Printer Friendly

Pavement smoothness index relationships. (Recent Communications Products).

Publication No. FHWA-RD-02-057

Nearly all State highway agencies use smoothness specifications to ensure that hot-mix asphalt (HMA) and portland cement concrete (PCC) pavements are built to high levels of smoothness. Not only is an initially smooth pavement generally indicative of quality workmanship, but also it has been shown to last longer than a pavement that is built with a rougher level.

About half of all current State smoothness specifications for HMA and more than three-fourths of all current PCC smoothness specifications are centered around the Profile Index (PI), as often measured using a profilograph. The vast majority of these specifications use a 5-millimeter (0.2-inch) blanking band in computing PI (i.e., P15-mm). Unfortunately, because of the technical limitations of the profilograph equipment and PI computation procedures, the adequacy of PI5-mm in characterizing roughness and having it relate to user response has come into question.

The International Roughness Index (IRI) or the PI using a 0.0-mm blanking band (PI0.0) seem to provide better measures of smoothness and better correlation with user response. However, one barrier to more widespread implementation of these new smoothness standards is the lack of objective, verifiable correlation methods for use in establishing specification limits using the IRI or PI0.0. Assistance in selecting appropriate IRI and PI0.0 specification limits is needed to provide a basis for modifying current specifications to these more reproducible and portable smoothness indices. This research effort has developed a series of relationships between IRI and PI that can assist States in transitioning to an IRI or PI0.0 smoothness specification for HMA and PCC pavements.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Superintendent of Documents
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Public Roads
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Mar 1, 2003
Words:266
Previous Article:Study of LTPP laboratory resilient modulus test data and response characteristics. (Recent Communications Products).
Next Article:Back-calculation of layer parameters for LTPP test sections, volume II: layered elastic analysis for flexible and rigid pavements. (Recent...
Topics:


Related Articles
Pavement management systems - past, present and future.
Enhancing Pavement Smoothness.
Paper call.
It's the ride that count$.
CPTP update: highlights from the past year demonstrate that the Concrete Pavement Technology Program is continuing its progress in making road...
The case for performance standards: ambitious, but achievable, expectations are the first step to improve safety, to reduce construction-related...
KDOT releases new research on pavement smoothness and soil stabilization.
Pavement surface condition/performance assessment; reliability and relevancy of procedures and technologies.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters