Printer Friendly

Phylogenetic species identification of Pilobolus associated with horses in Indiana and Ohio.

ABSTRACT. Pilobolus, a coprophilous zygomycete, is associated with herbivores. The various species of this fungus have been collected from a wide range of hosts. Most species have been isolated from multiple hosts. However, P. longipes has been reported exclusively associated with Equus spp. This study was undertaken to examine the species specific relationship of P. longipes and members of Equus, specifically E. caballus (horses). Dung samples were collected from horses located within 25 miles of Richmond, Indiana for isolates of Pilobolus. Sporangiospores from these fungal isolates were used as the source of DNA. Sequences of taxonomically informative 18S and ITS regions of rDNA were obtained using previously published protocols. DNA sequences were aligned with BLAST and compared with sequences deposited in GenBank. Sequences of DNA from the isolates in this study were examined using MEGA 4 with Clustal W. By comparing the sequences of DNA from isolates in this study with those in GenBank, it was determined that P. longipes, P. sphaerosporus, P. kleinii and P. pullus are associated with horses in Indiana and Ohio. All isolates recovered in this study are large-spore producing species of Pilobolus.

Keywords: Pilobolus, horses, DNA, ITS, 18S

INTRODUCTION

The coprophilous fungus, Pilobolus, is a well known, but little studied organism. Because of its dramatic ballistic spore discharge mechanism and its photogenic qualities, Pilobolus is mentioned in many general biology texts and is often given a lot of space in mycology texts (Buller 1934, Yafetto et al. 2008, Page 1962, 1964). However, other than these characteristics, little is known about the environmental conditions most conducive to its growth, and while having been collected and described from many locations worldwide, few correlations have been drawn about the growth of the fungus in relationship to its hosts, climate, nutrition, economic value, parasitic or symbiotic relationships with other organisms.

Pilobolus has been reported associated with many herbivores including virtually all ungulates, a large number of rodents, and various other mammals (Hu et al. 1989, Santiago et al. 2008). However, there seems to be almost no correlation between most species of Pilobolus and a particular species of host. However, P. longipes has been reported only associated with the genus Equus (horses, zebras, donkeys). This study was designed to examine the specificity of this relationship of the various species of Pilobolus and Equus caballus (horses) and to determine whether P. longipes is the most frequently occurring species found in association with horses. Pilobolus isolates associated with each of the horses in this study were identified to species using molecular techniques.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Isolates of Pilobolus were collected from the dung of horses in Ohio and Indiana and cultivated in microcosms until sporangia were produced. Mature sporangia were collected and maintained in collecting water using techniques described previously (Foos 1989, Foos & Royer 1989, Foos et al. 2001).

It has been shown that multiple species of Pilobolus exist simultaneously in dung (Foos 1997), so multiple sporangia were collected from each dung sample. When two or more isolates from the same dung sample were morphologically identical, only one was maintained for further study.

Pure cultures were obtained using single sporangium transfers to plastic Petri dishes containing dung agar or synthetic hemin medium (SHM) (Levetin &Caroselli 1976). Cultures arising from sporangial transfers were maintained on SHM or dung agar in disposable plastic Petri dishes sealed with parafilm at 22 [+ or -] 2[degrees]C with alternating 12 h light and dark periods of 2000 lux, cool white fluorescent illumination. Sporangia from pure culture isolates were examined microscopically and tentatively identified to species using morphological characteristics.

Individual sporangia which adhered to the lids of the Petri dishes were collected using sterile inoculating needles and placed in 0.2 ml micro-centrifuge tubes containing 20 [micro]l sterile collecting water (with 3% penicillin, 3% streptomycin, and 1% Tween 20), labeled and stored at 4[degrees]C. DNA was extracted from the sporangiospores using techniques described previously (Foos et al. 2011).

The primers designed specifically to amplify and sequence taxonomically significant DNA fragments were used (White et al. 1990). Primers NS1--NS8 were used to amplify the nuclear 18S small subunit (SSU) of rRNA and primers ITS5 and ITS4 were used to amplify the entire ITS region of nuclear rRNA, specifically the 5.8S region, the associated internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS2), with terminal portions of the 18S and 28S regions of rRNA.

DNA was amplified using AmpliTaq[R] Gold DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California) and a dNTP mix (Promega Corporation, Fitchburg, Wisconsin). Thermal cycling was conducted in a Perkin Elmer GeneAmp[R] PCR System 2400. PCR reaction conditions for thermal cycling were 94[degrees]C for 5 min, followed by 36 cycles of 94[degrees]C for 1 min, 50 [degrees]C for 1 min 30 sec, 72[degrees]C for 2 min, followed by an extension at 72[degrees]C for 7 min. PCR products were purified with QIAquick[R] PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, California).

PCR amplified DNA fragments were electrophoresed prior to and following the clean up process, on 1% agarose gels in 1X TBE buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM boric acid, and 1 mM EDTA) containing ethidium bromide and visualized using a Chemilmager[TM] 4400 Imaging System (Alpha Innotech, San Leandro, California). A 100 bp DNA ladder (Takara Mirus Bio, Madison, Wisconsin) was used as a size marker.

PCR products were sequenced with BigDye[R] Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California) and a sequence reaction mix comprised of 2 [micro]l [H.sub.2]O, 3 [micro]l 5X buffer, 1 [micro]l BigDye, 2 [micro]l 10 mM primer, and 2 [micro]L fungal DNA. Thermal cycling conditions for sequencing were 25 cycles of 96 [degrees]C for 10 s, 50[degrees]C for 5 s and 60[degrees]C for 4 min. Sequences were analyzed using an Applied Biosystems 3700 automated fluorescence system at the Indiana Molecular Biology Institute.

DNA sequences were examined and compared using CodonCode Aligner (CodonCode Corp., Dedham, Massachusetts) containing PHRED and PHRAP (Ewing &Green 1998, Ewing et al. 1998) for base calling, sequence comparisons and sequence assembly. Contigs created in CodonCode were oriented with BLAST (Altschul et al. 1990) and aligned using Clustal W (Thompson et al. 1994, 1997). Phylogenetic and molecular evolutionary analyses were conducted and trees constructed using MEGA version 4 (Tamura et al. 2007).

Evolutionary histories of both 18S and ITS rDNA sequences were inferred using the neighbor-joining method (Saitou & Nei 1987). The bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 2000 replicates is taken to represent the evolutionary history of the taxa analyzed (Felsenstein 1985). Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50% bootstrap replicates were collapsed. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test were shown next to the branches (Felsenstein 1985). The trees were drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary distances were computed using maximum composite likelihood (Tamura et al. 2004) and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site. All positions containing alignment gaps and missing data were eliminated only in pairwise sequence comparisons.

RESULTS

Fifteen isolates of Pilobolus were obtained from horse dung in Ohio and Indiana. Locations, collection dates, and voucher numbers of these isolates are listed in Table 1. Pilobolus kleinii Tiegh., P. longipes Tiegh., P. pullus Massee and P. shpaerosporus Palla were isolated from this dung. DNA sequences of both 18S and ITS regions were analyzed from each isolate, except that the sequences from the 18S region of IUE 0018 and the ITS regions of IUE 0006 and IUE 0021 could not be recovered.

Phylogenetic species identification using phylograms.--Phylograms were created using orthologous sequences from six species of Pilobolus obtained from GenBank as controls. These DNA sequences from these GenBank ex-type specimens were used as a phylogenetic species key.

The phylogram (Fig. 1) is inferred from the rDNA sequences that code for the 18S region of rRNA of the isolates. Sequences from the isolates in this study form a clade with large-spore producing species of Pilobolus from GenBank (P. kleinii, P. longipes and P. sphaerosporus), distinct from the clade with small-spore producing species from GenBank (P. crystallinus, P. roridus and P. umbonatus). Two subordinate or sister clades formed within the major clade of large-spore producing species. One contains P. sphaerosporus (DQ211052) from GenBank and isolates of P. sphaerosporus and P. pullus from this study. Pilobolus pullus forms a subordinate clade distinct from that of P. sphaerosporus. The other clade contains P. longipes (DQ211053), and P. kleinii (EU595656) from GenBank and specimens from this study. There is strong bootstrap support [100%] for these clades as represented in the phylogram.

The phylogram (Fig. 2) inferred from the rDNA sequences that code for the ITS region of rRNA is very similar to the phylogram inferred from the sequences for the 18S region (Fig. 1). One major clade includes all of the large-spore producing species from GenBank (P. kleinii, P. sphaerosporus, P. longipes and P. heterosporus) and sequences from specimens from this study. (The ITS sequence from P. heterosporus (HM049582) in GenBank is included. There is no 18S sequence of this species in GenBank or other DNA sequence repository.) The small spore-producing species from GenBank (P. crystallinus, P. roridus and P. umbonatus) are outside this clade. This major clade includes subordinate clades which contain all of the specimens from this study. Pilobolus sphaerosporus (DQ059382) from GenBank and specimens from this study form one subordinate clade. The isolates of P. kleinii and P. pullus are in a second subordinate clade, while P. longipes (FJ160950) and P. heterosporus (HM049582) from GenBank and specimens from this study form a third clade. The inferences from these distinct clades are supported by strong bootstrap values.

Phylogenetic species identification using homology.--Species identification using sequence identity of homologous regions was recently reported for Pilobolus (Foos & Sheehan 2011). Representative sequences of all species of Pilobolus deposited in GenBank were used as controls representing these species. Percentage identity of both the homologous 18S and ITS regions were examined.

When comparing specimens of various species of Pilobolus, homologous 18S regions of rDNA from GenBank representatives had > 97% identity. Table 2 shows the percentage identities of the homologous 18S regions of rDNA for specimens from this study compared with the orthologous regions of GenBank specimens. The sequence homology of the three isolates of P. kleinii from this study and P. kleinii (EU595656) from GenBank displayed > 99.6% identity. Some variation may be attributed to particular strains of the species or associated with the molecular techniques used to amplify and sequence the DNA.

The three isolates of P. sphaerosporus were identical to each other and had > 99.8% identity with P. sphaerosporus (DQ211052) from GenBank. The other two isolates of this species were unique, yet had [greater than or equal to] 99.6% identity with the GenBank control.

In all instances the identities of intraspecies homologous 18S rDNA regions from isolates from this study and from GenBank sequences were [greater than or equal to] 99.6%. Interspecies homologies of the same 18S regions from the GenBank specimens had < 99.3% identity.

Table 3 shows the percentage identities of the homologous ITS regions of rDNA for specimens from this study compared with the orthologous regions of GenBank specimens.

The identities of the homologous ITS regions of the three specimens of P. kleinii from this study and the GenBank control (FJ160957) were > 95.4%. The homologous ITS regions of the two specimens of P. longipes from this study and GenBank (FJ160950) displayed > 97.7% identity. The homologous ITS regions of P. sphaerosporus specimens from this study had > 89.4% identity with GenBank (DQ059382). The homologous ITS regions of the three isolates of P. pullus had > 99.8% identity to each other. No sequences from isolates of P. pullus are present in GenBank or other DNA sequence repository, so these isolates were compared with sequences from all species of Pilobolus for which sequences were available. When compared to the homologous ITS regions of the four large-spore producing species of Pilobolus in Gen-Bank, including P. heterosporus (HM049582), the P. pullus sequences displayed 78.3-83.2% identity.

DISCUSSION

Specimens of Pilobolus collected from horses in Indiana and Ohio were identified by phylogenetic species identification techniques using the 18S regions and the ITS regions of rRNA as taxonomic markers. Orthologous regions of DNA sequences from ex-type isolates of species of Pilobolus from GenBank were used for comparison.

Inferred evolutionary histories and taxonomically important characteristics used for identification do not always agree. However, the use of phylograms to show relationships among DNA sequences from various organisms permits an opportunity to distinguish among species and strains in which these DNA sequences differ. The phylogram in Figure 1 displays the inferred evolutionary distance based upon 18S rDNA sequences in this study and shows a great evolutionary distance between the major clade containing P. sphaerosporus, P. pullus, P. kleinii and P. longipes, all large-spore producing species, from P. crystallinus, P. roridus and P. umbonatus, all small-spore producing species. Figure 2, a phylogram illustrating the inferred evolutionary distance based upon ITS rDNA sequences shows the same pattern. The relationship of P. pullus to P. kleinii and P. sphaerosporus differs in the two inferred evolutionary histories and supports the concept of a "Pilobolus kleinii group" suggested earlier (Palla 1900, Massee 1901, Grove 1934).

The high percentage identities of the homologous 18S regions of rDNA make these good sequences to use to identify specimens of Pilobolus to genus. Intraspecies identities of the homologous 18S region of rDNA from specimens of Pilobolus were > 99%. The most similar orthologous 18S sequence from a genus other than Pilobolus found in GenBank was 94.18% identity from Pilaira anomala (EU-595659). From this study we can infer that homologous identities of the 18S region between isolates of Pilobolus > 99% indicate the same species, identities of 95-99% indicate both are the same genus, but different species.

The rDNA that codes for the complete ITS region of rRNA contains two non-coding internal transcribed spacers that are more variable than coding regions (Nilsson et al. 2008). Because of this homologous identities within ITS regions of rDNA are much lower than those of the 18S regions.

Intraspecies identities of homologous ITS regions from the specimens collected in this study and the GenBank controls ranged from 95.4-100% for P. kleinii, 97.7-100% for P. longipes, 89.4-100% for P. sphaerosporus and > 99.8% among the specimens of P. pullus. The relative low percentage identity (89.4%) of intraspecies homologies of the ITS region of Pilobolus sphaerosporus isolates in this study indicates multiple strains.

Homologous identities of ITS regions of rDNA from isolates of different species of Pilobolus deposited in GenBank range from 59.7-83%. The most similar orthologous ITS sequence from a genus other than Pilobolus found in GenBank was from Mucor heirnalis (DQ888726) with 62.0% identity. Interspecies homologous identities of the ITS regions of rDNA of isolates are more variable than those of 18S regions. Two isolates of Pilobolus having homologous identities of > 85% would indicate that they are the same species.

Variability of taxonomically valuable morphological characteristics is at the core of the difficulty identifying cryptic species of Pilobolus, thus requiring the use of phylogenetic species identification. The ephemeral nature of specimens, the propensity for multiple species of the same genus to grow in the same habitat, and the difficulty in culturing cryptic organisms have caused multiple field studies to use phylogenetic species identifications to report the presence of species that have not been isolated or cultured (Smit et al. 1999, Anderson & Cairney 2004, Bonito et al. 2010, Poitelon et al. 2009). This creates a taxonomic problem. If DNA from all taxa were to have been sequenced and reported, then the discovery of a new DNA sequence would indicate the presence of an undescribed organism. However, DNA sequences from most organisms, particularly cryptic organisms and microorganisms that were collected and identified many years ago, have not been identified. So, when new phylogenetic species are identified using DNA sequences, there is no way to know whether the organisms are undescribed morphological species, or the phylogenetic species identity of a morphological species described previously. As organisms for which we have phylogenetic species identifications are cultured and identified morphologically, we can reconcile the morphological species identity with the phylogenetic species identity of an organism.

In this study the specimens of P. pullus isolated at three locations are morphologically very similar to P. kleinii. However DNA sequences of taxonomically significant rRNA regions of P. pullus do not align with the homologous sequences of any known Pilobolus species. Pilobolus pullus from this study might be described as P. kleinii if only morphological characteristics were considered. However, the significant difference between the rDNA sequences of P. pullus and P. kleinii show them to be distinct cryptic species.

DNA sequences of only 7 of 59 species of Pilobolus described in the literature have been deposited in GenBank. Most of these species were originally described many years ago, the most recent by Buller (1934). Even though multiple species have been redescribed more recently (Hu et al. 1989), no molecular data were included. Specimens of Pilobolus are ephemeral, microscopic, and fragile. No type cultures exist. These conditions make the revision of this genus necessary. In fact, the very reasons that revisions are necessary make revisions very difficult.

The example of P. pullus from this study represents a chasm between phylogenetic species recognition (PSR) and morphological species recognition (MSR) and demonstrates the challenge represented the need MSR to be correlated with PSR (Taylor et al. 2006). When viable type cultures of species described in the nineteenth century and earlier are unavailable, and there is no specimen that can be examined using molecular methods, there is little likelihood that it will be possible to determine the PSR identity for most of the species that have been described.

We found four species of Pilobolus growing on dung of horses in Indiana and Ohio. Pilobolus longipes, often specifically associated with horses, was isolated. But, it did not constitute the only species nor was it the most commonly found species. The identities of the various species were supported by both phylograms and sequence homology. These phylogenetic techniques correlated with tentative morphological species identifications. However, the phylogenetic techniques distinguished between specimens of cryptic species (P. kleinii and P. pullus) that would probably have been identified as a single species using morphological techniques.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Kathy B. Sheehan for her help developing molecular techniques and Dale Beach for help with data analysis. We are grateful to Lawrence Washington, Indiana University, Bloomington, for sequence analysis. The Indiana University Foundation provided support for this research through multiple grants.

LITERATURE CITED

Altschul, S.F., W. Gish, W.E.E. Myers & D.J. Lipman. 1990. Basic local alignment search tools. Journal of Molecular Biology 215:403-410.

Anderson, I.C. & J.W.G. Cairney. 2004. Diversity and ecology of soil fungal communities: increased understanding through the application of molecular techniques. Environmental Microbiology 6:769-779.

Bonito, G., O.S. Isikhuemhen & R. Vilgalys. 2010. Identification of fungi associated with municipal compost using DNA-based techniques. Bioresource Technology 101 : 1021-1027.

Buller, A.H.R. 1934. Researches on Fungi. Vol. 6. Longmans, Green, Co., London, United Kingdom. 513 pp.

Ewing, B. & P. Green. 1998. Basecalling of automated sequencer traces using PHRED II. Error probabilities. Genome Research 8:186-194.

Ewing, B., L. Hillier, M. Wendl, M & P. Green. 1998. Basecalling of automated sequencer traces using PHRED I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Research 8:175-185.

Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.

Foos, K.M. 1989. Isolation of Pilobolus spp. from the northern elk herd in Yellowstone National Park. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 25(2):302-304.

Foos, K.M. 1997. Pilobolus and lungworm disease affecting elk in Yellowstone National Park. Mycological Research 101(12):1535-1536.

Foos, K.M. & J.A. Royer. 1989. A survey of Pilobolus from Yellowstone National Park. Mycotaxon 34(2):395-397.

Foos, K.M., J.A. Royer & D.G. Ruch. 2001. Simple methods for collecting coprophilous fungi. Micologia Aplicada International 13(1):51-54.

Foos, K.M. & K.B. Sheehan. 2011. Molecular identification of Pilobolus species from Yellow-stone National Park. Mycologia 103(6):1208-1215.

Foos, K.M., K.B. Sheehan, D.L. Beach, N.L. May, D.G. Ruch & M. Pomper. 2011. Phylogeny of Pilobolaceae. Mycologia 103(1):36-44.

Grove, W.B. 1934. A systematic account and arrangement of the Pilobolidae. In Researches on Fungi (Buller, A.H.R., ed.), London: Longmans, Green Co. pp. 190-224.

Hu, F.M., R.Y. Zheng & G.Q. Chen. 1989. A redelimitation of the species of Pilobolus. Mycosystema 2:111-133.

Levetin, E.H. & N.E. Caroselli. 1976. A simplified medium for growth and sporulation of Pilobolus species. Mycologia 68:1254-1258.

Massee, G.E. 1901. Fungi exotici, III. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information of the Royal Botanical Gardens Kew 1901:150-169. Nilsson, R.H., E. Kristiansson, M. Ryberg, N.

Hallenberg & K-H. Larsson. 2008. Intraspecific ITS variability in the kingdom Fungi as expressed in the international sequence databases and its implications for molecular species identification. Evolutionary Bioinformatics 4:193-201.

Page, R.M. 1962. Light and the asexual reproduction of Pilobolus. Science 138:1238-1245.

Page, R.M. 1964. Sporangium discharge in Pilobolus: a photographic study. Science 146:925-927.

Palla, E. 1900. Zur Kenntniss der Pilobolus-Arten.

Oesterr. Bot. Zeitschr. 50:349-371 & 397-401.

Poitelon, J.-B., M. Joyeux, B. Welte, J-P. Duguet, J.

Peplies & M.S. DuBow. 2009. Identification and phylogeny of eukaryotic 18S rDNA phylotypes detected in chlorinated finished drinking water samples from three Parisian surface water treatment plants. Letters in Applied Microbiology 49:589-595.

Saitou, N. & M. Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4:406-425.

Santiago, A.L.C.M. de A., M.A.Q. Cavalcanti & S.F.B. Truem. 2008. Pilobolus (Mucoraceae) from herbivore dung in Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. Mycotaxon 104:111-122.

Smit, E., P. Leeflang, B. Glandorf, J.D. van Elsas & K. Wernars. 1999. Analysis of fungal diversity in the wheat rhizosphere by sequencing of cloned PCR-amplified genes encoding 18S rRNA and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 165:2614-2621.

Tamura, K., J. Dudley, M. Nei & S. Kumar. 2007. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software. Version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24:1596-1599.

Tamura, K., M. Nei & Kumar, S. 2004. Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 101:11030-11035.

Taylor, J.W., E. Turner, J.P. Townsend, J.R. Dettman & D. Jacobson. 2006. Eukaryotic microbes, species recognition and the geographic limits of species: examples from the kingdom Fungi. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 361:1947-1963.

Thompson, J.D., T.J. Gibson, F. Plewniak, F. Jeanmougin & D.G. Higgins. 1997. ClustalX-Windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25:4876-4882.

Thompson, J.D., D.G. Higgins & T.J. Gibson. 1994. ClustalW: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighing, position, specific gap penalties, and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22:4673-4680.

White, T.J., T. Bruns, S. Lee & J. Taylor. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: (Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J. & White, T.J., eds.). PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, California. pp. 315-322.

Yafetto, L., L. Carrol, Y. Cui, D.J. Davis, M.W.F. Fischer, A.C. Henterly, J.D. Kessler, H.A. Kilroy, J.L. Shidler & J.L. Stolze-Rybczynski. 2008. The fastest flights in nature: high-speed spore discharge mechanisms among fungi. PLoS One 3(9): 1-4.

Manuscript received 20 May 2011, revised 10 December 2012.

Sheila D. Pierce and K. Michael Foos: Department of Biology, Indiana University East, Richmond, Indiana 47374

Corresponding Author: K. Michael Foos, 3516 Woods Dr., Richmond, IN 47374, Phone: 765-966-0026 (e-mail: foos@iue.edu).

Table 1.--Specimens of Pilobolus isolated from horse dung in Ohio
and Indiana listed by IUE voucher numbers, collection dates and
locations.

Voucher
Number      Date         Location              GPS-N

IUE0002   5/2/2004    Fayette Co., IN   39[degrees] 38.798'
IUE0004   5/8/2004    Union Co., IN     39[degrees] 38.570'
IUE0005   5/8/2004    Union Co., IN     39[degrees] 36.709'
IUE0006   5/8/2004    Union Co., IN     39[degrees] 38.815'
IUE0007   5/22/2004   Wayne Co., IN     39[degrees] 52.008'
IUE0009   5/24/2004   Preble Co., OH    39[degrees] 51.976'
IUE0010   6/14/2004   Wayne Co., IN     39[degrees] 57.501'
IUE0013   6/14/2004   Wayne Co., IN     39[degrees] 57.869'
IUE0014   6/14/2004   Wayne Co., IN     39[degrees] 59.574'
IUE0015   6/14/2004   Wayne Co., IN     39[degrees] 56.831'
IUE0016   7/12/2004   Darke Co., OH     39[degrees] 56.079'
IUE0017   7/12/2004   Darke Co., OH     39[degrees] 55.947'
IUE0018   7/12/2004   Darke Co., OH     39[degrees] 58.577'
IUE0020   7/12/2004   Darke Co., OH     39[degrees] 57.774'
IUE0021   7/12/2004   Preble Co., OH    39[degrees] 52.144'

Voucher
Number           GPS-W               Species

IUE0002   85[degrees] 12.860'   P. sphaerosporus
IUE0004   84[degrees] 49.920'   P. kleinii
IUE0005   84[degrees] 53.225'   P. kleinii
IUE0006   84[degrees] 54.507'   P. kleinii
IUE0007   85[degrees] 09.714'   P. sphaerosporus
IUE0009   84[degrees] 30.283'   P. k1eind
IUE0010   85[degrees] 06.160'   P. pullus
IUE0013   85[degrees] 05.983'   P. sphaerosporus
IUE0014   85[degrees] 05.329'   P. pullus
IUE0015   85[degrees] 04.044'   P. sphaerosporus
IUE0016   84[degrees] 30.305'   P. longipes
IUE0017   84[degrees] 29.859'   P. pullus
IUE0018   84[degrees] 32.364'   P. sphaerosporus
IUE0020   84[degrees] 33.122'   P. longipes
IUE0021   84[degrees] 43.396'   P. sphaerosporus

Table 2.--Comparison of 18S homologous rDNA sequences from known
species of Pilobolus in GenBank with sequences from isolates
collected in this study in percent identity. No GenBank
representative of P. pullus existed prior to this study. Here P.
pullus is compared with representatives of all Pilobolus species
from GenBank.

    GenBank               GenBank       This Study             IUE
Control Species     bp     Number        Isolate         bp     ID

P. kleinii         1763   EU595656   P. kleinii         1763   0004
                                     P. kleinii         1763   0005
                                     P. kleinii         1764   0006
                                     P. pullus          1764   0017

P. longipes        1763   DQ211053   P. pullus          1764   0017

P. sphaerosporus   1764   DQ211052   P. sphaerosporus   1764   0002
                                     P. sphaerosporus   1764   0007
                                     P. sphaerosporus   1764   0013
                                     P. sphaerosporus   1764   0015
                                     P. sphaerosporus   1763   0021
                                     P. pullus          1764   0017

P. pullus          1764   HQ877880   P. pullus          1764   0014
                                     P. pullus          1674   0010

P. crystallinus    1763   EU595652   P. pullus          1764   0017

P. roridus         1762   EU595649   P. pullus          1764   0017

P. umbonatus       1764   DQ211051   P. pullus          1764   0017

    GenBank        GenBank    Identity
Control Species     Number       %

P. kleinii         HQ682649   100.00
                   AY823738    99.98
                   DQ363379    99.60
                   HQ877880    99.32

P. longipes        HQ877880    99.21

P. sphaerosporus   HQ682648    99.89
                   HQ682650    99.89
                   HQ682651    99.89
                   HQ682652    99.89
                   HQ682653    99.60
                   HQ877880    99.55

P. pullus          HQ877879    99.94
                   HQ877878    99.76

P. crystallinus    HQ877880    98.13

P. roridus         HQ877880    97.34

P. umbonatus       HQ877880    97.51

Table 3.--Comparison of ITS homologous rDNA sequences from known
species of Pilobolus in GenBank with sequences from isolates
collected in this study in percent identity. No GenBank
representative of P. pullus existed prior to this study. Here P.
pullus is compared with representatives of all Pilobolus species
from GenBank.

    GenBank              GenBank       This Study            IUE
Control Species    bp     Number        Isolate        bp     ID

P. kleinii         704   FJ160957   P. kleinii         613   0004
                                    P. kleinii         700   0005
                                    P. kleinii         690   0009
                                    P. pullus          689   0017

P. longipes        688   FJ160950   P. longipes        688   0016
                                    P. longipes        671   0020
                                    P. pullus          689   0017

P. sphaerosporus   694   DQ059382   P. sphaerosporus   618   0002
                                    P. sphaerosporus   695   0007
                                    P. sphaerosporus   694   0013
                                    P. sphaerosporus   696   0015
                                    P. sphaerosporus   694   0018
                                    P. pullus          689   0017

P. pullus          662   HQ877877   P. pullus          662   0014
                         HQ877877   P. pullus          661   0010

P. heterosporus    698   HM049582   P. pullus          689   0017

P. crystallinus    657   FJ160949   P. pullus          689   0017

P. roridus         694   FJ160948   P. pullus          689   0017

P. umbonatus       707   DQ058412   P. pullus          689   0017

    GenBank        GenBank    Identity
Control Species     Number       %

P. kleinii         HQ682655    100.00
                   HQ682656     95.43
                   HQ682658     96.52
                   HQ877877     83.16

P. longipes        HQ682661    100.00
                   HQ682663     97.76
                   HQ877877     78.37

P. sphaerosporus   HQ682654     89.48
                   HQ682657     90.94
                   HQ682659     90.78
                   HQ682660     91.24
                   HQ682662    100.00
                   HQ877877     78.66

P. pullus          HQ877876    100.00
                   HQ877875     99.85

P. heterosporus    HQ877877     82.50

P. crystallinus    HQ877877     75.38

P. roridus         HQ877877     70.42

P. umbonatus       HQ877877     68.43
COPYRIGHT 2012 Indiana Academy of Science
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Pierce, Sheila D.; Foos, K. Michael
Publication:Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jul 20, 2012
Words:4774
Previous Article:Lake fish assemblages in Hoosier National Forest, Perry County, Indiana, with emphasis on lake condition assessment.
Next Article:Conservation status of North American freshwater crayfish (Decapoda: Cambaridae) from the southern United States.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters