P3 hospitals a serious threat to the public health care system, economists argue.
The group commends the new provincial government for rejecting the P3 model for public hospitals, including those planned for Brampton and Ottawa.
The reports' authors are: Lewis Auerbach, Arthur Donner Phd., Douglas D. Peters Phd., Monica Townson and Armine Yalnizyan.
In a letter to the Ministers of Health and Long-Term Care, and Public Infrastructure Renewal, the authors describe P3 hospitals as posing "a serious threat to the public health care system." They urge the government "to carry through with the commitment to cancel the P3 projects proposed for the Royal Ottawa and William Osler Hospitals" and to "ensure that all future investment in public hospitals accords with the principles of public financing, ownership and not-for-profit administration."
The authors conclude that when properly accounted for, P3 hospitals "are likely to be 10% more costly than hospitals that are publicly financed, owned and operated."
Their report concludes that there is every reason to expect that if P3 hospitals were established in Ontario, they would result in "a deterioration of hospital services, diminished accountability, an increase in two-tier care, and needless cost." The authors claim the P3 system is likely to "discourage confidence in publicly funded health care, and weaken support for the medicare model."
The report was issued by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. 613-563-1341 x306
Link to a copy of the report visit www.communityaction.ca
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Date:||Nov 17, 2003|
|Previous Article:||Young teen girls vulnerable to depression, survey shows.|
|Next Article:||Nursing groups launch campaign to recruit a new generation of nurses.|
|Health Policy Reform: Competition and Controls.|
|There should be a law.|
|Reform roadmap: addressing costs is only half the solution.|