Printer Friendly

Polimorfismo molar e variacao no numero de dentes em um roedor semi-aquatico, Neusticomys oyapocki (Sigmodontinae, Ichthyomyini).

Molar polymorphism and variation in tooth number in a semi-aquatic rodent, Neusticomys oyapocki (Sigmodontinae, Ichthyomyini)

INTRODUCTION

Individual variation in tooth number can be experimentally induced and/or observed in laboratory mice and rats and imply different genetic mechanisms that have been reviewed by Cai et al. (2007), Caton and Tucker (2009), and Cobourne and Sharpe (2010). In humans, supernumerary teeth--which form in addition to the normal complement--are relatively common, occurring as an isolated finding in up to 3% of the population (Cobourne and Sharpe, 2010). Nevertheless, variation in tooth number in natural populations of cricetid rodents is seldom observed (Hooper, 1955; Libardi and Percequillo, 2014). Here we report a first case of widespread dental polymorphism in a freeranging species of a Neotropical water mouse (Ichthyomyini Vorontsov, 1959).

Ichthyomyines are New World cricetid rodents of the subfamily Sigmodontinae Wagner, 1843, which are ecologically and morphologically distinctive (Voss, 1988, 2015). There are two allopatric taxa of Ichthyomini in the Guianan region (NE Amazonia), namely Neusticomys venezuelae (Anthony, 1929) in Venezuela and Guyana, and N. oyapocki (Dubost and Petter, 1978) in the south-eastern part of the Guianas, Amapa, and eastern Para.

When the small (ca. 50 grams) semi-aquatic rodent N. oyapocki was first described by Dubost and Petter (1978), its diagnosis included the absence of upper and lower third molars, as well as the small size of its remaining cheek-teeth. A that time, N. oyapocki was the fourth known species of that ichthyomyine genus, and all specimens of the other taxa (N. monticolus, N. venezuelae, and N. peruviensis) had three molars in each quadrant of the jaw (Voss, 1988).

Subsequently, nine additional specimens of N. oyapocki were discovered (Voss et al., 2001; Nunes, 2002; Leite et al., 2007; Miranda et al., 2012) in French Guiana and in Brazilian states of Amapa and Para, all having only two molars on each quadrant. With one exception, all known specimens of three recently described congeners also have three molars in each jaw quadrant: N. mussoi (Ochoa and Soriano, 1991) from the Andes of Venezuela, N. ferreirai from the Brazilian state of Mato Grosso (Percequillo et al., 2005), and N. vossi from the eastern slope of the Ecuadorian Andes (Hanson et al., 2015). The exception is a paratype of N. ferreirai (MZUSP-32093), in which the lower right toothrow has only two molars (Percequillo et al., 2005).

We have been able to examine 26 additional specimens of N. oyapocki from Suriname, French Guiana, Amapa and Para, among which we found considerable variation in numbers of molars, which we describe here.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined museum specimens, received descriptions and photographs for a total of 37 specimens of Neusticomys oyapocki, which are listed in the Appendices 1 and 2. The age of specimens (Tooth Wear Class--TWC--as defined in Voss, 1988) was roughly divided into juveniles (TWC1, open sphenoccipital suture, immature pelage), subadults (TWC2, closed --but not fused--sphenoccipital suture, immature pelage), and adults (TWC3 to TWC6, closed to fused sphenoccipital suture, adult pelage).

Standard external measurements (Head and Body Length; Tail Length; Hind Foot Length--with claws--; Ear Length) were those recorded by the collectors. We took two additional external measurements of well-preserved specimens: length of the mystacial vibrissae, and length of the terminal tuft of long hairs on the tail.

Cranial and dental measurements were taken as described by Voss (1988: 269-271) and Voss et al. (2001: 73-75). We paid careful attention to the crown-length measurements of upper and lower molars, in order to compare Neusticomys values with homologous variables in other similar-sized taxa.

For comparing dental lengths of N. oyapocki with those of other similar-sized rodents, we selected vouchered animals (list of specimens available from senior author ) collected in French Guiana for one scansorial (Hylaeamys megacephalus), one terrestrial (Zygodontomys brevicauda), and two arboreal (Oecomys auyantepui and Rhipidomys nitela) cricetid rodents. Statistical tests were performed using the software package PAleontological STatistics (Hammer et al., 2011).

RESULTS

Our sample of Neusticomys oyapocki (N = 37) includes 11 females, 25 males, and one specimen of unknown sex. Fig. 1 indicates the 13 localities from which these were collected in Amapa (6 localities, 18 individuals), Para (2 localities, 12 specimens), French Guiana (4 localities, 6 specimens), and Suriname (1 locality, 1 specimen). Only 31 individuals (of which 10 females and 20 males, and one sex unknown) are represented by craniodental material, and these serve as the basis of our comparisons; classified by age, these include 1 juvenile, 10 subadults, and 20 adults.

Statistical comparisons suggest that there is no sexual dimorphism in external measurements of N. oyapocki (Table 1), nor is any sexual dimorphism apparent for tested craniodental measurements (Table 2). Therefore, we treat all specimens as if there were no sexual dimorphism in size, which seems to apply to all ichthyomyine taxa (Voss, 1988).

Of the 31 specimens with available dentitions, 19 (61%) have 2 molars on each jaw quadrant (8 molars total). Of the 12 remaining skulls, we encountered noteworthy variation in tooth number: 6 specimens have 2 upper molars on each side but 3 lower molars on at least 1 hemi-mandible (9 to 10 molars total), 2 specimens have 3 upper molars on one or both sides but 2 lower molars on each lower jaw (9 to 10 molars total), and 2 individuals have 3 molars in each jaw quadrant (12 molars total).

When present (Fig. 2), third molars are more often seen on lower jaws (in 10 individuals) than on upper jaws (6 individuals). The third molars are as frequent on the left (15 cases) as on the right (13 cases) sides.

The dental polymorphism can be assessed from several individuals that were collected from just two locations. These locations are from along the Rio Jari: 9 animals from the left bank at Laranjal do Jari (state of Amapa), near Cachoeira Santo Antonio (locality 12 on Fig. 1); and 8 animals from the right bank at Almeirin (state of Para), again near Cachoeira Santo Antonio (locality 11 on Fig. 1). As detailed on Table 3, dental polymorphism affects both upper and lower jaws in Laranjal do Jari, whereas it seems restricted to the lower jaws for Almeirim.

The third molars observed on N. oyapocki are tiny teeth (Fig. 2), half the size of the adjacent second molar (Table 4). Upper and lower third molars represent less than 19 and 21 percent, respectively, of the total crown length for first and second molars. Whereas M3 is a simple peglike tooth, m3 is slightly more complex, consisting of a reduced protoconid/ metaconid pair.

The first and second molar teeth of N. oyapocki are also small by comparison with those of other similar-sized sigmodontine rodents. The relative size of molars (RSM) can be expressed by the ratio between condylo-incisive length (CIL) and crown length of the first and second upper molars (M1M2); RSM is 0.10 in N. oyapocki but ranges from 0.12 to 0.13 in H. megacephalus, O. auyantepui, Z. brevicauda, and R. nitela (Table 5). By contrast, the upper incisor (measured by the depth of incisor--DI of Voss, 1988) appears stronger in N. oyapocki than in other similar sized species (Table 5). The ratio DI/M1M2 is 0.57 in N. oyapocki whereas it ranges from 0.41 (H. megacephalus) to 0.48 (R. nitela) in the four taxa under comparison.

DISCUSSION

Male and female specimens of N. oyapocki overlap broadly in all external and craniodental dimensions, conforming to the general lack of sexual dimorphism previously reported for other ichthyomyines by Voss (1988). Consequently, we combined males and females of subadult and adult specimens in order to get more robust values of metric variables for characterizing the external and skull variability in this hitherto poorly known taxon.

Polymorphism in numbers of molars is extensive, with total numbers of molars ranging from 8 to 12; that variation occurs among specimens of N. oyapocki from several localities ranging from Suriname and French Guiana to the Brazilian states of Amapa and Para. Thus, this phenomenon--which was not known previously in this species due to the scarcity of biological materials--appears to be rather widespread (see open circles in Fig. 1). Otherwise, dental polymorphism appears extremely rare in cricetid rodents, with one recent case of two individuals (out of 1763 examined specimens) with a supernumerary tooth in the sigmodontine Necromys lasiurus (Libardi and Percequillo, 2014). Because most ichthyomyines and all other cricetids normally have three upper and three lower molars, absence of third molars is probably a derived character state that has not yet been fixed in N. oyapocki.

The lengths of first and second molars are moderately variable in our sample of 31 N. oyapocki, with coefficients of variation ranging from 4.1 (for M1) to 7.3 (for m1), values at least twice as much as the corresponding statistics previously reported for the Central American ichthyomyine, Rheomys thomasi (Voss, 1988: Table 1). Nevertheless, the combined lengths of first and second molars are somewhat less variable, with coefficients of 3.3 for M1M2 and 4.7 for m1m2. Interestingly, the presence (or absence) of the third molar does not influence the crown length of the first and second molars. Unpaired Mann-Whitney tests indicate that the combined length of upper M1M2 or lower m1m2 does not vary with or without the presence of a third molar (U (MW) = 58, and p = 0.7256; U (MW) = 71, and p = 0.9774, for upper and lower jaws, respectively). Also, it appears that the presence of the third molar is not related to the size of the animal in N. oyapocki, as both F and t tests provide no statistical support for a size difference neither in Condylo-Incisive Length (6 skulls with 3 upper molars versus 25 skulls with 2 molars) nor in Mandibular Length (9 skulls with 3 lower molars versus 15 skulls with 2 molars).

In ichthyomyine rodents, the upper and lower third molars (M3/m3) are always small (or absent: this paper), and third molars have variable root morphologies (Voss, 2015). The third molars reported here for several specimens of N. oyapocki have a similar morphology as those of other species of Neusticomys (Voss, 1988: 339-347): M3 is very small, without a posterior track of metacone/hypocone; m3 is also very small, with or without a small posterior conule (see Fig. 39 in Voss, 1988).

The overwhelming majority of muroid rodents worldwide have three molars in each jaw. The few exceptions include some species and genera of carnivorous water rats and moss mice from New Guinea that have either no molar at all (Paucidentomys: Esselstyn et al., 2012) or only one or two molars per quadrant: Rhynchomys, Pseudohydromys, Neohydromys, Microhydromys, and Paraleptomys (Musser and Carleton, 2005; Balete et al., 2007; Musser et al., 2008; Esselstyn et al., 2012). In their revision of New Guinean moss mice, Helgen and Helgen (2009) have shown that there are differences in numbers of molars according to the species within the animalivorous genus Pseudohydromys: among the 12 recognized species of this Sahulian moss mouse, 5 have maxillary and mandibular toothrows consisting of just 1 small molar each, and 7 species have two molars per quadrant. Furthermore, in the species Pseudohydromys ellermanni (Laurie and Hill, 1954), Helgen and Helgen (2009) have reported polymorphism in the number of molars which is probably similar to the one we describe for Neusticomys oyapocki: all 26 known specimens of P. ellermanni have 1 molar per quadrant except 2 individuals which retain an additional small upper second molar. Another example of variation in number of molars is found in the scansorial rat Leptomys arfakensis Musser, Helgen & Lunde, 2008, in which the holotype has only 2 molars per jaw whereas the single paratype has a third extremely tiny molar (Musser et al., 2008); this is a rare exception, because four other species of Leptomys, each known by several dozen specimens, all have three molars per quadrant.

Tooth number, together with tooth size, cusp size and cusp number, are the four major factors of tooth patterning (Cai et al., 2007). As has been reported, the number of teeth is regulated by mesenchymal cell number (Cai et al., 2007), and tooth number as well as cusp number can be modelled as a reaction diffusion mechanism (Cho et al., 2007). Despite the enormous taxonomic and ecomorphological diversity of living rodents (especially Muroidea), we note that meristic variability in the molar row is more extensive in N. oyapocki than in any other known rodent species. Genomic and developmental studies of N. oyapocki could potentially offer key insights into the genetic control of molar development (Caton and Tucker, 2009; Jheon et al., 2013), as well as on the concerted effect of genetic and environmental factors on tooth development (Line, 2003).

Recibido 17 noviembre 2016. Aceptado 9 enero 2017. Editor asociado: G D'Elia

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Burton Lim shared unpublished data for a specimen of Neusticomys oyapocki from Suriname. We are grateful to Rob Voss and to Tom Lee who offered extensive corrections to our text. We appreciate the generous hospitality of the Mastozoologia team and the technical help of Jessica Souza dos Reis when studying specimens at the IEPA collection of Macapa. Our understanding of molar polymorphism in rodents benefitted from fruitful discussions with our colleague Helder Gomes Rodrigues. This research belongs to the project "Guyamazon II: Biodiversidade e zoogeografia de pequenos mamiferos no escudo das Guianas" which was funded by Ambassade de France in Brazil, IRD/AIRD (France), the French Guianan Region, CIRAD, FAPEAM, FAPEMA, and FAPEAP. Publication costs of that paper were covered by INDIGEN project of Benoit de Thoisy, through a FEDER/ERDF grant, funded by European Union, Collectivite Territoriale de Guyane, and DEAL Guyane.

LITERATURE CITED

BALETE DS, EA RICKART, RG ROSELL-AMBAL, SA JANSA and LR HEANEY. 2007. Descriptions of two new species of Rhynchomys Thomas (Rodentia: Muridae: Murinae) from Luzon Island, Philippines. Journal of Mammalogy 88:287-301.

CAI J, S-W CHO, J-Y KIM, M-J LEE, Y-G CHA, and H-S JUNG. 2007. Patterning the size and number of tooth and its cusps. Developmental Biology 304:499-507.

CATON J and AS TUCKER. 2009. Current knowledge of tooth development: patterning and mineralization of the murine dentition. Journal of Anatomy 214:502-515.

CHO SW, J CAI and HS JUNG. 2007. Patterning of tooth in rodents. European Cells and Materials 14:82.

COBOURNE MT and PT SHARPE. 2010. Making up the numbers: The molecular control of mammalian dental formula. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 21:314-324.

DUBOST G and F PETTER. 1978. Une espece nouvelle de "rat-pecheur" de Guyane francaise: Daptomys oyapocki sp. nov. (Rongeurs, Cricetidae). Mammalia 42:435-439.

ESSELSTYN JA, AS ACHMADI and KC ROWE. 2012. Evolutionary novelty in a rat with no molars. Biology Letters 8:990-993.

HAMMER O, DAT HARPER and PD RYAN. 2011. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4:1-9.

HANSON JD, G D'ELIA, SB AYERS, SB COX, SF BURNEO and TE LEE. 2015. A new species of fish-eating rat, genus Neusticomys (Sigmodontinae), from Ecuador. Zoological Studies 54:1-11.

HELGEN KM and LE HELGEN. 2009. Biodiversity and Biogeography of the Moss-mice of New Guinea: a taxonomic revision of Pseudohydromys (Muridae: Murinae). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 331:230-313.

JHEON AH, K SEIDEL, B BIEHS and OD KLEIN. 2013. From molecules to mastication: the development and evolution of teeth. Wiley Interdisciplinary Review Developmental Biology 2:165-183.

LEITE RDN, MN DA SILVA and TA GARDNER. 2007. New records of Neusticomys oyapocki (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae) from a human-dominated forest landscape in northeastern Brazilian Amazonia. Mastozoologia Neotropical 14:257-261.

LIBARDI GS and AR PERCEQUILLO. 2014. Supernumerary teeth in Necromys lasiurus (Rodentia, Cricetidae): The first record in Sigmodontinae. Mastozoologia Neotropical 21:219-229.

LINE SR. 2003. Variation of tooth number in mammalian dentition: connecting genetics, development, and evolution. Evolution & Development 5:295-304.

MIRANDA CL, RV ROSSI, TBF SEMEDO and TA FLORES. 2012. New records and geographic distribution extension of Neusticomys ferreirai and N. oyapocki (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae). Mammalian Biology 76:335-339.

MUSSER GG and MD CARLETON. 2005. Superfamily Muroidea, Pp. 894-1531 in: Mammal species of the world. A taxonomic and geographic reference (DE Wilson and DM Reeder, eds.). Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

MUSSER GG, KM HELGEN and DP LUNDE. 2008. Systematic review of New Guinea Leptomys (Muridae, Murinae) with descriptions of two new species. American Museum Novitates 3624:1-60.

NUNES A. 2002. First record of Neusticomys oyapocki (Muridae: Sigmodontinae) from the Brazilian Amazon. Mammalia 66:445-447.

OCHOA J and P SORIANO. 1991. A new species of water rat, genus Neusticomys Anthony, from the Andes of Venezuela. Journal of Mammalogy 72:97-103.

PERCEQUILLO AR, AP CARMIGNOTTO and MJ SILVA. 2005. A new species of Neusticomys (Ichthyomyini, Sigmodontinae) from central Brazilian Amazonia. Journal of Mammalogy 86:873-880.

ROWE KC, AS ACHMADI and JA ESSELSTYN. 2016. Repeated evolution of carnivory among IndoAustralian rodents. Evolution 70:653-695.

VOSS RS. 1988. Systematics and ecology of ichthyomyine rodents (Muroidea): patterns of morphological evolution in a small adaptive radiation. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 188:259-493.

VOSS RS. 2015. Tribe Ichthyomyini Vorontsov, 1959, Pp. 279-290 in: Mammals of South America, Volume 2. Rodents (JL Patton, UFJ Pardinas and G D'Elia, eds.). The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

VOSS RS, DP LUNDE and NB SIMMONS. 2001. The mammals of Paracou, French Guiana: A Neotropical lowland rainforest fauna. Part 2: Nonvolant species. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 263:1-236.

APPENDIX 1

Specimens of Neusticomys oyapocki examined

Specimens of Neusticomys oyapocki examined or mentioned are organized by country and locality according to the map of Fig. 1.

Abbreviations for Institutions: AMNH = American Museum of Natural History (New York); IEPA = Instituto de Pesquisas Cientificas e Tecnologicas do Estado do Amapa (Macapa); INPA = Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia (Manaus); ISEM = Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier (Montpellier); MHNG = Museum d'Histoire Naturelle de Geneve (Geneva); MNHN = Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle (Paris); MPEG = Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi (Belem); ROM = Royal Ontario Museum (Toronto).

BRAZIL: Amapa State: MPEG-34251: Amapa District: Fazenda Itapoa (locality 6); INPA-5243 to 5245: Area da Mineracao Itajobi: approx. 15 km East from Serra do Navio (locality 8); IEPA-3269: Laranjal do Jari-proximo BR 156 (locality 10); IEPA-1512, -1516, -2047, -2722, -2723, -2731, -3268, -3750: Laranjal do Jari: left bank of Rio Jari (locality 12); IEPA-3703, -3714: Mazagao: right bank of Rio Vila Nova (locality 9); IEPA-3258, 3536: Porto Grande, right bank of Rio Araguari (locality 7). Para State: IEPA-1515, -1517, -1520, -1527, -1541, -1765, -2460, -2732, INPA-5141, -5151, -5154: Almeirim, right bank of Rio Jari (locality 11); MPEG-39999: Obidos municipality: Curua River (locality 13).

FRENCH GUIANA: MNHN-1977-775, ISEM-V-2832: Camopi: Trois Sauts (locality 5); ISEM-V-1647: Regina: Nouragues field station (locality 3); MNHN-1995-3234: Saint-Elie: Saint-Eugene along Courcibo River (locality 2); AMNH-267597, MNHN-1995-992: Sinnamary: Paracou (locality 1).

SURINAME: ROM-120588: Sipaliwini: Kutari River Camp (locality 4)

APPENDIX 2

List of specimens for comparisons with four other similar-sized Sigmodontinae.

Abbreviations for institutions as for Appendix 1.

Hylaeamys megacephalus (Fischer, 1814)

ISEM: V-1137, V-1693, V-2116, V-2137, V-2680;

MHNG: 1880.025, 1880.032, 1880.034, 1880.035, 1880.036, 1885.001, 1885.002, 1885.003, 1885.004, 1885.005, 1885.007, 1885.064, 1889.100, 1890.002, 1890.003, 1954.053, 1960.010, 1962.074, 1962.088, 1962.095, 1963.017, 1963.036, 1970.008, 1970.015, 1970.017, 1970.019, 1970.022, 1972.030, 1972.031, 1972.032, 1972.033, 1972.034, 1974.069, 1978.046, 1978.061, 1979.064, 1979.068, 1983.096, 1990.013, 1990.042, 1999.003, 1999.004, 1999.005, 1999.006, 1999.007, 1999.008, 1999.049; MNHN: 1902-44, 1986-288, 1986-317, 1986-319, 2001-2229, 2001-2232, 2007-47;

Oecomys auyantepui Tate, 1939

IEPA: 3176, 3177, 3182, 3190;

ISEM: V-2126, V-2127;

MHNG: 1894.029, 1962.075, 1962.081, 1963.033, 1969.038, 1969.094, 1970.009, 1972.025, 1974.034, 1975.039, 1975.047, 1975.050, 1975.081, 1979.060, 1979.061, 1979.066, 1979.070, 1979.078, 1979.084, 1979.088, 1990.028, 1990.034, 1999.026, 1999.027, 1999.028, 1999.029, 1999.030, 1999.034, 1999.040, 1999.044;

MNHN: 1983-394, 1983-395, 1983-401, 1994-124, 1995-1027, 1995-3235, 1998-1844, 1999-140, 1999-141, 1999-142, 1999143, 1999-144, 1999-145, 2003-50, 2004-324, 2007-40, 2007-41, 2007-42, 2007-43;ROM: 114022, 114121, 114314, 114331, 114338, 114342, 114357, 114358

Rhipidomys nitela Thomas, 1901

ISEM: V-0905, V-0914;

MHNG: 1886.054, 1890.013, 1890.014, 1894.016, 1962.094, 1969.090, 1969.093, 1969.096, 1969.100, 1972.064, 1972.065, 1972.066, 1974.050, 1975.048, 1975.073, 1975.080, 1975.085, 1975.088, 1979.071;MNHN: 2000-220, 2001-2063, 2001-2194, 2001-2195, 2001-2200, 2001-2201, 2001-2202, 2001-2203, 2001-2204, 2001-2206, 2001-2207, 2001-2208, 2001-2211, 20012212, 2003-42, 2003-43, 2007-55, 2007-56, 2007-57;

ROM: 114147;

Zygodontomys brevicauda (J.A. Allen & Chapman, 1893)

ISEM: V-0980, V-0984;

MHNG: 1885.012, 1885.013, 1885.014, 1885.015, 1885.016, 1885.017, 1885.018, 1886.055, 1886.056, 1886.057, 1889.083, 1974.054, 1975.015, 1975.084, 1984.045, 1984.055, 1990.027, 1990.051, 1990.052, 1990.055, 1990.057, 1990.058, 1990.059, 1990.061, 1990.062, 1990.063, 1990.064, 1990.065, 1990.066, 1990.067, 1990.068, 1990.069, 1991.029, 1991.030, 1991.031, 1991.032, 1996.016;

MNHN: 1986-917, 1986-921, 1986-924, 1986-926, 1986-929, 1986-930, 1986-936, 1986-937, 1986-938, 1986-945, 1986-946, 1986-947, 1986-948, 1986-949, 1986-950, 2000-1109, 2000-1111, 2000-1112, 2000-1113, 2001-2234, 2003-774

Francois Catzeflis (1), Benoit de Thoisy (2), Maria Nazareth Ferreira da Silva (3) and Claudia Regina da Silva (4)

(1) Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution, CNRS UMR-5554, Universite Montpellier-2, F-34095 Montpellier, France. [Correspondence: Francois Catzeflis <francois.catzeflis@univ-montp2.fr>] (2) Laboratoire des Interactions Virus-Hotes, Institut Pasteur de la Guyane, 23 Avenue Pasteur, BP 6010, 97306 Cayenne cedex, French Guiana & association Kwata, 16 avenue Pasteur, 97300 Cayenne, French Guiana (3) Colecao de Mamiferos, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia (INPA), Av. Andre Araujo, no. 2936, Bairro Petropolis, CEP 69067-375 Manaus, AM, Brazil (4) Laboratorio de Mamiferos, Instituto de Pesquisas Cientificas e Tecnologicas do Estado do Amapa, Rodovia JK, Km 10, s/n, bairro Fazendinha, CEP 68912-250, Macapa, Amapa, Brazil

Caption: Fig. 1: Map of part of the Guianan Shield with 13 localities from where specimens of Neusticomys oyapocki have been examined. Open circles (localities 3, 4, 8, 10, 11 & 12) for locations where the presence of animals with at least one third molar has been evidenced. Closed black circles for localities with animals characterized by only two molars, as per the holotype of N. oyapocki.

Caption: Fig. 2: Upper (A, B) and lower (C, D) dental rows in Neusticomys oyapocki specimens with three molars. A = INPA-5245; B = IEPA-3714; C = INPA-5154; D = ISEMV-1647. The vertical bar is a 1 mm scale.
Table 1 External measurements (in mm; weight in g) for Neusticomys
oyapocki. Mann-Whitney non-parametric tests for comparing sexes.
Abbreviations: HBL = Head and Body Length; TL = Tail Length;
HF = Hind Foot length (with claws); Ea = Ear length;
MV = Mystacial Vibrissae; TT = Tail Tuft; We = Weight;
U (MW) = U-value for Mann-Whitney test.

Females    HBL     TL      HF      Ea      MV      TT      We

Mean      121.1   81.5    24.0    10.6    37.1     6.1    53.3
Min       96.0    66.0    20.0     6.0    32.0     4.0    21.0
Max       140.0   110.0   27.0    14.0    42.0     8.0    100.0
N          11      11       7       7       8       7      10

Males      HBL     TL      HF      Ea      MV      TT      We

Mean      115.4   80.4    24.9    10.9    37.2     4.2    41.8
Min       89.0    71.0    22.5     9.0    30.0     2.0    16.0
Max       151.0   91.0    27.0    12.0    47.0     8.0    69.0
N          14      14      14      14      11       9      14
U (MW)    57.0    75.5    32.5    46.5    42.0    11.0    53.5
p =       0.285   0.946   0.230   0.851   0.888   0.032   0.348

Table 2 Skull measurements (in mm) for Neusticomys oyapocki.
Mann-Whitney non-parametric tests for comparing
sexes. Abbreviations: CIL = Condylo-Incisive Length;
ZB = Zygomatic Breadth; LN =Length of Nasals; LIB = Least
Interorbital Breadth; LIF = Length of the Incisive Foramina;
LD = Length of Diastema; BOC =Breadth of the
Occipital Condyles; M1M2: crown length between first
and second upper molars. U (MW) = U-value for Mann-Whitney test.

Females    CIL       ZB       LN      LIB

Mean      27.46    13.98    10.60     5.12
Min       24.00    12.10     9.00     4.52
Max       32.80    16.80    13.00     5.45
N           10       10       7        10

Males      CIL       ZB       LN      LIB

Mean      26.99    14.01    10.30     5.19
Min       22.00    12.00     8.85     4.80
Max       29.50    15.80    11.60     5.54
N           20       20       16       20
U (MW)     89.5      98       54       88
p =       0.6598   0.9474   0.9201   0.6125

Females    LIF       LD      BOC      M1M2

Mean       4.61     7.66     7.27     2.90
Min        4.10     6.60     6.50     2.70
Max        5.30     9.60     7.92     3.05
N           10       10       8        10

Males      LIF       LD      BOC      M1M2

Mean       4.72     7.55     7.11     2.89
Min        3.90     5.80     6.83     2.74
Max        5.42     8.70     7.47     3.07
N           20       20       15       20
U (MW)      83       97      42.5     92.5
p =       0.4677   0.9123   0.2721   0.7568

Table 3 Polymorphism in the numbers of molars in two
opposite localities along the Rio Jari: Laranjal (left
bank: Amapa side) and Almeirin (righ bank: Para
side). Molars are organized as upper left/upper right;
lower left/lower right. One animal from Almeirin
has its mandibles missing and is coded as ? / ? .
Laranjal and Almeirim are localities 12 and 11,
respectively, onto Fig. 1.

Molars            Laranjal   Almeirim

2 / 2 ; 2 / 2        4          4
2 / 2 ; 3 / 3        1          3
3 / 3 ; 2 / 2        1          0
3 / 3 ; 3 / 3        1          0
2 / 2 ; ? / ?        0          1

Table 4 Dental measurements (crown length, in mm)
for upper (M) and lower (m) molars in N. oyapocki.
Abbreviations: SD = Standard-Deviation; N = sample size.

        Ml     M2     M3     ml     m2     m3

Mean   1.84   1.05   0.55   1.55   1.19   0.56
Min    1.69   0.92   0.46   1.37   1.02   0.51
Max    2.02   1.16   0.62   1.81   1.31   0.60
SD     0.08   0.07   0.07   0.11   0.06   0.03
N       25     25     5      24     24     9

Table 5 Selected measurements (in mm; weight in g) in
Neusticomys oyapocki and in four similar-sized (average
weight from 39 to 57 g) species of Guianan Sigmodontinae.
Abbreviations: M1M2 = crown length of upper
first and second molars; DI = depth of upper incisor;
CIL = condylo-incisive length. SD = standard-deviation;
N = sample size

                        M1M2    DI    CIL    Weight

Neusticomys      mean   2.88   1.65   27.6    49.6
  oyapocki        SD    0.09   0.18   2.1     21.7
                 min    2.7    1.4    23.7    24.0
                 max    3.1    2.1    32.8   100.0
                  N      25     25     25      15
Hylaeamys        mean   3.45   1.40   26.8    45.3
  megacephalus    SD    0.14   0.13   1.5     10.0
                 min    3.1    1.1    22.7    24.5
                 max    3.8    1.6    29.1    80.0
                  N      59     42     58      43
Oecomys          mean   3.18   1.49   25.0    38.7
  auyantepui      SD    0.09   0.17   1.8     8.9
                 min    3.0    1.2    21.3    24.0
                 max    3.4    1.9    28.5    62.0
                  N      63     62     63      37
Rhipidomys       mean   3.34   1.60   27.6    53.1
  nitela          SD    0.11   0.16   1.7     12.9
                 min    3.0    1.2    23.8    35.0
                 max    3.6    1.9    31.3    85.0
                  N      41     41     41      31
Zygodontomys     mean   3.34   1.51   27.3    57.2
  brevicauda      SD    0.13   0.13   1.8     16.0
                 min    3.1    1.2    22.9    26.0
                 max    3.7    1.8    30.7    92.0
                  N      60     59     59      38
COPYRIGHT 2017 Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamiferos
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Catzeflis, Francois; de Thoisy, Benoit; Ferreira da Silva, Maria Nazareth; da Silva, Claudia Regina
Publication:Mastozoologia Neotropical
Date:Jun 1, 2017
Words:4667
Previous Article:Biologia reproductiva de Artibeus lituratus y Artibeus jamaicensis (Phyllostomidae: stenodermatinae) en un area urbana en Colombia.
Next Article:Mamiferos terrestres da bacia do Rio Jequitinhonha, Brasil: uma area de transicao entre a Floresta Atlantica e o Cerrado.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters