Participatory budgeting produces impressive results, under the right circumstances.
The desirable outcomes are at risk if too many other new civic initiatives compete with the introduction of the participatory budgeting process and if implementation of the process is not adequately supported by training and technical assistance for the city staff, according to the paper, which is billed as the first experimental evaluation of the participatory budgeting model. Combining reforms such as administrative, fiscal, and political decentralization together with participatory budgeting appears to diminish the potential the latter can have when implemented in already-mature decentralized local governments. Dedicating staff to the support of the process increases the likelihood of success.
According to the paper, the following pattern of citizen engagement around the budget process helps create measureable improvements in tax collection and satisfaction scores:
* The yearly cycle is initiated with a community meeting where citizens express their demands and priorities for public service delivery. These priorities are tracked through specially designed report cards.
* After processing this information, local authorities and citizen delegates generate an initial budgetary proposal, which is presented and discussed in a second community meeting. In this meeting, further discussions are conducted to ensure that citizens' priorities are reflected to an appropriate degree in the budget.
* Using the feedback obtained from both community meetings, local authorities and citizen delegates formulate a final budget that must be approved by the local council in a third community meeting or budgetary hearing.
* After budget approval, a fourth community meeting is organized to delineate the service improvement action plan associated with the approved budget.
* Citizen delegates and local authorities monitor the execution of the budget using the performance management indicators contained in the service improvement action plan and a monitoring community meeting is organized halfway through the annual budget execution.
* Another community meeting is organized at the end of the annual budget execution in order to report the progress to citizens. Then the annual cycle starts again.
The research found that annual local tax revenue collection per capita increased by $37.34 (78 percent) over the control group mean. The level of preference matching between citizens and authorities increased by 29 percent; and annual public expenditures per capita in the top priority services for citizens increased by $29.8 (177 percent), and the level of public services satisfaction index by 0.37 standard deviations over the control group zero mean.
The study, "Does Participatory Budgeting Improve Decentralized Public Service Delivery?" is available at https://publications.iadb.org.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||News & Numbers|
|Publication:||Government Finance Review|
|Date:||Dec 1, 2015|
|Previous Article:||Encouraging water-efficient growth.|
|Next Article:||GFOA Executive Board approves new best practices.|