Printer Friendly

Outcry for redistricting reform picks up: civil rights groups fear redrawn districts will disenfranchise minorities.

A growing movement to reform redistricting rules is taking shape across the country, as civil rights leaders and politicians work to preserve the right of African Americans to have their votes counted fairly.

"Everybody should be able to elect a candidate of choice," says Crispian Kirk bureau counsel for the NAACP. "And a lot of times African Americans have not been able to do that because of [redistricting] schemes, and therefore their vote is diluted."

Redistricting is the process of redrawing legislative boundaries based on population. The Constitution requires states to redraw political boundaries every 10 years to reflect changes in population recorded in the census.

Following the 1964 U.S. Supreme Court cases Wesberry v. Sanders and Reynolds v. Sims, lawmakers strived to make sure state legislative districts are "as nearly of equal population as is practicable." Since then, results of the decennial census have been used--no later than the following year--to ensure that voting districts are created using the most current population statistics.

The redistricting process has historically been subject to criticism because state legislators are the ones who draw the lines. "We have incumbent lawmakers who are, by the nature of this task, conflicted," says Jon Goldin-Dubois, vice president of state campaign operations for Common Cause, a group that is working with civil rights leaders and other organizations to organize redistricting reform efforts.

"How can you have those who are in office draw their own districts and districts for their friends and colleagues? It's a fundamental conflict of interest," Goldin-Dubois says. Many also believe such a practice could disenfranchise entire groups of voters, including minorities.

Further muddying the issue, in 2003, Texas Republicans managed to push through a mid-decade redistricting plan that culminated in a Republican victory in four races. Many political observers--both Democratic and Republican--are against the idea, arguing that mid-decade redistricting endangers the voting process because it is not based on the most current population information.

In response to those fears, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) proposed legislation in February to limit redistricting to once every 10 years: the bill has yet to move through the voting process. Legislation is also being pushed to change those responsible for overseeing the process.

Redistricting has become a topic of interest in states besides Texas. In Massachusetts, California, Ohio, and Florida, coalitions and political leaders are working to pass reform measures that would establish criteria guiding the redistricting process, take the responsibility away from state legislatures, give the authority to nonpartisan independent councils, and create a more transparent and open process. California and Ohio are each set to have redistricting issues on their Nov. 8 ballot. In Florida, a campaign is under way to get redistricting reform measures included on the 2006 ballot.

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger backs Proposition 77, which calls for a panel of retired judges to oversee redistricting. Although intended to give the voting public its deserving power, a recent poll conducted by the Public Policy Institute of California, a nonprofit organization that conducts independent research, found that more voters oppose the proposal (49%) than support it (34%), with a small group still undecided (17%).

Kirk says African Americans can contribute to redistricting reform efforts by contacting their elected officials and the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division Voting Section if they believe their voice has been muted through the redistricting process. The NAACP may also file suit against a jurisdiction if it finds that voting rights have been compromised.

"Locally-elected officials are perhaps the most important people as far as elected officials are concerned because they help determine how money is spent in a jurisdiction," says Kirk "That's why African Americans should care about this."

--Tamara E. Holmes

Additional reporting by Tennille M. Robinson
COPYRIGHT 2005 Earl G. Graves Publishing Co., Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Holmes, Tamara E.
Publication:Black Enterprise
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Nov 1, 2005
Words:619
Previous Article:Report reveals best lenders for black business: findings lead to renewed calls for public analysis of SBA loans.
Next Article:Historic church in store for revival: site of 1963 bombing to become a national landmark.
Topics:


Related Articles
Redistricting expected to increase black influence.
Voting wrongs.
The shape of things to come: Cleo Fields is the first to fall as redistricting changes the political map.
Minority voting rights and the Supreme Court.
The incredible shrinking legislature: redistricting is hard enough, but to try to combine it with downsizing is more than just tough. This year the...
Supreme Court tackles Texas: the high court bas waded into the thicket of Texas politics, agreeing to review controversial redistricting there that...
No party for the GOP? Clinton's mid-term election was bad news for Democrats who lost 500 legislative seats. Some prognosticators think Republicans...

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters