Printer Friendly

PHYTOBIOTIC ACTIVITY OF Larrea tridentata, Origanum vulgare AND Plectranthus amboinicus IN GRAM POSITIVE AND GRAM NEGATIVE BACTERIAS/ACTIVIDAD FITOBIOTICA DE Larrea tridentate, Origanum vulgare Y Plectranthus amboinicus EN BACTERIAS GRAM POSITIVAS Y GRAM NEGATIVAS/ATIVIDADE FITOBIOTICA DE Larrea tridentada, Origanum vulgare E Plectranthus amboinicus EM BACTERIAS GRAM POSITIVAS E GRAM NEGATIVAS.

Introduction

Antimicrobials have been used since 1950 as growth promoters in animal production to increase the growth rate and efficiency of food, as well as to prevent and treat bacterial diseases, to favor the growth of animals (Sen et al., 2011; Holman and Chenier, 2014). During the last decades the industrial use of these antimicrobials has resulted in an increase in the number and types of resistant microorganisms (Kalra, 1998; Kalemba and Kunicka, 2003), a process that is enhanced by the ability of certain bacteria to transfer resistance, even between different genera and species, originating different disorders in the balance of the gastrointestinal microbiota, mainly antimicrobial resistance, making therapeutic treatments difficult (Hascik et al, 2016). The presence of these antimicrobials in the tissue or by-products of the animals has also been reported, putting at risk the safety of the food destined for human consumption (Mehndiratta and Bhalla, 2014; Chavez et al., 2015). Only in the USA, more than 47 million episodes of diseases and more than 100,000 hospitalizations occur yearly due to the presence of foodborne pathogens (Scharff, 2012).

The prohibition of the use of antimicrobials as feed additives has led to and has accelerated the study of alternative antimicrobial molecules that can be used in the food of animals destined for production (Nicoletti et al, 2010). Several lines of research are trying to counteract the adverse effects of antimicrobials through less aggressive means (Ojeda, 2008). Some plants, or parts of them, contain natural antimicrobials known as phytobiotics that are mainly phenolic compounds and phyto-alexins. These types of antimicrobials are considered as a potentially safe source because they do not lead to bacterial resistance (Davis et al., 1990; Garcia et al., 2010; Rodriguez, 2011).

The extracts of these antimicrobial-containing plants are easily obtained complex products of secondary metabolites and are less aggressive to nature, as compared to the antibacterial chemicals that are currently used (Garcia et al., 2010). The results of their study cover a broad spectrum of pharmacological functions such as anti-inflammatories, antioxidants, anticancer agents, anthelmintics, antidiarrheals, antitussives, antivirals (Davis et al., 1984), biological activity and biocides, among others (Garcia et al., 2010).

Plant extracts can be isolated by various methods, such as steam distillation or Soxhlet extraction, which do not need expensive reagents or sophisticated equipment (Ianez, 2005; Moreno-Limon et al., 2011).

Larrea tridentata, locally known as 'gobernadora', is a desert shrub widely found in the deserts of Mojave in the USA (Tequida-Meneses et al., 2002) and of Sonora and Chihuahua in Mexico (Tequida-Meneses et al., 2002), and has shown to have antifungal activity (Vargas-Arispuro et al., 2005; Saldivar et al., 2006; Osorio et al., 2010) mainly against Aspergillus flavus, A. niger, Penicillium chrysogenum, P. expansum, Fusarium poae and F. moniliforme (Lira-Salvidar et al., 2003, Vargas-Arispuro et al., 2005; Osorio et al, 2010). It is the nordihidroguayaretic acid (NDGA) phenolic derivative compound that is considered has antifungal activity (Moreno-Limon et al., 2011). Some studies have reported as well a nematicidal or nematostatic effect on nine genera of nematodes, and insect repellency (Lira-Saldivar, 2003). Lira-Salvidar (2003) also mentions that more than 45 bacteria are susceptible to the resin or its constituents, and that the flavonides of the resin are active against viruses that affect RNA.

Common oregano (Origanum vulgare) has been shown to have phytobiotic activity on strains of Gram negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella tiphymurium, S. cholerae suis and Vibrio cholerae, and on Gram positive bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus cereus (Ayala et al., 2011). These effects are due to its essential oils, such as thymol, carvacrol, pinene, cymol, alpha thuyone, selinene, dipentene, and alpha terpinene (Kalra, 1998). Phenols such as thymol and carvacrol possess phytobiotic activity due to the acid nature of the hydroxyl group (Garcia et al., 2010).

The oregano 'orejon' (Plectranthus amboinicus), which belongs to the Coleus genus (Lamiacea family) and is also known as 'french' oregano in Cuba, has shown to possess antitussive, bacteriostatic (70% ethanol), antioxidant (30% ethanol) and phytobiotic activities due to its essential oils, rich in thymol and carvacrol (Menendez and Pavon, 1999; Bakkali et al, 2008).

The objective of this work was to evaluate the phytobiotic activity of leaf extracts of 'gobernadora' (L. tridentata), common oregano (O. vulgare) and oregano 'orejon' (P. amboinicus) in Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria of interest in the animal feed sector.

Materials and Methods

Study site and sample preparation

Vegetative material from 'gobernadora' (L. tridentata), common oregano (O. vulgare) and oregano 'orejon' (P. amboinicus) was collected in the greenhouse of the Universidad Auto noma de Ciudad Juarez, located at 31.746276, -106.442276. Subsequently, they were manually defoliated in the laboratory and the leaves were dried in an incubator (Thermo Fisher Scientific[R], USA) at 45[degrees]C for 48h (Kalra, 1998). Once the leaves were dehydrated, they were milled using a blender high speed (Classic model, Oster[R], USA) until a fine powder was obtained and kept in a glass container previously labeled and perfectly closed.

The powder samples (ground) of each plant were weighed using an analytical balance (A-160 model, Devender Instrument Co, USA) and extracts were prepared at 30, 35 and 40% solution in 75% ethyl alcohol. The obtained extracts were allowed to stand for 72h before its use. A total of nine treatments (three for each species) were used.

Preparation of the sensidisks

Sensidisks of 5mm diameter were obtained using filter paper (MN 615, 11cm, Machery-Nagel, Germany), with the help of a metal drill with a 1-hole clamp. They were introduced in a 100ml glass container with metal lid for sterilization at 102[degrees]C for 30min in a 25 liters autoclave (All American, USA) and then cooled for 24h at room temperature. The sensidisks were immersed in each plant extract for seven days before being placed in a Petri dish of 15cm diameter.

Bacterial strains

A total of eight reference strains were tested and cultivated in the Chemistry Department of the Universidad Autonoma de Ciudad Juarez, of which five correspond to Gram (+) strains: Streptococcus pyogenes (reference ATCC19615), Staphylococcus aureus (reference ATCC25923), Enterococcus faecalis (reference ATCC19433), Salmonella gallinarum (Klein) (reference ATCC700623) and Bacillus subtilis (reference ATCC6051); and three to Gram (-) strains: Klebsiella oxytoca (reference ATCC13182), enteric Salmonella (reference ATCC29630) and Escherichia coli (reference ATCC25922).

In vitro evaluation

Bacterial concentrations were standardized to 50 Klett units using the Klett-Summerson colorimeter. For this, 15x16mm tubes were used to add 5ml of 0.85% sterile saline, and once the bacterial concentrations were standardized, they were inoculated in the Petri dishes containing Muller Hinton agar (Merck--EMB 500g, code 1054370500). They were inoculated in triplicate of each bacterium by plant extract, for a total of 216 inoculated Petri dishes. Immediately, with the help of a clip sterilized with absolute grade ethyl alcohol and flaming, the sensidisks (previously immersed in each extract for seven days) were impregnated with the corresponding extract. Finally, the Petri dishes were placed in a bacteriological stove (Heratherm IMC18, Thermo Scientific, USA) for 24h at 37[degrees]C. After an incubation period of 72h the bacterial growth inhibition halo (BGIH) was measured with the help of a 12-inch digital vernier (Bearings, USA) according to the technique described by Bauer et al. (1966).

Statistical analysis

The response variable was the BGIH, which was analyzed using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test using SAS/ STAT version 9.3 (SAS, 2009) and comparison of means performed by the Tukey method (Mendenhall, 1994) with a=0.05% as the minimum significant difference.

Results and Discussion

In Figure 1 the halos (BGIH) formed with 35% extracts of the three plants are shown. According to the results obtained, the extracts of the three plants analyzed have phytobiotic activity. Significant differences (P<0.05) were found in the three concentration levels, the inhibition being highest when it was 35%. L. tridentata at 30% had the highest BGIH compared to extracts from P. amboinicus, followed by that from O. vulgare, also at 30%, on an enteric Salmonella strain. S. gallinarum and E. coli were inhibited to a lesser degree by extracts at 30%. Similar results in the BGIH of the extracts were observed for the different strains of Gram (+) and Gram (-) bacteria. Table I shows differences (P<0.05) in the type of extract and level of concentration of the extract (P<0.04).

The results indicate that L. tridentata has phytobiotic activity in addition to its known antifungal activity (Vargas-Arispuro et al., 2005; Lira-Saldivar et al., 2006; Osorio et al., 2010), especially against Gram-positive bacteria (Table II). The results also support what was reported by Lira-Saldivar (2003) but in the present work the phytobiotic activity was in the leaf extract in addition to that reported in the resin. The phenolic substances that the extracts contain are bactericidal because they can react chemically with the sensitive systems of the enzymes and make them catalytically inactive (Lira-Saldivar, 2003; Bakkali et al, 2008).

In the case of the oreganos, the inhibition of bacterial growth is possibly due to phenolic compounds, polymers and monomers, organic acids and phyto-alexins, which they contain (Osorio et al., 2010). This type of phytobiotics are considered as potentially safe sources (Lv et al., 2011; Rodriguez, 2011). The antifungal activity of extracts from plants such as L. tridentata is based on the ability of these phenolic compounds, poly and monomers, to form complexes with proteins and polysaccharides that are present in the outer membrane of the cell, destabilizing the function of the membrane and cell wall, causing the death of the microorganism (Aguilar et al., 2007).

On the other hand, essential oils share a similar chemical structure called isoprene, the chemical unit of the terpenoids, which derive in three phenols with phytobiotic properties: thymol, carvacrol and eugenol (Bakkali et al., 2008). According to the inclusion concentration, carvacrol and eugenol would dissociate the outer membranes of Gram negative bacteria such as E. coli, S. typhimurium, K. pneumoniae, Y. enterocolitica and E. cloacae; and Gram positive S. aureus, S. epidermidis, L. monocytogene and B. subtilis (Lee et al., 2003; Lv et al., 2011; Ayala et al., 2011; Solorzano-Santos and Miranda-Novales, 2012). NDGA is a phenolic derivative compound with antifungal activity on species like A. flavus and A. parasiticus (Moreno-Limon et al., 2011), and even greater sensitivity is reported on dermatophytes (Conner and Beuchat, 1984); however, levaduriform species are resistant to NDGA (Moreno-Limon, 2011) and the NGDA is not responsible for all of the antimicrobial activity (Lira-Saldivar, 2003).

Larrea tridentata inhibited, although in lesser degree, the growth of S. gallinarum and E. coli, two important bacteria that cause enteritis; the first of them in birds (Closa et al., 1999; Rosario, 2006) and the second one affecting humans (WHO, 2013). Salmonellosis, caused by Salmonella bacteria that can survive several weeks in a dry environment and several months in water, is the cause of the most common and widespread foodborne disease (WHO, 2013). As observed in the present work, there are species of the Salmonella genus that are susceptible to plant extracts.

It is possible that the NDGA has partial phytobiotic action on bacteria and that some other phenolic compound is playing a phytobiotic role in the leaf extracts, giving rise to other activities, not studied, with the use of L. tridentata. Its use does not cause bacterial resistance and favors the innocuousness of the feed, promoting its bactericidal or bacteriostatic potential with a lower environmental impact.

Conclusions

Larrea tridentata, in addition to its antifungal action, has a higher phytobiotic activity on Gram positive bacteria such as Staphylococcus and on Gram negative bacteria such as Salmonella, when compared to O. vulgare and P. amboinicus. It can be used in concentrations of 35% against Gram positive bacteria as well as Gram negative potentially pathogenic ones that endanger human health directly or indirectly. The study reveals the biological potential of L. tridentata and opens the possibility of seeking a greater use as a phytobiotic of this species than other, better known, oreganos.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank the Programa para el Desarrollo Profesional Docente (PRODEP), Chihuahua State, Mexico, for funding the research reported herein.

REFERENCES

Aguilar CN, Rodriguez R, Gutierrez-Sanchez G, Augur C, Favela-Torres E, Prado-Barragan LA, Ramirez-Coronel A, Contreras-Esquivel JC (2007) Microbial tannases: Advances and perpectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 76: 47-59.

Ayala L, Silvana N, Zocarrato I, Gomez S (2011) Utilizacion del oregano vulgar (Origanum vulgare) como fitobiotico en conejos de ceba. Rev. Cub. Cienc. Agric. 45: 159-161.

Bakkli F, Averbeck S, Averbeck D, Idaomar M (2008) Biological effects of essential oils- A review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 46: 446-475.

Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turk M (1996) Antibiotic susceptibility test by standarized single disk method. Am. J. Clin. Path. 45: 493-496.

Chavez L, Lopez A, Parra JE (2015) La inclusion de cepas probioticas mejora los parametros inmunologicos en pollos de engorde. Rev. CES Med. Vet. Zootec. 10: 160-169.

Closa SJ, Marchesich C, Cabrera M, Morales JC (1999) Composition of chicken and quail eggs. Arch. Latinoam. Nutr. 49: 181-185.

Conner DE, Beuchat LR (1984) Efects of essecial oils from plants on growth of food spoliage yeast. J. Food Sci. 49: 419-429.

Davis LE, Jin-Kun S, Yan C (1990) Antifulgal activity in human cerebro espinal fluid and plasma after intravenous administration of Allium sativant. Antimicrob. Ag. Chemother. 34: 651-653.

Garcia CL, Martinez RA, Ortega JLS, Castro BF (2010) Componentes quimicos y su relacion con las actividades biologicas de algunos extractos vegetales. Quim. Viva 2(9): 86-96.

Hascik P, Trenbecka L, Bobko M, Kacaniova M, Cubon J, Kunova S, Bucko O (2016) Effect of diet supplemented with propolis extract and probiotic additives on performance, carcass characteristics and meat composition of broiler chickens. Potravinarstvo 10: 1-5.

Holman DB, Chenier MR (2014) Temporal changes and the effect of subtherapeutic concentrations of antibiotics in the gut microbiota of swine. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 90: 599-608.

Ianez E (2005) Agentes Quimicos. Microbiologia General. Universidad de Granada, Espana. http://www.ugr. es/~eianez/Microbiologia/14ag quimicos.htm

Kalemba D, Kunicka AK (2003) Antibacterial and antifungal properties of essential oils. Curr. Med. Chem. 10: 813-829.

Kalra YP (1998) Handbook of Reference Methods for Plant Analysis. Soil and Plant Analysis Council, Inc. CRC Press, USA: 300 p.

Lee KW, Everts H, Kappert HJ, Yeom KH, Beynen AC (2003) Dietary carvacrol lowers body weight gain but improves feed conversion in female broiler chickens. J. Appl. Poultry Res. 12: 394-399.

Lira-Saldivar RH, Hernandez-Suarez M, Hernandez-Castillo FD (2006) Activity of Larrea tridentata (D.C.) Coville L. extracts and chitosan against fungi that affect horticultural crops. Rev. Chapingo Ser. Hort. 12: 211-216.

Lira-Saldivar RH (2003) Estado actual del conocimiento sobre las propiedades biocidas de la Gobernadora (Larrea tridentata). Rev. Mex. Fitopatol. 21: 214-222.

Lv F, Liang H, Yuan Q, Li C (2011) In vitro antimicrobial effects and mechanism of action of selected plant essential oil combinations against four food-related microorganisms. Food Res. Int. 44: 3057-3064.

Mehndiratta PL, Bhalla P (2014) Use of antibiotics in animal agriculture &amp; emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clones: need to assess the impact on public health. Indian J. Med. Res. 140: 339-344.

Mendenhall W, Beaver RJ (1994) Introduction to linear models and the design and analysis of experiments. In Mendenhall W (Ed.) Introduction to Probability and Statistics. Duxbury. Belmont, CA, USA. pp. 244-251.

Menendez CRA, Pavon GV (1999) Plectranthus amboinicus (Lour.) Spreng. Rev. Cub. Plantas Medic. 3(3): 110-115.

Moreno-Limon S, Gonzalez-Solis LN, Salcedo-Martinez SM (2011) Efecto antifungico de extractos de gobernadora (Larrea tridentata L.) sobre la inhibicion In vitro de Aspergillus flavus y Penicillium sp. Plibotanica 32: 193-205.

Nicoletti D, Quintana F, Terraes J, Kuttel J (2010) Parametros productivos y morfologicos en pollos parrilleros suplementados con acidos organicos y levadura. Sitio Argent. Prod. Anim. 21: 23-27.

Ojeda A (2008) El rompimiento de la humanidad con la naturaleza. Un abordaje desde la dialectica critica. Tecsistecatl: Econ. Soc. Mex. 1: 4.

OMS (2013) Centro de Prensa. Salmonella (no tifoidea), Nota descriptiva No. 139. http://www. who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/ fs139/es/# (04/15/2016).

Osorio E, Flores M, Hernandez D, Ventura J, Rodriguez R, Aguilar C (2010) Biological efficiency of polyphenolic extracts from pecan nuts shell (Carya Illinoensis), pomegranate husk (Punica granatum) and creosote bush leaves (Larrea tridentata Cov.) against plant pathogenic fungi. Indust. Crops Prod. 31: 153-157.

Rodriguez SEN (2011) Uso de agentes antimicrobianos naturales en la conservacion de frutas y hortalizas. Ra Ximhai 7: 153-170.

Rosario C (2006) Escherichia coli: Generalidades. FMVZ. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. 96 pp.

SAS (2009) SAS/STAT ver. 9.3. User's Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

Scharff RL (2012) Economic burden from health losses due to foodborne illness in the United States. J. Food Prot. 75: 123-131.

Sen S, Ingale SL, Kim JS, Kim KH, Kim YW, Khong C, Chae BJ (2011) Effect of supplementation of Bacillus subtilis LS 1-2 grown on citrus-juice waste and corn-soybean meal substrate on growth performance, nutrient retention, caecal microbiology and small intestinal morphology of broilers. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 24: 1120-1127.

Solorzano-Santos F, Miranda-Novales M (2012) Essential oils from aromatic herbs as antimicrobial agents. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 23: 136-141.

Tequida-Meneses M, Cortez-Rocha M, Rosas-Burgos EC, Lopez-Sandoval S, Corrales-Maldonado C (2002) Efecto de extractos alcoholicos de plantas silvestres sobre la inhibicion de crecimiento de Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus niger, Penicillium chrysogenum, Penicillium expansum, Fusarium moniliforme y Fusarium poae. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 19: 84-88.

Vargas-Arispuro I, Reyes-Baez R, Rivera-Castaneda G, Martinez-Tellez MA, Rivero-Espejel I (2005) Antifungal lignans from the creosotebush (Larrea tridentata). Indust. Crops Prod. 22: 101-107.

Mateo Itza-Ortiz, Jose Maria Carrera-Chavez, Edgar Aguilar-Urquizo and Jaime Eduardo Parra-Suescun

Mateo Itza-Ortiz (Corresponding author). Master in Animal Science, Instituto Tecnologico de Conkal, Mexico. Doctor in Animal Production and Health, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM). Professor, Universidad Autonoma de Ciudad Juarez (UACJ), Mexico. Address: Department of Veterinary Sciences, UACJ. Avenida Plutarco Elias Calles #1210, Foviste Chamizal, CP 32310, Cd. Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico. e-mail: mateo.itza@uacj.mx

Jose Maria Carrera-Chavez. Doctor in Veterinary Sciences, Universidad Autonoma de Zacatecas, Mexico. Master of Science, Universidad Autonoma de Chihuahua, Mexico. Professor, UACJ, Mexico. e-mail: jose.carrera@uacj.mx

Edgar Aguilar-Urquizo. Master in Animal Science, Instituto Tecnologico de Conkal, Mexico. Doctor in Agricultural Sciences, Universidad Autonoma de Yucatan), Mexico. Professor, Instituto Tecnologico de Conkal, Mexico. e-mail: edgar.aguilar@itconkal. edu.mx

Jaime Eduardo Parra-Suescun. Master of Science in Animal Production and Health, UNAM, Mexico. Doctor in Animal Sciences, Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia. Professor, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. e-mail: jeparrasu@unal.edu.co

Received: 02/27/2019. Modified: 05/22/2019. Accepted: 05/27/2019.

Caption: Figure 1. Halo of inhibition of bacterial growth (mm) of extracts Larrea tridentata, Origanum vulgare and Plectranthus amboinicus at 35% in a Petri dish with Muller Hinton agar inoculated with Salmonella enterica. Photograph by Mateo Itza-Ortiz.
TABLE I
PHYTOBIOTIC EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PLANT
EXTRACTS ON GRAM (+) AND GRAM (-) BACTERIA
MEASURED AS HALO OF INHIBITION OF BACTERIAL
GROWTH (MM)

Larrea tridentata         1.126 [+ or -] 0.713 a
Origanum vulgare          0.901 [+ or -] 0.622 b
Plectranthus amboincus    0.436 [+ or -] 0.528 c
level 30%                 0.763 [+ or -] 0.681 b
level 35%                 1.008 [+ or -] 0.745 a
level 40%                 0.691 [+ or -] 0.592 b

Means [+ or -]D.E. with different letters are statistically different
(P<0.05), according to the Tukey test.

TABLE II
HALO OF BACTERIAL GROWTH INHIBITION (MM) IN DIFFERENT CONCENTRATIONS
OF PLANT EXTRACTS

                               Extract (%)

                            Larrea tridentata

Bacterium

                         30%                   35%

S. pyogenes      1.20 [+ or -] 0.27 a   0.73 [+ or -] 0.67 b
St. aureus       1.73 [+ or -] 0.49 b   2.07 [+ or -] 0.46 b
E. faecalis      1.33 [+ or -] 0.35 b   2.33 [+ or -] 0.88 a
B. subtilis      1.33 [+ or -] 0.42 a   1.53 [+ or -] 0.55 a
K. oxytoca       0.70 [+ or -] 0.70 b   0.87 [+ or -] 0.25 b
E. coli          0.67 [+ or -] 1.16 b   1.33 [+ or -] 0.29 a
S. enterica      1.57 [+ or -] 0.56 a   1.53 [+ or -] 0.21 a
S. gallinarum    0.00 [+ or -] 0.00 b   0.80 [+ or -] 0.69 b

                               Extract (%)

                 Larrea tridentata     Oreganum vulgare

Bacterium

                         40%                   30%

S. pyogenes      0.50 [+ or -] 0.87 b   0.30 [+ or -] 0.52 a
St. aureus       1.77 [+ or -] 0.72 b   1.27 [+ or -] 0.50 a
E. faecalis      1.10 [+ or -] 0.10 b   0.90 [+ or -] 0.78 a
B. subtilis      1.23 [+ or -] 0.22 a   0.63 [+ or -] 0.32 a
K. oxytoca       0.37 [+ or -] 0.32 b   0.67 [+ or -] 0.32 a
E. coli          0.27 [+ or -] 0.46 b   0.33 [+ or -] 0.58 b
S. enterica      1.00 [+ or -] 0.00 a   1.37 [+ or -] 0.55 a
S. gallinarum    1.07 [+ or -] 0.15 a   0.37 [+ or -] 0.64 b

                               Extract (%)

                             Oreganum vulgare

Bacterium

                         35%                   40%

S. pyogenes      1.53 [+ or -] 0.84 b   0.40 [+ or -] 0.69 a
St. aureus       1.77 [+ or -] 0.25 a   1.40 [+ or -] 0.46 a
E. faecalis      0.90 [+ or -] 0.21 a   0.80 [+ or -] 0.36 a
B. subtilis      0.77 [+ or -] 0.31 a   0.67 [+ or -] 0.15 a
K. oxytoca       0.63 [+ or -] 0.11 a   0.90 [+ or -] 0.36 a
E. coli          1.07 [+ or -] 0.21 a   0.00 [+ or -] 0.00
S. enterica      1.87 [+ or -] 0.12 a   1.27 [+ or -] 0.29 a
S. gallinarum    1.03 [+ or -] 1.05 a   0.73 [+ or -] 0.64 b

                 Extract (%)

                 Plectranthus amboinicus

Bacterium

                         30%                   35%

S. pyogenes      0.77 [+ or -] 0.68 a   0.37 [+ or -] 0.64 a
St. aureus       0.27 [+ or -] 0.25 a   0.37 [+ or -] 0.35 a
E. faecalis      0.23 [+ or -] 0.21 a   0.00 [+ or -] 0.00
B. subtilis      0.63 [+ or -] 0.21 a   0.27 [+ or -] 0.31 a
K. oxytoca       0.00 [+ or -] 0.00     0.00 [+ or -] 0.00
E. coli          0.53 [+ or -] 0.92 a   0.80 [+ or -] 0.10 a
S. enterica      1.53 [+ or -] 0.06 a   0.97 [+ or -] 0.84 b
S. gallinarum    0.00 [+ or -] 0.00     0.60 [+ or -] 0.53 a

                 Plectranthus amboinicus

Bacterium

                           40%

S. pyogenes        0.47 [+ or -] 0.81 a
St. aureus         0.13 [+ or -] 0.23 a
E. faecalis        0.23 [+ or -] 0.21 a
B. subtilis        0.17 [+ or -] 0.29 a
K. oxytoca         0.37 [+ or -] 0.35 a
E. coli            0.00 [+ or -] 0.00
S. enterica        1.03 [+ or -] 0.38 a
S. gallinarum      0.73 [+ or -] 0.67 a
COPYRIGHT 2019 Interciencia Association
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2019 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Itza-Ortiz, Mateo; Carrera-Chavez, Jose Maria; Aguilar-Urquizo, Edgar; Parra-Suescun, Jaime Eduardo
Publication:Interciencia
Date:May 1, 2019
Words:3736
Previous Article:ANALYSIS OF EDUCATIONAL COMPETENCES TO EVALUATE ENTREPRENEURIAL PEOPLE/ANALISIS DE LAS COMPETENCIAS EDUCATIVAS PARA EVALUAR A LAS PERSONAS...
Next Article:ABOUT CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS OF RESEARCH DESIGNS IN PSYCHOLOGY: SIGNIFICANCE AND SCOPE/ACERCA DE LOS SISTEMAS DE CLASIFICACION DE DISENOS DE...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters