Osteoid osteoma of the coracoid process: Case report with literature review.
Key words: Osteoma, osteoid; Scapula--pathology; Shoulder joint--pathology; Pain--therapy; Case reports
Osteoid osteoma (OO) is the most common benign osteogenic bone tumor (75%-85% of all benign osteogenic bone tumors), and accounts for 4%-5.5% of all primary bone tumors (13). It typically occurs in young adults, with a marked male predominance (2-4:1) (1). Histologically, OO is composed of two well distinctive zones: central nidus and the surrounding zone of reactive bone sclerosis (4). Prostaglandins (PG), particularly PGE2 and PGI2, released by osteoblastic tumor cells and nerve fibers found in reactive zone and in the nidus, are assumed to be a mediator responsible for severe nocturnal pain, which responds well to the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) treatment (5,6).
Although this type of tumor may appear throughout the skeleton, significant predilection has been described for long bones of lower extremities, affecting femur and tibia with a prevalence of approximately 50% (1,7,8). Vertebrae are affected in approximately 10% of all cases, while the humerus, acetabulum, talus, calcaneus, metacarpus and scapula, together with coracoid process (CP) represent atypical localizations (7,9,10). OO of the scapula, and particularly of the CP, is a rarely seen condition, which is the reason it is often not included in the differential diagnosis of shoulder pain in younger individuals.
A great number of methods have been described in the treatment of OO including a wide spectrum ranging from seldom-used conservative approach with NSAIDs over minimally invasive percutaneous treatments (mechanical, chemical or thermal ablation) to open surgical methods (en bloc resections and curettage techniques) (9-21). Therapeutic approach merely depends on numerous factors, among which anatomical localization is one of the most important factors in decision-making. Therefore, optimal therapeutic approach should be considered and selected for each patient individually.
A 22-year-old male amateur soccer goalkeeper without history of previous trauma was referred to our Department with one-year history of left shoulder pain. The pain sensation was present constantly in the anterior part of the shoulder, spreading to the left upper arm. Pain intensity significantly escalated during the night and ceased immediately upon NSAID treatment. During clinical examination, the patient reported pain sensation in the projection of the left CP. Shoulder range of motion was neither restricted nor painful and muscle strength was well preserved. Clinical orthopedic examination of the shoulder did not reveal any specific pathology. There were no signs of fracture or other pathology present on plain anteroposterior and axillary radiographic projections (Fig. 1A). Left shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detected a focal cystic-like lesion of the CP, which was slightly more voluminous. After application of paramagnetic contrast, the lesion displayed intensive inhomogeneous imbibition associated with perifocal soft-tissue imbibition (Fig. IB). According to this radiological finding, OO of the left CP was suspected and computerized tomography (CT) was indicated. CT scan revealed a well-separated 6 mm wide radiolucent zone, with signs of partial sclerosis (Fig. 1C). Altogether, these findings strongly suggested the presence of OO in the area of the left CP, and surgical treatment was indicated.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
After thorough preoperative planning, the patient underwent open surgery in the beach chair position under regional anesthesia (ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block). A 3 cm long skin incision was made over the CP, directed as a cranial extension of standard deltoidopectoral approach. Cephalic vein was exposed and retracted laterally. The tip of the CP and the conjoined tendons (the short head of the biceps brachii and the coracobrachialis) were identified, and after splitting the tendons in line with the fibers, the CP was fully exposed. According to the preoperative plan, tumor ablation by drilling together with excochleation was performed, until healthy bone was exposed on the margins. Tumor tissue was sent for histopathologic analysis. The postoperative clinical course was uneventful and the patient reported immediate pain relief after the procedure, and physical therapy was started on the first postoperative day. Later on, histopathologic analysis confirmed OO tissue. On sixmonth follow up, the patient remained pain free and did not complain of any additional symptoms.
Functional assessment of the affected shoulder was performed using the Constant Shoulder Score (CSS) and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) (22-25). Preoperative CSS difference between the healthy and affected shoulder was 15 points (85 points on the left and 100 points on the right), while postoperatively there was no difference between the two sides, i.e. the score was 100 points bilaterally. Preoperative OSS was 24 on the left side, while postoperative score was maximum of 48 points, indicating that the patient was without any symptoms. Both CSS and OSS remained with maximum values on six-month follow up.
Discussion and Literature Review
Osteoid osteoma usually presents with nonspecific pain sensation, which increases during the night and responds well to NSAIDs (6,11). In cases when OO is situated in the scapula, pain intensity and distribution may differ and therefore different shoulder pathologies are suspected, while this benign osteogenic tumor is rarely taken into account (12,26). Moreover, OO localized in the CP usually presents with anterior shoulder pain and pathological entities such as shoulder instability, impingement syndrome or the rotator cuff tear are usually suspected (13). In addition, OO of the CP may cause stiffness of the antero-superior capsule, leading to painful movement restriction or even neurological symptoms due to the affected infraclavicular brachial plexus as the result of soft tissue edema (14,27). OO may also be conjoined with bone deformity, muscle atrophy or swelling of the surrounding tissues. These symptoms may resemble other clinical conditions such as osteomyelitis, Brodie abscess, stress fracture, and various bone tumors including osteoblastoma or Ewing tumor (28).
Most frequently, OO presents with the typical radiographic sign of a small (up to 2 cm) radiolucent oval nidus with the rim of the surrounding sclerotic bone (29). It is generally considered that bone tumors of the CP might be difficult to detect on plain radiographs (26). However, if plain radiographs reveal reactive bone formation and osteosclerosis, CT is further indicated since it provides high sensitivity and precision, which are the key features for future treatment. In cases when the underlying tumor cannot be detected on plain radiographs, MRI is usually performed since it provides excellent visualization of both the tumor and the accompanying bone marrow edema (14,30).
A great number of methods have been used in the treatment of OO including a wide spectrum of methods ranging from seldom used conservative approach with NSAIDs over minimally invasive percutaneous treatments which are currently considered the treatment of choice to open surgical methods.
Numerous percutaneous methods have been developed in order to precisely ablate OO, while preserving the surrounding structures and minimizing the need for postoperative immobilization. They include CT or MRI guided percutaneous techniques, divided into three categories depending on the type of ablation: (i) mechanical ablation, which includes CT guided percutaneous drilling, with a success rate of 94%; (ii) chemical ablation with the use of ethanol and acetic acid injections; and (iii) thermal ablation methods, which are the most widespread group of percutaneous techniques and include radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation, cryoablation and MRI guided high intensity focal ultrasound (MRgFUS) (15,16). RFA is currently considered as the treatment of choice (16). It is both safe and efficient therapy, with a high average initial success rate of 92%, low recurrence (0-35%) and complication rates (3%) (17). The most common complications are thermal damage to sensitive neurovascular structures localized in the probe vicinity and skin burns, and therefore, this method was not a suitable treatment option for our patient (16). In addition, we have to emphasize that percutaneous techniques often require sophisticated expensive devices, which are not available to some orthopedic centers dealing with this pathology.
Open surgical procedures include en bloc resections and curettage techniques with a success rate of 88%100% (18). They provide immediate relief of symptoms, have a low-cost advantage, and a low relapse rate with the possibility of histopathologic verification (9,15).
Coracoid process is a small hooked structure located on the scapular neck that arises anteriorly and serves as attachment for the coracoacromial, coracoclavicular and coracohumeral ligament, as well as for tendons of the coracobrachial, small pectoral and short head of the biceps brachii muscle. Since neurovascular structures pass medially to the CP, and musculocutaneous nerve penetrates the coracobrachial muscle right under the coracoid, this is a very delicate area that does not support RFA. Therefore, we decided to perform open surgical procedure in order to protect the important anatomical structures and preserve the functional role of the CP.
According to available literature, in 1994, Kaempffe was the first to successfully perform curettage of the OO nidus located on the CP using the posterior approach (12). Later on, several other open surgical techniques have also been described in the literature, and in most of the cases, anterior approach was used and coracoid osteotomy was performed, followed by OO excision and reattachment of the CP using a screw (13,19-21). Although all of these reports showed excellent results after follow up period of 2-30 months, we have to be aware that osteosynthetic material remains present after the methods where CP reattachment using a screw was performed (13,19-21). In such cases, an additional surgery may be required to remove any metal components that would interfere with CT or MRI. In addition, we have to be aware that non-union after CP reattachment also presents a possible complication that has not been reported in the literature so far, most probably due to the small number of published case reports. With the use of our approach, both of these complications would be excluded since CP remains completely intact. Accordingly, we believe that rehabilitation protocol following our surgical technique is faster and more suitable for younger population that usually practice sports activities. However, at the moment, we can only speculate about the advantages and disadvantages of different techniques, and we believe that a larger case series would be necessary to compare different approaches and to recognize the possible complications that cannot be predicted at this time.
In conclusion, for the treatment of OO of the CP, we recommend open surgical procedure with tumor ablation by drilling instead of CP resection, presenting a safe, simple and low-cost method that simultaneously completely destroys the lesion and preserves the anatomical and functional role of the CP.
(1.) Greenspan A, Jundt G, Remagen W. Differential Diagnosis in Orthopaedic Oncology. 2 (nd) edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007; p. 59-60.
(2.) Bergovec M, Kubat O, Smerdelj M, Seiwerth S, Bonevski A, Orlic D. Epidemiology of musculoskeletal tumors in a national referral orthopedic department. A study of 3482 cases. Cancer Epidemiol. 2015;39:298-302, http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.canep.2015.01.015
(3.) Niu X, Xu H, Inwards CY, Li Y, Ding Y, Letson GD, Bui MM. Primary bone tumors: epidemiologic comparison of 9200 patients treated at Beijing Ji Shui Tan Hospital, Beijing, China, with 10 165 patients at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015;139:1149-55, http://dx.doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2014-0432-OA
(4.) Jaffe HL. Osteoid osteoma: a benign osteoblastic tumor composed of osteoid and atypical bone. Arch Surg. 1935;31:709-28.
(5.) Hasegawa T, Hirose T, Sakamoto R, Seki K, Ikata T, Hizawa K. Mechanism of pain in osteoid osteomas: an immunohistochemical study. Histopathology 1993;22:487-91, https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.l365-2559.1993.tb00163.x
(6.) Mungo DV, Zhang X, O'Keefe RJ, Rosier RN, Puzas JE, Schwarz EM. COX-1 and COX-2 expression in osteoid osteomas.J Orthop Res.2002;20:159-62,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00065-l
(7.) Gangi A, Alizadeh H, Wong L, Buy X, Dietemann JL, Roy C. Osteoid osteoma: percutaneous laser ablation and follow up in 114 patients. Radiology. 2007;242:293-301, http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2421041404
(8.) Kransdorf MJ, Murphey MD. Osseous tumors. In: Davies AM, Sundaram M, James SL, editors. Imaging of Bone Tumors and Tumor-Like Llesions: Techniques and Applications. Berlin: Springer; 2009; p. 251-304.
(9.) Pratali R, Zuiani G, Inada M, Hanasilo C, Reganin L, Etchebehere E, Etchebehere M. Open resection of osteoid osteoma guided by a gamma-probe. Int Orthop. 2009;33:219-23, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0552-9
(10.) Akhlaghpoor S, Aziz Ahari A, Arjmand Shabestari A, Alinaghizadeh MR. Radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma in atypical locations: a case series. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468:1963-70, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/sll999-010-1265-0
(11.) Yokouchi M, Nagano S, Shimada H, Nakamura S, Setoguchi T, Kawamura I, Ishidou Y, Komiya S. Early complete remission of osteoid osteoma with conservative medical management. Pediatr Rep. 2014;6:5311, http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/pr.2014.5311
(12.) Kaempffe FA. Osteoid osteoma of the coracoid process. Excision by posterior approach. A case report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;301:260-2.
(13.) Akpinar S, Demirors H, Hersekli MA, Yildirim T, Barutcu O, Tandogan RN. Osteoid osteoma in the base of the coracoid process of the scapula. Excision by anterior approach: a case report. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2001;60:47-9.
(14.) Glanzmann MC, Imhoff AB, Schwyzer HK. Osteoid osteoma of the shoulder and elbow: from diagnosis to minimally invasive removal. Int Orthop. 2013;37:2403-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2060-9
(15.) Engel EE, Cava NF, Nogueira-Barbosa MH, Botter FA. CTguided percutaneous drilling is a safe and reliable method of treating osteoid osteomas. Springerplus. 2013;2:34, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-34
(16.) Filippiadis DK, Tutton S, Mazioti A, Kelekis A. Percutaneous image-guided ablation of bone and soft tissue tumours: a review of available techniques and protective measures. Insights Imaging. 2014;5:339-46, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/sl3244014-0332-6
(17.) Gebauer B, Collettini F, Bruger C, Schaser KD, Melcher I, Tunn PU, Streitparth F Radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteomas: analgesia and patient satisfaction in long-term follow-up. Rofo. 2013;184:959-66, http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-00331350347
(18.) Cantwell CP, Obyrne J, Eustace S. Current trends in treatment of osteoid osteoma with an emphasis on radiofrequency ablation. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:607-17, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2171-6
(19.) Gracia IA, Itarte JI, Majo JB, Salo GB, Proubasta IR. Osteoid osteoma of the coracoid process. J South Orthop Assoc. 2001; 10:49-52.
(20.) Gharahdaghi M, Rahimi Shorin H, Parsa A, Assadian M. En bloc resection of coracoid base osteoid osteoma in a child: an extremely rare case. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013;15:e9534, http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.9534
(21.) Pourfeizi HH, Sales JG, Elmi A, Tabrizi A. Osteoid osteoma of a scapula: a case report in a 34 year old woman. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2012;26:143-6.
(22.) Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;214: 160-4.
(23.) Fabre T, Piton C, Leclouerec G, Gervais-Delion F, Durandeau A. Entrapment of the suprascapular nerve. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:414-9.
(24.) Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:593-600.
(25.) Dawson J, Rogers K, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. The Oxford Shoulder Score revisited. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129:11923, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0549-7
(26.) Ogose A, Sim FH, O'Connor MI, Unni KK. Bone tumors of the coracoid process of the scapula. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;358:205-14.
(27.) Angius D, Shaughnessy WJ, Amrami KK, Matsumoto JM, Spinner RJ. Infraclavicular brachial plexopathy secondary to coracoid osteoid osteoma. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2007;16:199-203.
(28.) Rajeev A, Ali M, Ralte A, Chakaravathy J. Osteoid osteoma as an unusual cause of wrist pain--a case report and review of literature. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2014;5:896-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.10.067
(29.) Bloem JL, Kroon HM. Osseous lesions. Radiol Clin North Am. 1993;31:261-78.
(30.) Zoboski RJ. Occult osteoid osteoma presenting as shoulder pain: a case report. J Chiropr Med. 2012;3:207-14, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2012.06.002
OSTEOID OSTEOM KORAKOIDNOG NASTAVKA: PRIKAZ SLUCAJA I PREGLED LITERATURE
D. Bozic, M. Josipovic, I. Bohacek, T. Smoljanovic i I. Bojanic
Osteoid osteom (OO) je dobrocudni osteoblasticni tumor kostiju koji se najcesce javlja u adolescenata i mladih odraslih osoba. Uobicajena lokalizacija OO su duge kosti pa se rijetko razmatra u diferencijalnoj dijagnostici kronicne boli u po drucju ramena. Prikazujemo slucaj mladog sportasa u dobi od 22 godine koji se zalio na bolove u lijevom ramenu, i to bez pret hodne ozljede. Intenzitet boli znacajno se pojacavao tijekom noci, a bol se smirivala nakon primjene nesteroidnih protuupalnih lijekova. Ovi tipicni simptomi odmah su usmjerili dijagnozu k OO, a magnetska rezonancija i kompjutorizirana tomografi ja pokazale su da je rijec o OO korakoidnog nastavka skapule. Buduci da se zilnozivcani snop nalazi u blizini korakoidnog nastavka radiofrekventna ablacija nije prikladna metoda za lijecenje OO te lokalizacije pa smo se odlucili za kirursko lijecenje. Nacinili smo ablaciju tumora svrdlanjem te ekskohleacijom. Od operacijskog zahvata bolesnik se vise nije zalio ni na kakvu bol u podrucju lijevog ramena. S obzirom na danasnje spoznaje savjetujemo da se OO korakoidnog nastavka svakako lijeci kirurskim zahvatom tijekom kojeg valja tumor unistiti svrdlanjem. Za razliku od resekcije korakoidnog nastavka, svrdlanjem se u potpunosti unistava leziju i istodobno cuva integritet korakoidnog nastavka, sto je od velikog anatomskog i funkcionalnog znacenja.
Kljucne rijeci: Osteom, osteoidni; Skapula--patologija; Rameni zglob--patologija; Bol--terapija; Prikazi slucaja
Dorotea Bozic (1), Mario Josipovic (2), Ivan Bohacek (2,3),Tomislav Smoljanovic (2,4) and Ivan Bojanic (2)
(1) Department of Gastroenterology, Split University Hospital Center, Split; (2) Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zagreb University Hospital Center; (3) Department of Anatomy and Clinical Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; (4) The Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, Surrey, United Kingdom
Correspondence to: Ivan Bohacek, MD, PhD, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zagreb University Hospital Center, Salata 6-7, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Received December 7,2015, accepted June 16,2016
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Case Report|
|Author:||Bozic, Dorotea; Josipovic, Mario; Bohacek, Ivan; Smoljanovic, Tomislav; Bojanic, Ivan|
|Publication:||Acta Clinica Croatica|
|Date:||Nov 1, 2016|
|Previous Article:||Pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum as a rare complication of laparoscopic surgery.|
|Next Article:||Botryoid cyst, a rare type of odontogenic cyst.|