees, respectively) were selected for destructive sampling. After felling each tree, the aboveground biomass was separated into leaves, large branches (> 4 cm diameter), small branches (< 4 cm diameter), dry branches, and tree trunks. The belowground biomass was measured by excavating areas of 1, 4 and 6.25 [m.sup.2] around each tree stump for the 4-, 6- and 15-year-old trees, respectively, to a depth of 1 m. The roots were separated from the loosened soil by hand picking and sieving. The taproot was removed from the soil using a tractor equipped with a front-end loader. The belowground biomass was separated into the root stump, primary roots, lateral roots and loose roots.

The fresh weight of each component of the above- and belowground tree biomass was determined in the field. For the tree trunk and large branches, sub-samples were taken from the lower, mid and upper one-third regions. Sub-samples (500 g fresh weight) of each component were taken and used for further laboratory analyses. The plant samples were dried at 60[degrees]C until they reached a constant weight, and the fresh biomass water content was determined. The plant material was ground in a Wiley Mill (passed through a 1 mm screen). The total carbon content was determined using the Walkley-Black method. The samples of the plant components were also analyzed using the dry combustion method to calibrate the wet digestion method. The [delta][sup.13]C of the plant samples was determined using a Tracemass Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometer (Europa Scientific, Crewe, UK) at the Isotope Analytical Laboratory, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada. In the results section, the means of four samples and the standard errors are presented.

Soil sampling and soil carbon determination

Soil samples for organic carbon determination were taken in April 2003 from the 4- and 15-year-old plantations; they were taken in the area at two positions which were located 2 and 4 m from the tree row. By using an auger, the soil samples were obtained from each sampling position at 0-10, 10-20, 20-40 and 40-60 cm depths from four locations within the area of each plantation (2 positions x 4 layers x 4 tree areas = 32 samples per plantation age). Soils samples were also collected from the adjacent pasture field at 4 locations at the same 4 depths (16 total samples). This area was assumed to represent the original pasture in which the rubber tree plantation was established. In other words, the pasture carbon levels at the time of sampling in 2003 were assumed to have remained unchanged since the rubber tree plantations were established in 1988, 1997, and 1999. Therefore, a comparison of the carbon content in the samples could provide an estimate of the amount of carbon that had accumulated in the soil since the conversion from pasture to rubber tree.

A 500 g sub-sample of the field moist soil was collected using a coning and quartering technique. In the laboratory, these samples were air-dried and passed through a 4 mm sieve to remove the coarse mineral fraction and large plant residue fragments. A sub-sample (25 g) was oven dried at 105[degrees]C for 48h for further analysis. The soil was finely ground to < 0.150 mm and analyzed to determine the organic carbon content and [delta][sup.13]C at the Centre of Nuclear Energy in Agriculture at the University of Sao Paulo (CENA/USP) in Piracicaba, Brazil. The total soil organic carbon content was calculated assuming a soil bulk density of 1.55 Mg [m.sup.-3] (CUNHA et al., 1999).

The vegetation shift from a Brachiaria-Urochloa-dominated pasture, which is a C4 plant, to a rubber tree plantation, which is a C3 plant, allowed the use of [delta][sup.13]C techniques to measure the amounts of soil organic carbon that were derived from these two sources at each plantation (the 4-and 15-year-old trees). A simple two-pool mixing model was used for the calculation, and it was based on the soil and plant [delta][sup.13]C and total soil carbon data (BERNOUX et al., 1998) as follows:

[C.sub.t][[delta].sub.t] = [C.sub.C3][[delta].sub.C3] + [C.sub.C4][[delta].sub.C4] (1)

where:

[C.sub.t] is the total soil organic carbon;

[C.sub.C3] and [C.sub.C4] are the amounts of carbon derived from the rubber tree and pasture grass vegetation, respectively;

[[delta].sub.t] is the [delta][sup.13]C of the soil organic carbon;

[[delta].sub.C3] and [[delta].sub.C4] are the [delta][sup.13]C of the C3 or C4 vegetation, respectively.

For these calculations, the average of the measured [delta][sup.13]C for the components of the rubber tree biomass ([[delta].sub.C3] = -25.91[per thousand] + 1.16) and the data regarding the [delta][sup.13]C of the pasture (SC4 = -14.3[per thousand] + 0.56 for Brachiaria-Urochloa, according to MORAES et al., 1996) were used as reported in the literature.

The means and standard errors of all of the samples at each depth (8 samples per depth) or from 4 samples per depth (when the results were divided according to the distance from the tree rows) are presented and were used to estimate the total carbon in the soil and the [delta][sup.13]C results.

Results and discussion

Rubber tree biomass and carbon stocks

The sum of the trunk and branch biomass values accounted for the majority of the biomass at all of the ages; it increased from 66% of the total biomass at the 4-year-old plantations to 71 and 81% at the 6- and 15-year-old plantations, respectively (Table 1). This increase was mostly attributed to an increase in branches biomass rather than in trunk biomass. The biomass accumulation rate of the combination of branches and trunk corresponded to 74% of the total accumulation rate from 4 to 6 years of age (22.4 kg [plant.sup.-1] [yr.sup.-1]) and 85% from 6 to 15 years of age (24.9 kg [plant.sup.-1] [yr.sup.-1]). The root biomass accumulation rate decreased from 17 to 11% of the total for the same age intervals.

The carbon content in the biomass ranged from 402.3 [+ or -] 10.61 g C [kg.sup.-1] (small branches, 4-year-old plants) to 450.6 [+ or -] 1.88 g C [kg.sup.-1] (primary roots, 4-year-old plants). As expected, the amount of carbon in the biomass of the older plantations was relatively higher than of the younger plantations; the carbon level increased from 77% for the 4-year-old plantation to 81 and 85% for 6- and 15-year-old trees, respectively. During the first four years, the carbon accumulation rate was 2.51 kg C [plant.sup.-1] [yr.sup.-1]. This rate increased to 9.58 kg C [plant.sup.-1] [yr.sup.-1] from 4 to 6 years old plants and to 10.64 kg C [plant.sup.-1] [yr.sup.-1] from 6 to 15 years old plants (Table 1).

It is a complex task to compare measured biomass production and carbon content with previously published values. Various methods are used to estimate biomass, such as destructive sampling, allometric equations, and geographic information systems; the use of these methods produces results that are expressed in different units (MAGCALE-MACANDOG, 2004). Additionally, the plantation clone, age, soil type, climate conditions and management are important factors that influence tree growth and carbon accumulation (WAUTERS et al., 2008). A summary of some of the published values of total biomass and carbon accumulation rate for the rubber tree is presented in Table 2. These data were derived from different regions of the world and show a large range of results.

Cunha et al. (2000) reported that a 12-year-old rubber tree plantation located in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil had a total biomass of 349.53 kg [plant.sup.-1]. This value is approximately 20% higher than the individual plant biomass that was measured in the current study for a plantation 3 years younger than the oldest plantation in the current study. In the state of Bahia, Cotta et al. (2006) evaluated a 34-year-old rubber tree plantation associated with cocoa trees and calculated a total rubber tree biomass of approximately 170 Mg [ha.sup.-1]. Low-temperature stress, which occurs during the winter in the northwestern region of the Parana state, is likely a key explanation for the lower biomass accumulation rates that were measured when compared to other studies that have been performed in regions of Brazil, in which low temperatures occur less frequently.

Because the average biomass accumulation rate varies with age, it is critical that comparisons are made between plantations of the same age. The accumulation rates that were calculated for 6-year-old plantations in India (DEY, 2005) and China (YANG et al., 2005) ranged from 4.1 to 7.4 Mg [ha.sup.-1] [yr.sup.-1], while we observed a biomass accumulation rate of 5.7 Mg [ha.sup.-1] [yr.sup.-1] in the present study. Although there is a large variation between the total biomass stock in plants, the proportion of aboveground biomass did not vary to the same extent; it ranged from 70 to 85%. It is also apparent that this proportion increased with age, as observed in this study and by Dey (2005).

Historically, studies have utilized different methods to estimate carbon biomass, using a fixed value of 0.5 kg C [kg.sup.-1] (COTTA et al., 2006, YANG et al., 2005) or measurements (DEY, 2005; WAUTERS et al., 2008), according to Table 2. When comparing plantations of similar ages, the carbon accumulation rates that were determined in the present study were within the range that has been presented in the literature (DEY, 2005, YANG et al., 2005; WAUTERS et al., 2008).

Soil Carbon Dynamics

The position of the soil sample with respect to the rubber tree row and plantation age affected the total soil organic carbon (SOC). Samples that were taken at greater distances from the trees (4 m from the planting row) had lower SOC levels than samples that were taken at a distance of 2 m, and the oldest plantation had the highest SOC (Table 3). The SOC content in the layer that was within the top 20 cm was significantly higher (p < 0.07) in the 15-year-old rubber tree plantation, averaging 15.6 [+ or -] 0.97 Mg C [ha.sup.-1], compared to the 4-year-old plantation and the pasture, which had means of 11.4 [+ or -] 0.83 and 10.7 [+ or -] 0.92 Mg C [ha.sup.-1], respectively (Figure 1a). However, at the greatest sampled depth, the SOC was similar between all of the sites, ranging from 19.4 [+ or -] 1.06 to 21.0 [+ or -] 0.68 Mg C [ha.sup.-1]. The intermediate layer (20 to 40 cm) showed large variability in SOC for all of the sampled sites. The total carbon stock in the top 60 cm of the soil was 63.4 Mg C [ha.sup.-1] for the pasture and 66.8 and 79.3 Mg C [ha.sup.-1] for the 4- and 15-year-old rubber tree plantations, respectively. The differences in observed SOC for the two positions with respect to the tree rows were also present in [delta][sup.13]C; the lowest [delta][sup.13]C values were found at 2 m in the 15-year-old plantation (Figure 1b).

The carbon content in the top soil layer increased as the land transitioned from pasture to young and then to old rubber tree plantations (Figure 1a). The greater SOC in the rubber tree plantations compared to the pasture is likely caused by the greater inputs of organic material in the tree-based system. As a semi-deciduous crop, the rubber tree adds organic matter to the soil surface every year through litter deposition during the wintering period. Because wintering effects usually begin when trees are 4 to 5 years old (GEETHA; JACOB, 2003), the SOC increase through leaf litter deposition becomes more significant as the rubber trees age. The increase in SOC is also observed to a great depth due to the older plantation's well-developed root systems. The larger biomass accumulation rate in the 15-year-old plantation when compared to the 4-year-old plantation corresponded to the higher SOC increase. The growth of the rubber tree from 4- to 15 years old resulted in an SOC carbon sequestration rate of 1.1 Mg C [ha.sup.-1] [yr.sup.-1] to a 60 cm depth. This rate is approximately 20% of the accumulation rate that was observed in the biomass during the same period (5.2 Mg C [ha.sup.-1] [yr.sup.-1]). When combined with the plant belowground accumulation rate (the roots), this rate increases to 1.9 Mg C [ha.sup.-1] [yr.sup.-1].

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

An increase in SOC was also observed by Yang et al. (2005), who determined that the annual SOC increase in Chinese rubber tree plantations that were established on formerly arable land was 0.72 Mg C [ha.sup.-1] [yr.sup.-1] to a 100 cm depth. However, Araujo et al. (2004) found no significant differences between the SOC values in areas managed as pasture (9.1 g C [kg.sup.-1]) or rubber tree plantations (8.8 g C [kg.sup.-1]) after approximately 25 years had elapsed since the conversion of the natural forest.

Over the course of fifteen years, the switch from pasture to rubber tree plantation resulted in a significant increase in the proportion of SOC derived from rubber tree vegetation in the 0-60 cm layer. Using equation [1], the SOC in the pasture, which is considered here as being equivalent to the SOC at the time of rubber tree planting, was estimated to contain 48% Brachiaria-Urochloa-derived carbon (C4), while 52% was derived from the earlier C3 vegetation (i.e., coffee and native forest) (Figure 2). As the rubber trees became established, carbon from the leaves and roots was added to the soil, which increased the contribution of the C3-derived SOC to 57 and 82% for the 4- and 15-year-old plantations, respectively. The contribution of C4 vegetation to SOC in the pasture varied from 70% in the 0-10 cm layer to 30% in the deepest layer sampled; these results reflect the addition of Brachiaria-Urochloa-derived carbon to the surface soil layers (data not shown). After 15 years of rubber tree growth, all of the soil layers demonstrated increased levels of C3-derived carbon, ranging from 75 to 86%.

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

The [delta][sup.13]C values measured in the current study were within their typical range for C3- or C4- derived SOC values. The site history indicates that the vegetation was predominantly composed of C3 plants, in forest or coffee plantations, until 1975. The introduction of pasture caused a shift to [delta][sup.13]C values that are typical of C4 plants, and this shift occurred mainly in the 0-20 cm layer (Figure 1b--pasture). Following the introduction of rubber trees, a new shift in the soil [delta][sup.13]C was observed to a depth of 30 cm for the 4-year-old plantation and down to 60 cm for the 15-year-old plantation. This shift reflects the greater input of residues from C3 plants, such as that derived from tree litterfall and fine root turnover, in the rubber tree plantations.

The shift in the soil [delta][sup.13]C signature 4 years after the rubber trees were established indicates relatively rapid organic carbon dynamics. Similar changes were observed by Martin et al. (1990) in a study that showed losses of C4-derived carbon in the soil in an area in which savanna vegetation (C4) was slowly replaced by woody vegetation, which was composed primarily of C3 plants. The maximum changes in [delta][sup.13]C occurred in the surface soil layer (0-10 cm), and in 16 years, 53 to 71% of the C4-derived carbon was lost. By studying the soil carbon dynamic at 11 different sites, Cerri et al. (2007) evaluated the land use change from forest to pasture and its influence on the SOC [delta][sup.13]C value. They modeled that in the top soil layer, the shift from forest-derived carbon to approximately 50% pasture-derived carbon occurred within 10 to 30 years after the pasture was introduced, and no significant changes in [delta][sup.13]C occurred afterwards.

The present study has demonstrated the great potential of rubber tree plantations for carbon sequestration in a relatively short time period in the northwestern region of the Parana State in Brazil. The study also indicates the significant, untapped potential of rubber trees as a means to sequester carbon in a context of rapidly accelerating climatic change. Furthermore, because the growth of rubber trees occurs primarily in developing nations, it provides the following tangible additional socio-economic benefits: the potential to provide carbon credits to plantation owners, the ability to tap the latex of the rubber trees while the trees are grown, and the possibility to grow additional crops between the rubber tree rows.

Conclusion

The introduction of the rubber tree plantation to a former pasture land resulted in an increase in the soil carbon stock when compared to the pasture, and this increase was attributed to the plantation's root biomass and annual leaf deposition. When comparing plantations of different ages, a biomass accumulation rate that increased over time was observed. The stable isotope technique confirmed that the increased soil carbon was derived from the rubber tree inputs, indicating an increased proportion of C3-derived carbon at the oldest plantation. After 15 years of rubber tree growth, all of the soil layers showed increased levels of C3-derived carbon. This relatively rapid shift from the predominance of C4- to C3-derived carbon is common in tropical regions due to the warm and humid conditions, which lead to a high organic matter decomposition rate.

Doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v36i2.17404

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by IAI--the Inter American Institute for Global Change Research (Project number SGP-007). We thank Dr. Paulo Caramori, Dr. Leocadio Grodzki, Dr. Jomar Pereira, Dr. Andre Ramos from IAC, and Professor Paul Voroney from the U of G, for their contributions in writing this paper; Sandro D. Sanchez and Joao Paulo Castagnolo for their assistance with equipment installation and data collection; and the personnel of Fazenda Guanabara for providing the land, facilities and logistic support.

References

ARAUJO, Q. R.; COMERFORD, N. B.; OGRAM, A. V.; AL-AGELY, A.; SANTOS FILHO, L. P.; SANTOS, J. G. Soil carbon and physical property changes in Brazilian Coastal Tableland soils with land use following deforestation. Agroforestry Systems, v. 63, n. 2, p. 193-198, 2004.

BERNOUX, M.; CERRI, C. C.; NEILL, C.; MORAES, J. F. L. The use of stable carbon isotopes for estimating soil organic matter turnover rates. Geoderma, v. 82, n. 1-3, p. 43-58, 1998.

CAMARGO, A. P.; MARIN, F. R.; CAMARGO, M. B. P. Zoneamento climatico da heveicultura no Brasil. Campinas: Embrapa Monitoramento por Satelite, 2003.

CERRI, E. P. C.; EASTER, M.; PAUSTIAN, K.; KILLIAN, K. ; COLEMAN, K.; BERNOUX, M.; FALLOON, P.; POWLSON, D. S.; BATJES, H.; MILNE, E.; CERRI, C. C. Simulating SOC changes in 11 land use change chronosequences from the Brazilian Amazon with RothC and Century models. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, v. 122, n. 1, p. 46-57, 2007.

COTTA, M. K.; JACOVINE, L. A. G.; VALVERDE, S. R.; PAIVA, H. N.; VIRGENS FILHO, A. C.; SILVA, M. L. Analise economica do consorcio seringueira-cacau para geracao de certificados de emissoes reduzidas. Revista Arvore, v. 30, n. 6, p. 969-979, 2006.

CUNHA, J. E.; CASTRO, S. S.; SALOMAO, F. X. T. Erosive behavior of a pedological system of Umuarama, northwest of Parana. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia do Solo, v. 23, n. 4, p. 943-951, 1999.

CUNHA, T. J. F.; BLANCANEAUX, P.; CALDERANO FILHO, B.; CARMO, C. A. F. S.; GARCIA, N. C. P.; LIMA, E. M. B. Influence of the pedological differentiation on the development of rubber-tree cultivation in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, v. 35, n. 1, p. 145-155, 2000.

DEY, S. K. A preliminary estimation of carbon stock sequestrated through rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) plantation in north eastern region of India. The Indian Forester, v. 131, n. 11, p. 1429-1436, 2005.

FERNANDES, T. J. G.; SOARES, C. P. B.; JACOVINE, L. A. G.; ALVARENGA, A. P. Quantificacao do carbono estocado na parte aerea e raizes de Hevea sp., aos 12 anos de idade, na Zona da Mata mineira. Revista Arvore, v. 31, n. 4, p. 657-665, 2007.

FRANCISCO, V. L. F. S.; BUENO, C. R. F.; BAPTISTELLA, C. S. L. A cultura da seringueira no estado de Sao Paulo. Informacoes Economicas, v. 34, n. 9, p. 31-42, 2004.

FRY, B. Stable isotope ecology. New York: Springer Science + Business Media, 2006.

GEETHA, N.; JACOB, J. Changes in the biochemistry of leaves of tapped and untapped trees of Hevea brasiliensis during refoliation, maturation and wintering. Indian Journal of Natural Rubber Research, v. 16, n. 1/2, p. 85-92, 2003.

GUO, Z.; ZHANG, Y.; DEEGEN, P.; UIBRIG, H. Economic analyses of rubber and tea plantations and rubber-tea intercropping in Hainan, China. Agroforestry Systems, v. 66, n. 2, p. 117-127, 2006.

LUTGENS, F. K.; TARBUCK, E. J. The atmosphere: an introduction to meteorology. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2004.

MAGCALE-MACANDOG, D. B. Comparative evaluation of different approaches to estimate aboveground biomass and biomass density of tropical forests in Southeast Asia: a review. The Philippine Agricultural Scientist, v. 87, n. 1, p. 61-75, 2004.

MARTIN, A.; MARIOTTI, A.; BALESDENT, J.; LAVELLE, P.; VUATTTOUX, R. Estimate of organic matter turnover rate in a savanna soil by [sup.13]C natural abundance measurements. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, v. 22, n. 4, p. 517-523, 1990.

MORAES, J. F. L.; VOLKOFF, B.; CERRI, C. C.; BERNOUX, M. Soil properties under Amazon forest and changes due to pasture installation in Rondonia, Brazil. Geoderma, v. 70, n. 1, p. 63-81, 1996.

PEREIRA, J. P.; DORETTO, M.; LEAL, A. C.; CASTRO, A. M. G.; RUCKER, N. A. Cadeia produtiva da borracha natural: analise diagnostica e demandas atuais no Parana. Londrina: Iapar, 2000.

SOUZA, F. M.; BATISTA, J. L. F. Restoration of seasonal semideciduous forests in Brazil: influence of age and restoration design on forest structure. Forest Ecology and Management, v. 191, n. 1-3, p. 185-200, 2004.

WAUTERS, J. B.; COUDERT, S.; GRALLIEN, E.; JONARD, M.; PONETTE, Q. Carbon stock in rubber tree plantations in Western Ghana and Mato Grosso (Brazil). Forest Ecology and Management, v. 255, n. 7, p. 2347-2361, 2008.

YANG, J. C.; HUANG, J. H.; TANG, J. W.; PAN, Q. M.; HAN, X. G. Carbon sequestration in rubber tree plantations established on former arable lands in Xishuangbanna, SW China. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, v. 29, n. 2, p. 296-303, 2005.

Received on May 30, 2012. Accepted on September 20, 2012.

Selma Regina Maggiotto (1) *, Dalziza de Oliveira (2), Celso Jamil Marur (2), Sonia Maria Soares Stivari (3), Monique Leclerc (4) and Claudia Wagner-Riddle (5)

(1) Universidade de Brasilia, s/n, 70910-900, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil. (2) Instituto Agronomico do Parana, Londrina, Parana, Brazil. (3) Departamento de Fisica, Universidade Estadual de Maringa, Maringa, Parana, Brazil. (4) Laboratory for Environmental Physics, University of Georgia, Athens, United States of Amerca. (5) School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. * Author for correspondence. E-mail: srmaggio@unb.br
Table 1. Rubber tree water content (%), biomass and carbon content
(kg [plant.sup.-1]), above-and belowground, for each age group of
rubber trees in Paranapoema, Brazil.

Variable             Age                     Aboveground
                     (yr)
                            Trunk     Large      Small       Dry
                                     branches   branches   branches

Water content (%)     4      51.2      58.6       58.8        --
                      6      50.1      55.7       55.5        --
                      15     48.0      48.6       52.0       19.3

Biomass (kg           4      9.03      0.97       5.70        --
  [plant.sup.-1])     6     23.06      9.29      16.49        --
                      15    108.85    79.19      39.83      10.08

Carbon content (kg    4      3.78      0.41       2.30        --
  [plant.sup.-1])     6      9.86      3.89       6.81        --
                      15    46.21     33.79      16.64       4.33

Variable             Age                  Belowground
                     (yr)
                            Leaves   Root    Main    Lateral   Loose
                                     stump   roots    roots    roots

Water content (%)     4      66.1    47.8    50.1     45.9     54.3
                      6      65.1    43.1    53.1     47.9     59.0
                      15     67.0    47.1    56.5     55.6     57.9

Biomass (kg           4      2.99    2.32    2.54     0.15     0.14
  [plant.sup.-1])     6      7.17    4.97    6.53     0.60     0.56
                      15    10.19    17.33   22.43    1.45     3.15

Carbon content (kg    4      1.25    1.02    1.15     0.07     0.06
  [plant.sup.-1])     6      3.01    2.20    2.93     0.26     0.24
                      15     4.39    7.77    9.93     0.63     1.33

Variable             Age    Total
                     (yr)

Water content (%)     4       --
                      6       --
                      15      --

Biomass (kg           4     23.84
  [plant.sup.-1])     6     68.67
                      15    292.59

Carbon content (kg    4     10.04
  [plant.sup.-1])     6     29.20
                      15    125.00

Table 2. Total biomass and carbon stock in rubber tree
plantations--data obtained in current study and in the literature.

                                                     Total biomass
                                                   (Mg [ha.sup.-1])

Source                     Location      Age     Aboveground   Roots
                                         (yr)

Current study             Brazil (PR)     4         9.35        2.58
                          Brazil (PR)     6         28.00       6.33
                          Brazil (PR)     15       124.12      22.18

Cunha et al. (2000)       Brazil (BR)   12 (a)     114.4 *     46.4 *
                          Brazil (MG)   12 (b)     56.9 *      13.9 *

Cotta et al. (2006)       Brazil (BA)     34       136.82       32.4

Fernandes et al. (2007)   Brazil (MG)     12        88.67      37.79

Wauters et al. (2008)     Brazil (MT)     14         --          --
                             Ghana        14         --          --

Dey (2005)                   India        6         33.9        14.4
                             India        17        141.1       29.1

Yang et al. (2005)           China        4          --          --
                             China        6          --          --
                             China        16         --          --
                             China        38         --          --

                                                  Total biomass
                                                 (Mg [ha.sup.-1])

Source                     Location      Age          Total
                                         (yr)

Current study             Brazil (PR)     4           11.93
                          Brazil (PR)     6           34.33
                          Brazil (PR)     15          146.30

Cunha et al. (2000)       Brazil (BR)   12 (a)       160.8 *
                          Brazil (MG)   12 (b)        70.8 *

Cotta et al. (2006)       Brazil (BA)     34          169.22

Fernandes et al. (2007)   Brazil (MG)     12          126.46

Wauters et al. (2008)     Brazil (MT)     14            --
                             Ghana        14            --

Dey (2005)                   India        6            44.4
                             India        17          170.2

Yang et al. (2005)           China        4       9.6 ([dagger])
                             China        6      24.5 ([dagger])
                             China        16     132.7 ([dagger])
                             China        38     340.0 ([dagger])

                                                      Carbon
                                                 accumulation rate
                                                 (Mg C [ha.sup.-1]
                                                   [yr.sup.-1])
Source                     Location      Age
                                         (yr)

Current study             Brazil (PR)     4            1.26
                          Brazil (PR)     6            2.43
                          Brazil (PR)     15           4.17

Cunha et al. (2000)       Brazil (BR)   12 (a)
                          Brazil (MG)   12 (b)          --

Cotta et al. (2006)       Brazil (BA)     34           2.49

Fernandes et al. (2007)   Brazil (MG)     12           4.72

Wauters et al. (2008)     Brazil (MT)     14       2.97 ([dagger])
                             Ghana        14       5.45 ([dagger])

Dey (2005)                   India        6            3.58
                             India        17           4.48

Yang et al. (2005)           China        4            1.20
                             China        6            2.05
                             China        16           4.15
                             China        38           4.47

* Assuming the average plant density for State of Sao Paulo, Brazil:
460 trees [ha.sup.-1] (FRANCISCO et al., 2004). ([dagger]) Using
allometric equations.

Table 3. Organic carbon (C) levels in soil sampled at 2 and 4 m
distance from the tree row in 4- and 15-year-old plantations and
from pasture, in Paranapoema, Brazil.

Depth            Rubber tree age / distance from tree row
(m)
          15yr / 2m    15yr / 4m     4yr / 2m     4yr / 4m

         C      SE     C     SE     C     SE     C     SE

g [kg.sup.-1]

-0.05   9.8    0.10   9.4   0.07   8.8   0.09   6.7   0.08
-0.15   11.3   0.11   9.9   0.08   7.6   0.05   6.3   0.03
-0.3    9.8    0.16   7.7   0.06   8.0   0.05   7.1   0.03
-0.5    6.6    0.05   7.0   0.02   6.7   0.03   6.7   0.03

Depth     Pasture
(m)

         C     SE

g [kg.sup.-1]

-0.05   6.5   0.03
-0.15   7.3   0.08
-0.3    7.3   0.06
-0.5    6.3   0.03
COPYRIGHT 2014 Universidade Estadual de Maringa
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2014 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 
Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Maggiotto, Selma Regina; de Oliveira, Dalziza; Marur, Celso Jamil; Stivari, Sonia Maria Soares; Lecl
Publication:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (UEM)
Date:Apr 1, 2014
Words:5419
Previous Article:Adaptability and stability of corn hybrids grown for high grain yield/Adaptabilidade e estabilidade de hibridos de milho em condicoes de alto...
Next Article:Essential oils from Hyptis marrubioides, Aloysia gratissima and Cordia verbenacea reduce the progress of Asian soybean rust/Oleos essenciais de...

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters