Printer Friendly

Paediatric triage in South Africa.

'In the five minutes taken to read this page 70 children will die.' So opens the World Health Organization (WHO)'s Countdown to 2015, the 2012 Report.'11 We know that early identification and prioritisation of sick children (triage) in health facilities can reduce child mortality. [2] There has been a lot of interest and work in the field of triage of sick children in South Africa (SA) over the past few years. Despite this, many parts of SA use no formal system for triage of children in acute and emergency settings. This article aims to explain some of the key triage tools being considered and developed in SA, how they evolved and their relevance to the country.

The word 'triage' comes from the French verb trier, meaning to pick or sort. It first appeared in the English language in the 18th century to describe the grading of sheep fleeces. Napoleon's surgeon-in-chief introduced the practice of assigning acuity levels to military casualties in the early 19th century, but the word 'triage' to describe this practice only came into medical usage in the 1930s. [3]

Emergency triage is a process of rapidly sorting patients into groups based on the urgency of their condition. There are many different triage systems around the world. Most commonly, triage is based on some combination of presenting complaint, clinical discriminators, factors from the history and/or physiological variables (such as vital signs). [4]

Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI)

The case management component of the WHO Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) is an algorithmic approach for health workers in developing countries that has proven benefits for the care of sick children. It has been adopted for primary healthcare (PHC) settings in SA since 1997. [5] While containing assessment tools that should enable the practitioner to identify the sickest children, it has only a rudimentary triage element. Children are seen in order of arrival with no formal rapid evaluation of new waiting patients to identify any who may be sicker. Once the child reaches the front of the queue, an initial check for 'general danger signs' is done (a form of triage), but even in their presence the clinician is instructed to 'complete the assessment' before initiating therapy, unless the child is lethargic or unconscious.

Further assessment is based on symptoms rather than acuity. A study evaluating the quality of IMCI assessments in SA found that only 12% of health workers checked every child for danger signs, and only 52 (46.4%) of 112 children assessed as having a danger sign or a severe classification by the IMCI expert were also classified as severe by the health worker. [5] While very valuable as a clinical tool in PHC settings, IMCI therefore contains an incomplete and potentially delayed rapid evaluation for common life-threatening problems.

In PHC systems without IMCI, triage is likely to be even weaker in the absence of a formal system such as those we now describe, leading to delays in emergency care of critically ill children.

Paediatric triage systems in SA

Emergency Triage Assessment and Treatment (ETAT)

It is estimated that about 10-20% of children presenting to PHC will need to be referred to the next level hospital[6]-and these are likely to be the sickest children. In recognition of the fact that emergency care for children at referral hospitals in the developing world is often substandard,[7] the WHO developed the Emergency Triage Assessment and Treatment (ETAT) guidelines in Malawi. [8] The ETAT guidelines are specifically intended for use at hospital level and form chapter 1 of the WHO Pocket Book of Hospital Care for Children. [9] The ETAT guidelines can be divided into three main sections: an emergency triage (ET) system, a section on assessment and treatment (AT) of common paediatric emergencies, and a section on implementation of ETAT. We will focus primarily on the ET section.

The ET system of ETAT has three triage categories: emergency, priority and queue. Triage starts with a rapid clinical evaluation for any emergency signs using the airway-breathing-circulation-coma-convulsions-dehydration (ABCCCD) approach. Any child with emergency signs is taken immediately to the resuscitation room for further assessment and treatment. If there are no emergency signs, the triage nurse checks for priority signs, which are summarised in the mnemonic '3TPRMOB' (Fig. 1). If any of these signs are present, the child is brought to the front of the queue. If no emergency or priority signs are found, the child is labelled a 'queue' (non-urgent) patient and must wait in line to see the clinician.

The generic WHO ETAT course has seven modules and is run either as a 3 1/2-day course or as separate modules. The ETAT guidelines were field-tested in several countries including Angola, Brazil, Cambodia, Indonesia, Kenya and Niger, and have subsequently been rolled out in many low-income countries.

Emergency Triage Assessment and Treatment--South Africa (ETAT-SA)

In 2009, when the National Department of Heath wished to pilot the ETAT guidelines in SA, a group was formed to convene a course. However, it became clear that the 'assessment and treatment' (AT) part of the generic ETAT guidelines was too elementary at hospital level in the SA setting. Consequently, a team of SA child health experts including two of the authors (BC and CS) undertook the process of adapting the ETAT manual and training materials for use in SA. The resulting version of ETAT is called 'ETAT-SA' and is available from

Only minor changes were made to the 'emergency triage' (ET) system, including the option of checking oxygen saturation if a monitor is available (emergency if <92%), defining a 'tiny infant' as less than 3 months of age, and checking the temperature in any child who felt hot (fever defined as >38[degrees]C).

The ETAT-SA course also has seven modules, and it can be run as a 3-day course or be taught as separate half-day modules. The implementation module is a very useful section and has also been adapted from the original ETAT course. Tis section helps participants to map out patient flow and resources in their current emergency area for children, and plan how to improve this using the information and skills learnt on the ETAT-SA course.

South African Triage Scale (SATS)

Te South African Triage Scale (SATS), originally known as the Cape Triage Score, was developed in 2004 and revised in 2009 by the South African Triage Group, convened under the auspices of the Division of Emergency Medicine at the University of Cape Town and Stellenbosch University. [10,11] SATS is a four-category colour-coded triage system: emergency (red), very urgent (orange), urgent (yellow) and non-urgent (green). Triage in the SATS system is based on rapid evaluation of clinical discriminators combined with an age-appropriate composite physiological score, known as the Triage Early Warning Score (TEWS). Points are given for normal versus abnormal mobility, respiratory rate, heart rate, temperature and the presence or absence of trauma (Fig. 2). There are two paediatric versions of the TEWS, one for the younger child (less than 3 years) and one for the older child (older than 3 years). If any emergency clinical signs are found at triage, no TEWS calculation is done.

The SATS tool has been validated in public and private healthcare settings in SA, as well as in the pre-hospital setting. [10] SATS has been implemented by Medecins Sans Frontieres into field hospitals around the world and is also being used in Brazil, Sweden, Poland and Ireland. SATS was adopted as the official triage tool of the Western Cape Province (WC) in 2006. All WC Metro Emergency Medical Services pre-hospital providers and all WC emergency centres use SATS.

Revised Paediatric SATS (P-SATS)

The SATS triage tool is regularly revised every 3-5 years. Paediatric colleagues in the WC were concerned that the original paediatric SATS tool was not able to identify life-threatening emergency signs as rapidly as ETAT-SA. There was also a preference for the simple 'common-sense' ETAT-SA approach to clinical signs in children. To address these concerns, the WC Department of Health convened a multidisciplinary Triage Technical Workgroup (TWG) in 2011 to undertake an extensive revision of the paediatric SATS tool. A modified Delphi consensus approach was used to adapt and incorporate the emergency triage (ET) part of ETAT-SA into SATS (M Twomey--personal communication). The resulting tool is known as the Revised Paediatric SATS tool (P-SATS)'121 (all SATS materials available at

The P-SATS retains the four colour categories of SATS but now starts with the 'ABCCCD' ETAT approach to immediate emergency sign identification. The TWG addressed each ETAT emergency sign, and many of these were revised. Examples include the addition of 'any reported apnoea' to A-B emergency signs, lethargy to shock clinical signs, and 'post-ictal not alert' to convulsion evaluation.

Each of the ETAT-SA priority signs ('3TRPMOB') and all the original SATS clinical discriminators were reviewed by the TWG. Eight of the original 12 ETAT-SA priority signs were retained and another 11 signs were added, 6 being trauma related and 5 medical. These 'priority signs' were divided between the very urgent and urgent categories using a consensus approach [12] ( sats/#chapter3). The step-by-step triage process was better defined and clarified into an easy-to-follow flowchart [12] ( za/sats/#chapter2).

A validation study of the P-SATS, conducted in 2011, included 2 014 children aged less than 13 years who were triaged at six sites in the WC. This study showed that the tool is safe and valid with a sensitivity of 91% and a negative predictive value of 95% for admission to hospital.'131 It also showed that neither clinical parameters nor vital signs alone are adequate to detect the sickest children reliably at triage. Of the 434 admissions in that study, clinical signs alone failed to identify 32%, while TEWS missed 13%.'131 Tis finding is in keeping with 'early warning score' literature which suggests that taking note of abnormal vital signs allows earlier identification of sick children. [14,15] It therefore seems prudent to maintain measurement of vital signs and calculation of a TEWS as part of the triage process wherever possible.

Paediatric South African Triage Scale Assessment and Treatment (P-SATSAT)

One of the authors (BC) has further combined the P-SATS with the 'AT' component of ETAT-SA to form the 'Paediatric South African Triage Scale Assessment and Treatment' (P-SATSAT) training course. The course has six modules (as there is no implementation module), and it is run over 2 days.

Unlike the ETAT and ETAT-SA courses, the P-SATSAT is a pass fail course. Testing consists of a multiple-choice question paper, a short-answer question paper and four objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs). The OSCE stations test participants' practical skills in: (i) triage; (ii) making 10% dextrose; (iii) drawing up and administering the correct fluid bolus for shock; and (iv) selecting and administering the correct dose of an appropriate anticonvulsant by the correct route. Each section must be passed with a 75% pass mark. Of the 26 student nurses on a pilot course, 24 (92%) passed.

Applying paediatric triage solutions in SA settings

Triage must be applied in all first-care settings in SA. Within the setting of emergency centres, the P-SATS and P-SATSAT are recommended for this function. Where large numbers of sick children are seen with very limited staff", the triage component of ETAT-SA provides a good starting point. In IMCI or single-practice settings, a partial form of triage could be implemented by employing one of the following methods. Each time the IMCI or single practitioner is ready to see the next child, all new arrivals in the queue are rapidly assessed for general danger signs. This would require no additional training and would help with earlier identification of sicker children. Alternatively, all IMCI and PHC nurses could be trained in rapid identification of life-threatening signs using a ready-made simple process such as the 'ABCCCD' approach of ETAT-SA or the 'emergency signs' of P-SATS.


Wherever children attend for PHC or emergency care in SA, a form of triage should be used to ensure that the sickest children receive treatment as quickly as possible. We have presented systems that could and should be implemented across the country's health systems, private and public. One of the formal systems should be incorporated into the package of care envisaged for children under the nascent National Health Insurance plan.

Conflict of interest. BC is a member of the 'Emergency Triage Assessment and Treatment-South Africa' (ETAT-SA) working group which has adapted the WHO generic ETAT guidelines for the SA health setting. She was also a member of the Triage Provincial Technical Workgroup, convened under the auspices of the Western Cape Department of Health, to incorporate ETAT-SA into the South African Triage Scale (SATS) in 2011. TW was a member of the Triage Provincial Technical Workgroup, convened under the auspices of the Western Cape Department of Health, to incorporate ETAT-SA into the South African Triage Scale (SATS) in 2011. CS is a member of the ETAT-SA working group which has adapted the WHO generic ETAT guidelines for the SA health setting.


[1.] The Countdown to 2015: Maternal, Newborn and Child Survival. Tracking Progress in Maternal, Newborn and Child Health: The 2012 Report. http://www. (accessed 15 November 2012).

[2.] Molyneux E, Ahmad S, Robertson A. Improved triage and emergency care for children reduces inpatient mortality in a resource-constrained setting. Bull World Health Organ 2006;84:314-319. ' BLT.04.0195051

[3.] Edwards M. Triage. Lancet 2009;373(9647):1515. ' FS0140-6736%2809%2960843-61

[4.] Patel M, Maconochie I. Triage in children. Trauma 2008;10:239-245 'http://

[5.] World Health Organization. Integrated Management of Childhood Illness. (accessed 7 May 2013).

[6.] Campbell H, Duke T, Weber M, English M, Carai S, Tamburlini G, and Pediatric Hospital Improvement Group. Global initiatives for improving hospital care for children: State of the art and future prospects. Pediatrics 2008;121:e984-e992. '

[7.] Nolan T, Angos P, Cunha AJ, et al. Quality of hospital care for seriously ill children in less-developed countries. Lancet 2001;357(9250):106-110. 'http://

[8.] World Health Organization. Emergency Triage Assessment and Treatment (ETAT). Manual for Participants. Geneva: WHO, 2005. http://whqlibdoc.who. int/publications/2005/9241546875_eng.pdf (accessed 7 May 2013).

[9.] World Health Organization. Pocket Book ofHospital Care for Children. Chapter1. Geneva: WHO, 2005. pdf (accessed 7 May 2013).

[10.] Gottschalk SB, Wood D, DeVries S, Wallis LA, Bruijns S, on behalf of the Cape Triage Group. The Cape Triage Score: A new triage system for South Africa proposal from the Cape Triage Group. Emerg Med J 2006;23:149-153. 'http://

[11.] Wallis LA, on behalf of the Cape Triage Group. Te Cape Triage Score: Update. Emerg Med J 2006;23:740. ' 1

[12.] South African Triage Scale. (accessed 7 May 2013).

[13.] Twomey M, Cheema B, Buys H, et al. Vital signs for children at triage: A multicentre validation of the Revised South African Triage Scale (SATS) for children. S Afr Med J 2013;103(5):304-308. '

[14.] Day A, Oldroyd C. Te use of early warning scores in the emergency department. J Emerg Nurs 2010;36:154-155. ' jen.2009.11.0011

[15.] Pearson G, Duncan H. Early warning systems for identifying sick children. Paediatrics and Child Health 2011;5:230-233. ' paed.2011.02.0071

B Cheema, (1) MB BS, BSc, MRCPCH (London), DTM&H (Liverpool); C Stephen, (2) MB ChB, DCH (SA); A Westwood, (3) FCP (SA), MD

(1) Division of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa

(2) Department of Paediatrics, Pietermaritzburg Hospitals Complex, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

(3) Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa

Corresponding author: B Cheema (
Fig.1. Emergency Triage Assessment and Treatment
(ETAT) priority signs ('3TPRMOB')

* Tiny infant (under 2 months)

* Temperature

* Severe Trauma

* Severe Pallor

* Poisoning

* Severe Pain

* Lethargy or irritable or Restless

* Respiratory distress

* Urgent Referral

* Severe wasting (severe Malnutrition)

* Oedema of both feet

* Major Burn

Fig. 2. Triage Early Warning Score (TEWS) calculation boxes
(RR = respiratory rate; HR = Heart rate;
AVPU = alert, voice pain, unresponsive)

        YOUNGER CHILD (<3 years) TEWS

VALUE                       3              2            1   0

        Mobility                                            Normal age
        RR(/min)            Less than 70   20-25            26-39
        HR(/min)            Less than 70   70-79            80-130
        Temp ([degrees]C)                  Feels cold       35-38.4
                                             under 35
        AVPU                                                 Alert
        Trauma                                               No
        Younger than 3 years/shorter than 95cm

        YOUNGER CHILD (<3 years) TEWS

VALUE                       1          2

        Mobility                       Unable to
                                         move as
        RR(/min)                       40-49
        HR(/min)                       131-159
        Temp ([degrees]C)              Feels hot Over 38.4

        AVPU                Reacts     Reacts to Pain
        Trauma              Yes

        Younger than 3 years/shorter than 95cm

        YOUNGER CHILD (<3 years) TEWS

VALUE                       3              SCORE
        RR(/min)            50 or more
        HR(/min)            160 or more
        Temp ([degrees]C)
        AVPU                Unresponsive
        Younger than 3 years   Total

        OLDER CHILD (> 3 years) TEWS

VALUE                            3           2      1   0

        Mobility                                        Normal
                                                          for age
        RR(/min)            Less than 15   15-16        17-21
        HR(/min)            Less than 60   60-79        80-99
        Temp ([degrees]C)                               35-38.4
        AVPU                                            Alert
        Trauma                                          No

        3-12 years old/95-150 cm tall

        OLDER CHILD (> 3 years) TEWS

VALUE                       1                2

        Mobility            22-26            Unable to
                                               walk as
        RR(/min)            100-129          27 or more
        HR(/min)                             160 or more
        Temp ([degrees]C)                    Feel hot
                                               Over 38.4
        AVPU                Reacts to Pain   Reacts to Pain


        3-12 years old/95-150 cm tall

        OLDER CHILD (> 3 years) TEWS
        Mobility            3              Score

        Temp ([degrees]C)
        AVPU                Unresponsive

        3-12 years old/95-150 cm tall    Total
COPYRIGHT 2013 South African Medical Association
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2013 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:HOT TOPICS
Author:Cheema, B.; Stephen, C.; Westwood, A.
Publication:South African Journal of Child Health
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:6SOUT
Date:May 1, 2013
Previous Article:CPD questions.
Next Article:Pre-hospital management and risk factors in children with acute diarrhoea admitted to a short-stay ward in an urban South African hospital with a...

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |