Printer Friendly

Palliation for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: surgical or non-operative bypass?--A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Cholangiocarcinoma is an uncommon malignancy with an incidence of 2.3per lakh population. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma accounts for up to 80% of these tumors and the overall prognosis is poor with a mean survival of 21 months. Majority of these cases present with locally advanced irresectable disease. They suffer from progressive jaundice, pruritis, recurrent cholangitis leading to septicemia or liver failure and death ensues. They require palliative biliary decompression, either surgical or endoscopic, to relieve their symptoms. Aim of palliation is to optimize the quality and quantity of remaining life with minimal morbidity and mortality.

CASE REPORT: A 48 year old female presented with progressive jaundice, cholangitis and troublesome pruritis of 1 month duration. Her LFT report was Total bilirubin -19.6 mg/dl with direct 16.4mg/dl & indirect 3.2 mg/dl, SGOT-200 IU/L, SGPT-376 IU/L,ALP-299 IU/L.CECT abdomen showed dilated CBD of 9mm diameter, moderate IHBD, cholelithiasis, hypodense area at confluence suspicious of malignant stricture. ERCP showed dilated left and right hepatic ducts with stricture below confluence across which a 10 Fr x 10cm straight Tannenbaum plastic stent was placed. Post stenting bilirubin decreased to 8 mg/dl. Patient returned with deepening jaundice and cholangitis 40 days after stenting. She was subjected to endoscopic stent change and a10Frx10cm percuflex biliary stent was placed, which again got obstructed after 30 days.

Because of the very short duration of stent patency a more durable left hepaticojejunostomy was planned. Pre-operative investigations showed Serum total bilirubin-19.6mg/dl, direct bilirubin 13.3mg/dl, indirect 6.3mg/dl, alkaline phosphatase-333IU/L, serum proteins -6.7gm and A/G ratio 0.8.MRCP showed Left hepatic duct -8mm and Right hepatic duct-7mm diameter.(Fig 1& 2)

Under general anaesthesia access was gained through a right subcoastal incision. Laparotomy findings were a grossly distended gall bladder with its neck and cystic duct encased in dense fibrosis and plastered posteriorly. Thick hard stricture palpable for 2 cm length involving common hepatic duct (CHD) and confluence--Type II Bismuth tumor(fig.3 &4).Left hepatic duct was isolated, it was 9mm in diameter and1.2 cm in length. A Roux loop was fashioned from proximal jejunum and a Roux-en-y-left hepaticojejunostomy was done (fig. 5). Post-operative recovery was good, serum bilirubin level dropped to 1.4mg/dl at the time of discharge on the [8.sup.th] postoperative day. Patient was followed up for 9 months period during which the serum bilirubin level remained less than 1.5 mg/dl & pruritis relieved. Thus the patient had a longer symptom free interval of 9 months after surgery compared to only 40 days after endoscopic stenting.

DISCUSSION: To relieve hyperbilirubinemia, 30-50% of functioning liver needs to be drained. This can be achieved by surgical or percutaneous or endoscopic biliary drainage procedures. Non- operative decompressions are indicated in patients with poor surgical risks and in patients with life expectancy less than 6 months due to extensive disease or multiple metastasis. In patients other than these, surgical biliary bypass offers more durable palliation.

Endoscopic retrograde biliary decompression can be achieved using plastic or metal stents. Plastic stents of 10-12 Fr diameter have an average duration of patency of 3-4 months. Their advantage is low cost, simple insertion and easy removal but the disadvantage is ease of clogging requiring frequent stent changing every 2-4 months. Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) have large internal diameter of 30 Fr, patency duration of 10 months and allow drainage of secondary branches through open side mesh of stent. Their disadvantage is high price and chance of tumor ingrowth into stent lumen with uncovered SEMS.

Surgical palliation is by enteric anastomosis to the extrahepatic or selected intrahepatic segmental ducts, mainly segment III. These include Roux-en-y- left hepaticojejunostomy, segment III cholangiojejunostomy and right sided hepaticojejunostomy. Left hepaticojejunostomy is easier of the three. The left hepatic duct (LHD) is extrahepatic in its course and has a mean length of 1.3 cm. It runs transversely at the base of segment IV and can be exposed by retracting segment IV cranially. To gain access to LHD,a plane between Glissons capsule and the peritoneal extension encasing the portal triad at the base of segment IV requires division. The duct is incised longitudinally for the length exposed,a retrocolic Roux limb is fashioned from proximal jejunum and a side-side,single layer, interrupted, mucosal to mucosal anastomosis is performed using 4.0 monofilament suture material.

CONCLUSION: Majority of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma will require a palliative approach. In those with a life expectancy of less than six months and those unfit for surgery non-surgical stenting is a preferred treatment, but patients other than these are likely to achieve better quality palliation with surgery, which can be performed with similar mortality & morbidity to non-operative techniques.

DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2015/242

BIBLIOGRAPHY:

1. Schwartz's principles of surgery, [8.sup.th] edition, The Mc Graw-Hill Companies, 2005.

2. Blumgart L.H. Surgery of the Liver, Biliary tract & Pancreas, [4.sup.th] edition, Saunders Elseiver, 2007.

3. Nordback IH, Pitt HA, Coleman J, Venbrux AC, et al. unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: percutaneous vs operative palliation.Surgery.1994; 115: 597-603[pubMed].

4. Kuvshin off BW, Armstrong JG,Fong Y,et al.palliation of irresectable cholangiocarcinoma.Br J Surg. 1995.

5. Bismuth H, Malt RA, Carcinoma of biliary tree. N Engl J Med. 1979.

6. Li HM, Dou KF, Sun K, et al. Palliative surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dist. Int. 2003.

7. Boris R. A. Belchacz, Gregory J. Gores: Cholangiocarcinoma, Clinics in liver disease, Elseiver Saunders, 2005.

8. Renshaw K. Malignant neoplasm of extrahepatic biliary ducts Ann Surg 1992; 76: 205-21.

AUTHORS:

[1.] Reddi Hemanthi

[2.] Pindi S. Sitaram

PARTICULARS OF CONTRIBUTORS:

[1.] Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Rangaraya Medical College, Kakinada.

[2.] Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Rangaraya Medical College, Kakinada.

NAME ADDRESS EMAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:

Dr. R. Hemanthi, Vennela ENT Hospital, Kakinada-533003. E-mail: reddihemanthi@gmail.com

Date of Submission: 09/01/2015.

Date of Peer Review: 10/01/2015.

Date of Acceptance: 22/01/2015.

Date of Publishing: 02/02/2015.
COPYRIGHT 2015 Akshantala Enterprises Private Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 
Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:CASE REPORT
Author:Hemanthi, Reddi; Sitaram, Pindi S.
Publication:Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences
Article Type:Clinical report
Date:Feb 2, 2015
Words:1014
Previous Article:Comparative study of extra amniotic foleys catheter and intracervical [PGE.sub.2] gel for pre-labour cervical ripening.
Next Article:A rare case of papillary carcinoma of thyroid with hyperthyroidism.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters