Paper problem: cash is passe. But digital money makes you easier to track.
One great challenge facing society is where to draw the line between an individual's right to privacy and the government's right to tax, regulate, and enforce the law. Few areas illustrate this problem as well as the way we spend our money.
Our transactions are increasingly digital (and thus easily tracked), and in places like China many companies are adopting biometrics (like fingerprints or eye scans) to verify who we are (see "10 Breakthrough Technologies: Paying with Your Face," page 72). In India, the government has taken biometrie data from 1.1 billion people. But these developments alone don't give us a good answer to the question of what we should do with good old-fashioned paper currency.
The demand for cash has dwindled in the legal, tax-compliant economy, but the underground economy uses it as much as ever. Incredibly, given that 95 percent of Americans report that they've never held a $100 bill (the rest say they hold one occasionally), there are 34 $100 bills floating around for every man, woman, and child in the country. Similar figures hold for big bills in other advanced economies. What are they being used for? The evidence seems clear: a huge amount of the world's cash supply is used to facilitate tax evasion, crime, and corruption.
Given that, going to a completely cashless society might appear to be a great idea. But it's not so simple. Ordinary people rely on cash to protect their privacy, and cash still comes in handy during prolonged power outages. One way to deal with the problem might be to phase out large-denomination notes such as the U.S. $100 bill, the 500-euro note, and the 1,000 Swiss franc note--anything worth $50 or more. (Although I wouldn't suggest following the example of India, which recently phased out 85 percent of its currency supply almost overnight. This move had disastrous effects that could have been avoided if the change had been made more gradually, over a period of years.)
We shouldn't get rid of cash entirely. Even with the rapid evolution of new technologies such as Bitcoin, paper currency provides ordinary citizens with a critical safety valve. The government's objective in regulating new or old transaction technologies should be to discourage wholesale tax evasion and crime while leaving ordinary people a margin of privacy and convenience in their ordinary lives. Putting the economy on a cash diet is a good idea. Literally going cashless is not.
Kenneth Rogoff is a professor of economics at Harvard University and the author of The Curse of Cash.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Comment:||Paper problem: cash is passe. But digital money makes you easier to track.(CURRENCY)|
|Publication:||MIT Technology Review|
|Date:||Mar 1, 2017|
|Previous Article:||Playtime's over: getting computers to beat humans at games is impressive. But now the real work begins.|
|Next Article:||One man's quest to hack his own genes: when Brian Hanley set out to test a gene therapy, he started with himself.|