Printer Friendly

Oxidative Chlorination Leaching of Stibnite Using Acidic Ferric Chloride Lixiviant.

Byline: Muhammad Arif Bhatti, Ahmad Adnan, Abdul Ahad, Kamran Raza Kazmi and Adnan Akram

Summary: A hydrometallurgical process was developed for the preparation of commercial grade antimony trioxide (Sb2O3) from indigenous antimony ore. The developed process includes oxidative chlorination leaching of stibnite (Sb2S3) concentrate assaying 64.86% Sb prepared from indigenous low-grade ore containing 20.16% Sb using ferric chloride (FeCl3) solution in acidic medium as lixiviant followed by purification, precipitation and crystallization of antimony trioxide as end product. An effort was made to investigate the effect of all the important variables encountered in leaching of metallic sulphide minerals in order to establish the best process conditions for the extraction of antimony and subsequent preparation of antimony trioxide. The experiments were carried out on laboratory scale and the effect of various process variables on the dissolution of antimony from stibnite concentrate was studied by single factor variation method arranged in a sequential manner.

An industrial grade antimony trioxide having 99.70% purity with 90.72% yield has been prepared. The developed process is technically feasible and environmentally friendly.

Keywords: Stibnite ore, Flotation, Leaching, Ferric chloride, Extraction, Antimony trioxide.


Antimony trioxide Sb2O3 is one of the most important antimony compounds which has a large number of industrial applications. It is found in nature as the mineral valentinite (rhombic) and senarmontite (octahedral). The most abundant antimony mineral in the earth crust is stibnite (Sb2S3) which is converted to various oxide minerals on weathering. Synthetic antimony trioxide in powder form contains Sb2O3 content ranging from 99.5% - 99.9% with minor impurities of lead, iron and arsenic. It is an intermediate compound from which a large number of other antimony compounds are prepared [1]. Antimony trioxide (Sb2O3) is commonly used in flame retardant applications. It is used as a synergist containing 2-10% Sb2O3 along with halogenated compounds. Such flame retardants find applications in plastics, polymers, rubber, heavy textiles etc. It is used as a catalyst in the preparation of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic.

It is primarily used as heat and ultraviolet radiation stabilizer for polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic [2, 3]. It is also used as white pigment in weather resistant exterior paints, in special oil based paints and colour fastener in yellow paint. It is used as opacifier in vitreous enamel frits and glazes for sanitary ware. It is used as a degasser, decolourizer and antisolarant in a small amount ranging from 0.1-2% especially for television tube glass, optical glass, ruby glass and in fluorescent light bulb glass [4, 5]. General pyrochemical processes used industrially for the preparation of antimony trioxide from sulphide ores involve roasting of the high grade ore or concentrate. The resultant impure volatilized antimony trioxide is either purified in reverberatory furnace to produce pure antimony oxide or reduced with some carbon source by smelting at high temperature (1150AdegC to 1350AdegC) to produce antimony metal. The metal is re-volatilized to produce pure antimony trioxide.

Roasting and smelting of antimony ores under high temperature creates serious environmental pollution problems. Low boiling point valuable metals associated with antimony such as lead, cadmium, arsenic, mercury etc along with toxic gases generated such as SO2 are emitted in to the atmosphere. The loss of valuable by-product makes the process un-economical. These are the major concerns associated with pyrometallurgical processes [6]. The development of hydrometallurgical processes for the extraction of antimony from lowgrade stibnite ores without emitting SO2 gas to atmosphere has received considerable attention in recent years. Hydrometallurgical processes may be applied successfully for simple as well as complex antimony ores. Two general solvent systems with some modification are introduced in hydrometallurgical processing of antimony ores. These include the alkaline sulfide system and the acidic chloride system [7].

The alkaline sulfide system dominates the acidic chloride system and many industrial plants have employed it. It consists of two steps i.e. leaching and electrowinning. The leaching operation uses a mixture of sodium hydroxide and sodium sulphide and the reactions involved in the leaching operation are quite complicated. The second electrowinning step requires an ample supply of electrical energy that makes the process uneconomical. Therefore, a lot of research has been undertaken to utilize the acidic chloride system (8). Several hydrometallurgical processes using acidic media have been proposed for the treatment of low grade antimony ores by different researchers. Various leaching agents alone as well as in combination have been applied for leaching. These include: the dissolution of antimony sulphide in an aqueous solution of hydrochloric acid saturated with chlorine gas; in a mixture of hydrochloric and tartaric acid; in a mixture of nitric and tartaric acid; in water and hydrogen sulphide and so on [9].

However, the use of acidic ferric chloride to extract metals from complex sulphide ores has received great attention recently [10]. This is because the reaction of sulphides with ferric chloride proceeds very rapidly. Secondly, it produces elemental sulphur as by product instead of poisonous SO2 gas. Increasing interest due to the advantages of this reaction has stimulated a number of experimental studies for commercial applications [11].


Sample Preparation

The antimony ore used in this investigation was obtained from Krinj area; district Chitral, Khyber Pukhtoon Khwa (KPK) province, Pakistan. A representative sample of run-of-mine ore weighing about 100 Kg was collected by random sampling from a bulk sample of the ore weighing about 10 tones. The ore sample consisted of lumps ranging in sizes from 100-250 mm (4-10"). It was subjected to crushing, grinding and screening steps in order to reduce the particle size. Large lumps of ore were fed to a jaw crusher for primary crushing to reduce the size below 10-12 mm (~1/2"). The jaw crusher product was charged to a roll crusher for secondary crushing to attain the particle size below 4-6 mm (~1/4"). AA hhead sample for chemical analysis and Xray Diffraction studies was obtained by riffling of the crushed ore. It was pulverized separately in a disc pulverizer (Denver, USA) to pass 200 mesh sieves (75um) for chemical analysis and XRD studies. The rest of crushed ore was kept for leaching studies.

It was further ground in a laboratory rod mill to get the required feed size. The grinding time was adjusted accordingly to achieve the desired feed size of the sample where ore minerals were liberated from associated gangue minerals. The ground ore was fed to a vibrating screen fitted with sieve No. 100 mesh size (75um) for screening. Oversize ore sample was returned to the rod mill to achieve the undersize product. Finally a feed of 100% passing 100 mesh size (minus 150 um) was prepared by sieving for the leaching tests.

Chemical Analysis

The chemical analysis of head sample of the antimony ore was performed according to conventional gravimetric and volumetric methods as well as instrumental methods. The constituents such as silica, alumina, antimony, lead, barium and sulphur were estimated by gravimetric methods [11, 12]. Iron was determined by redox titration using standard solution of potassium dichromate [14]. Alkaline earth metals such as calcium and magnesium were estimated by complexometric titration, as well as by Atomic Absorption Spectrometer (Model: Z-8000, Hitachi, Japan) [15]. Alkali metals such as sodium and potassium were determined by Flame Photometer (Model: PFP7, Jenway Limited, England) [16]. The complete chemical analysis of head sample is shown in Table1. Moreover, the chemical analysis of leached solutions was also performed to determine the percent extraction of antimony.

Table-1: The chemical composition of head sample.





Silicon oxide(SiO2)###63.07

Iron oxide(Fe2O3)###4.10

Barium oxide(BaO)###0.68

Aluminum oxide(Al2O3)###0.56

Calcium oxide(CaO)###1.62

Magnesium oxide(MgO)###0.14

Sodium oxide(Na2O)###0.22

Potassium oxide(K 2O)###0.18

X-ray Diffraction

X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) technique was used to characterize the various types of mineral phases present in this ore. The ground sample of ore was run on an automatic X-ray Diffractometer (Model: D-5000, Siemens, Germany), which is equipped with a continuous scanning device. It has an X-ray tube consisting of a copper target which produces Cu K[alpha] radiations having wave length of 1.5406Ao. The sample, placed in a sample holder, was bombarded with Cu K[alpha] radiation of 40 kV and 30 mA with a sample rotation of 30 rpm. The diffraction patterns for the sample were measured with the scan angle (2-theta) ranging from 0Adeg to 60Adeg to get the main peaks of the minerals present in the ore. X-ray diffraction was done at 0.02 step size per second. The spectrum obtained shown in Fig. 1 was matched with standard data provided with the instrument to identify the crystalline mineral phases.

The mineral phases were identified by a search and match programme of the Joint Committee for Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS). The minerals identified are given in Table-2.

Table-2: The mineralogical composition of head sample.

Mineral Phases###Percentage(approx.)






Dolomite[Ca Mg(CO3)2]###<1



Flotation Tests

Flotation trials of the antimony ore were performed in a laboratory flotation machine (Model: D-12, Denver, USA) using stainless steel cells of 1 and 2 liters capacity. The surfaces of different minerals were modified by certain chemicals called as flotation reagents. Valuable (worthy) mineral was made hydrophobic while valueless (gangue) minerals hydrophilic with flotation reagents. Air was supplied to float the hydrophobic stibnite in the form of froth. Stibnite concentrate was removed from the surface of cell with the help of scraper and collected in a tray. It was dried in an electric oven at 110AdegC for subsequent chemical analysis. Flotation tests were performed to investigate the important flotation variables. The optimum conditions of flotation parameters and material balance of typical test are recorded in Table3 and 4 separately.

Table-3: The flotation parameters and the optimized conditions.

Rougher Flotation Parameters###Optimum Conditions

Grind size###80% passing 100 mesh #

Agitation speed###1200 rpm

Pulp density###25%

Pulp pH###~8.5

Lead nitrate###300g/ton

Potassium amyl xanthate###120g/ton

Pine oil###30g/ton

Sodium silicate###200g/ton

Sodium cyanide###50g/ton

Conditioning Time###15 min

Cleaning Flotation Parameters###Optimum Conditions

Grind size###100% passing 100 mesh #

Agitation speed###1000 rpm

Pulp density###15%

Pulp pH###~8.5

Lead nitrate###200g/ton

Potassium amyl xanthate###80g/ton

Pine oil###20g/ton

Sodium silicate###100g/ton

Sodium cyanide###30g/ton

Conditioning time###12 min

Re-Cleaning Flotation Parameters###Optimum Conditions

Grind size###100% passing 100 mesh #

Agitation speed###900 rpm

Pulp density###10%

Pulp pH###~8.5

Conditioning time###10 min

Table-4: Metallurgical balance calculations for flotation of antimony ore.

Flotation Products###Weight###Grade Sb###Recovery Sb


Re-cleaner concentrate###27.15###64.86###87.34

Re-cleaner tailings###3.47###22.31###3.84

(Cleaner concentrate)###30.62###60.04###91.18

Cleaner tailings###6.41###12.26###3.90

(Rougher concentrate)###37.03###51.76###95.08

Rougher tailings###62.97###1.57###4.92

Head sample (ore)###100###20.16###100

Preparation of Ferric chloride

Ferric chloride (FeCl3.6H2O) in association with HCl was used as lixiviant in the present study. It was prepared in the Mineral Processing Laboratory by reacting a stochiometric quantity of iron scale and commercial hydrochloric acid (37%). The solution of ferrous chloride (FeCl2) thus obtained was filtered. Chlorine gas (Cl2) was passed through it in order to convert ferrous chloride into ferric chloride. It was evaporated on a sand bath until a solution of about 1.8 g/cm 3 specific gravity was obtained. This was cooled in a desiccator to crystallize ferric chloride hexahydrate salt. Its purity was determined and found to be more than 98%.

Leaching Tests

Stibnite concentrate (Sb [greater than or equal to] 60%) was leached using commercial grade ferric chloride (FeCl3 [greater than or equal to] 95%). The leaching experiments were performed in batch-wise mode in order to determine the optimum leaching conditions for extraction of antimony from stibnite. Leaching tests were carried out in a Pyrex glass beaker (500 ml) placed on hot plate (made by PCSIR, Pakistan). The solution was stirred with a magnetic stirrer and heated on an automatic regulated hot plate with controlled heating. The leaching solution of ferric chloride (40%) was transferred to the beaker. Accurately weighed 10.00 g of stibnite concentrate was added in it. Water was added to maintain the desired L/S ratio. The pulp slurry was continuously stirred with the help of a magnetic stirrer and heated to attain the desired temperature.

The important parameters of leaching such as particle size of concentrate, liquid to solid ratio, FeCl3 concentration, HCl concentration, stirring speed, reaction time, reaction temperature were investigated in order to find the best conditions for dissolution of antimony from stibnite mineral in leached liquor. The results obtained are presented in graphical form in Figs 2-8.

###Experimental conditions:

Particle size of conc.###=###85% minus 200 mesh

HCl concentration###=###10g/L

Stirring speed###=###500rpm

Liquid to solid ratio###=###10

Reaction temperature###=###90AdegC

Retention time###=###60 min

###Experimental conditions:

Particle size of conc.###=###85% minus 200 mesh

FeCl3 concentration###=###250g/L

Stirring speed###=###500rpm

Liquid to solid ratio###=###10

Reaction temperature###=###90AdegC

Retention time###=###60 min

###Experimental conditions:

FeCl3 concentration###=###250g/L

HCl concentration###=###15g/L

Stirring speed###=###500rpm

Liquid to solid ratio###=###10

Reaction temperature###=###90AdegC

Retention time###=###60 min

###Experimental conditions:

Particle size of conc.###=###100% minus 200 mesh

FeCl3 concentration###=###250g/L

HCl concentration###=###15g/L

Liquid to solid ratio###=###10

Reaction temperature###90AdegC

Retention time###60 min

###Experimental conditions:

Particle size of conc.###=###100% minus 200 mesh

FeCl3 concentration###=###250g/L

HCl concentration###=###15g/L

Stirring speed###=###400rpm

Reaction temperature###=###90AdegC

Retention time###=###60 min

###Experimental conditions:

Particle size of conc.###=###100% minus 200 mesh

FeCl3 concentration###=###250g/L

HCl concentration###=###15g/L

Stirring speed###=###400rpm

Liquid to solid ratio###=###12

Retention time###60 min

###Experimental conditions:

Particle size of conc.###=###100% minus 200 mesh

FeCl3 concentration###=###250g/L

HCl concentration###=###15g/L

Stirring speed###=###400rpm

Liquid to solid ratio###=###12

Reaction temperature###=###90AdegC

Filtration and Washing

The pregnant leached solution (PLS) was filtered from residual matter using a Gooch crucible funnel with the help of vacuum filtration pump for efficient filtration. It was followed by washing with dilute hydrochloric acid (1:10) to make the residual matter free from antimony content. The volume of the solution was made up to mark in 100 ml measuring flasks. An aliquot of 5 mL of leached liquor was taken out with the help of pipette to analyze the metal content dissolved in the leached solution. The concentration of antimony dissolved was used to calculate the recovery of antimony. Remaining leached solution was stored in a polythene bottles for hydrolyzing studies.

Hydrolysis and Precipitation of Antimony Trioxide

After optimizing the leaching parameters, all the stored pregnant leached solutions were mixed to make a bulk solution. It was hydrolyzed with 1 N NaOH solution to precipitate antimony oxychloride/antimony oxide chloride. The hydrolysis of antimony chloride solution was studied by varying the pH from 1 to 6 at 25AdegC by adjusting with NaOH solution and holding for different period of time. The white precipitates formed were filtered off using a glass funnel and washed with distilled water to remove the attached impurities. The washed precipitates were then dissolved in aqueous ammonia (NH4OH) solution to prepare pure antimony trioxide crystals. Finally, the product was dried in a desiccator and then in an electric oven at 105AdegC. The final antimony trioxide obtained was analyzed for antimony content in order to calculate the parentage purity and yield of the product. A complete process flow-sheet has been proposed.

Results and Discussion

Chemical Composition of Ore

It is evident from the chemical analysis results of the representative sample of ore (Table-1) that the antimony (Sb) content of the ore under investigation is 20.16%. The undesirable elements determined are silica (SiO2), alumina (Al2O3), iron oxide (Fe2O3), barium oxide (BaO), calcium oxide (CaO), magnesium oxide (MgO), sodium oxide (Na2O) and potassium oxide (K2O). It is also clear from this table that silica is the main unwanted impurity being 63.07%.

Mineralogical Composition of Ore

The mineralogical composition of ore (Table-2) obtained by X-ray diffraction analysis confirms the presence of stibnite (Sb2S3), quartz (SiO2), pyrite (FeS2), boulangerite (Pb5Sb4S11), calcite (CaCO3), barite (BaSO4) and clay minerals. It was identified by JCP.CAT search and match programme of the X-ray Diffractometer that the d values of the major peaks of the X-ray diffractogram (Fig. 4) of the ore correspond to the standard d values of these minerals. It can be determined easily from the chemical and mineralogical results that silica is present mainly due to quartz mineral and partially by clay minerals. After silica the other major impurity is iron, which is present in the form of pyrite. Calcium oxide is present in the ore due to calcite and barium oxide due to barite, whereas aluminum oxide, sodium oxide and potassium oxide are mainly associated withdifferent clay minerals.

Flotation Results

It is clear from the flotation tests (Table-4) that ore is upgraded by rougher flotation to a rougher concentrate containing 51.76% Sb content with 95.08% recovery. The optimized rougher flotation conditions (Table-3) were: pH of pulp 8.5; grind size of ore 80% passing 100 mesh; the amount of lead nitrate as stibnite activator 300 g/ton; amyl xanthate as a stibnite collector 120 g/ton; pine oil as a frother 30 g/ton; sodium silicate as a gangue depressor 200 g/ton and sodium cyanide as a pyrite depressor 50 g/ton. Microscopic examination of rougher concentrate showed that it still contained some middling particles which needed to be librated. Therefore, the rougher concentrate was further ground in a rod mill to liberate the locked stibnite grains. The ground rougher concentrate was cleaned by cleaning flotation to produce a cleaner concentrate assaying 60.84% Sb content with 91.18% recovery.

Additional amounts of collector and forther were required to float the newly liberated fine stibnite grains. Moreover, an additional amount of sodium silicate depressant was also applied in the cleaning operation to depress the silica and clays. Similarly, sodium cyanide was added to depress the pyrite grains as shown in Table-3. The cleaner concentrate was upgraded to a re-cleaner concentrate assaying 64.86% Sb content with 87.34% recovery by another cleaning flotation, without using additional quantity of flotation reagents. The purpose of re-cleaning was to remove any adhering particles attached to the cleaner concentrate during cleaning flotation and to make the final concentrate as free as possible from gangue particles. The re-circulation of the tailings from the cleaning and re-cleaning stages according to the grade at an appropriate point of addition has improved the overall recovery of the antimony flotation process (Fig. 9).

The chemical analysis of the final concentrate (Table-5) shows that it contains 64.85% Sb content. The antimony content of the ore under investigation is increased by flotation from 20.16% to 64.86%. It is also clear from the results that the silica content of the ore is reduced from 63.07% to 2.08%. The other impurities such as Fe2O3, Al2O3, Cao, Na2O and K2O are also reduced considerably. The flotation process has been found quite successful as it improved the grade of ore significantly by reducing the gangue material of the ore. The results prove the suitability of the process selected for this ore [17].

Table-5: The chemical analysis of final stibnite concentrate.





Silicon oxide(SiO2)###2.08

Iron oxide(Fe2O3)###1.10

Aluminum oxide(Al2O3)###0.15

Calcium oxide(CaO)###0.32

Magnesium oxide(MgO)###0.10

Sodium oxide(Na2O)###0.12

Potassium oxide(K 2O)###0.09

Leaching Results

Stibnite concentrate contains about 90% Sb2S3 content. The remaining 10% portion of the concentrate consists of silica, lead sulphide, iron sulphide, clays and some other minor impurities. FeCl3 has been successfully used as a lixiviant for complex sulphide minerals by many researchers because it is a highly reactive and oxidizing chemical [18, 21]. The present investigation is focused on the study of the role of the ferric ions in leaching of stibnite and to determine the optimum leaching conditions.

Effect of FeCl3 Concentration

In present process, ferric chloride reacts with antimony trisulphide to produce an antimony trichloride. The role of ferric chloride concentration on the extraction of antimony chloride from stibnite concentrate was studied by varying the concentration of FeCl3 over a range of 100-300 g/L and keeping other parameters constant at arbitrary selected values. The quantity of concentrate was fixed at 10 g. The results obtained are plotted in Fig. 2. It is apparent from this Fig. that the ferric chloride concentration has a significant inuence on the dissolution of stibnite mineral. Under similar leaching conditions, the rate of dissolving antimony from stibnite increases steadily with increasing ferric chloride concentration.

Actually, increase in FeCl3 concentration accelerates the dissolution rate at which antimony becomes soluble in the leach solution. At FeCl3 concentration of 250 g/L, the dissolution reaches a maximum value of 92.48% after which it becomes constant. Hence this value was selected for onward study.

Effect of HCl Concentration

Hydrochloric acid (HCl) in conjunction with ferric chloride (FeCl3) was employed for maximum extraction of antimony as chloride from stibnite concentrate. The addition of HCl prevents the hydrolysis of ferric chloride and is necessary to dissolve it in solution [19]. The effect of hydrochloric acid concentration on antimony chloride recovery was studied by varying its concentration over a range of 1 to 20g/L. The results obtained are shown in Fig. 3. It is notable that HCl concentration has an important effect on the dissolution of antimony from stibnite concentrate. Increasing the HCl concentration enhances the rate of leaching of flotation concentrate as shown by the data in Fig. 3. Optimum antimony chloride extraction was achieved at HCl concentration of 15g/L. About 82.51% antimony was dissolved from stibnite concentrate in the absence of HCl, whereas 93.27% was recovered at HCl concentration of 15g/L after that dissolution of antimony was almost the same even at higher acid concentrations.

Effect of Particle Size After optimizing the above mentioned leaching parameters, the effect of particle size of concentrate on leaching of stibnite was studied. For this purpose, the concentrate was ground in a rod mill and sieved into four size fractions (70%, 80%, 90% and 100% passing 200 mesh size) for antimony extraction experiments. The results obtained are shown graphically in Fig. 4. It was observed from this Fig. that the rate of antimony dissolution increases with decreases in particle size up to 100% passing 200 mesh size. It was found that smaller particle size resulted in higher extraction of antimony from stibnite concentrate in the leached solution as well as increases the rate of antimony leaching by the lixiviant. It can be deduced from these experiments that the rate of dissolution is directly related to particle size. In fact, the rate of antimony dissolution increases with decrease in particle size due to increase in the surface area on grinding.

Since fine grinding is an energy intensive process therefore 100% passing 200 mesh size was selected for this investigation and further grinding of the concentrate was avoided [21].

Effect of Stirring Speed

The influence of stirring speed (agitation) on the dissolution of antimony from stibnite concentrate by ferric chloride solution was investigated by varying it at 100, 200, 300, 400 and 500 rpm respectively. A hot plate with magnetic stirrer was used for this study. The results of these tests are presented in Fig. 5, which shows that agitation of the solution during leaching greatly facilitates the reaction of the antimony trisulphide with ferric chloride. This may be due to the reason that with continuous stirring, the rate of collision of stibnite particles with FeCl3 increases [22]. Maximum 93.51% of antimony was dissolved from the stibnite concentrate at an agitation speed of 400 rpm and therefore selected in subsequent experiments. It was found that above 400 rpm, the rate of agitation did not improve the extraction of antimony. It indicates that there was an adequate suspension of the solid particles in the slurry at or above 400 rpm.

Effect of Liquid to Solid Ratio

The effect of liquid to solid ratio upon antimony dissolution in the slurry is another very important factor that needs to be studied. Leaching tests were carried out at different liquid to solid ratio (6, 8, 10, 12 and 14) of solution. To study the influence of liquid to solid ratio on the dissolution of antimony, the amount of sample and concentration of FeCl3 solution were kept constant while volumes of solution were changed by adding distilled water. The results obtained are illustrated in Fig. 6. The Fig. shows that the liquid to solid ratio has a substantial effect on the extraction of antimony from stibnite. It is evident from this Fig. that at a liquid to solid ratio 10, the recovery is 92.45% and at 12, the recovery is slightly higher i.e. 93.48%, after which it decreased.

The results presented in Fig. 6 clearly indicate that maximum antimony extraction took place at liquid to solid ratio of 12. About 93.48% antimony was dissolved from stibnite concentrate at this value and it was adopted for next tests. It is also obvious from this Fig. that further increasing liquid to solid ratio does not increase the rate of dissolution. In fact, it was observed that antimony dissolution in solution decreased with increasing liquid to solid ratio after 12.

Effect of Leaching Temperature

Effect of reaction temperature is another important parameter which is required to be investigated. Five experiments were performed to study the effect of temperature on the extraction of antimony chloride from stibnite concentrate in the range of 60AdegC to 100AdegC. The results of the variation of reaction temperature on the rate of dissolution of antimony from stibnite concentrate are plotted in Fig. 7. It is obvious from this Fig. that the rate of leaching increases gradually with increasing temperature. After one hour leaching time, about 57.84% of antimony was dissolved from stibnite concentrate at a reaction temperature of 60AdegC, whereas 75.28% of antimony was dissolved at a temperature of 70AdegC, 86.76% of antimony was dissolved at a temperature of 80AdegC, 94.97% of antimony was dissolved at a temperature of 90AdegC and 95.04% of antimony was dissolved at a temperature of 100AdegC.

Antimony dissolution increased with temperature and the highest and fastest dissolution rate of stibnite (94.97%) was obtained at 90AdegC in 60 min. For all temperature values, there was an increasing effect on antimony leaching recovery with increasing the temperature. It is noticed from Fig. 6 that the optimum result (94.97%) is achieved after 90AdegC and below that temperature recovery is lower. This was considered as optimum leaching temperature.

Effect of Leaching Time

Reaction time has a significant effect on the yield of product from the concentrate. It permits the surface of the stibnite particles to react with the FeCl3. In order to study the effect of variation of reaction time on the recovery of antimony chloride from stibnite grains, five experiments were carried out for different reaction times (i.e. 15 min, 30 min, 45 min and 60 min). The results obtained are presented in Fig. 8. It is clear from this Fig. that the leaching of stibnite is a direct function of time interval. It is noticed that the dissolution rate of antimony increases with increase in reaction time and optimum result are achieved after 45 min. It was also observed that agitation of the solution during leaching greatly helped the leaching of antimony as chloride.

It is obvious from this Fig. that about 68.54% of antimony was dissolved from stibnite concentrate in 15 min, 85.90% dissolved in 30 min, 94.96% dissolved in 45 min, whereas about 95.17% of antimony was dissolved from stibnite concentrate in 60 min at a temperature of 90AdegC. The reason is that with stirring the rate of collision of iron ions and antimony ions increases with leaching time. It may be pointed out from these results that 45 min leaching time is required to get the optimum result and hence this value was selected.

Filtration of Leached Solution

Ferric chloride (FeCl3) along with hydrochloric acid (HCl) served as the lixiviant to dissolve the antimony from antimony trisulphide. It is supposed that antimony trisulphide and ferric chloride react in the following manner.

Sb2S3 + 6FeCl3a 2SbCl3 + 6FeCl2 + 3SAdeg

The oxide minerals such as senarmontite, valentinite, kermesite and stibiconite, if present, directly react with HCl without requiring FeCl3 during leaching process.

Sb2O3 + 6HCl a 2SbCl3 + 3H2O

In aqueous medium, ferric chloride (FeCl3) acts as an oxidizing and a chloridizing agent. It converts the antimony sulfide mineral into antimony chloride complex with the production of elemental sulfur. During this reaction ferric chloride is reduced to ferrous chloride and sulphide ions are oxidized into elemental sulfur [23]. The primary reaction takes place as given below.

S2- a 2e-Adeg + S

Fe3+- + 1e a Fe2+

It was found that best yield is achieved when antimony trisuphide and ferric chloride are contacted in leach solution for 45 min. The antimony trichloride and ferrous chloride remain in solution while sulfur particles go in suspension. The aqueous solution comprises of about 250g/L ferric chloride. In order to dissolve this quantity of ferric chloride in aqueous solution it is acidified with hydrochloric acid (HCl) having concentration about 15g/L. When ferric chloride completely reacts with the antimony trisulphide, the resulting reaction mixture consists of antimony trichloride, ferric chloride, ferrous chloride, lead chloride, sulfur particles and other un-reacted material such as quartz and clay. The sulfur particles in suspension and other insoluble matter are separated by vacuum filtration process from the reaction mixture. The insoluble matter mainly contains quartz, lead chloride and clay particles.

Hydrolysis Precipitation of Leached Solution

The pregnant liquid solution contains antimony trichloride, ferrous chloride and small amount of ferric chloride. Antimony chloride leached out in solution on hydrolysis with water and NaOH solution at pH around 2 immediately produces solid precipitate of antimony oxychloride (SbOCl) whereas ferrous chloride and ferric chloride remain in solution. It was observed that complete precipitation occurs between pH 2-3. Some of the antimony oxychloride may also is converted into antimony oxide chloride (Sb4O5Cl2) on further reaction. The reactions occurring during this hydrolysis process are illustrated in following equations [24].

SbCl3 + H2O a SbOCl + 2HCl

4SbOCl + H2O a Sb4O5Cl2 + 2HCl

The solid precipitates of antimony oxychloride and antimony oxide chloride on treatment with aqueous ammonia form pure precipitate of antimony trioxide (Sb2O3). Thereactions occurring during this hydrolysis step are shown below.

2SbOCl + 2NH4OH a Sb2O3 + 2NH4Cl + H2O

Sb4O5Cl2 + 2NH4OH a 2Sb2O3 + 2NH4Cl + H2O

It was observed that maximum precipitation of antimony trioxide occurred when pH of reaction mixture was maintained in the range of 8.0-8.5. The pH controlled by ammonium hydroxide in this range facilitates the production of antimony trioxide with senarmontite crystals [25]. The purity of developed antimony oxide determined on the basis of weight and antimony content was found to be 99. 70% with 90.52% yield. The ammonium chloride produced as a byproduct during hydrolysis may be recycled according to the following reaction:

NH4Cl + NaOH a NH4OH + NaCl

The gaseous ammonium hydroxide produced may be readily dissolved in water to produce an aqueous solution of ammonium hydroxide which may be used in the hydrolysis reaction again. Ferrous chloride produced during reaction is converted into ferric chloride by oxidation process. Chlorine gas (Cl2) oxidizes Fe (II) ions to Fe (III) ions again. In the chlorination reaction chlorine gas reacts with ferrous chloride pursuant to the following reaction:

2FeCl2 + Cl2 a 2FeCl3

Thus, the chlorination step regenerates ferric chloride, which is then reused to leach stibnite concentrate. The solid waste products produced during leaching such as silica and clay may be disposed of relatively easily. The salts of heavy metal (PbCl2) may be recovered from the residual matter.

The main advantage of the developed process is that it produces the least amount of environmentally hazardous emissions such as SO2 and H2S gases. Solid valuable by-products obtained include elemental sulphur and heavy metal salts such as lead chloride which is a great advantage of this process when it is compared with other pyrometallurgical processes. The lixiviant is recycled after proper treatment and reused without disposing it to waste. Hence the process is a closed system and mitigates the cost required for the purchase of new raw material for continuous production. Furthermore, it is economically favorable because it does not require costly equipment used for conventional roasting, smelting and electrolysis and scrubbers to remove emissions of toxic SO2 gas. Moreover, the process works under atmospheric pressure and at relatively low temperature. The plant based on this process may be established at the mine site.

These advantages enable the reduction in overall costs of the process and make it commercially viable for industrial scale implementation. However, the only disadvantage associated with this process is corrosion issues of the chloride system.


The flotation step was found quite suitable for the preparation of high-grade antimony concentrate assaying 64.86% Sb from low-grade stibnite ore containing 20.06% Sb. Leaching experimental results using ferric chloride in acidic medium as lixiviant have shown that particle size of 100% passing 200 mesh of stibnite concentrate, liquid to solid ratio of 12, ferric chloride concentration of 250g/L in solution, HCl concentration of 15g/L, stirring speed of 400 rpm, reaction time of 45 min and reaction temperature of 90AdegC resulted in higher concentrations of antimony in the leached solution. A commercial grade antimony trioxide having purity 99.70% with 90.52% yield has been prepared on laboratory scale. The developed process is ideally suitable for utilization of low grade stibnite ore as a starting material. The process is technically feasible and economically favorable as the lixiviant can be recycled.

It is environmentally friendly because it produces the least amount of sulphur dioxide (SO2) gas. A pilot plant study is suggested in order to establish its industrial viability.


1. S. C. Grund, K. Hanusch, H. J. Breunig and H. U. Wolf, Antimony and Antimony Compounds in: Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry (UEIC), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp.113 (2006).

2. I. Touval, Antimony and other inorganic flame retardants, in: Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 4th Edition. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 10, 936 (1994).

3. D. Edward, Weil Sergei V. Levchik, Flame Retardants for Plastics and Textiles Practical Applications, Hanser Publishers, Munich, Germany, pp. 25 (2009).

4. J. F. Carlin, Antimony (Advance Release), U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S.G.S., Reston, Virginia: pp. 6.1-6.8 (2012).

5. D. E. Guberman, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2016, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S.G.S., Reston, Virginiapp, pp. 24 (2016).

6. C. G. Anderson, The metallurgy of antimony, Chem. Erde., 72, 3(2012).

7. E. Smincakova, P. Raschman, Leaching of stibnite by mixed Na2S and NaOH solutions, Acta Technica Corviniensis, Bull. Eng., 1, 35 (2012).

8. L. H. Madkour, I. A. Salem, Electrolytic recovery of antimony from natural stibnite ore, Hydrometallurgy, 43, 265 (1996).

9. M. Copur, A. Yartasi, C. Ozmetin and M. Kocakerim, Solubility of stibnite ore in HCl solutions saturated with Cl2 gas, Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q., 15, 25 (2001).

10. T. Mahlangu, F. Gudyanga, D. Simbi, Reductive leaching of stibnite (Sb2S3) flotation concentrate using metallic iron in a hydrochloric acid medium, Hydrometallurgy, 84, 192 (2006).

11. P. C. Rath, R. K. Paramguru and P. K. Jena, Kinetics of dissolution of sulphide minerals in ferric chloride solution. Extr. Metall. 97, 150 (1988).

12. G. H. Jeffery, J. Bassett, J. Mendham, R. C. Denney, Titrimetry and Gravimetry, in: Vogel's Textbook of Quantitative Chemical Analysis, Longman Limited, Singapore, pp. 257 (1997).

13. ASTM. Standard, Test Method for the Determination of Silica in Ores and Related Materials by Gravimetry (E 247-01), ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, USA, 03. 35, 171 (2004).

14. ASTM. Standard, Test Method for the Determination of Iron in Ores and Related Materials by Dichromate, (E 246-01), ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, USA, 03.35, 162 (2004).

15. ASTM. Standard, Test Method for the Determination of Calcium and Magnesium in Ores and Related Materials by Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, (E 508-03), ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, USA, Vol. 03.35, 564 (2004).

16. ASTM. Standard, Test Method for the Determination of Sodium and Potassium in Ores and Water by Flame Photometry, (E 395-02), ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, USA, 03.35, 473 (2004).

17. M. A. Bhatti, K. R. Kazmi, M. S. Nizami, M. S. Anwar, M.Habib, Beneficiation studies on lowgrade stibnite ore of Chitral, NWFP, Pakistan, Pak. J. Sci. Ind. Res., 50, 340 (2008).

18. T. Havlik, Z. Ivanova, J. Dvorscikova, R. Kammel, Extraction of copper and antimony from tetrahedrite by acid oxidative leaching. Metall., 53, 390 (1999).

19. M. J. N. Correia, J. R. Carvalho, A. J. Monhemius, The leaching of tetrahedrite in ferric chloride solutions. Hydrometallurgy, 57, 167 (2000).

20. Z. Wang, Y. Fang, Wang and Y. Chen, Electro generative leaching of galena with ferric chloride, Miner. Eng., 16, 869 (2003).

21. S. Aydogan, A. Aras, M. Canbazoglu, Dissolution kinetics of sphalerite in acidic ferric chloride leaching. Chem. Eng. J., 114, 67 (2005).

22. A. Dodangeh, M. Halali, M. Hakim and M. R. Bakhshandeh, Leaching kinetics of stibnite in sodium hydroxide solution, Int. J. Eng., 27, 325 (2014).

23. H. Hashimoto, T. Nishimura, Y. Umetsu, Hydrolysis of Antimony (III)-Hydrochloric Acid Solution at 25AdegC, Mater. Trans., 44, 1624 (2003).

24. J. D. Thibault, M. D. MacDonald and D. A. Stevens, Process for producing antimony trioxide, Roycefield Resources Ltd, US Patent No. 5783166 A, (1998).

25. A. H. Abdullah, N. M. Noor, I. Ramli, M. Hashim, Effect of precipitation route on the properties of antimony trioxide, Mater. Chem. Phys., 111, 201 (2008).
COPYRIGHT 2018 Asianet-Pakistan
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Bhatti, Muhammad Arif; Adnan, Ahmad; Ahad, Abdul; Kazmi, Kamran Raza; Akram, Adnan
Publication:Journal of the Chemical Society of Pakistan
Article Type:Technical report
Date:Dec 31, 2018
Previous Article:SHORT COMMUNICATION - Physicochemical Properties of the Complex of Glucosyl-[beta]-cyclodextrin and Sesamol.
Next Article:Ferrocene derivatives: Potential anticancer material.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |