Printer Friendly

Paul Haigh: Apologies to cameramen, but itOs time directors got it right for once.

Byline: Paul Haigh

LAST week this column included an attack on TV coverage (no change there then) that suggested cameramen were to blame for the practice of focusing on the leader, or sometimes two leaders, at the end of races, in such a way that all other runners were excluded and the interest therefore minimised.

Bob Vickery of the RaceTech team, which is responsible for providing pictures to both RUK and ATR, and, although the terrestrial channels also have their own cameras, for most of those used by the BBC and C4, phoned to say this was very unjust; the cameramen are just as true racing people as anyone else and just as aware of whatOs vital and whatOs just arty- farty nonsense that might win them promotion or awards.

After listening carefully to what Bob had to say IOm very happy to correct the injustice.

RaceTech has the not unreasonable basic rule that whatever else is shown, the winner must be in shot as he or she passes the post. RaceTech, which also has to provide pictures the stewards can use, always has two cameras focused on the finish [ETH] one the wide-angle, which should include the other runners, although even that may not be possible, particularly in the jumps season, when a winner may draw 30 lengths clear; the other the close-up. The decision on which of the two shots to transmit is taken not by the cameramen but by the director.

Okay, IOve got it now. Understanding has dawned. The cameramen are therefore excused their lines, and by way of compensation can have an extra ration of tuck. The directors, however, can all write out not 1000 but 2000 times: OI must not close in on the front one or two at the end of a race if I can possibly help it because arty-farty shots of this nature do nothing to increase the interest, and in fact diminish it because, even if you do choose to ignore the each-way punters, whatOs important in a finish is how quickly horses are travelling in relation to the rest.O

On my desk by four oOclock please, and any smudgings or crossings out, especially by the terrestrials, and you can all jolly well start again.
COPYRIGHT 2005 MGN LTD
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 
Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Sports
Publication:The Racing Post (London, England)
Date:Nov 12, 2005
Words:376
Previous Article:Paul Haigh: SLA critics continue fight for elections.
Next Article:Youngone comes of age for rookie Grayson: Wolverhampton.


Related Articles
Letters: Artistic touches add nothing; Roy Alexander feels television coverage of racing is being ruined.
Letter: Why close-ups are simply not the right way to go; Gerry Deeprose argues that viewers of televised racing want the bigger picture.
Paul Haigh: Just a form of words or is it spin? You be the judge.
Paul Haigh on Saturday: Jockey wars: the DVD game.
Paul Haigh: Smoothing over to be done, as Olittle local difficultyO benefits no-one.
Paul Haigh: Ignoring drug threat is just not an option.
Cheltenham briefing: Long-absent Lingo looks to make up for lost time.
Racing Post 0pinion: OTackling corruption may look like mission impossible, but itOs no good arguing that it canOt be doneO.
Highly commended; Post pair just miss out on top sports writing award.
Grieving widow's letters misery; 'Died' and 'passed away' on mail to her husband.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters