Parasites in Curimata cyprinoides (Characiformes: Curimatidae) from eastern Amazon, Brazil/Parasitos em Curimata cyprinoides (Pisces, Curimatidae) da Amazonia oriental, Brasil.
Curimatidae comprises about 130 fish species that can reach up to 30 cm in length. Benthopelagic and detritivorous fish, consume organic matter, algae, debris and microorganisms associated with the bottom of lakes and rivers. Most of species form large shoals and undertake trophic and reproductive migrations. In Amazon, Curimatidae fish species are important for commercial and riverine subsistence fishing (SANTOS et al., 2006; SOARES et al., 2011). In Brazil, the extractive fishing produced 5248.1 tons of Curimata spp. only in 2011 (MPA, 2013).
Curimata cyprinoides Linnaeus, 1766 is native to South America and distributed in the Orinoco River delta and Atlantic drainage area of Guianas, lower Amazonas and Tocantins rivers (FROESE; PAULY, 2013). In the Brazilian Amazon this fish is known as "branquinha" and occur in the hydrographic basin from Igarape Fortaleza (State of Amapa), an important tributary of Amazonas river, whose estuarine coastal sector is characterized for having extensive systems-river floodplain, which constitute physical systems clogged river, drained by freshwater and connected to a water main course influenced by the high rainfall and tides from the Amazonas river.
The wetlands from eastern Amazon are widely used for refuge and food by many fish species (GAMA; HALBOTH, 2004), including C. cyprinoides. In spite of its importance in the region under analysis, the parasite fauna and parasite ecology of this host are poorly known. On gills filaments of C. cyprinoides captured from State of Rondonia (Brazil) the ergasilid Miracetyma etimaruya was identified by Malta (1993). Domingues and Boeger (2005) described Rhinoxenus guianensis, a monogenoidean from the nasal cavities of C. cyprinoides from Iracoubo in French Guiana. Therefore, C. cyprinoides has been rarely considered in studies on parasitic ecology. For few species of Curimatidae fish studies on parasite fauna have been carried out (ABDALLAH et al., 2005; AZEVEDO et al., 2011; KOHN; FERNANDES, 1987; KOHN et al., 2011; MALTA, 1993; MOLNAR et al., 1974; MORAVEC, 1998; THATCHER, 2006). However, fish parasites can also be useful as bioindicators of habitat degradation especially when sensitive species are sampled as sentinels. These bioindicators include parasites abundance, prevalence and species diversity, variables that might increase or decrease following the long-term exposure. The present investigation was conducted to evaluate the parasite fauna in a wild population of C. cyprinoides from Brazilian Amazon and the host-parasite relationship.
Material and methods
Fish and locality of collection
In September, 2011, sixty-five specimens of Curimata cyprinoides were collected in wetlands from Igarape Fortaleza basin (Figure 1), a tributary from Amazonas river in the municipality of Macapa, State of Amapa, Brazil (eastern Amazon) for parasitological analysis. All fish were collected with nets of different meshes.
Collection procedures and analyses of parasites
All fish were weighed (g) and measured for total length (cm), and then necropsied for parasitological analysis. For each specimen were examined the mouth, opercula, gills and gastrointestinal tract to parasites collection (protists and metazoans). Gills were removed and analyzed with the aid of a microscope. To quantify metazoan parasites, each viscera was dissected separately and washed in running water and all the material retained on a 154 [micro]m mesh was examined stereomicroscopically. Parasites were fixed, preserved and stained with standard techniques (EIRAS et al., 2006).
The parasitological terminology used throughout follows that described by Bush et al. (1997). Dispersion index (ID) and discrepancy index (D) were calculated using the software Quantitative Parasitology 3.0 for detecting the distribution pattern of each parasite species in the infracommunity (ROZSA et al., 2000) with prevalent species [greater than or equal to] 10%. For each individual fish, the following parasite community descriptors were calculated at the infracommunity level (BUSH et al., 1997): Brillouin index (HB) and species richness, frequency of dominance (percentage of infracommunities in which a parasite species was numerically dominant) (ROHDE et al., 1995; MAGURRAN, 2004). Such diversity indexes were calculated using the software Diversity (Pisces Conservation Ltda, UK).
The data on body weight and total length were used to determine the relative condition factor (Kn) of fish hosts (LE CREN, 1951). The Pearson coefficient (r) was used to determine possible correlations of parasites intensity with the length, weight and Kn of hosts examined (ZAR, 2010).
The pH, temperature and dissolved oxygen were determined using digital devices for each purpose.
In the study area, the mean pH was 6.6 [+ or -] 0.2, mean temperature of 28.1 [+ or -] 0.3[degrees]C and mean dissolved oxygen levels of 2.0 [+ or -] 0.4 mg [L.sup.-1]. The specimens of C. cyprinoides measured 9.4 [+ or -] 1.7 cm and 13.1 [+ or -] 6.6 g.
In C. cyprinoides were collected 154,740 parasites from five taxa, being two Protozoa species, the Ichthyophthirius multifiliis (Ciliophora) and Spironucleus sp. (Hexamitidae), monogenoideans Urocleidoides sp. (Dactylogyridae), encysted metacercarie (Digenea) and acanthocephalans Polymorphus sp. (Polymorphidae). However, there was dominance of ectoparasites on the gills, mainly I. multifiliis (Table 1). No parasite was found in the mouth and opercula of the examined hosts.
In C. cyprinoides, the component community of parasites showed low mean diversity (H = 0.004 [+ or -] 0.020) and low mean species richness (1.4 [+ or -] 0.6), with predominance of individuals parasitized by 1-2 species (Figure 2). Urocleidoides sp. and I. multifiliis showed typical aggregate distribution pattern of infection (Table 2).
There was no correlation between the abundance of Urocleioides sp. and the total length (r = -0.0099, p = 0.9374) and body weight (r = -0.0597, p= 0.6366). In contrast, the abundance of I. multifiliis showed positive correlation with Kn (Figure 3) and total length and body weight (Figure 4) of hosts.
Curimata cyprinoides was parasitized by I. multifiliis, Spironucleus sp., Urocleidoides sp., Digenea metacercariae and Polymorphus sp., typical parasites of the tropical fish species from different environments, except Spironucleus sp. However, the component community of parasites in C. cyprinoides showed dominance of Urocleidoides sp. and I. multifiliis, with low diversity due to the number of parasite species in the site, response to the water currents, opportunity of transmission and infection, and consequently the probability of host infection. Differences in species richness and diversity of parasites may also be result of host's individual responses to parasitism and transmission rates (GUIDELLI et al., 2003; S OLER-JIMENEZ; FAJER-AVILA, 2012). Therefore, the ecological context of the population dynamics of parasites is important to understand host-parasite systems. Some environmental factors have a profound effect on several fish-parasite interactions. Overall, ectoparasites differ from endoparasites as the defense mechanisms tend to be externally reduced in fish.
Overdispersion of I. multifiliis and Urocleidoides sp. was found in C. cyprinoides and it can result in host mortality. Spatial heterogeneity is a feature common to many host-parasite systems, because differences in the infectivity of parasites or the host susceptibility will result in overdispersion of parasites in fish population (GUIDELLI et al., 2003; S OLER-JIMENEZ; FAJER-AVILA, 2012). Aggregate dispersion of parasites can be attributed to different factors, such as host size, host density, and environment. The small body of I. multifiliis could also explain why these protozoans are most abundant than other metazoan ectoparasites, i.e. monogenoideans species. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms that generate the parasites distribution patterns of the individuals is the central tenet of ecology and naturally it has consequences for evolutionary dynamics.
Intestine is the primary site of infection, though hexamitids can invade other organs of the host. Spironucleus species causes systemic spironucleosis in wild freshwater fish (salmonids, cichlids, anguilids and cyprinids) and marine fish (salmonids and gadids) from North America, Asia and Europe (POYNTON et al., 2004; TANZOLA; VANOTTI, 2008; WILLIAMS et al., 2011). Hexamitids rarely have been reported in Neotropical fish (TANZOLA; VANOTTI, 2008), but the history of systemic spironucleosis in farmed salmonids is peculiar. Trophozoites of Spironucleus sp. were found only on gills of C. cyprinoides with low prevalence and mean intensity. This gill infection may be accidental, because no strong intestinal or systemic infections were observed. Prevalence and intensity of Spironucleus have been associated with host age. Cyst form facilitates the direct transmission of piscine Spironucleus spp. through the aquatic environment via fecal-oral route. However, the transmission via skin lesions as well as through the rectal route by both, cyst and trophozoite, have also been suggested (WILLIAMS et al., 2011). In South America, this piscine diplomonad was only described infecting the bile of Rhamdia quelen from Argentina (TANZOLA; VANOTTI, 2008). In this study, the genus Spironucleus was recorded for the first time in C. cyprinoides and the geographic distribution of this parasite was expanded to the eastern Amazon, in Brazil. Nevertheless, Spironucleus sp. infections have not been common in fish from Brazil. Despite the importance of these infections, studies on their epidemiology and ecology in wild fish populations are scarce.
Ichthyophthirius multifiliis is a widespread ciliate and well adapted to different environmental conditions since this parasite is nonspecific (TAVARES-DIAS et al., 2010). This parasite occurs mostly in environments with low oxygen levels as in this study. In addition, these protozoans are directly transmitted from fish to fish, thus the proximity among hosts might be very important for successful transmission. Hence, almost all farmed and wild freshwater fish are susceptible to these protozoan ectoparasites. In gills from C. cyprinoides was observed the dominance of I. multifiliis infection, because the abundance of this ciliate was directly correlated with the host fish growth. There was positive correlation between the I. multifiliis abundance and the condition factor (Kn) of the host; thus the hosts' body condition was not negatively affected. This positive correlation regarding the host growth is originated possibly from an accumulative infection, and this pattern was previously reported in others freshwater fish (OMEJI et al., 2010), once the host size is recognized as a factor influencing the parasite intensity and abundance.
Currently, 18 species of Urocleidoides Mizelle and Price, 1964 are known infecting the Neotropical freshwater fish such as Curimatidae, Characidae, Ctenoluciidae, Erythrinidae, Hypopomidae, Lebiasinidae, Poeciliidae, Anostomidae and Parodontidae. Thus, diversification of Urocleidoides spp. in the tropics is highly due to the opportunity to colonize and speciate on members from a wide number of piscine families (ROSIM et al., 2011) from South and Central America. On the other hand, only Urocleidoides curimatae (Dactylogyridae) is known infecting Curimatidae species, the wild Curimata argentea gills from Trinidad (MOLNAR et al., 1974). On gills of C. cyprinoides from Igarape Fortaleza basin the low prevalence and mean intensity of Urocleidoides sp. was similar to those reported for Hyphessobrycon copelandi from middle Negro River (TAVARES-DIAS et al., 2010). Monogenoideans on fish in natural environment often occur in lower infection level, and site specificity can facilitate mating in these low-density populations for these parasites (SOLER-JIMENEZ; FAJER-AVILA, 2012).
In this study, only one digenean metacercarie was found on the gills of C. cyprinoides. In contrast, Tavares-Dias et al. (2011) observed high parasitism by Posthodiplostomum and Herpetodiplostomum metacercariae on gills of Astronotus ocellatus from a lake in eastern Amazon. High metacercariae infections were also reported on stomach, intestine, fins, gills and skin of Cichlasoma urophthalmus (JIMENEZ-GARCIA; VIDAL-MARTINEZ, 2005), as well as on gills, muscles, intestine and fins from cyprinids fish (SAENPHET et al., 2008). Therefore, digeneans are usually parasites of intestine, but have also adopted new sites of infection in hosts such as fish gills. However, infection dynamics by digeneans can vary according to the environment and host behavior (JIMENEZ-GARCIA; VIDAL-MARTINEZ, 2005; TAVARES-DIAS et al., 2011), because it can be related to water temperature, geographical latitude, longevity and particularly, the hosts' feeding habit.
Most endohelminthes trophically transmitted, such as acanthocephalans, are associated with a particular niche and host diet (TAKEMOTO et al., 2009; THATCHER, 2006). Thus, factors controlling host specificity of these fish parasites such as hosts habit and habitat are primarily ecological. Crustaceans represent possible intermediate hosts of Polymorphus species that may infect fish paratenic hosts in their complex life cycle (AMIN et al., 2010). In Brazilian freshwater fish (i.e. Astronotus ocellatus, Geophagus brasiliensis and Oligosarcus hepsetus), species of Polymorphus have not been described (SANTOS et al., 2008), because the adult forms are found in birds. For C. cyprinoides from Igarape, Fortaleza State basin, only one Polymorphus sp. was found and this infection was accidental. Oligosarcus hepsetus, a paratenic host of the same acanthocephan genus, was reported with higher prevalence (10.0%) and intensity (1-10 parasites per host) (ABDALLAH et al., 2004). This study extends the occurrence of the genus Polymorphus to a new freshwater host, C. cyprinoides, and enlarged the geographic distribution of this parasite for Brazilian Amazon.
This study showed a quantitative analysis of parasitism in C. cyprinoides, which had low species richness. As the fish size can be a factor determining the parasite species richness, larger host species may harbor more parasites; thus this low species richness in C. cyprinoides could be due to the hosts small size, besides its inferior level in the food chain, and another factors. Hosts with higher parasitic intensity levels can be more easily prey to fish-eating fish; therefore, rarely these fish can be collected of a wild population. The parasites community of C. cyprinoides was dominated by I. multifiliis and Urocleidoides sp., both typical parasites of poor-condition environments as the Igarape Fortaleza basin, which are suffering from a strong eutrophication impact of human actions. Thus, further studies might concentrate in this impact that may be affecting the parasites diversity and infection levels in this fish.
The present work was developed according to the principles adopted by the Brazilian College of Animal Experiments (COBEA) and under the authorization from ICMBio (# 23276-1). Marcos Tavares-Dias was supported by a Research fellowship from the Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Tecnologico (CNPq, Brazil).
ABDALLAH, V. D.; AZEVEDO, R. K.; LUQUE, J. L. Metazoarios parasitos dos lambaris Astyanax bimaculatus (Linnaeus, 1758), A. parahybae Eigenmann, 1908 e Oligosarcus hepsetus (Cuvier, 1829) (Osteichthyes: Characidae), do Rio Guandu, estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinaria, v. 13, n. 2, p. 57-63, 2004.
ABDALLAH, V. D.; AZEVEDO, R. K.; LUQUE, J. L. Ecologia da comunidade de metazoarios parasitos do sairu Cyphocharax gilbert (Quoy e Gaimard,1824) (Characiformes: Curimatidae) do Rio Guandu, Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinaria, v. 14, n. 4, p. 154-159, 2005.
AMIN, O. M.; HECKMANN, R. A.; PENA, C.; CASTRO, T. On the larval stages of Polymorphus spindlatus (Acanthocephala: Polymorphidae) from a new fish host, Oreochromis niloticus, in Peru. Neotropical Helminthology, v. 4, n. 1, p. 81-85, 2010.
AZEVEDO, R. K.; ABDALLAH, V. D.; LUQUE, J. L. Biodiversity of fish parasites from Guandu river, Southeastern Brazil: an ecological approach. Neotropical Helminthology, v. 5, n. 2, p. 185-199, 2011.
BUSH, A. O.; LAFFERTY, K. D.; LOTZ, J. M.; SHOSTAK, W. Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: MARGOLIS et al. (Ed.). Revisited. The Journal of Parasitology, v. 83, n. 4, p. 575-583, 1997.
DOMINGUES, M. V.; BOEGER, W. A. Neotropical Monogenoidea. 47. Phylogeny and coevolution of species of Rhinoxenus (Platyhelminthes, Monogenoidea, Dactylogyridae) and their Characiformes hosts (Teleostei, Ostariophysi) with description of four new species. Zoosystema, v. 27, n. 3, p. 441-467, 2005.
EIRAS, J. C.; TAKEMOTO, R. M.; PAVANELLI, G. C. Metodos de estudo e tecnicas laboratoriais em parasitologia de peixes. 2. ed. Maringa: Eduem, 2006.
FROESE, R.; PAULY, D. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. Available from: <HTTP://www.fishbase. org>. Access on: April 20, 2013.
GAMA, C. S.; HALBOTH, D. A. Ictiofauna das ressacas das bacias do Igarape da Fortaleza e do rio Curiau. In: TAKIYAMA, L. R.; SILVA, A. Q. (Org.). Diagnostico de ressacas do estado do Amapa: bacias do Igarape da Fortaleza e do Curiau. Macapa: GEA/SETEC/IEPA, 2004. p. 33-66.
GUIDELLI, G. M.; ISAAC, A.; TAKEMOTO, R. M.; PAVANELLI, G. C. Endoparasite infracommunities of Hemisorubim platyrhynchos (Valenciennes, 1840) (Pisces: Pimelodidae) of the Baia river, upper Parana river floodplain, Brazil: specific composition and ecological aspects. Brazilian Journal of Biology, v. 63, n. 2, p. 261-268, 2003.
JIMENEZ-GARCIA M. I.; VIDAL-MARTINEZ, V. M. Temporal variation in the infection dynamics and maturation cycle of Oligogonotylus manteri (Digenea) in the cichlid fish, Cichlasoma urophthalmus, from Yucatan, Mexico. The Journal of Parasitology, v. 91, n. 5, p. 1008-1014, 2005.
KOHN, A.; FERNANDES, B. Estudo comparativo dos helmintos parasitos de peixes do rio Mogi Guassu, coletados nas excursoes realizadas entre 1927 e 1985. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, v. 82, n. 4, p. 483-50, 1987.
KOHN, A.; MORAVEC, F.; COHEN,S. C.; CANZI, C.; TAKEMOTO, R. M.; FERNANDES, B. M. M. Helminths of freshwater fishes in the reservoir of the hydroelectric power station of Itaipu, Parana, Brazil. Check List, v. 7, n. 5, p. 681-690, 2011.
LE-CREN, E. D. The length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonadal weight and condition in the perch (Perca fluviatilis). Journal of Animal Ecology, v. 20, n. 1, p. 201-219, 1951.
MAGURRAN, A. E. Measuring biological diversity. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2004.
MALTA, J. C. O. Miracetyma etimaruya gen. et. sp. n. (Copepoda, Poecilostomatoida, Ergasilidae) from freshwater fishes of the brazilian Amazon. Acta Amazonica, v. 23, n. 1, p. 49-57, 1993.
MPA-Ministerio da Pesca e Aquicultura. Boletim estatistico da pesca e aquicultura. Brasil 2011. Brasilia: MPA, 2013.
MOLNAR, K.; HANEK, G.; FERNARDO, C. H. Ancyrocephalids (Monogenea) from freshwater fishes of Trinidad. The Journal of Parasitology, v. 60, n. 6, p. 914-920, 1974.
MORAVEC, F. Nematodes of freshwater fishes of the Neotropical region. Praha: Vydala Academia, 1998.
OMEJI, S.; SOLOMON, S. G.; OBANDE, R. A. A Comparative study of the common protozoan parasites of Heterobranchus longifilis from the wild and cultured environments in Benue state. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, v. 9, n. 9, p. 865-872, 2010.
POYNTON, S. L.; FARD, M. R. S.; JENKINS, J.; FERGUSON, J. H. Ultrastructure of Spironucleus salmonis n. comb. (formerly Octomitus salmonis sensu Moore 1922, Davis 1926, and Hexamita salmonis sensu Ferguson 1979), with a guide to Spironucleus species. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, v. 60, n. 1, p. 49-64, 2004.
ROHDE, K.; HAYWARD, C.; EAP, M. Aspects of the ecology of metazoan ectoparasites of marine fishes. International Journal of Parasitology, v. 25, n. 8, p. 45-970, 1995.
ROSIM, D. F.; MENDOZA-FRANCO, E. F.; LUQUE, J. L. New and previously described species of Urocleidoides (Monogenoidea: Dactylogyridae) infecting the gills and nasal cavities of Hoplias malabaricus (Characiformes: Erythrinidae) from Brazil. The Journal of Parasitology, v. 97, n. 3, p. 406-417, 2011.
ROZSA, L.; REICZIGEL, J. MAJOROS, G. Quantifying parasites in samples of hosts. The Journal of Parasitology, v. 86, n. 2, p. 228-232, 2000.
SAENPHET, S.; WONGSAWAD, C.; SAENPHET, K.; ROJANAPAIBUL, A.; VANITTANAKOM, P.; CHAI, J. Y. The occurrence of heterophyid metacercariae in cyprinoid fish in Chiang Mai province. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, v. 39, n. 1, p. 56-61, 2008.
SANTOS, G. M.; FERREIRA, E. J. G.; ZUANON, J. A. S. Peixes comerciais de Manaus. Manaus: Ibama/AM, ProVarzea, 2006.
SANTOS, C. P.; GIBSON, D. I.; TAVARES, L. E. R.; LUQUE, J. L. Checklist of Acanthocephala associated with the fishes of Brazil. Zootaxa, v. 1938, p. 1-22, 2008.
SOARES, M. G. M.; COSTA, E. L.; SIQUEIRA-SOUZA, F. K.; ANJOS, H. D. B.; YAMAMOTO, K. C.; FREITAS, C. E. C. Peixes de lagos do medio rio Solimoes. 2.' ed. Manaus: Reggo Edicoes, 2011.
SOLER-JIMENEZ, L. C.; FAJER-AVILA, E. J. The microecology of dactylogyrids (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae) on the gills of wild spotted rose snapper Lutjanus guttatus (Lutjanidae) from Mazatlan bay, Mexico. Folia Parasitologica, v. 59, n. 1, p. 53-58, 2012.
TAKEMOTO, R. M.; PAVANELLI, G. C.; LIZAMA, M. A. P.; LACERDA, A. C. F.; YAMADA, F. H.; MOREIRA, L. H. A.; CESCHINI, T. L.; BELLAY, S. Diversity of parasites of fish from the upper Parana river floodplain, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology, v. 69, n. 2, p. 691-705, 2009.
TANZOLA, R. D.; VANOTTI, D. Primer registro del genero Spironucleus (Diplomonadida: Hexamitidae) em un pez Neotropical. BioScriba, v. 1, n. 1, p. 73-75, 2008.
TAVARES-DIAS, M.; LEMOS, J. R. G.; MARTINS, M. L. Parasitic fauna of eight species of ornamental freshwater fish species from the middle Negro river in the Brazilian Amazon region. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinaria, v. 19, n. 2, p. 103-107, 2010.
TAVARES-DIAS, M.; NEVES, L. R.; FERNANDES, B. M. M. First report of metacercariae (Digenea) infecting Astronotus ocellatus (Perciformes: Cichlidae) from the Amazon region, Brazil. Neotropical Helminthology, v. 5, n. 2, p. 235-240, 2011.
THATCHER, V. E. Amazon fish parasites. Sofia-Moscow: Pensoft Publishers, 2006.
WILLIAMS, C. F.; LLOYD, D.; POYNTON, S. L.; JORGENSEN, A.; MILLET, C. O. M.; CABLE, J. Spironucleus species: Economically-important fish pathogens and enigmatic single-celled eukaryotes. Journal of Aquaculture Research e Development, 2011. Availaible from: <http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/21559546.S2-002>. Access on: nov. 10, 2012.
ZAR, J. H. Biostatistical analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2010.
Received on January 26, 2013.
Accepted on June 25, 2013.
Marcos Tavares-Dias (1) *, Ligia Rigor Neves (1), Douglas Anadias Pinheiro (2), Marcos Sidney Brito Oliveira (3) and Renata das Gracas Barbosa Marinho (4)
(1) Laboratorio de Aquicultura e Pesca, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria, Rod. Juscelino Kubitschek, km 5, 2600, 68903-419, Macapa, Amapa, Brazil. (2) Programa de Pos-graduacao em Ciencias Pesqueiras nos Tropicos, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. (3) Universidade do Estado do Amapa, Macapa, Amapa, Brazil. 4Programa de Pos-graduacao em Biodiversidade Tropical, Universidade Federal do Amapa, Macapa, Amapa, Brazil. * Author for correspondence. E-mail: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
Table 1. Parasites in Curimata cyprinoides from Igarape Fortaleza basin (eastern Amazon), Northern Brazil. Parameters I. multifiliis Spironucleus sp. Examined fish 65 65 Parasitized fish 64 6 Prevalence (%) 98.4 9.2 Mean intensity 2416.8 1.3 Mean abundance 2379.6 0.12 Dominance (%) 99.9 0.005 Range of intensity 174-11,285 1-3 Total number of 154,672 8 parasites Site of infection Gills Gills Parameters Urocleidoides Digenea gen. Polymorphus sp. sp. sp. Examined fish 65 65 65 Parasitized fish 15 1 1 Prevalence (%) 23.1 1.5 1.5 Mean intensity 3.8 2.0 1.0 Mean abundance 0.9 0.03 0.01 Dominance (%) 0.04 0.002 0.0007 Range of intensity 1-20 - - Total number of 57 2 1 parasites Site of infection Gills Gills Intestine Table 2. Dispersion index, d statistic and discrepancy index for main parasite species in Curimata cyprinoides from Igarape Fortaleza basin (eastern Amazon), Northern Brazil. Parameters I. multifiliis Urocleidoides sp. Dispersion index 3.110 2.102 d statistic 137.4 124.4 Discrepancy index 0.324 0.826 Figure 2. Parasite species richness in Curimata cyprinoides from Igarape Fortaleza basin (eastern Amazon), Northern Brazil. 0 1 1 38 2 24 3 2 Species richness Note: Table made from bar graph.