Printer Friendly

Peines para el despiojamiento en las antiguas poblaciones de arica: rascando la evidencia.

HEAD COMBS FOR DELOUSING IN ANCIENT ARICAN POPULATIONS: SCRATCHING FOR THE EVIDENCE

Infestation with the head louse, Pediculus humanus capitis, occurs worldwide and can be considered the most common parasitic infestation of children (Pilger et al. 2010). Pediculosis is associated with considerable morbidity. Whereas many patients remain asymptomatic, the condition can be extremely annoying for affected individuals. The most common symptom is severe pruritus (itching), caused by repeated blood-feeding by the parasites (Luniga and Caro 2010). Affected individuals are continuously scratching their heads, and have the potential for developing secondary bacterial infections of the scalp.

Pediculosis has accompanied humankind since ancient times in both the Old and New World, and affected communities probably applied various measures to reduce the pest burden and associated symptoms (Mumcuoglu 2008; Mumcuoglu and Zias 1988). In the Old World hair combs have been found in the Middle East (Levant) as early as the Natufian Period (13,950-11,950 BP) (Mumcuoglu and Zias 1989). Head lice combs are also known from ancient Egypt with one dated to about 1,450 to 1,550 BP (Mumcuoglu 2008; Palma 1991). Also 24 hair combs from Israel, Judean and Negev Deserts, dated between approximately 2,050-1,150 BP were reported in the literature (Mumcuoglu 2008; Mumcuoglu and Zias 1988). Most Old World combs were two-sided and made of wood; some were made from bone and ivory (Mumcuoglu 2008; Mumcuoglu and Zias 1988). In contrast, for the Americas, no in-depth studies of lice combs were found, only general information that these artifacts were associated with late agropastoral or fisher-gatherer populations (Dauelsberg 1972; Hidalgo and Focacci 1986). In contrast, the presence of Pediculus humanus capitis has been observed in the hair of South American mummies beginning as early as 10,000 BP (Araujo et al. 2000). Andean mummies show high prevalence of infestations of pediculosis (Arriaza et al. 2012, 2013; Reinhard and Buikstra 2003; Rivera et al. 2008). Pediculosis was endemic in Arica, northern Chile, affecting 4 out of 5 individuals (Arriaza 2013). Archaeological combs have been found as grave goods in ancient burials along coastal and inland sites in northern Chile. The purpose of these combs has not been resolved and is the subject of this investigation.

Here we explore the hypothesis that the fine combs found as grave goods in Arica archaeological sites were produced not only for combing the hair, but above all to mechanically remove head lice and their eggs. Comb artifacts emerged during the Formative period (ca. 1,450 to 2,450 BP) likely associated with the increasing complexity of hairstyles, ornamentation and social stratification. Cassman (1997) reported that most combs were found among grave goods of females. She suggested that females were likely responsible for creating complex hairstyles especially for men based on mummy hairstyles. Also she hypothesized that women were using combs in the weaving process, since weaving appeared to be a female occupation as well, based on grave good distributions. Thus, microscopic investigation of these ancient combs was performed to gather bio-cultural information on their original usage. If the combs were used primarily, or even occasionally for textile manufacture, they would have a preponderance of textile fiber evidence. On the other hand, we would expect to find eggs and lice, or their body parts, and human hair between the tines, if they were used primarily for grooming or delousing.

Materials and Methods

We analyzed 73 pre-Columbian combs housed at the Museo Arqueologico San Miguel de Azapa, Universidad de Tarapaca, Arica, Chile. The combs in this study came from the grave goods of five late Arica sites excavated during the 1960s and 1980s: two from Arican coastal sites (Playa Miller-4/PLM4 and Playa Miller-6/PLM6), one from the Camarones coast (Camarones-8/CAM8) and two agropastoral inland sites in the Azapa Valley (Azapa-71/AZ71 and Azapa 71A) (Dauelsberg 1972; Focacci 1974; Hidalgo and Focacci 1986; Munoz 1989; Santoro 1980). Of the available combs we selected 41 that had intact tines, and excluded all that had been cleaned previously for museum display. The combs have a temporal range from the Middle Period (950 to 1,350 BP), the Late Intermediate (650 to 950 BP), and into the Late Period (418 to 650 BP, Table 1). Archaeologists using the cultural contexts of the collective assemblages associated with each comb made these specific temporal assignments (Dauelsberg 1972; Focacci 1974; Hidalgo and Focacci 1986; Munoz 1989; Santoro 1980).

Procedures

The following variables were systematically quantified in the combs: (a) shape and size, (b) type of raw materials for manufacture, (c) number of tines, (d) presence and absence of any stages of P. humanus capitis embedded in the tines of the combs, (e) gap separation measured at the points of the tines, and (f) types of fibers or other detritus embedded between the tines.

All combs were analyzed under a 10x magnification lens. We systematically inspected an area of 2 by 2 [cm.sup.2] on each comb to count and collect all evidence including fibers, eggs and lice (Figure 1). To follow conventions, here we report the observations scored as per 1 [cm.sup.2] area. We took two readings in each artifact and averaged counts. Microsamples of the combs (tines and fibers) were collected for identification of raw materials at the Bioarchaeology Laboratory, Universidad de Tarapaca. Ectoparasites collected were studied using light and electronic scanning microscopy.

Five reed comb fragments were available for sampling and sent to Beta Analytic (Miami, USA) for AMS radiocarbon dating. Two of these samples were from an adjacent and inland Azapa Valley site (AZ6) and had representative fragmentary tines with sufficient sample sizes available for dating (Table 2).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was done with Winstat software (version 2001.1 for Windows). The null hypothesis was rejected at p < 0.05, which was regarded as significant. We also did descriptive statistics on comb morphology, and correlation coefficient analysis for tine separation and egg density.

Results

The five conventional radiocarbon dated combs ranged in age from 240 to 800 BP. Two dates taken from the inland site AZ6 cluster with the Late Intermediate period and the three coastal samples were from the Late Period (Table 2). The two sigma calibration of the dates pushed the three dates from the coastal sites PLM4 and PLM6 to the contact period. There were a few Spanish artifacts such as glass beads or iron nails associated with these sites. However, the main archaeological contexts associated with these individuals had artifacts from the San Miguel and Gentilar cultural phases and Inka cultural influence (Hidalgo and Focacci 1986).

All combs were square shaped with a double row of tines (Figures 1 and 2). The 41 analyzed combs measured, on average, 62.4 mm (length) [SD = 16] by 62.7 mm (width) [SD = 15.2]. All combs, except one, were manufactured with tines tightly packed and held together in the middle by two horizontal wooden bars (one on each side) wrapped with fine cotton or naturally pigmented or dyed camelid threads (Figures 1 and 2). For these combs, 87.8% (36/41) were produced with monochrome threads and 12.9% (5/41) had decoration made from wrapping with camelid threads with two contrasting colors to form geometric patterns (Figures 1 and 2). The combs were made by tightly packing carefully sanded or smoothed wooden tines. Since tines spanned both sides of the comb, they were symmetrical, with the arbitrary left side having an average of 40.6 tines (SD = 13.7) and the right side having 42.5 tines (SD = 14).

The only fiber embedded in the combs was human hair; no fibers were associated with textile production, despite cotton and camelid fiber use in binding the combs in the first place. On those combs positive for P. humanus capitis, 17.4% (4/23) presented human hair embedded in the tines and 82.6% (19/23) did not have any type of fibers present. On those combs negative for P. humanus capitis, 16.7% (3/18) had evidence of human hair and 83.3% (15/18) did not present any type of fiber, human or textile-related (Table 3).

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses of eight comb threads that secured the tines in place showed the presence of cotton fibers (Gossypium spp.) in five cases, two cases used animal fibers only (scale patterns resemble camelid fibers) and one case had a mixture of both animal and cotton fibers (Figures 6 and 7). The SEM micromorphology of the tines (Comb PLM6 T11 3398.1) and the wooden bar or block that held the tines in place (Comb PLM6T10 3384) indicated the use of reed (Phragmites australis) as the raw material (Figures 8-9). Reed was readily available locally in the wetland areas of the river deltas and along the Lluta and San Jose rivers.

A total of 23/41 combs (56%) were positive for Pediculus humanus capitis (nits/eggs and/or lice). Of these, 10 (43.5%) had nits/eggs only, 12 (52.2%) nits/eggs and lice, and 1 (4.3%) comb had lice only. The positive combs had an average separation or tine gap of 490 pm (SD = 217) at its widest point and the negative cases had similar values (470 pm, SD = 240). At the midline the tines presented minimal or no gap separation. The positive combs presented an average of 3.4 eggs/[cm.sup.2] (SD = 3.7) and an average of 0.7 lice/[cm.sup.2] (SD = 0.8) (adults and nymphs) trapped in the tines. The correlation between tine separation and egg density was low (r = 0.2). From positive combs we collected and microscopically analyzed a total of 47 lice (14 adults and 33 nymphs) and 283 nits/eggs (Figures 3-5). Of these nits/eggs, 91 (32.1%) were operculated or unhatched, 97 (34.3%) hatched, 2 (0.7%) were egg fragments with cementing substance and 93 (32.9%) were fragmented eggs or nits.

Table 1 shows that individuals in coastal sites from the Late Intermediate Period (PLM4 and CAM 8), more frequently had comb offerings than people from inland Middle Period sites (AZ71, AZ71A), 46 vs 20 respectively. But the Late Intermediate Period had 53.6% prevalence of combs infested with lice, while the Middle Period had 75%. Combs coming from coastal sites (n=16) tended to have similar egg densities compared to inland sites (n= 6), with 3.4 vs. 3.3 eggs/[cm.sup.2] and similar lice densities of 0.6 vs. 1.2 (n=10 and n=3) respectively. Table 3, provides a summary of all analyzed cases.

Discussion

The cultural evidence associated with the five sites presented, revealed complex sociopolitical organization, significant population density, status competition, mobility and large spheres of interaction (Goldstein1995-1996; Hidalgo and Focacci 1986; Munoz 1989; Munoz 2005; Santoro 1980). These social variables increased the probability for ectoparasite infestations, and the need for lice control.

An alternative interpretation to the head lice removal hypothesis is that the combs were simply manufactured to groom the hair. In this case the presence of parasites embedded in the tines simply would reflect health conditions when the hair was combed. However, from a practical point of view, anyone who has tried to use a lice comb on unruly hair would know that this is impractical--hair that is tangled would tear necessitating the use of fingers, or more efficiently, a widely spaced comb first, and then secondarily a densely packed lice comb. In Arica during these periods, long hair appears to be the norm, thus the compact combs would not have been the ideal tool for grooming hair. In the archaeological record for Arica, a few combs have been found that contained both narrow and widely spaced options (Figure 10, comb from PLM4 dated 240 [+ or -] 30 BP). The presence of the two options, narrow and wider spaced combs, plus the predominance of long hairstyles, made the specialized use of compact combs for lice removal more plausible. There were extra labor costs involved in making a dense comb, especially for those with the decorative wrapping, when a widely spaced comb would have been more effective for grooming hair in general. Thus the comb data indicated these prehistoric Arica populations created functional objects for delousing and grooming. Considering the small size of the combs, narrow separation of the tines, absence of embedded camelid hair or cotton fibers, the labor intensive production techniques, the reduced efficiency of combing tangled hair with a dense comb, and especially the presence of lice eggs, nymphs and adult lice trapped in the tines, all add up to indicate these combs were specifically manufactured to remove lice.

An average modern louse egg is ovoid and about 888 [micro]m in length (SD = 27) and 460 [micro]m wide (SD = 22) (Kadosaka and Kaneko 1985). In our ongoing studies of archaeological head lice eggs (n=17), these measured 880 [micro]m in length (SD = 55) by 370 [micro]m wide (SD = 27). Ancient eggs were thus slightly smaller in width compared to modern samples, which may be attributed to the highly dehydrated state of the ancient remains. In addition, an adult head louse measured about 2-3 mm in length. Thus, for effective head lice removal, a delousing instrument must have had small enough gaps to trap not only adults but also nymphs and eggs. According to Larsen (2010) modern lice combs have tines with a distance of no more than 200-300 [micro]m apart to efficiently remove all stages of lice. A gap of 61 [micro]m will remove 100% of all life stages of a louse. The positive Arica prehistoric combs in this study had an average separation or tine gap of 490 [micro]m (minimum =100[micro]m), less efficient than modern combs, but fine enough to remove eggs, and therefore later life stages too (Table 3).

The correlation between teeth gap and egg density was low (r = 0.2), perhaps the consequences of intentional cleaning of the combs in prehistory. Considering the average 3.4 nit or egg density in the prehistoric combs, along with the average dimensions of the complete combs (6 x 6 cm) and the fact that head lice and eggs were trapped at the midline of the combs, then each comb had the potential to catch about 80 eggs and 17 lice on a 24 [cm.sup.2] area, if both sides of the comb were used. The observed and extrapolated values, as well as the different stages of lice trapped in the combs (eggs, nymphs and adults) showed that these ancient artifacts were excellent tools to reduce population or carrying capacity of lice on individuals who regularly used the combs.

In Arica and surrounding areas, combs for delousing were manufactured for centuries. Though combs were effective tools for removing head lice, prevalence of lice was still high during the Middle and late Periods (Arriaza et al. 2012; Reinhard and Buikstra 2003). Several factors, such as preference for long hair, complex hairstyles likely worn for days, and increasing population densities over time, increased the likelihood of head lice infestations. Moreover, the population of Pediculus humanus capitis was likely only temporarily altered by grooming, considering the high reproductive rate of head lice.

Mechanical removal of head lice, even of the larger adults is a laborious task, and a time consuming effort undertaken usually by close kin. Efficient nit picking measures require a collaborative effort; someone else needs to do the grooming either using their nails to get adults, and/or an artifact such as a comb to remove eggs which are cemented at the base of a strand of hair and all other stages (Burkhart and Burkhart 2005).

It is not known if ancient communities used plant-based deterrents or shampoos to remove ectoparasites, but a heavily infected individual could have taken the drastic solution to cut off their hair completely, as is done still today in many societies. However, in the Andes, ancient people took much care and pride in their long hair, and during Inka times it was considered a punishment to have one's haircut (Cieza de Leon 1553; de La Vega 1609). In Arica, mummies with short hair from these sites are infrequent; about 11% (18/154), which includes children (Arriaza et al. 1986). On the contrary, ancient Arican populations had long, healthy, thick hair. After 3,450 BP women styled their hair in simple single or double braids, but men could have very elaborate hairstyles (Arriaza et al. 1986). Thus, in northern Chile, extreme haircuts would have been for the most part out of the question and an exception rather than a common remedy to treat head lice.

Instead, ancient Arica people learned how to cope with lice infestations and likely spent many hours grooming and removing head lice. Combs developed starting in the Formative period, were one form of partial control. Head lice presence was likely an annoying pandemic in the ancient Americas. In fact, our ongoing studies have shown that 84.5% (186/220) of Arica mummies (coastal and inland) show presence of Pediculus humanus capitis eggs (Arriaza 2013). Prevalence was so high that during the Late Horizon Period, the ethnohistorical accounts told us that the Inkas requested people too poor to pay taxes, to pay in live lice so that they would be used to giving of what they had produced (Cieza de Leon 1553; de La Vega 1609). Also this may have been an attempt to discourage lice accumulation among the impoverished.

It appeared being near the ocean made little difference in the carrying capacity of combs. However a different conclusion is drawn, when the comb data are compared to nit or egg densities found on the actual heads of the mummies. A complementary ongoing study of the hair of individuals from corresponding sites and time periods shows that Arica coastal populations had an average of 1.5 eggs/[cm.sup.2], while inland agropastoral individuals had 3.1 eggs/[cm.sup.2] (p<0.001) (Arriaza 2013). Given the natural coastal setting and temperate water, coastal people were probably bathing, cleaning, grooming and delousing more often than inland settlers could. Conceivably this is the reason why coastal individuals tended to have more combs in their grave goods and why coastal mummies have significantly fewer eggs. The combs, however, were equally efficient at lice removal whether at the coast or inland, and therefore do not have significantly different outcomes, unlike the studies of lice embedded in the hair of mummies themselves.

Conclusions

Our study showed for the first time that ancient combs found in five prehistoric Arica sites were solid testimony of prehistoric health practices and efforts to control endemic lice infestations. Head lice combs were probably the oldest antiparasitic therapy, and are still used today, with very few adaptions in thousands of years.

Comb innovations and development were a cultural response to an endemic and annoying problem. Ancient Arica populations learned that comb tines needed to be sufficiently packed together to remove lice and their eggs efficiently. These populations, particularly during the Late Intermediate and Late Period, actively sought a practical solution to minimize pediculosis, creating combs from raw materials that were locally available. Combs contributed to control, but despite their relative effectiveness, pediculosis was a persistent problem for these ancient populations. Our regional findings increase the spectrum of prophylactic health measures available in antiquity. It provides detailed information on ancient lice combs and degree of infestations. We show for the first time that Arica prehistoric combs were manufactured to control head lice, independent of secondary usages. They were not just artifacts that accompanied the dead in the afterlife, but practical and fully functional health improvement tools. Prehistoric Old and New World populations were affected by pediculosis, and both created similar solutions, easy to grip, strong double-sided lice combs.

Recibido: marzo 2014. Aceptado: agosto 2014.

Acknowledgements: We thank Fondecyt Grants 1100059 and 1130261 for national and international financial support. Special thanks to Natalia Aravena, Susana Monsalve, Hipolito Nunez and Elias Pantigoso for their assistance during data collection and microanalyses and to Eliana Belmonte for her assistance in the identification of the vegetal materials. Jorg Heukelbach is thankful to the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico--CNPq, Brazil, where he is a research fellow. Finally, we would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the manuscript.

References Cited

Araujo, A., L.F. Ferreira, N. Guidon, N. Maues Da Serra Freire, K. Reinhard and K. Dittmar 2000. Ten thousand years of head lice infection. Parasitology Today 16:269.

Arriaza, B. 2013. South American Mummies. Conservation and Research. Paper presented at the 8th World Congress on Mummy Studies. Rio do Janeiro.

Arriaza, B., M. Allison, V. Standen, G. Focacci and J. Chacama 1986. Peinados precolombinos. Chungara 16-17:353-375.

Arriaza, B., N. Orellana, H. Barbosa, R. Menna-Barreto, A. Araujo and V. Standen 2012. Severe head lice infestation in an Andean mummy of Arica, Chile. Journal of Parasitology 98:433-436.

Arriaza, B., V. Standen, H. Nunez and K. Reinhard 2013. Study of archaeological nits/eggs of Pediculus humanus capitis by scanning electron microscopy. Micron 45:145-149.

Burkhart, C.N. and C.G. Burkhart 2005. Head lice: Scientific assessment of the nit sheath with clinical ramifications and therapeutic options. Journal American Academy Dermatology 53:129-133.

Cassman, V. 1997. A Reconsideration of Prehistoric Ethnicity and Status in Northern Chile. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Arizona State University, Tucson.

Cieza de Leon, P. 1553. Primera Parte de la Cronica del Peru. Martin de Montesdoca, Sevilla.

Dauelsberg, P. 1972. Ensayo de informacion general del Departamento de Arica. In Enciclopedia de Arica. Editorial de Enciclopedias Regionales Ltda., Santiago.

De la Vega, G. 1943 [1609]. Comentarios Reales de los Incas, editado por A. Rosenblat. Emece editores, Buenos Aires.

Focacci, G. 1974. Excavaciones en el cementerio Playa Miller 7, Arica (Chile). Chungara 3:23-74.

Goldstein, P. 1995-1996. Tiwanaku settlement patterns of the Azapa Valley, Chile. New data and the legacy of Percy Daueslberg. Dialogo Andino 14/15:57-73.

Hidalgo, J. and G. Focacci 1986. Multietnicidad en Arica, S XVI. Evidencias etnohistoricas y arqueologicas. Chungara 16-17:134-147.

Kadosaka, T. and K. Kaneko 1985. Studies on sucking lice (Anoplura) in Japan (Part 6). A comparative observation of human lice eggs. The Japan Society of Medical Entomology and Zoology 36:343-348.

Larsen, K. 2010. Mechanical removal of lice and eggs. In Management and Control of Head Lice Infestations, edited by J. Heukelbach, pp. 54-56. UNI-MED Verlag AG, Bremen.

Mumcuoglu, K. 2008. The louse comb: past and present. American Entomologist 54:164-166.

Mumcuoglu, K. and J. Zias 1988. Head lice, Pediculus humanus capitis (Anoplura: Pediculidae) from hair combs excavated in Israel and dated from the first century B.C. to the eight century A.D. Journal of Medical Entomology 25:545-547.

--1989. How the ancient de-loused themselves. Biblical Archaeology Review 14:66-69.

Munoz, I. 1989. Perfil de la organizacion economico-social en la desembocadura del rio Camarones: Periodo Intermedio Tardio e Inca. Chungara 22:30-40.

--2005. Espacio social y areas de actividad en asentamientos agricolas prehispanicos tardios en la sierra de Arica. Bulletin de l'Institut Frangais d'Etudes Andines 34:321-355.

Palma, R. 1991. Ancient head lice in a wooden comb from Antione, Egypt. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 77:194.

Pilger, D., J. Heukelbach, A. Khakban, F. Oliveira, G. Fengler and H. Feldmeier 2010. Household-wide ivermectin treatment for head lice in an impoverished community: randomized observer-blinded controlled trial. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 88:90-96.

Reinhard, K. and J. Buikstra 2003. Louse infestation of the Chiribaya Culture, Southern Peru: Variation in prevalence by age and sex. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 98:173-179.

Rivera, M., K. Mumcuoglu, R. Matheny and D. Matheny 2008. Head lice eggs, Anthropophthirus capitis, from mummies of the Chinchorro tradition, Camarones 15-D, northern Chile. Chungara Revista de Antropologia Chilena 40:31-39.

Santoro, C. 1980. Estudio de un Yacimiento Funerario Arqueologico del Extremo Norte de Chile, 1300 a.C.-1300 d.C. Tesis de grado en Arqueologia, Universidad Catolica del Norte, Antofagasta.

Zuniga, I. and J. Caro 2010. Pediculosis: una ectoparasitosis emergente en Mexico. Revista de Enfermedades Infecciosas en Pediatria 24:56-63.

Bernardo Arriaza [1] *, Vivien G. Standen [2], Jorg Heukelbach [3], Vicki Cassman [4] and Felix Olivares [5]

[1] Instituto de Alta Investigacion, Universidad de Tarapaca, Arica, Chile. barriazaarica@gmail.com. Corresponding author.

[2] Departamento de Antropologia, Universidad de Tarapaca, Arica, Chile.vivien.standen@gmail.com

[3] Department of Community Health, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil. ukelbach@web.de

[4] Art Conservation, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States. vcassman@art-sci.udel.edu

[5] Programa de pregrado en Antropologia, Universidad de Tarapaca, Arica, Chile. strong5529@gmail.com

Table 1. Combs studied by period and nits/eggs/lice prevalence.

Peines analizados por periodo y prevalencia de liendres y piojos.

Period                 Sites      Location   Comb    Selected
                                             total    combs

Middle              AZ71, AZ71a    Valley     20        8
Late Intermediate   PLM4, CAM8     Coast      46        28
Late                   PLM6        Coast       7        5
Total                                         73        41

Period              Number of    Number of    Number of      Total
                     positive     positive     positive    number of
                    combs with   combs with   combs with    positive
                    nits/eggs    lice only    nits/eggs      combs
                       only                    and lice

Middle                  3            0            3            6
Late Intermediate       6            1            8            15
Late                    1            0            1            2
Total                   10           1            12           23

Period              Prevalence
                       (%)

Middle                  75
Late Intermediate      53.6
Late                    40
Total                   56

Table 2. Summary of radiocarbon dates for combs.

Resumen de fechados radiocarbonicos de los peines.

Reference        Type of    Conventional   Sigma   13C/12C
Sample           material   radiocarbon             Ratio
                  dated       age (BP)               %0

AZ6T2/             Reed         800         30      -24.7
120.13.1          (tine)

AZ6T195/           Reed         560         30      -22.4
12843             (tine)

PLM4T96/ 8548      Wood         240         30      -25.2
                  (tine)

PLM6T11/3398       Reed         270         30      -25.4
                  (tine)

PLM6T11/3398.1     Reed         260         30      -23.7
                  (tine)

Reference                 Calibrated             1 Sigma calibrated
Sample                    Intercept              (68% probability)
                             Date

AZ6T2/           Cal AD 1230 (Cal BP 720) and   Cal AD 1220 to 1260
120.13.1         Cal AD 1230 (Cal BP 720) and   (Cal BP 730 to 690)
                 Cal AD 1240 (Cal BP 710) and
                 Cal AD 1250 (Cal BP 700) and
                 Cal AD 1250 (Cal BP 700)

AZ6T195/         Cal AD 1400 (Cal BP 540)       Cal AD 1320 to 1340
12843                                           (Cal BP 630 to 610)
                                                and Cal AD 1390 to
                                                1410 (Cal BP 560 to
                                                540)

PLM4T96/ 8548    Cal AD 1650 (Cal BP 300)       Cal AD 1650 to 1670
                                                (Cal BP 300 to 280)
                                                and Cal AD 1780 to
                                                1800 (Cal BP 170 to
                                                160) and Cal AD 1950
                                                to 1950
                                                (Cal BP Oto 0)

PLM6T11/3398     Cal AD 1650 (Cal BP 300)       Cal AD 1640 to 1650
                                                (Cal BP 310 to 300)

PLM6T11/3398.1   Cal AD 1650 (Cal BP 300)       Cal AD 1640 to 1660
                                                (Cal BP 310 to 290)

Reference         2 Sigma calibrated       Lab and number
Sample            (95% probability)

AZ6T2/           Cal AD 1190 to 1200    Beta Analytic 355399
120.13.1         (Cal BP 760 to 750)
                 and
                 Cal AD 1210 to 1270
                 (Cal BP 740 to 680)

AZ6T195/         Cal AD 1310 to 1360    Beta Analytic 355400
12843            (Cal BP 640 to 590)
                 and Cal AD 1390 to
                 1430 (Cal BP 560 to
                 520)

PLM4T96/ 8548    Cal AD 1640 to 1670    Beta Analytic 365034
                 (Cal BP 310 to 280)
                 and Cal AD 1780 to
                 1800 (Cal BP 170 to
                 150) and
                 Cal AD 1940 to post
                 1950 (Cal BP 10 to
                 post 1950)

PLM6T11/3398     Cal AD 1520 to 1570    Beta Analytic 365035
                 (Cal BP 430 to 380)
                 and Cal AD 1590 to
                 1590 (Cal BP 360 to
                 360) and Cal AD 1630
                 to 1670 (Cal BP 320
                 to 280) and Cal AD
                 1780 to 1800 (Cal BP
                 170 to 160) and Cal
                 AD 1950 to 1950 (Cal
                 BP 0 to 0)

PLM6T11/3398.1   Cal AD 1520 to 1560    Beta Analytic 365036
                 (Cal BP 420 to 390)
                 and Cal AD 1630 to
                 1670 (Cal BP 320 to
                 280) and Cal AD 1780
                 to 1800 (Cal BP 170
                 to 150) and Cal AD
                 1950 to 1950 (Cal BP
                 0 to 0)

Table 3. Summary of cases analyzed.

Resumen de casos analizados.

Site        Tomb         Cultural period    Pediculosis   Lice counts
                                                          reduced to 1
                                                           [cm.sup.2]
                                                             area *

AZ71a   T22_4627.2      Middle              Negative      0
AZ71a   T29_4661.1      Middle              Negative      0
AZ71a   T22_4627        Middle              Positive      1
AZ71a   T22 4627.1      Middle              Positive      2.4
AZ71a   T66 4808        Middle              Positive      0
AZ71a   T95 4960        Middle              Positive      0
AZ71    T118 5025       Middle              Positive      0
AZ71    T151 5154       Middle              Positive      0.1
PLM4    T10_3384.1      Late Intermediate   Negative      0
PLM4    T18 6756        Late Intermediate   Negative      0
PLM4    T25 6935.1      Late Intermediate   Negative      0
PLM4    T30 7075        Late Intermediate   Negative      0
PLM4    T34 7158        Late Intermediate   Negative      0
PLM4    T59 7724        Late Intermediate   Negative      0
PLM4    Til9_9139       Late Intermediate   Negative      0

PLM4    T119_9139.2     Late Intermediate   Negative      0
PLM4    T120_9164       Late Intermediate   Negative      0
PLM4    T138 9552       Late Intermediate   Negative      0
PLM4    T140_9607       Late Intermediate   Negative      0
PLM4    T171 10356      Late Intermediate   Negative      0
PLM4    T18 6756.2(c)   Late Intermediate   Positive      0
PLM4    T23 6878        Late Intermediate   Positive      0
PLM4    T23 6878.1      Late Intermediate   Positive      0.1
PLM4    T50 7496        Late Intermediate   Positive      0
PLM4    T70 7982        Late Intermediate   Positive      0.4
PLM4    T94 8511        Late Intermediate   Positive      0.4
PLM4    T94 8511.1      Late Intermediate   Positive      0.1
PLM4    T96 8548(**)    Late Intermediate   Positive      0.1
PLM4    T117 9097       Late Intermediate   Positive      0
PLM4    T135 9481       Late Intermediate   Positive      0
PLM4    T136 9514       Late Intermediate   Positive      0
PLM4    T140 9606       Late Intermediate   Positive      0.4
CAM8    T19_20261       Late Intermediate   Negative      0
CAM8    T12 20120       Late Intermediate   Positive      0.1
CAM8    T12 20111       Late Intermediate   Positive      2.5
CAM8    T14 20185       Late Intermediate   Positive      0.9
PLM6    T10_3384        Late                Negative      0
PLM6    Til 3395        Late                Negative      0
PLM6    Tll_3398        Late                Negative      0
PLM6    T7 3334         Late                Positive      0
PLM6    Tll_3398.1      Late                Positive      0.6

Site      Nit/egg      No. tines    No. tines      Gap
           counts      right side   left side   separation
        reduced to 1                              at the
         [cm.sup.2]                             points of
          area (*)                              the tines
                                                   (mm)

AZ71a   0                  50          47          0.61
AZ71a   0                  36          36          0.21
AZ71a   2.5                61          55          0.43
AZ71a   8                  58          49          0.41
AZ71a   7.9                30          20          0.93
AZ71a   0.4                34          30          0.1
AZ71    0.8                24          27          0.65
AZ71    0.3                25          25          0.78
PLM4    0                  49          49          0.55
PLM4    0                  30          29          0.77
PLM4    0                  34          27          0.57
PLM4    0                  29          29          0.98
PLM4    0                  27          27          0.13
PLM4    0                  54          54          0.3
PLM4    0                  60          60          0.28
PLM4    0                  58          58          0.2
PLM4    0                  69          63          0.56
PLM4    0                  44          44          0.19
PLM4    0                  41          41          0.39
PLM4    0                  54          54          0.23
PLM4    10                 54          55          0.22
PLM4    0.3                21          21          0.42
PLM4    0.1                60          59          0.43
PLM4    0.1                31          31          0.45
PLM4    0.3                31          32          0.88
PLM4    8.9                57          57          0.32
PLM4    1.1                52          52          0.31
PLM4    0                  61          24          0.45
PLM4    0.3                52          52          0.57
PLM4    1.8                39          39          0.44
PLM4    7.3                43          43          0.38
PLM4    0.3                61          61          0.36
CAM8    0                  28          28          0.83
CAM8    3.3                34          34          0.41
CAM8    9.4                32          32          0.37
CAM8    7.8                24          25          0.35
PLM6    0                  50          50          0.64
PLM6    0                  24          24          0.45
PLM6    0                  36          36          0.54
PLM6    2.1                24          24          0.85
PLM6    2.1                61          61          0.75

Site    Maximum comb   Maximum comb   Maximum comb     Type of
        length (mm)     width (mm)      central      fiber found
                                       thickness     within the
                                          (mm)          tines

AZ71a       71.0           60.7              10.6    None
AZ71a       43.5           42.7               8.2    None
AZ71a       80.5           69.2              10.2    None
AZ71a       77.5           69.1              12.2    None
AZ71a       44.8           40.4               6.8    None
AZ71a       86.2           82.6              16.1    Human hair
AZ71        65.7           63.4              13.7    None
AZ71        66.2           59.9              13.2    None
PLM4        79.4           89.3              10.8    None
PLM4        28.0           34.3               6.8    None
PLM4        59.8           75.4              10.2    Human hair
PLM4        83.7           92.1              15.6    None
PLM4        36.3           39.5               7.1    None
PLM4        83.4           77.1              12.1    None
PLM4        81.8           77.5              11.3    Human hair
PLM4        63.4           61.1               8.0    None
PLM4        78.6           76.3              12.4    None
PLM4        59.3           51.9               9.4    None
PLM4        69.4           80.1              12.9    None
PLM4        62.4           59.1              11.6    None
PLM4        67.0           54.1               8.6    None
PLM4        45.8           49.8               8.6    None
PLM4        69.2           60.7               9.2    None
PLM4        62.2           66.0              12.1    None
PLM4        69.5           62.3               9.6    Human hair
PLM4        65.4           64.3               8.8    None
PLM4        64.5           57.2               9.9    None
PLM4        71.4           72.0               6.5    None
PLM4        64.6           79.5              12.3    None
PLM4        56.3           62.6               9.7    None
PLM4        53.8           55.8              11.2    None
PLM4        71.3           67.7              11.3    Human hair
CAM8        84.0           82.5              17.8    Human hair
CAM8        39.3           42.2               8.9    None
CAM8        42.6           44.3               8.8    None
CAM8        42.3           45.3               7.8    Human hair
PLM6        67.5           77.1              12.4    None
PLM6        32.4           40.1               9.8    None
PLM6        45.2           62.2              12.1    None
PLM6        38.5           42.0              10.2    None
PLM6        83.2           82.9              24.0    None

* All values should be multiplied by 4 to obtain "in situ" mean
nit/egg and lice density scored values.

** Wooden comb, compact tines had 0.45 mm gap and the widely spread
1.7 cm gap.
COPYRIGHT 2014 Universidad de Tarapaca
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2014 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Arriaza, Bernardo; Standen, Vivien G.; Heukelbach, Jorg; Cassman, Vicki; Olivares, Felix
Publication:Revista Chungara. Revista de Antropologia Chilena
Date:Oct 1, 2014
Words:5704
Previous Article:De escuela evangelizadora colonial a sistema educativo competitivo y segmentado en isla de pascua.
Next Article:Tai n fijke xipa rakizuameluwun. Historia, Colonialismo y Resistencias desde el Pais Mapuche.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters