Printer Friendly

Photothermally Activated Two-Photon Absorption in Ion-Implanted Silicon Quantum Dots in Silica Plates.

1. Introduction

Recent progress in device fabrication opens up fascinating possibilities for the incorporation of advanced nanostructured materials to enhance the performance of all-optical operations [1]. Integrated nanophotonic systems could provide platforms for developing ultracompact signal processing tools and dense configurations for manipulating optical information in the ultrafast regime [2]. The potential to multiplex large data streams by ultrashort laser pulses seems to be a suitable alternative for solving some of the key challenges in several technological applications [3]. Nonlinear optical effects anticipate the all-optical implementation of multifunctional photonic elements that can simultaneously perform various signal processing tasks [4]. In the same direction, distinct computing approaches based on quantum network technologies can be envisioned as essential tools for designing novel optical data communication systems [5].

Silicon-based materials have been employed as the main components for building modern electronic and optoelectronic systems [6]. The dynamics of electronic andphotothermal processes emerging from silicon quantum dots (SiQDs) seem to be attractive for the development of extremely small structures that confine the fundamental charge carriers responsible for semiconductive phenomena [7]. Silicon nanostructures exhibit powerful optical and nonlinear optical properties that can be attractive for the development of a new generation of nonlinear photonic devices [8]. In particular, it has been pointed out that excitonic effects associated with SiQDs can be derived by quantumc onfinement mechanisms, and they could play a critical role in the enhancement of the nonlinear optical response [9].

From these collective excitations related to periodically ordered SiQDs arrays, one can consider the enhancement of nanophotonic properties that could promote superior light manipulation techniques at the nanoscale [10]. The involvement of discrete density of states of SiQDs under illumination may originate essential interactions for practical applications such as low-dimensional laser systems [11], single-photon sources [12], photonic waveguide circuits [13], or all-optical switching devices [14].

Optical and electronic transitions associated with high-irradiance beams can be also considered to generate absorptive or refractive nonlinearities that potentially play a crucial role for modulating photonic signals [15]. Since the nonlinear optical properties exhibited by SiQDs are drastically dependent on the size and size distribution of nanoparticles in the sample, then also the processing route for their synthesis can significantly influence their optical properties [16]. In this respect, MeV ion implantation technique allows the versatile design of structured samples with SiQDs following a particular depth profile distribution that can be controlled by the energy, fluence, and angle of the ion beam. Moreover, ion implantation is fully compatible with CMOS technology processing design in actual microelectronics. Then, one of the main advantages of this synthesis method is its potential to create nanosystems that may be attractive for direct applications that require very stable optical and mechanical characteristics.

In view of all of these elements, the topic discussed in this paper mainly presents an analysis of the third-order nonlinear infrared and ultraviolet effects exhibited by ion-implanted SiQDs embedded in silica plates. A modification from ultraviolet saturated absorption to two-photon absorption in the sample was observed by a photothermal action able to demodulate laser signals. A picosecond self-diffraction method was carried out to explore the magnitude of the third-order nonlinear susceptibility tensor of the sample at a 355 nm wavelength, while a z-scan technique was employed to measure infrared femtosecond nonlinear absorption and refraction effects. Within the text we discussed the fascinating nonlinearities that could be engineering in SiQDs by the contribution of cooperative interactions.

2. Experimental

2.1. Sample Preparation. The samples were synthesized by using the 3 MV Tandem accelerator (NEC 9SDH-2 Pelletron) facility at the Instituto de Fisica of the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. High-purity silica glass plates (25 x 25 x 1 mm) with OH content less than 1 ppm and total impurity content less than 20 ppm were employed as substrates. The room temperature ion implantation was performed by means of 1.5 MeV [Si.sup.+2] ions at a fluence of 2.5 x [10.sup.17] ions/[cm.sup.2]. The Si-implanted samples were then thermally annealed in a reducing atmosphere (50% [N.sub.2] + 50% [H.sub.2]) at 1100[degrees]C for 1 hour. A FEI Tecnai F30 Transmission Electron Microscope (FEGTEM 300 kV) in scanning mode (STEM) with a high angle annular dark field (HAADF) detector (Z-contrast) was used to performnanoscopic observations on the sample. The characteristic optical absorption spectrum of the studied samples was recorded by using an UV-visible spectrometer (Varian Cary 5000). Nonlinear optical measurements were investigated during different years in different regions of similar samples systematically studied.

2.2. Femtosecond z-Scan Explorations. The nonlinear absorption and nonlinear refraction exhibited by the samples with embedded SiQDs were studied by the z-scan technique using infrared femtosecond irradiation [17]. Z-scan measurements were undertaken by using a Ti:sapphire laser system with 80 fs pulses at 830 nm wavelength focused in a beam waist of 47 [micro]m [+ or -] 0.5 [micro]m, resulting in a peak irradiance of with 48 MW/[cm.sup.2], and a repetition rate of 94 MHz. The transmittance for the open-aperture z-scan technique can be described by [17]

T (z, [DELTA][[PHI].sub.o]) = 1 - [beta][I.sub.o][L.sub.eff]/[2[square root of (2)] ([x.sup.2] + 1)], (1)

where [beta] corresponds to the two-photon absorption coefficient, [L.sub.eff] is the effective length given by [[mathematical expression not reproducible] with L the sample length, and [[alpha].sub.o] is the linear absorption coefficient.

On the other hand, for the transmittance of the closed-aperture z-scan measurements, we considered [17]

T (z, [DELTA][[PHI].sub.o]) = 1 - 4[DELTA][[PHI].sub.o]x/ [([x.sup.2] + 9) ([x.sup.2] + 1)], (2)

where x = z/[z.sub.o], [z.sub.o] = k[w.sup.2.sub.o]/2, k = 2[pi]/[lambda], [lambda] represents the laser wavelength in free space, and the on-axis optical phase shift of the beam can be denoted by [DELTA][[PHI].sub.o] as

[DELTA][[PHI].sub.o] = k[DELTA][n.sub.o][L.sub.eff], (3)

the on-axis maximum refractive index change can be represented by [DELTA][n.sub.0] = [n.sub.2][I.sub.0] and related to the nonlinear refractive index, [n.sub.2,] and [I.sub.0] that corresponds to the focused peak on-axis irradiance.

2.3. Time-Resolved Optical Kerr Gate Evaluations. Optical Kerr gate (OKG) studies were undertaken in order to see the femtosecond time-resolved behavior of the SiQDs samples [18]. The pulses were provided by a Ti:sapphire laser system emitting a 825 nm wavelength, 80 fs pulses, and 3 nJ maximum pulse energy at 94 MHz. Pump and probe beams presented an irradiance relation of 15 : 1, vectorial planes of linear polarization making an angle of 45[degrees], and a spot size focused in about 80 [micro]m. The Kerr signal was recorded by a photodetector acquiring the probe irradiance propagated through an analyzer crossed with respect to the initial polarization of the probe beam. A lock-in amplifier assisted the experiment to detect the frequency related to the probe beam passing through a mechanical chopper. The probe transmittance as a function of the electronically controlled delay time between the pump to probe was measured.

2.4. Picosecond Ultraviolet Irradiation Studies. The single-beam transmittance of the sample irradiated by the third harmonic (355 nm) emerging from a Nd:YAG laser system (EKSPLA) with pulse duration of 25 ps was explored. Moreover, a degenerated two-wave mixing experiment with the same laser source was carried out to identify the magnitude of the third-order nonlinear ultraviolet response exhibited by the sample. The incident probe and pump beams at 355 nm wavelength were linearly polarized and adjusted to present an irradiance relation of 1 : 10. These two laser beams, focusing on the sample with a geometric angle of about 10[degrees], a spot size ~0.2 mm, and a total incident energy of 55 [micro]J, were analyzed at two different repetition rates, 1 Hz and 10 Hz repetition rates, respectively. The polarization of the probe beam was fixed, while the polarization of the pump beam was rotated with a half-wave plate. The self-diffracted irradiances were acquired by using a high speed Ga photodetector (DET 25K Thorlabs).

The expressions for describing the approximated amplitudes of the transmitted fields are [19]

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (4)

where [E.sub.1[+ or -]](z) and [E.sub.2[+ or -]](z) are the complex amplitudes associated with the circularly polarized components of the transmitted waves beams; [E.sub.3[+ or -]](z) and [E.sub.4[+ or -]](z) are the amplitudes of the self-diffracted waves; [alpha](I) is the irradiance dependent absorption coefficient; [J.sub.m]([[PSI].sup.(1).sub.[+ or -]]) stands for the Bessel function of order m; z is the thickness of the nonlinear media; and [[PSI].sup.(0).sub.[+ or -]] and [[PSI].sup.(1).sub.[+ or -]] are the nonlinear phase changes.

2.5. Photothermal Analysis. The photothermal response exhibited by the sample was measured by a Wheatstone bridge circuit with a thermistor as a sensor of temperature. The photothermal experiment was conducted with a 355 nm focused beam featuring 25 ps pulse duration and 10 Hz repetition rate. The change in temperature ([DELTA]T) was induced by 650 [micro]J laser excitation for 10 seconds in a spot area of 47.12 [mm.sup.2]. The temporal thermal response of the SiQDs sample was acquired by an infrared sensor with a resolution of 0.01[degrees]C. The signal was conditioned with a low noise amplifier and a 17-bit high-resolution analog-digital converter. The data were collected into a PC by an 8-bit Atmel microcontroller. In order to fit the experimental data, the numerical solution of the 2D heat equation was considered,

[partial derivative]T(x, y, t)/[partial derivative]t = k/[c.sub.p][rho] [[nabla].sup.2]T(x, y, t) + 1/[c.sub.p][rho] P (x, y, t), (5)

where t represents the time, x and y represent the spatial coordinates transverse to the propagation of the beam, k represents the thermal conductivity, [c.sub.p] represents the specific heat, [rho] represents the density, and P represents the Fourier series of the laser pumping. The parameters to approach the function were thickness 1 mm of the silica substrate and 400 nm for the FWHM of the implanted Si ions estimated by SRIM simulation [20]. The absorption coefficient is ten times smaller in pure silica that in the nanostructured samples with embedded SiQDs according spectroscopic measurements. Consequently, we can assume that thermal transport was mainly induced by the phonon dispersion on the SiQDs excited by the ultraviolet irradiation. Moreover, we reproduced the experiment in pristine silica plates to corroborate that no change in temperature was achieved under the same laboratory conditions.

2.6. Low-Pass Filter by Nonlinear Ultraviolet Absorption Effects in SiQDs. Ultraviolet picosecond pulses provided by our Nd:YAG system with two different repetition rates, c.a. 10 Hz and 1 Hz, were employed as a laser signal featuring a pulse-density-modulation (PDM). Here, PDM signals correspond to binary signals distinguished by their characteristic frequency, [f.sub.0] = 10 Hz and [f.sub.1] = 1 Hz, for representing the digital 0 or 1 value, respectively. The demodulation of the PDM signals was obtained through the nonlinear transmittance of the ion-implanted SiQDs sample behaving like a low-pass filter.

3. Results and Discussions

Figure 1 shows a STEM image of our samples where the white points in the micrograph represent the SiQDs. The estimated average size of the SiQDs was approximately 6 nm [+ or -] 2.5 nm. SRIM calculations indicated that the FWHM of the Si depth profile distribution is ~400 nm with a maximum peak concentration located at about 1700 nm below the surface of the silica substrate.

In Figure 2 the comparative UV-Vis spectra for the silica sample with embedded SiQDs and the pristine silica are illustrated. For the SiQDs sample, a well-defined absorption edge can be visualized. Reproducibility in the fabrication of the sample was guaranteed by SEM and UV-Vis spectroscopic measurements. Crystallinity of the SiQDs has been previously verified by photoluminescence analysis of comparative samples prepared by ion implantation [10].

Figure 3 describes the open-aperture z-scan data (80 fs at 830 nm excitation wavelength) resolving a two-photon absorption effect; that is, a diminishing transmittance at the focal plane can be seen. The fit in the plot was computed by using (1) and the estimated [beta] = 1.6 x 1[0.sup.-7] m/W magnitude.

The closed-aperture z-scan experiments (Figure 4) denote a positive nonlinear refractive index [n.sup.2] for the fs pulses. The value [n.sub.2] = 2.11 x [10.sup.-14] [m.sup.2]/W was obtained by the fitting performed by using (2).

Figure 5 demonstrates the ultrafast time-resolved OKG measurements collected for the SiQDs excited by infrared fs pulses. The data demonstrates a nonlinear Kerr response that raises and decays during the femtosecond pulse duration, which can be associated with an ultrafast purely electronic optical behavior exhibited by the nanostructures.

Ablation was not observed in the sample during femtosecond experiments up to the maximum 3 nJ energy available, focused in a beam waist of approximately 47 [micro]m. Furthermore, picosecond ultraviolet damage of the sample was observed with 0.2 J/[cm.sup.2] pulses. This ablation threshold magnitude corresponds to a single shot focused on an area with 0.1 mm radius in the waist, 355 nm wavelength, and 65 [micro]J.

The ultraviolet transmittance of the sample, T, was measured as a function of the input irradiance, [I.sub.o]. The results that correspond to [T.sup.-1] versus [I.sub.o] are plotted in Figure 6. An error bar of [+ or -]10% was estimated for the irradiance data. The dots in the graph correspond to experimental data and the lines are related to numerical fits adjusted by considering the total irradiance of the incident beam as [I.sub.o] and the transmitted irradiance I(L) as

I (L) = [[I.sub.o] exp (-[[alpha].sub.o]L)]/ [1 + [beta][I.sub.o][L.sub.eff]. (6)

Expression (6) clearly shows that the inverse of the transmittance ([T.sup.-1]) is a linear function of input irradiance, with the slope related to the two-photon absorption coefficient [beta]. Figure 6 shows the experimental results plotted as [T.sup.-1] versus [I.sub.0], together to linear fits to the data at the two repetition rates employed. A clear divergence in the behavior of the inverse of the transmittance as a function on the irradiance at two different repetition rates can be observed in Figure 6. By using a repetition rate of 1 Hz, induced transparency (saturable absorption) is obtained, while the increase in the repetition rate to 10Hz notably produces the signature of a multiphotonic absorption (induced absorption) process in the sample. The fit to the data yields [beta] = -2.4 x [10.sup.-9] m/W for the 1 Hz data set and [beta] = 2.1 x [10.sup.-9] m/W for the 10 Hz set, and the values are contained in Table 1. We confirmed the possibility of controlling the slope of the nonlinear transmittance with the modification of the repetition rate from 1 Hz to 10 Hz. The numerical solution of the 2D heat equation expressed in (5) and experimental results showed in Figure 7 demonstrated that a photothermal process takes place in the picosecond experiments when the repetition rate is increased. Apparently, the change in dynamics of the energy deposited gives rise to a remarkable modification in the nonlinear ultraviolet absorbance transitions. Usually, in order that saturable absorption can be present, there should be an absorption resonance close to the excitation wavelength as it corresponds to our experiments at a 355 nm. Subsequently, we inferred that this change in nonlinear transmittance in the sample can be associated with a variation in the nonlinear ultraviolet absorbance resonance. This last inference implies a potential tuning of the two-photon absorption effect. Auger recombination and the temporal dynamics related to the photonic interaction in the sample may receive an important energy contribution that could modify the valence band electron density, automatically affecting the absorption as a function on the irradiance. The irradiance magnitude used in this work is enough to increase the probability to get two pairs of e-h (excitons) per SiQDs. Auger recombination in SiQDs, due to Coulomb interactions between carriers, is very fast (about 10 ps to 100 ns) and it limits the number of excitons per SiQDs to a maximum of two. Then, as the energy of the incident pulse increases, it is expected that a larger number of SiQDs with two excitons also increase until a saturated behavior is reached; this can explain the induced transparency observed in Figures 3 and 6 [21]. On the other hand, if the repetition rate of laser pulses is increased, two effects could take place: intraband absorption of electrons in the excited state [22] or biexciton emission [23] and both effects can explain the reduced transmittance of the SiQDs observed in this work. Biexciton deexcitation is a very inefficient process, but it is enhanced for higher temperatures and stronger laser intensities. The decay time for biexciton emission is of the order of Auger recombination, and it corresponds to a decay time of the order of 30 ns for SiQDs. The lifetime related to the release of excited states in ion-implanted SiQDs is governed by an exponential beta function that results from the interaction between the electrical fields emitted by different SiQDs. This situation typically originates stored excitation energy as slow as 100 [micro]s; comparative experimental fluorescence studies are in good agreement with this asseveration [10]. Taking into account the lifetime of excited transitions in SiQDs, differences in the nonlinear optical behavior exhibited by Figure 6 can receive an important influence from intraband and Auger effects processes which are more likely to occur for 10 Hz rather than 1 Hz pulse rate. On the other hand, intraband absorption processes can result after photon excitation into the conduction band of the SiQDs. Then electrons decay quickly (subpicoseconds) to the lowest energy state within the conduction band. At the same time, this excited electron may also make an electronic transition to higher energy level by absorbing another incoming photon [22]. Therefore, the increase in absorbed energy from the laser pulses reduces the transmittance of the sample.

In order to experimentally identify if a photothermal process would be responsible for our observations, the sample temperature was monitored. Using a single-beam irradiation with a 1 Hz repetition rate no temperature change was observed up to the ablation threshold levels; however a noticeable induced temperature change was recorded with a 10 Hz repetition rate. Figure 7 shows the induced temperature change in the sample when ultraviolet picosecond pulses irradiated the sample with a 10 Hz repetition rate. This experiment corresponds to an irradiation time of 10 seconds regarding the fact that the results were compared for repetition rates of 1 Hz and 10 Hz.

The change in temperature described by Figure 7 concerns 10 seconds of optical irradiation followed by the evolution of the heat dissipation with a 1/e decay close to 1 second. A significant temperature variation could be responsible for nonlinear refraction and for that reason the third-order nonlinear ultraviolet response of the sample was explored by a self-diffraction technique [19]. The optical Kerr effect can be derived from different physical mechanisms of nonlinear refractive index. A thermal process can be associated with a thermooptic coefficient that may be important for the modification of self-diffraction phenomena obtained by two-wave mixing experiments. The rotation of the angle between the planes of polarization of two incident beams in the sample allows analyzing the vectorial self-diffracted behavior. In Figure 8 representative self-diffraction signals obtained by a two-wave mixing experiment are shown; the repetition rate of the laser excitation was 10 Hz in this case. The nonzero value of the self-diffracted signal obtained by orthogonal polarization of the incident beams indicates an electronic mechanism as the main responsible for the optical Kerr effect induced in the sample by third-order nonlinearities [23]. The self-diffraction system was calibrated by using a well-known [CS.sub.2] standard sample. An error bar of [+ or -]10% was estimated for the experimental data. Using (4), [absolute value of ([[chi].sup.(3)])] = 1.05 x [10.sup.-10] esu value was estimated, corresponding to the SiQDs sample studied in this picosecond regime at 355 nm.

We considered the relationship between the nonlinear refractive index [n.sub.2] and [beta] with [[chi].sup.(3)] [24]:

[[chi].sup.(3)] = [n.sub.0]c/[7.91 x [10.sup.2]] [n.sub.2] + i [n.sup.2.sub.0]c[lambda]/[[pi].sup.2] [beta], (7)

where [lambda] represents the wavelength, c is the speed of the light in vacuum, and [n.sub.0] the refractive index for low intensity (in esu units). When substituting in (7) the magnitudes for [lambda] = 355 nm, c = 3 x [10.sup.8] m/s, [n.sub.0] = 1.42, [absolute value of ([[chi].sup.(3)])] = 1.05 x [10.sup.-10] esu, and the [beta] value obtained by the single-beam transmittance experiments, the nonlinear refractive index was calculated. The nonlinear parameters are summarized in Table 1. It can be considered that different contributions from free carriers, bound electrons, and thermal effects generate the strong differences in the femtosecond and picosecond response at the different wavelengths studied. Nonlinear optical effects are strongly dependent on shape and size of Si nanoparticles. Nevertheless, these results are in good agreement with previous investigations performed with silicon nanoparticles measured at different wavelengths [25].

Differences in nonlinear optical parameters described in Table 1 concern to irradiance, pulse duration, and wavelength variations for performing the experiments. These factors can be related to the dynamic response of electronic and thermal effects that should be present in the samples studied. The idea behind the fact that thermal effects play a key role in the difference comes from the numerical analysis and experimental observation of the changes in temperature illustrated in Figure 7. The intense nonlinear ultraviolet absorption properties exhibited by the SiQDs seem to be adequate to control discrete high-energy photonic interactions. In this respect, we consider the possibility of modifying the physical mechanism responsible for absorptive nonlinearity to modulate quantum processes in SiQDs by ultraviolet nonlinearities. It has been previously reported that two-photon absorption can be switched to saturated absorption in nanostructures by changing the wavelength that gives rise to the nonlinearity [26]. Moreover, it has been pointed out that the size, shape, and spatial distribution of nanoparticles can play a key role for the change of their characteristic nonlinear optical effects [27]. Figure 9 illustrates the nonlinear ultraviolet single-beam transmittance exhibited by the sample at two different repetition rates; here [f.sub.0] = 10 Hz and [f.sub.1] = 1 Hz represent binary PDM signals with 10 Hz describing the 0 logic value and 1 Hz corresponding to the 1 logic value. These plotted results (Figure 9) correspond to nonlinear demodulation based on SiQDs interacting with PDM signals in the proposed sample. From Figure 9 it can be seen that the sample acts like a low-pass filter for ultraviolet high-irradiance pulses. The difference between the magnitudes for the transmitted probe irradiances can be tailored by the synergy of different collections of SiQDs.

Considering that the temporal dynamics of energy transfer mechanisms can be employed for manipulating nonlinear transmittance processes, then the ability for demodulating PDM signals by nanostructures with ultrafast response can be contemplated. Important enhancement in refractive and absorptive nonlinearities was observed by infrared studies in comparison to ultraviolet results in our SiQDs. But remarkably, switching in the mechanism responsible for femtosecond absorption was observed in comparison to similar SiQDs measured by different input intensities [28].

Recent progress related to the development of nonlinear photonic systems with potential quantum functions has gained considerable attention by several research groups [29]. The possibility of manipulating low-dimensional signals for instrumentation and processing information is still a challenge that may take advantages of nanomaterials science and applied optics [30]. Encoding and ciphering processes constitute a clear example that advanced materials are currently required to improve the performance of their encrypting characteristics. Taking into account the opportunity to control all-optical interactions by nonlinear phenomena in SiQDs, diverse nanophotonic devices assisted by isolated nanoparticles can be envisioned. On the other hand, energy transfer based on SiQDs can play a fundamental role in applications that would be tuned by multiphotonic nonlinearities. In this work a clear indication about new possibilities for tailoring nanostructured samples to be used for ultrafast electromagnetic functions based on nonlinear excitations is highlighted.

4. Conclusions

Within this work the nonlinear infrared and ultraviolet properties exhibited by ion-implanted SiQDs in silica plates were analyzed. Strong absorptive and refractive nonlinearities effects were observed by ultrashort pulses at 830 nm and 355 nm wavelengths. The ability of the nanostructures studied for demodulating PDM signals by distinct near-resonance nonlinearities was pointed out. The increase in the pulse repetition rate of the laser system can result in the switch from saturated absorption to two-photon absorption in the sample, allowing attractive applications to be considered. This report emphasizes the need for attention of absorptive nonlinearities in controlled photothermal phenomena associated with silicon-based nanomaterials. The implications of these results may have the potential to develop low-dimensional all-optical modulating systems.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3470167

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors kindly acknowledge the financial support from CICESE, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, through Grant SIP20170498, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico through Grants DGAPA-UNAMIN108217 and IN110216, and CONACyT through Grants 222485 and CB-2015-251201. The authors wish to thank K. Lopez and F. J. Jaimes for running the accelerator and J. G. Morales for his assistance during the sample preparation.

References

[1] Yu. Le, H. Han, W. H. Bin et al., "Complex hollow nanostructures: synthesis and energy-related applications," Advanced Materials, vol. 29, no. 15, pp. 1521-4095, 2017.

[2] P. Dong, Y. Chen, G. Duan, D. Neilson, and D. T. Neilson, "Silicon photonic devices and integrated circuits," Nanophotonics, vol. 3, pp. 215-228, 2014.

[3] D. Wang, L. Huo, Q. Wang, and C. Lou, "Performance optimization of ultra-short optical pulse generation based on Mamyshev reshaping and its application in 100-Gb/s and 200-Gb/s optical time-division multiplexing," Optics Communications, vol. 364, pp. 76-82, 2016.

[4] J. Leuthold, C. Koos, and W. Freude, "Nonlinear silicon photonics," Nature Photonics, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 535-544, 2010.

[5] S. Isabelle and S. Jorg, "Metamaterial-inspired silicon nanophotonics," Nature Photonics, vol. 11, pp. 274-284, 2017.

[6] P. I. Borel, B. Bilenberg, L. H. Frandsenet al., "Imprinted silicon-based nanophotonics," Optics Express, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1261-1266, 2007.

[7] A. E. Krasnok, A. E. Miroshnichenko, P. A. Belov, and Y. S. Kivshar, "All-dielectric optical nanoantennas," Optics Express, vol. 20, no. 18, pp. 20599-20604, 2012.

[8] D. H. Spadoti, L. H. Gabrielli, C. B. Poitras, and M. Lipson, "Focusing light in a curved-space," Optics Express, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 3181-3186, 2010.

[9] M. R. Shcherbakov, D. N. Neshev, B. Hopkins et al., "Enhanced third-harmonic generation in silicon nanoparticles driven by magnetic response," Nano Letters, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 6488-6492, 2014.

[10] J. Bornacelli, J. A. Reyes Esqueda, L. Rodriguez Fernandez, and

A. Oliver, "Improving passivation process of Si nanocrystals embedded in SiOUsing Metal Ion Implantation," Journal of Nanotechnology, vol. 2013, Article ID 736478, 2013.

[11] S. Liu, G. A. Keeler, J. L. Reno, M. B. Sinclair, and I. Brener, "III-V Semiconductor Nanoresonators--A New Strategy for Passive, Active, and Nonlinear All-Dielectric Metamaterials," Advanced Optical Materials, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1457-1462, 2016.

[12] B. Shen, P. Wang, R. Polson, and R. Menon, "An integrated-nanophotonics polarization beamsplitter with 2.4x2.4 [micro][m.sup.2] footprint," Nature Photonics, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 378-382, 2015.

[13] P. J. Bock, P. Cheben, J. H. Schmid et al., "Subwavelength grating crossings for siliconwirewaveguides," Optics Express, vol. 18, no. 15, pp. 16146-16155, 2010.

[14] M. R. Shcherbakov, P. P. Vabishchevich, A. S. Shorokhov et al., "Ultrafast all-optical switching with magnetic resonances in nonlinear dielectric nanostructures," Nano Lett, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 6985-6990, 2015.

[15] P. Cheben, P. J. Bock, J. H. Schmid et al., "Refractive index engineering with subwavelength gratings for efficient microphotonic couplers and planar waveguide multiplexers," Optics Letters, vol. 35, no. 15, pp. 2526-2528, 2010.

[16] G. T. Reed, Silicon Photonics: The State of the Art, Wiley-Interscience, 2008.

[17] M. Sheik-Bahae, A. A. Said, T. H. Wei, D. J. Hagan, and E. W. van Stryland, "Sensitive measurement of optical nonlinearities using a single beam," IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 760-769, 1990.

[18] C. Torres-Torres, A. Lopez-Suarez, B. Can-Uc, R. Rangel-Rojo, L. Tamayo-Rivera, and A. Oliver, "Collective optical Kerr effect exhibited by an integrated configuration of silicon quantum dots and gold nanoparticles embedded in ion-implanted silica," Nanotechnology, vol. 26, no. 29, Article ID 295701, 2015.

[19] C. Torres-Torres, J. A. Reyes-Esqueda, J. C. Cheang-Wong, A. Crespo-Sosa, L. Rodriguez-Fernandez, and A. Oliver, "Optical third-order nonlinearity by nanosecond and picosecond pulses in Cu nanoparticles in ion-implanted silica," Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 104, no. 1, Article ID 014306, 2008.

[20] J. F. Ziegler, J. P. Biersack, and M. D. Ziegler, SRIM--The Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter, Ion Implantation Press, 2008, http://www.srim.org.

[21] P. M. Fauchet, "Light emission from Si quantum dots," Materials Today, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 26-33, 2005.

[22] Y. Qu, W. Ji, Y. Zheng, and J. Y. Ying, "Auger recombination and intraband absorption of two-photon-excited carriers in colloidal CdSe quantum dots," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 90, no. 13, Article ID 133112, 2007.

[23] F. Pevere, I. Sychugov, F. Sangghaleh, A. Fucikova, and J. Linnros, "Biexciton emission as a probe of auger recombination in individual silicon nanocrystals," The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 119, no. 13, pp. 7499-7505, 2015.

[24] R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 1992.

[25] S. Hernandez, P. Pellegrino, A. Martinez et al., "Linear and nonlinear optical properties of Si nanocrystals in Si O2 deposited by plasma-enhanced chemical-vapor deposition," Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 103, no. 6, Article ID 064309, 2008.

[26] Q. Lin, O. J. Painter, and G. P. Agrawal, "Nonlinear optical phenomena in silicon waveguides: Modeling and applications," Optics Express, vol. 15, no. 25, pp. 16604-16644, 2007.

[27] K. Ikeda, R. E. Saperstein, N. Alic, and Y. Fainman, "Thermal and Kerr nonlinear properties of plasma-deposited silicon nitride/ silicon dioxide waveguides," Optics Express, vol. 16, no. 17, pp. 12987-12994, 2008.

[28] A. Lopez-Suarez, C. Torres-Torres, B. Can-Uc, R. Rangel-Rojo, C. E. Valencia, and A. Oliver, "Third order nonlinear optical properties exhibited by a bilayer configuration of silver nanoparticles integrated to silicon nanocrystals embedded in ion-implanted silica," JOSA B-Optical Physics, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 805-811, 2015.

[29] H. Chen, H. Liu, Z. Zhang, K. Hu, and X. Fang, "Nanostructured Photodetectors: FromUltraviolet to Terahertz," Advanced Materials, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 403-433, 2016.

[30] D. Kufer and G. Konstantatos, "Photo-FETs: Phototransistors Enabled by 2D and 0D Nanomaterials," ACS Photonics, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 2197-2210, 2016.

C. Torres-Torres [ID], (1) J. Bornacelli [ID], (2) R. Rangel-Rojo, (3) J. A. Garcia-Merino, (1) B. Can-Uc, (4) L. Tamayo-Rivera, (5) J. C. Cheang-Wong, (2) L. Rodriguez-Fernandez [ID], (2) and A. Oliver (2)

(1) Seccion de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigacion, Escuela Superior de Ingenieria Mecanica y Electrica Unidad Zacatenco, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, 07738 Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico

(2) Instituto de Fisica, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, 04510 Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico

(3) Departamento de Optica, Centro de Investigacion Cientifica y de Educacion Superior de Ensenada, A. P. 360, 22860 Ensenada, BC, Mexico

(4) Centro de Nanociencias y Nanotecnologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, A. P. 14, 22800 Ensenada, BC, Mexico

(5) Escuela Superior de Apan, Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Hidalgo, 43920 Apan, HGO, Mexico

Correspondence should be addressed to C. Torres-Torres; crstorres@yahoo.com.mx

Received 16 November 2017; Revised 28 December 2017; Accepted 24 January 2018; Published 20 February 2018

Academic Editor: Sergio Obregon

Caption: Figure 1: Panoramic STEM micrograph of a representative sample with embedded SiQDs.

Caption: Figure 2: Optical absorption spectra of the sample with embedded SiQDs and the pristine silica.

Caption: Figure 3: Femtosecond open-aperture z-scan data at 830 nm.

Caption: Figure 4: Femtosecond closed-aperture z-scan data at 830 nm.

Caption: Figure 5: Time-resolved OKG signal for the SiQDs samples studied.

Caption: Figure 6: Contrast in the experimental inverse of the transmittance as a function of the incident irradiance at 355 nm and 25 ps in propagation through the SiQDs sample studied at two different repetition rates: 1 Hz or 10 Hz.

Caption: Figure 7: Experimental and numerical photothermal response exhibited by the SiQDs sample exposed to picosecond laser pulsed irradiation at 355 nm wavelength.

Caption: Figure 8: Normalized probe transmittance as a function of the angle of polarization between the interacting beams in the SiQDs sample studied.

Caption: Figure 9: PDM signals demodulated by third-order nonlinear ultraviolet effects exhibited by SiQDs in silica. The irradiation was carried out by picosecond pulses at 355 nm and repetition rates of 1 Hz or 10 Hz.
Table 1: Nonlinear infrared and ultraviolet coefficients estimated.

                                                   [n.sub.2]
Laser irradiation          [beta] (m/W)          ([m.sup.2]/W)

830 nm, 80 fs, 94 MHz    1.6 x [10.sup.-7]    2.11 x [10.sup.-14]
355 nm, 25 ps, 10 Hz     2.1 x [10.sup.-9]    1.21 x [10.sup.-16]
355 nm, 25 ps, 1 Hz     -2.4 x [10.sup.-9]

                        [absolute value of
                        ([[chi].sup.(3)])]
Laser irradiation              (esu)

830 nm, 80 fs, 94 MHz    1.8 x [10.sup.-8]
355 nm, 25 ps, 10 Hz    1.05 x [10.sup.-10]
355 nm, 25 ps, 1 Hz
COPYRIGHT 2018 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Torres-Torres, C.; Bornacelli, J.; Rangel-Rojo, R.; Garcia-Merino, J. A.; Can-Uc, B.; Tamayo-Rivera,
Publication:Journal of Nanomaterials
Geographic Code:1MEX
Date:Jan 1, 2018
Words:5644
Previous Article:Graphene Synthesis Using a CVD Reactor and a Discontinuous Feed of Gas Precursor at Atmospheric Pressure.
Next Article:Antifungal Activity of ZnO and MgO Nanomaterials and Their Mixtures against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Strains from Tropical Fruit.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |