Printer Friendly

Patterns of care and outcomes of adult osteosarcoma in a tertiary care cancer centre in Pakistan.

Byline: Saba Imtiaz and Ather Kazmi

Abstract

Objective: To present our experience of treatment outcomes in adult osteosarcoma patients.

Methods: The retrospective study was conducted at the Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre Lahore Pakistan and comprised data related to 74 adult patients with osteosarcoma from 1995 to 2009. The treatment plan consisted of surgery preceded by neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. SPSS 16 was used for statistical analysis.

Results: Of the 74 patients in the study 58(78%) were in the 18-29 age group with an overall male-to-female ratio of 3:1. The commonest site of disease was femur 30 (43%). Of the 66(89%) patients undergoing definitive surgery 59(89.4%) had amputation. The remaining 7(10.6%) limb salvage operations were in the neo-adjuvant chemotherapy group. Good histopathological response rates in high-dose methotrexate containing regimens and other regimens were similar with an overall good response rate of 18/51 (35%). The commonest site of relapse was lung. Twelve out of 27 (44%) patients with lung-only metastases underwent successful metastatectomy. For patients with localised disease at presentation 3-year event-free survival was 30% and 3-year overall survival was 71%. For patients with metastases at presentation 3-year overall survival was 45%. Median overall survival for patients receiving high-dose methotrexate and other regimens was 1.7 years vs 2.9 years.

Conclusion: Adult osteosarcoma treated with cisplatin/doxorubicin based chemotherapy and surgery had good outcomes. The role of high-dose methotrexate in adult osteosarcoma remains uncertain.

Keywords: Chemotherapy Methotrexate Osteosarcoma Overall survival Pakistan. (JPMA 64: 1166; 2014)

Introduction

Osteosarcoma is a primary malignant bone tumour. It is an uncommon tumour in adults and accounts for less than 1 percent of all cancers diagnosed annually in the United States.1 Osteosarcoma has a bimodal age distribution with a major peak incidence in early adolescence and later in adults over the age of 651. There is scarcity of information about adult osteosarcoma. According to the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Programme (SEER) data analysis osteosarcoma in the age group of 25-59 years comprises approximately 28% of the reported cases.1 At all ages males are affected more frequently than females. In young patients it most often arises in the metaphysis of long bones such as the distal femur proximal tibia and proximal humerus.12 In the elderly osteosarcoma occurs more commonly in axial locations and in areas that have been previously radiated or have underlying bone abnormalities.

At diagnosis osteosarcoma is localised in one bone site in 80% of the cases and presents with metastases in about 20% of the patients. Lung is the most common metastatic site followed by bone. Other metastatic sites are uncommon.2

Current standard of treatment includes preoperative/neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery and postoperative/adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). With such multimodality therapy at least two-third patients with non-metastatic extremity osteosarcomas tend to be long-term survivors and up to 50 percent of those with limited pulmonary metastases can be cured of their disease. Extra-pulmonary metastases and multifocal osteosarcoma constitute a major problem. The aim of surgery is to completely resect the tumour to produce the minimum risk of local recurrence. Surgery for local disease can be carried out with an amputation or limb salvage depending on location and extent of disease and response of primary tumour to preoperative chemotherapy.2 The long-term survival rate of patients with osteosarcoma was 10-20% before the 1970s when treatment was mainly limb amputation.

Over the past three decades the development of surgical techniques and effective multi- agent systemic chemotherapy has led to improvement in disease-free and overall survival rates of upto 60-70%.2 NAC induces tumour necrosis in the primary tumour which facilitates surgical resection particularly limb salvage procedures and also provides early treatment of micro metastatic diseases. Patients with tumour necrosis in excess of 90% are classified as good responders while those with tumour necrosis less than 90% are classified as poor responders.2 The degree of tumour necrosis is used as a marker of chemo-sensitivity and has proven to be an important prognostic factor.34 However research has been unable to confirm that altering the AC regimen in poor responders improves overall outcomes.56 Most widely applied and studied NAC and AC regimens consist of a combination of cisplatin doxorubicin with/without high-dose methotrexate and/or ifosfamide.

Various study groups have shown that these drug combinations have the best 5-10 year survival rates of 70-72%.27 Patients with synchronous pulmonary metastatic disease are also treated with the same chemotherapy agents followed by resection of primary and metastatic disease albeit with poorer results. Multiple numbers of lung nodules and metastasis identified at the initial presentation of disease predict poor response.8 However there are studies showing complete surgical remission following pulmonary metastatectomy as the main prognostic factor. It has been shown that metastatectomy preceded or followed by chemotherapy improves long-term survival in recurrent pulmonary metastasis as well.9

There is paucity of comprehensive population-based data on occurrence and outcomes of osteosarcoma from our part of the world. We present here our experience of treatment outcomes in adult osteosarcoma patients and correlate our findings with published international data.

Patients and Methods

The retrospective study was conducted at the Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre Lahore Pakistan and comprised patient record from 1995 till August 2009. During the period 188 adult osteosarcoma patients were identified. Only patients who completed the planned treatment were included.

The total dose of chemotherapy for every 3-week cycle consisted of doxorubicin 90mg/m2 cisplatin 60mg/m2 and high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) 8gm/m2 with folinic acid rescue with variation in schedules in different regimens.

Data was analysed using SPSS version 16. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was used for calculation of event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates. EFS was defined as time interval between the date of last adjuvant treatment till the development of metastasis or local recurrence. OS was defined as time interval between the day of diagnosis and the time of death from any cause.

Table-1: Treatment Outcomes.

Limb amputations###59/66 (89)

Limb salvage###7/66 (10.6)

Histopathological response following NAC

Good###18 (35)

Poor###33 (65)

Good Histopathological response

HD MTX###7/20 (35)

Non HD MTX###11/31 (35)

Results

Of the 74 patients in the study 58(78%) were in the 18-29 age group and 7 (9.5%) were over 40 years of age with an overall male-to-female ratio of 3:1. The commonest site of disease was femur 30(43%) followed by tibia 27(37%) and fibula 5(7%). Humerus facial bone and extra-osseous involvement were 3 (4%) for each site. Localised disease (LD) at presentation was found in 63 (85%) patients and metastatic disease (MD) in 11 (15%). The commonest site of metastasis was lungs in 7/11 (64%). The median duration of follow-up was 1.94 years. Eighteen patients underwent primary definitive surgery (PDS) i.e. surgery without any prior chemotherapy. Besides 51 patients received NAC which was cisplatin and doxorubicin based. HDMTX was part of chemotherapy in 20(39%) of these patients. In all 66 patients underwent definitive surgery (PDS=18 NAC =48). Three patients opted out of surgery after NAC. Further 61 patients received AC. This consisted of cisplatin and doxorubicin in 24(39%) cisplatin doxorubicin and HD

MTX in 28(46%) and ifosfamide-based regimen in 9(15%) patients .Of the 66 patients undergoing definitive surgery 59(89%) had amputation. Seven limb salvage operations were in the NAC group. Good histopathological response (greater than 90% tumour necrosis) rate in HDMTX containing regimens was 7/20(35%) and non-HDMTX regimens was 11/31(35.4%) with an overall good response rate I 18/51(35%) (Table-1).

Thirty-four (46%) patients are alive to date (28 [82%] without and 6 [18%] with disease).

Overall survival for all the 74 patients at 2 years 3years and 5 years was71% 54% and 35% respectively. Median survival was 3.2 years (95% CI: 2.4 - 4).

For patients with LD at presentation median EFS was 1.6 years (95% CI: 0.74-2.3) and median OS was 6.9 years (95% CI: 2.6-11.3). Three year and five-year EFS was 30% and 25% and OS was 71% and 50%respectively (Figure-1). 0.66 year and median OS was 1.47 years (95% CI: 0.0-3.4). Three-year OS was 45%(Figure 2).

Median OS for patients receiving HDMTX-containing versus non-HDMTX regimens was 1.7 years versus 2.9 years.

Overall 38 (51%) patients relapsed with lung as the commonest site of relapse 27(71%). Twelve out of 27(44%) patients with lung-only metastases underwent successful metastasectomy. Median OS for patients who underwent pulmonary metastatectomy was 3.2 years (95% CI: 2-4.5) compared to 2.3 years (95% CI: 2-2.5) for patients who did not undergo pulmonary resection. The OS at 2 years and 5 years was 70% and 53%for the pulmonary metastatectomy patients and 65% and 25% respectively for those who did not undergo metastatectomy.

Discussion

In our study of adult osteosarcoma we found majority patients to be in their third decade of life. Only 7 patients presented above 40 years of age and none of them was more than 60 years. We were unable to find the later peak of incidence similar to the epidemiological data from another institute from our country.10 However the age and male preponderance correlates with world incidence rates.11 Most common site of initial disease was lower end of femur and upper end of tibia. Together this accounted for 79.6% of the cases. Published data also shows propensity of osteosarcoma to involve femur and tibia. The earlier age incidence peak and involvement of long- bone epiphysis of lower limbs support the hypothesis that osteosarcoma develops in the growing bone and also supports the role of hormonal changes during adolescence. Majority of our study patients presented with localised disease. Synchronous pulmonary metastasis constituted 64% of all the metastatic cases at presentation.

This is similar to the frequency of metastasis reported in other studies.1213

One-third of the patients underwent PDS which consisted of limb amputations in all cases. This was due to either large ugly looking tumours or unbearably symptomatic disease (pain bleeding or resistant infection). Patients who underwent NAC received cisplatin and doxorubicin with 39% also receiving HDMTX. An overall good histopathological response rate was seen in 35% patients with similar response amongst the HDMTX and non- HDMTX regimen. The median overall survival for patients receiving HDMTX vs non-HDMTX chemotherapy also did not differ significantly in our study population showing no supremacy of HDMTX regimens which is in accordance with the randomised trials in literature.1415 Many studies albiet non-randomised have however shown a positive co-relationship between serum levels of methotrexate tumour response and outcome.1617 The response rate not being translated to survival advantage can be multifactorial in our study of adult patients; like difference in tumour biology and

MTX pharmacokinetics. To date a reasonable and appropriate standard of care chemotherapy regimen for newly diagnosed patients with resectable osteosarcoma outside of clinical trials should be HDMTX doxorubicin and cisplatin while we await the largest randomised on-going chemotherapy and outcome analysis trial EURAMOS-1 results.

The definitive surgeries in our study mostly consisted of limb disarticulation and limb amputations and less limb conservation. The reason was possible due to consistency in chemotherapy regimens and the expected response or possibly the large size of tumours. More than half of the patients relapsed with lung being the primary site. Successful pulmonary metastatectomies were carried out in 44% patients. Numerous studies have shown clear benefit of pulmonary metastatectomes performed aggressively and repetitively.15 We found that patients who underwent pulmonary metastatectomy had a better median overall survival. The 3-year survival for patients who did not undergo pulmonary resection was halved. The metastatectomy survival rates in our patients compare well with results from other parts of the world with 2-year and 5-year OS 70% and 30-35%.1318

We found that overall survival for all the patients in our study at 5years was 35%. This is lower than the survival rates from the developed world but correlates with data from developing countries.1119 The 5-year survival rates reported from North America Europe and Japan for paediatric population fall between 55-75%. Aljubran et al. reported 5-year survival of 66% in the adult population.12

The reason for low numbers in our study could be a consequence of late presentation advanced disease limited access to early diagnosis and appropriate treatment. Also poor tolerability of aggressive therapeutic approach may have contributed. The survival rates for patients with localised disease though were better than rates for metastatic disease but are lower than reported in literature.1112

The median OS for MD patients was 1.5 years (95% CI: 0.0- 3.4). Our 3-year and 5-year survival results for MD at initial presentation were comparable with the published results of previous larger series.20 Among the MD patients 64% had lung metastasis. The intended treatment included aggressive surgery combined with multi-agent chemotherapy. The amount of evidence-based information about adult patients is limited especially from our part of the world. The reason that many patients opted out of treatment was due to the social stigma attached to limb amputation or disarticulation poor rehabilitation services limited access to multi-modality treatment and patients were unable to tolerate aggressive chemotherapy regimens.

Conclusion

Adult osteosarcoma treated with cisplatin/doxorubicin- based chemotherapy and surgery has good outcomes. The role of HDMTX in adult osteosarcoma remains uncertain. Survival rates for localised osteosarcoma in our population were comparable with results from developing countries. In our experience a vast majority of patients declined treatment due to fear of limb amputation. Pulmonary metastatectomy improved long- term survival.

References

1. Lisa Mirabello Rebecca J. Troisi and Sharon A. Savage. Osteosarcoma incidence and survival rates from 1973 to 2004:Data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End ResultsProgram. Cancer 2009; 115: 1531- 43.

2. Hang T Ta Crispin RD Choong PE Dunstan DE. Osteosarcoma treatment: state of the art. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2009; 28: 247-63.

3. Bacci G Bertoni F Longhi A Ferrari S Forni C BiaginiRetal.Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade central osteosarcoma of the extremity. Histologic response to preoperative chemotherapy correlates with histologic subtype of the tumor. Cancer 2003; 97: 3068-75.

4. Bielack SS BeateKempf-Bielack GunterDelling Ulrich Exner G Flege SHelmke K et al. Prognostic Factors in High-Grade Osteosarcoma of theExtremities or Trunk: An Analysis of 1702 PatientsTreated on Neoadjuvant Cooperative Osteosarcoma StudyGroup Protocols. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 776-90.

5. Provisor A J Ettinger LJ Nachman JB Krailo MD Makley JT Yunis EJet al. Treatment of nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity with preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy: a report from the Children's Cancer Group.J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 176-84.

6. Smeland S MA1/4ller C Alvegard TA Wiklund T Wiebe T BjAlrk Oetal.Scandinavian Sarcoma Group Osteosarcoma Study SSG VIII: prognostic factors for outcome and the role of replacement salvage chemotherapy for poor histological responders. Eur J Cancer 2003; 39: 488 -94.

7. Ferrari S Palmerini E. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant combination chemotherapy for osteogenic sarcoma. Curr Opin Oncol 2007; 19: 341-6.

8. Bacci G Briccoli A Ferrari S Saeter G Donati D Longhi A et al . Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma of the extremities withsynchronous lung metastases: treatment with cisplatin adriamycin and high dose of methotrexate and ifosfamide. Oncol Rep 2000; 7: 339-46.

9. Briccoli A Rocca M Salone M Guzzardella GA Balladelli A Bacci G. High grade osteosarcoma of the extremities metastatic to the lung: Long-termresults in 323 patients treated combining surgery and chemotherapy 1985-2005. SurgOncol 2010; 19: 193-9.

10. Qureshi A Ahmad Z Azam M RomanaIdrees. Epidemiological Data for Common Bone Sarcomas. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev 2010; 11: 393-5. osteosarcoma incidence patterns in children andadolescents middle ages and elderly persons. Int J Cancer 2009; 125: 229 -34.

12. Aljubran AH Griffin A Pintilie M Blackstein M. Osteosarcoma in adolescents and adults: survivalanalysis with and without lung metastases. Ann Oncol 2009; 20: 1136-41.

13. Chen F Miyahara R Bando T Okubo K Watanabe K Nakayama T et al. Prognostic factors of pulmonary metastasectomy for osteosarcomas of the extremities. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 34: 1235-9.

14. Souhami RL Craft AW Van der Eijken JW Nooij M Spooner D Bramwell VH et al. Randomised trial of two regimens of chemotherapy in operable osteosarcoma: a study of the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup. Lancet 1997; 350: 911-7.

15. Bramwell VH Burgers M Sneath R Souhami R van Oosterom AT VoA"te PA et al. A comparison of two short intensive adjuvant chemotherapy regimensin operable osteosarcoma of limbs in children and young adults:the first study of the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10: 1579.

16. Saeter G AlvegArd TA Elomaa I Stenwig AE HolmstrAlm T Solheim protocol with emphasis on the effects of preoperative chemotherapy with single agent high dose methortexate: a Scandinavian Sarcoma Group study. J Clin Oncol 1991; 10: 1766-75.

17. Bacci G Ferrari S Delepine N Bertoni F Picci P Mercuri M et al. Predictive factors of histologic response to primary chemotherapy in osteosarcoma of the extremity:study of 272 patients preoperatively treated with high dose methotrexate doxorubicin and cipslatin. J ClinOncol 1998; 16: 658-63.

18. Huang YM Hou CH Hou SM Yang RS. The Metastasectomy and Timing of Pulmonary Metastases on the Outcome of Osteosarcoma Patients. Clin Med Oncol 2009; 3: 99-105.

19. Petrilli AS de Camargo B Filho VO Bruniera P Brunetto AL Jesus- Garcia R et al. Results of the Brazilian Osteosarcoma Treatment Group Studies III and IV: Prognostic Factors and Impact on Survival. J ClinOncol 2006; 24: 1161-8.

20. Kager L Zoubek A PAltschger U Kastner U Flege S Kempf-Bielack B et al. Primary Metastatic Osteosarcoma: Presentation and Outcomeof Patients Treated on Neoadjuvant Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group Protocols. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 2011-8.
COPYRIGHT 2014 Asianet-Pakistan
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2014 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Journal of Pakistan Medical Association
Geographic Code:9PAKI
Date:Oct 31, 2014
Words:2974
Previous Article:Pedestrian injuries and fatalities by patterns in reported road traffic crashes " Islamabad.
Next Article:Clinically significant Coagulase Negative Staphylococci and their antibiotic resistance pattern in a tertiary care hospital.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters