Printer Friendly

Phelps v. Kapnolas.

U.S. Appeals Court

NUTRITION

Phelps v. Kapnolas, 308 F.3d 180 (2nd Cir. 2002). A state inmate brought a [section] 1983 action alleging violation of his Eighth Amendment rights resulting from his placement on a nutritionally inadequate diet. The district court dismissed the complaint. The appeals court reversed and remanded with instructions. The court held that the inmate stated an Eighth Amendment violation with his allegations that prison officials deprived him of a nutritionally adequate diet for 14 days, and that they knew this deprivation was likely to inflict pain and suffering. (Southport Correctional Facility, New York)
COPYRIGHT 2003 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:FOOD; case regarding prisoners rights
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U2NY
Date:Feb 1, 2003
Words:98
Previous Article:Allah v. Al-Hafeez.
Next Article:Ashker v. California Dept. of Corrections.
Topics:


Related Articles
Koger v. Snyder.
Koger v. Snyder.
Koger v. Snyder.
Koger v. Snyder.
Singleton v. Norris.
Rodriguez v. Ames.
Boyd v. Anderson.
Boyd v. Anderson.
Habeas corpus.
Programs-prisoner.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters