Printer Friendly

Part D counseling called an 'unfunded mandate'.

WASHINGTON -- Physician obligation to help patients negotiate the upcoming Medicare Part D outpatient drug benefit will result in "another unfunded mandate" for Medicare providers. Ronald Castellanos, M.D., chairman of the Practicing Physicians Advisory Council said at the group's recent meeting.

Noting that patients are most likely to rely on their physicians for aid in choosing among the new drug plans, Dr. Castellanos said. "Basically what you're doing is putting the burden on physicians in their offices to really educate the Medicare recipient."

PPAC members asked the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to make educational materials as simple as possible, including information on whether beneficiaries are eligible for the low-income portion of the program.

"I really want a lot of information, very digestible," said PPAC member Geraldine O'Shea, D.O., an internist from Jackson, Calif. "Something very easy for them to understand, because I do not want to take time out of my time to do medicine with my patient to say, 'Well, let me see your tax return.'"

"We are trying to make the information available as simple as possible," said Jeffrey Kelman, M.D., medical officer for the CMS Center for Beneficiary Choices, noting that he would bring educational material to the council's next meeting.

Council member Barbara McAneny, M.D., an oncologist from Albuquerque, requested that the agency develop a computer program that would allow physicians to type in the drugs a patient is using and come up with the plan that would cover all of them.

She also proposed a draft recommendation that would require CMS to develop a reimbursement code for physician time spent on drug plan education, but it was voted down by the panel, with members saying it wasn't practical.

Walking through the benefit, Dr. Kelman said CMS is getting "much more robust formularies" from drug plans than officials had anticipated. "They're looking like commercial formularies," he said. He added that the formularies would be available on the Web site in October.

All drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration must be on the formularies, Dr. Kelman said. If a drug is not included, a beneficiary can appeal, based on medical necessity, but "preferably with a physician's help," he said.

"All medically necessary drugs that are approved by the FDA with certain exceptions ... have to be available." Off-label prescriptions will be covered, Dr. Kelman said.

In a move important to rare drug organizations, Dr. Kelman said if there is only one drug to treat a disease, it must be included in the formulary.

Part D also will ensure drugs are available for chronic conditions by "favorably risk adjusting" those diseases, Dr. Kelman said. The plans also will "overadjust" for low-income individuals and nursing homes. "We went to a lot to trouble to ensure nobody was discriminated against on the formulary or based on the Part D benefit," Dr. Kelman said. He said formularies would be compared to others in their region and to commercial plans.

Council member Laura Powers, M.D., a neurologist from Knoxville, Tenn., said she was relieved by Dr. Kelman's comments. "We were so worried that our patients with very expensive drugs were going to be eliminated from all the formularies."

Dr. Kelman urged physicians to begin moving patients to the new formularies before the benefit is effective Jan. 1, 2006. "The last thing we want is 40 million exceptions and appeals in the first week," he said. Beneficiaries can enroll in the program from Nov. 15 through May 15.

Dr. Kelman pointed out that by law, barbiturates and benzodiazepines will not be covered by the plans. He said the hope is that states will continue to pay for them for beneficiaries on both Medicaid and Medicare. Also not covered are cosmetic agents and weight-loss and weight-gain products.


Contributing Writer
COPYRIGHT 2005 International Medical News Group
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Practice Trends
Author:Bristol, Nellie
Publication:Internal Medicine News
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jul 15, 2005
Previous Article:The OxyContin wars.
Next Article:CMS is eyeing Part D performance measures.

Related Articles
Gephardt proposes 'new urban agenda' to foster growth.
Local and congressional leaders talk mandates; town hall format lets city officials vent frustration, ask for relief.
Cities keep heat on mandates: cities, leagues educate public.
Immigration reform costs will test mandate relief law.
Senators resurrect police bill of rights legislation: NLC continues opposition to unfunded mandate aspect of bills.
Cities score victory on mandatory Medicare taxes.
NCSL: Washington still shifting costs to states.
10 Years of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act: ten years after its adoption, most agree that the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act has raised awareness...
Physician Part D education efforts: an 'unfunded' mandate?
FAIR committee discusses the effects of the housing crisis.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters