Printer Friendly

Performance and feeding preference of Cornops aquaticum (Orthoptera: Acrididae) on Eichhornia crassipes and crop plants in native area.


The semiaquatic grasshopper Cornops aquaticum Bruner, which is highly specific of Eichhornia crassipes (Pontederiaceae), constitutes one of the most abundant herbivores in the Neotropical wetlands and a possible biological control agent of this weed in South Africa. The aims of this study were 1) to assess the performance of each age category of C. aquaticum on crop plants and the host plant E. crassipes; 2) to assess the feeding preference of this grasshopper on crop plants in the presence and absence of E. crassipes; and 3) to determine the presence of nymphs and adults of this grasshopper on crops and in the adjacent wetlands where Eichhornia plants are present. Crop plants included in this study were Zea mays, Oryza sativa, Saccharum officinarum and Ilex paraguariensis. The age categories of C. aquaticum population were nymphs A (instar I and II), nymphs B (instar III to VI) and adults (females and males). To assess grasshopper performance on E. crassipes and crop plants, survival and oviposition were recorded during the no-choice tests. To evaluate feeding preference, choice tests with crop plants in the presence and absence of E. crassipes were performed. Abundance of C. aquaticum in the crop patches and the wetlands vegetation was assessed usingan entomological net. During the no-choice tests, high survival of most C. aquaticum individuals was observed on Z. mays and E. crassipes, except for nymphs A fed on Z. mays. Ovipositions were registered in E. crassipes, Z. mays and S. officinarum, but only eggs laid in E. crassipes were endophytic and viable. C. aquaticum showed high preference to E. crassipes, whereas Z. mays and S. officinarum were the preferred plants in the choice test without E. crassipes. We did not find C. aquaticum individuals in the crop patches of Z. mays, O. sativa and S. officinarum, whereas abundance of this grasshopper varied between 28 and 62 individuals captured per minute on Eichhornia floating meadows near these cultivated areas. Our results confirm the high specificity of C. aquaticum to E. crassipes because eggs laid on crop plants are not viable and nymphs A have no possibilities of surviving when fed on these plants. Finally, we recommend carrying out choice tests and field samplings throughout the whole native range of C. aquaticum.

Key words

host-specificity, Leptysminae, semi-aquatic grasshopper, water hyacinth


The semi-aquatic grasshopper Cornops aquaticum Bruner (1906) is of particular interest as a herbivore in the Neotropical wetlands due to the high values of population abundance (Braga et al. 2012, Franceschini et al. 2013), together with high biomass per individual (Gallardo et al. in press) and high consumption rates (Adis & Junk 2003, Braga et al. 2014). This grasshopper is native to South America and inhabits lowlands from Southern Mexico to Central Argentina and Uruguay (Adis et al. 2007).

Several laboratory tests and field observations in native areas have shown the high specificity of C. aquaticum to Pontederiaceae, mainly Eichhornia crassipes. This plant provides the insect with food and an adequate substrate for the endophytic oviposition (Center et al. 2002, Lhano et al. 2005, Silveira Guido & Perkins 1975, Vieira & Santos 2003).

Eichhornia crassipes, commonly known as the water hyacinth, is an aquatic plant originating in the Amazon Basin of Brazil and its distribution native area ranges from tropical to semi-tropical regions of America (Gopal 1987). Outside its native range, it is considered one of the most important weeds of the natural and artificial aquatic systems around the world (Center et al. 2002, Waterhouse & Norris 1987).

According to Cordo (1999), C. aquaticum is considered an intermediate priority category among the candidates for a biological control agent of E. crassipes since the specificity is under testing. A quarantine population of this grasshopper has existed in South Africa for 15 years and it is planned to be released in order to control this weed (Bownes et al. 2010, Oberholzer & Hill 2001).

Although C. aquaticum is considered highly specific to feed on Pontederiaceae, mainly on E. crassipes, some studies in native areas have provided evidence that this grasshopper is oligophagous under field conditions and polyphagousunder laboratory conditions (Ferreira & Vasconcellos-Neto 2001, Capello et al. 2011). Also, adults of C. aquaticum can move from Eichhornia plants to a non-host plant under specific climatic conditions (Ferreira & Vasconcellos-Neto 2001, Franceschini et al. 2011).

Performance and feeding preference of C. aquaticum on crop plants and vegetable species have been scarcely evaluated in native areas, especially under natural conditions (Lhano et al. 2005, Silveira Guido & Perkins 1975).

In non-native areas, Hill and Oberholzer (2000) assessed a quarantine population of C. aquaticum in the ability of first instar nymphs and adult individuals to survive and oviposit in several cultivated and wetland plants under laboratory conditions. Acomplete nymphal development of this grasshopper on Canna indica, Musa paradisiaca and on the South African Pontederiaceae Heteranthera callifolia, was recorded (Oberholzer & Hill 2001).

However, it remains unclear whether the performance of C. aquaticum on crop plants varies in different age categories of these grasshopper populations and the capacity of each category to survive and eventually feed on crop plants in native areas. Considering the occurrence of cultivated areas at subsistence and agro-industrial scale near the wetlands where C. aquaticum and Eichhornia plants are present, it is necessary for a quantitative evaluation of the feeding preference and abundance of individuals in the crops to determine if this grasshopper will choose them as food items. Oberholzerand Hill (2001), in regards to the possibility of releasing C. aquaticum in South Africa, pointed out the necessity of carrying out research to test the feeding behaviour of this grasshopper under more natural conditions in order to clarify the host specificity, including field trials and preference tests with nymphs and adults in native areas.

Thus, the aims of this study were 1) to assess the performance of each age category of C. aquaticum on crop plants and the host plant E. crassipes; 2) to assess the feeding preference of this grasshopper on crop plants in the presence and absence of E. crassipes; and 3) to determine the presence of nymphs and adults of this grasshopper on crops and in the adjacent wetlands where the Eichhornia plants are present.

We hypothesize, first, that this grasshopper has the capacity to survive on crop plants and may choose those as food item during the feeding preference tests. Our second hypothesis is that under field condition, high population abundance and oviposition occur only in E. crassipes.

Material and methods

Crop plants used in this study were Zea mays (maize), Oryza sativa (rice), Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane) and Ilex paraguariensis (mate). These crops were selected due to their high economic importance in agricultural ecosystems of the Neotropic, particularly in the Northeast of Argentina. The patches of these crops and vegetables, which are cultivated at subsistence or agro-industrial scale, frequently alternate with the wetlands due to the good condition of soil nutrients and water availability of these habitats (Benzaquen et al. 2013, Junk 2000, Neiff 2004). The climate in the Northeast of Argentina is subtropical, with warm and long summers and mild winters with a frequency of frost days of 0.25 days/year (Bruniard 1981, 1996). Experiments and field samplings were carried out in summer because, in natural conditions, herbivorous damage on E. crassipes is higher in this season and all age categories of C. aquaticum are present in the grasshopper populations (Franceschini et al. 2013). Duringtheexperiments and field samplings (27th January-07th February; 27-29th March 2007), daily mean temperatures ranged from 19.0-30.1 [degrees]C.

Performance and feeding preference tests were performed in a greenhouse located in the Centro de Ecologia Aplicada del Litoral (27[degrees]28'14" S - 58[degrees]50' 24" W) at 2 km from the wetlands and cultivated habitats, under the influence of the local climate and without direct sun exposure, following the criteria of Vieira and Santos (2003) and Martinez et al. (2013).

Cornops aquaticum individuals were collected using an entomological net (70 cm of diameter and 1 m of depth) in an E. crassipes floating meadow from a lake of the Parana River floodplain. Before the tests, grasshoppers were placed in cages without food and remained starved for four hours to avoid effects of prior experience and learning (Bernays & Chapman 1994).

Performance tests.--In order to evaluate the performance of C. aquaticum on the crop plants and E. crassipes (host plant), survival and oviposition were recorded by means of no-choice tests, with grasshoppers confined onto one plant species at a time. No-choice tests were conducted with four categories of the C. aquaticum population: nymphs A (instars I and II), nymphs B (instars III to VI), adult females and adult males. Cages of 50 x 50 * 50 cm containing 10 individuals from the same age category were set up.

Inside the cages, fresh growing plants of E. crassipes and crops without feeding damage and ovipositions were maintained with water in plastic containers (43 x 30 x 11.5cm). Leaf density of plants within the containers was similar to the leaf density of E. crassipes and crops observed in the field. Damaged plants were replaced by fresh ones every three days in order to maintain food in optimal conditions during the experiments. We performed three replications of each 20 plant-insect age category combinations (5 plant species x 4 insect age categories), with a total of 120 grasshoppers for each plant species (Total N= 600 grasshoppers). The sex ratio for nymphs B was 1:1, but it was not determined for nymphs A. The survival of individuals was assessed every three days for a period of 12 days according to Lhano et al. (2005). At the end of the experiment, plants offered to adult females were carefully dissected and checked to detect the presence of eggs. The females of C. aquaticum were also dissected to confirm the presence of mature ovaries.

Feeding preference tests.--Multiple-choice tests were performed in two distinct forms: the traditional choice test in which all crop species and the host plant were offered together to the grasshoppers and the choice-minus-target test, where all crop species were offered together without the host plant (Sheppard et al. 2005). The choiceminus-target tests allowed us to predict the feeding preference that C. aquaticum should have on crops in the hypothetical situation that the host plant, E. crassipes, became absent in field conditions. For practical reasons, in this paper we use the terms " choice-with-target tests" for those that include E. crassipes in the choice and "choiceminus-target tests" for those without E. crassipes.

Choice tests were conducted with nymphs B, adult females and adult males. These nymphs were selected because last instars of C. aquaticum have higher mobility and higher number of plants in their diet (Capello et al. 2011).

Cages of 50 x 50 x 50 cm containing 10 grasshoppers from the same age category were set up. Leaf rations of E. crassipes and crop plants were placed in a 250 [cm.sup.3] glass with water to maintain leaf turgidity and were distributed equidistant from each other. We performed five replications of each 6 choice test-insect age category combinations (2 choice tests: choice-with-target test and choiceminus-target test x 3 insect age categories: nymphs B, adult males and adult females), with a total of 150 grasshoppers for each choice test (Total N= 300 grasshoppers). The sex ratio for nymphs was 1:1. The leaf rations, instead of the growing plants, allowed us to quantify biomass consumed in each plant species, offering similar amounts of food and visual stimuli to the grasshoppers during the choice tests (Squitier & Capinera 2002). Leaf rations were previously weighed to obtain the initial food fresh weight, and then were offered to the grasshoppers for 24 hours (Squitier & Capinera 2002). We used 24 hours as the period of experiments to avoid the possibility that the grasshoppers chose one species of plant because the alternative more preferred plant was excessively damaged (Mansor & Buckingham 1989).

To calculate the dry weight (dw) of the rations offered at the beginning of the choice tests, 10 similar leaf rations were also prepared as a control; their fresh weight was recorded, and then they were dried at 60 [degrees]C to obtain their constant dry weight and the conversion factor was calculated.

After the feeding period, the remaining leaf rations of each plant were collected and dried at 60 [degrees] C to obtain the constant weight. For each plant species, mg of food consumed by grasshopper per hour was calculated and feeding preference was determined assuming that the most consumed plant was the most preferred.

Presence of C. aquaticum on cultivated patches and wetlands.--Grasshopper sampling was carried out in the Riachuelo River Basin and in the Parana River floodplain. To assess the presence of C. aquaticum on crop plants, field observations were carried out from 9:00 to 13:00 hours in cultivated patches of Z. mays (27[degrees]26'53''S, 58[degrees]51'21"O and 27[degrees]29'20"S, 58[degrees]45'82"0), O. sativa (27[degrees]42'12"S, 58[degrees]46'2"0) and S. officinarum (27[degrees]29'18"S, 58[degrees]46'42"0) that were between 500 to 1000 m to the wetlands with Eichhornia plants. We swept the crop patches and the adjacent Eichhornia floating meadows using an entomological net. In the cultivated patches, sampling was carried out along the edge and center, walking between 30-40 minutes. In the Eichhornia floating meadows, we swept the net for 1 minute from a boat in three different points located at the center and edge of the vegetation. We recorded the number of C. aquaticum individuals captured per minute from the vegetation. We were not able to access the Riachuelo River by boat to sweep the Eichhornia plants associated with O. sativa for security reasons. In this particular case, the presence of C. aquaticum was evaluated indirectly by identifying the feeding damage caused by this grasshopper on the host plant leaves.

Statistical analysis.--To evaluate the performance of C. aquaticum, we compared the final survival of grasshoppers on E. crassipes and the crop plants using a Chi Square Test. Differences on performance and feeding preference between C. aquaticum age categories were assessed using the Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM) with post hoc tests. Differences were considered to be statistically significant at p <0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using Infostat Software (Di Rienzo et al. 2012).


Performance of C. aquaticum on E. crassipes and crops plants.--Performance of C. aquaticum varied between the plant species and the age categories of the grasshopper population. Survival of grasshoppers fed on the E. crassipes and Z. mays was high during all the tests, except for nymphs A fed on Z. mays. The lowest performance of nymphs and adults of C. aquaticum was obtained on O. sativa and I. paraguariensis. Significant differences in survival between age categories of C. aquaticum were found in E. crassipes and crop plants on almost every day of the experiment (Fig. 1).

Results obtained in final survival of C. aquaticum on different plant species show that this grasshopper had the high performance feeding on E. crassipes and on Z. mays, except for nymphs A fed on Z. mays. Final survival of nymphs B and adults fed on Z. mays was not significantly different from the final survival of these grasshopper categories fed on E. crassipes ([X.sup.2] Test, p>0.05 df=3), whereas final survival of nymphs A fed on Z. mays was significantly lower than the final survival of nymphs A fed on E. crassipes ([X.sup.2]Test, p<0.05 df=3). Percentage of final survival of C. aquaticum on E. crassipes varied from 70 to 96.7% and from 3 to 80% on Z. mays (Table 1). Final survival of C. aquaticum fed on O. sativa, S. officinarum and I. paraguariensis was significantly lower than the final survival of this grasshopper fed on E. crassipes ([X.sup.2] Test, p<0.05 df= 3). Percentage of final survival was intermediate in S. officinarum (0-40%) and notably low (0-3.3%) in O. sativa and I. paraguariensis (Table 1).

Analysis and dissection of the plant materials show that ovipositions of C. aquaticum took place in E. crassipes, S. officinarum and Z. mays plants, but only eggs laid on the host plant E. crassipes were endophytic and viable. Eggs of C. aquaticum from E. crassipes were elliptical (20.8 [+ or -] 3 mm long x 4.4 [+ or -] 0.74 mm lat) and had 6 to 24 (12[+ or -] 5.2) eggs. These eggs were covered with a yellowish foamy substance, which acts as a cement, gluing and protecting them. In a cross section, the protein substance around the egg forms a considerably thick layer consisting of thin sheets delimiting numerous air spaces, the structure being similar to the aerenchyma of the petiole of E. crassipes (Fig. 2). Ovipositions on S. officinarum and Z. mays had a smaller number of eggs than those from E. crassipes; the protein substance covering the eggs was also scarce. Eggs were laid on leaves and on the part of the stem that is surrounded by the leaf sheath. These ovipositions were quickly covered by fungi and lost their viability. Ovipositions were not recorded on I. paraguariensis and O. sativa plants. The adult females from E. crassipes and crop plants cages had mature ovaries.

Feeding preference of C. aquaticum on crop plants.--In the choice-with-target test, C. aquaticum nymphs and adults showed high preference to E. crassipes and low preference to the crop plants. Significant differences in consumption between plant species were obtained in adult females, adult males and nymphs B (GLMM, p< 0.05, N= 25). In the choice-with-target test, mean consumption by this grasshopper reached up to 2 mg of food per individual per hour in E. crassipes. Among the crop plant species, Z. mays tended to have highest values of consumption, reaching up to 0.4 mg per individual per hour (Table 2).


In the choice-minus-target test, C. aquaticum presented lower values of consumption in comparison to the consumption observed in the choice-with-target test. Differences in consumption by C. aquaticum between crop plants were obtained only in adult females and nymphs B, which preferred Z. mays and S. officinarum (GLMM, <0.05, N= 20). Consumption by adult males tended to be higher in Z. mays, but differences between crop plants were not significant. Mean consumption of C. aquaticum reached up to 0.54 mg of food per individual per hour in Z. mays. Unlike the choice-with-target test, in the choice-minus-target test adult females of C. aquaticum consumed I. paraguariensis (Table 2).

C. aquaticum on crop patches and Eichhornia floating meadows.--Cornops aquaticum nymphs and adults were not recorded in Z. mays, O. sativa and S. officinarum crop patches. Some terrestrial Acridoidea and Tettigonoidea species were observed in O. sativa and S. officinarum crops, but the plants were scarcely damaged. We recorded high abundance of nymphs and adults of C. aquaticum on the Eichhornia floating meadows associated with Z. mays and S. officinarum, varying in abundance between 28 and 62 individuals captured per minute, respectively. C. aquaticum nymphs represented between 83.32 and 82.25% of the total abundance of grasshoppers on the host plants. In the floating meadows of the Riachuelo River, which was associated with O. sativa crops, leaves of Eichhornia plants were intensely damaged by grasshoppers. Despite the fact that we were unable to access by boat to sweep this floating meadow, the pattern of leaf damage was similar to that produced by C. aquaticum in the Eichhornia floating meadows in the study area. In the irrigation channels of O. sativa, the most common macrophyte was Sagittaria montevidensis, and Eichhornia species were absent during sampling. In the sampled wetlands, coverage of the host plants varied between 40 to 80%.



Survival differences of each age category of the C. aquaticum population obtained on E. crassipes and crop plants show that this aspect should be taken into account in order to evaluate the performance of this grasshopper among plant species.

In the Pantanal of Mato Grosso (Brazil), C. aquaticum nymphs between first and six instars had low final survival when fed on plants cultivated near the wetland habitats, like Lactuca sativa (lettuce) and Brassica oleraceae var acephala (kale) (Lhano et al. 2005).

High survival of C. aquaticum fed on Z. mays indicates that nymphs B and adults have the capacity to survive, to include this crop as a food item and to eventually feed on this crop. However, high mortality of nymphs A and no viable ovipositions indicate that this grasshopper cannot colonize maize successfully. In addition, we did not find this grasshopper in patches of this crop when Eichhornia plants were abundant in the adjacent wetlands. In the same study area, despite the fact that C. aquaticum had high performance and high abundance under field conditions on Oxycarymm cubense (Cyperaceae), this grasshopper did not act as a herbivore of this plant when Eichhornia plants were abundant in the wetlands and only used this cyperaceous as a refuge during cold seasons (Franceschini et al. 2011). High performance of C. aquaticum on the non-host plant Pistia stratiotes was also reported in the Central Amazonia by Vieira and Santos (2003).

In quarantine populations reared in South Africa, performance of first instar nymphs of C. aquaticum was assessed separately in 20 crops and other cultivated plants that grow near the wetland habitats (Oberholzer & Hill 2001). No feeding was recorded on the majority of species tested and most nymphs died during the first week of the experiment. Poor performance of the first instar nymphs on Z. mays, S. officinarum and O. sativa observed in quarantine populations of South Africa (Oberholzer & Hill 2001) is in agreement with our results obtained on nymphs A. Complete development of nymphs on Musa paradisiaca (banana) and Canna indica (canna) and the Pontederiaceae Heteranthera callifolia reported by these authors suggests that more studies of feeding preference and performance of different age categories of C. aquaticum are necessary in native and non-native areas.

Shoot and leaf anatomy of the crop plants are not compatible to endophytic oviposition and survival of nymphs A of C. aquaticum (Boeger & Adis 2007) and chemical factors also could play an important role (Bernays & Champan 1994, Hinks & Olfert 1999). No viable oviposition on the crop plant and endophytic oviposition only on E. crassipes indicate that C. aquaticum cannot colonize these crop plants and this is in agreement with results obtained in native areas that confirm the specificity of this grasshopper to oviposit in the host plants (Ferreira & Vasconcellos-Neto 2001, Franceschini et al. 2011, Silveira Guido & Perkins 1975). Low performance and high mortality of nymphs A obtained from the crop plants in our study support this statement. Smaller oviposition and a low number of eggs of C. aquaticum found on S. officinarum and Z. mays plants agree with the findings of Awmack and Leather (2002) who pointed out that females of herbivorous insects tend to have a reduced number of eggs and poorer yolk content in plants with low nutritional quality. Eggs of C. aquaticum laid on S. officinarum and Z. mays could also lose their viability because the microclimate conditions are not stable outside the plant tissue for development and eggs are more susceptible to fungi or predators (Braker 1989, 1991).

Choice test with E. crassipes showed that C. aquaticum nymphs B and adults had a high feeding preference for this plant. This agrees with almost all results obtained under field and laboratory conditions (Capello et al. 2011, Ferreira & Vasconcellos Neto 2001, Silveira Guido & Perkins 1975). However, Ferreira and Vasconcellos Neto (2001) pointed out that adult females of C. aquaticum in the Mato Grosso wetlands may prefer another wetland plant during the dry season instead of Eichhornia plants under field condition.

Cornops aquaticum showed a low feeding preference of O. sativa and S. officinarum in the choice-with-target test and this is in agreement with the results obtained by Silveira Guido and Perkins (1975). The mixture of different plant species in the diet of polyphagous grasshoppers improves the nutrient balance of these insects ( Bernays & Chapman 1994, Bernays & Minkenberg 1997). In this sense, the low amount of crop plants consumed by C. aquaticum in the choice test that included E. crassipes would provide the extra nutrients to achieve the balance necessary to the grasshopper's physiology. The fact that non-host plants are found in the feces and gut contents of C. aquaticum nymphs and adults collected from the field agrees with this statement (Capello et al. 2011, Ferreira & Vasconcellos Neto 2001).

High preference of C. aquaticum to Z. mays and S. officinarum in the choice-minus-target test indicates that this grasshopper is able to feed and choose these crop plants as food item when the host plant E. crassipes is absent. High to intermediate performance of C. aquaticum to survive on both crop plants support these results and show the importance to carry out performance and preference tests simultaneously when feeding behaviour is an aspect to be studied. Because Z. mays and S. officinarum are plants with C4 photosynthetic pathway, results obtained in the non-choice test and choice-minus-target test did not agree with those found by several authors (Caswell et al. 1973, Hinks & Olfert 1999, Scheirs et al. 2001). The herbivorous insects tend to avoid [C.sub.4] plants, because Kranz leaf anatomy concentrates proteins and carbohydrates in difficult-to-digest bundle sheath cells (Caswell et al. 1973, Scheirs et al. 2001). Adis and Victoria (2001) reported [C.sub.3] photosynthetic pathway to E. crassipes. No C. aquaticum individuals were recorded in the crop patches adjacent to E. crassipes wetlands. This is in agreement with the observations made by Silveira Guido and Perkins (1975). Despite that, we did not find Eichhornia plants in the irrigation channels and cultivated areas of O. sativa; Maltchik et al. (2011) mentioned that this environment provides suitable habitats and ecological conditions for many freshwater insects and Pontederiaceae plants, including E. crassipes.

We did not include sampling in cultivated patches of I. paraguariensis, but analysis of Orthoptera material collected in an agro-industrial cultivation indicates that C. aquaticum individuals were not present under field conditions in this crop (Franceschini & De Wysiecki unpubl.). This would confirm the negligible performance and feeding preference obtained in the no-choice and choice tests. Considering that nymphs A cannot survive on the crop plants studied, our previous hypothesis that C. aquaticum has the capacity to survive on crop plants and may choose them as food items during the feeding preference tests must be partially accepted. We accept our second hypothesis that under field conditions high population abundance and eggs laid of C. aquaticum occur only on the host plants E. crassipes.

Finally, we recommend continuing with the feeding behaviour studies through the native distribution area of C. aquaticum, especially near the wetlands habitats where coverage of the host plants decrease by prolonged dry seasons or anthropic effect. In non-native areas where specific predators of C. aquaticum are absent, studies on genetics, feeding preference and prey-predator interactions would contribute substantially to predict the success of this grasshopper as a biological control agent of E. crassipes.


This research is dedicated to the late loachim LJ. Adis, who was involved in coordinating the Cornops studies in South America. This work was funded by the HICWA (Host-insect coevolution on water hyacinth) Project of the Tropical Ecology Group of the Max-Planck Limnology Institute (Plon, Germany), PICT 12755 and PICT 20112160 of the FONCYT (Argentina). We thank Ing. Manuel Vasallo, Ing. Alfredo Marin (1NTA El Sombrero, Corrientes), Ing. Victor J. Navajas and Ing. Matias Bellomo (Establecimiento Las Marias, Virasoro, Corrientes) for providing the crop plants used in the tests and technical assistance in the field. We thank the anonymous reviewers and the Editor who improved the manuscript.


Adis J., Junk W. 2003. Feeding impact and bionomics of grasshopper Cornops aquaticum on the water hyacinth Eichhornia crassipes in the Central Amazonian floodplains. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 38: 245-249.

Adis J., Victoria R.L. 2001. C3 or C4 macrophytes: a specific carbon source for the development of semi-aquatic and terrestrial arthropods in Central Amazonian river floodplains according to 513 C values. Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies 37: 193-198.

Adis J., Bustorf E., Lhano M., Amedegnato C, Nunes A.L. 2007. Distribution of Cornops grasshoppers (Leptysminae: Acrididae: Orthoptera) in Latin America and the Caribbean Islands. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 42: 11-24.

Awmack C.S., Leather S.R. 2002. Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insect. Annual Review of Entomology 47: 817-844.

Benzaquen L., Blanco D.E., Bo R.F., Kandus P., Lingua G.F., Minotti P., Quintana R.D., Sverlij S., Vidal L. 2013. Inventario de los humedales de Argentina: sistemas de paisajes de humedales del corredor fluvial Parana Paraguay. Secretaria de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable de la Nacion, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Bernays E.A., Chapman B. 1994. Host-plant selections by phytophagous insect. Chapman & Hall, New York, USA.

Bernays E.A., Minkenberg O.P.J.M. 1997. Insea herbivores: different reason for being a generalist. Ecology 78: 1157-1169.

Boeger R., Adis J. 2007. Anatomia de cinco especies de macrofitas aquaticas e sua importancia para Cornops aquaticum (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Leptysminae). Amazoniana 19: 199-208.

Bownes A., Hill M.P., Byrne M.J. 2010. Evaluating the impact of herbivory by a grasshopper, Cornops aquaticum (Orthoptera: Acrididae), on the competitive performance and biomass accumulation of water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes (Pontederiaceae). Biological Control 53:297-303.

Braga C.E., Nunes A.L., Morais J.W., Adis J. 2012. Fenologia de Cornops aquaticum (Bruner 1906) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) associado a Eichhomia crassipes (Mart.) Solms (Pontederiaceae) em um lago de Varzea na Amazonia Central, Brasil. Revista de la Sociedad Entomologica Argentina 70: 185-196.

Braga C.E., Nunes A.L., Morais J.W., Adis J. 2014. Avaliacao do potencial do gafanhoto Cornops aquaticum (Orthoptera) como agente de controle biologico de Eichhomia crassipes (Pontederiaceae). Interciencia 38: 590-596.

Braker H.E. 1989. Evolution and ecology of oviposition on host plants by acridoid grasshoppers. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 38: 389-406.

Braker H. E. 1991. Natural history of a Neotropicalgap-in habiting grasshopper. Biotropica 23: 41-51.

Bruniard E.D. 1981. El clima de las planicies del Norte Argentino. Vol. I and II. Editorial de la Facultad de Humanidades de la Universidad Nacional del Nordeste, Resistencia, Argentina.

Bruniard E.D. 1996. Geografia de los climas y de las formaciones vegetales. Las zonas termicas y la vegetacion natural. Editorial Universitaria de la Universidad Nacional del Nordeste, Corrientes, Argentina.

Capello S., De Wysiecki M.L., Marchese M. 2011. Feeding patterns of the Aquatic Grasshopper Cornops aquaticum (Biuner) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in the Middle Parana River, Argentina. Neotropical Entomology 40: 170-175.

Caswell H., Reed F., Stephenson S.N., Werner P.A. 1973. Photosynthetic pathways and selective herbivory: a hypothesis. The American Naturalist 107: 465-480.

Center T.D., Hill M.P., Cordo H., Julien M.H. 2002. Waterhyacinth. In: van Driesche R., Blossey B., Hoddle M., Lyon S., Reardon R. (Eds.). Biological control of invasive plants in the eastern United States. Forest Health and Technology Enterprises Team, Morgantown.

Cordo H.A. 1999. New agents for biological control of water hyacinth. In: Hill M.P., Julien M.H., Center T. (Eds). Proceeding of the first IOBC global working group meeting for the biological and integrated control of water hyacinth. Pretoria, South Africa.

Di Rienzo J.A., Casanoves E, Balzarini M.G., Gonzalez L., Tablada M., Robledo C.W. 2012. InfoStat version 2012. Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Cordoba, Argentina. URL

Ferreira S.A., Vasconcellos Neto J. 2001. Ecology, behavior and bionomics of Cornops aquaticum in Pocone, Brazil. Neotropical Entomology 30: 523-533.

Franceschini M.C., Neiff J.J. & Amedegnato C. 2011 .The Oxycaryum cubense floating mat as refuge of Cornops aquaticum (Orthoptera: Acrididae), a new control agent of the water hyacinth. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 46: 203-210.

Franceschini M.C., Poi A., De Wysiecki M.L. 2013. Age Structure and Feeding of the Neotropical Grasshopper Cornops aquaticum (Bruner) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) on Water Hyacinth. Neotropical Entomology 42: 344-350.

Gallardo L., Franceschini M.C., Poi A. & De Wysiecki M.L. Estimaciones de la biomasa de Cornops aquaticum Bruner (Orthoptera: Acrididae) en Eichhomia (Pontederiaceae) en el nordeste de Argentina. Revista de Biologia Tropical (in press).

Gopal B., 1987. Aquatic Plant Studies 1 : Water Hyacinth. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Hill M.P., Oberholzer I.G. 2000. Host specificity of the grasshopper, Cornops aquaticum a natural enemy of water hyacinth. In: Spencer N.R. (Ed.). Proceedings of the Xth International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds 4-14 July 1999. Montana State University, Bozeman, U.S.A.

Hinks C.F., O. Olfert. 1999. Growth and survival of early-instar grasshopper on selected perennial grasses, with observations on plant constituents which may influence performance. Journal of Orthoptera Research 8: 237-242.

Junk W. 2000. Neotropical floodplains: a continental wide view. In: Junk W., Ohly J.J., Piedade M.T.F., Soares M.G.M. (Eds.). The Central Amazon Floodplain: Actual use and options for a sustainable management. BacJthuys Publisher, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Lhano M.G., Adis J., Marques M.I., Batirola L.D. 2005. Cornops aquaticum (Orthoptera, Acrididae, Leptysminae) aceitacao de plantas alimentares por ninfas vivendo em Eichhomia azurea (Pontederiaceae) no Pantanal norte, Brasil. Amazoniana 18: 397-404.

Maltchik L., Rolon A.S., Stenert C., Machado I.F., Rocha 0.2011. Can rice field channels contribute to biodiversity conservation in Southern Brazilian wetlands? Revista de Biologia Tropical 59: 1895-1914

Mansor M., Buckingham G.R. 1989. Laboratory host range studies with a leaf mining duckweed shore fly. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 27: 115-118.

Martinez S.F., Franceschini M.C., Poi A. 2013. Preferencia alimentaria de Neochetina eichhomiae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) en plantas acuaticas de diferente valor nutritivo. Revista Colombiana de Entomologia: 39:81-87.

Neiff J.J. 2004. El Ibera ... ?en peligro?. Editorial de la Fundacion Vida Silvestre. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Oberholzer I. G., Hill M. P. 2001. How safe is the grasshopper Comops aquaticum for release on water hyacinth in South Africa? In: Julien M.H., Hill M.P., Center T.D., Jianqing D. (Eds.). Biological and integrated control of water hyacinth, Eichhomia crassipes. ACIAR Proceedings 102: 82-88.

Scheirs J., De Bruyn L., Verhagen R. 2001. A test of the C3-C4 hypothesis with two grass miners. Ecology 82: 410-421.

Sheppard A.W., van Klinken R.D., Heard T. 2005. Scientific advances in the analysis of the risks of weed biological control agents to non-target plants. Biological Control 35: 215-226.

Silveira Guido A., Perkins B.D. 1975. Biological and host specificity of Cornops aquaticum (Bruner) (Orthoptera: Acrididae), a potential biological control agent for water hyacinth. Environmental Entomology 4:400-404

Squitier J.M., Capinera J. 2002. I lost selection by grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) inhabiting semi-aquatic environment. Florida Entomologist 85: 336-340.

Vieira M.F., Santos A.C. 2003. Duracao do ciclo de vida de Cornops aquaticum (Bruner, 1906) (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Leptysminae) e aspectos de seu comportamento alimentar na Amazonia central. Acta Amazonica 33: 711-714.

Waterhouse D.F., Norris K.R. 1987. Eichhomia crassipes (Martius) SolmsLaubach. In: Waterhouse D.F, Norris K.R. (Eds.). Biological Control Pacific Prospect. Inkata Press, Melbourne, Australia: 332-341 p.

Celeste Franceschini, F. Solange Martinez and M. Laura De Wysiecki

(CF, FSM) CECOAL-CONICET-UNNE, Centro de Ecologia Aplicada del Litoral, Ruta 5, km 2.5, (3400) Corrientes, Argentina, Email:;

(CF) Catedra de Limnologia, FACENA, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste, Corrientes, Argentina (MLDW) Centro de Estudios Parasitologicos y de Vectores (UNLP- CCT La Plata- CONICET), Boulevard 120 entre 60 y 64, 1900 La Plata, Argentina. Email:

(MLDW) Catedra de Ecologia de Pastizales y Sistemas Agricolas, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
Table 1. Performance of Cornops aquaticum adults and nymphs comparing
values of final survival on the host plant Eichhornia crassipes
(reference values) with those from the crop plants with the
Chi-square test ([X.sup.2]). Performance is expressed as the mean
number of grasshoppers surviving at 12 days and ([+ or -]) indicate
standard deviation. (%) indicate percentage of final survival at 12
days of the experiments. (*) in the [X.sup.2] values indicate
significant differences (p<0.05, df=3).

                    Eichhornia              Oryza
                    crassipes               sativa

Adult females                         0.33 [+ or -] 0.58
                9.67 [+ or -] 0.58           3.3%
                      96.7%          [X.sup.2]=27.10 *

Adult males                           0.33 [+ or -] 0.58
                9.33 [+ or -] 0.58           3.3%
                      93.3%          [X.sup.2]=26.11 *

Nymphs B                              0.00 [+ or -] 0.00
                7.00 [+ or -] 1.73            0%
                       70%            [X.sup.2]=21 *

Nymphs A                              0.00 [+ or -] 0.00
                9.33 [+ or -] 1.15            0%
                      93.3%           [X.sup.2]=28 *

                     Saccharum                 Zea
                    officinarum                mays

Adult females    3.67 [+ or -] 1.53     7.33 [+ or -] 2.08
                       36.7%                  73.3%
                [X.sup.2]=11.54 *    [X.sup.2]=2.71

Adult males      4.00 [+ or -] 1.00     8.00 [+ or -] 2.00
                        40%                    80%
                [X.sup.2]=9.37 *     [X.sup.2]=1.51

Nymphs B         2.00 [+ or -] 1.00     7.00 [+ or -] 1.73
                        20%                    70%
                [X.sup.2]=11.11 *       [X.sup]=2.50

Nymphs A         0.00 [+ or -] 0.00     0.33 [+ or -] 0.58
                         0%                    3.3%
                 [X.sup.2]=28 *     [X.sup]=26.13 *


Adult females   0.00 [+ or -] 0.00
                [X.sup]=29 *

Adult males     0.00 [+ or -] 0.00
                [X.sup]=28 *

Nymphs B        0.00 [+ or -] 0.00
                [X.sup]=21 *

Nymphs A        0.00 [+ or -] 0.00
                [X.sup]=28 *

Table 2. Feeding preference of Cornops aquaticum adults and nymphs B
on crop plants, showing the consumption of grasshoppers during the
choice-with-target test and choice-minus-target tests. Consumption of
grasshoppers is expressed as mg of plant consumed per individual per
hour. (+ or -]) is standard deviation and (*) in the p values indicate
significant differences on consumption between plant species with the
Generalized Linear Mixed Models (p< 0.05). Different letters indicate
significant differences on consumption between plant species with the
Post hoc test.

Choice-with-target test

          Zea                      Oryza
          mays                     sativa

Adult     0.30 (b)                 0.05 (b)
females   [+ or -] 0.16            [+ or -] 0.06

Adult     0.40 (b)                 0.17 (b)
males     [+ or -] 0.37            [+ or -] 0.33

Nymphs B  0.31 (b) [+ or -] 0.24   0.25 (b) [+ or -] 0.24

          Saccharum                Ilex
          officinarum              paraguariensis

Adult     0.10 (b)                 0.001 (b)
females   [+ or -] 0.23            [+ or -] 0.00

Adult     0.05 (b)                 0.06 (b)
males     [+ or -] 0.09            [+ or -] 0.07

Nymphs B  0.17 (b) [+ or -] 0.26   0.15 (b) [+ or -] 0.10

          crassipes                p values

Adult     2.00 (a)                 <0.0001 *
females   [+ or -] 0.81

Adult     1.25 (a)                 <0.0001 *
males     [+ or -] 0.34

Nymphs B  1.28 (a) [+ or -] 0.26   <0.0001 *

Choice-minus-target test

          Zea                      Oryza
          mays                     sativa

Adult     0.54 (a)                 0.14 (b)
females   [+ or -] 0.37            [+ or -] 0.16

Adult     0.40 (a)                 0.04 (a)
males     [+ or -] 0.41            [+ or -] 0.07

Nymphs B  0.42 (a) [+ or -] 0.34   0.05 (b) [+ or -] 0.06

          Saccharum                Ilex                     p values
          officinarum              paraguariensis

Adult     0.38 (a)                 0.10b                    0.047 *
females   [+ or -] 0.31            [+ or -] 0.05

Adult     0.18 (a)                 0.07 (a)                 0.263
males     [+ or -] 0.33            [+ or -] 0.09

Nymphs B  0.45 (a) [+ or -] 0.27   0.07 (b) [+ or -] 0.03   0.009 *
COPYRIGHT 2014 The Orthopterists' Society
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2014 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Franceschini, Celeste; Martinez, F. Solange; De Wysiecki, M. Laura
Publication:Journal of Orthoptera Research
Date:Jul 1, 2014
Previous Article:A new species of Mongolotmethis from the Gobi region of Mongolia (Orthoptera: Pamphagidae).
Next Article:Letter from the Editor.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters