Printer Friendly

Pelland v. Rhode Island.

U.S. District Court

PROBATION-CONDITIONS

Pelland v. Rhode Island, 317 F.Supp.2d 86 (D.R.I. 2004). A sex offender probationer challenged Rhode Island's enforcement of a policy that curtailed the right of sex offender probationers to travel interstate. The district court entered judgment for the state, finding that the probationer had no right to travel interstate, and the policy did not violate equal protection nor result in an Ex Post Facto violation. The court noted that the policy did not proscribe interstate travel altogether, but merely imposed various conditions that the Department of Corrections had deemed useful for monitoring the movement of sex offenders who were on probation (Rhode Island Department of Corrections)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:law enforcement policy curtails right of sex offenders' interstate travel
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U1RI
Date:Aug 1, 2004
Words:115
Previous Article:Cline v. Fox.
Next Article:Royal v. Durison.
Topics:


Related Articles
U.S. Appeals Court: EX POST FACTO SEX OFFENDER.
U.S. District Court: TRANSFERS PRIVACY.
U.S. District Court: SEX OFFENDER.
U.S. District Court: SEX OFFENDER.
U.S. appeals court sex offenders. (Ex-Offenders).
U.S. appeals court sex offenders ex post facto. (Release).
U.S. appeals court sex offenders ex post facto. (Sentence).
Ex-offenders.
Hatton v. Bonner.
Doe v. Moore.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters