Krug provided the government with information relating to the alleged underpayment of taxes by certain third-party taxpayers. Using this information, the IRS recovered millions of dollars in unpaid taxes. To collect his reward, Krug submitted Form 211, Application for Reward for Original Information. The IRS denied his claim because there was no written contract.
Krug sued the government, arguing that IRC section 7623--read in conjunction with IRS Publication no. 733--created an "implied-in-fact" contract entitling him to a reward. The government argued that it has broad discretion in issuing, or refusing to issue, rewards to informants.
The court sided with the government. In its view, the IRS has the authority to deny a reward claim as long as its reasons for rejecting the claim are not irrational.
Observation. CPAs should advise their clients who provide information that helps convict someone of a tax law violation that the only way to bind the government is by negotiating and signing a written contract that fixes a specific reward amount.
--Michael Lynch, CPA, Esq., associate professor of tax accounting at Bryant College, Smithfield, Rhode Island.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||IRS rewards|
|Publication:||Journal of Accountancy|
|Article Type:||Brief Article|
|Date:||Sep 1, 1998|
|Previous Article:||IRS Restructuring Act includes CPA/client privilege.|
|Next Article:||Travel and tour activities of tax-exempt organizations.|