Penile fracture with bilateral corporeal rupture and complete urethral disruption: case report and literature review.
We report the case of a 35-year-old male who presented to the emergency department 1 hour following blunt injury of the penis during sexual intercourse. The patient reported a "tearing/popping" sensation, rapid detumescence, severe penile pain and frank blood per urethra. The patient was unable to void following the injury.
Physical examination demonstrated a tender and swollen penis with hematoma extending over the proximal penile shaft, scrotum and perineum. This examination suggested extension beyond Buck's fascia, but the hematoma appeared contained within Colles' fascia. Blood was visible at the urethral meatus (Fig 1). "Rolling sign" was present bilaterally, palpated at the sites of tunical disruption about 3 cm from the base of the penis and was tender on examination. The scrotum was swollen and painful to palpation, but the testicles felt structurally normal. Abdominal examination was unremarkable, though the bladder was palpable.
The patient was healthy with no medications or allergies. There was no known previous urologic history.
The patient was taken to the operating room for urgent exploration of suspected penile fracture with associated urethral injury. An intraoperative retrograde urethrogram (RUG) was performed that demonstrated urethral disruption at the level of the penoscrotal junction (Fig. 2). A suprapubic tube using a 12-French Foley catheter was placed.
A subcoronal circumferential incision was made and the penis degloved. Obvious disruption of Buck's fascia was evident; upon exploration, bilateral, 1-cm transverse ruptures of the corpora cavernosa were discovered on the proximal penile shaft (Fig. 3). The defects were repaired with 3-0 vicryl sutures in a simple running fashion. Exploration of the corpus spongiosum revealed complete disruption of the urethra (Fig. 4). This was repaired over an 18-French council tip catheter with 4-0 PDS suture with a simple interrupted end-to-end primary reanastomosis in a tension-free fashion (Fig. 5).
The patient recovered well in hospital and was discharged on postoperative day 2 on antibiotics with a Foley catheter to straight drainage and suprapubic catheter capped. The patient was advised to abstain from intercourse for at least 4 weeks. The patient underwent a RUG on postoperative day 15, which demonstrated mucosal irregularity at the bulbar/penile urethral junction with no contrast extravasation (Fig. 6). The urethral catheter was therefore removed, with the capped suprapubic catheter removed on postoperative day 28. Upon follow-up on day 28, the patient reported normal voiding and satisfactory painless erections.
Penile fracture, in which there is disruption of the tunica albuginea and rupture of the corpora cavernosum, is uncommon. In North America, it is most commonly associated with sexual intercourse and occurs when the rigid penis slips from the vagina striking the partner's perineum or pubic bone.[sup.1] In Middle East countries, a common cause of penile fracture is self-inflicted injury.[sup.2] This is a practice termed taghaandan and occurs when the erect penis is bent or struck to achieve rapid detumescence.[sup.1]-[sup.3]
The tunica albuginea is a structure of great tensile strength that is able to withstand rupture at pressures up to 1500 mmHg. The tunica albuginea thins markedly during erection, which when combined with abnormal bending leads to excessive intracavernosal pressure and most often a transverse laceration of the proximal shaft.[sup.1,4]
It has been suggested that traumatic penile rupture may be associated with histologic changes in the tunica albuginea rendering it more prone to fracture.[sup.5] Evidence of fibrosclerosis and cellular infiltrates have been documented on pathologic review of ruptured tunica albuginea.[sup.5] This is thought to be due to previous trauma which could predispose to rupture at lower pressures than with healthy tunica.[sup.5]
While intercourse and self-manipulation account for most cases of penile fracture, there have been reports of fracture following a fall from bed with an erect penis, rolling over in bed during nocturnal tumescence, attempting to correct congenital chordee, disentangling an erect penis from a garment, hitting an erect penis against a toilet seat, following forceful contact with the dashboard of a stopping car and masturbating into a cocktail shaker.[sup.2,6]-[sup.11]
Often, the laceration is unilateral though bilateral rupture accounts for 2% to 10% of cases.[sup.12]-[sup.15] Associated urethral injury is rare, with reported frequencies in the 9% to 20% range.[sup.15]-[sup.18] Patients with bilateral corporeal rupture should be assumed to have urethral injury, as previous reports have documented this association.[sup.19]-[sup.21]
The diagnosis of penile fracture is typically made clinically.[sup.1] Classic features include the patient reporting an audible "popping" sound, rapid detumescence, pain, penile swelling and deviation of the penis often to the side opposite the injury secondary to mass effect of the hematoma at the injury site.[sup.1] Following injury, if Buck's fascia remains intact, the hematoma develops resulting in the characteristic "eggplant deformity."[sup.1,22,23]
The defect at the fracture site is often palpable and has been described as the "rolling sign." This represents a firm, mobile, tender mass, where the penile skin can be rolled over the blood clot.[sup.24]
History and physical examination are sufficient to make the diagnosis in most penile fracture cases. Therefore, additional diagnostic imaging modalities, such as cavernosography and sonography, are often unnecessary and are often best reserved for cases where the diagnosis is unclear or the history is not typical. Retrograde urethrography is a valuable tool to evaluate urethral injuries.[sup.15,21,23] Magnetic resonance imaging has been advocated, and though this modality can be useful in assessing penile fracture, availability and cost have limited its use.[sup.15,25,26]
False penile fracture has been described in the setting of penile trauma with swelling and ecchymosis, though the classic "pop" sound and rapid detumescence are absent.[sup.27] The most common mimic of penile fracture is vascular injury to the dorsal penile artery and vein and is an instance where cavernosography may be useful.[sup.28,29] When discovered intra-operatively, the injured dorsal penile vein may be managed with ligation.[sup.30]
Studies comparing surgical versus conservative treatment favour immediate surgical exploration and reconstruction. Conservative treatments have included compression bandages, ice packs, fibrinolytics, anti-inflammatories, sedatives and anti-androgens.[sup.8,31]-[sup.32] Immediate intervention has been associated with shorter duration of hospital stay, higher levels of patient satisfaction, and improved outcomes including reduced incidence of erectile dysfunction.[sup.15,17,18,33]-[sup.35]
Ibrahiem and colleagues recently published a series of 155 cases where normal erectile function in the absence of curvature or scarring was observed in 77% of patients.[sup.15]
A subcoronal or circumferential is the best described surgical approach, allowing good visualization of all 3 corporeal compartments and allowing for exploration and repair of any concomitant urethral injury.[sup.9,34] Other approaches described include penoscrotal, inguinoscrotal, lateral and suprapubic incisions.[sup.36,37]
Penile fracture remains a rare, yet likely underreported condition. Diagnosis is usually clinical and urgent surgical exploration and repair should be undertaken to improve outcomes. Urethral injury should be suspected in penile fracture, especially in those cases with bilateral cavernosal rupture or suggestive clinical features.
Competing interests: None declared.
This paper has been peer-reviewed.
1.. Morey AF, Rozanski TA. Genital and lower urinary tract trauma.WeinAJKavoussiLRNovickAC, et al. Campbell-Walsh Urology;39th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2007ch. 83.
2.. Zargooshi J. Penile fracture in Kermanshah, Iran: report of 172 cases. J Urol 2000;164:364-6.
3.. Zargooshi J. Penile fracture in Kermanshah, Iran: the long-term results of surgical treatment. BJU Int 2002;89:890-4.
4.. Bitsch M, Kromann-Andersen B, Schou J, et al. The elasticity and the tensile strength of the tunica albuginea of the corpora cavernosa. J Urol 1990;143:642-5.
5.. De Rose AF, Giglio M, Carmignani G. Traumatic rupture of the corpora cavernosa: new physiopathologic acquisitions. Urol 2001;57:319-22.
6.. Ozen HA, Erkan I, Alkibay T, et al. Fracture of the penis and long-term results of surgical treatment. Br J Urol 1986;58:551-2.
7.. Kalash SS, Young JD Jr. Fracture of penis: controversy of surgical versus conservative treatment. Urol 1984;24:21-4.
8.. Klein FA, Smith MJ, Miller N. Penile fracture: diagnosis and management. J Trauma 1985;25:1090-2.
9.. El-Taher AM, Aboul-Ella HA, Sayed MA, et al. Management of penile fracture. J Trauma 2004;56:1138-40.
10.. Fetter TR, Gartman E. Traumatic rupture of penis. Case report. Am J Surg 1936;32:371-2.
11.. Eke N. Fracture of the penis. Br J Surg 2002;89:555-65.
12.. Koifman L, Cavalcanti AG, Manes CH, et al. Penile fracture-Experience in 56 cases. Int Braz J Urol 2003;29:35-9.
13.. Mydlo JH. Surgeon experience with penile fracture. J Urol 2001;166:526-8.
14.. Al-Shaiji TF, Amann J, Brock GB. Fractured penis: diagnosis and management. J Sex Med 2009;6:3231-40.
15.. Ibrahiem EI, El-Tholoth HS, Mohsen T, et al. Penile fracture: long-term outcome of immediate surgical intervention. Urol 2010;75:108-11.
16.. Tsang T, Demby AM. Penile fracture with urethral injury. J Urol 1992;147:466-8.
17.. Orvis BR, McAninch JW. Penile rupture. Urol Clin North Am 1989;16:369-75.
18.. Nicolaisen GS, Melamud A, Williams RD, et al. Rupture of the corpus cavernosum: surgical management. J Urol 1983;130:917-9.
19.. Kowalczyk J, Athens A, Grimaldi A. Penile fracture: an unusual presentation with lacerations of bilateral corpora cavernosa and partial disruption of the urethra. Urol 1994;44:599-601.
20.. Cumming J, Jenkins J. Fracture of the corpora cavernosa and urethral rupture during sexual intercourse. Br J Urol 1991;67:327.
21.. Fergany AF, Angermeier KW, Montague DK. Review of Cleveland Clinic experience with penile fracture. Urol 1999;54:352-5.
22.. Tan LB, Chiang C, Huang C, et al. Traumatic rupture of the corpus cavernosum. Br J Urol 1991;68:626-8.
23.. Mydlo JH, Hayyeri M, Macc RJ. Urethrography and cavernosography imaging in a small series of penile fractures: a comparison with surgical findings. Urol 1998;51:616-9.
24.. Naraynsingh V, Raju GC. Fracture of the penis. Br J Surg 1985;72:305-6.
25.. Rahmouni A, Hoznek A, Duron A, et al. Magnetic resonance in penile rupture: aid to diagnosis. J Urol 1995;153:1927-8.
26.. Maubon AJ, Roux JO, Faix A, et al. Case report penile fracture: MRI demonstration of a urethral tear associated with a rupture of the corpus cavernosum. Eur Radiol 1998;8:469-70.
27.. Shah DK, Paul EM, Meyersfield SA, et al. False fracture of the penis. Urol 2003;61:1259.
28.. Armenekas NA, Hochberg DA, Fracchia JA. Traumatic avulsion of the penis mimicking a penile fracture. J Urol200;166:619.
29.. Nicely ER, Costabile RA, Moul JW. Rupture of the deep dorsal vein of the penis during sexual intercourse. J Urol 1992;147:150-2.
30.. Nehru-Babu M, Hendry D, Al-Saffar N. Rupture of the dorsal vein mimicking fracture of the penis. BJU Int 1999;84:179-80.
31.. Farah RN, Stiles R Jr, Cerny JC. Surgical treatment of deformity and coital difficulty in healed traumatic rupture of the corpus cavernosa. J Urol 1978;120:118-20.
32.. Abulata KA, Awad RA. Fracture shaft of penis. Non-surgical treatment of three cases. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1983;28:266-8.
33.. Masarani M, Dinneen M. Penile fracture: diagnosis and management. Trends Urol Gynaecol Sex Health 2007;12:20-4.
34.. Asgari MA, Hosseini SY, Safarinejad MR, et al. Penile fractures: evaluation, therapeutic approaches and long-term results. J Urol 1996;155:148-9.
35.. Mansi MK, Emran M, el-Mahrouky A, et al. Experience with penile fractures in Egypt: long-term results of immediate surgical repair. J Trauma 1993;35:67-70.
36.. Kamdar C, Mooppan UM, Kim H, et al. Penile fracture: preoperative evaluation and surgical technique for optimal patient outcome. BJU Int 2008;102:1640-4.
37.. Konnak JW, Ohl DA. Microsurgical penile revascularization using the central corporeal penile artery. J Urol 1989;142:305-8.
Fig. 1.: Penile fracture with blood at meatus and developing hematoma. [Figure omitted]
Fig. 2.: An intraoperative retrograde urethrogram was performed that demonstrated urethral disruption at the level of the penoscrotal junction. [Figure omitted]
Fig. 3.: Intraoperative photo demonstrating bilateral transverse rupture of the corpora cavernosa. [Figure omitted]
Fig. 4.: Intraoperative photo showing complete urethral disruption. [Figure omitted]
Fig. 5.: Photo showing primary reanastomosis of urethra. [Figure omitted]
Fig. 6.: Postoperative day 15: retrograde urethrogram demonstrating intact urethra. [Figure omitted]
 Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Gordon & Leslie Diamond Health Care Centre, Vancouver, BC
Correspondence: Dr. Nathan A. Hoag, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Gordon & Leslie Diamond Health Care Centre, Level 6, 2775 Laurel St., Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9; firstname.lastname@example.org
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Case Report|
|Author:||Hoag, Nathan A.; Hennessey, Kiara; So, Alan|
|Publication:||Canadian Urological Association Journal (CUAJ)|
|Article Type:||Case study|
|Date:||Apr 1, 2011|
|Previous Article:||Nephrectomy in patients with Caroli's and ADPKD may be associated with increased morbidity.|
|Next Article:||Subclavian vein thrombosis: an unusual presentation of renal cell carcinoma.|