Printer Friendly

Potential bio-effects in human health from radio frequency smog.

In India long term exposure due to base-station Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Field (RF-EMF) radiation has been recognized as serious health concern. Research efforts have increased in response to public complaints and in view of the World Health Organization's (WHO) recommendation, the government has announced limitation of frequencies against the base-station installation. Numerous solutions have been given for meeting heterogeneous wireless communication demand. This review discusses the adverse effects of RF-EMF interference Small Cell Base-Stations (SCBS) in hot spot areas in view of biological effects of human health exposure.

The SCBS are established above the ground level and nearby the mobile phone subscribers. Mobile networks are mainly designed to utilize the shortest feasible power from base stations. Therefore, these networks automatically regulate the transmitter power in the base station based on the users distance. The optimal network design is carried out based on the locations of the base stations and users of mobile phone. If the base-stations are situated nearer to the user, then it would produce the low level of EMF, while far away from user, it produces high level EMF. Similarly, when the base stations are situated nearer to the mobile phone users, the transmitter power required by the mobile phone is low and EMF[1] production is relatively low. If base stations are situated far away from the user, then the power required is generally higher, and produces higher EMF [2]. Hence, nearer the base station, lower the EMF and good reception. Several previous studies conducted earlier reported that base stations works at lower power that leads to low interference of RF pollution. Further, the EMF level also low in the base stations which is similar to broadcast television and radio

This paper mainly reviews the evaluation of interference of Radio Frequency (RF) from mobiles base stations and their adverse effect of humans. RF fields emitted by base stations are results severe health problem. Various studies [3] [4] [5] have identified that these RF fields cause carcinogenic to humans. Even though various studies have stated the adverse effect, there is no previous evidence of environmental exposure to RF fields comes from base stations may enhance the cancer risk or any other risk. The radio frequency affected the normal biological cells of the individual by inducing the electromagnetic effects at increase in temperature. These effects are attributed to the induced electromagnetic inside the biological cells of the body which is possibly more harmful. Individuals who are living nearer to the base station or frequently exposed to the emissions of low level wireless antenna have felt various severe symptoms at the time and after its use such as fatigue, dizziness, ringing in the ears, headache, heart palpitation, tingling sensation in the skin of the head, burning, loss of memory, sleep disturbance, lack of concentration, reaction time and disturbance in the digestive system etc. The interference of base station EMW and some medical devices are reducing the risk in newer design of small cell coverage. Since the cellular base stations are successfully extenuating RF signal interference through thoughtful radio system knowledge with proper cell planning, frequency and bandwidth allocation. Thus the heterogeneity in the wireless communication a new technology development of the small cell base station was introduced.

Radiation effects and EMF emissions

Generally, radiation is exhibited by both man-made and natural radiation and they are electromagnetic in nature. In general, there are two categories of electromagnetic radiation which includes the ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. From the research it is evident that the ionizing radiation has a capability to eradicate the electron which is from the atom's orbit of an atom, where it becomes an ionized atom to cause health hazard [8]. For instance, X-rays are perceived as ionized material due to high [22] [26] [27] EMF frequency. However, in the case of non-ionizing radiation it lacks sufficient energy to ionize the atoms. Some of the non-ionisizing radiations are microwave radiation [28] [29] [30] visible light and radio wave frequency (RF) energy.

In the current technological world, the society depends on mobile phones for communications purpose at work, school and home. These mobile phones generate the electromagnetic waves like X-ray and visible light. However, the range of electromagnetic radiation falls between non-ionizing and ionizing ranges of frequency, especially for mobile communication can be in the range of 450-2200 MHz but energy is directly proportional to the wave frequency.

Due to absorption of energy, RF fields ranged from at a lower level of 10 GHz to 1 MHz exposed into tissues and give heating. The penetration depth based on the frequency of the field and is greater for lower frequencies. Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) is the quantity used to measure the absorption of RF energy [10] [6] within a given tissue mass and it is expressed in units of watts per kilogram (W/kg or mW/Kg).) The quantity of RF fields between about 1 MHz and 10 GHz is measured using SAR. People who are exposed to RF fields in the SAR at 4 W/kg, produces several adverse health effects. Similarly, the range at 10 GHz of RF fields are absorbed at the surface of the skin, only few energy enter into the deepen tissues, while the above 10 GHz of RF fields exposed at power densities over 1000 W/[m.sup.2] produces severe health effects like skin burns and eye cataracts. Potential Bio-effects of Exposure to Microwave/ RF Radiation

It deals with the biological entities [7]-] [9] and electromagnetic fields. In the human body, more number of molecules weakly interacts with low frequency bands or EMF in the Radio Frequency (RF). One such interaction is energy absorption from the fields that may cause tissue to high degree of temperature; many intense fields will give higher heating that leads to several biological effects ranging from muscle relaxation (as produced by a diathermy device) to burns. There is a difficulty to prove the electromagnetism direct effects on human health and reported life-threatening interferences from EMF are limited to medical devices such as electronic implants, pacemakers and others.

Generally more biological effects of exposure to RF/microwave radiation are related to heating of tissues which is commonly referred as "thermal effects", mainly due to the RF energy ability to heat biological tissue [11]-[14] . However, the evidence of harmful biological effects is unproven. Non-thermal effects have been proved in animals such as teratogenesis, carcinogenesis etc. but not tested on humans. Some of the biological effects are tested in humans are burns from contact with spectacles, metal implants RF (induction) burns, formation of Cataract (from eye exposure).

The role of long-term revelation to high radio frequency radiation [15]-[17] emitted either from mobile phones or from base stations and its relations with human's hormone profiles. This radiation effects on pituitary-adrenal axis represented in the reduction of ACTH, cortisol, thyroid hormones, prolactin in young females, and testosterone levels.

Pulsed microwave radiation [18]-[20] used in base station of cellular device can non-thermally affect these various biological (electrical) activities and provoke adverse health reactions. Weak radiation can entail only correspondingly weak effects, and vice versa. Even though the non-thermal electromagnetic compatibility between energized electronic equipment used in hospitals and aircraft can be accepted, the human can't accept these radiations. To be more specific it was identified that these radiations cause adverse effect to human brain functioning, especially these affect the electro-chemistry and electrical activities in human body, degrades the immune system and other health reactions [21-[24]. Moreover, these effects were experience by extensive mobile phones user and other who are subjected to long-term radiation exposure from BS.

Furthermore, the studies have identified that [25-[27] that these microwave radiation cause a serious damage to hippocampus region of the brain which results in memory loss related issues and some children had neural problems like epileptic seizures. However, the future study's findings failed to address these issues who adopted the ability of a visible light (such as a stroboscope) flashing technique. In this technique targeted the photosensitive human sampled where every 15-20 times per second the light was flashed which provoked the seizures in the five percentage minimum of epileptics.

Evidence from both animal and human studies on association between exposure and outcome seems to be insufficient and inconsistent [3] This is perhaps due to the methodological challenge involved in distinguishing between exposed RF field from base station and characterize the high and low RF signals in the environment [4]. Despite the fact that few studies of EMF research have identified changes in behavior, cognition and brain wave patterns after exposure to RF fields produced by mobile phones. However, there is lack of convincing evidence about cardiovascular function or altered sleep pattern. Few individuals have felt the non-specific symptoms during the exposure to RF fields produced from EMF devices, and base stations. According to WHO [11] fact sheet report "Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity", the EMF does not cause any symptoms. In spite of that, there is a necessary to understand the individual's difficulty from these symptoms. Overall, there is no convincing evidence associated with RF signals from base station produced adverse health effects. Since wireless networks generally give lower RF signals in comparison with base stations, so that there is no adverse health effects were observed. Base Station mitigation effects on RF

The following are the factors that affect RF interference.

Signal Transmission

During the telephonic communication, the signals from the user's equipment and base station are sent back and forth. The base stations produced by the RF waves are given off into the environment, where people are being exposed to them. Mounting of the Antenna

For various reasons, the individuals are exposed to radio waves from cell phone tower antennas. Some of the reasons are the signals are intermittently transmitted not constantly, the mounted antennas are generally high above the ground level and the power levels are comparatively low.

Distance Factor

A person who is highly exposed to RF levels in nearby cell phone tower. If the cellular antenna is fixed on a roof, it is feasible that the individual who are exposed to RF levels is higher than the ground level.

Reducing exposure level of radiation

Based on the building construction materials, the RF energy level is lower in inside the buildings than the outside. Materials like cement block or wood decreases the RF radiation exposure level by about 10 factors.

Antenna Radiation pattern

The radiation pattern is identified to be hundred to thousand times very low when placed in behind than in front. Hence, if the antenna is placed on the behind the building the exposure is identified to have less radiation.

Energy distribution--Base Station

The network operators have turned out to concentrate more on SCBS, due to the following reasons:

1. Good energy resource, for the growth of wireless communication.

2. This energy consumption of base-stations will give different opportunities for future heterogeneous networks.

3. Radio equipment dominated the energy consumption of a SCBS.

Hence, to reduce the energy consumption of the radio equipment efficiently, it is essential to quantify the energy consumption over the different radio equipment components and to focus on the main consumers.

Energy adaptation opportunities

Normally, base-stations are designed for maximal traffic load and high variations in the power saving parameter. To evaluate the performance of utilizing base station traffic load many parameters were adopted. From the figure, it is illustrated that the variation of BS depends on various aspects like heavy traffic period, medium traffic, heterogeneous interference period and sleep mode period.

Path Loss

Transmission power of base station depends on the strength of a RF field and signal power transmission. Multiple channels with number of channels are existed in base station. The signal transmission will also affect by direction of signal transmission, power and frequency of transmission.

CONCLUSION

The is to concentrate on the human health hazards from radio frequency interference aspects of deploying small cell base station heterogeneous networks. In addition, networks are highly utilizing base stations and small cells situated indoors or below. Several health hazard risks are observed in humans with body-mounted medical electronic devices, implanted defibrillators, or heart pacemakers when they are close and in the main beam of an operating base station antenna. It is assumed that the proposed would reduce the signal transmission; thereby the radio frequency exposure between base station and server is reduced significantly. However, future studies need to be conducted to prove this empirically.

REFERENCES

(1.) Gavan, J. and Tapuchi, S. 'Mitigation techniques for enhancing mobile radio EMC performances', In 2011 XXXth URSI General Assembly and Scientific Symposium. IEEE, (2011); pp. 1-4.

(2.) Hyland, G. J. Potential Adverse Health Impacts of Mobile Technology, Memorandum, Department of physics, University of Warwick and International Institute of Biophysics (2000).

(3.) Luiis, G. N., Newry, R. J., King, B. V and John, A. R. 'Mobile phone radiation induces reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human spermatozoa in vitro PLoS One, 2009; 4(7): pp. 6440-6.

(4.) Mousa, A. 'Electromagnetic Radiation Measurements and Safety Issues of some Cellular Base Stations in Nablus', Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, 2011; 4(1), pp. 35-42. Available at: http:// www.jestr.org/downloads/volume4/fulltext072011.pdf [Accessed November 27, 2014]

(5.) psrast.org, Physicians and Scientists for Responsible Application of science and Technology, "Mobile phones-safety Problems" 2004, Available at: www.psrast.org [Accessed November 27, 2014]

(6.) Roosli, M. and Hug, K. 'Wireless communication fields and non-specific symptoms of ill health: a literature review', Wien Med Wochenschr, 2011; no. 9-10, pp. 240-50.

(7.) Roosli, M., Frei, P., Mohler. E. and Hug, K. 'Systematic review on the health effects of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base stations', Bull World Health Organ, 2010; 88: pp. 887-96.

(8.) Rubin, G. J., Nieto-Hernandez, R. and Wessely, S. 'Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (formerly 'electromagnetic hypersensitivity'): an updated systematic review of provocation studies', Bioelectromagnetics, 2009; 31: pp. 1-11.

(9.) Salford, L., Henrietta, N., Arne, B., Gustav, G. et al., 'The mammalian brain in the electromagnetic fields designed by man with special reference to blood brain barrier function, neuronal damage and possible physical mechanisms', Prog Theor Phys Suppl (Japan), 2008; 173: pp. 283309.

(10.) World Health Organization, What are the health risks associated with mobilephones and their base stations?, Online Q & A, 2005; pp. 12-05.

(11.) Tarusawa, Y., Chshta K.; Suzuk, Y.; Nojima T. (Experimental estimation of EMI from cellular base-station antennas on implantable cardiac pacemakers"Electromagnetic Compatibility, IEEE Transactions on (Volume: 47(4))

(12.) Albert, E.N. Light and electron microscopic observations on the blood-brain barrier after microwave irradiation. In Symposium on Biological Effects and Measurements of Radiofrequency Microwaves, Washington, DC: DHEW (HEW Publications), 1977; FDA778026, p294-304. As cited in RSC, 1999.

(13.) Armstrong, B., et al. Association between exposure to pulsed electromagnetic fields and cancer in electric utility workers in Quebec, Canada and France. Am J Epidemiol, 1994; 140(9): 805-20.As cited in Elwood, 1999.

(14.) Balcer-Kubiczek, E.K., and Harrison, G.H. Neoplastic transformation of C3H/10T Y cells following exposure to 120-Hz modulated 2.45GHz microwaves and phorbol ester tumour promoter. Radiat. Res., 1991; 126: 65-72 As cited in RSC, 1999.

(15.) Bawin, S.M., Kaczmarek, L.K. and Adey, W.R. Effects of modulated VHF fields on the central nervous system. ANN NY Acad Sci, 1975; 247: 74-81. As cited in RSC, 1999.

(16.) Blackman CF, Genetics and mutagenesis. In: Biological Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, edited by Elder JA, Cahill DF. US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 1984; pp 5-945-105. EPA-600/8-83-026F. As cited in RSC, 1999.

(17.) Bortkiewicz A, Zmyslony M, Gadzicka E, Palczynski C, Szmigielski S. Ambulatory ECG monitoring in workers exposed to electromagnetic fields. J of Medical Engineering and Technology, 1997; 21(2):41-6. As cited in RSC, 1999.

(18.) Bradley, R.P. 1999. Personal communication to Ronald Macfarlane, Toronto Public Health, 1 October 1999. BUWAL (1999) Ordonnance sur la protection contre le rayonnement non ionisant (ORNI) -rapport explicatif. Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape (BUWAL),

(19.) Bern. CalEPA (1997) Technical support document for the determination of non-cancer chronic reference exposure levels. California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Berkeley.

(20.) Z. Hasan, H. Boostanimehr, and V. K. Bhargava, "Green cellular networks: A survey, some research issues and challenges," IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2011; 13(4): 524-540.

(21.) C. Mikeka and H. Arai, Design Issues in Radio Frequency Energy Harvesting System, Sustainable Energy Harvesting Technologies Past, Present and Future 2011.

(22.) A. Cuadras, M. Gasulla, and V Ferrari, (2010) "Thermal energy harvesting through pyroelectricity," Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2010; 158(1).

(23.) H. J. Visser and R. J. Vullers (2013), "Rf energy harvesting and transport for wireless sensor network applications: Principles and requirements, Proceedings of the IEEE, 101(6): 1410-1423.

(24.) Abdel-Rassoul, G., Abou El-Fatech, O., Abou Salem, M., Michael, A., Farahat, F., ElBatanouny, M., Salem, E. (2006). Neurobehavioral effects among inhabitants around mobile phone base stations. Neurotoxicology. DOI: 0.1016/j.neuro.2006.07.012.

(25.) Adey, W.R. Tissue interactions with non-ionizing electromagnetic fields. Physiol. Rev., 1981; 61: 435-514.

(26.) Atli, E., Unlu, H. The effects of microwave frequency electromagnetic fields on the development of Drosophila melanogaster. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2006; 82: 435-441.

(27.) Balmori, A. Possible effects of electromagnetic fields from phone masts on a population of White Stork (Ciconia ciconia). Electromagn. Biol. Med, 2005; 24:109-119.

(28.) Beasond, R.C., Semm, P. Responses of neurons to an amplitude modulated microwave stimulas. Neurosci. Lett., 2002; 333:175-178.

(29.) Belyaev, I.Y. Nonthermal Biological Effects of Microwaves: Current Knowledge, Further Perspective, and Urgent Needs. Electromagn. Biol. Med., 2005b; 24: 375-403.

(30.) Bernhardt, J.H, Non-ionizing radiation safety: radiofrequency radiation, electric and magnetic fields. Phys. Med. Biol., 1992; 37: 80-84.

(31.) J. Wan, O. Fujiwara, and T. Nojima, "A model for predicting electromagnetic interference of implantable cardiac pacemakers by mobile telephones," IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 2000; 48: 2121-2125.

K. Yamuna, S. Suria Narayanan

[1] Research Scholar, Sathyabama University, Chennai, India.

[2] Vice-President and CEO, Zyris Dermacare Pvt. Ltd., Chennai, India.

(Received: 06 October 2015; accepted: 18 November 2015)

* To whom all correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kyamunamail@gmail.com

Caption: Fig. 1. Reduction of RF impact from signal transmission

Caption: Fig. 2. Human Health Hazard from RF interference

Caption: Fig. 3. Reduction of Radio equipment efficiency

Caption: Fig. 4. Path Loss calculation with distance
Table 1. Path Loss Vs Distance

Freq. in mhz   RF power   d (m)   Path loss   d (m)   path loss
               (mw/m2)

939            0.003      1       971.453     5       1008.903
940            0.336      1.5     972.786     5.5     1010.736
941            0.007      1.75    973.457     6       1011.907
954            0.001      2       986.451     6.5     1025.401
955            0.119      2.25    987.569     7       1027.019
935            0.398      2.6     967.848     7.5     1007.798
943            0.002      2.9     975.452     8       1015.902
951            0.129      3.2     983.579     8.5     1024.529
1825           0.001      3.5     1857.451    9       1898.901
1827           0.687      3.8     1860.137    9.5     1902.087
1828           0.014      4.1     1860.464    10      1902.914
1830           0.3        4.4     1862.75     10.5    1905.7
COPYRIGHT 2015 Oriental Scientific Publishing Company
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Yamuna, K.; Suria Narayanan, S.
Publication:Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology
Article Type:Report
Date:Dec 1, 2015
Words:3206
Previous Article:Relative performance of certain newer insecticides against pod bug [Clavigralla gibbosa (Spinola)] on long duration Pigeonpea.
Next Article:Molecular characterization of nif genes of diazotrophs from different rice production systems in Tamil Nadu.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |