Printer Friendly

Phenology of African mahogany plants submitted to irrigation.

Introduction

In the last decades, forest plantations have stood out as an alternative for the recovery deforested, altered and degraded areas. Studies on technical, economic and financial viability for the planting of African mahogany ( Khaya ivorensis A. Chev.) show that the species can contribute to the Brazilian economy by generating better opportunities for rural activities and national and international income, since it can provide a significant financial return, when compared to other forest species (Gomes, 2010; Danquah et al., 2011).

One of the reasons for the introduction of African mahogany in Brazil is its resistance to one of the main pests that attacks the native mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla King), named meliaceae shoot borer (Hypsipyla grandella Zeller - Lepidoptera: Pyralidae ), whose larvae destroy the apical region of the host plant and cause deformation and scraping, resulting in wood depreciation (Newton et al., 2007, Opuni-Frimpong et al., 2008). In Brazil, the cultivation of the exotic meliaceae replacing mainly the native Amazon mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla King) is recommended by research and teaching institutions (Falesi & Baena, 1999; Castro et al., 2008), while an ecological management program for H. grandella is not established.

Due to the recent introduction of African mahogany cultivation in Brazil, when compared to other countries, such as Costa Rica, there is a lack of conclusive studies evaluating the economic viability of forests planted with this plant species, as well as their social and economic benefits and e environmental impacts. However, it is currently estimated the amount of one million of trees planted, mainly in the Para State, in the Amazon, being this crop, in general, associated with silvopastoral systems, agroforestry or in homogeneous plantations, aiming the wood exportation (Gomes, 2010, Albuquerque et al., 2013).

On the other hand, in regions submitted to water deficiency, the growth of this species is limited, as it interferes by altering its metabolism (Albuquerque et al., 2013; Barkla et al., 2013). Seasonal water deficit can exert a marked effect on seedlings and young plants, whose root systems would be more exposed to water scarcity in the superficial layers of the soil, characterizing the dry season (Lambers et al., 2008; Chaves et al., 2009).

Although rainfall in the Cerrado of the Goias State is greater than 1,400 mm [year.sup.-1], higher than the need for average irrigation (1200 mm [year.sup.-1]) for some tree species, it is expected that African mahogany plants, when submitted to irrigation, during drought period in the Cerrado, present higher growth and development than non-irrigated plants, allowing an earlier cut.

Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the phenometric responses of African mahogany young plants submitted to irrigation.

Material and Methods

The experiment was carried out in the experimental area of the Mudas Nobres Company, located in Bonfinopolis-GO, Brazil (16 (o) 35 '49 "S, 49[degrees] 16' 39" W, 780 m of altitude). The climate of the region, according to Koppen, was classified as Aw, tropical savannah, megathermic. The average minimum temperature is 14.3[degrees]C and the maximum temperature is 31.5[degrees]C, with an average annual temperature of 23.0[degrees]C. The average annual radiation is 2,319 h. The pluvial regime is well defined, covering a rainy period (October to April) and a dry season (May to September), with an average annual rainfall of 1,487 mm. The annual average for relative air humidity (UR) is 71%, with August being the driest month (UR = 49%). The average annual evaporation measured by Class A tank is 1,915 mm. The strongest winds (average 7 km [h.sup.-1]) occurs in the month of August (Silva et al., 2007).

The soil is a dystrophic Red Latosol, with clay texture, evergreen cerrado (Brazilian savannah) with a flat relief (Silva et al., 2007). Before sowing, the soil and chemical analysis were carried out at the depths of 0.0-0.20 m and 0.200.40 m. After the analysis, the standards of 'Bulletin 100' for liming and fertilization of the area were followed, incorporating an amount of dolomitic limestone sufficient to raise the base saturation to 70% three months before planting (December 2011). The fertilization of planting was of 100 g [P.sub.2][O.sub.5], per hole, using the simple superphosphate. In addition, six cover fertilizations were carried out on every two months with 50 g of [Nh.sub.4]S[O.sub.4] and 25 of KCl (450 g of [plant.sup.-1] [year.sup.-1]).

The seedlings were transplanted on March 6, 2012, containing one plant per hole, with dimensions of 0.30 x 0.30 x 0.30 m and plant spacing of 5 x 5 m, totaling 50 plants, in a 4 ha planted forest area. At the planting the plants were 30 days old and had averages of diameter, total height and height of stem of 8 mm, 0.75 m and 0.32 m, respectively. The plants were produced in using seeds from the Para State, Brazil. The area was prepared with a plowing and two harrowings, subsoiling the planting line. Before application, the herbicide Glyphosate (3 L.[ha.sup.-1]) was applied. Right after the planting, a manual irrigation was done (5 L.[plant.sup.-1]). Almost two months after planting a conventional sprinkler irrigation system was installed, replacing water according to the crop evapotranspiration. Irrigation management was done through the atmospheric water demand, estimated by the reference evapotranspiration (E[T.sub.0]), by the Thornthwaite Camargo method, in the first year of cultivation; however, for the second year the E[T.sub.0] was determined by Penman-Monteith (FAO Standard). This was due to the lack of meteorological data, since the automated station (Davis Vantage PRO2) was installed at the second year, collecting data on minimum and maximum temperature, solar radiation, relative air humidity, wind speed and rainfall. In the first year of evaluation, only air temperature, relative humidity and rainfall were obtained, from a digital thermo-hygrometer and a rain-gauge.

In the period from May, 2012 to November, 2013 the irrigated treatment was established, replacing 100% of the crop potential evapotranspiration (ETC), using the KC recommendation of KC = 0.5 in the first year; KC = 0.7 in the second year (Allen et al., 1998), since there are no recommendations of these values for African mahogany plants.

Growth analyzes were performed twice a month in 10 plants, five of which were irrigated and five were non-irrigated: i) plant height (PH) - measurements from the plant soil surface to the apex; (Ii) stem height (SH) - measure from the soil surface to the insertion of the first leaf; (Iii) stem diameter (SD) - measured 3 cm from the soil surface; Iv) number of leaves (NL) and leaflets (NLL) - the total number of leaves and leaflets per plant were counted; V) leaf area: leaf area (LA) was estimated from leaf length (L) and width (W) of the leaflets (50 leaflets per plant), in order to obtain a regression equation (LA=0.9223LW+294.2; [R.sup.2]=0,92) comparing the leaf area determined by the length and width measurements, as a function of the leaf area determined by the disk method (Eq. 1):

LA= [(ND*AD)*LTDM]/DTDM (1)

in which: LA - is the leaf area ([cm.sup.2]), ND - the number of discs used, AD - the disk area, using a metallic driller with known diameter ([cm.sup.2]), LTDM - leaves total dry mass G), MSTD--discs total dry mass (g); Vi) leaf expansion (LE) - length and width of 9 measured leaves per plant, 3 of each vegetative canopy extract (1/3 of upper, medium and lower). The calculation of plant growth rates was also performed.

The experiment was carried out in a completely randomized design, in a bifactorial 2x9 scheme (A: two irrigated and non-irrigated water regimes, and D: nine evaluation times- 0, 120, 180, 240, 300, 360, 420, 480 and 540 days after transplanting - DAT), with five repetitions. The data were submitted to analysis of variance by the F test, and the means were compared by the Tukey's test at 5% of error probability. The Levene test was used to test the homogeneity of the variances and the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality of the errors, both at 5%.

Results and Discussion

Positive exponential equations were adjusted to the phenometric variables of the plants as a function of the nine evaluations, twice a month, indicating higher plant growth in irrigated plants, when compared to plants without irrigation (Figure 1).

This lower growth may indicate the crop sensitivity to water deficit, and it can be inferred that the plant efficiently controls water losses by regulating the stomatal opening, as already observed in young mahogany plants of other S. macrophylla (Cordeiro et al. 2009) and Carapa guianensis (Goncalves et al., 2009) species, both from the same family as K. ivorensis (Meliaceae).

There was a significant interaction between irrigated and non-irrigated treatments, and evaluation times for the averages and rates of the evaluated variables (Table 1).

For all evaluations during the 18 months, no wilt or senescence of the mahogany plants were observed as according to water deficit and it can be inferred that this species has tolerance to this condition (Albuquerque et al., 2013; Chaves et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2015).

Young plants of African mahogany have a high stomatal sensitivity to water deficiency, which, together with the proline accumulation, can lead to a moderate water stress of the species. In addition, the water status of the plants and the gas exchange are fully recovered after plants rehydration (Albuquerque et al., 2013). According to Flexas & Medrano (2002), the lowest plant growth recorded in plants submitted to water deficit may occur due to stomatal limitation to C[O.sub.2] influx, photochemical damage of the photosynthetic system, reduction in ATP synthesis, and decrease in Rubisco activity (Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase) or its rate of regeneration.

The treatments, irrigated and non-irrigated, showed significant differences and for the evaluation time, being the highest averages observed in irrigated plants (Table 1). Growth rates were also evaluated, where a significant interaction between irrigated and non-irrigated treatments was evidenced, as well as the different evaluation times (Figure 2). Highest averages of growth rates were observed in irrigated plants for all evaluated variables, except for stem diameter (SD). On average, irrigated plants presented PH rates of 0.70 cm.[day.sup.-1], SH of 0.40 cm.[day.sup.-1], NL of 0.22 leaves.[plant.sup.-1], NLL of 4.33 leaflets.[plant.sup.-1], SD of 0.017 cm.[day.sup.-1] and LA of 80.57 [cm.sup.-2].[day.sup.-1]. For non-irrigated plants these averages were PH 0.51 cm.[day.sup.-1], SH 0.11 cm.[day.sup.-1], NL 0.17 leaves.[plant.sup.-1], NLL 2.78 leaflets.[plant.sup.-1], SD 0.016 cm.[day.sup.-1] and LA 63.27 [cm.sup.-2].[day.sup.-1].

Young plants of Brazilian mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla King), cultivated in soil water contents close to the field capacity, also recorded higher values of plant height (116%), leaf area (200%) and stem diameter (50% ) when compared to plants in water deficit (Cordeiro et al., 2009). On the other hand, plants under water stress presented a reduction in the number of leaves and leaflets and, consequently, in the total leaf area, but no effects were detected at plant height and stem diameter (Cordeiro et al., 2009). The authors report that this can be explained by the increase of proline (400%), minimizing the effect of drought (Cordeiro et al., 2009). Other studies, also with Khaya ivorensis, detected higher growth of plant height (23%), stem height (28%) and stem diameter (21%) in drip irrigated plants compared to non irrigated plants, also in the 'Cerrado' biome of the Goias State (Barbosa, 2014).

The highest values of plant height (PH), number of leaves (NL), number of leaflets (NLL) and leaf area (LA) were recorded in the last evaluation (540 days after transplanting - DAT). However, the highest stem height (SH) and SD rates were observed at 360 DAT and 300 DAT, respectively. The fact that the highest rates occurred for most variables in the last evaluation time may be due to the full adaptation of the plants in the area, as well as their response to rehydration (Cordeiro et al., 2009, Albuquerque et al. 2013), considering that there was an excess of water from the 10th (300 DAT) to the 15th (450 DAT) months of evaluation (Figure 3).

The significant interaction between water regimes (irrigated and non-irrigated) and the time of evaluation showed a difference between the growth rates according to time, with the highest averages recorded in the irrigated treatment at 540 DAP, for the rate of the variables PH, NL, NLL and LA, although some of these variables did not present significant differences in other evaluation times (Figure 2).

Periods of water deficit were recorded from July 2012 to December 2012, and from July 2013 to November 2013. Some evaluations were carried out during these periods of water deficit (120, 180, 240, 480 and 540 DAP) (Figure 3), which may explain the higher rates observed in irrigated plants for most variables. The SH rate also obtained the highest averages in the irrigated treatment, but at 360 DAP (March / 2013), where there no deficit was recorded (Figure 3), this may have occurred because the non-irrigated plants are recovering from a period of drought, not responding positively, even under favorable conditions of water content in the soil. Some studies confirm the cumulative effect of water stress, in which the plants submitted to the deficit may not recover their potential C[O.sub.2] assimilation due to possible damages to the photochemical and / or biochemical fixation apparatus of C[O.sub.2] (Shinozaki & Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, 2007, Albuquerque et al., 2013).

The highest SD rates (Figure 2) were observed at 300 DAP (January / 2013), beginning of the rainy season in the region (Figure 3), showing no significant differences between the water regime treatments, (Figure 2), at 480 DAP (July / 2013), period of water deficit (Figure 3).

It was verified a cyclical behavior in the treatments of water regime as a function of time, being the highest averages observed for irrigated plats. Higher leaf area (LA) rates were observed in irrigated plants at 120, 180, 300 and 540 DAT, and for non-irrigated plants at 420 and 480 DAP (Figure 2). The period corresponding to the highest LA rates of irrigated plants was marked by water deficit (Figure 2 and 3), except for 300 DAP (January / 2013), when the water excess period began. This may have occurred because irrigated plants had better physiological conditions for renewal, even after a decrease in the LA rates in November / 2012 (240 DAP).

On the other hand, the highest LA rates of the non-irrigated plants were observed during periods of water deficit, between May / 2013 and July / 2013, showing that the morphological characteristics of these plants, after passing through water deficit conditions, are significantly efficient and that there is no irreversible damage to the water absorption capacity by the roots and their transport to the aerial part.

Albuquerque et al. (2013) reported that non-irrigated African mahogany plants had complete recovery of their variables indicating gas exchange (C[O.sub.2] assimilation, stomatal conductance, transpiration, intercellular concentration and atmospheric C[O.sub.2] ratio) within seven days after irrigation resumption. These results indicate that species can retake its photosynthetic metabolism, guaranteeing the photoassimilates production, confirmed by the values found for soluble carbohydrates on the first day after rehydration and on the remaining days of evaluation. Similar results were observed in plants of Andiroba (C. guianensis) (Goncalves et al., 2009), Eucalyptus and Acacia spp. (Warren et al., 2011), submitted to water deficit and rehydration.

Conclusions

Irrigation of young plants of African mahogany result in higher plant growth, mainly during periods of water deficit in the 'Cerrado' biome of the Goias State.

References

Albuquerque, M.P. F. de, Moraes, F.K.C., Santos, R.I.N., Castro, G.L.S. de, Ramos, E.M.L.S., Pinheiro, H.A. 2013. Ecofisiologia de plantasjovens de mogno-africano submetidas a deficit hidrico e reidratacao. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 48: 9-16.

Allen, R.G.; Pereira, L.S.; Paes, D.; Smith, M. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Roma: FAO, 328p. (Irrigation and Drainage Paper, 56).

Barbosa, L.H.A. 2014. Irrigacao em plantas jovens de mogno africano (Kaya ivorensis) no cerrado. 106f. (Dissertacao de Mestrado) - Universidade Federal de Goias, Goiania, Brasil.

Barkla, B.J, Vera-Estrella, R., Pantoja, O. 2013. Progress and challenges for abiotic stress proteomics of crop plants. Proteomics 13:1801-1815.

Castro, A.C., Lourenco Junior, J.B., Santos, N.F.A., Monteiro, E.M.M., Aviz, M.A.B., Garcia, A.R. 2008. Sistema silvipastoril na Amazonia: ferramenta para elevar o desempenho produtivo de bufalos. Ciencia Rural 38: 2395-2402.

Chaves, M.M., Flexas, J., Pinheiro, C. 2009. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Annals of Botany 103:551-560.

Cordeiro, Y.E.M., Pinheiro, H.A., Santos-Filho, B.G. dos, Sofia S. Correa, S.S, Silva J.R.R. e, Dias-Filho, M.B. 2009. Physiological and morphological responses of young mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla King) plants to drought. Forest Ecology and Management 258: 1449-1455.

Danquah, A.J., Appiah, M., Ari, P. 2011. Ecogeographic variation in leaf morphology of african mohogany (Khaya anthotheca and Khaya ivorensis) provenance in gana. European Journal of Scientific Research 51:18-28.

Falesi, I.C., Baena, A.R.C. 1999. Mogno-africano Khaya ivorensis A. Chev. em sistema silvipastoril com leguminosa e revestimento natural do solo. Embrapa Amazonia Oriental, Belem, Brasil. 52 p.

Flexas, J., Medrano, H. 2002. Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C3 plants: stomatal and non-stomatal limitations revisited. Annals of Botany 89: 183-189.

Gomes, D.M. 2010. Analise de viabilidade tecnica, economico-financeiro para implantacao da cultura do Mogno-Africano (Khaya ivorensis A. Chev.) na regiao oeste de Minas Gerais. 69f. (Dissertacao de Especializacao em Gestao Florestal.) - Universidade Federal do Parana, Curitiba, Brasil.

Goncalves, J.F. de C.; Silva, C.E.M. da; Guimaraes, D.G. 2009. Fotossintese e potencial hidrico foliar de plantas jovens de andiroba submetidas a deficiencia hidrica e a reidratacao. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 44: 8-14.

Lambers, H., Chapin, F., Pons, T. 2008. Plant water relations. In: Lambers, H., Chapin, F., Pons, T. (ed.) Plant physiological ecology. Springer, New York. p.163-223.

Newton, A.C., Baker, P., Ramnarine, S., Mese'n, J.F., Leaky, R.R.B. 1993. The mahogany shoot borer: prospects for control. Forest Ecology and Management 57: 301-328.

Ofori, D. A., Opuni-Frimpong, E., Cobbinah, J.R. 2007. Provenance variation in Khaya species for growth and resistance to shoot borer Hypsipyla robusta. Forst Ecology and Management 242: 438-443.

Opuni-Frimpong, E., Karnosky, D. F., Storer, A. J., Cobbinah, J. R. 2008. Silvicultural systems for plantation mahogany in Africa: influences of canopy shade on tree growth and pest damage. Forest Ecology and Management 255: 328-333.

Shinozaki, K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. 2007. Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany 58:221-227.

Silva, S.C., Soares, E.G.S., Ribeiro, J.R. 2007. Informacoes meteorologicas para pesquisa e planejamento agricola, referentes ao municipio de Santo Antonio de Goias, GO de 2006. Embrapa arroz e feijao, Santo Antonio de Goias, Brasil. 31p.

Warren, C.R., Aranda, I., Cano, F.J. 2011. Responses to water stress of gas exchange and metabolites in Eucalyptus and Acacia spp. Plant, Cell and Environment 34: 1609-1629.

Zhao, P., Liu, P., Shao. J., Li, C., Wang, B., Guo, X., Yan, B., Xia, Y., Peng, M., 2015. Analysis of different strategies adapted by two cassava cultivars in response to drought stress: ensuring survival or continuing growth. Journal of Experimental Botany 66:1477-1488.

Derblai Casaroli (1*), Flavio de Oliveira Rosa (1), Jose Alves Junior (1), Adao Wagner Pego Evangelista (1)

(1) Federal University of Goias, Goiania, GO, Brazil

(*) Corresponding author, e-mail: derblai@ufg.br

Received: 08 May 2016

Accepted: 19 October 2016

DOI: 10.14295/CS.v8i2.1301
Table 1. Average of plant total height (PH, cm), stem height (SH, cm),
number of leaves (NL), number of leaflets (NLL), stem diameter (SD, cm)
and leaf area (LA, [cm.sup.2]), from nine evaluation performed in days
after transplantation (DAT), for African mahogany irrigated and not
irrigated plants. Bonfinopolis-GO, Brazil, 2012.

DAT   PH            SH          NL          NLL         SD
      Irrigated

  0   155.0 aB (*)  67.4 aC      42.0 aB     576.0 aA    4.8 aD
120   156.6 aB      45.0 aC      47.8 aB     551.0 aA    5.3 aD
180   192.6 aAB     76.6 aABC    56.4 aB     884.8 aA    5.7 aD
240   219.2 aAB     47.0 aBC     55.4 aB     760.4 aA    6.0 aCD
300   228.4 aAB     78.0 aC      67.6 aAB    958.0 aA    7.1 aCD
360   244.4 aAB     55.2 aAB     62.6 aAB    927.4 aA    7.2 aBC
420   274.4 aA      84.0 aBC     76.2 aAB   1361.0 aA    8.3 aBC
480   287.6 aA      62.4 aA      91.8 aAB   1359.9 aA    8.9 aAB
540   366.4 aA      89.4 aA     118.8 aA    2121.9 aA    9.1 aA
Mean  236.07        67.22        68.73      1055.60      6.93
CV%    24.10        20.70        26.82        33.83     12.22
Not Irrigated
  0    31.0 bD      23.2 bBCDE    9.2 bE      28.2 bC    0.8 bE
120    33.2 bD      20.8 bF       9.8 bDE     42.6 bC    0.9 bDE
180    55.6 bBCD    35.6 bABCD   10.0 bCDE    40.6 bC    0.9 bDE
240    56.2 bBCD    31.6 bEF     11.6 bCDE    71.8 bC    1.5 bCD
300    58.4 bBC     26.8 bABC    18.4 bCD    118.6 bBC   1.9 bBC
360    83.2 bBC     50.8 aDEF    25.6 bCDE   239.2 bC    2.4 bB
420    84.8 bB      31.8 bAF     23.4 bBC    157.8 bB    2.5 bA
480   120.8 bB      55.4 aCDEF   31.6 bB     310.2 bB    3.4 bA
540   123.6 bA      42.0 aABC    38.4 bA     398.4 bA    4.1 bA
Mean   71.87        35.33        19.78       156.38      2.04

DAT   LA

  0    734.5 aA
120    814.0 aA
180    897.3 aA
240    900.9 aA
300   1279.5 aA
360   1210.3 aA
420   1727.1 aA
480   1396.7 aA
540   2495.3 aA
Mean  1272.84
CV%     63.56
Not Irrigated
  0    22.0 bC
120    14.5 bC
180    30.3 bBC
240    57.2 bBC
300    45.8 bBC
360    56.5 bBC
420   116.1 bAB
480   123.6 bBC
540   462.8 bB
Mean  103.20

(*) Means followed by the same lowercase letter in the column and upper
case in the line are not statistically different according to Tukey's
test at 5% of probability level.
COPYRIGHT 2017 Federal University of Piaui
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Article
Author:Casaroli, Derblai; Rosa, Flavio de Oliveira; Junior, Jose Alves; Evangelista, Adao Wagner Pego
Publication:Comunicata Scientiae
Article Type:Report
Date:Apr 1, 2017
Words:3823
Previous Article:Agronomic aspects of two Physalis species as a function of Nitrogen fertilization.
Next Article:Correlations and path analysis for fruit yield in pepper lines (Capsicum chinense L.).
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters