Printer Friendly

Phytosociology and dynamics of calcareous grasslands in Kemeri National Park, Latvia/Lubjarikaste rohumaade futosotsioloogia ja dunaamika Kemeri rahvuspargis (Lati).

INTRODUCTION

Semi-natural grasslands, both hay meadows and pastures, have significantly decreased in Latvia due to the decline of traditional grassland management practices (Rusina, 2007, 2008). Both abandonment and intensive agriculture have influenced the cover of low-productive grasslands, which have been ameliorated and cultivated or abandoned during the last half a century.

Semi-natural calcareous grasslands in Latvia are formed on dolomite or limestone bedrocks, carbonate-rich moraine, or carbonate-rich peat soils, and are dominated by a complex of calcareous species. Calcareous grasslands in Latvia harbour many rare and specialist plant species. Today all semi-natural calcareous grassland types are rare in Latvia, and are therefore protected both by national and European legislative acts. In 2003 the total area of semi-natural grasslands was estimated at only 17 323 ha or 0.3% of the territory of Latvia. Of these approximately 6.4% (1116 ha) was classified as dry calcareous grasslands Bromion erecti, 4.88% (846 ha) as humid oligotrophic grasslands Molinion caerulaea, and 0.27% (47 ha) as calcareous dwarf sedge communities Caricion davallianae (Kabucis et al., 2003).

Dry calcareous grasslands belong to the class of sub-continental dry grasslands Festuco-Brometea Br.-Bl. et Tiixen ex Soo 1947 being one of the most species-rich vegetation types in Europe, hereto rich in rare, protected plant species (Lobel & Dengler, 2008). Festuco-Brometea communities are found in nutrient-poor, calcareous xeric or mesic soils; usually the sites are exposed to extreme microclimatic conditions such as draught and high temperature amplitudes, which have facilitated the presence of many stress-tolerant species (Schubert, 2001; Janisova, 2007). In Latvia, drier calcareous grasslands belong to the alliance Bromion erecti Koch 1926 with a distribution range falling into West and Central European oceanic and sub-oceanic regions.

In Europe a large proportion of humid calcareous grasslands belong to the alliance Molinion caerulaea Koch 1926 and are found in poorly drained alkaline or acidic to slightly acidic peat or clayey, nutrient-poor soils, predominantly in lowlands with relatively high precipitation, occasionally also in sub-alpine regions (Anon., 1995; Hajkova et al., 2007; Rodwell et al., 2007). Throughout their distribution range Molinion grasslands are endangered, being thus one of the priorities in the conservation of European grassland habitats (Anon., 1995; Hajkova et al., 2007; Reznickova, 2007).

There are few studies on calcareous grasslands in Latvia. Over the last century, calcareous grasslands in Latvia have been classified according to the dominant species method (Sabardina, 1957), which is hardly comparable with the Central European phytosociological approach applied later and used by e.g. Rusina (Rusina, 2003; Rusina, 2007) for xerophytic and mesophytic grasslands. In terms of EU protected habitats, the characteristics and regional variation of dry calcareous grasslands (EU habitat code 6210) and Molinia grasslands on soils with fluctuating water tables (6410) were described also by Rusina (2010) and Rusina & Kabucis (2010).

Although not covering large areas, semi-natural calcareous grassland communities are well represented in Kemeri National Park. The relatively small patches of calcareous vegetation are highly important in order to protect the particular habitat types and the affiliated species.

The aim of this study was to analyse the ecology, phytosociological affiliation, and regional characteristics of and management effects on calcareous grasslands in Kemeri National Park.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was performed in Kemeri National Park (KNP), Latvia, which lies in the contact zone of the Coastal Lowland to the south of the Gulf of Riga and the northern edge of the Zemgale Lowland, 56[degrees]55'14" N, 23[degrees]26'30" E. The area is mostly flat, the average altitude reaches only a few metres above sea level. The soils are formed mainly of Devonian dolomite, dolomite marlstone, and clay bedrocks, moraine clayey material, sandy eolic and alluvial deposits. Large areas are covered by acidic peat soils; in small patches outflows of carbonate-rich spring waters have created specific conditions with carbonate-rich, sulphurous carbonatic peat deposits. The flora of the area contains floristic sub-atlantic elements typical for the Coastal Lowland and West Latvia. The park is very rich in plant species including botanical rarities and is particular with its high habitat diversity (Priede, 2008).

The area is predominantly covered by forests, raised bogs, and lakes. At the end of the 20th century the total area of semi-natural and ameliorated grasslands made up about 7% (2483 ha) of the total area of KNP. The dynamics of the grassland area over the 20th century cannot be precisely detected due to lack of data; however, according to retrospective analysis of cartographic materials (Priede, 2009) the total area of semi-natural grasslands in the mid-20th century may have been about 25% larger than at the beginning of the 21st century. At the beginning of the 21st century calcareous grasslands covered about 118 ha.

The study included mapping and classification of grassland habitats (2007 to 2009) and description of vegetation plots. The grassland areas were calculated on the basis of the orthophoto maps of 2007 using ESRI ArcGIS 9.0 software.

The vegetation was sampled in 2 m x 2 m plots located from each other at a distance of 10 to 20 m along a transect in a randomly chosen direction crossing the grassland patch. Vegetation plots were sampled using the Braun-Blanquet method: all vascular plant species occurring within the plot and their coverage in percentages were taken into account. The approximate area of the grassland where the vegetation plots were described was 80 ha, which covers about 70% of the patches of similar vegetation type in KNP. The location of plots in relation to the distribution of calcareous grasslands is given in Fig. 1.

A total of 181 plots were extracted from a larger grassland vegetation data set (552 releves), where calcareous grasslands were distinguished by two-way indicator species analysis (TWINSPAN; Hill, 1979) on the basis of similarity of species composition and presence of indicator species. Then the selected TWINSPAN group of calcareous grassland plots was classified into vegetation units according to the similarity of species composition. Indirect ordination method DCA (PC-ORD program package; McCune & Mefford, 1999) was applied in analysing the ecological factors. As the explanatory variables the mean Ellenberg values (light, temperature, continentality, moisture, reaction, nitrogen) (Ellenberg et al., 1992) were calculated for each plot and then the mean values for the releve groups were used. The parameters acquired in field (total moss layer, total litter layer, total number of species per releve, and management) were included in the analysis. Independent samples t-test was used for comparing the significance of differences between the mean Ellenberg values of both major vegetation groups.

The classification of vegetation follows the Central European Braun-Blanquet system. The nomenclature for vegetation units is according to Weber et al. (2000). The species nomenclature follows Gavrilova & Sulcs (1999).

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Mapping results

Among the calcareous grasslands the largest areas were covered by Molinion grasslands, while Bromion grasslands were found mainly in small, relatively isolated patches or enclosed as mosaic patches in Molinion grasslands. Therefore the exact areas of these vegetation types could not be determined, and many locations contain elements of both types. About half of the Molinion and Bromion grasslands had representative vegetation, while the rest were partly overgrown or partly transformed into species-poor fen-like moist grasslands, fens, and/or shrublands. The causes of transformation include both abandonment and paludification. Over the period 2006-2009, about 40% of the Molinion and Bromion grasslands in KNP were mown at least once over the 4-year period. Some of the currently managed grasslands were classified as fallows rather than calcareous grasslands several years after cessation of arable cultivation; however, these have a high potential for renaturalization into calcareous grassland communities.

Classification of releves

According to TWINSPAN analysis, the data set was split into two major groups: (1) xerophytic to mesophytic communities of Sesleria caerulea group (128 releves in total); and (2) mesophytic communities with Molinia caerulea or Carex hostiana as dominant species (53 releves in total). Both groups were divided into two sub-units: Sesleria caerulea group into Sesleria caerulea-Bromion and Sesleria caerulea-Molinion subgroups, and Molinia caerulea group into Molinia caerulea and Carex hostiana sub-groups (Fig. 2).

DCA Axis 1 explained 67.7% of variation, Axis 2 43%, and Axis 3 27% of variation. The only statistically significant environmental gradient was moisture, which distinguished Sesleria caerulea and Molinia caerulea groups. Moisture was followed by the total number of species (Fig. 3, Table 1).

Comparison of the mean Ellenberg values in the S. caerulea and M. caerulea groups shows that none of the factors significantly differs between the groups. Both groups are found on moderately warm, neutral to slightly acidic, nutrient-poor soils with little variations in the mean Ellenberg values except that the S. caerulea group occurs on slightly drier soils than the M. caerulea group (Table 2).

Comparison of species richness among the four sub-groups shows that the S. caerulea group is constantly richer in species than the M. caerulea group. The recent management has not directly affected the present species richness and vegetation structure at community level (Table 3).

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

Sesleria caerulea group

Most commonly, S. caerulea communities occurred on shallow mineral soils, less frequently on peaty soils, rarely on rendzina soils with gravelly dolomite admixture. Xerophytic to mesophytic communities belonging to the S. caerulea group were the richest in species. The total number of species per releve varied from 7 in abandoned, considerably overgrown sites to 37 in managed sites per 4 [m.sup.2]. The vegetation was differentiated into two layers; the sward was typically dense and medium low. The moss layer was absent or its cover was very small.

The S. caerulea group was rather variable in species composition and ecological conditions, and contained character species of several vegetation classes and lower syntaxonomical units. The group was largely formed by mesophytic grassland species belonging to the class Molinio-Arrhenatheretea R. Tx. 1937, order Arrhenatheretalia R. Tx. 1937, less frequently accompanied by character species of the orders Calthion palustris R. Tx. 1937 and Deschampsion cespitosae Horvatic 1930. The group was dominated by species of mesophytic to hygrophytic grassland communities of the alliance Molinietalia caerulaea Koch 1926 and xerophytic to mesophytic continental calcareous grassland species of the class Festuco-Brometea, rarely accompanied by species of forest edge communities of Trifolio-Geranietea T. Muller 1961 (Appendix).

Syntaxonomy of Sesleria caerulea grasslands

The S. caerulea group belongs to the alliances Bromion (Festuco-Brometea) and Molinion (Molinio-Arrhenatheretea). The affiliation to lower syntaxonomical units is disputable, since they contain character species of both vegetation classes and associated lower syntaxonomical units (orders, alliances). Affiliation to Festuco-Brometea or Molinio-Arrhenatheretea was based on presence/absence of the character species in the TWINSPAN division. The communities were named after two dominant differential species.

The proposed syntaxonomy of the S. caerulea group is as follows: Class Festuco-Brometea Br.-Bl. et Tuxen ex Soo 1947

Order Brometalia erecti Br.-Bl. 1936

Alliance Bromion erecti Koch 1926

Sesleria caerulea-Primula veris community (25 releves, = TWINSPAN Sesleria caerulea-Bromion sub-group)

Class Molinio-Arrhenatheretea R. Tx. 1937

Order Molietalia Koch 1926

Alliance Eu-Molinion Koch em. Passarge 1964

Sesleria caerulea-Inula salicina community (103 releves, = TWINSPAN Sesleria caerulea-Molinion sub-group)

The S. caerulea-P. veris community (Bromion) differs from the moister S. Caerulea-I. salicina community (Molinion) in including several xerophytes and mesoxerophytes, e.g., Primula veris, Polygala comosa, Carlina vulgaris, Agrimonia eupatoria. The moister S. caerulea-I. salicina community (Molinion) has a high frequency of Succisa pratensis, Galium boreale, Inula salicina, and Geum rivale, which are absent or very rare in the S. Caerulea-P. veris community.

Both S. caerulea communities are variable due to microhabitat conditions. Patches with S. caerulea as a co-dominant species along with Carex flacca and/or C. hostiana and other character species of Molinion were found. In such cases, along with natural succession the role of Molinia caerulea increases. In sites with well-pronounced dominance of S. caerulea and a small number of accompanying species the species composition can be perhaps explained by overgrowing and impoverishment of the vegetation structure and species composition.

A polydominant mesophytic community with S. caerulea as a co-dominant or frequent accompanying species of the alliance Calthion or absence of S. caerulea were found in moister sites. Along with natural succession, in moister depressions the role of Filipendula ulmaria increased, on drier elevations Festuca arundinacea could prevail. Rarely the cover of Deschampsia cespitosa increased at abandoned sites. In drier conditions S. caerulea was a co-dominant species along with mesophytic grass species of Arrhenateretalia, e.g., Helictotrichon pubescens, Festuca pratensis, Briza media. Constant accompanying species of Molinion and Festuco-Brometea formed a small proportion in the community. On dry forest edges and partly overgrown grasslands the community was usually polydominant with S. caerulea as an accompanying species or S. caerulea was absent. Several character species of Trifolio-Geranietea were present.

Both communities in the S. caerulea group in KNP were somewhat similar to the Filipendula vulgaris-Helictotrichon pratense association and its caricetum flaccae sub-association described by Rusina (2007). The typical sub-association of Filipendula vulgaris-Helictotrichon pratense was not present in the study area, and the typical character species Helictotrichon pratense, Filipendula vulgaris, and Fragaria viridis were very rare. The ecological conditions of the S. caerulea community in KNP and the communities of the Filipendula vulgaris-Helictotrichon pratense association described by Rusina (2007) mostly in West and Central Latvia were rather similar except for moisture, which was notably lower in the communities described by Rusina (2007). The communities described by Rusina (2007) are drier and contain more species of Festuco-Brometea, while S. caerulea grasslands in KNP were richer in species of Molinion; besides, most of the typical Filipendula vulgaris-Helictotrichon pratense grasslands are located on slopes of river valleys on drier, well-drained soils than those in the lowland with often poorly drained soils in KNP.

Using the dominant species method, Sabardina (1957) separated 16 seminatural grassland associations with S. caerulea in Latvia occurring in various moisture conditions varying from wet fens and fen-like grasslands to extremely dry soils (Dite et al., 2007; Rusina, 2007) and thus proving the high tolerance of S. caerulea for different levels of moisture in soils. Although S. caerulea is an excellent indicator of carbonates in soil, its high tolerance for moisture conditions does not allow its use as a differentiating species in classification of plant communities.

Central European dry calcareous grassland associations of Festuco-Brometea are found mainly on dry rendzina soils and are basically formed of continental and sub-continental species (Chytry et al., 2007; Skodova, 2007; Molnar et al., 2008), from which many are absent in Latvia. The S. caerulea communities in KNP resemble more alvar grasslands of Estonia and Swedish islands (Partel et al., 1999; Rosen, 2006); however, the communities in KNP differ in having deeper soils, less extreme climate conditions, lower species richness, lack of endemic species, and different land use history.

In KNP, the moistest types of grassland communities of the S. caerulea group are somewhat similar to those of Central European calcareous fens with S. caerulea as a dominant species belonging to the association Seslerietum uliginosae Klika 1934 (class Scheuchzerio-Carietea nigrae (Nordh. 1937) R. Tx. 1937, order Caricetalia davalliana Br.-Bl. 1949, alliance Caricion davallianae Klika 1934). However, a peculiarity of fen communities is moister soils and perhaps also different bedrock, while the described S. caerulea communities in KNP occur on dry to moderately moist soils, rarely on soils with fluctuating water tables, and therefore are accompanied by mesophytes.

Xerophytic grasslands with S. caerulea as a dominant or co-dominant species with a large proportion of sub-continental xerophytic or mesoxerophytic species were rare in KNP and occurred only as small patches. Their distribution pattern was largely defined by varying small-scale micro-relief conditions, while communities where species of the comparatively moister Molinion species prevailed were more widespread.

The S. caerulea communities with dry forest edge species of Trifolio-Geranietea covered small patches in dry, sunny sites along the forest-grassland edges and often contained several forest edge species such as Agrimonia eupatoria, Trifolium medium, Origanum vulgare, Melampyrum nemorosum, Solidago virgaurea.

Management of Sesleria caerulea grasslands

Currently management measures are applied to a small part of the S. caerulea grasslands. The majority of these localities are found in the surroundings of villages, which were formerly regularly used both as hay meadows and pastures. Some of the S. caerulea grasslands occur in distant areas surrounded by forests and were used as hay meadows in the past, perhaps half a century ago. Over the last 50 years, the degree of isolation of the forest meadows has significantly increased. In the period of the survey (2007-2009) mowing was applied in three meadows only, while the last pasture was abandoned around 2000. As suggested by the known history of the grassland management in KNP, regular grass cutting with removal of litter, preferably once a year or once every two years, has to be assured to maintain the grasslands rich in species. Mixed cutting-moderate grazing management is acceptable.

Effects of abandonment in Sesleria caerulea grasslands

The species composition and community structure in both S. caerulea communities were in many cases associated with management history and intensity over the last decades. As a result of succession, the vegetation structure became poorer: a well-pronounced vegetation layer consisting of expansive grasses and herbs developed, while the lower layer with low dicotyledons was poorly represented and the species richness had significantly decreased. The low, light-demanding species vanished as they became suppressed by the tall grasses and herbs. The maximum species richness per 4 [m.sup.2] was 37 species, while in later successional stages in abandoned grasslands the number of species per plot reached only 7 or even fewer species per 4 [m.sup.2], although the species-poorest grasslands not containing any character species were not classified under any groups of calcareous grassland vegetation and therefore were not included in the analysis. Contrary to the observed effects of abandonment in field, in the described plots the species richness at abandoned and mown sites did not differ significantly. In the Sesleria caerulea-Primula veris community the species richness was even higher at the abandoned sites than at the mown sites (Table 3).

In both S. caerulea communities some expansive species, e.g., Calamagrostis epigeios, Festuca arundinacea, Brachypodium pinnatum, and Inula salicina appeared to be good indicators of abandonment. In dry forest edges some species of Trifolio-Geranietea indicated natural transformation towards forest communities, e.g., Trifolium medium and Agrimonia eupatoria were often accompanied by C. epigeios and thus outcompeting the low, light-demanding species. While in drier sites the transformation was well represented by the expansion of C. epigeios, I. salicina, and F. arundinacea, in moister locations some Calthion and Deschampsion species might occur, e.g., Filipendula ulmaria, Deschampsia cespitosa, Geum rivale, and Phragmites australis.

In West and Central Europe, and also in Estonian and Swedish calcareous dry grasslands, expansion of Brachypodium pinnatum due to abandonment is reported (e.g., Bobbink & Willems, 1993; Hurst & John, 1999; Butaye et al., 2005), indicating a successional phase between open grassland and forest stage (Rusina, 2007). In the study area the dominance of B. pinnatum was just fragmentary in small patches at abandoned forest-grassland edges. In Central and West Europe expansion of B. pinnatum is associated not only with abandonment, but also with large airborne deposits of nitrogen (Hurst & John, 1999), which is not a priority cause in Latvia.

As suggested by the results of many grassland restoration trials in European calcareous grasslands (Willems & Bik, 1998; Von Blanchenhagen & Poschlod, 2005), if appropriate preconditions such as rich soil seed bank, propagule sources in the vicinity, and suitable soil conditions exist, grassland restoration might be successful. Re-establishment of mowing in calcareous grasslands has given promising results also in KNP, although the current management, mowing and mulching the cut grass, does not exactly imitate the traditionally practised haymaking with biomass removal. Mulching does not decrease nutrients in soil and litter, therefore it is not sustainable in the management and restoration of semi-natural grassland communities (Rusina, 2008).

The overgrowing of S. caerulea grasslands leads to the pre-forest phase with an expansion of several tree and shrub species, most commonly Frangula alnus, Betula pubescens, and B. pendula, various Salix species, and on drier sites Pinus sylvestris. On moister sites, Lonicera caerulea subsp. pallasii is rarely present as a co-dominant species. Seldom expansion of Juniperus communis was observed on drier sites, where they sometimes formed J. communis-dominated shrublands, although they covered small areas. Some of the dry calcareous S. caerulea grasslands were afforested with Picea abies in the 1970s, currently forming dense stands with very sparse or without any vegetation cover.

Some abandoned forest hay meadows were still very rich in indicator species and contained many rare species. Mowing ceased at least 50 years ago, yet grasslands still existed as open patches with high species richness. Similar results were obtained by Reriha & Rusina (2009) in Slitere National Park in North-West Latvia, who found up to 50 species per 1 [m.sup.2] in a partly overgrown calcareous grassland massif. Although the species richness in forest hay meadows in KNP was comparatively lower (up to 37 species per 4 [m.sup.2]), in both cases probably wild large herbivores play an important role in maintaining the open patches.

Reference to EU-level protected habitats of Sesleria caerulea grasslands

The majority of the studied grasslands were classified as habitat 6410 Molinia meadows on calcareous, peaty or clayey-silt-laden soils (European Commission, 2007). The driest calcareous grasslands with the highest proportion of Festuco-Brometea species were classified as 6210 Semi-natural dry grasslands and scrubland facies on calcareous substrates.

Molinia caerulea group

Molinia caerulea grasslands lie on shallow peat soils formed on low-permeable dolomite bedrock. The soils are seasonally flooded, while in summers they might dry out. The local moisture conditions depend also on the micro-relief. These grasslands were rarer in the study area but less fragmented than Sesleria caerulea communities. Compared to the S. caerulea group, M. caerulea grasslands were comparatively species-poorer and less variable (Table 3, Appendix).

In the M. caerulea sub-group the number of species per 4 [m.sup.2] varied from 6 to 25. The vegetation was usually structured in one or two layers, sometimes with different flowering periods, e.g., Viola uliginosa formed the flowering cover in late spring, while the majority of taller plants bloomed in late summer, creating shade and thus not allowing full development of lower herbs.

The Carex hostiana community was separated as a sub-group differing in ecological conditions and consequently also in species composition (Appendix). This sub-group was peculiar with relatively low species richness (9 to 19 species per 4 [m.sup.2] plot). The vegetation structure was similar to the M. caerulea sub-group. Calcareous grassland communities with C. hostiana as a dominant or co-dominant species were rarely found also on mesic carbonate-rich soils or soils with a fluctuating water table, although in such cases mesophytic to hygrophytic species of Calthion were not present or were rare.

According to mean Ellenberg values, the soils under the C. hostiana subgroup were slightly more acidic and moister than those of the M. caerulea subgroup (Table 2). Probably the dominance of C. hostiana is promoted by a higher water table and/or differences in management regimes, respectively, the succession stage (Rusina & Kabucis, 2010).

Syntaxonomy of Molinia caerulea grasslands

The M. caerulea group belongs to the class Molinio-Arrhenatheretea, order Molinietalia, alliance Molinion. This alliance is commonly divided into two groups (Mucina et al., 1993). The Molinia caerulea sub-goup belongs to Eu-Molinion Koch em. Passarge 1964, the association Molinietum caeruleae Koch 1926. The species-poorer C. hostiana sub-group in moister and slightly more acidic soils coincides with the higher syntaxonomical unit at the alliance level Junco-Molinion Korneck ex Passarge 1964.

The proposed syntaxonomy of the M. caerulea group is as follows:

Class Molinio-Arrhenatheretea R. Tx. 1937

Order Molietalia Koch 1926

Alliance Eu-Molinion Koch em. Passarge 1964

Association Molinietum caeruleae Koch 1926 (38 releves, = TWINSPAN Molinia caerulea sub-group)

Alliance Junco-Molinion Korneck ex Passarge 1964

Carex hostiana community (15 releves, = TWINSPAN Carex hostiana sub-group)

In Molinietum caeruleae in KNP some Festuco-Brometea species were present, while they were absent in the moister Carex hostiana community. Typical species in Molinietum caeruleae, Galium boreale and Inula salicina, were absent or very rare in the Carex hostiana community.

In both communities the ecological conditions were often similar to those of fens on shallow peat soils; sometimes transitional moist to wet grassland-fen communities could be found. Both in the M. caerulea and S. caerulea communities species of alkaline fens belonging to the class Scheuchzerio-Carietea nigrae, order Caricetalia davalliana, alliance Caricion davallianae, e.g., Eriophorum latifolium, Primula farinosa, Carex flava, Schoenus ferrugineus, and Epipactis palustris were rather frequent. Also S. caerulea, a co-dominant or an accompanying species, was rather frequent as it is tolerant of various moisture conditions.

Additionally, some species of other classes or lower syntaxonomical units of fen communities (e.g., Caricion lasiocarpae Van den Berghen ap. Lebrun et al. 1949 and Magnocaricion elatae Koch 1926) were present. As a regional peculiarity, high frequency of species typical for West and West-coastal Latvia--Viola uliginosa and Myrica gale--should be mentioned. Some of the frequent species such as Carex hostiana, C. flacca, Ononis arvensis, and Cirsium acaule are rather frequent in West Latvia, but rare or absent in other regions of the country (Fatare, 1992).

Management of Molinia caerulea grasslands

Formerly, M. caerulea grasslands were commonly utilized as hay meadows, pastures, or mixed mowing-late summer grazing management was applied. Only a few M. caerulea grasslands have been managed in recent years by mulching. In order to maintain the M. caerulea grasslands open and species-rich, preferably cutting once a year or once every two years with hay removal or mixed cutting-moderate grazing should be applied.

Effects of abandonment of Molinia caerulea grasslands

No significant differences were found in the species richness at mown and abandoned sites (Table 3). Due to overgrowing the dominance of M. caerulea increases, therefore it is a good indicator of transformation processes affecting the vegetation structure. Along with natural succession of the community the nutrients are being accumulated in the root system allowing M. caerulea becoming a dominant species (Mucina et al., 1993). Such grasslands are characteristic with low species richness and hummocky micro-relief.

In some cases, Carex buxbaumii expands in abandoned grasslands, although this species is rare in Latvia, including the study area. In moister sites Carex lasiocarpa and C. elata increase accompanied by the expansion of Phragmites australis. Hydrological changes sometimes result in a spread of the Calamagrostis canescens cover, indicating paludification. In a Carex hostiana community, the cover of some tall herbs such as Eupatorium cannabium and Senecio paludosus may increase.

In KNP abandonment has led to an expansion of Myrica gale shrublands, which syntaxonomically belong to the Myricetum gale Jonas 1932 association. The M. gale shrublands are a successional pre-forest stage, followed by a proliferation of higher woody species, e.g., Frangula alnus, Salix aurita, S. cinerea, Betula pubescens, Alnus glutinosa, and Lonicera caerulea subsp. pallasii. The last species is typical for coastal areas only.

Abandonment and perhaps also the currently practised mulching lead to accumulation of litter, thus diminishing germination of light-demanding species and increasing the fire hazard. Fires increase the aboveground biomass, seed production, and germinability of M. caerulea (Brys et al., 2005), promoting its dominance. Irregular grass burning at the end of the 20th century and at the beginning of the 21st century has affected few M. caerulea grasslands in KNP, although the possible effects are controversial and cannot be unambiguously judged as negative. The effects of burning at a community level are not documented; however, it has evidently maintained the open landscape without dense shrublands, while as negative effects increased dominance of M. caerulea and formation of hummocks should be mentioned. Since the burned areas are frequently inundated in spring floods, the dead litter does not form a thick layer.

Irregular cutting of M. gale shrubs does not significantly change the community structure and composition, since the shrubs are able to regenerate in a few years, while cutting may significantly decrease the dominance of shrubs and offsprings of Salix and Betula spp.

Reference to EU-level protected habitats of the Molinia caerulea group

All grasslands belonging to the M. caerulea group are classified as habitat 6410 Molinia meadows on calcareous, peaty, or clayey-silt-laden soils (European Commission, 2007).

Representativity of the results on a national scale

The results should not be generalized as representing the whole territory of Latvia, although the species composition and vegetation structure can be extrapolated to grasslands in similar environmental conditions in most of the Coastal Lowland and West Latvia. The species composition of calcareous grasslands in Latvia varies also due to an uneven regional distribution of quite numerous character species; for example, many of them are common in West Latvia, but absent or very rare in Central and East Latvia. Nevertheless, the main natural transformation processes are similar throughout the country and the whole region reflects the tendencies of changes in biodiversity closely related to altering lifestyles of inhabitants and agricultural practices.

Conservation aspects

According to Rusina (2010), dry calcareous grassland habitats (EU code 6210) cover about 0.02% of the territory of Latvia, while Molinia grasslands (EU code 6410) cover 0.015% of the country (Rusina & Kabucis, 2010). The estimated numbers illustrate the low frequency and bad conservation status of both these habitat types in Latvia. These grassland communities and relevant ecological conditions are rarely and fragmentarily found throughout Latvia. The distribution pattern largely coincides with river valleys and the Coastal Lowland (Rusina, 2010). In KNP dry calcareous grassland communities are very rare, while more mesophytic calcareous contact communities of Molinion and Bromion are more widely distributed. According to a rough estimate, Molinion grasslands in KNP make up about 12% of the total cover of this habitat in Latvia.

Calcareous grasslands in KNP contain many Red List species. Along with the declining cover of calcareous grasslands and fens, the distribution of Sesleria caerulea is shrinking (Medene, 2009; Reriha & Rusina, 2009). In KNP some species associated to calcareous grasslands are present also in some derivate communities on roadsides on carbonate-rich substrates. Although not representing the community structure of semi-natural grasslands, they are important regarding the species migration and connectivity of habitats, particularly in a situation when semi-natural grasslands are becoming more and more isolated (Adriaens et al., 2006).

In KNP in some cases grassland habitats can naturally transform into other threatened and rare vegetation types; for example, Molinia caerulea communities transform into Myrica gale shrubland. However, considering the rapid decline of semi-natural grasslands, conservation of those threatened communities should be considered as priority instead of preserving a pre-forest shrubland successional phase.

According to analysis of historical maps from the early and mid-20th century, a considerable proportion of today's semi-natural grasslands in KNP with high species richness were previously utilized as temporary arable lands (Priede, 2009). In species- and community-rich regions with good connectivity of semi-natural grasslands plowing of grasslands and temporary use as arable lands without significant changes in the soil nutrient level need not significantly decrease the regional species pool. Therefore fragmentary plowing can be accepted as appropriate land use if the soils are not intensively fertilized or ameliorated.

Studies by Kalamees & Zobel (1998) in Estonian semi-natural grasslands show that a relatively rich soil seed bank may persist several decades after abandonment or afforestation allowing successful grassland restoration. Similar conclusions can be derived from studies by Blanckenhagen & Poschlod (2005) in Belgium. However, Kalamees & Zobel (1997) found that the number of species and seeds in the seed bank significantly decline from managed grasslands to closed overgrown community. Similarly, a study by Rosen (2006) in Swedish alvars shows that the soil seed bank in abandoned overgrown calcareous grasslands is significantly reduced and contains widespread grassland species, while the specialist species have vanished. The richness of the soil seed bank does not always play a crucial role in conditions with a high degree of habitat isolation. Grassland connectivity and presence of species-rich grasslands in the neighbourhood are equally important in the restoration of heavily overgrown grasslands. The possibility of restoration, taking into account the above-mentioned preconditions, is still high in KNP. Species richness and its preservation in calcareous grasslands are related to regular management (e.g. Aavik et al., 2008), therefore continuous management, preferably mowing with hay removal or mixed mowing-moderate grazing regimes should be applied in order to keep the semi-natural calcareous grasslands species-rich and diverse.

APPENDIX
SYNOPTIC TABLE (NUMBER OF SPECIES OCCURRENCES
PER GROUP)

                                      Sesleria         Sesleria
                                      caerulea-     caerulea-Inula
                                    Primula veris      salicina
                                      community       community
                                      (Bromion)       (Molinion)

Number of releves                        25              103
Mean number of species per releve       21.6             16.7
Total number of species                  50               92

Class Molinio-Arrhenatheretea

Achillea millefolium                     76               45
Centaurea jacea                          52               60
Dactylis glomerata                       52               23
Festuca pratensis                        16               24
Lathyrus pratensis                       28               49
Phleum pratense                          12               8
Plantago lanceolata                      56               14
Poa pratensis                            36               31
Prunella vulgaris                         4               13
Ranunculus acris                          8               33
Trifolium pratense                       28               12
Vicia cracca                             56               63

Order Arrhenatheretalia

Anthoxanthum odoratum                     4               11
Galium album                             52               45
Heracleum sibiricum                      12               4
Leucanthemum vulgare                     12               9
Lotus corniculatus                       16               7

Order Molinietalia

Angelica sylvestris                       .               9
Cirsium oleraceum                         .               5
Cirsium palustre                          .               7
Deschampsia cespitosa                     .               10
Equisetum palustre                        .               8
Filipendula ulmaria                       .               26
Galium uliginosum                         .               2
Lathyrus palustris                        .               9
Selinum carvifolia                        4               28
Valeriana officinalis                     .               7

Alliance Molinion

Carex flacca                             76               80
Carex panicea                             8               35
Galium boreale                           24               69
Inula salicina                           24               56
Molinia caerulea                          .               18
Potentilla erecta                         8               66
Sesleria caerulea                        48               87
Succisa pratensis                         .               35

Alliance Calthion

Caltha palustris                          .               .
Geum rivale                               4               47
Lysimachia vulgaris                       .               4

Alliance Arrhenatherion

Helictotrichon pubescens                 52               38

Alliance Cynosurion

Briza media                              92               54
Festuca rubra                            68               23

Class Scheuchzerio-Caricetum
  nigrae
Order Caricetala nigrae

Carex lasiocarpa                          .               .
Carex nigra                               .               1
Comarum palustre                          .               .
Primula farinosa                          .               5

Alliance Caricion davallianae

Carex hostiana                            .               16
Epipactis palustris                       8               19

Class Festuco-Brometea

Anthylis vulneraria s.l.                 36               1
Centaurea scabiosa                       60               2
Campanula glomerata                      12               11
Carlina vulgaris                         32               5
Poygala comosa                           45               7
Order Bromion erecti                      .               .
Carex ornithopoda                         8               9
Cirsium acaule                           16               9
Gymnadenia conopsea                       8               8
Leontodon hispidus                       40               11
Linum catharticum                        24               5
Ononis arvensis                          68               28
Ophioglossum vulgatum                    16               22
Pimpinella saxifraga                     80               31
Plantago media                           44               12
Primula veris                            84               15
Trifolium montanum                       32               8

Class Trifolio-Geranietea

Agrimonia eupatoria                      52               4
Origanum vulgare                         16               1
Solidago virgaurea                       36               .
Trifolium medium                         16               1

Class Phragmito-Magnocaricetea

Lythrum salicaria                         .               1
Phragmites australis                      .               3

Alliance Magnocaricion elatae
                                          .               .
Carex buxbaumii                           .               .
Peucedanum palustre                       .               .
Other species                             .               .
Aegopodium podagraria                     .               5
Alchemilla vulgaris s.l.                 24               27
Betula pubescens                          .               7
Calamagrostis epigeios                   56               46
Campanula rapunculoides                  20               3
Carex flava                               .               .
Carex hirta                               .               5
Equisetum pratense                        8               17
Eupatorium cannabium                      .               .
Festuca arundinacea                      52               35
Festuca ovina                             4               5
Frangula alnus                            .               4
Hepatica nobilis                          4               4
Knautia arvensis                         44               6
Listera ovata                             .               12
Luzula multiflora                        16               12
Medicago lupulina                        32               12
Melampyrum nemorosum                     36               12
Myrica gale                               .               .
Pinus sylvestris                          .               5
Potentilla anserina                       4               8
Ranunculus auricomus                      .               13
Ranunculus polyanthemos                  24               10
Rumex acetosa                            12               15
Salix aurita                              .               4
Scorzonera humilis                        .               5
Veronica chamaedrys                      32               25
Viola uliginosa                           .               3

                                    Molinietum     Carex
                                    caeruleae     hostiana
                                    community    community
                                    (Molinion)   (Molinion)

Number of releves                       38           15
Mean number of species per releve       12          12.7
Total number of species                 66           33

Class Molinio-Arrhenatheretea

Achillea millefolium                    5            .
Centaurea jacea                         5            .
Dactylis glomerata                                   .
Festuca pratensis                       5            20
Lathyrus pratensis                      11           13
Phleum pratense                         .            .
Plantago lanceolata                     .            .
Poa pratensis                           .            .
Prunella vulgaris                       .            .
Ranunculus acris                        8            20
Trifolium pratense                      3            .
Vicia cracca                            16           .

Order Arrhenatheretalia

Anthoxanthum odoratum                   .            .
Galium album                            3            .
Heracleum sibiricum                     .            .
Leucanthemum vulgare                    3            .
Lotus corniculatus                      5            .

Order Molinietalia

Angelica sylvestris                     16           13
Cirsium oleraceum                       .            20
Cirsium palustre                        16           53
Deschampsia cespitosa                   .            60
Equisetum palustre                      24           67
Filipendula ulmaria                     68           73
Galium uliginosum                       32           53
Lathyrus palustris                      39           .
Selinum carvifolia                      16           13
Valeriana officinalis                   11           27

Alliance Molinion

Carex flacca                            50           .
Carex panicea                           29           80
Galium boreale                          37           7
Inula salicina                          32           .
Molinia caerulea                       100           7
Potentilla erecta                       76           80
Sesleria caerulea                       58           73
Succisa pratensis                       42           33

Alliance Calthion

Caltha palustris                        .            53
Geum rivale                             3            33
Lysimachia vulgaris                     26           47

Alliance Arrhenatherion

Helictotrichon pubescens                .            .

Alliance Cynosurion

Briza media                             13           27
Festuca rubra                           .            .

Class Scheuchzerio-Caricetum
  nigrae
Order Caricetala nigrae

Carex lasiocarpa                        13           .
Carex nigra                             .            40
Comarum palustre                        13           13
Primula farinosa                        .            .

Alliance Caricion davallianae

Carex hostiana                          .            67
Epipactis palustris                     13           13

Class Festuco-Brometea

Anthylis vulneraria s.l.                3            .
Centaurea scabiosa                      .            .
Campanula glomerata                     3            .
Carlina vulgaris                        3            .
Poygala comosa                          3            .
Order Bromion erecti                    .            .
Carex ornithopoda                       .            .
Cirsium acaule                          3            .
Gymnadenia conopsea                     5            .
Leontodon hispidus                      .            .
Linum catharticum                       3            .
Ononis arvensis                         5            .
Ophioglossum vulgatum                   3            .
Pimpinella saxifraga                    8            .
Plantago media                          .            .
Primula veris                           3            .
Trifolium montanum                      3            .

Class Trifolio-Geranietea

Agrimonia eupatoria                     .            .
Origanum vulgare                        .            .
Solidago virgaurea                      .            .
Trifolium medium                        .            .

Class Phragmito-Magnocaricetea

Lythrum salicaria                       34           .
Phragmites australis                    8            .

Alliance Magnocaricion elatae

Carex buxbaumii                         11           .
Peucedanum palustre                     39           .
Other species                           .            .
Aegopodium podagraria                   .            .
Alchemilla vulgaris s.l.                .            .
Betula pubescens                        5            .
Calamagrostis epigeios                  8            .
Campanula rapunculoides                 .            .
Carex flava                             3            .
Carex hirta                             .            .
Equisetum pratense                      3            7
Eupatorium cannabium                    5            33
Festuca arundinacea                     .            .
Festuca ovina                           3            .
Frangula alnus                          11           .
Hepatica nobilis                        .            .
Knautia arvensis                        .            .
Listera ovata                           3            .
Luzula multiflora                       3            13
Medicago lupulina                       .            .
Melampyrum nemorosum                    3            .
Myrica gale                             24           .
Pinus sylvestris                        3            .
Potentilla anserina                     3            20
Ranunculus auricomus                    3            13
Ranunculus polyanthemos                 .            .
Rumex acetosa                           .            7
Salix aurita                            13           .
Scorzonera humilis                      3            .
Veronica chamaedrys                     .            .
Viola uliginosa                         37           .


Rare species (with less than 2 occurrences per TWINSPAN group). Abbreviations used: SB--Sesleria caerulea-Primula veris community; SM--Sesleria caerulea-Inula salicina community; CM--Carex hostiana community; MM -Molinietum caeruleae community.

Agrostis stonolifera (MM), Agrostis tenuis (SM, MM), Alnus incana (SM), Arrhenatherum elatius (SM), Artemisia campestris (SB), Astragalus glycyphyllos (SB), Bella perennis (SM), Brachypodium pinnatum (SB), Calamagrostis arundinacea (MM), Calamagrostis canescens (MM), Carex capillaris (SB, CM), Carex caryophyllea (SB), Carex diandra (MM), Carex elata (MM), Carex lepidocarpa (CM, MM), Carex pallescens (SM), Carex sylvatica (MM), Carex vesicaria (MM), Carum carvi (SB), Cerastium holosteoides (SB, SM), Cirsium arvense (SB), Clinopodium vulgare (MM), Convallaria majalis (CM), Convolvulus arvensis (MM), Dactylorhiza baltica (SM), Dactylorhiza fuchsii (CM), Dactylorhiza incarnata (SM, CM, MM), Dactylorhiza maculata (CM), Daucus carota (SB), Elytrigia repens (SB), Equisetum variegatum (MM), Eriophorum latifolium (CM, MM), Fragaria vesca (SB), Galium palustre (SM, MM), Geranium palustre (SM, MM), Geranium pratense (SM), Glechoma hederacea (SM), Hieracium sp. (SM), Hierochloe odorata (MM), Holcus lanatus (SM), Hypericum perforatum (SB, SM), Juncus articulatus (CM, MM), Leontodon autumnalis (SM, CM), Luzula campestris (SM), Lychnis flos-cuculi (SM), Lycopus europaeus (MM), Lysimachia nummularia (SM, MM), Melica nutans (SM), Melilotus officinalis (SB), Mentha aquatica (CM, MM), Orchis mascula (MM), Parnassia palustris (CM, MM), Picea abies (SM), Pilosella officinarum (SB, SM), Poa compressa (SM), Poa palustre (MM), Polemonium caeruleum (SM), Populus tremula (SM), Potentilla reptans (SB), Quercus robur (SM), Ranunculus repens (SM), Rhamnus cathartica (SB), Rubus caesius (SB, SM), Rubus saxatilis (SM, CM), Salix purpurea (SM), Schoenus ferrigineus (MM), Scutellaria galericulata (SM, CM), Senecio paludosus (MM), Sieglingia decumbens (SM, CM), Taraxacum officinale (SB, SM), Thalictrum aquilegifolium (SM), Thalictrum flavum (SM, MM), Thalictrum lucidum (MM), Thelypteris palustris (MM), Thymus ovatus (SB, SM), Thymus serphyllum (SM), Tragopogon pratensis (SB), Trifolium repens (SB, SM), Triglochin palustris (MM), Trollius europaeus (SM), Tussilago farfara (SB, SM), Veronica longifolia (MM), Veronica officinalis (SM), Vicia sepium (SM), Vicia tetrasperma (SB, SM), Viola mirabilis (SM).

doi: 10.3176/eco.2011.4.03

REFERENCES

Aavik, T., Jogar, U., Liira, J., Tulva, I. & Zobel, M. 2008. Plant diversity in a calcareous wooded meadow--the significance of management continuity. J. Veg. Sci., 19(4), 475-184.

Adriaens, D., Honnay, O. & Hermy, M. 2006. No evidence of a plant extinction debt in highly fragmented calcareous grasslands in Belgium. Biol. Conserv., 133, 212-224.

Anon., 1995. Purple moor grass and rush pastures. UK Biodiversity Action Plan. In Biodiversity: The UK Steering Group Report. Volume II: Action Plans. Tranche, 1(2), 253.

Blanckenhagen, B. von & Poschlod, P. 2005. Restoration of calcareous grasslands: the role of the soil seed bank and seed dispersal for recolonization process. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ., 9(2), 143-149.

Bobbink, R. & Willems, J. H. 1993. Restoration management of abandoned chalk grassland in the Netherlands. Biodivers. Conserv., 2(6), 616-626.

Brys, R., Jacquemyn, H. & De Blust, G. 2005. Fire increases aboveground biomass, seed production and recruitment success of Molinia caerulea in dry heathland. Acta Oecol., 28, 299-305.

Butaye, J., Honnay, O., Adriaens, D., Delescaille, L.-M. & Hermy, M. 2005. Phytosociology and phytogeography of the calcareous grasslands on Devonian limestone in southwest Belgium. Belg. J. Bot., 138(1), 24-38.

Chytry, M., Hoffmann, A. & Novak, J. 2007. Suche travinky (Festuco-Brometea) [Dry grasslands (Festuco-Brometea)]. In Vegetace Ceske republiky. Travinnd a kerickova vegetace (Chytry, M., ed.), pp. 371-470. Academia, Praha (in Czech with English summary).

Dite, D., Hajek, M. & Hajkova, P. 2007. Formal definitions of Slovakian mire plant associations and their application in regional research. Biologia, 62(4), 400-408.

Ellenberg, H., Ruprecht, D., Volkmar, W., Willy, W. & Dirk, P. 1992. Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scripta Geobot., 18, 1-258.

European Commission. 2007. Interpretation Manual of European Union Habitats. EUR 27. European Commission, DG Environment.

Fatare, I. 1992. Latvijas floras komponentu izplatibas analize un tas nozime augu sugu aizsardzibas koncepcijas izstradasana [The Study of Distribution of Latvian Autochtonous Floral Components and Its Importance in Developing a Conception on Plant Species Protection]. LR Vides aizsardzibas komiteja, Petijumu centrs, Riga (in Latvian with English summary).

Gavrilova, Q. & Sulcs, V. 1999. Latvijas vaskularo augu flora. Taksonu saraksts [Checklist of Latvian Vascular Plant Species]. Latvijas Akademiska biblioteka, Riga (in Latvian).

Hajkova, P., Hajek, M., Blazkova, D., Kucera, T., Chytry, M., Reznickova, M., Sumberova, K., Cerny, T., Novak, J. & Simonova, D. 2007. Louky a mezofilni pastviny (Molinio-Arrhenatheretea) [Moderately humid grasslands (Molinio-Arrhenatheretea)]. In Vegetace Ceske republiky. Travinnd a kerickovd vegetace (Chytry, M., ed.), pp. 165-280. Academia, Praha (in Czech with English summary).

Hill, M. O. 1979. TWINSPAN--a FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two way table by classification of the individual and attributes. In Section of Ecology and Systematics. Cornell University, New York.

Hurst, A. & John, E. 1999. The biotic and abiotic changes associated with Brachypodium pinnatum dominance in chalk grassland in south-east England. Biol. Conserv., 88(1), 75-84.

Janisova, M. 2007. Festuco-Brometea Br.-Bl. et Tuxen ex Soo 1947. In Travinnobylinnd vegetdcia Slovenska--elektronicky expertny system na identifikaciu syntaxonov (Janosova, M., ed.), pp. 162-165. Botanicky ustav SAV, Bratislava (in Slovak).

Kabucis, I., Rusina, S. & Veen, P. 2003. Grasslands of Latvia. Status and Conservation of Semi-Natural Grasslands. European grassland report No. 6. Royal Dutch Society for Nature Conservation, Latvian Fund for Nature, Riga.

Kalamees, R. & Zobel, M. 1997. The seed bank in an Estonian calcareous grassland: comparison of different successional stages. Folia Geobot.,

32(1), 1-14.

Kalamees, R. & Zobel, M. 1998. Soil seed bank composition in different successional stages of a species rich wooded meadow in Laelatu, western Estonia. Acta Oecol., 19(2), 175-180.

Lobel, S. & Dengler, J. 2008. Dry grassland communities on southern Oland: phytosociology, ecology, and diversity. ActaPhytogeogr. Suec., 88, 13-31.

McCune, B. & Mefford, M. J. 1999. Multivariate Analysis on the PC-ORD System. Version 4. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA.

Medene, A. 2009. Zilganas seslerijas Sesleria caerulea (L.) Ard izplatiba Latvija [Distribution of Sesleria caerulea (L.) Ard in Latvia]. In Qeogrdfija, Qeologija, Vides zinatne. Latvijas Universitates 67. zinatniska konference, pp. 96-98 (in Latvian).

Molnar, Z., Biro, M., Boloni, J. & Horvath, F. 2008. Distribution of the (semi-)natural habitats in Hungary I. Marshes and grasslands. ActaBot. Hung., 50 (Suppl.), 59-105.

Mucina, L., Grabherr, G. & Ellmauer, G. 1993. Die Pflanzengesellschaften Osterreichs. Teil I. Anthropogene Vegetation. G. Fischer Verlag, Jena, Stuttgart, New York.

Partel, M., Kalamees, R., Zobel, M. & Rosen, E. 1999. Alvar grasslands in Estonia: variation in species composition and community structure. J. Veg. Sci., 10, 561-570.

Priede, A. 2008. Rare vascular plant species in Kemeri National Park (Latvia). In 22nd Expedition of the Baltic Botanists (Daugavpils, Latvia, 14-17 July, 2008), Book of Abstracts, pp. 47-48.

Priede, A. 2009. Changes in natural grassland areas and grassland flora over the 20th century in Kemeri National Park. In 5th International Conference "Research and Conservation of Biological Diversity in Baltic Region", Book of Abstracts, 109.

Reriha, I. & Rusina, S. 2009. Zilgana seslerija Sesleria caerulea (L.) Adr. Sliteres nacionalaja parka [Sesleria caerulea (L.) Ard in Slitere National Park]. In Qeogrdfija, Qeologija, Vides zinatne. Latvijas Universitates 67. zinatniska konference, pp. 116-118. Lavijas Universitate, Riga (in Latvian).

Reznickova, M. 2007. Molinion caeruleae Koch 1926. In Travinnobylinnd vegetdcia Slovenska-elektronicky expertny system na identifikaciu syntaxonov (Janisova, M., ed.), pp. 162-165. Botanicky ustav SAV, Bratislava (in Slovak).

Rodwell, J. S., Morgan, V., Jefferson, R. G. & Moss, D. 2007. The European Context of British Lowland Grasslands. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Report No. 394. JNCC, Petersborough.

Rosen, E. 2006. Alvar vegetation of Oland: changes, monitoring and restoration. Biol. Environ., 106b(2), 387-399.

Rusina, S. 2003. Dry calcareous grassland communities (Filipendula vulgaris-Helicotrichon pratense) in western and central Latvia. Annali di Botanica nouva serie, 3, 91-104.

Rusina, S. 2007. Latvijas mezofito un kserofito zalaju daudzveidiba un kontaktsabiedribas [Diversity and contact communities of mesophytic and xerophyitic grasslands in Latvia]. Latvijas Vegetacija, 12, 1-366 (in Latvian with English summary).

Rusina, S. 2008. Dabisko zalaju apsaimniekosana augaja daudzveidibai [Management of semi-natural grasslands for vegetation diversity]. In Aktudld savvalas sugu un biotopu apsaimniekosanas problematikaLatvija (Aunins, A., ed.), pp. 29-43. Latvijas Universitate, Riga (in Latvian).

Rusina, S. 2010. 6210 Sausi zalaji kalkainas augsnes [6210 Semi-natural dry grasslands and scrubland facies on calcareous substrates]. In Eiropas Savienibas aizsargajamie biotopi Latvija. Noteiksanas rokasgramata (Aunins, A., ed.), pp. 148-151. Latvijas Dabas fonds, Riga (in Latvian).

Rusina, S. & Kabucis, I. 2010. 6410 Mitri zalaji periodiski izzustosas augsnes [6410 Molinia meadows on calcareous, peaty or clayey-silt-laden soils]. In Eiropas Savienibas aizsargajamie biotopi Latvija. Noteiksanas rokasgramata (Aunins, A., ed.), pp. 160-163. Latvijas Dabas fonds, Riga (in Latvian).

Sabardina, G. S. 1957. Grassland Vegetation of the Latvian SSR. Izd. AN Latv. SSR, Riga (in Russian with English summary).

Schubert, R. 2001. Prodromus der Pflanzen-Gesellschaften Sachsen-Anhalts. Mitteilungen zur floristischen Kartierung Sachsen-Anhalt. Botanischer Verein Sachsen-Anhalt.

Skodova, I. 2007. Cirsio-Brachypodium pinnati. In Travinnobylinnd vegetdcia Slovenska--elektronicky expertny system na identifikaciu syntaxonov (Janisova, M., ed.), pp. 80-85. Botanicky ustav SAV, Bratislava (in Slovak).

Weber, H. E., Moravec, J. & Theurillat, J.-P. 2000. International code of phytosociological nomenclature. 3rd edn. J. Veg. Sci., 11, 739-768.

Willems, J. H. & Bik, L. P. M. 1998. Restoration of high species density in calcareous grassland: the role of seed rain and soil seed bank. Appl. Veg. Sci., 1, 91-100.

Agnese Priede

Institute of Biology, Laboratory of Geobotany, Miera Street 3, Salaspils, LV-2169, Latvia; agnesepriede@hotmail.com

Received 2 September 2010, revised 15 February 2011
Table 1. Pearson correlation coefficients between the mean Ellenberg
values on the first two DCA axes

Environmental factor      DCA Axis 1   DCA Axis 2

Light                        0.181       -0.127
Temperature                 -0.278       -0.205
Continentality              -0.337       -0.344
Moisture                     0.794 *      0.075
Reaction                    -0.337       -0.205
Nitrogen                    -0.413        0.266
Total herbaceous cover       0.122        0.157
Total moss cover            -0.107        0.033
Total litter cover          -0.150       -0.128
Total number of species     -0.453        0.027
Management                  -0.108        0.083

* Significant at 0.05 level.

Table 2. Comparison of the mean Ellenberg values in two major
TWINSPAN groups

                                       Light   Temperature

Sesleria caerulea-Bromion sub-group    6.90       5.30
Sesleria caerulea-Molinion sub-group   7.10       5.20
Mean of Sesleria caerulea group        7.00       5.15
Standard Deviation                     0.14       0.07

Molinia caerulea sub-group             7.10       5.30
Carex hostiana sub-group               7.10       5.10
Mean of Molinia caerulea group         7.10       5.20
Standard deviation                       0        0.14

t-value                                1.00       0.44
p-value *                              0.42       0.69

                                       Continentality   Moisture

Sesleria caerulea-Bromion sub-group         3.90           7.10
Sesleria caerulea-Molinion sub-group        3.60           6.90
Mean of Sesleria caerulea group             3.75           7.00
Standard Deviation                          0.21           0.14

Molinia caerulea sub-group                  3.90           7.50
Carex hostiana sub-group                    3.40           7.80
Mean of Molinia caerulea group              3.65           7.65
Standard deviation                          0.35           0.21

t-value                                     0.34          -3.60
p-value *                                   0.76           0.07

                                       Reaction   Nitrogen

Sesleria caerulea-Bromion sub-group      6.60       3.80
Sesleria caerulea-Molinion sub-group     7.10       3.10
Mean of Sesleria caerulea group          6.85       3.45
Standard Deviation                       0.35       0.49

Molinia caerulea sub-group               6.60       3.30
Carex hostiana sub-group                 6.10       3.70
Mean of Molinia caerulea group           6.35       3.50
Standard deviation                       0.35       0.28

t-value                                  1.40      -0.12
p-value *                                0.29       0.91

* Significant at 0.05 level.

Table 3. Species richness at abandoned and mown sites

                                Sesleria         Sesleria
                                caerulea-       caerulea-
                                 Bromion         Molinion
                                sub-group       sub-group
                                 n = 25          n = 103

Mean number of species per    21.6 (n = 25)   16.7 (n = 103)
  releve
Total number of species per   25 (n = 12)     16 (n = 74)
  releve at abandoned sites
Total number of species per   20 (n = 13)     18 (n = 29)
releve at mown sites

                                Molinia         Carex
                               caerulea       hostiana
                               sub-group      sub-group
                                n = 38         n = 15

Mean number of species per    12 (n = 38)   12.7 (n = 15)
  releve
Total number of species per   12 (n = 17)   13 (n = 2)
  releve at abandoned sites
Total number of species per   12 (n = 21)   13 (n = 13)
releve at mown sites

n, number of samples.
COPYRIGHT 2011 Estonian Academy Publishers
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2011 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Priede, Agnese
Publication:Estonian Journal of Ecology
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:4EXLA
Date:Dec 1, 2011
Words:8106
Previous Article:Biochemical and structural characteristics of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in an alkaline. environment/Hariliku manni (Pinus sylvestris L.)...
Next Article:Radon emissions in Harju County, North Estonia/Radooniemissioonid Harjumaal.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters