Piper commutatum (Piperaceae), the correct name for a widespread species in Mexico and Mesoamerica.
As would be expected with such a large taxon, the nomenclatural and taxonomic history of Piper is complex and challenging. This is primarily due to three reasons. First, the flowers are small and morphologically homogeneous across the genus; second, many species have been described on the basis of characteristics of little taxonomic value or sterile specimens; and third, many new species have been proposed for plants occurring in different political regions, despite their similarity with previously described species from other regions (Bornstein, 1989). One problematic name is Piper sanctum (Miq.) Schltdl. ex C. DC. This was first described as Artanthe sancta in 1845, based on specimens housed in the Schlechtendal Herbarium, now at HAL (Miquel, 1845). The material used is referred by Miquel as collection Schiede 1105, from Atlacomulco in the Mexican state of Veracruz. The description is relatively incomplete, and the cited material does not have inflorescences. In fact, the type collection consists of a single leaf with no other structures (Fig. 1) and corresponds precisely with the morphological description provided in the protologue. The combination Piper sanctum was subsequently made by C. de Candolle (1869), citing the Miquel binomial but with a mistake in the collection number (Schiede 105). Furthermore, I am able to confirm that he indeed saw Schiede 1105, because in the herbarium G-DC there is a calc, made on translucid paper, which correspond to the leaf shape of the species. That tracing was made by de Candolle himself, as he did for many species (available in C-DG, G00322955), and is provided with the number 1105.
Piper sanctum was subsequently recognized by Standley (1920), accompanied by many common names and reported from the Mexican states of Oaxaca, Tabasco and Veracruz. Tebbs also treated it as a distinct species (1993) and listed its distribution as ranging from Mexico to Costa Rica. In addition to its basionym, the latter author treated various binomials as synonyms: Piper papantlense C. DC., P. diandrum C. DC., P. venulosum Trel, P. dissimulans Trel., and P. heterophlebium Trel. ex Standl. Apparently Tebbs did not see original material of Piper sanctum, as she cited the type as "Schiede 105 [sic] (?B, holotype)." However, while searching in the database and realizing an extensive revision in the herbarium of the Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem (B) in December 2014, I did not find any material collected by Schiede with this number, and I believe that she was perpetuating C. de Candolle's error.
In conjunction with a revision of the genus in the Mexican state of Michoacan, I reviewed the types of many of the taxa treated by Tebbs, including those of Piper sanctum and the species that she listed as its synonyms. Much to my surprise, I encountered that Tebbs' application of the name was erroneous, and that the type clearly corresponds to the earlier described P. auritum Kunth. Piper auritum ranges from Mexico to Colombia and the Antilles, occurring commonly along edges of rivers in cloud forest, tropical perennial forest, tropical subdeciduous forest and humid canyons in tropical deciduous forest, at elevations from sea level to 2260 m. It also often grows beside agricultural crops or is cultivated in domestic gardens. It is very common in Veracruz, where it is widely employed in traditional medicine and the preparation of various culinary dishes. It has many common names in Spanish, including "Acuyo," "Hoja de Ajan," "Hoja Santa," and "Hierba Santa". The word "Santa" means holy in Spanish, as does Miquel's Latin species epithet "sancta," and undoubtedly, he choose the specific epithet in reference to its common name in Veracruz. Apparently, Tebbs did not take into consideration the protologue of Artanthe sancta, and its new combination of Piper sanctum, which clearly indicate that the leaves are membranaceous, punctate pellucid, puberulent along the veins and margin, and with five secondary nerves all originating along the middle part of the leaf (pinnatinerved):
"foliis membranaceis pellucido-punctatis utrinque subtus praesertim in nervis et secus margines puberulis rotundato-cordatis ... costis usque ad 1/2 alt. utrinque" (Miquel, 1845); "foliis tenuiter membranaceis pellucido-punctatis utrinque praesertim subtus ad nervos et secus margines puberulis rotundato-cordatis ... Usque nervos utrinque 5 supremos ad apicem ductos infimos e basi solutos mittente" (de Candolle, 1869).
The synonyms recognized by Tebbs, in contrast, have non-membranaceous leaves that are glabrous along the veins and margin and have seven to nine secondary nerves, all originating from the base of the leaf (palmatinerved). Since this error, a number of authors have followed her misapplication of the name Piper sanctum (e.g., Callejas, 2001; Bornstein and Coe, 2007; Jaramillo et al., 2008).
Piper auritum has dimorphic leaves, as described in detail in the description below. Those of the sympodial axis are different from those of the monopodial axis. It is worth mentioning that the leaf of the type specimen of Piper sanctum is from the monopodial axis, whereas the leaves of the type specimens of P. auritum are from the sympodial axis. However, there is no doubt that both specimens represent the same species.
The oldest binomial for the species to which Tebbs misapplied the name Piper sanctum is P. commutatum Steud., the holotype of which is a collection of Schiede s.n., from near Papantla, Veracruz (Fig. 2), housed in HAL. It is worth noting that Piper commutatum was published as a new name for Steffensia plantaginea Kunth, because a new combination was not possible in Piper due to the earlier binomial Piper plantagineum Lam. It ranges from central Mexico to Costa Rica, occurring in cloud forest, tropical perennial forest, tropical subdeciduous forest, and humid canyons in tropical deciduous forest, at elevations from sea level to 2050 m.
PIPER COMMUTATUM DIFFERS FROM P. AURITUM AS INDICATED BY THE FOLLOWING KEY:
a Prophylls 0.5-1 mm long, hidden by the sheathing petiole. Petiole sheathing, 4-9 cm long. Leaf blade oblong-elliptic to elliptic-ovate, 13-45 cm long; base asymmetrical in sympodial leaves, cordate to deeply auriculate, the biggest lobe half or completely overlapping the petiole; pinnately veined with 8-16 secondary veins; ciliate and minutely pubescent on both surfaces. Inflorescences 12-28( 35) cm long. Fruits trigonous in cross section ... Piper auritum
b Prophylls 6-30 mm long, not hidden by the petiole. Petiole vaginate at the base, 1.5-3.5 cm long. Leaf blade broadly ovate or oblong-lanceolate to elliptic, 6-19 cm long; base symmetrical in sympodial leaves, obtuse to rounded, sometimes cordate in monopodial leaves; palmately veined with 3-7 veins; non ciliate and glabrous on both surfaces. Inflorescences 6-10(-22) cm long. Fruits round to oblong in cross section ... Piper commutatum
Nomenclatural information, synonymy and description for both species are presented hereafter.
Piper auritum Kunth, Nov. Gen. Sp. (Quarto ed.) 1: 54. 1815 [equivalent to] Schilleria aurita (Kunth) Kunth, Linnaea 13: 713. 1839 [equivalent to] Artanthe aurita (Kunth) Miq., Syst. Piperac.: 400. 1844. Type: "Crescit in regni Novae Hispaniae temperatis", without date, Humboldt & Bonplands.n. (holotype P!, isotype: P!). The protologue states that the collection is from near Jalapa, Veracruz, Mexico, but the types lack precise locality information.
= Artanthe sancta Miq., Linnaea 18: 714. 1844 [equivalent to] Piper sanctum (Miq.) Schltdl. ex C. DC. in DC., Prodr. 16(1): 330. 1869. Type: MEXICO. Veracruz, Atlacomulco, Schiede 1105 (Holotype: HAL!).
= Artanthe seemanniana Miq., Bot. Voy. Herald [Seemann] 99, t.39. 1854. Type: PANAMA. Southern Darien, Seemann 1069 (holotype: BM!).
= Piperperlongipes Trel., Contr. U.S. Nat. Herb. 26: 154. 1929. Type: COSTA RICA. Pejivalle, Cartago, Standley & Valerio 46834 (holotype: US!).
= P. alstoni Trel., Ann. Missouri. Bot. Gard. 27: 287. 1940. Type: PANAMA. Cocle, North rim of El Valle de Anton, Alston & Allen 1842 (holotype: ILL!; isotypes: MO!, NY!, US!).
= Piper auritilimbum Trel., Publ. Field Mus. Nat. Hist. Bot. Ser. 9: 277. 1940. Type: HONDURAS. Atlantida, Rio Danto, Yuncker et al. 8763 (holotype: ILL!; isotypes: BM!, GH!, K!, MO!, NY!).
= Piper auritilaminum Trel., Publ. Field Nat. Hist. Bot. Ser. 9: 277. 1940. Type: HONDURAS. Atlantida, La Ceiba, Yuncker et al. 8263 (holotype: ILL; isotypes: BM!, GH!, MO!, NY!).
= Piper heraldii Trel. var. cocleanum Trel., Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 27: 292. 1940. Type: PANAMA. Cocle, vicinity of El Valle, Allen 1192 (holotype: ILL!; isotypes: GH!, ILL!, MO!, US!).
Shrubs 1-6 m high, stems green, glabrous or minutely pubescent when young, pale brownish and glabrous at maturity. Prophylls reduced, 0.5-1 mm long, hidden in the petiole. Leaves with petiole, 4-7(-9) cm long, sheathing the young shoots, petiolar margins membranaceous, translucid, extending through 2/3 of the petiole, glabrous or minutely pubescent, with lustrose appearance; leaf blades (13-)15-27(-45) cm long, 12-21(-26) cm wide, dimorphic through the sympodial axis, monopodial leaves ovate or widely ovate, cordate and slightly auriculate at the base, with the lobes almost symmetrical; sympodial leaves elliptic-ovate, cordate to deeply auriculate at the base, with the lobes asymmetrical, the bigger lobe half or completely overlapping the petiole; obtuse to shortly acuminate at the apex, ciliate at the margin, minutely pubescent in both surfaces; pinnately nerved, veins 4-8, inconspicuously punctate pellucid; membranaceous, with a matt appearance. Inflorescences 12-28(-35) cm long, erect when young, arching in anthesis, pendulous in fruit; peduncle 4-9(-11) cm long, glabrous. Flowers sessile, subtended by triangular to orbicular bracts, 0.2 mm wide, margin densely pubescent, with white trichomes; anthers 2, 0.3 mm long, filaments of equal length, stigmas 3, sessile. Fruits obovoid, trigonous in cross section, 0.6-1 mm wide, glabrous, with a central depression.
Piper commutatum Steud. Nom. Bot. ed. 2. 2: 340. 1841 [equivalent to] Steffensia plantaginea Kunth Linnaea 13: 672. 1840 [equivalent to] Artanthe plantaginea (Kunth) Miq. Syst. Piperac.: 389. 1844. Type: MEXICO. Veracruz, Papantla, Schiede s.n. (holotype: HAL!).
= Piper nudum C. DC. in DC., Prodr. 16(1): 325. 1869. Type: MEXICO. "Nova Hispania", Sesse & Mocino s.n. (holotype: G!, isotype: MO!)
= Piperpapantlense C. DC. in DC., Prodr. 16(1): 338. 1869. Type: MEXICO. Veracruz, near Papantla, Fischer 74 (holotype: LE!).
= Piper membranaceum C. DC. in DC., Prodr. 16(1): 366. 1869. Type: MEXICO. "Nova Hispania", Sesse & Mocino s.n. (holotype: G!).
= Piper diandrum C.DC., Linnaea 37: 364. 1872. Type: MEXICO. Veracruz, Pital, vicinities of Rio Nautla, Liebmann 55 (lectotype: C!). It is worth noting that this name was based on several collections made by Liebmann (55, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, and 63, all at C!) as well as Bernoulli 267 (G-DC!). Tebbs (1993) indicated that Liebmann 55 at C is the holotype. However, this is an error as this specimen needs to be considered as a lectotype according to Art. 9.9, ex. 10 of the International Code of Nomenclature (McNeill et al., 2012).
= Piper patulum Bertol. var. cordifolium Trel., J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 13: 366. 1923. Type: EL SALVADOR. Dept. Sonsonate, Nahulingo, Standley 22046 (holotype: ILL; isotypes: GH!, NY!, US!).
= Piper venulosum Trel., Contr. U.S. Natl. Herb. 26: 132. 1929. Type: COSTA RICA. Prov. Alajuela, San Ramon, Brenes 14192 (holotype: US!; isotypes F, G* 2 , GH!, K!).
= Piper heterophlebium Trel. ex Standl., Publ. Field Mus. Nat. Hist. Bot. Ser. 18: 345. 1937. Type: COSTA RICA. Prov. San Jose, El General, Skutch 2293 (holotype: US; isotypes: A!, K!, MO, NY!, S!).
Shrubs 1-5 m tall, stems green, glabrous or glabrescent when young, pale gray and glabrous and minutely lenticellate at maturity. Prophylls (7-)10-15(-30) mm long, with a glabrous, acute apex. Leaves with a petiole, 0.3-1.5(3.5) cm long, vaginate to 1/2 of the length, petiolar margins reduced, membranaceous and translucid, extending through ca. 1 mm of the petiole, glabrous with matt appearance, leaf blades (6-)10-16(19) cm long, (2-)6-13(-15) cm wide, dimorphic through the sympodial axe, monopodial leaves ovate to broadly ovate, slightly to deeply cordate at the base, with the lobes slightly asymmetrical; sympodial leaves oblong-lanceolate to elliptic, obtuse to round, almost symmetrical at the base; moderately to long acuminate at the apex; non-ciliate at the margin, glabrous or with occasional minutely hairs on both surfaces; palmately nerved, veins (3-)5-7(-9); non-membranaceous, with lustrous appearance. Inflorescences 4-10(-14) cm long, erect when young, somewhat slender in anthesis, becoming pendulous in fruit; peduncle 6-10(-15) cm long, glabrous or with minute hairs. Flowers sessile, subtended by round to triangular bracts, 0.4-0.6 mm wide, margin sparsely to dense pubescent, with greenish to brown trichomes; anthers 2, 0.2-0.3 mm long, filaments 0.5 mm long, stigmas 3-4, sessile. Fruits obovoid, round to oblong in cross section, 1-2 mm wide, glabrous, sometimes with a central depression.
I thank the following herbaria for providing photos of the types examined in this study: A, BM, C, G, GH, H, HAL, ILL, LE, MO, NY, S, and US. I especially thank the support of the curators Dr. Roger Vogt, Dr. Ib Friis, Dr. Nicholas Fumeaux, and Dr. Marc Jeanson, who have received me and provided access to the historical collections, making a very nice stay in their respective herbaria: Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem, Zentraleinrichtung der Freien Universitat Berlin, Germany (B); Natural History Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark (C); Conservatoire et Jardin Botaniques de la Ville de Geneve, Geneva, Switzerland (G & G-DC) & Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris France, (P). Funding support for this research was provided by the Mexican Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT) and from the Comision Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO). Dr. Marie-Stephanie Samain, Dr. Jerzy Rzedowski, and two anonymous reviewers provided many useful comments, corrections and suggestions. Special thanks to Victor Steinmann.
Bornstein, A. J. 1989. Taxonomic studies in the Piperaceae-I. The pedicellate pipers of Mexico and Central America (Piper subgen. Arctottonia). Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 70: 1-55.
Bornstein, A. and F. G. Coe. 2007. The genus Piper (Piperaceae) in Honduras. Novon 17: 11-19.
Burger, W. C. 1971. Piperaceae. In: Burger, W. C. (ed.). Flora Costaricensis. Fieldiana, Botany 35: 5-218.
Callejas, R. 2001. Piperaceae. In: Stevens, W. D., C. Ulloa, A. Pool and O. M. Montiel (eds.). Flora de Nicaragua. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 1928-1984.
De Candolle, C. 1869. Piperaceae. Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis 16(1): 235-471.
De Candolle, C. 1923. Piperacearum Clavis Analytica. Extract from Candollea 1: 65-415. Organe du Conservatoire et du Jardin botaniques de Geneve. Geneve, Switzerland.
Frodin, D. G. 2004. History and concepts of big plant genera. Taxon 53: 753-776.
Jaramillo, M. A., R. Callejas, C. Davidson, J. F. Smith, A.C. Stevens and E. J. Tepe. 2008. A phylogeny of the tropical genus Piper using ITS and the chloroplast intronpsbJ-petA. Systematic Botany 33: 647-660.
Kunth, K. 1839. Bemerkungen uber die Familie der Piperaceen. Linnaea 13: 562-726.
McNeill, J., F. R. Barrie, W. R. Buck, V. Demoulin, W. Greuter, D. L. Hawksworth, P. S. Herendeen, S. Knapp, K. Marhold, J. Prado, W. F. Prud'homme van Reine, G. F. Smith, J. H. Wiersema and N. Turland (eds. and comps.). 2012. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code). Regnum Vegetabile. Vol. 154. Koeltz Scientific Books. Konigstein, Germany. Accessed in 2016 on: http:// www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/main.php?page=title.
Miquel, F. A. G. 1843-1844. Systema Piperacearum. Kramers, H. A. (ed.). Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 575 pp.
Miquel, F. A. G. 1845. Observationes de Quibusdam Piperaceis Herbarii Schlechtendaliani. Linnaea 18: 710-716.
Quijano-Abril, M. A., R. Callejas-Posada and D. R. Miranda-Esquivel. 2006. Areas of endemism and distribution patterns for neotropical Piper species (Piperaceae). Journal of Biogeography 33: 1266-1278.
Ramirez A., J. M. 2013. Revision taxonomica del genero Piper (Piperaceae) en Michoacan, Mexico. Tesis de licenciatura. Facultad de Biologia, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolas de Hidalgo. Morelia, Michoacan, Mexico. 75 pp.
Saralegui-Boza, H. 2004. Piperaceae. Flora de la Republica de Cuba 9(3): 1-94.
Standley, P. C. 1920. Piperaceae. In: Trees and shrubs of Mexico. Contributions from the United States National Herbarium 23: 145-1561.
Standley, P. C. and J. A. Steyermark. 1952. Piperaceae. In: Standley, P. C. and J. A. Steyermark (eds.). Flora of Guatemala--Part III. Fieldiana, Botany 24(3): 228-337.
Steyermark, J. A. 1984. Piperaceae. Flora de Venezuela 2: 1-619.
Tebbs, M. C. 1989. Revision of Piper (Piperaceae) in the New World. 1. Review of characters and taxonomy of Piper section Macrostachys. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Botany 19: 117-158.
Tebbs, M. C. 1990. Revision of Piper (Piperaceae) in the New World. 2. The taxonomy of Piper section Churumayu. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Botany 20: 193-236.
Tebbs, M. C. 1993. Revision of Piper (Piperaceae) in the New World 3. The taxonomy of Piper sections Lepianthes and Radula. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Botany 23: 1-50.
Trelease, W. 1921. North American pipers of the section Ottonia. American Journal of Botany 8: 212-217.
Trelease, W. 1935. The pedicellate peppers of South America. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 75: 691-716.
Trelease, W. and T. G. Yuncker. 1950. The Piperaceae of northern South America. 2 Vols. University of Illinois Press. Urbana, Illinois, U.S.A. 838 pp.
Yuncker, T. G. 1953. The Piperaceae of Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile. Lilloa 27: 97-284, plates 1-145.
Yuncker, T. G. 1972. The Piperaceae of Brazil 1: Piper--group I, II, III, and IV. Hoehnea 2: 19-366, figs. 1-167.
Yuncker, T. G. 1973. The Piperaceae of Brazil 2: Piper--group V; Ottonia, Pothomorphe, Sarcorhachis. Hoehnea 3: 29-284, figs. 1-134.
Recibido en octubre de 2014.
Aceptado en mayo de 2016.
JOSE MANUEL RAMIREZ AMEZCUA
Instituto de Ecologia, A.C., Centro Regional del Bajio, Apdo. postal 386, 61600 Patzcuaro, Michoacan, Mexico.
Author for correspondence: email@example.com
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Ramirez Amezcua, Jose Manuel|
|Publication:||Acta Botanica Mexicana|
|Date:||Jul 1, 2016|
|Previous Article:||Pisonia Donnellsmithii (Nyctaginaceae), adicion a la flora de Guerrero, Mexico.|
|Next Article:||Variacion morfologica de coryphantha (Cactaceae): un enfoque multivariado.|