Patients' costs skyrocket, specialists' incomes soar.
CONWAY, Ark. -- Kim Little had not thought much about the tiny white spot on the side of her cheek until a physician's assistant at her dermatologist's office warned that it might be cancerous.
He took a biopsy, returning 15 minutes later to confirm the diagnosis and schedule her for an outpatient procedure at the Arkansas Skin Cancer Center in Little Rock, 30 miles away.
That was the prelude to a daylong medical odyssey several weeks later, through different private offices on the manicured campus at the Baptist Health Medical Center that involved a dermatologist, an anesthesiologist and an ophthalmologist who practices plastic surgery. It generated bills of more than $25,000.
"I felt like I was a hostage,'' said Little, a professor of history at the University of Central Arkansas, who had been told beforehand that she would need just a couple of stitches. "I didn't have any clue how much they were going to bill. I had no idea it would be so much.''
Little's seemingly minor medical problem -- she had the least dangerous form of skin cancer -- racked up big bills because it involved three doctors from specialties that are among the highest compensated in medicine, and it was done on the grounds of a hospital.
Many specialists have become particularly adept at the business of medicine by becoming more entrepreneurial, protecting their turf through aggressive lobbying by their medical societies, and most of all, increasing revenues by offering new procedures -- or doing more of lucrative ones.
It does not matter if the procedure is big or small, learned in a decade of training or a weeklong course. In fact, minor procedures typically offer the best return on investment: A cardiac surgeon can perform only a couple of bypass operations a day, but other specialists can perform a dozen procedures in that time span.
That math explains why the incomes of dermatologists, gastroenterologists and oncologists rose 50 percent or more between 1995 and 2012, even when adjusted for inflation, while those for primary care physicians rose only 10 percent and lag far behind, because insurers pay far less for traditional doctoring tasks like listening for a heart murmur or prescribing the right antibiotic.
By 2012, dermatologists -- whose incomes were more or less on par with internists in 1985 -- had become the fourth-highest earners in American medicine in some surveys, bringing in an average of $471,555, according to the Medical Group Management Association, which tracks doctors' income, though their workload is one of the lightest.
In addition, salary figures often understate physician earning power because they often do not include revenue from business activities: fees for blood or pathology tests at a lab that the doctor owns or "facility'' charges at an ambulatory surgery center where the physician is an investor, for example.
"The high earning in many fields relates mostly to how well they've managed to monetize treatment -- if you freeze off 18 lesions and bill separately for surgery for each, it can be very lucrative,'' said Dr. Steven Schroeder, a professor at the University of California and the chairman of the National Commission on Physician Payment Reform, an initiative funded in part by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Doctors' charges -- and the incentives they reflect -- are a major factor in the nation's $2.7 trillion medical bill.
Payments to doctors in the United States, who make far more than their counterparts in other developed countries, account for 20 percent of American health care expenses, second only to hospital costs.
For example, the procedure performed on Little, called Mohs surgery, involves slicing off a skin cancer in layers under local anesthesia, with microscopic pathology performed between each "stage'' until the growth has been removed. Although it offers clear advantages in certain cases, it is more expensive than simply cutting or freezing off a lesion. (Hospitals seeking to hire a staff dermatologist for Mohs surgery had to offer an average of $586,083 in 2010, even more than for a cardiac surgeon, according to Becker's Hospital Review.)
The American Academy of Dermatology agrees that the surgery is sometimes used inappropriately. Dr. Brett Coldiron, president-elect of the academy, defended skin doctors as "very cost-efficient'' specialists who deal in thousands of diagnoses and called Mohs "a wonderful tool.'' He said that his specialty was being unfairly targeted by insurers because of general frustration with medical prices.
Little left Baptist Health Medical Center with a tiny skin flap and more than two dozen stitches. For five days she said she was "hung over'' from the IV sedation that she had not wanted -- a problem because she drives 60 miles on rural Arkansas roads to her university each day.
She spent months arguing down her bills, which were finally reduced: About $1,400 for the Mohs surgeon, $765 for the anesthesiologist, $1,375 for the ophthalmological plastic surgeon, plus $1,050 in operating-room charges from the hospital.
For her follow-up, she refused to return to Baptist Health and went instead to the University of Arkansas Medical Center, where a dermatologist told her she likely had not needed such an extensive procedure. But that was hard to judge, because the records forwarded from Baptist did not include the photo that was taken of the initial lesion.
And she was outraged as she wrote checks for the nearly $3,000 she owed to the doctors under the terms of her insurance.
"It was like, 'Take out your purse, we're robbing you,' '' she said.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||Telegram & Gazette (Worcester, MA)|
|Date:||Jan 19, 2014|
|Previous Article:||Bowing to pressure, Syrian opposition to attend peace talks.|
|Next Article:||W.Va. spill latest case of coal contaminating waters in US.|